Data Analysis and Interpretation

Full text

(1)c c To understand and study the theoretical prescription in HRM practices

(2) ! . "# $ #!% &# ' ' % & . (# % & PART 1 )Ê c*+ % & ÷Ê c )Ê % ,% & ÷Ê ' ! % & )Ê %*& * +& -&#' ! )Ê .% %*& * +& -&/ ÷Ê ) ! % & )Ê * ,%*& * +& -& ÷Ê ' % & )Ê % & )Ê % & +0 )Ê , + ,% & )Ê

(3) 1+0 ,% & )Ê c,, +

(4) .% & c & -& )Ê +% - c % & -& , %*& * + - 2 .

(5) PART 2 )Ê %*& * + -3% 4 ÷Ê & ' ÷Ê % ÷Ê % 5 '' ÷Ê , % ÷Ê ' % '' ÷Ê % ' )Ê 1

(6) 5c- ÷Ê & '5 ÷Ê 6$ ÷Ê 1$ % ! ÷Ê 1$ ÷Ê 1$ )Ê + *& ÷Ê & '5 ÷Ê ÷Ê & '7 6$ ÷Ê c! ' )Ê + 8 ' 56$ ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê ! )Ê c +& ÷Ê ÷Ê *' ÷Ê )Ê - cc0 && ÷Ê '9 ÷Ê ' ÷Ê ' ÷Ê &' ! 5' ÷Ê &' ! .

(7) )Ê. )Ê. )Ê )Ê. )Ê. . - c& -& , & + ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê '' 1

(8) 0 * ÷Ê

(9) 1+0 ,1

(10) 0 * ÷Ê &% c ,1

(11) 0 * + & ÷Ê & + - cc0 & ÷Ê + ! ÷Ê ! ' & ---

(12) %*& * +& -& ÷Ê &'' % ! ÷Ê

(13) % & .

(14) To understand the new recruitment & selection practices and concepts followed in the IT organizations TABLE-1 Sources of Recruitment Sources <

(15) . Actual " = ( ":. Percentage ":; =:; (:; "::; . . . .

(16)

(17)

(18). .

(19) .

(20) . . +% )" ! '> ? ' =:; < (:; $ < ? ":; 8< 7 ' '> '> $ ? ? < 7 .

(21) TABLE-2 Method of Recruitment Method ! . + + ' < ! ) ' . Actual ": ": A ( C B A " : @(. percentage (@; (@; 7% B; "D; "(; =; (; :; "::;. .

(22)

(23)

(24). . +% )(.

(25) (@; '> ! . "D; ?? $ !' 7 + ? < ! ) ' ' 8 & '> ' ! $ '! '> '' ! $ 7 $ ! Table 3 Effectiveness of Recruitment Sources Sources . Avg ± no. of respondents AD. ! (D < ! (A. (@ + "A (( + ' A( # ' "A "DB. Avg - percent (:; "B; "(; "(; =; ""; "E; =;.

(26)

(27) !

(28). . "

(29)

(30). . +% A. (:; ! . "B; ! $ ! + ' ? < ! ? "E;?"(;"(; ! ! < "";55 ) ' ! < =; . Inference: ' ! $ ? $ ! $ ' ! + ' $ ' '! '> ' $ ! TABLE-4 Use of Internet/ Intranet for Recruitment Selection Reasons. Agree. Strongly. Disagree. Strongly. Undecided.

(31) ! $ , . A. Agree =. :. disagree :. :. B D. B ". : :. : :. : :. E. @. :. :. :. (A. "=. :. :. :. CHART 4 . #

(32) !

(33) ! . $

(34) %&

(35) !

(36) %'(

(37)

(38) !%!

(39) . )

(40)

(41)

(42) !%!

(43) * .

(44) 9 @"; ' ' + '>. (D;(@; ' ' ! -! AD;? (E;? ((; ' $ ? -! ! $ 9 8 * 9 ! '> & '> !' ?. ?& .

(45) ! ! F ! $ ! TABLE ± 5 USE Six Sigma in Recruiting . +* E @ ":. + - E: @: . CHART 5   . . 0

(46) . .. . +*,-. #+.*/. E:;: <' $ 7 ' . @:; <' $ ' TABLE ± 6 Future plans to implement Six Sigma in Recruiting. CHART 6. +* @ :. + - ":: :.

(47) . . .   . . . . . . +*,-. #+.*/ . . . . 0

(48) . .. 0

(49) . .. Inference: '> 7 ? $ ! ' % ! ! "::; ! ' < ' ' ! ! ' ! '> > '<' ' TABLE-6 Use of Behavioral Interview in Selection Response Total. Actual = A ":. Percentage =:; A:; .

(50)    0

(51) . .. .

(52)

(53)

(54). +% )E . ! ' ' 6 ' !

(55) ! $ ! =:; A:; 8 ? ! ' ! ! ' 6 ' '> ' $ ' '>? ' ! $ F$ ! $ $ ! 6$

(56) !$ ! TABLE ± 7 Response to behavioral interview used to predict future On-thejob behavior '' ' * . : A :. ' :; A:; :;.

(57) ' '' . @ A ":. @:; A:; . . . .

(58)

(59)

(60). $ ' !%

(61)

(62). $&

(63) 1 !%

(64)

(65). , !

(66) %!

(67) !. $&

(68) 1 $ '

(69)

(70)

(71)

(72). Chart 7. E:; ' $ ! ! ) )6$$ ! . A:;A:; : ' ' ' ' $ ! ! 1$ ! , +8 , $! ?'> '

(73) ! ! F # )6$$ ! '> ! ' ' $ F ! ' TABLE ± 8 provision of company handbook Response Total +% C. Actual ": : ":. Percentage "::; :; .

(74)

(75) .

(76) . . . .   . . . . .

(77)

(78)

(79). . . . . . 0

(80) . .. 0

(81) . .. '>! ' $ ()@? ! ! ? ? ? $ ? ! ' $ $ ! , +8 '> ! ' G F ! ) < ' '> 7 < ? $ ' ' ) ! ' < $!' 6$ ! ?$' ) ?'$ TABLE ± 9 Use of technology for reference checks Response Total . Actual B B ":. Percentage B:; B:; "::;.

(82) +% D.

(83) .

(84) . . . . . . . . .

(85)

(86)

(87). . . . . . 0

(88) . .. 0

(89) . .. B:; '' ? B:; ' , +8 . $ ! '? '> $ ' + ' $ '> ' ' ' TABLE ± 10 use of Human Resource Information System in HR functions % ,. '

(90) + '5 ' + '. ' '>9. = D. ' ""; "@;. C E. "(; D;. E @ B. D; E; C;.

(91) ' 5 % '5 ! c! ' . E A E ". D; B; D; (;. ( A EE. A; B; . . +% ": ! ' ! $ '> !' <. ? .

(92) $ ? ! ! ? ' ' < 7 F % "A; % , % '?

(93) ? ? ""; E; % , +8 '? ?' % &! ' % & '>F % 3% 4? ! 'H ! $ ' !' $ ' ? '% ? ''? '? !'% To analyze the training and development, career management activities in the organizations Table ± 11 training and development considered from strategic viewpoint Total CHART ± 11. Actual ": : ":. Percentage "::; :; .

(94)

(95) .

(96) . . . .   . . . . .

(97)

(98)

(99). . . . . . 0

(100) . .. 0

(101) . .. "::; ' ' ! ! $ ! ' ! . ' 5 '>? $ ' $? <$ ' '>H ! 5c ' ! , +8 ' 5 c ! ' ' ' ' ! ? ' ' $ 6$ ' < ! $? ! ! '>% ?'> ''5c' '! TABLE ± 12 percentage of revenue spent on T & D, Education & Research B; B;)":; ":;)"B; "B;)(:; (:;5$! . A ( A ( :. ' A:; (:; A:; (:; :;.

(102) . ":. "::; . . .

(103)

(104)

(105). -

(106) " . " . " . 2(

(107). +% "( A:; ":#"B; ! ? A:; B; 5c? B # ": ; ! $ (:; (:; "B # (:; 5c? ! % 5c? 5 $'' '> ! ! , +8 & '> ! ? ' ' '? ! '> ' $ ' '> Table ± 13 Frequency of different training programs.

(108) . & I 9 ( (:; E E:; B B:; ' ' < ! @ @:; ! . ' ( (:; E E:; &' B:; A A:; 9 ! + " ":; + B B:; @ @:; ( (:; ! 9 " ":; A A:; ' . . .    3 . . . C C:;. ( (:; E. E:;. ! . ( (:;. B B:; " ":; A A:; ": "::; . " ":; C . . C:;. ( (:;. ": "::; . . @ @:; ": "::; . . . %!

(109) !

(110)

(111) !

(112) ! ' 4

(113) ' 5 ' 6

(114)

(115) 7'. +"A '' '> ' ' , $! ? $ C:; ! 9 ' ' .

(116) ?B:; 7 ?A:; $(:; $ < ! ! ! E:; ! ?@:; 7 $?(:; $ (:; F ! ' ''$E:; 7 ?(:; ? B:; ":; ! ' + ' ' 9 ! "::; ! ? B:; ? A:; 7 A:;+ ! C:; $ ?":; ?":;7 (:; ! '+ ! ''! $ ?B:; $?@:; (:; 7 $ ? ? ' "::; ! $? @:; ? A:; 7 ":; , +8 ' ! ! ! $ ! '> F $ ' ' ' ' ! '> ! 7 ' ' ' ' ' ' ! TABLE ± 14 Methods used to upgrade the competencies of employees # ' +'9 ' + ) )6$ . = C C A B A". ' (A; (E; (E; ":; "E; .

(117) .

(118)

(119)

(120).

(121) % +% 8 + & 9 "

(122) ":( &

(123) % . 9

(124) . +% "@ ' ! ' < ! '> ' (E; ' 9 ' ' (E; # ' ' ' < ? (A; '# ' , +8 + ' ? ? ! $ ! $ !$ $ ! $ ' 6$% '>' '' $ '> ! Table 15 importance of E ± learning . ' ' . ' . * . ' E. ' ' @.

(125) # ' $ $ '> ) '$! E:; ' # '$ @:; ' ' # ' ! , +8 # ' ' ! ? '> ' ! ' ' # ' ' ' $ $! ! 9 ' # ' ' ' ?! < Table ± 16 Emphasis of behavioral training . %' > . . > . $'. @. (=; A. . (:;. > A @A;. > : :;.

(126) ( + B + @ ! '. "A; B. AA;. ". "@; (. E=;. AA; A. (:;. ". "@; ". AA;. (=; @. (=;. (. (D; :. :;. Chart 16 *

(127) &(%!% . %

(128)

(129) 7% +&& % % 7%. . +

(130)

(131) % %% ' % % ;%' & %<

(132) ! . & .

(133) & %<

(134) !

(135) & %<

(136) !

(137) & %<

(138) !. + ' ' $ ! ' $ ' '>AA; ' > ' ? (=; $' (=; ! ' AA; >' (=; !' , +8

(139) ! ' $'? ? $ '> ? ! ! ' .

(140) + '> '' '$ ! TABLE ± 17 benchmarking of training methods . +* E @ ":. + - E: @: . +% "=. . . . . . . . . . . . +*,-. . . . . . . 0

(141) . .. #+.*/. 0

(142) . .. E:; $ ' '>? @:; $ ' , +8

(143) ' ' '> ! > .

(144) TABLE ± 18 different career initiatives taken up . & ' + ) ' -) ' '>' ' . E = ": @ E. ' "B; "C; (E; ":; "B;. E AE. "B; "::;. . . .

(145)

(146)

(147). +"C. + ) ' ' ! ! % ?'> ' ' ! ' (E; ' "C; '"B; ? "B; '> ' ":; ! ' ') '.

(148) , +8 ' <$ ) ' 9 ' ' % ? ! ! &' $ ) '> & '> ! ! ' ?6$ ' TABLE ± 19 Practices of rewarding or providing incentives for employee suggestion Response Total . Actual ": : ":. Percentage "::; :; CHART 19.

(149) .

(150) . . . 3 .

(151)

(152)

(153). +&& =%

(154)

(155) % % . "::; ! ! !$ '' '! ! !.

(156) , +8 '> ! > % ! ! !' '> ' $' ! !! '> ! ! '! $' !! ? ! '! $' ! Table ± 20 Objectives which drives pay and reward changes !

(157) , + ! !' ' ! . C E D E E AB. ' (A; "=; (E; "=; "=; . . .

(158)

(159)

(160). CHART 20. (EB ' $ '$6 ! ' (A; .

(161) ' ! !. "=; ! "=; $' ! !' ' , +8 $ ' ! ! ! '> To find out the new roles of the HR department in managing performance and study the new employment practices followed in the organizations Table ± 21 type of appraisal form across different levels + c . : ": A "A. ' :; ==; (A; .

(162) .

(163) . . 3 .

(164)

(165)

(166). +&& =%

(167)

(168) 9

(169) % % . CHART 21 .

(170) ! ! $ $ ==; ! . (A; ! , +8. ' ' ! ' ' 6$

(171) ! !$ ' $ ! ! ! $ % ? '> ! TABLE ± 22 right match of competencies which gives best performance &! . ! ! . B C E "D. ' (E; @(; A(; . . .

(172)

(173)

(174). 5 % %. 6 7

(175) % &

(176).

(177) %

(178). .

(179) CHART 22. ' !$ '! $ @(; $ ! F ! ! $' ' A(; F ! (E; F$ ! , +8 '? ? ! $!$ !$ $ !$ ' 6$ $ 'B $ TABLE ± 23 Use of competency mapping in performance management CHART 23. +* @ E ":. + - @:; E:; "::;.

(180) . . . . . . . . . . . +*,-. . . . . . . 0

(181) . .. #+.*/. 0

(182) . .. @:; ' ' . E:; > ' , +8 + '!! < ! 6$ $ '> ''? ' ' ' ' ! ' ' '> $ ' $ $

(183) #(@* +&& . +* ( C ":. + - (:; C:; "::;.

(184) . . 3. 3 . . . . . . . . . . +*,-. . . . . . . . 0

(185) . #+.*/ . . .. 0

(186) . .. +% (@ C:; ! +&& '>? (:; ! +&&? '$ Table 25 Level of PCMM achieved ! " ! ( ! A ! @ ! B +(B. ( (. ' : : : : (:; . (:; ! ! ! B C:; ' +&& TABLE 26 Plans of implementing PCMM . +* C. + - C:.

(187) . : C. : . . . .   . . . . . . +*,-. . . . . 0

(188) . .. #+.*/. 0

(189) . .. +% (E C:; ?! +&&? ' +&& '> , +8. +&& !'' '> ! ! ' ! $ '> ? ! ? ! ? '> ! ! $. +&& ' % cI& +&& $ $ '>? >' ' '> ! +&& ' '>? ! ! $ TABLE ± 27 Uses of competency mapping / PCMM model creates a difference in performance '' ' . . ' :; :;.

(190) * ' '' . @ E ":. :; @:; E:; .    3 .

(191)

(192)

(193). $ ' !%

(194)

(195). $&

(196) 1 !%

(197)

(198). , !

(199) %!

(200) !. $&

(201) 1 $ '

(202)

(203)

(204)

(205). Chart 27 E:; ' ' ' 9. +&& ! ? @:; ' ! , +8 ' 9 +&& ! $ '> ! '>? % ! ! !' ? $ F ' '> $ % ? ' 7 9 ? ! > '! ' TABLE 28 Process Mapping in HR functions . +* @ E ":. + - @: E: .

(206) . . . . . . . . . . . +*,-. . . . . . 0

(207) . #+.*/ . . .. 0

(208) . .. CHART 28. @:; ! ' % ? E:; ! '

(209) #(E" '% , . .

(210) .

(211)

No results found