• No results found

High-Availability Enterprise Network Design

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "High-Availability Enterprise Network Design"

Copied!
58
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

© 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

505

0911_04F9_c3

High

High

-

-

Availability

Availability

Enterprise Network

Enterprise Network

Design

Design

haviland

(2)

2 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Staying On Target

Staying On Target

HA Focus

HA Focus

vs

vs

Distractions!

Distractions!

“Flat networks

are easier”

beware!

Five

nines is

job one!

Inherited

complexity

hard to purge

The latest

cool stuff

older is more

stable

“Variety”

of vendors,

protocols,

designs, etc.

“Feature

rich”

let’s use all

the knobs!

Change is hard,

sometimes $$$

(3)

3 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

HA Features of the Catalyst 6500

HA Features of the Catalyst 6500

Consider for Backbones & Server Farms

Consider for Backbones & Server Farms

Fabric Redundancy

switch fabric module

in CatOS 6.1

Supervisor Redundancy

HA feature in CatOS 5.4.1

stateful recovery

image versioning on the fly

MSFC Redundancy

config-sync feature

IOS 12.1.3 CatOS 6.1

(4)

4 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Thinking Outside the Box

Thinking Outside the Box

For HA/HP design

“outside the box”

the logical design

is critical

network features

& protocols

geophysical

diversity is powerful

Inside:

“HA”,

RAID,

UPS,

MTBF,

etc.

(5)

5 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Dramatis

Dramatis

Personae

Personae

Our Cast of Symbols

Our Cast of Symbols

Links

GE, DPT, SONET, etc.

L2 switching

L2 forwarding in hardware

L3 switching

L3/L2 forwarding in hardware

Routing

L3 forwarding (SW or HW)

Control plane = IOS

routing protocols & features

QoS where required

Application intelligence

Catalyst 4000

Cisco 7500

Cisco 12000

Catalyst 6500

(6)

6 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Client

Blocks

Distribution L3 Access L2

HA Gigabit Campus Architecture

survivable modules + survivable backbone

Backbone

Server

Block

Server Farm Distribution L3 Access L2 E or FE Port GE or GEC Ethernet or ATM Layer 2 or Layer 3

Define

the mission

critical parts

first!

(7)

7 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

High Availability Design

High Availability Design

Why a

Why a

Modular ABC Approach

Modular ABC Approach

Many new products, features,

technologies

HA and HP application operation is

the goal

Start with modular, structured

approach

(the “logical” design)

(8)

8 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Price per 10/100

Catalyst 2912G Catalyst 2948G Catalyst 2980G

24

24

10/100 Ports

10/100 Ports

Gigabit Ports

Gigabit Ports

24-500+

24-500+

24-350+

24-350+

3-38+

3-38+

8-64+

8-64+

Catalyst 5XXX

32-96

32-96

6-12

6-12

Catalyst 4XXX

$100 $200 $250 $300 $350

Switching Capacity

Switching Capacity

20 Mpps20 Mpps Up to 72 MppsUp to 72 Mpps Up to 150 MppsUp to 150 Mpps

Backplane

Backplane

24 Gbps24 Gbps 1.2-3.6 + 10Gbps1.2-3.6 + 10Gbps 250+ Gbps250+ Gbps

New

New

New

New

New

New

Modules

Modules

Catalyst 6XXX

Design the Solution

Design the Solution

Then Pick the Products

Then Pick the Products

New

New

Modules

(9)

9 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

HA Design Reality Check!

HA Design Reality Check!

Assume Things Fail

Assume Things Fail

-

-

Then What?

Then What?

Networks are complex

Things break, people make mistakes

What happens if a failure occurs?

Simple, structured, deterministic design

required for fast recovery

The “tradeoffs”

(10)

10 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Layer 2

Layer 2

Layer 2

Layer 2

Access Access Distribution Distribution Building Building Core L3 Core L3 Server Server Distribution Distribution Server Farm Server Farm

Layer 3

Layer 3

3 2 1 5 6

Branches

Branches

WAN WAN backup 4

Network Recovery

Network Recovery

How Long? What Happens?

(11)

11 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Failure

Scenario

Failure

Scenario

1,2 server

3,4 uplink

5,6 core

dual-path L3

EtherChannel

L3 routing

L2 general

DPT

1,2 server

3,4 uplink

5,6 core

dual-path L3

EtherChannel

L3 routing

L2 general

DPT

Recovery

Mode

Recovery

Mode

Recovery

Time

Recovery

Time

Server NIC

HSRP (& UplinkFast)

HSRP track

alternate path used

channel recovery

EIGRP or OSPF

L2 spanning tree

IPS

Server NIC

HSRP (& UplinkFast)

HSRP track

alternate path used

channel recovery

EIGRP or OSPF

L2 spanning tree

IPS

< 2 seconds

tune to 3 seconds

tune to 3 seconds

< 2 seconds

< 1 second

depends on tuning

tune (up to 50 seconds)

50 milliseconds

< 2 seconds

tune to 3 seconds

tune to 3 seconds

< 2 seconds

< 1 second

depends on tuning

tune (up to 50 seconds)

50 milliseconds

Network Recovery Times

Network Recovery Times

If You Follow the Rules

(12)

12 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Design for High Availability

Design for High Availability

How to Build Boring Networks!

How to Build Boring Networks!

The Concepts

The Rules

Design Building Block

Design Backbone

(13)

13 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

HA Network Design Concepts

HA Network Design Concepts

thinking outside the box

thinking outside the box

1)

Simplicity & Determinism

2)

Collapse the Sandwich

3)

Spanning Tree Failure Domain

4)

Map L3 to L2 to L1

5)

Scaling and Hierarchy

6)

ABCs of Module + Backbone

Design

(14)

14 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

1) Simplicity and Determinism

1) Simplicity and Determinism

reducing the degrees of freedom

reducing the degrees of freedom

Every Choice Affects Availability!

Determinism or Flexibility?

Would you support 27 desktop environments?

Would you support 13 network vendors?

Would you use 57 varieties of Cisco IOS?

Flexible

Complex

Varied

Simple

Structured

Deterministic

“HA Continuum”

(15)

15 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Traditional

Model

Fiber

SONET

Big Fat Pipe

Lower equipment cost

Lower operational cost

Simplified architecture

Scalable capacity

Optical

Internetworking

Fiber

IP

FR/ATM

IP

2)

2)

Collapse the Sandwich

Collapse the Sandwich

route IP over glass

route IP over glass

Service

Traffic

Eng

Fiber

Mgmt

(16)

16 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

3

3

)

)

Minimize the Failure Domain

Minimize the Failure Domain

public enemy number one

public enemy number one

Where should root go?

What happens when

something breaks?

How long to converge?

Many blocking links

Large failure domain!

Broadcast flooding

Multicast flooding

Loops within loops

ST from heck

Times 100 VLANs?

avoid highly meshed, non-deterministic large scale L2 = VLAN topology

Building 1

Building 2

(17)

17 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

4)

4)

Map L3 to L2 to L1

Map L3 to L2 to L1

Easier administration & troubleshooting

Clients in subnet 10.0.55.0

VLAN 55

wiring closet “55” on floor 55

access switch “55”

interface VLAN 55

all match and life is good

go fishing with your kids

10/100 BaseT GE or GEC

(18)

18 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

5) Scaling and Hierarchy

5) Scaling and Hierarchy

Strong hierarchies

like telephone

system and

Internet segment

addressing and

therefore scale

U

C

N

U

C

N

U

C

N

C complexity U unmanageable N number of devices

Flat L2 Ethernet is

easy but does not

scale

ATM LANE is

logically flat, scales

as N squared

(19)

19 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

6)

6)

Building Block &

Building Block &

Backbone Design ABCs

Backbone Design ABCs

WAN

Ecommerce

Solution

PSTN

Distribution

Distribution

Core

Core

LAN Access

LAN Access

Distribution

Distribution

Server Farm

Internet

A design bb

B design BB

C connect bb to BB

Divide and conquer

Cookie cutter

configuration

Deterministic

L3 demarcation

WAN Access

WAN Access

(20)

20 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

7) Four Square Network Redundancy

7) Four Square Network Redundancy

or the Four Corners Problem

or the Four Corners Problem

One Chassis

One Chassis

Two Chassis

Two Chassis

One

One

Supervisor

Supervisor

Two

Two

Supervisors

Supervisors

Simplest

Simplest

No Redundancy

No Redundancy

Most Complex

Most Complex

Belt and Suspenders

Belt and Suspenders

GeoPhysical

GeoPhysical

Effective

Effective

When space

When space

is limited

is limited

“HA”

“HA”

L3

L3

(21)

21 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Dos and Don’ts for HA Design

Dos and Don’ts for HA Design

1)

Eliminate STP Loops

2)

L3 Dual-Path Design

3)

EtherChannel Across Cards

4)

Workgroup Servers

5)

Use HSRP Track

6)

Passive Interfaces

7)

Issues with Single-Path Design

8)

Oversubscription Guidelines

9)

HA for single attached servers

10)

Protocol Tradeoffs

(22)

22 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 1) Eliminate STP Loops

Rule 1) Eliminate STP Loops

in the backbone and mission critical points

in the backbone and mission critical points

No blocking links to

waste bandwidth

Avoids slow STP

convergence

Very deterministic

Routed links not VLAN

trunks

L2 Gigabit switch in

backbone

subnet X = VLAN X

Too many cooks spoil the broth

L3 control is better

X.2 X.3

X.1

Root

VLAN X

(23)

23 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 2) Dual Equal

Rule 2) Dual Equal

-

-

Cost Path L3

Cost Path L3

Load balance - don’t waste bandwidth

unlike L1 and L2 redundancy

Fast recovery to remaining path

detect L1 down & purge - about 1s

Works with any routed fat pipes

Path A

Path B

Destination

network X

Equal cost

routes to X

Path A

Path B

(24)

24 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 3)

Rule 3)

EtherChannel

EtherChannel

Across Cards

Across Cards

Increased availability

Sub second recovery

Spans cards on 6500

Up to 8 ports in channel

Small complexity increase

Single L2 STP link

Single L3 subnet

(25)

25 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 4a) Connect Workgroup Server

Rule 4a) Connect Workgroup Server



With no L2 recovery path, what happens if link

breaks ….

Workgroup server X.100

attached to distribution layer

L2 path to client X.1

Client X.1

VLAN X in purple

includes clients

and workgroup

servers attached

at different places.

A

B

C

Links to core

Link CB

breaks ….

(26)

26 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 4b) Connect Workgroup Server

Rule 4b) Connect Workgroup Server

Subnet X now discontiguous

Incoming traffic gets dropped

Workgroup server X.100

attached to distribution layer

L2 path to client X.1

Client X.1

Routers A & B continue to

advertise reachability of

subnet X ...

A

B

C

X.1 not

reachable

X.100 not

reachable

(27)

27 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 4c) Connect Workgroup Server

Rule 4c) Connect Workgroup Server

Introduce L2/STP redundancy

Adds a loop (band-aid fix)

Workgroup server X.100

attached to distribution layer

L2 path to client X.1

Client X.1

•VLAN trunk AB forms L2 loop

•recovery path for STP

•prevents black hole

A

B

(28)

28 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 4d) Connect Workgroup Server

Rule 4d) Connect Workgroup Server

Real Lessons:

Enterprise Server Farms

are better

L3 demarcation is better

Example of why extended

(29)

29 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 5a) Use HSRP Track

Rule 5a) Use HSRP Track

Review - Hot Standby Router Protocol

Fast recovery can be tuned to 3s or less

X is M.100 HSRP Primary Priority 200 Y ( becomes M.100) HSRP Backup Priority 100

Z

Router X acts as gateway

router for subnet M, IP address M.100. If link Z fails router Y will take over as M.100 gateway with same MAC address

10/100 BaseT GE or GEC

Subnet M

(30)

30 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 5b) Use HSRP Track

Rule 5b) Use HSRP Track

Track extends HSRP to monitor links to backbone

Ensures shortest path - best outbound gateway

Track interface A - lower priority 75 Track interface B - lower priority 75 HSRP triggers if both A and B lost

10/100 BaseT GE or GEC X is M.100 HSRP Primary Priority 200 Y ( becomes M.100) HSRP Backup Priority 100

Z

Subnet M hosts M.1 M.2 M.3

A

B

(31)

31 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 6a) Use Passive Interfaces

Rule 6a) Use Passive Interfaces

L3 switches X & Y in distribution layer

4 VLANs per wiring closet

10 wiring closets

X Y

ABCD EFGH IJKL MNOP

… Ten total

Wiring closet switch Distribution

switch

(32)

32 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 6b) Use Passive Interfaces

Rule 6b) Use Passive Interfaces

What X and Y see is 4*10=40 routed links

Increased protocol overhead & CPU

X Y A C B D E F G Etc. A.1 C.1 B.1 D.1 E.1 F.1 G.1 Etc. A.2 C.2 B.2 D.2 E.2 F.2 G.2 Etc.

(33)

33 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 6c) Use Passive Interfaces

Rule 6c) Use Passive Interfaces

Turns off routing updates & overhead

Leave two routed links for redundant paths

CDP, VTP, HSRP etc. still function on all links

X Y A C B D E F G Etc. A.1 C.1 (passive) B.1 (passive) D.1 (passive) E.1 F.1 (passive) G.1 (passive) Etc. A.2 C.2 (passive) B.2 (passive) D.2 (passive) E.2 F.2 (passive) G.2 (passive) Etc.

(34)

34 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 7a) Issues With Single Path

Rule 7a) Issues With Single Path

Designs

Designs

L3 engine MSFC on

core-X reloads

Lights are on but

nobody home - HSRP

does not recover

Remove passive

interface to wiring

closet subnets A, B

Provide longer routed

recovery path

Single path to core GE Subnet A Subnet B X HSRP primary Core L3 Access L2 Y New, longer outbound routes

Outbound case ...

(35)

35 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 7b) Issues with Single

Rule 7b) Issues with Single

-

-

Path

Path

Design

Design

Recovery must take

place in both

directions

Routing protocol

recovers longer route

from X to subnets A, B

Therefore dual-path L3

is better & faster than

single-path

Single path to core GE Subnet A Subnet B X HSRP primary Core L3 Access L2 Y New, longer routes to A, B

Inbound case ...

(36)

36 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 8a)

Rule 8a)

Oversubscription

Oversubscription

Guidelines

Guidelines

Oversubscription part of

all networks - not bad

Non-blocking switches

do not mean a

non-blocking network

You determine the

amount of “blocking”

GE GE Non-blocking design GE GE Blocking design 2:1 GE

(37)

37 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 8b)

Rule 8b)

Oversubscription

Oversubscription

Guidelines

Guidelines

Oversubscription rules

of thumb work well

20:1 at wiring closet

Less in distribution and

server farm

QoS required IFF

congestion occurs

Protect real time flows

at congested points

n:1 20:1 Core L3 use non-blocking switches Dual-link GEC 200 100BaseT GE 8 uplinks Distribution L3

(38)

38 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 9) Dual Supervisors

Rule 9) Dual Supervisors

HA for Single Attached Servers

HA for Single Attached Servers

Single point of failure

Dual supervisors - fast stateful recovery

No increase in complexity

10/100 BaseT GE or GEC

Single attached server

mission critical application

HA dual supervisors

Catalyst 6XXX

(39)

39 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 10)

Rule 10)

Protocol Tradeoffs

Protocol Tradeoffs

Automatic or Manual Configuration

Automatic or Manual Configuration

Configuration up front rather

than CPU overhead later, for

example:

set VTP mode transparent

set/clear VLANs for each trunk

set trunks on or off

set channel on or off

Choose flexibility or

(40)

40 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Rule 11)

Rule 11)

UniDirectional

UniDirectional

Link

Link

Detection

Detection

UDLD detects mismatch when physical layer

checks out OK

Prevents various failure conditions including

crossed wiring

Tx Fiber

Rx Fiber

The lights

are on,

BUT …..

(41)

41 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Building Block Means Survivable

Building Block Means Survivable

Self

Self

-

-

contained Backbone

contained Backbone

Autonomous Survivability

Unit - HSRP

L3 Broadcast Multicast

demarcation

Cookie cutter configuration

L3 Demarcation of failure

domain

Simple, repeatable,

deterministic

Redundancy adds 15% cost

at mission critical points like

server farm

L2

L3

ASU

delimits

failure

domain

(42)

42 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Building Block Templates

Building Block Templates

Use “As Is” or Combine

Use “As Is” or Combine

1)

Standard Model

simple, structured

2)

VLAN Model

more flexible

3)

Large Scale Server Farm

Model

accommodate dual NIC

4)

Small Scale Server Farm

Model

(43)

43 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

1) Standard Building Block

1) Standard Building Block

no loops

no loops

-

-

no STP complexity

no STP complexity

HSRP Primary Subnets/VLANs 10, 12, 14, 16 HSRP Primary Subnets/VLANs 11, 13, 15, 17 Access L2 root switch VLAN 10/11 Subnet 10 Subnet 11 GE/GEC VLAN Trunks 10/100 BaseT

GE or GEC Dual Path with Tracking

Subnet 12 Subnet 13 Subnet 14 Subnet 15 Subnet 16 Subnet 17

Highly Deterministic

L1 maps L2 maps L3

No blocking links

Shortest path always

Not “flexible”

(44)

44 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

2) VLAN Building Block

2) VLAN Building Block

make L2 design match L3 design

make L2 design match L3 design

All

All

VLANs

VLANs

terminate at L3 boundary

terminate at L3 boundary

STP root VLANs 10 12 14 16 HSRP primary subnets 10 12 14 16 STP root VLANs 11 13 15 17 HSRP primary subnets 11 13 15 17

L2

L3

All VLANs All Subnets GE/GEC VLAN Trunks

Dual Path with Tracking

All VLANs All Subnets All VLANs All Subnets All VLANs All Subnets L2 Path 10/100 BaseT GE or GEC

More flexible

FO forwarding odd BE blocking even etc. FE BO FO BE FE BO FO BE FE BO FO BE FE BO FO BE

L2

L3

Uplink-Fast

(45)

45 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

3) Large

3) Large

-

-

Scale Server Farm

Scale Server Farm

Building Block

Building Block

Dual-NIC Server

Example Fault Tolerant Mode (FTM) Same IP Address - seamless recovery

GE/GEC

VLAN Trunks

Dual Path with Tracking L2 Path Access L2 UplinkFast 10/100 BaseT GE or GEC

based on VLAN building block

aggregates traffic - high BW

L2

L3

L2

L3

STP root VLANs EVEN HSRP primary subnets EVEN STP root VLANs ODD HSRP primary subnets ODD

(46)

46 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

4) Small

4) Small

-

-

Scale Server Farm

Scale Server Farm

Building Block

Building Block

Dual-NIC Server

Example Fault Tolerant Mode (FTM) Same IP Address - seamless recovery

Dual Path with Tracking L2

Path

10/100 BaseT GE or GEC

Simplified building block with

no STP loops

Use if port density permits

Use if no oversubscription

(non-blocking) is a

requirement

L2

L3

L2

L3

HSRP primary subnets EVEN HSRP primary subnets ODD

(47)

47 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Redundant Backbone Models

Redundant Backbone Models

all good

all good

-

-

increasing scale

increasing scale

1)

Collapsed L3 Backbone

2)

Full Mesh

3)

Partial Mesh

4)

Dual-Path L2 Switched

(48)

48 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Core L3

Access L2

1) Collapsed L3 Backbone

large building or small campus

Clients

Collapsed

Backbone

GE/GEC

Scale depends on

physical plant and

policy more than

performance

Server Farm

10/100 BaseT GE or GEC

(49)

49 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Client

Blocks

Distribution L3 Access L2

2) Full Mesh Backbone

small campus - n squared limitation

Server

Block

Distribution L3 Access L2 Note importance of passive wiring closet interfaces in meshed designs! 2 blocks - 6 peerings 3 blocks - 15 peerings 4 blocks - 28 peerings 5 blocks - 45 peerings E or FE Port GE or GEC

(50)

50 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Distribution/Core L3 Access L2

Client

Blocks

Distribution L3 Access L2

3) Partial Mesh Backbone

3) Partial Mesh Backbone

medium campus

medium campus

-

-

traffic flow to server farm

traffic flow to server farm

Server

Block

E or FE Port GE or GEC Predominant traffic pattern

(51)

51 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

4) Dual

4) Dual

-

-

Path L2 Switched Backbone

Path L2 Switched Backbone

no STP loops or VLAN trunks in core

no STP loops or VLAN trunks in core

South

Client

Blocks

Dual L2 Backbone

Distribution L3 Core L2 Access L2 “red” core subnet=VLAN=ELAN “blue” core subnet=VLAN=ELAN West North E or FE Port GE or GEC

(52)

52 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

5a) Benefits of a L3 Backbone

5a) Benefits of a L3 Backbone

Multicast PIM routing control

Load balancing

No blocked links

Fast convergence EIGRP/OSPF

Greater scalability overall

Router peering reduced

(53)

53 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Distribution L3 Access L2

5b) Dual-Path L3 Backbone

largest scale, intelligent multicast

Core L3

Server

Farm

Block

Distribution L3 Access L2

All routed links, consider subnet count !

Client

Block

E or FE Port GE or GEC

(54)

54 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Restore Considerations

Restore Considerations

Restoring can take longer in

some cases more complex

-schedule

On power up L1 may come up

before L3 builds routing table

-temporary black hole for HSRP

Use “preempt delay” for HSRP

Restoring can take longer in

some cases more complex

-schedule

On power up L1 may come up

before L3 builds routing table

-temporary black hole for HSRP

(55)

55 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Campus Failover Layer 2

Campus Failover Layer 2

Recovery & Tuning

Recovery & Tuning

STP

Tune ‘diameter’ on

root switch

Improves recovery

time maxage

PortFast

Server or desktop

ports only 1 s

Move directly from

linkup into

forwarding

UplinkFast

No tuning, 2

seconds, wiring

closet only

Only applies with

forwarding &

blocking link

Backbonefast

Converges 2 sec +

2xFwd_delay for

indirect link failures

Eliminates maxage

timeout

(56)

56 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Campus Failover Layer 3

Campus Failover Layer 3

Recovery & Tuning

Recovery & Tuning

Caution with

aggressive tuning

Good when network

is stable, highly

summarized

HSRP

(fast LAN links)

Tune hello timer 1

sec, dead timer 3 sec

<4s to converge

OSPF

(fast LAN links)

Tune hello timer 1

sec, dead timer 3 sec

<4s to recognize

problem, then

converge

EIGRP

(fast LAN links)

Tune hello timer 1

sec, hold timer 3 sec

<4s to recognize

problem, then

converge

(57)

57 505

0911_04F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Keeping Networks Available!

Keeping Networks

Available!

KISS - eliminate complex L2

ASU - building blocks

Redundant backbone

Redundant L3 paths

(58)

58 505

References

Related documents

Around 32% of cases have been detected at their admission and are ranked as principal diagnosis “PRD”; for the remaining cases, 52.2% showed symptoms and/or clinical manifesta-

Chapter III examines the tradition of the prelude and fugue from Bach and his contemporaries to present-day composers, considering examples of others who have followed in

This additional information can play a crucial role in reducing the statistical uncertainty about both parameter and capital estimates in situations where observed data are

When a change is detected on the local master, the synchronization node sends all information needed to replicate this change on a remote master to the other synchronization

Symposium: April 18 – 19, 2016 Doctoral workshop: April 17, 2016 Toronto, Canada www.cssi2016.com Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: Rethinking goals,

Establish HR as a true partner in advancing and driving business goals, and enhance your value as both a member of your senior management team and a leader of the human

Students absenting themselves from the hostel beyond specified hours without prior permission from Warden will be considered as a case of indiscipline

• Recall from Chemistry 11: o Avogadro’s Hypothesis: Equal volumes of different gases, measured the same temperature and pressure, have equal numbers of particles.. PCl 3 (g) +