• No results found

Synergies Between AML & Fraud Departments/Programs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Synergies Between AML & Fraud Departments/Programs"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Consulting Services for Management & Banking

Synergies Between

AML & Fraud

Departments/Programs

Presented by: Ana Maria H. de Alba

April 5

th

, 2012

(2)

AML & Fraud

Policies & Programs

1.

Developing a Fraud Prevention Program makes it clear

that:

a)

Fraud by employees will not be tolerated and all

employees are responsible for its prevention

b)

Government & taxpayers take fraud very seriously

2.

Developing an AML Program makes it clear that:

a)

Money Laundering prevention is the responsibility of all

employees in an organization

b)

Government and the international community take

(3)

Definitions

What is fraud?

There are several types of fraud; one of its

principal definitions is:

concealment of material

facts

Fraud is generally divided into three major

categories, one of which is:

fraudulent

statements

What is Money Laundering?

The process by which the

origin or source of

funds

are

hidden or obscured

in order to make

that source appear legitimate

(4)

Both the AML and Fraud Prevention Programs

require, essentially, the same strategies:

Setting

Tone at the top

Implementation of

policies

Robust system of

internal controls

(include appropriate

technology, case management, and monitoring tools

;)

Ongoing

training

Periodic

testing or audits

of the effectiveness of the

implemented internal controls

Establishing a

Financial Integrity Unit and an AML

Compliance Unit

  Note: An AML/CFT Program also requires the designation of a senior manager responsible for executing and

supervising the Program (The Compliance Officer)

Similarities in

(5)

o

Generally, an organization will be alerted of the

occurrence of fraud or possible money laundering

via:

Similarities in Detecting

Fraud & Money Laundering

 

Alerts

produced by the

internal

control system

(i.e. monitoring,

internal reporting mechanisms, etc.)

 

Internal or External Audit

(i.e. noted

discrepancies, transaction testing,

etc.)

 

Notification

from

Supervising

authority or law enforcement

(6)

For an entity to have an adequate prevention program, it

must:

Develop, document, and implement a

Policy

(

approved by your

entity’s BOD)

Conduct a

risk assessment

to identify vulnerabilities in each of

the major categories

Fraud:

 

Fraudulent Statement, Corruption, and asset

misappropriation

AML:

 

Customers, Products & Services, Geographies

Apply control procedures on the basis of

materiality and risk

,

and conduct due diligence on existing relationships (customers,

employees, and vendors) at appropriate times.

The Fraud & AML

(7)

 

For both the Fraud and AML Prevention Programs, entities

must also apply:

 

Appropriate Oversight (i.e. audit committee, AML

committee, AML Compliance Officer, internal audit team,

independent consultants, etc.)

 

Internal audit control

 

Separation of duties or division of responsibility

 

Ongoing training

 

Reporting mechanism (including anonymous suspicious

activity reporting)

The Fraud & AML

(8)

The Fraud & AML

(9)

Leverage/capitalize from internal information

Liaise with each Unit

Participate in Committees (i.e. Compliance

Committee, Audit Committee)

Negotiate on technology tools (i.e. case

management tools, monitoring, etc.)

Coordinate efforts for detecting suspicious activity

(10)

Credit card customer from Mexican institution:

Entity receives call from Hotel at time of customer

check out from a Starwood Hotel (Sheraton Hotel) in

Dallas, Texas:

Customer did not have sufficient credit in card

Customer claimed to have “deposited” $10K for the trip

on his card

Checkout balance was $13K +

Customer claimed that with his “deposit” and his line of

credit he should have had sufficient to cover

Credit Card division was quickly evaluating if a line

increase or temporary overage was possible

KYC profile disclosed that customer was a teacher in

Mexico

Case

(11)

Tone at the Top

(12)

Ana María H. de Alba, is an independent risk management consultant. She is the founder and Principal of Consulting Services for Management and Banking (CSMB), established in Miami, Florida since 1997. She is also an associate at various internationally recognized business intelligence, investigations, and security firms, and is the FIBA AML Institute’s lead instructor .

Ana Maria has over 24 years experience and training in both the banking and consulting industries. As a banking executive, she worked in domestic and international financial institutions, including Sun Trust, Banco Atlántico, International Finance Bank and Banco Internacional de Costa Rica. As a consultant, she has spearheaded and participated in numerous risk management and investigation assignments and projects in the USA, Venezuela, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Uruguay, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Panamá, Honduras, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the Caribbean.

Her professional history and accomplishments include supervision and development of risk management and assessment projects, as well as numerous other projects in forensic investigations linked to money laundering and financial fraud. Additionally, she has been engaged in projects concerning currency exchange; strategic organizational planning; investment analysis; market analysis; development of banking products and services; development and implementation of policies and procedures for all units within a banking institution; training and development, including public speaking on AML subject matter; development of compliance programs; and “look-back” or forensic review projects.

Ana Maria de Alba has an undergraduate degree in Business Administration with a Major in Finance from the University of Miami, as well as an MBA with emphasis in Banking and Finance from Nova Southeastern University. Additionally, in AML subject matter, Ms. De Alba is certified by FATF in “Methodology for Mutual Evaluations” as an expert country evaluator and is certified in Anti Money Laundering by FIBA in association with FIU, with both the AMLCA and CPAML designations.

(13)

Thank You

Ana Maria H. de Alba

"

Principal

"

Email: amdealba@cs-mb.com

"

Tel: 305.865.5664

"

Mobile: 305.951.0421

"

For Additional Information, please visit us at:

!

www.cs-mb.com

!

References

Related documents

To test for the possible effects of training in compassion and altruism on responses to fairness violations we used variants of the dictator game (e.g., Kahneman et al., 1986;

Clinical studies showed that a variety of acupoint stimulations have been extensively used for lung cancer patients, including needle insertion, injection with herbal

The Circuit Court of Cook County Mortgage Foreclosure Mediation Program (“Program”) is a court-annexed program that encourages homeowners in foreclosure to come to court so they

In our sample, lead venture capitalists from abroad carry through significantly more in- vestment rounds on average than venture capitalists from Germany (for the broad and the

If a biocidal product contains the approved active substance propan-2-ol or propan-1-ol which are subject to derogation - specific labelling requirements referred to in the Health

Typical domains in which safety-critical systems occur are process control, (for example, nuclear power plants), transportation (for example, air traffic control, railway signalling,

We define sliding-window l-dynamic frameproof codes, which use this information to prevent framing in the sliding- window model, and provide an example of a construction of

the real discount factor, constant across two adjacent periods one can estimate for the case of perfect competition an investment model from equation (9), allowing for fixed