• No results found

Energy Saving Partnership Berlin

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Energy Saving Partnership Berlin"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

International Conference

“Climate protection potential of energy efficiency”

Brussels, 09 November 2011

(2)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Foundation

in 1992 as Public-Private Partnership

Shareholders

Federal State of Berlin

Vattenfall Europe

GASAG

KfW Banking Group

Disposes of

2.5 m € of capital stock

Annual Turnover

9.3 m €

526 k € Company earnings (EBIT)

Know-how

55 members of staff

Energy Services

Contracting

Consulting

International Know-How Transfer

Based in

Französische Straße 23

10117 Berlin

Phone:

(030) 29 33 30 - 0

e-mail:

[email protected]

Internet:

www.berliner-e-agentur.de

BEA – Facts and Figures

(3)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Building

owner

ESCO

Supply

Electricity, gas, district heat …)

Building(s)

payment

Saving guarantee

payment

coordination

of measures

Building

operatio

n

Savi

ng s

ervic

e

(4)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3 Pool 4, Pankow Pool 5, Hellersdorf Pool 6, Spandau Pool 8, HU Pool 9, Friedrichshain Liegenschaften 35 45 34 56 36 24 4 30 Baseline-Kosten in €/a 3.948.526 € 5.476.100 € 2.699.279 € 2.074.988 € 1.478.027 € 671.165 € 956.178 € 1.090.529 € Baseline-Verbrauch in MWh/a 74.810 100.990 52.540 49.512 27.476 17.121 18.031 21.952 Energiesparpartner ARGE ESP

Bewag / Landis & Staefa GmbH

SFW GmbH, ESB Energiesparen & Betreiben

ARGE ESP Landis & Staefa GmbH / Bewag Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH HEW Contract GmbH Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH

ARGE ESP HUB (Kieback&Peter/edl) MVV Energie AG (ARGE mit WFM wurde 2002 aufgelöst) Vertragsbeginn Beginn Hauptleistungsphase Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht

01.04.1996 01.04.1996 12,75 Jahre 01.04.1996 01.04.1996 12,75 Jahre 01.05.1998 01.10.1998 12 Jahre 12.04.1999 01.03.2000 14 Jahre 01.07.2000 01.01.2001 14 Jahre 01.04.2000 01.02.2001 14 Jahre 01.05.2004 01.11.2004 8 Jahre 31.01.2001 01.10.2001 10 Jahre Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht 12,75 12,75 12,00 14,00 14,00 14,00 8,00 10,00 Erstinvestition in € 3.118.880 € 3.530.414 € 1.561.997 € 1.771.339 € 2.291.866 € 598.241 € 1.029.000 € 939.243 € Garantieeinsparung in % ca. 20% * ca. 25% * 15,70% 24,20% 23,58% 22,00% 23,43% 19,67% Garantieeinsparung in € 789.705 € 1.369.025 € 423.787 € 502.147 € 348.519 € 147.656 € 224.000 € 214.507 € CO2-Einsparung in t/a 8.300 5.400 3.000 2.500 1.100 1.000 1.643 925 Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in % 7,54% 9,28% 7,28% 7,10% 6,72% 4,00% 1,52% 3,46% Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in €/a 297.719 € 508.102 € 196.637 147.325 € 99.328 € 26.873 € 14.560 37.753 € Zusätzliche Beteiligung des AG

in % ab 20 % Einsparung: 70 ab 25 % Einsparung: 60 ab 30 % Einsparung: 50 ab 30 % Einsparung: 50 10 80 50 50 80 90

Bedienung / Instandhaltung von Altanlagen durch AN

ja ja ja ja ja ja nein nein

Energy Saving Partnerships =

Energy Performance Contracting for public buildings in Berlin

1995 founded - climate protection targets of the State of Berlin

coordination by:

BEA + Senat of Berlin, Division Climate protection

Political back-up by severall political parties and parlamentary groups

in the Berlin City Parliament

(5)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3 Pool 4, Pankow Pool 5, Hellersdorf Pool 6, Spandau Pool 8, HU Pool 9, Friedrichshain Liegenschaften 35 45 34 56 36 24 4 30 Baseline-Kosten in €/a 3.948.526 € 5.476.100 € 2.699.279 € 2.074.988 € 1.478.027 € 671.165 € 956.178 € 1.090.529 € Baseline-Verbrauch in MWh/a 74.810 100.990 52.540 49.512 27.476 17.121 18.031 21.952 Energiesparpartner ARGE ESP

Bewag / Landis & Staefa GmbH

SFW GmbH, ESB Energiesparen & Betreiben

ARGE ESP Landis & Staefa GmbH / Bewag Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH HEW Contract GmbH Johnson Controls JCI Regelungs-technik GmbH

ARGE ESP HUB (Kieback&Peter/edl) MVV Energie AG (ARGE mit WFM wurde 2002 aufgelöst) Vertragsbeginn Beginn Hauptleistungsphase Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht

01.04.1996 01.04.1996 12,75 Jahre 01.04.1996 01.04.1996 12,75 Jahre 01.05.1998 01.10.1998 12 Jahre 12.04.1999 01.03.2000 14 Jahre 01.07.2000 01.01.2001 14 Jahre 01.04.2000 01.02.2001 14 Jahre 01.05.2004 01.11.2004 8 Jahre 31.01.2001 01.10.2001 10 Jahre Dauer der Hauptleistungspflicht 12,75 12,75 12,00 14,00 14,00 14,00 8,00 10,00 Erstinvestition in € 3.118.880 € 3.530.414 € 1.561.997 € 1.771.339 € 2.291.866 € 598.241 € 1.029.000 € 939.243 € Garantieeinsparung in % ca. 20% * ca. 25% * 15,70% 24,20% 23,58% 22,00% 23,43% 19,67% Garantieeinsparung in € 789.705 € 1.369.025 € 423.787 € 502.147 € 348.519 € 147.656 € 224.000 € 214.507 € CO2-Einsparung in t/a 8.300 5.400 3.000 2.500 1.100 1.000 1.643 925 Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in % 7,54% 9,28% 7,28% 7,10% 6,72% 4,00% 1,52% 3,46% Garantierte Haushaltsentlastung in €/a 297.719 € 508.102 € 196.637 147.325 € 99.328 € 26.873 € 14.560 37.753 € Zusätzliche Beteiligung des AG

in % ab 20 % Einsparung: 70 ab 25 % Einsparung: 60 ab 30 % Einsparung: 50 ab 30 % Einsparung: 50 10 80 50 50 80 90

Bedienung / Instandhaltung von Altanlagen durch AN

ja ja ja ja ja ja nein nein

Number of contracts / pools:

26, about 1,400 buildings

Guaranteed Savings (all contracts):

ca. 11,7 Mio. €/a

Share of Berlin (Savings on public budgets):

ca. 2.7 Mio. €/a

CO

2

-Reduction

around 69,600 t/a

Investments (all pools):

ca. 51,6 Mio. €

(6)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Client

(State, hospital, etc.)

Berliner Energieagentur

Project Manager

Energy Saving Partner

ESCO

Assignment

Consultancy

Technical-economic requirements,

Negotiations

Energy Saving Guarantee Contract

(7)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Energy Saving Partnership (ESP) – A Model of Success

A pool of buildings includes e.g.:

Schools and Kindergarten

Universities, Opera

Swimming Pools

Offices and Administration

Implemented Measures:

Refurbishment of

heating, ilumination,

automatic control, etc.

Energy Management

(8)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Pool:

69 buildings (schools,

kindergarten, gyms)

Baseline:

1.84 Mio. €/a

Guaranteed savings:

29,4 % = 541,679 €/a

Invest:

ca. 2.8 Mio. €

CO

2

-reduction :

3,973 t/a

Duration of contract:

14 years

Measures:

new boilers in 11 buildings, switch from

coal/heat oil to gas, building automation,

modernisation of lighting

100,000 € for Renewable energy

technologies, e.g. solar thermal systems

ESP Best Practice: Pool 19 District Steglitz-Zehlendorf

(9)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

ESP Best Practice: Berliner Bäder-Betriebe (Swimming Pools)

Pool:

11 buildings/swimming pools

Baseline:

4.9 Mio. €/a (

incl. water costs

)

Guaranteed savings:

33,5 % = 1.6 Mio. €/a

Invest:

7.9 Mio. €

CO

2

-reduction :

4,938 t/a

Duration of contract:

10 years

Measures:

water saving technology, optimizing filter

flushes, separating water circulations,

modernisation of hot water generation

renovation of air conditioning and lighting

(10)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Best Practice – Berliner Immobilienmanagement GmbH (Pool 24)

Re-tender after expiration of first ESP contracts (Pools 1 + 2)

Pool:

18 office buildings

(ca. 300,000 m² GFA)

Baseline 2007:

2.066 Mio. €/a

Guaranteed savings:

21 % = 433,757 €/a

Investment:

ca. 2.4 Mio. €

CO

2

-reduction:

2,208 t/a

Duration:

10 years

Measures (selected):

boiler replacement, CHP-unit, optimizing of

ventilation systems, renewal of CBCS,

special feature: obligation of maintenance

of all old systems

(11)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Guaranteed energy savings achieved in most contracts, high savings

up to 35 % feasible

26 contracts operated by 17 different ESCOs, around 100

subcontractors (regional SMEs) involved in implementation and

maintenance

Good quality in saving measures because of expertise of ESCOs,

rising experience and improvement of cost effectiveness

Additional improvement of maintenance situation by central

coordination through ESCO

No legal proceedings or need to use the bank guarantees so far,

successful re-tendering of EPC projects leads to long-term savings

ESP – Experiences and Results in Berlin

Success thanks to reliable legal framework, standardized procedures

(12)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Future Challenges

Ambitious climate and energy efficiency targets

-

Higher EPC savings necessary through comprehensive

measures

-

Connection to certification / trade systems and monetization

of savings for EPC investments

Need for decentralization and energy storage

-

Focus on load management measures and electricity savings

-

New M&V methods, stronger connection to smart metering

Technology development

-

Focus on renewable energy technologies and CHP

-

EPC as (financing) instrument to create smart buildings (demand

side management)

(13)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

EPC plus

-

Integration of (comprehensive) building refurbishment measures

-

Shared financing instruments

-

First EPC with (small) share of construction measures

EPC light

-

Operation and energy management of buildings with saving

guarantee

-

First pilot project, 12 public buildings district of Pankow, Berlin

Green EPC

-

Focus on renewable energy technologies

-

Specific tender objectives and link to subsidy programs

-

Primary energy consumption as guaranteed element

Perspectives of further EPC models

(14)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

• Model contracts and tender documents (A, D, F, FIN, GR, I, N, S)

• Results: 17 new EPC projects kick-started

Model contracts and tender documents (LV, LT, PL, CZ, SLO, SK, BG, H)

• Results: > 10 contracts signed since 2003

Standards set by BEA realised in several other countries

• Improving EPC and energy efficiency standards (2009-11) (B, SE, NO, CZ, SK, SI, RO, A, F)

• European Energy Service Award

Clearcontract – Clearinghouse for Energy Contracting in CEE

Clearcontract –

European Energy Service Initiative

• Slovenia, Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, Mexico, Estonia

• Ongoing: Chile, Brazil, India, Romania, Serbia, Monaco

(15)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Conclusions

EPC is a high potential instrument for future energy challenges

Successful EPC projects consist in a balance of standard

and flexible elements for the customer

Experienced project facilitators are needed for successful

project implementation

Availability of tools and model contracts in each European

country is crucial

European policy makers need to establish suitable standards

(16)

09 November 2011

© Berliner Energieagentur GmbH

Thank you for your attention

For more information:

www.berliner-e-agentur.de

www.european-energy-service-initiative.net

[email protected]

References

Related documents