• No results found

BY CHARLES FOREMAN AND CHRIS LOWEN, P.E., MEMBER ASHRAE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "BY CHARLES FOREMAN AND CHRIS LOWEN, P.E., MEMBER ASHRAE"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

4 8

Optimizing

A LANDMARK

B Y C H A R L E S F O R E M A N A N D C H R I S L O W E N , P. E . , M E M B E R A S H R A E C A S E S T U D Y Nic Lehoux 4 8 H I G H P E R F O R M I N G B U I L D I N G S S u m m e r 2 0 1 5

(2)

S u m m e r 2 0 1 5 H I G H P E R F O R M I N G B U I L D I N G S 4 94 9

On the roof, 13,000 ft2 of

photovoltaic panels create a distinct signature on the skyline. The dra-matic transformation of the building’s exterior appearance has captured the attention of passersby and created a landmark in downtown Portland.

With the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) as a driver, the project team fostered a coopera-tive process that resulted in cost savings, quality improvements, and optimum ongoing building performance. Innovative commis-sioning and energy modeling helped enhance system design, installation, and eventually operation.

Project Conception

The need to modernize the existing building to save energy, improve comfort, and meet modern blast resistance guidelines was obvious. The GSA also saw EGWW as an opportunity to test innovations in project delivery and deliver a better building as a result.

With a mandate to be a “learn-ing team,” design and construction

E

nergy savings goals

for the building were specified by the proj-ect’s funding source, the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The federal stimulus funding required energy savings of 30% over ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007, and a 55% reduction in fossil fuel energy over a 2003 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) baseline. The building team pursued an integrated design approach, which began with a building skin optimized for energy efficiency via innovative envelope shading devices, opti-mized window-to-wall ratios, and excellent daylighting.

Hydronic radiant panels meet the remaining heating and cooling loads, supported by a dedicated out-door air system. To reduce potable water use, the team implemented rainwater reuse by adapting an existing, unused basement shooting range into a 165,000 gallon rainwa-ter storage tank.

Clad in a new envelope of glass and steel with a

sloping rooftop solar parasol, the Edith Green-Wendell

Wyatt (EGWW) building bears little resemblance

to the white concrete façade of the original 1970s

building. Exterior shading and radiant systems provide

excellent comfort and energy efficiency. But

energy-optimized buildings can’t be handed over “as is” at

completion and be expected to thrive. A year of

post-occupancy commissioning proved key in transforming

this federal building from an energy hog to a high

performance workplace.

BUILDING AT A GLANCE

Name Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building

Location Portland, Ore.

Owner General Services Administration Principal Use GSA offices

Includes Central data center, federal courts, and office space Employees/Occupants 1,520 Expected (Design) Occupancy 1,530

Percent Occupied 99%

Gross Square Footage 512,474 ft2

Conditioned Space 438,952 ft2

Distinctions/Awards

2013, LEED 2009-NC, Platinum; 2014 GSA Design Honor Award; 2014 Tall Building in America Award | Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat; 2014 AIA COTE Top Ten Award; 2013 AIA Technology in Architectural Practice (TAP)/Building Information Modelling (BIM) Winner | Construction Owners Association of America Owners’ Choice Award: Renovation/Retrofit Award Total Cost $136 million

Cost per Square Foot $247 Substantial Completion May 2013 Substantial Occupancy February 2014 When Built 1974

Major Renovation 2010 to 2013 Renovation Scope

Total core and shell renovation and ten-ant improvement

Nic Lehoux

Above A northwest-facing view out through the exterior “reeds,” which reduce solar gain and maximize daylight.

Opposite The new high performance façade and rooftop solar array at the Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt building soar above down-town Portland, Ore. Each façade is tuned to specifically address solar orientation. E D I T H G R E E N - W E N D E L L W Y A T T F E D E R A L B U I L D I N G

(3)

professionals worked together in shared office space, initially in the building itself, to improve commu-nication and rapid testing of ideas. Integrated building information

Expanded Commissioning

Beyond review of design documents and functional testing, the commis-sioning authority — an EGWW proj-ect team member from early design to after occupancy — saw the commis-sioning process as a continual process of discovery and communication. Identifying potential challenges ahead of time and seeking out solutions with the team is part of the process.

One of the most important tasks was to help the contractors under-stand exactly what they were modeling (BIM) also fostered

com-munication, and resulted in a final model that will be a resource for the GSA in the future. Approximately $1 million in design and construc-tion cost savings resulted from this delivery model, part of which funded post-occupancy building optimization and monitoring ser-vices by the project team, what the project team calls “aftercare.”

Results

The project reused nearly all of the existing structural elements, sig-nificantly reducing the embodied carbon compared to a conventional building. In the first full year of operation, the building recorded a 39% energy cost reduction and 45% energy use reduction compared to Standard 90.1-2007. In addition to the building performance, the design team credits the integrated design process with cutting reduc-tion in requests for informareduc-tion (RFIs) by more than half (measured against comparable projects by the same architect) and cutting the paper used for architectural con-tract documents by 92%. Modeled Annual Water Use

1.28 million gallons (61% reduction in potable water use)

WATER AT A GLANCE ENERGY AT A GLANCE Annual Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) 35.8 kBtu/ft2

Natural Gas 10.74 kBtu/ft2

Electricity (From Grid) 23.82 kBtu/ft2

Renewable Energy 1.2 kBtu/ft2

Annual Source (Primary) Energy 86 kBtu/ft2

Annual Energy Cost Index (ECI) $0.72/ft2

Annual Net Energy Use Intensity 34.6 kBtu/ft2

Savings vs. Standard 90.1-2007 Design Building 46%

Heating Degree Days (Base 65˚F) 4,214 Cooling Degree Days (Base 65˚F) 433 Annual Hours Occupied 2,800

The precast concrete façade of the building before renovation. Only the structural components of the building remain.

Nic Lehoux

SERA

The northwest-facing first floor lobby space looks out through vines growing up the base of the exterior shading.

(4)

S u m m e r 2 0 1 5 H I G H P E R F O R M I N G B U I L D I N G S 5 15 1

installing. A subcontractor will obviously know how to install their individual scope, but helping the entire team understand the whole system yielded ideas to save costs or identify potential problems.

The commissioning work on EGWW was informed by past proj-ect work on major radiant heating and cooling systems at both the Twelve | West mixed-use building in Portland, Ore. (High Performing Buildings, Spring 2013), and the Wayne L. Morse U. S. Courthouse

part of the scheduled commission agent design review.

Analysis using software devel-oped by the Center for the Built Environment at the University of California, Berkeley, revealed the potential for a wider than normal temperature differential at the perimeter. The design was revised as a result, and the study was shared with tenants to help them better appreciate the range of com-fort zones and how that data might inform where people sit.

The mechanical system at EGWW has 50 miles of pipe, much of it fusion-welded polypropylene, which is not yet part of typical con-struction in the Pacific Northwest. Correct installation is key to avoid-ing air locks in the radiant ceilavoid-ing panels, so the commissioning team worked with the general contractor to schedule time at the beginning in Eugene, Ore. In an early design

review, the commissioning team raised a question about the radi-ant panel layout in which panels were distributed evenly across the ceiling.

The team felt, based on published design guidelines and project expe-rience, that at least half of the panel area should be concentrated in the outer 4 ft of ceiling adjacent to the glass to adequately meet perimeter heating loads. The team performed a detailed thermal comfort study as

Exterior solar shading is a major part of the architectural expression of the building, and essential to the heating and cooling strategy.

Nic Lehoux

FIGURE 2 ANNUAL ENERGY COST

Original Building $617,200* $503,500* $310,750* $315,463* “Code” Building ASHRAE Standard 90.1–2007 Modernized** Building Forecasted Energy Cost Modernized** Building Actual Energy Cost

FIGURE 1 BUILDING ENERGY USE COMPARISON

(million Btu) 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Premodernization Three-Year Average

Energy Model Baseline

2014 Actual Energy Model Proposed

Note: Energy cost calculated based on average monthly use from October 2013 to September 2014. * Calculated at 2014 energy cost. ** Modernized building includes a 14% increase in leasable area compared to the original building.

(5)

By contrast, in a radiant system, thermostats must be within the outer third of the space to sense perimeter loads, but not under a heating source. Radiant systems have slower reaction time than typi-cal air heating systems. Working with the controls contractor, adjust-ments were made to the thermostat programming for quicker response.

These issues and countless oth-ers were worked out during weekly commissioning meetings held throughout the construction process. At the height of construction, the meetings included 20 people who were responsible for a team of 200 people working on site.

Commission the Users

The project team anticipated some occupant surprise at an HVAC system that is silent and has rela-tively little air movement. The team describes moving from an air sys-tem to a radiant syssys-tem as being

“like going from a breezy beach to a still pine forest next to a cool pond.” Both can be comfortable, but the contrast might be jarring.

The architect and owner launched an effort to ensure a smooth tran-sition to the new building. A

of installation to work with the sub-contractors and optimize what they called “the first mile of pipe.”

This early commissioning effort helped ensure the remaining 49 miles of installation went smoothly. The building engineers report that the radiant system piping and con-trols are working smoothly, and that no leaks or air entrainment in the lines has been identified.

Another focus of the team was proper placement and programming of thermostats. In a typical air-based mechanical system, a ther-mostat would be placed by the door for convenience, relying on the rela-tively even mixing of conditioned air for accurate readings.

Water

A 165,000 gallon rainwater cistern (a former rifle range) holds water fun-neled from roof.

Predicted water savings of 61% com-pared to code.

Captured rainwater is reused for low-flow toilets and fixtures, landscape irrigation and mechanical cooling. Proportion of overall water consumption dedicated to mechanical system cooling decreased from 16% to 9% after renovation. Storm water mitigation strategies. Materials

Reduction of 92% in paper used for architectural contract documents. Nearly 100% of structural elements saved. Construction waste divergence rate of 87%.

Daylighting and Shading

Daylight penetration and energy-efficient electric lighting systems with advanced controls reduce lighting energy by 40% compared to Oregon code.

Roof canopy shades uppermost floors. Steel shading devices minimize solar heat gain on south, west and east elevations. Transportation Mitigation Strategies Two blocks from major public transit line. Other Major Sustainable Features Rooftop photovoltaic panels (184 kW). A 100% dedicated outdoor air system. Heat recovery ventilator.

Hydronic radiant heating/cooling ceilings. Collocated data room with heat recovery chiller.

Demand-control ventilation for high occupancy rooms.

High-efficiency task lighting, appliances and A/V equipment.

KEY SUSTAINABLE FEATURES

The building’s existing façade was trans-formed into a curtain wall with “reeds” on the northwest face that stretch up the entire 18-story height of the building. On the southwest and southeast faces, integrated sunshade/light reflectors provide daylighting and shade.

Nic Lehoux

Representative space plan showing office layout with daylight in mind. Private offices to the interior on most façades.

FIGURE 3

TYPICAL TENANT FLOORPLAN

Core Tenant Area Circulation

(6)
(7)

week-long series of classes on the building helped users understand the features of the building and know what to expect in terms of new operational policies. These sessions allowed the project team to empha-size the reasons that decisions were made, and to explain performance targets that led to policies such as no desk fans or heaters, and central-ized printers that people might have to walk further to reach.

Occupant response to the building has been overwhelmingly positive. The project team attributes this, in part, to the education process and to occupant buy-in that resulted from the effort.

The team finds it gratifying to see occupants who are passionate about contributing to the build-ing’s goals and are patient with all of the changes. The GSA has plans for ongoing occupant education to maintain comfort and building per-formance. For example, emails were sent during the spring to remind building users to close blinds on east-facing windows in the evening for control of solar gain early the next morning.

FIGURE 4 SHADING STRATEGIES ture. The clean ceiling appearance belies the Radiant panels integrated with the architec-intricate mechanical system installation.

Northwest Optimized glazing to wall ratio

Low infiltration rate

Super insulated wall Summer mid-day sun

(high angle)

Equinox morning sun (lower angle)

Southeast and Southwest

Nic Lehoux

SERA

Careful analysis and design by the architectural team created a high performance façade system that optimizes daylighting and blocks undesirable heat gain. Envelope performance was informed by the capacity of the radiant heating and cooling system.

(8)

S u m m e r 2 0 1 5 H I G H P E R F O R M I N G B U I L D I N G S 5 55 5

different program options through sensitivity analysis.

To reinforce this approach, the energy team communicated poten-tial energy performance as a range of percentage savings rather than a specific number. This way, the proj-ect team was able to feel confident it could meet energy goals even if the team secured a tenant with a need for a large data center, extended occupancy hours, or other energy-intensive demands.

As the project progressed and occupants were secured, the energy model was updated to reflect the actual federal tenants. To develop an understanding of the occupants,

Energy Model

Energy modeling for EGWW went well beyond that for most build-ings, in part because the perfor-mance requirements were federal mandates, and because the GSA places strong emphasis on tracking and reporting actual project per-formance. The detailed modeling effort included trying to account for unknowns as the project pro-gressed, anticipating the impact of

the architects developed an email survey for office managers asking about a range of topics, from work-ing hours to equipment used. Three large government bureaus make up

Building Owner/Representative General Services Administration Architect SERA Architects / Cutler Andersen Architects

General Contractor

Howard S. Wright Construction, a Balfour Beatty Construction Company Mechanical Engineer Stantec / McKinstry Electrical Engineer

PAE Consulting Engineers

Energy Modeler, Commissioning Agent Glumac

Structural, Civil Engineer KPFF Environmental, LEED Consultant SERA Architects

Landscape Architect Place Studio Lighting Design Luma Lighting Design B U I L D I N G T E A M

Above Strategic removal of the existing concrete floor plate allows daylight pen-etration into circulation areas.

Below Mechanical equipment occupies roof space beneath the sloping solar array, which was added as part of the modernization. The canopy also shades the building’s top floors.

Nic Lehoux

Glumac

Roof

Type Built-up 6 in. concrete with continuous insulation

Overall R-value R-40 Reflectivity High Walls

Type Insulated spandrel with continuous insulation Overall R-value R-25 Glazing Percentage 41% Basement/Foundation

Slab Edge Insulation R-value R-20 Basement Wall Insulation R-value R-14.2

Windows

Effective U-factor for Assembly 0.39 Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) 0.27 Visual Transmittance 51%

Location Latitude 45.95 N

Orientation City block (NSEW) BUILDING ENVELOPE

(9)

the majority of building occupants, simplifying the effort somewhat, but collecting such detailed occupant data was still a significant effort.

Tenant needs and practices are surprisingly diverse. Some bureaus do their work with laptops, and some with less efficient desktop computers. Another bureau, the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, with its focus on fieldwork, typically has low overall desk occupancy.

Some occupants have flexible schedules and are only in the office four days a week. To address this complexity, the model includes five different groups of office occupants, 35 different space types, three dif-ferent occupancy schedules, three equipment profiles, and three light-ing profiles, all combined in a total of 210 unique energy use scenarios.

Operating Results

The EGWW building has a robust energy monitoring system with dedi-cated reporting for end uses, mak-ing performance trackmak-ing straight-forward. The team has been pleased to see actual overall energy cost

track within 1.6% of the model dur-ing the first year of operation.

As expected in any project, the end uses differ slightly from the model. In the end, the modeled and actual cooling energy use track closely, plug and lighting loads are lower than predicted, and heating use is slightly higher.

One insight from the detailed per-formance data is that the higher heat-ing energy use reflects, in part, the performance of the lighting control

system. Current modeling practices tend to underestimate the lighting and plug power reductions achieved by modern lighting controls and plug load management. Based on energy tracking for EGWW and other proj-ects, energy savings for these strate-gies can be as much as an additional 40% beyond what may have been anticipated. This is good news for lighting and plug energy use, but overall lower internal loads, will increase heating energy. LESSONS LEARNED

From the Owner Perspective:

Helping People Reinvent Themselves To Better Serve The Project Interests Is Hard Work. Most people are taught traditional delivery first (design-bid-build). Integrated delivery is very different and more chal-lenging.  Adding to the challenge (inherent in the delivery method) is the effort/energy needed to “discard” the past (or the way most people learn to deliver projects), or to reinvent oneself.

Once the reinvention starts, passion for the project grows, inspiring innovation or ideas that otherwise wouldn’t have sur-faced. Those ideas get reshaped by the team, and adapted, creating more value for the owner, or in GSA’s case a bigger bang for the taxpayer dollar.

From the Commissioning Perspective: Extra Capacity Can Mitigate Risk. Designing on the edge is risky, especially when there are future unknowns. Adding some amount of extra capacity can save dollars in the end.

Integrated Delivery Requires More Interaction. Integrated product delivery means the project is in constant change. A much more interactive approach is required for commissioning tasks. This project involved many more meetings and coordination with the contractors. Complex and New Systems Require More Education. Additional explanation is needed at every stage for all involved — installers, owners, users and operators. The more that all of the participants knew about the

sys-tem, the smoother the project went. Plan to spend an additional 10% or more of your time explaining how something works.

Even a complex new system can be kept simple. Don’t try to make systems more complex than they need be. Stick to the basics and try to keep things simple. From the Energy Efficiency Perspective: Understanding the Incoming User Offers Incredible Value. Occupancy levels, hours worked and equipment used all can have significant impact in a low energy building. When Forecasting Performance,

Communicate in Ranges Rather Than Specific Numbers. It better reflects the potential performance and prevents mak-ing decisions about energy efficiency mea-sures based on false confidence. Always Perform a Sensitivity Analysis. Use multiple scenarios for building occupancy and how the building could be used as part of your early energy analysis. Energy analysts tend to focus on a single building operating scenario and tenant. You want to ensure that the owner can still meet the energy goals if the tenant mixes change during design. Inevitably, building usage pat-terns will change over the life of the building and this needs to be taken into account. You Can Never Start Talking About Maintenance and Verification (M&V) Early Enough. M&V was pushed out, then written based on LEED. Implementation was diffi-cult. The resulting performance monitoring system is more complex than required as a result.

Chilled water pumps, with mechanical mezzanine above. The system provides chilled water to the radiant panels and air handling units.

(10)
(11)

On another recent project for the energy modeler, the lighting system, with daylight responsive dimming and vacancy sensors, out-performed modeled performance by 100%. This is good news for lighting energy use, but means overall lower internal loads, which increases the heating load.

Heat recovery is a major energy efficiency measure at EGWW, and is incorporated into two key sys-tems. The first is total energy heat recovery wheels in the dedicated outdoor air systems that recover heat from the electrical room exhaust, restroom exhaust, and other building relief systems. The second is a heat recovery chiller that provides cooling to the on-site

data center and heat for the radiant panels during the heating season.

During a typical commissioning period, a building will have relatively little internal load, and it is difficult to optimize heat recovery systems when there is little heat to recover. Consequently, during the first year of occupancy, heat recovery was a major focus of the commissioning team in working with the building operators to tune the building, which is also referred to as the “aftercare” process.

Aftercare

On many projects, construction ends along with the contract, compelling the design and construction team members to transfer their design intent to operators as best they can and move on. The aftercare process imple-mented by GSA at EGWW retained the project team well into post-occupancy to smooth the transition from construction to operation. For the commissioning team, that meant the opportunity to work with the build-ing operators for over a year, meetbuild-ing weekly to optimize systems, solve problems and transfer knowledge. Just as the occupant experience is different with radiant heating and cooling, building operators need to change their approach if they are more familiar with air-based systems. At EGWW, operators had to learn to solve temperature complaints without the use of air systems. The year of overlap between teams was invaluable

both for energy performance and for the comfort of occupants.

Of all the innovations and les-sons learned on the Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt project, one of the most broadly applicable lessons is that high-tech buildings need post-occupancy design team involvement to avoid falling out of calibration. The commissioning team is an advocate for aftercare, but thinks it’s most appropriate or necessary for complex projects, new-builds or significant modernization.

The performance results at EGWW prove the value of ensuring the first year of occupancy becomes another phase of the design and construction process. The operating net energy use intensity (EUI) for the project is 34.6 kBtu/ft2 · yr (not including energy used from the on-site solar PV), in range of the projected EUI of 30 to 35. This compares especially favorably with the pre-project EUI of 75.5 kBtu/ft2 · yr.

Energy performance improved as systems came into tune over the course of a year, ensuring that the promise of rigorous analysis, data-driven design and sophisti-cated construction came to fruition. Throughout the process, the GSA and EGWW team demonstrated and proved an essential model for pub-lic and private sectors.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS Charles Foreman is a project manager at Glumac in Portland, Ore., and was the commissioning project manager on this project.

Chris Lowen, P.E., Member ASHRAE, LEED AP, is an energy analyst at Glumac in Portland, Ore. He was the energy analyst and measurement and verifica-tion lead for this project.

Above The Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building uses less than half the energy that was used by the building prior to modernization. The high performance façade is key to the building’s energy-efficient design.

Right Southeast façade with exterior shading. Daylight penetration and energy-efficient electric lighting systems with advanced controls reduce lighting energy by 40% compared to Oregon code.

Nic Lehoux

(12)

References

Related documents

Pithawalla College Of Eng... Institute

The work presented here supports the prevailing view that both CD and IOVD share common cortical loci, although they draw on different sources of visual information, and that

Using PowerAlert software, select models with multiple communication ports will simultaneously provide intelligent communications, shutdown commands and reporting on

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

Figure 6: Determination of cell viability and induction of γH2AX foci in Rad51 knockdown cells upon TMZ/ αVβ3 integrin silencing.. (D) Time-dependent induction of

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

National Conference on Technical Vocational Education, Training and Skills Development: A Roadmap for Empowerment (Dec. 2008): Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department

Furthermore, while symbolic execution systems often avoid reasoning precisely about symbolic memory accesses (e.g., access- ing a symbolic offset in an array), C OMMUTER ’s test