Airway trauma: a review on epidemiology, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis and treatment

R E V I E W

Open Access

Airway trauma: a review on epidemiology,

mechanisms of injury, diagnosis and treatment

Christos Prokakis

, Efstratios N Koletsis

, Panagiotis Dedeilias

, Fotini Fligou

, Kriton Filos

and Dimitrios Dougenis

Abstract

Airway injuries are life threatening conditions. A very little number of patients suffering air injuries are transferred live at the hospital. The diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion based on the presence of non-specific for these injuries symptoms and signs and a thorough knowledge of the mechanisms of injury. Bronchoscopy and chest computed tomography with MPR and 3D reconstruction of the airway represent the procedures of choice for the definitive diagnosis. Endotracheal intubation under bronchoscopic guidance is the key point to gain airway control and appropriate ventilation. Primary repair with direct suture or resection and an end to end anastomosis is the treatment of choice for patients suffering from tracheobronchial injuries (TBI). The surgical approach to the injured airway depends on its location. Selected patients, mainly with iatrogenic injuries, can be treated conservatively as long as the injury is small (<2 cm), a secure and patent airway and adequate ventilation are achieved, and there are no signs of sepsis. Patients with delayed presentation airway injuries should be referred for surgical treatment. Intraoperative evaluation of the viability of the lung parenchyma beyond the site of stenosis/obstruction is mandatory to avoid unnecessary lung resection.

Keywords:Trachea, Injury, Airway, Bronchoscopy, Primary repair, Surgery, Conservative, Delayed presentation

Introduction

Airway trauma is a life threatening condition which may be a result of blunt and penetrating injuries to the neck and chest, as well as medical procedures that may injure the airway. The presence of concomitant severe injuries and symptoms and signs which are no specific for this type of injury may delay the diagnosis and lead to early fatal outcome (ventilator failure, asphyxiation from airway obstruction, or death from tension pneumothorax) or late sequela such as airway stenosis and recurrent pulmonary infections [1]. Therefore, prompt diagnosis is mandatory for the survival of these patients. The treatment of these patients is similarly challenging: it includes, predominantly a secure and patent airway which will allow adequate ventilation and then the repair of the injury with a smaller impact on the respiratory function and the qual-ity of life of the patients [2].

The aim of this paper is to review the epidemiology, the mechanisms of injury, the diagnosis and the manage-ment of the patients suffering from airway injuries.

Review

Epidemiology

The true incidence of TBI is still unknown as 30–80% of these trauma victims still die at the scene of the accident [3]. Currently, the incidence of TBI among trauma pa-tients with chest and neck injuries, including those that died immediately, is estimated at 0.5-2% [4]. An antici-pated incidence of 3-6% for cervical trachea injuries should be assigned to penetrating neck injuries, whereas the incidence of airway injury in patients with penetrat-ing chest trauma ranges from <1% to 2% [5,6]. In a rela-tively recent report by Kummer et al. [7] the incidence of traumatic airway injury was 0.4% and 4.5% for blunt and penetrating traumas respectively. In a large autoptic study of 1187 trauma patients Bertelsen and Howitz [8] found 33 patients (0.03%) who had TBI; 27 of them died immediately after the accident and 24 had severe associ-ated injuries. However, this is a unique case since most autoptic studies have revealed airway injuries in 2.5-3.2% * Correspondence:ekoletsis@hotmail.com

1

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

of the victims [3]. The incidence of iatrogenic TBIs may be 1 event every 20.000-75.000 elective orotracheal intu-bations, increasing up to 15% when the procedure is emergently performed, and 0.2-0.7% for percutaneous dilatative tracheotomies [9,10]. In a relatively recent re-view Minambres et al. [11] reported, estimated incidence of tracheal rupture after endotracheal intubation, to be among 0.05% to 0.37% in the last decade.

The mortality from traumatic TBI’s has decreased from 36% before 1950 and 30% in 1966 to 9% in 2001 [3,12,13]. Finally, it is estimated that major co-existing injuries can be found in 40-100% of the trauma victims with TBI, and may have a significant impact on the final outcome of these patients [5,14]. In penetrating neck in-juries traumatizing the airway, rupture of the esophagus is the most common accompanying injury occurring in up to 43% of the patients [4].

Mechanisms of injury

The cervical trachea is at high risk for injury after pene-trating trauma to the neck. However, airway injuries at the neck may also result from blunt trauma. Neck hyper-extension can result in tracheal tears, paramedian verti-cal fractures of the larynx and trachea, and/ or even lead to complete laryngo-tracheal separation [2,15]. On the contrary direct blows usually injure the thyroid and cri-coids cartilages [16]. A specific type of injury combining both mechanisms is the one produced when neck hyper-extension from sudden deceleration during a vehicle ac-cident is followed by direct collision of the neck to the steering weal or the dashboard, the so called “padded dashboard syndrome” [15,17]. The trachea can also be injured when it’s violently compressed, along with the esophagus, against the cervical spine [5]. Finally, the trachea can be traumatized in front-on collision by the seat belt, and sometimes, by the sudden increase of intratracheal pressure against a closed glottis caused by the improper use of the seat belt [18].

In blunt chest traumas Kisser et al. [12] proposed three mechanisms for TBI’s. The first is the“explosive rupture” where, after the chest is crushed, there is a quick rise of the pressure in the airway while the glottis is reflexively closed. Once the pressure exceeds the elasticity of the tis-sues they explode. The second mechanism involves the development of shearing forces at fixed points of the air-way (cricoid cartilage and carina) due to its movement during sudden deceleration. The third one occurs when the chest is compressed along its anterior-posterior axis. As the lungs remain fixed to the chest wall because of the negative pressure existing between them and the parietal pleura, and the compression pulls them apart, excessive tensile forces may lacerate the airway at the level of the carina. In most cases the airway injury results from the combination of these three mechanisms. The

first mechanism mostly occurs in lacerations of the posterior wall, while the other two, and especially the last one, can clearly explain why 75-80%t of the injur-ies occur within 2.5 cm from the carina [2,3,19].

Clinical and radiological studies

The symptoms and signs of TBI depend on the site and the severity of the injury and most of them are not spe-cific for this kind of injury. Subcutaneous emphysema is the most common finding in TBI occurring in up to 87% of the patients [20]. Laceration of the mediastinal pleura and/or bronchial injuries may allow air to enter in the pleural cavity; pneumothorax occurs in 17-70% of the patients with TBI’s [21-23]. A massive air leak and the inability to re-expand the lung after tube thoracost-omy are highly indicative of a TBI [24]. Attempts to apply negative pressure to the chest tube may increase the air leak and deteriorate the respiratory function of the patient [2,23]. The air can also be trapped in the mediastinum and a crackling rumor concurrent with the heartbeat may be heard on the auscultation over the pre-cordium (Hamman’s sign) [25]. Dyspnea, tachypnea and respiratory distress are found in 59-100% of the patients [19,23], while haemoptysis can be seen in up to 74% of the cases [24]. Voice changes varying from hoarseness to aphonia may result from laryngeal fractures, laryngo-tracheal separation, vocal cord tears and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury [26]. Finally, air escape from a penetrating neck trauma should be considered diagnos-tic for airway injury [19,27].

The most common findings in chest x-rays are subcuta-neous emphysema, pneumomediastinum and pneumo-thorax. If subcutaneous emphysema exists and the hyoid bone appears high in the neck on lateral radiographics of the cervical spine there is high possibility for transection of the cervical trachea [28]. Other signs that may become apparent include: tracheal deformity, a defect in the tra-cheal contour, an endotratra-cheal tube out of place and the tube’s cuff over-inflated and protruding beyond the edge of the tracheal wall [14]. When the bronchus is circum-ferentially transected and detached the lung may col-lapse towards the diaphragm and posteriorly, below its hilar attachment, and not inwards like every other case of pneumothorax; this is the sign of the fallen lung and although rare it is diagnostic for bronchial injury [29]. It is believed that up to 10-20% of the patients with TBI may have no signs of TBI on chest x rays [13].

CT imaging with MPR/3D reconstruction of the images can significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure up to 94-100% [31,32]. Virtual bronshoscopy is a novel technique which comprises a computer generated volumetric reconstruction of the tracheobronchial tree based on MPR/3D images obtained during multi-slice CT imaging of the airway [33]. The technique simulates the findings at conventional bronshoscopy, and therefore it could represent a valid alternative for the evaluation of the airway, even for the detection of TBI in selected patients with more stable airway injuries [34,35].

Airway management and bronchoscopy

Although rapid sequence endotracheal intubation is frequent in trauma patients in those with airway injury may result disastrous. The pressure over a fractured cricoid may dislocate it enough to completely distort the upper airway, change the view of the physician per-forming the intubation or even lead to complete airway transection and obstruction [16]. Attempts to blindly over-pass an upper airway injury may worsen the laceration and/or create false passage of the tube [36]. Finally, intra-venous induction and neuromuscular blockade should be avoided since apnea and the loss of the smooth muscle tone may lead to complete collapse of an already trau-matized and distorted airway kept functional by the sur-rounding musculature [37,38]. Therefore, spontaneous breathing of the patient should be preferred until safe airway has been achieved.

As bronchoscopy represents the procedure of choice to locate the site of the rupture, its extension and depth, and to make sure that the tube’s cuff is inflated beyond the site of the injury, endobronchial intubation over a flexible bronchoscope is the preferred method for airway management and for the definitive diagnosis of a TBI [4,5,39]. Common findings of TBI include tearing of the wall, blood in the airway and collapsed airway with inabil-ity to view and assess the part of the tracheobronchial tree distally to the site of the injury [3,19]. Sometimes the view may be impaired by the presence of blood clots and tissue debris, and if critical airway stenosis exists the bron-choscope may itself precipitate airway obstruction [16,40]. Rapidly desaturating and/or hemodynamically unstable patients may not cooperate to perform the procedure without general anesthesia. In these scenarios rigid bronchoscopy as the patient receives inhalation induc-tion, while maintaining spontaneous ventilainduc-tion, may allow evacuation of blood and debris, good examination of the airway, bridging of an airway defect, and good ventilation in an already anesthetized patient [40,41]. The main limitation for rigid bronshoscopy is the need to extend the neck to the shoulder, which cannot be performed if cervical spine injury is suspected and/or has not been ruled out [13,16].

Injuries to the carina and main bronchi represent a challenging setting for airway management. Blind endo-tracheal intubation with the tube’s cuff inflated proxim-ally to the injury and positive pressure ventilation may increase the air leak and lead to severe respiratory insuffi-ciency and pending respiratory arrest [42]. Rapid broncho-scopic evaluation of the airway should be undertaken and once the site of the injury has been identified single lung ventilation should begin; the tube can be guided into the uninjured bronchus in case of a bronchial rupture, or we may use a double lumen tube to intubate the patient [3]. For patients suffering from post-intubation TBI to the distal trachea it has been reported that it’s possible to place small low pressure cuffed tubes into both bron-chi through the tracheostomy [43]. In extremis, urgent thoracotomy and placement of intrabronchial catheters in both bronchi through the chest wound may allow adequate ventilation in patients with distal airway in-juries rapidly desaturating despite the standard airway management procedures [44].

Tracheostomy is not routinely performed in airway trauma. It should be done under local anesthesia in patients with significant laryngo-tracheal injuries with complete or pending airway obstruction and when endotracheal intubation is considered unwise and un-safe as in the presence of concomitant craniomaxillofa-cial injuries [16,45]. Moreover, it should be performed in every patient with TBI after failed attempts for endo-tracheal intubation [2,46]. In patients with penetrating cervical tracheal injuries the insertion of a tracheos-tomy tube through the wound is the best way to secure the airway and spares tissue for future repair if this is deemed necessary [41].

Definitive management

Surgery

The rational for surgery can be summarized in: a. closing of the airway defect to improve ventilation, b. preventing mediastinal spillage and infection and c. avoiding spon-taneous healing complications which can lead to airway stenosis and recurrent pulmonary infections.

esophageal injuries [52]. The lower part of the intratho-racic trachea, the carina, the right bronchus and the proximal 2 cm of the left one are mainly approached via right thoracotomy at the 4thintercostal space. The alterna-tive includes median sternotomy followed by posterior transpericardial access to the airway once the ascending aorta and the superior vena cava have been mobilized [53]. Finally, abruptions of the left bronchus close to the bifurcation of the lobar bronchi are best treated via left thoracotomy [24].

Small tears and lacerations should be closed with direct sutures, while complete or partial transections require debridement of the infected and devitalized tissues, trimming of the edges of the injured airway and end to end anastomosis. Extensive circumferential mobilization of injury edges should be avoided because of the risk to devascularize the anastomosis and create healing problems with anastomotic dehiscence and/or later on airway sten-osis and subsequent infection [2]. The repair should be done with absorbable sutures with the knots tied on the outside to avoid the development of granulomas that may erode into the lumen [23,54]. Protective tissue flaps (peri-cardium, muscle flaps, pleura, mediastinal fat) can be used to cover the sutures or the anastomosis and separate them from the esophagus in combined trachea-esophageal in-juries [19,24,55]. When resection is necessary a tension free anastomosis can be performed by flexing the neck before the repair; the flexion should be maintained post-operatively by a chin to chest stitch until the anastomosis is healed. Other alternatives include laryngeal release maneuvers, division of the inferior pulmonary ligaments and pericardial release of the pulmonary hilum. Trache-ostomy through the wound is an alternative to primary repair in penetrating neck traumas with an anterior tra-cheal injury less than half of the airway’s circumference and/or involving up to 2 cartilaginous rings [56]. If there is extensive tissue damage and a large defect precluding primary repair an end tracheostomy must be created; the proximal trachea is closed and the distal one is cir-cumferentially sewed to the skin after fixing the trachea to the prevertebral fascia to avoid its retraction into the mediastinum [41]. An attempt for definitive repair can be performed later on. Finally, protective tracheostomy below the site of the repair should be done in laryngo-cricoid-tracheal injuries with suspected injury to both recurrent laryngeal nerves, when long term mechanical ventilation is anticipated and when the repair is consid-ered at risk for complications. Bronchial injuries are treated by applying the same principles. However, exten-sive bronchial damage, co-existing pulmonary vascular in-juries, and/or irreversible destruction of lung parenchyma may necessitate lung resection for the effective control of the injury [20,48]. Pneumonectomy in this setting is con-sidered a highly risky procedure; therefore, every attempt

should be made to minimize the loss of pulmonary functional tissue mainly by performing a bronchoplastic procedure [57-59] Although cardiopulmonary bypass is poorly tolerated by these patients because of the need for antigoagulation, selected rapidly desaturating and hemodynamically unstable patients with complex or combined airway and vascular injuries may benefit by the institution of cardiopulmonary bypass; the patient can be stabilized, the repair is done in better conditions and if hilar vascular injury co-exists the repair of the vessel can be feasible, thus avoiding the need for pneumonectomy [53,60-62].

When surgery is performed early after the injury the long term outcome is good for over 90% of the patients [5]. Table 1 summarizes both surgical techniques and outcome of patients undergoing surgery for airway in-jury. The 30 day mortality varies from 0% to 44.4% [39,47,49,63] and is primarily affected by the presence of concomitant injuries, the time between diagnosis and treatment and the need for pneumonectomy [12,57,64]. Although complications can be seen in up to 25.8% of the patients [48], major morbidity is mostly related to septic complications from long ICU recovery and anastomotic dehiscence [20,39,49,57]. Long term complications include airway stenosis [48], and phonation problems from injur-ies to the larynx and recurrent laryngeal nerves [65].

Conservative management

Table 1 Results of surgery in patients with traumatic airway injuries

Study No Operative approach Surgery Mortality Complications

Barmada (23) 7 R Thoracotomy: 5 L. pneumonectomy: 1 0% Wound infection: 2

L Thoracotomy: 2 ML. lobectomy: 1 Sputum retention: 1

Segmentectomy: 1

Primary suture: 4

Rossbach (19) 32 Collar incision: 16 Primary suture: 23 6% Pneumonia: 3

Collar + sternotomy:1 Tracheostomy: 3 Suture granuloma:2

Sternotomy: 5 Primary anastomosis: 2 Wound infection:1

R Thoracotomy: 9 R pneumonectomy: 2

L Thoracotomy: 1 ML Bilobectomy: 1

Cassada (39) 18 Collar Incision: 3 Primary suture: 13 5.6% Sepsis: 2

L cervicotomy: 5 Tracheostomy: 2 BPF: 1

Sternotomy: 1 Repair + tracheostomy: 1

R thoracotomy: 8 L. pneumonectomy: 1

L thoracotomy: 1 Lobectomy: 1

Mussi (47) 16 R thoracotomy: 5 Primary suture: 13 0% Suture granuloma: 1

Primary anastomosis: 2

Collar inciusion: 11 Thyroid cartilage suture: 1

Hofmann (49) 18 R thoracotomy: 17 Primary suture: 18 44.4% Suture dehiscence: 1

L thoracotomy: 1

Balci (48) 32 Thoracotomy: 19 Primary suture: 25 21.8% Atelectasis/pneumonia: 2/2

Sternotomy: 2 Primary anastomosis: 6 Prolonged air leak: 1

Clamshell: 1 RUL lobectomy: 1 Bleeding: 1

Neck incisions: 10 Empyema: 1

Wound infection: 1

Airway stenosis: 3

Richardson (57) 60 Cervical incision ± sternotomy: all laryngotracheals and most tracheal

Primary suture: 8 (2 laryngotracheal) 13.3%* Failed repair: 1

Primary anastomosis: 25 Phonation problems: 1

Thoracotomy: 24 bronchial injuries and some lower tracheal

Bronchial reconstruction: 10 Airway stenosis: 5

Pneumonectomy; 14 Empyema: 3 (BPF in 2)

Suture granuloma: 6

Delayed presentation: primary repair (1), resection and anastomosis (1), pneumonectomy (1)

Pulmonary hypertension/cor pulmonale: 3

Respiratory insufficiency: 1

Gomez-Caro (70) 11 Cervical incision: 3 Primary suture: 8 0%

Thoracotomy: 8 Primary anastomosis: 1

Tracheostomy: 1

R. pneumonectomy: 1

Koletsis (20) 22 Collar incision ± partial sternotomy: 11 Primary suture: 19 4.6% Airway stenosis: 1

Thoracotomy: 11 Primary anastomosis: 1 Sepsis: 1

L. pneumonectomy: 1 Phonation problems: 1

Conti et al. [43], cannot be performed the patient should be treated with surgery. Despite the favorable outcome reported so far, the patients should be under strict follow up and they should be referred to surgery if airway loss, inadequate ventilation or signs of infection and sepsis arise.

Delayed presentation injuries

Approximately 5% to 80% of the tracheobronchial injuries can be missed during the first 24–48 hours after the trauma because of the nonspecific nature of the presenting symptoms and the fact that an airway injury may some-times allow near normal ventilation [12,23,39,57,72]. With time the bronchus will be filled with fibro-granulation tis-sue and organizing hematoma. The natural history of these patients depends on whether an airway stenosis or a complete bronchial obstruction occurs. In the former re-current pulmonary infections may lead to bronchiectasis and destruction of the lung parenchyma, while in the later the lung distally to a completely obstructed bronchus is filled with mucus and protected from infections [12]. Pa-tients presenting with dyspnoea or recurrent pulmonary infections, a lobar or pulmonary opacification on chest x-rays and a history of major trauma should be evaluated via bronchoscopy; once a delayed TBI is diagnosed they should be referred for surgery. The choices for treatment include: 1). freshening of the edges of the injury and anas-tomosis in selected patients with early presentation [73], 2). bronchial sleeve resection [12] and 3). anatomic lung re-section in those patients with severely distorted lung par-enchyma [57]. It is essential that intra-operative evaluation of the viability of the pulmonary parenchyma is carried out, especially when the aspiration of the retained secre-tions can be followed by almost complete re-expansion of the atelectatic lung tissue. Protective, well vascularized, tissues should be used to buttress the anastomosis or the bronchial stump, mainly in patients with history of recurrent pulmonary infections. In a review of 27 patients undergoing elective surgery for delayed presentation of TBI between 1996 and 2007 Glazer et al. [74] reported that there was no perioperative death and the radiological and functional outcome was excellent in most patients.

Conclusions

Although airway trauma is still highly lethal, good out-come can be expected after surgical treatment. However,

basic prerequisites for that are an early diagnosis based on a high index of suspicion, thorough knowledge of the mechanisms of injury and early attainment of a safe and patent airway. Primary repair with intent to restore the integrity of the airway, minimize the loss of pulmonary parenchyma, maintain vocal function and avoid perman-ent tracheostomy should be the scope of every attempt to surgically treat an airway trauma. The surgical approach to the injury should be dictated by its location as found during bronchoscopy. Selected patients, mostly with iatro-genic injuries can be treated conservatively; strict follow up is necessary and surgery should be undertaken once airway loss, inadequate ventilation or infection/sepsis occurs. Delayed presentation airway injuries should be treated either with bronchial sleeve resection or formal anatomic lung resection; attention should be made intra-operatively for the evaluation of the viability of the pul-monary parenchyma distally to the site of the injury to avoid unnecessary major lung resection.

Abbreviations

MPR:Multiplanar reformatting; TBI: Tracheobronchial injury; PEEP: Positive end-expiratory pressure.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’contributions

All authors: 1) have made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2) have been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and 3) have given final approval of the version to be published.

Author details

1

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece.2_{Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,}

Evaggelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.3Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Patras, School of Medicine, Patras, Greece.

Received: 13 April 2014 Accepted: 23 June 2014 Published: 30 June 2014

References

1. Rollins RJ, Tocino I:Early radiographic signs of tracheal rupture.AJR Am J Roentgenol1987,148:695–698.

2. Dougenis D:Trauma of the tracheobronchial tree.Arch Hellen Med2002,

19:258–269.

3. Johnson SB:Tracheobronchial injury.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008,

20:52–57.

4. Riley RD, Miller PR, Meredith JW:Injury to the esophagus, trachea and bronchus. InTrauma.5th edition. Edited by Moore EE, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004:539–552.

5. Karmy-Jones R, Wood DE:Traumatic injury to the trachea and bronchus.

Thorac Surg Clin2007,17:35–46. Table 1 Results of surgery in patients with traumatic airway injuries(Continued)

Carretta (63) 30 Transcervical-transtracheal: 13 Primary suture: 29 3.3% Pneumonia: 3

Thoracotomy: 16 Primary anastomosis: 1 Phonation problems: 2

Transcercical-transtracheal + thoracotomy:1 Tracheo-esophageal fistula

recurrence: 1

*75% for patients treated with pneumonectomy.

6. Wood DE:Tracheal Bronchial Trauma. InThoracic Trauma and Critical Care.

Edited by Karmy-Jones R, Nathens A, Stern AJ. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002:109–123.

7. Kummer C, Netto FS, Rizoli S, Yee D:A review of traumatic airway injuries: potential implications for airway assessment and management.Injury

2007,38:27–33.

8. Bertelsen S, Howitz P:Injuries of the trachea and bronchi.Thorax1972,

27:188_–194.

9. Gomez-Caro A, Moradiellos Diez FJ, Ausin Herrero P, Díaz-Hellín Gude V, Larrú Cabrero E, De Miguel Porch E, Martín De Nicolás JL:Successful conservative management in iatrogenic tracheobronchial injuries.Ann Thorac Surg2005,79:1872–1878.

10. Schneider T, Volz K, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H:Incidence and treatment modalities of tracheobronchial injuries in Germany.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2009,8:571_–576.

11. Minambres E, Buron J, Ballesteros MA, Llorca J, Muñoz P, González-Castro A:

Tracheal rupture after endotracheal intubation: a literature systematic review.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2009,35:1056_–1062.

12. Kiser AC, O’Brien SM, Detterbeck FC:Blunt tracheobronchial injuries: treatment and outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg2001,71:2059–2065. 13. Chu CP, Chen PP:Tracheobronchial injury secondary to blunt chest trauma:

diagnosis and management.Anaesth Intensive Care2002,30:145–152. 14. Euathrongchit J, Thoongsuwan N, Stern EJ:Non vascular mediastinal

trauma.Radiol Clin North Am2006,44:251_–258.

15. Milner A:The airway in face, head, and neck injury.SAJAA2008,14:52–57. 16. Hurford WE, Peralta R:Management of tracheal trauma.Can J Anesth2003,

50(suppl):R1_–R6.

17. Nelson LA:Airway trauma.Int Anesthesiol Clin2007,45:99_–118. 18. Rathlev NK, Mezdon R, Bracken ME:Evaluation and management of neck

trauma.Emerg Med Clin North Am2007,25:679–694.

19. Rossbach MM, Johnson SB, Gomez MA, Sako EY, Miller OL, Calhoon JH:

Management of major tracheobronchial injuries: a 28 year experience.

Ann Thorac Surg1998,65:182_–186.

20. Koletsis E, Prokakis C, Baltayiannis N, Apostolakis E, Chatzimichalis A, Dougenis D:Surgical decision making on the basis of clinical evidences and the injury_’s anatomical setting.Injury2012,43:1437_–1441. 21. Kelly JP, Webb WR, Moulder PV, Everson C, Burch BH, Lindsey ES:

Management of airway trauma I: tracheobronchial injuries.Ann Thorac Surg1985,40:551–555.

22. Baumgartner F, Sheppard B, De Virgilio C, Esrig B, Harrier D, Nelson RJ, Robertson JM:Tracheal and main bronchial disruptions after blunt chest trauma: presentation and management.Ann Thorac Surg1990,

50:569_–574.

23. Barmada H, Gibbons JR:Tracheobronchial injury in blunt and penetrating chest trauma.Chest1994,106:74–78.

24. Gabor S, Renner H, Pinter H, Sankin O, Maier A, Tomaselli F, Smolle Jüttner FM:Indications for surgery in tracheobronchial ruptures.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2001,20:399–404.

25. Wong EH, Knight S:Tracheobronchial injuries from blunt trauma.ANZ J Surg2006,76:414–415.

26. Camnitz PS, Shepherd SM, Henderson RA:Acute blunt laryngeal and tracheal trauma.Am J Emerg Med1987,5:157_–162.

27. DuBose J, Demetriadis D:Penetrating Injuries to the Neck: Operation, Observation and Angiointervention. InAnaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency A.P.I.C.E.Edited by Gulo A. Italy: Springer-Verlag; 2008:111–127. 28. Stark P:Imaging of tracheobronchial injuries.J Thorac Imaging1995,

10:206_–219.

29. Savas R, Alper H:Fallen lung sign: radiographic findings.Diagn Interv Radiol2008,14:120–121.

30. Chen JD, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Killeen KL, Dutton RP:Using CT to diagnose tracheal rupture.AJR Am J Roentgenol2001,176:1273–1280. 31. Scaglione M, Romano S, Pinto A, Sparano A, Scialpi M, Rotondo A:Acute

tracheobronchial injuries: impact of imaging on diagnosis and management implications.Eur J Radiol2006,59:336–343.

32. Faure A, Floccard B, Pilleul F, Faure F, Badinand B, Mennesson N, Ould T, Guillaume C, Levrat A, Benatir F, Allaouchiche B:Multiplanar

reconstruction: a new method for the diagnosis of tracheobronchial rupture?Intensive Care Med2007,33:2173_–2178.

33. Horton KM, Horton MR, Fishman EK:Advanced visualization of the airway with 64-MDCT: 3D mapping and virtual bronchoscopy.AJR Am J Roentgenol2007,189:1387–1396.

34. Moriwaki Y, Sugiyama M, Matsuda G, Toyoda H, Kosuge T, Uchida K, Fukuyama H, Iwashita M, Morimura N, Suzuki J, Yamamoto T, Suzuki N:

Usefulness of the 3-dimensionally reconstructed computed tomography imaging for diagnosis of the site of tracheal injury (3D-tracheography).

World J Surg2005,29:102–105.

35. Visvikis GA, Hinricks CR, Shah K:Virtual endoscopy for evaluation of tracheal laceration.Emerg Radiol2002,9:162_–164.

36. Baumgartner FJ, Ayres B, Theuer C:Danger of false intubation after traumatic tracheal transection.Ann Thorac Surg1997,63:227–228. 37. Abernathy JH III, Reeves ST:Airway catastrophes.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol

2010,23:41–46.

38. Cicala RS, Kudsk KA, Butts A, Nguyen H, Fabian TC:Initial evaluation and management of upper airway injuries in trauma patients.J Clin Anesth

1991,3:91–98.

39. Cassada DC, Munyikwa MP, Moniz MP, Dieter RA Jr, Schuchmann GF, Enderson BL:Acute injuries of the trachea and main bronchi: importance of early diagnosis.Ann Thorac Surg2000,69:1563–1567.

40. Chhabra A, Rudigwa P, Panneer Selvam SR:Pathophysiology and management of airway trauma.Trends Anaesth Crit Care2013,3:216–219. 41. Corneille MG, Stewart RM, Cohn SM:Upper airway injury and its

management.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008,20:8_–12.

42. Devitt JH, Boulanger BR:Lower airway injuries and anaesthesia.Can J Anaesth1996,43:148–159.

43. Conti M, Pougeoise M, Wurtz A, Porte H, Fourrier F, Ramon P, Marquette CH:

Management of postintubation tracheobronchial ruptures.Chest2006,

131:412–418.

44. Naghibi K, Hashemi L, Sajedi P:Anesthetic management of

tracheobronchial rupture following blunt chest trauma.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2003,47:901_–903.

45. Verschueren DS, Bell RB, Bagheri SC, Dierks EJ, Potter BE:Management of laryngo-tracheal injuries associated with craniomaxillofacial injuries.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg2006,64:203_–214.

46. Wu MH, Tsai YF, Lin MY, Hsu IL, Fong Y:Complete laryngotracheal disruption caused by blunt injury.Ann Thorac Surg2004,77:1211–1215. 47. Mussi A, Ambrogi MC, Ribechini A, Lucchi M, Menoni F, Angeletti CA:Acute

major airway injuries: clinical features and management.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2001,20:46_–52.

48. Balci AE, Eren N, Eren S, Ulkü R:Surgical treatment of post-traumatic tracheobronchial injuries.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2002,22:984–989. 49. Hofmann HS, Rettig G, Radke J, Neef H, Silber RE:Iatrogenic ruptures of

the tracheobronchial tree.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2002,21:649–652. 50. Lancelin C, Chapelier AR, Fadel A, Macchiarini P, Dartevelle PG:

Transcervical-transtracheal endoluminal repair of membranous tracheal disruptions.Ann Thorac Surg2000,70:984–986.

51. Mussi A, Ambrogi MC, Menconii G, Ribechini A, Angeletti CA:Surgical approaches to membranous tracheal wall lacerations.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2000,120:115–118.

52. Demetriades D, Velmahos GG, Asensio JA:Cervical pharyngoesophageal and laryngotracheal injuries.World J Surg2001,25:1044–1048. 53. Symbas PN, Justicz AJ, Ricketts RR:Rupture of the airways from blunt

trauma: treatment of complex injuries.Ann Thorac Surg1992,54:177_–183. 54. Taskinen SO, Salo JA, Haltunnen PEA, Sovijärvi AR:Tracheobronchial

rupture due to blunt chest trauma: a follow up study.Ann Thorac Surg

1989,48:846_–849.

55. Feliciano DV, Bitondo CG, Mattox KL, Romo T, Burch JM, Beall AC Jr, Jordan GL Jr:Combined tracheoesophageal injuries.Am J Surg1985,150:710–715. 56. Pate JW:Tracheobronchial and esophageal injuries.Surg Clin North Am

1989,69:111–123.

57. Richardson JD:Outcome of tracheobronchial injuries: a long term perspective.J Trauma2004,56:30_–36.

58. Jalal A, Jeyasingham K:Bronchoplasty for malignant and benign conditions: a retrospective study of 44 cases.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2000,

17:370–376.

59. Richardson JD, Miller FB, Carrillo EH, Spain DA:Complex thoracic injuries.

Surg Clin North Am1996,76:725_–748.

60. Hirsh J, Gollin G, Seashore J, Kopf G, Barash PG:Mediastinal tamponade of a tracheal rupture in which partial cardiopulmonary bypass was required for surgical repair.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth1994,8:682_–684.

62. Pereira SJ, Narrod JA:Repair of right pulmonary artery transection after blunt trauma.Ann Thorac Surg2009,87:939–940.

63. Carretta A, Melloni G, Bandiera A, Negri G, Voci C, Zannini P:Conservative and surgical treatment of acute posttraumatic tracheobronchial injuries.

World J Surg2011,35:2568–2574.

64. Flynn AE, Thomas AN, Schecter WP:Acute tracheobronchial injury.

J Trauma1989,29:1326–1330.

65. Roxburgh JC:Rupture of the tracheobronchial tree.Thorax1987,

42:681–688.

66. Schneider T, Storz K, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H:Management of iatrogenic tracheobronchial injuries: a retrospective analysis of 29 cases.

Ann Thorac Surg2007,83:1960–1964.

67. Jougon J, Ballester M, Choukroun E, Dubrez J, Reboul G, Velly JF:

Conservative treatment of postintubation tracheobronchial rupture.Ann Thorac Surg2000,69:216–220.

68. Lamp L:Tracheobronchial injuries. Conservative management.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2004,3:401–405.

69. Kuhne CA, Kaiser GM, Flohe S, Beiderlinden M, Kuehl H, Stavrou GA, Waydhas C, Lendemanns S, Paffrath T, Nast-Kolb D:Nonoperative management of tracheobronchial injuries in severely injured patients.

Surg Today2005,35:518–523.

70. Gomez-Caro Andres A, Ausin Herrero P, Moradiellos Diez FJ, Díaz-Hellín V, Larrú Cabrero E, Pérez Antón JA, De Nicolás JL M:Medical and surgical management of noniatrogenic traumatic tracheobronchial injuries.

Arch Bronconeumol2005,41:249–254.

71. Leoncini G, Iurilli L, Boni L, Blanco G, De Bellis P, Catrambone G:Treatment of iatrogenic and traumatic tracheal disruptions.Monaldi Arch Chest Dis

2008,69:119–127.

72. Chen D, Han L, Hu Y, Yin H, Zhao H, Li H:Diagnosis and treatment of bronchial rupture from blunt thoracic trauma.Chin Med J (Engl)2001,

114:540–541.

73. Demir A, Olcmen A, Kara HV, Dincer SI:Delayed diagnosis of a complete bronchial rupture after blunt thoracic trauma.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2006,54:560–562.

74. Glazer ES, Meyerson SL:Delayed presentation and treatment of tracheobronchial injuries due to blunt trauma.J Surg Educ2008,

65:302–308.

doi:10.1186/1749-8090-9-117

Cite this article as:Prokakiset al.:Airway trauma: a review on

epidemiology, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis and treatment.Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery20149:117.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution