RO/RO Ships
Manuel Ventura
Ship Design I
MSc in Marine Engineering and Naval Architecture
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 2
Summary
• Definition
• Types of RO/RO Ships
• Profile and evolution of the fleet
• Relevant aspects of design
– Arrangement of the accesses and garage zone – Cargo types and characteristics
– Specific equipment for securing of roll-on/roll-off cargo – Damaged Stability: Criteria and assessment
– Safety (SOLAS): Prevention and extinguishing of fire in the garage zone
• Annex A. Significant Ships
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 3
RO/RO Ships (1)
Roll-On/Roll-Off Ships
- ships where the cargo is wheeled or is
loaded/unloaded on board in vehicle or
platforms equipped with wheels
• The first ships of this type were the Ferry, equipped with
railways to allow the transport of train carriages between the
margins of the rivers that were too wide for bridges
• One of the first ferry ships
was the Forfarshire, across
the Firth of Forth, in
Scotland, built in 1861
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 4
RO/RO Ships (2)
• The WWII has motivated
the development of this
type of ships for the
landing of military
equipment
• After the war many of
those military ships were
converted for operation as
merchant ships, such as
the LST (Landing Ship
Tank) MV Virginia Beach
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 5
RO/RO Ships (3)
• The use of the RO/RO concept in merchant ships started in
the late 1940’s, early 1950’s, mainly in short-sea routes
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 6
Types of RO/RO Ships
• Ferries
• Freight
• Ro-Pax
• Pure Car Carriers
• Combined carriers
– Container Ro/Ro
– Ro/Ro Lo/Lo
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 7
Ferry
Cariiage of Passengers and Vehicles
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 8
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 9
Freight Ro/Ro
Transport of Wheeled Cargo
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 10
Ro-Pax
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 11
Pure Car Carrier (PCC)
The largest PCC currently in service is the MV Mignon (1999), from Wallenius Lines, which after a lengthening of 28 m (2005) has the capacity to carry about 7,200 cars.
• Ships quite sensitive to the side winds due to the large exposed area • Present a large number
of ventilators on the exposed deck due to the SOLAS
requirements for the garage zove
Car Transport
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 12
Pure Car Truck Carrier (PCTC)
Transport Cars and Trucks
Loa = 198 mLpp = 188 m B = 32.20 m D = 14.60 m T = 8.80 m DW = 16,957 t Courageous Ace (2003) 6400 cars
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 13
Container Ro/Ro (ConRo)
Generally carries stacks of containers on the upper deck and wheeled cargo under deck
ConRo Trader (1978) Loa = 109.60 m DW = 4,550 t
Combined Ship, Container Carrier and Ro/Ro
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 14
Ro/Ro Lo/Lo
Ship that can carry and load wheeled cargo, but that also has
lifting equipment to load/unload through the hatches
CEC Oceanic (1997) Loa = 100.90 m DW = 5,150 t
Profile and Evolution of the Fleet
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 16
World Fleet of Ro/Ro Ships
Notes:
• Only Ro/Ro cargo ships • Units: [1,000 tdw] Change [%] 2006 2005 65.6 48.5 54 36 36 19 32 70 Added to Fleet -8.7 0.6 6865 6823 6754 7520 7522 8172 World Fleet Same period prev. year Prev. Period Jul. April Jan. Oct. Jul. April
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 17
Recent Evolution of the Fleet
1.6 2.5 275 0.7 6,865 1.5 9,747 2.9 1302 Jul. -10.2 2.6 273 0.7 6,754 1.5 9,559 2.8 1296 Jan. 2006 -9.4 3.1 301 0.8 7,522 1.8 10,960 2.9 1258 Jul. 0.9 3.4 318 0.9 8,301 2.1 12,896 3.0 1215 Jan. 2005 0.7 3.6 319 1.0 8,224 2.2 12,597 3.0 1235 Jul. 9.6 3.6 311 1.0 8,171 2.1 12,246 3.0 1239 Jan. 2004 1.3 3.9 301 0.9 7,459 2.0 10,888 2.9 1137 Jul. 0.9 4.1 301 0.9 7,365 2.0 10,628 2.9 1128 Jan. 2002 [%DWT] [%] Tot 1,000 TEU [%] Tot 1,000 DWT [%] Tot 1,000 GT [%] Tot No. Ships
Source: ISL Market Review 2006 – Merchant Fleet Data
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 18
Evolution of the Capacity Ro/Ro
• Global growth of abt. 14% in 3 years
• Increase of capacity concentrated in established markets
_____ + 182 ____ 1473 ____ 1291 Total all routes
+ 23 222 199 Inter-continental + 1 109 108 Intra Americas + 33 60 27 Intra Asian (exc. ferries)
+ 53 447 394 Intra Mediterranean + 51 573 522 Intra European NW Absolut Growth 2006 2003 1,000s lane metres
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 19
Comparison of Ships Ro/Ro Cargo - RoPax
• Increasing trends to build RoPax ships
– Market of passenger ferries declining due to the low cost air transport companies
– RoPax ships present a larger increase in the intra-European low cost transport Only Cargo Ropax + 10% 74 67 + 27% 235 185 Change 2006 2003
Capacity of service (lane metres)
Source: MDST Containership Databank
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 20
Arrangement of Access Way and Garage
Zones
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 22
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 23
External Access Ramp
Ramp angle < 12º
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 24
Internal Access Ways
• Capacity expressed in total lane length
• Parking space requirements:
4.7 2.0 height [m] * 15.0 (double wheels) 12.0 (single wheels) 2.8 ~ 3.1 10.0, 12.0, 15.0 Trucks 1.0 2.2 ~ 2.5 4.0 ~ 5.5 Cars Load [t/axis] width [m] length [m]
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 25
Parking Spaces
• For road trailers, semi-trailers and roll trailers the width of
the lane is typically 2.90 m
• The width of the cargo space should be a multiple of 2.90 m
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 26
Internal Ramps
• The slope of the internal ramps is normally between 1 :7 to 1
: 10 (abt. 8° – 6°) and the width should be carefully selected
in relation to the cargo stowed at each deck.
• Widths between 7 and 12 meters are used in the large ships
• Anti-skid surfaces are important.
Initial Dimensioning Guidelines
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 28
Length Estimate
•
Ro/Ro Cargo Ships
•
Ro/Ro Passenger Ships
(
1000
)
/
25
110
+
−
=
Lm
Lpp
Lm = Lane length [m]Ncars = max. Number of cars
Ncars > 500 Lpp = 150 + (Ncars - 500)/10 320 < Ncars < 500 Lpp = 130 + (Ncars - 320)/9 100 < Ncars < 320 Lpp = 80 + (Ncars - 100)x(5/22) Ncars < 100 Lpp = 30 + (Ncars - 15)x(10/17)
Kristensen, Hans Otto (2006), “Cargo Transport by Sea and Road – Technical and Economical Environmental Factors, Naval Engineers Journal, Vol.118, No.3.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 29
Typical Midship Section Configurations
Overseas Ro/Ro Shortsea Ro/Ro
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 30
Deck Configuration
• The number of decks increases with ship size.
• For ships up to about 15000 tdw, 2 decks are most common.
• Bigger ships have often 3 permanent decks.
• Movable car decks are frequently installed in between the
permanent decks.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 31
Ro/Ro Deck Configurations (1)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 32
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 33
Trailers – Stowage in Lanes
Ro/Ro for Carriage of Trailers (Semi-Reboques) - Stowage
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 35
Cargo Equipment for Ro/Ro Ships (1)
RO/RO ships require a wide range of access equipment.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 36
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 37
Cargo Equipment for Ro/Ro Ships (2)
• Bow doors
• Bow ramps
• Internal doors
• Hoistable car
decks
• Hoistable car
ramps
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 38
Ramps/Bow Access Doors
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 39
Ramps/Stern Access Doors
Quarter ramp, which allows access with the ship in a peer
(without Ro/Ro terminal)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 40
Ramps/Bow Access Doors
• Bow ramp “Folding Frame Type”
• Allows a complete separation of the door in the collision bulkhead from the remainder of the ramp
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 41
Bow Ramp Folding Frame Type
Opening sequence of the bow ramp.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 42
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 43
Internal Ramps
Internal ramps typically have
inclination of abt. 7°
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 44
Internal Doors
Watertight door designed for the subdivision of the cargo
spaces with a minimum of interference
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 45
Movable Car Decks
• Intermediate decks of lightweight
construction that allow the stowage of cars inside the deck for heavy vehicles
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 46
Moveable Car Decks
• There are 2 types of moveable car decks:
– Hoistable Car decks– with integrated lifting device, electrically or hydraulically driven
– Liftable Car Decks- do not have integrated lifting mechanism, they are moved by lifts of the scissors type
Liftable Car Deck Hoistable Car Deck
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 47
COREX Cardecks
• Stainless steel sandwich panels from MacGreggor • A 3D truss-core is built-up
between top and bottom panels
• Compared with conventional steel cardecks they have about 1/3 of the depth and about ½ of the weight
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 48
Cargo Lifts
• Lifts to carry vehicles between
decks, in ships where the longitudinal
space is limited
• There are configurations in which the
platform itself works as watertight
hatch cover when secured in its lower
position
• Types of cargo lifts: • Scissors
• Telescopic • Chain driven
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 49
Cargo Handling
MAFI Trailer
Connection System
Used to move containers on chassis in the terminals
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 50
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 51
Tugmaster
www.kalmarind.se Goose neck
Terminal Tractor
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 52
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 53
Truck and Semi-Trailer
1.2 m Tandem axle spread
6.2 m Wheelbase Truck Tractor 2.5 – 2.6 m Width 23.0 m Overall Length 16.2 m Length 2.6 m Overall Width Semi-Trailer 4.15 m Overall Height
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 54
Semi-Trailers
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 55
Trailer Trestle
• A terminal trailer trestle
is a device which releases
the towing truck for more
productive use while the
semi-trailer is loaded or
unloaded in a terminal.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 56
Cassettes for Containers
• The cassettes are detachable steel platforms, which containers can be loaded on for transporting.
• The containers can be double-stacked so that either 2x40ft or 4x20ft containers can be moved. This cassettes are able to handle 80 tons (there are examples of120-ton versions used in the steel industry).
• One of the advantages of using cassettes is that they act as a “floating” buffer, since containers can be placed on the cassettes with or without being coupled to a vehicle.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 57
Cassettes
cassette translifter
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 58
Translifter
www.ttsgroup.com
• A translifter is a
steerable lifting
trailer which can be
used with pallets or
trestles
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 59
Types of Cargo (1)
•
Road Trailer -
Including tractor and the trailer with
the container on top. The dimensions, including allowances,
are 12.5 m x 3.0 m x 4.5 m. Weight of 30 – 35 t and centre
of gravity at 3.0 m height.
Load
: 15.0 t/axle, 1.3 m distance between axis.
•
MAFI trailer -
Platforms for cargo towing, moved by
tractors designated byTugmasters.
Load
: 18.0 t/axle, 0.7 m distance between axis.
•
Tugmaster -
Tractor for moving cargoes in the
terminals and in the ship.
Load
: 21.0 t/axle.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 60
Types of Cargo (2)
•
Palette-
Rectangular shaped structure where the cargo
is stowed. Many different sizes, with rectangular shapes
whose sides vary in a range from 0.8 m to 1.5 m. The size
currently more used is 1.25 m x 1.0 m. The height of the
cargo depends from the stowage conditions but can be
assumed a value of 1.8 m to 2.0 m from the base, including
the pallette.
•
Car -
Change a lot, but for European cars, average
values of 4.5 m x 2.0 m x 1.7 m can be assumed, with an
average weight of 1.0 t and max. of 2.0 t.
•
SECU -
(Storabox unit) specialized container for the
carriage of paper, with dimensions 13.8 m x 3.6 m x 3.6 m
and weight of 90t.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 61
Types and Characteristics of Cargo (1)
100 20.0 1.0 2.0 1.4 1.6 4.0 Car EU 80 11.0 10.0 35.0 4.5 2.5 12.3 40’ Trailer 80 14.0 10.0 22.0 4.5 2.5 6.1 20’ Trailer 80 16.0 10.0 38.0 4.4 2.5 15.0 Truck (articul.) 80 16.0 10.0 24.0 4.4 2.5 11.0 Truck 30 16.0 8.0 10.0 2.2 1.3 4.0 4 t Paletes 30 12.5 54.0 57.0 4.4 3.2 9.0 20’ Contentor Speed Max. [km/h] Slope Max. [%] Load/ axis [t] Weight Max. [t] Height Max. [m] Width [m] Length [m] Type Cargo
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 62
Types and Characteristics of Cargo (2)
30 11.0 10.0 40.0 4.5 3.9 6.0 1 TEU Straddle carrier 30 14.0 30.0 60.0 4.6 3.7 9.0 1 TEU Side carrier 15 11.0 48.0 247.0 5.9 4.9 18.8 8 TEU/ 2 layers Tractor LUFmaster 15 14.0 2 x 13.0 52.0 3.4/6.0 4.7 14.0 40’ Wagon w/ container Speed Max. [km/h] Slope Max. [%] Load/ axis [t] Weight Max. [t] Height Max. [m] Width [m] Length [m] Type Cargo
Vehicle Securing
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 64
IMO Guidelines – Securing Points
•
Guidelines for Securing Arrangements for the Transport
of Road Vehicles on Ro-Ro Ships
.
• Apply to Ro-Ro ships which carry road vehicles on either long
or short international voyages in unsheltered waters
• Are applicable to:
– Road vehicles with an authorized total mass of vehicle and cargo between 3.5 and 40 t
– Articulated road trains with an authorized total mass not more than 45 t
• The decks shall be provided with
securing points
with:
– Longitudinal spacing < 2.5 m – Transverse spacing 2.8 < S < 3.0
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 65
Securing Points on Decks
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 66
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 67
IMO Guidelines – Lashing
• Lashing shall consist of chain or any other device made of
steel or other material with equivalent strength and
elongation characteristics
• The strength of lashing without permanent deformation
should not be less than
120 KN
• Lashings should be attached to the securing points with
hooks
or other devices
• Lashings should only be attached to the secure points
• The angle between the lashings and the horizontal and
vertical planes shall be preferably between 30° and 60°
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 68
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 69
Trailer and Truck Lashing
Chain lashing
Web lashing
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 70
Accidents due to Improper Lashing
Accident due to an articulated vehicle being only lashed at the 4 corners (www.shipownersclub.com)
Aspects of Hull Structural Design
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 72
Scantlings of Decks for Wheeled Cargo (BV)
The thickness of plate panels submitted to wheeled cargoes shall no be less than the following, in [mm]:
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 73
Scantlings of Decks for Wheeled Cargo (BV)
When the tyre print area, AT, is not known, can be used the value in [m2] computed by the expression:
with:
n – number of wheels on the plate panel
QA– load in t/axis
nW– number of wheels in the axis considered
PT– pressure of the tyres [kN/mm2] (When the value is knot known, use the ones from Table 6)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 74
Scantlings of Decks for Wheeled Cargo (BV)
In the vehicles where the 4 wheels of the axis are on the plate panel (Figure 1) the plate thickness shall be the largest of the values obtained from the following expressions:
Damaged Stability
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 76
Accidents with Ro/Ro Ships
• Princess Victoria (1953), 135 casualties
Estonia (1994), 852 casualties
Herald of Free Enterprise (1987), 193 casualties
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 77
Damaged Stability (1)
• The shipwreck of the “Harald of Free Enterprise”, in 1987, called the attentions for the damaged stability of Ro/Ro ships, which are characterized for NOT having watertight subdivision above the main deck
• In a first approach R&D has focused on the residual stability of existing ships and in the identification of the main causes of the shipwrecks
• The sinking of the “Estonia” has increase the urge to find solutions • Measure of Survivability– Critical height of the water on deck.
Based in probabilistic concepts.
• The total probability of survival has 2 factors:
– The probability that a given compartment is flooded – The probability that the ship survives to that flooding
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 78
Damaged Stability (2)
• The probability of survival can be divided in 2 factors:
– The probability of surviving the pure lost of stability, moments of heel, displacement of the cargo and angle of heel
– The probability of surviving the effect of the water accumulated on deck due to the action of the waves
• The computation of this last factor designated by survival
factor with water on deck, s
W, is based in the concept of the
critical height of the wave at which capsize (sossobrar)
occurs, and so s
Wis just the probability that this wave
height is not exceeded
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 79
Static Equivalent Method (SEM)
• Based on the results from experimental tests it was determined that the capsizing happens at an heeling angle close to ΘMax, the
angle corresponding to the maximum value of the righting moment • ΘMaxis determined by the traditional constant displacement
method, allowing the progressive flooding of the car deck until the immersion of the deck at side
• Based in these assumptions, it was developed the Static Equivalent Method(SEM), that allows the calculus of the critical amount of water accumulated on deck from the results of static stability computations
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 80
Static Equivalent Method
with:
hcrit– difference in height between the internal and external waterlines HScrit– critical significative wave
height
• It is considered a flooding scenario in which the ship has a only a damage under the car deck, but there is a quantity of water accumulated on the deck, considered intact
• The critical amount of water is the one that takes the ship to assume an equilibrium heeling angle equal to ΘMax
Safety – Impact of SOLAS
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 82
Fire Prevention and Extinguishing
• In Ro/Ro ships, the closed decks for wheeled cargo shall have levels of protection equivalent to machinery spaces
– Must be limited by class A boundaries (in steel or equivalent material) – Closed spaces to be protected by a fixed fire extinguishing system,
typically CO2 in cargo ships and sprinklers (DeLuge system) in car ferries
– Smoke detection system
– Open cargo decks do not require a fixed fire extinguishing system – Portable systems and hoses
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 83
Ventilation of Cargo Spaces for Vehicles
• The ventilation system of the cargo spaces shall be
completely segregated from the others ventilation systems
• In ships with a number of passengers <N>, the system shall
guarantee
– N > 36 -> 10 renewals/hour – N ≤36 -> 6 renewals/hour
Source: SOLAS Chap. II-1 Regulation 38 – Cargo Spaces for Motor Vehicles
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 84
Conclusions from the Analysis of the
Fires
• In accordance to SOLAS, the large fires are rare in ships and the casualties are generally related with situations when the
passengers are in the interior of the vehicle during the voyage (which is no longer acceptable by SOLAS and by the ISM code) • Many of the big fires started when the ship is in port, during load
or unload. The detection system is often temporarily switched off and the CO2 can not be released quickly by the system because the ramps (internal and external) are still open
• The reliability of the low pressure CO2 systems for cargo space is generally quite low
• The sprinkler systems for Ro/Ro decks in Ferries have shown good results
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 85
Fires in Ro/Ro Ships (1990-2003)
Source: DNV, “Fires on Ro-Ro Decks”, DNV Technical Paper, 2005
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 86
Fires in Ferries (1990-2004)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 87
Bibliography (1)
• Boulougouris, V., Papanikolaou, A., Zaraphonitis, G., “Optimization of Arrangements of Ro-Ro Passenger Ships with Genetic Algorithms”, Journal Ship Technology Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2004.
9 DNV, “Guidelines - Design and Classification of Roll On/Roll Off Ships”, 1988.
• DNV, “Fires on RoRo Decks”, DNV Technical Paper, 2005 9 Kreuzer, E.; Schlegel, V. and Stache, F. (2007), "Multibody
Simulation Tool for the Calculation of Lashing Loads on RoRo Ships", Journal of Multibody System Dynamics, Vol.18, No.1, August, 2007. (CD-ROM#52)
9 Krinstensen, Hans Otto (2006), “Cargo Trasnport by Sea and Road Technical and Economical Envoronmental Factors”, Naval Engineers Journal, Vol.118, No.3. (CD-ROM#83)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 88
Bibliography (2)
• Papanikolaou, A., Spanos, D., Boulougouris, E., Eliopoulou, E., Alissafaki, A., “Investigation into the Sinking of the Ro- Ro Passenger Ferry Express Samina”, Journal International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2004.
9 Ravn, Erik Sonne (2003), “Probabilistic Damaged Stability of Ro/Ro Ships”, PhD Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark.
• Turnbull, Stuart R. (2004), “Roll-on/roll-off semi-trailer models: a comparison of results”, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol.5, No.3, Feb. 2004, pp. 101-106.
• Vassalos, D., Papanikolaou, A., "Stockholm Agreement - Past, Present, Future (Part 1)", Journal Marine Technology, Vol. 39, No. 3, July 2002, pp. 137-158.
• Vassalos, D., Papanikolaou, A., "Stockholm Agreement - Past, Present, Future (Part 2)", Journal Marine Technology, Vol. 39, No. 4, Oct. 2002, pp. 199-210.
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 89
Relevant IMO Guidelines and Codes
• IMO Resolution A.533(13) - Elements to be taken into
account when considering the Safe Stowage and Securing of
Cargo Units and Vehicles in Ships
9
IMO Resolution A.581(14) (1985) - Guidelines for Securing
Arrangements for the Transport of Road Vehicles on Ro-Ro
Ships.
9
IMO MSC.1/Circ.1355 (2010) - Amendments To The
Guidelines For Securing Arrangements For The Transport of
Road Vehicles on Ro-Ro Ships (Resolution A.581(14))
• IMO Resolution A.714(17) (1991) Code of Safe Practice for
Cargo Stowage and Securing (CSS Code)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 90
Relevant Links
Suppliers of Ro/Ro Equipment • www.macgregor-group.com • www.nordana.com
• www.tts-technology.no Other
Annex A. Significant Ships
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 92
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 93
Ro/Ro Ferry (2)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 94
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 95
Ro/Ro Ferry (4)
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 96
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 97
MV Tamesis
M.Ventura RO/RO Ships 99
Some Relevant ISO Standards
• ISO 9367-1:1989 - Lashing and securing arrangements on road vehicles for sea transportation on Ro/Ro ships -- General requirements -- Part 1: Commercial vehicles and combinations of vehicles, semi-trailers excluded
• ISO 9367-2:1994 - Lashing and securing arrangements on road vehicles for sea transportation on Ro/Ro ships -- General requirements -- Part 2: Semi-trailers