• No results found

Stable Value Market to 2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Stable Value Market to 2013"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Tony Camp

Voya Financial

TM

Stable Value Products

Registered Representative of Voya Financial Partners, LLC Member SIPC

September 22, 2014

City of San Jose

(2)

Stable Value Market - 2007 to 2013

2007 to 2009

 Mortgage crisis spurns 2008 capital market meltdown

 Large positive flows to stable value funds

 Banks and some insurers exit stable value wrapper market

 Stable Value Managers dependent upon outside wrappers cannot fully invest

 Two very large Pooled Collective Trust Funds liquidate

– SSGA, Merrill Lynch

– Wrap capacity for pooled funds is impaired

 QDIA – DOL selects Target Date Funds, Balanced Funds and Managed Accounts as QDIAs for ERISA plans

2012 to 2013

 Goldman Sachs purchases Dwight and Deutsche stable value books of business

 Low interest rates persist – stable value crediting rates remain superior to cash

 De-risking of stable value funds/strategies

– Movement from core to intermediate core

 Shorter duration/caps

– Reduction/elimination of below investment grade securities

– Smaller caps on sectors/issuer exposure

 Dodd/Frank Issue

(3)

Stable Value Market - 2014

2014

 Most portfolios have recovered nicely from problems in 2008, focus is now protecting portfolios from long anticipated rise in rates

– How can I protect my stable value fund from a rise in rates and still credit a competitive yield?

 Cash flows – most plans net zero or negative – caused in part by hot equity market in 2013/2014

 Wrap capacity update:

– Some new entrants with tougher contract terms

– Banks continue exiting market

– Insurance companies are now primary issuers of wraps

 Low interest rates persists - crediting rates lower but still provide a good spread to cash

 De-risking stable value funds/strategies started in 2009 – majority of market has been de-risked

 Regulatory issues add some uncertainty, but market is generally optimistic that Stable Value offered through insurance companies will be exempted

 NAIC Regulation

– NAIC Sub-Group looking into changing the reserve model for Separate Account and Synthetic GICs

 Separate Account Insulation

– NAIC looking at viability of separate account insulation for insurance products – NAIC has just closed comment period – ACLI, CAI and AAA all commented in favor of retaining insulation

 GAO

– The GAO is researching the effectiveness and usage of QDIA alternatives (since 2007 DOL ruling), the addition of Stable Value as the fourth QDIA may be considered

(4)

Voya

TM

Stable Value Strategy - Selective Growth

Product Breadth

– Voya has multiple Stable Value Products shelf ready in all markets to fund various size mandates (401/457/403b)

– All products designed to comply with FASB requirements for book value accounting and are in compliance with CT 38a-459/NY Reg. 128 (S-GIC and SA-GIC Regulations)

– Products available “Investment Only” or with Plan Administration

Voya’s Stable Value Wrap Capacity

– Voya continues to issue stable value wrap contracts

– Voya can deploy wrap capability when needed – not dependent upon external firms for capacity

Stable Value Asset Management

– Investment management expertise in stable value/long term track record

– 20+ years in several strategies

– Focus on growing AUM

Underwriting Discipline

– Demographic and cashflow profile of plan and stable value investors

– Investment guidelines

– Market to book ratio

Selective Growth of Book

– Bid on mandates that fit company risk profile

(5)

Voya Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company

Stable Value Product Suite

General Account

 Guaranteed credited rates provided by ILIAC  Credited rate announced in advance

Fixed Account

$25.6B2

Synthetic GIC

 Off-balance sheet product ILIAC provides the guarantee or “wrap”

 Assets are primarily managed by “outside” fund manager

MCA

$29.4B1

Separate Account GIC

 Separate Account “insulation”

 ING provides wrap and investment management

Stabilizer

$8.2B1

(6)

Our Financial Strength

Key Facts and Figures Financial Strength Ratings4 for Voya’s Life Companies As of March 2014: A- Outlook Positive As of July 2014:AOutlook Positive As of March 2014: A- Outlook Positive As of May 2014:A3Outlook Positive

Shareholder’s Equity of $14,818 million

Top 10 in public life insurance company statutory capital1

Estimated combined RBC ratio of 501%; above target of 425%2

Approximately $90 billion of assets in the investment portfolio

Debt to Capital ratio of 23.2%3

1. Based on U.S. life insurance total adjusted capital as of December 31, 2013; Ranking based on publicly-traded insurers; Source: SNL

2. Estimated combined RBC ratio primarily for our four principal U.S. insurance subsidiaries; pro-forma for the effects of upstreaming $722 million in ordinary dividends to the holding company in 2Q’14, estimated combined RBC ratio would be approximately 552% (this does not take into account any related impacts to deferred tax assets) 3. Refer to the 2Q'14 supplement for financial leverage reconciliation

4. Insurance financial strength ratings for ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company, ING USA Annuity & Life Insurance Company, ReliaStar Life Insurance Company, ReliaStar Life Insurance Company of New York, and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company; for all insurance financial strength ratings, refer to the 1Q'14 supplement at investors.voya.com

Standard

& Poor’s

Fitch

Ratings

A.M. Best

Moody’s

As of June 30, 2014, unless otherwise noted

(7)

-10,000,000.00

-5,000,000.00

0.00

5,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

City of San Jose

(8)

City of San Jose

Historical Crediting Rates

Period Floor Rate Participant Net Credited Rate Period Floor Rate Participant Net Credited Rate 10/06/2006 – 12/31/2007 5.80% 5.80% 07/01/2012 – 09/30/2012 1.00% 1.75% 01/01/2008 – 12/31/2008 5.00% 5.00% 10/01/2012 – 12/31/2012 0.00% 2.01% 01/01/2009 – 09/30/2010 3.00% 3.00% 01/01/2013 – 03/31/2013 0.00% 2.25% 10/01/2010 – 12/31/2010 2.75% 2.75% 04/01/2013 – 06/30/2013 0.00% 2.38% 01/01/2011 – 03/31/2011 2.50% 2.50% 07/01/2013 – 09/30/2013 0.00% 2.46% 04/01/2011 – 06/30/2011 2.25% 2.38% 10/01/2013 – 12/31/2013 0.00% 1.78% 07/01/2011 – 09/30/2011 2.00% 2.45% 01/01/2014 – 03/31/2014 0.00% 1.97% 10/01/2011 – 12/31/2011 1.75% 1.84% 04/01/2014 – 06/30/2014 0.00% 1.97% 01/01/2012 – 03/31/2012 1.50% 2.00% 07/01/2014 – 09/30/2014 0.00% 2.13% 04/01/2012 – 06/30/2012 1.25% 2.00%

(9)

City of San Jose

Position as of August 31, 2014

Plan

Market Value

(MV)

Book Value

(BV)

MV – BV

MV/BV

Deferred Compensation

$200,369,548

$198,701,752

$1,667,796

100.8%

PTC Deferred Compensation

$15,653,731

$15,407,163

$246,568

101.6%

Lifestyle

$31,563,211

$31,198,347

$364,864

101.2%

Total

$247,586,490

$245,307,262

$2,279,228

100.9%

Participant Blended Net Crediting Rate: 2.13%

City of San Jose Portfolio

Yield: 2.60%

(10)

City of San Jose

Historical Crediting Rate vs U.S. Treasury Rates

(1)

0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 03/14 06/14 07/14 2 Year Treasury 5 Year Treasury 10 Year Treasury Blended Gross Crediting Rate Blended Net Crediting Rate

(1) Annualized month end market yield on U.S. Treasury securities at 2, 5, and 10-year constant maturity, quoted on investment

References

Related documents

For the sequences QCIF, CIF and SD which are classified in low bitrate region with the increment in bitrate, the three standards converge to approximate similar value in terms

Cohen Mimis : IPRAS Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board Honorary Chairman Cohen Mimis Course Director Tsoutsos Dimosthenis Course Co-organizer Yiacoumettis Andreas Members

Stable Value contract holders (the plan sponsor) and participants are creditors of the insurer, and do not have priority claim status on the General Account assets of the

• Prepare a written business plan for your locksmithing business • List several possible sources of financing for your business • Explain the importance of accessibility for a

91IA016 E608 Trans Ova Genetics Sioux Center Iowa ECT, FIV B. 91KS028 E726 Sun Valley Embryo Transfer,PA Salina Kansas

1.Using ½” open /close wrench , attach the antenna mount to the pole in a general direction using any kind of azimuth device, compass, etc. Secure the antenna to the antenna

Charles categorizes her project by quoting Oz and Sosik “the project had been completed, but the system is not fully used by its intended users.” Then she lists reasons why

У випадку критичної ситуації пасажири Polo можуть покластися на комплексну систему захисту, до якої входять фронтальні подушки безпеки водія