• No results found

Cst an Antenna Simulation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cst an Antenna Simulation"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Antenna Simulation

Application Note

CST STUDIO SUITE™

Kra, Jeb / v1.0 / 02. July 2012

Antenna Examples

Simulation Setup

Post Processing

Co/Cross Polarization

Phase Center

Ludwig 3

Antenna Array

(2)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Ready-to-simulate antennas are available here:

Antenna Examples

 CST MWS Examples ->

Transient Analysis Examples -> Antennas -> Overview

 CST MWS Examples -> Integral Solver Examples -> Antennas -> Overview

Online Help ->

(3)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Construct simple Antenna Examples

(4)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Category

Examples

Typical Applications

Solvers

Reflector

Parabolic dish

Corner reflector

Communication

Radar

Radio astronomy

Aperture

Rectangular horn

Circular horn

Ridged horn

Waveguide array

Radar

Reflector feed

Calibration standards

Measurement

Wire

(Slot)

Dipole

LPDA, Yagi-Uda

Helix

Printed antennas

Discone

Communication

GPS

EMC measurement

RFID

Almost anything else…

Patch

Rectangular patch

Circular patch

Patch arrays

Radar

Communication

GPS

Imaging

(5)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Define boundaries as

open (add space)

Define a farfield monitor at

the frequency of interest

Make sure that the

antenna radiates at the

farfield monitor frequency

(6)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Define a farfield monitor at several frequencies

(macro is available)

(7)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Definition of Farfield Probes

Farfield monitors record the

radiation in all directions for

one frequency.

Farfield probes record the

radiation in one direction for

all frequencies.

(8)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Farfield Definitions

2 2 2 2 1 ) (disabled E E ER EAbs 2 2 2 1 ) (enabled E E EAbs

Approximation:

Radiation efficiency:

Total efficiency:

Directivity:

power input accepted power radiated erad ) ( power stimulated power radiated etotal power radiated angle solid unit per radiated power D( , ) 4

Component definition:

(9)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Total Radiated Power (TRP)

Macros -> Results -> Farfield -> Show Total Radiated Power (TRP)

Choose linear

or logarithmic

TRP output (in

farfield plot).

Specify power

level in Watt

or dBm.

There are three possibilities to calculate the TRP value:

Results -> Combine Results

Template Based Postprocessing (TBP) -> Farfield and Antenna Properties

-> Farfield Result -> Evaluation Range: 3D -> Result value: TRP

(10)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Total Isotropic Sensitivity (TIS)

TIS handling is very similar to TRP.

Specify receiver

sensitivity

in Watt or dBm.

Specify linear or

logarithmic TIS

output.

Only one (TIS or TRP) can

be displayed at the time.

TIS can also be applied to

CST Design Studio full

system or multi-port

combined results (similar

to TRP).

TIS far-field monitors are created.

(11)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

SAR Results

2D or 3D plot including

information about the

position of the maximum.

Opens logfile containing all results.

Visualization of

max. SAR cube

Macros -> Results -> 2D 3D Results -> Plot

Averaging Volume for maximum SAR value

(12)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Diversity / MIMO Antennas

Multiple antennas (

antenna diversity

) may overcome problem of fading dips.

Antenna 1

Antenna 2

„best of“ (diversity gain)

Load farfield of

second antenna

Select from:

• Diversity Gain • Envelope Correlation Coefficient • Multiplexing Efficiency

For lossless antennas in isotropic environment

the correlation and diversity gain can also be

calculated from S-Parameters

TBP -> Farfield Result -> MIMO

Set XPR and power

distribution

(13)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

The co-polarized far field component has the same polarization as the

excitation (y-oriented in above case).

The cross-polarized far field component is orthogonal to the

co-polarized component and main lobe direction.

In order to use different polarizations for transmitting/receiving, an antenna design goal might

be to maximize the co-polarized and minimize the cross-polarized component.

(14)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Co- / Cross-Polarization

Polarization vector direction

(arbitrary user input possible).

If “Main lobe ... “ is not selected, the user

can enter arbitrary directions for:

polarization plane normal (z‘)

(= theta axis),

cross-polarized component (x‘)

(= phi axis).

1. Select the tab “Axes“.

2. Click “Main lobe alignment“.

3. Choose the “Ludwig 3“ coordinate

system.

(15)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Finding the best location to place the

horn inside a parabolic antenna.

The best position is to match the focal

point of the dish with the phase center

of the horn.

?

= x‘z‘ plane

= y‘z‘ plane

(16)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Circular Polarization

Left and right polarized field components are calculated from the

tangential components:

2 1 2 1

2

1

2

1

iE

E

E

iE

E

E

right left

There are two different ways to calculate the circular polarization:

Combine Results

(17)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Ludwig 3

Ludwig 3 vertical

Ludwig 3 horizontal

cos

sin

sin

cos

E

E

E

E

E

E

vertical horizontal

(18)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

The total farfield of an antenna array can be calculated

in four different ways:

Complete simulation of the array

Array Factor

Periodic Cells (TD-Solver , FD-Solver ) + Array Factor

Unit Cells (FD-Solver ) + Array Factor

Antenna Array

(19)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

The accuracy level in the TD-Solver should be -40 dB.

For larger frequency bands (e.g. 0-3 GHz) or poor radiation it is

recommended to use -60 dB so that the E- and H-fields on the

bounding box do not suffer from FFT/DFT truncation errors.

Tip 1: Choose sufficient accuracy.

(20)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

The ”open (add space)“ boundary condition ensures λ/8 space at

the center frequency.

For lower frequencies (bigger λ) increase the bounding box size or

adjust the center frequency.

Tip 2: Set appropriate boundary conditions.

(21)

CST – COMPUTER SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY | www.cst.com

Tip 3: Check the energy balance.

Far field values become inaccurate, if S-parameter balance ≈1 (no

power is radiated). In this case directivity and gain are calculated from

dividing ≈0/0, which is numerically critical.

A good measure for total radiated power is: (1 - balance).

Tips & Tricks for an Accurate Farfield

At 4.5 GHz the

far field may be

inaccurate.

References

Related documents