• No results found

Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner"

Copied!
41
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner

(2)

 Established 1948

 Authorized by Congress

 Eight signatory States (IL, IN, NY, KY, OH, PA, VA, WV)

 “Pledge cooperation” to abate interstate water pollution in Ohio River valley compact district  Created ORSANCO to coordinate and implement

(3)

 3/state (gubernatorial appointments); 3 federal (Presidential appointments)

 State EPA director ex-officio

 One federal is EPA Regional Administrator  Budget: $2.5 million from states & USEPA  Staff – 23

(4)

 981 Miles from Pittsburgh to Cairo

 Drinking water source for 5 million people (33 intakes)  120+ species of fish; rich in

mussels

 230 million tons of cargo transported annually; 20 locks and dams

 Recreational water resource

 38 power generating plants

(5)

 Regulatory – establish Ohio River Pollution Control Standards

 Monitoring (lots of it) & assessment  Spill Detection/Response (monitoring,

communications)

 Clean Water Act/Safe Drinking Water Act

implementation coordination (TMDLs, NPDES, etc…)

 Applied research (pharmaceuticals, mercury)  Public Involvement programs (volunteer

(6)

 Referred to as 305(b) report

 ORSANCO completes for Ohio River.

 Recommendation for states’ 303(d) Lists of

waters requiring TMDLs.

 Based on ORSANCO monitoring data.  2012 Impairments

◦ All 981 miles impaired for PCBs and dioxin based on

historical high volume water quality data.

◦ 630 miles impaired for contact recreational use based on

exceedances of E. coli &/or fecal coliform criteria.

◦ Recent previous assessments have temperature and

(7)

 Commission initiated study to characterize total

dissolved solids (TDS) and its primary

constituents in the Ohio River and selected tributaries.

 Weekly sampling conducted at 11 Ohio River

sites and on 5 tributaries for a suite of parameters.

 Sampling effort ran for 1 year (Dec 2011 – Dec

2012).

 Data assessment is ongoing.

(8)
(9)

Dissolved Solids Analytes 1. Sodium 2. Potassium 3. Magnesium 4. Calcium 5. Lithium 10. Bicarbonate

11. Total Dissolved Solids

Supplemental Parameters  pH  Conductivity  Temperature  Stream flow  Coordinate THM

sampling when possible

6. Chloride

7. Sulfate

8. Bromide

(10)

TDS Standard 500 mg/L  Highest levels observed during low-flow period in Aug/Sept.

 Levels on the Ohio

River did not

approach the 500 mg/L standard (max observed 368 mg/L)  TDS was higher on tributaries,

particularly the Big Sandy and

(11)

 Mission (per Compact) has been

focused on water quality

 Growing importance of integrating

quality and quantity management

 Droughts and shortages…not just a

“west of the Mississippi” issue anymore

 2009 Strategic Planning Workshop

◦ Outcome: ORSANCO should become more

“holistic” in its services to the states

(12)

 Committee Role:

◦ To study, discuss and evaluate water resources issues of concern or interest to the Commission and basin states

◦ Provides a forum for states and federal agencies to discuss water resources issues (meets 3 times annually)

◦ Current membership includes:

◦ Committee must be financially self-supporting

States

Indiana Kentucky New York Ohio

Pennsylvania Tennessee Virginia West Virginia

Federal

Tennessee Valley Authority US Army Corps of Engineers US Geological Survey

(13)

 Effort funded by private foundation grants  Initial focus to complete three water resource

characterization studies

1. Water resources inventory and characterization

 Characterize current water resources issues (i.e. water use,

inter-basin transfers, climate change, E-flows)

2. Examination of laws and regulations

 Comparison of existing state and federal rules/regs governing water resources

3. Evaluation of Commission role in water resources management

 Define appropriate role for Commission and develop funding mechanism for future WR activities

 Timeline

◦ Reports #1 and #2 to be completed 2013 ◦ Report #3 to be completed 2014

(14)

 Methyl Mercury fish tissue data was collected

in hybrid striped bass samples.

 40% of samples exceeded ORSANCO’s MeHg

fish tissue criterion of 0.3 mg/kg.

 Hybrid striped bass considered “worst case”

scenario.

 ORSANCO’s Technical Committee decided

river would remain “unassessed” until fish tissue data from other commonly consumed species was collected and evaluated.

 Some states have listed Ohio River for

mercury impairments. OEPA does not include Ohio River in any listings.

(15)

 ORSANCO prohibition on mixing zones for

bioaccumulative chemicals of concern (mercury).

 Effectively will require discharges to meet

0.012 ug/L for total mercury at end of pipe.

 PPG requested and received a variance from

this prohibition.

 Ironton has requested a variance from

ORSANCO – has already received variance from OEPA.

 ORSANCO is developing formal variance

(16)

Objective:

•Project at Hannibal L&D in

area of mercury discharge variance request by PPG Inc. Natrium, WV mile 120

•A single site-specific

bioaccumulation factor for methyl Hg

•Calculated from direct

measurement of methyl mercury in water and

(17)

 12 Equal Discharge Increment (EDI)

composite water samples (1 year/Monthly)

◦ Analysis for total and methyl mercury, filtered and

unfiltered

◦ Known methylation factors: DOC, D SO4,

Chlorophyll-a

 12 composite fish tissue analyses:

◦ 4 TL4 composites

◦ 4 TL3 composites

◦ 4 TL2 composites

(18)

Objectives:

 Create inventory of FGD systems and ash ponds

on the Ohio River (FGD type, installation date, discharge location).

 Characterize total and methyl mercury discharges

from FGD systems.

 Data will be used in conjunction with mercury

trend analyses to investigate potential impacts from these discharges.

(19)

 Four sample events (quarterly) at four coal-fired power generation facilities  Three sample locations per facility:

◦ Upstream baseline or raw inflow

◦ FGD wastewater post treatment

◦ Fly/bottom ash pond final discharge

 Analytical parameters to be monitored:

•Filtered total Hg •Unfiltered total Hg •Filtered methyl Hg •Unfiltered methyl Hg •Selenium •Bromide

•Dissolved Organic Carbon •Dissolved Sulfate

•Total Dissolved Solids

(20)

 2012 revisions of bacteria criteria for protection

of recreational use.

◦ Fecal coliform criteria removed.

◦ Numeric E. coli criteria revised as follows:

◦ 130 cfu/100mL as 90-day geometric mean.

 Previously 30-day.

◦ 240 cfu/100mL in more than 25% of samples.

 Previously single sample max.

 Max. Temperature criterion of 110 deg F added

for protection of human health from body contact exposure.

(21)

 USEPA Region 5 is completing a bacteria TMDL for

the entire Ohio River.

 About 2/3 of the river is listed as impaired.  ORSANCO has been involved:

◦ Monitoring to generate data to support the modeling effort.

◦ Provide technical expertise on the Ohio River.

◦ Collection of other necessary data.

 Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS model being

utilized.

 There will be a continued public involvement

process (one set of meetings held in 2009).

(22)

 Fish Community 1957-present

 Macroinvertebrate Community 1964-present  Fish Tissue Contaminants 1970-present

 Supplemental Data Collections

◦ Mussel Community 2012

◦ Periphyton Community 2007-2012

◦ Water & Sediment Chemistry 2007-present

(23)

 Lockchamber Rotenone 1957-2005

◦ Long term trends analysis

 Night-time Boat Electrofishing 1990-present

◦ Aquatic Life Use Assessments [305(b)]

 Uses Modified Ohio River Fish Index (mORFIn)

◦ Probabilistic Pool Surveys (15 sites/pool)

◦ 18 Riverwide Fixed Stations (sampled annually since 2004)

 Benthic Trawling 2006-2008

(24)

 Collected at electrofishing sites  Methods

◦ Rockbaskets 1964-1971

◦ Hester-Dendy (HD) 1968-present

 Shallow (2-3’ of water) & Deep (10’)

◦ D-Frame Net Kicks (Kicks) 2004-present

 Recently developed multi-metric index ◦ Uses combination of Deep HD & Kicks

 Draft numeric index has been developed and will

be evaluated over the next couple years.

 Initial results seem to compare reasonably with

fish surveys.

(25)

 Objectives:

◦ Monitor contaminants levels & track trends

◦ Provide information to states to support fish

consumption advisories (www.orsanco.org/fca)

◦ Provide information for 305(b) assessment of Fish

Consumption Use

 Analytes

◦ PCBs

◦ Mercury (total & methyl) & other metals

◦ DDTs, Chlordanes, and other pesticides

◦ PBDEs, PFCs, Dioxins, etc on occasion

 Fish tissue contaminants of concern include

(26)

 Mussel Community 2012

◦ Initial explorations for use as bio-indicators

 Periphyton Community 2007-2012

◦ Draft diatom multi-metric index recently completed

 Water & Sediment Chemistry 2007-present

◦ Used to create condition gradients for biotic data

(27)

 2200 Gallon Mobile Aquarium

 Set-up at various events along river

◦ Approximately 10-12 events April-October

 Filled at event with

water & fish

(28)

 In May 1977, the Commission voted to expand it’s

monitoring capabilities to include volatile organics (VOC’s), in response to an ongoing Carbon Tetrachloride release into

Kanawha River that February.

◦ 6 downstream water utilities were unprotected and vulnerable with no ability to detect volatile organics routinely; water quality was

compromised and communities were served contaminated water for over a week.

 ODS is designed to be a Spills Detection Network.

 Samples collected from Ohio River at 14 drinking water

utilities (one on Kanawha River).

 At least 1 source water sample is analyzed per day from each

site.

◦ In 2012, nearly 4,200 VOC samples were collected from ODS locations and analyzed.

 Less than 2% of the time, reportable detections found–(that’s a good thing!)

◦ Most common detections are Chloroform, (THM’s), Benzene, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, and TCE.

(29)

 Continued partnerships with water utilities, the Water Users Advisory Committee (WUAC), and

industry has kept ODS operational for 34 years.

◦ In kind services provided by ODS host sites over the past two years totals over $1.4M.

 Operational and maintenance costs are estimated to be over $200,000 annually when renovation is completed.

(30)

 Methylene Chloride 1,3 Dichlorobenzene  1,1 Dichloroethylene 1,4 Dichlorobenzene  1,1 Dichloroethane 1,2 Dichlorobenzene

 Chloroform 1,1,1 Trichloroethane

 Acrylonitrile Carbon Tetrachloride

 1,2 Dichloroethane Benzene

 trans-1,2 Dichloroethylene Trichloroethylene

 cis-1,3 Dichloropropene 1,2 Dichloropropane

 trans-1,3 Dichloropopene Dichlorobromomethane

 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene Toluene

 1,1, 2,2 Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene

 1,1,2 Trichloroethane Dibromochloromethane  Trichlorofluoromethane Ethylbenzene

 Napthalene Chlorobenzene

 Styrene (co-elutes with o,p xylenes)  Bromoform

(31)

Water Utility

Early 90’s technology CMS5000 process GC GC/MS technology

(32)

 In 2008-2010 ORSANCO was able to obtain

$4.4 Mil in funding to support a network wide renovation and upgrade. The Renovation will allow the ODS to:

◦ Use automated sample injection to increase

frequency of analysis to 4-6 times daily

◦ Reduce analysis time

◦ Increase number of VOC’s that can be identified

◦ Increase number of monitoring sites

(33)

 Project began with Electric

Power Research Institute 2008 feasibility study.

◦ Power plants compliance cost ranged from $20-180 per lb of nitrogen

◦ Typical farmer BMP cost $2-4 per lb

 Project funding to date

from project partners and grants: $5 Million

 Advisory groups from

Power Industry, Agriculture, WWTP’s, Environmental

Groups.

◦ WWTP advisory group from NACWA

 Project Partners

Electric Power Research Institute

American Electric Power

Duke Energy

Hoosier Energy

Tennessee Valley Authority

American Farmland Trust

Ohio Farm Bureau Federation

ORSANCO

Hunton & Williams

Kieser & Associates

US EPA

(34)

 An option for compliance with permit limits.  A permitted source of nutrients with a high

compliance cost pays a non-point source

with a lower reduction cost to install nutrient best management practices.

(35)

Full Scale Program 38 Power plants 230,000 Farmers Thousands of WWTP

(36)

 Pilot phase will test out procedures developed

for the program

 Pilot Trading Plan signed by Ohio EPA,

Indiana DEP, Kentucky DEP August 9, 2012

 $100,000 will be spent on BMP’s in each

State.

◦ Projects are currently being scoped

◦ Installation of BMP’s this spring/summer

◦ First credits for sale in September 2013

(37)

 Problem:

◦ Nutrients are one of the most common causes of

impairments to water in the U.S.

◦ USEPA has directed all States to develop numeric

nutrient criteria

 Objective:

◦ Collect a long term dataset for development of numeric

nutrient criteria.

◦ Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)

 Some algae cause taste and odor problems with drinking

water. These issues have become more common on the Ohio River.

 Some algae can produce toxins which are harmful to humans

(38)

 Parameters: total phosphorus, nitrate/nitrite, TKN, ammonia, phytoplankton algae identification, chlorophyll a.  Frequency: 2/month. 12 months/year for nutrients. 9

months/year for algae.

 7locations

 West View, PA ORM5  Wheeling , WV ORM87  Huntington, WV ORM306  Northern KY ORM463  Louisville, KY ORM600  Evansville, IN ORM792  Paducah, KY ORM936

(39)
(40)

 EPA has mandated that states develop numeric

nutrients criteria.

 Criteria development for the main stem of the Ohio

River began in 2002.

 Development of numeric criteria have proved to be a

difficult task.

 There are not obvious cause-effect relationships

between concentrations of nutrients and impairments caused by nutrients.

 There are occasional algae blooms and drinking water

taste & odor problems that are associated with nutrients.

 Continuing to look at other indicators such as

changes in macroinvertebrate communities resulting from nutrients.

 Unknown as to when numeric criteria may be

(41)

References

Related documents

Exercise represents a useful non-pharmacological strategy for the treatment in type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients, but high intensity exercise can induce a transient inflammatory state

These paclitaxel resistant ovarian cells demonstrate: (1) Increased IC50 for paclitaxel and docetaxel (10 to 75-fold) and cross-resistance to anthracyclines (2) Reduced cell

While a few clinical studies have shown that antibiotics during PD-1 inhibition are associated with inferior survival, an- other study presented at the Society for Immunotherapy

Similarly, clear increase ( P < 0.001) in cystic and atretic follicles while a decrease in corpus luteum was perceived in PCOS positive group that was upturned by treatment

Given the potential clinical utility of BDX008 for optimization of advanced melanoma treatment, we sought to further validate the test in an independent cohort of pa- tients with

Data collected during Marine Special Operations Command.. 40) Data presented as mean (95% Confidence Interval of the mean) a Data collected during US Army Special Forces Small

In this study, pioglitazone treatment of PCO model rats reduced the total number and rate of atretic follicles, and also reduced their serum AMH and elevated adipo- nectin