• No results found

Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint"

Copied!
32
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint

Math 8

Department of Mathematics Dartmouth College

(2)

Maximizing wih a constraint

We wish to solve the following problem:

Find the maximum volume of a rectangular box that has a surface area of 70cm2.

(3)

Maximizing wih a constraint

We wish to solve the following problem:

Find the maximum volume of a rectangular box that has a surface area of 70cm2.

We begin by translating this into a set of equations:

V = lwh

SA = 2lw + 2wh + 2lh

(4)

Maximizing wih a constraint

We wish to solve the following problem:

Find the maximum volume of a rectangular box that has a surface area of 70cm2.

We begin by translating this into a set of equations:

V = lwh

SA = 2lw + 2wh + 2lh

Solving the surface area equation for h yields

h = 35 − lw l + w

(5)

Defining V in terms of l and w

So far, we have

h = 35 − lw l + w

Plugging this into the volume equation yields

V = lw 35 − lw l + w  = 35lw − l 2w2 l + w

(6)

Defining V in terms of l and w

So far, we have

h = 35 − lw l + w

Plugging this into the volume equation yields

V = lw 35 − lw l + w  = 35lw − l 2w2 l + w

We will now maximize this function for positive values of l and w - negative values do not make sense physically.

(7)

Defining V in terms of l and w

So far, we have

h = 35 − lw l + w

Plugging this into the volume equation yields

V = lw 35 − lw l + w  = 35lw − l 2w2 l + w

We will now maximize this function for positive values of l and w - negative values do not make sense physically.

To do this, we follow our maximization/minimization procedure. 1. Find the critical points of V with l ≥ 0 and w ≥ 0

2. Test critical points and boundary points to find maximum

(8)

Calculating V

l

First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l:

∂ ∂lV = ∂ ∂l 35lw − l2w2 l + w

(9)

Calculating V

l

First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l:

∂ ∂lV = ∂ ∂l 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35w − 2lw 2)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35lw − 2l2w2 + 35w2 2lw3 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2

(10)

Calculating V

l

First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l:

∂ ∂lV = ∂ ∂l 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35w − 2lw 2)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35lw − 2l2w2 + 35w2 2lw3 35lw +l2w2 (l + w)2

(11)

Calculating V

l

First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l:

∂ ∂lV = ∂ ∂l 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35w − 2lw 2)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35lw − 2l2w2 + 35w2 2lw3 35lw +l2w2 (l + w)2 = −l 2w2 + 35w2 2lw3 (l + w)2

(12)

Calculating V

l

First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l:

∂ ∂lV = ∂ ∂l 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35w − 2lw 2)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35lw − 2l2w2 + 35w2 2lw3 35lw +l2w2 (l + w)2 = −l 2w2 + 35w2 2lw3 (l + w)2 = w 2 (l + w)2(35 − 2lw − l 2 )

(13)

Calculating V

w

Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w:

∂ ∂wV = ∂ ∂w 35lw − l2w2 l + w

(14)

Calculating V

w

Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w:

∂ ∂wV = ∂ ∂w 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35l − 2l 2w)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35l2 2l3w + 35lw − 2l2w2 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2

(15)

Calculating V

w

Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w:

∂ ∂wV = ∂ ∂w 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35l − 2l 2w)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35l2 2l3w + 35lw 2l2w2 35lw +l2w2 (l + w)2

(16)

Calculating V

w

Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w:

∂ ∂wV = ∂ ∂w 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35l − 2l 2w)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35l2 2l3w + 35lw 2l2w2 35lw +l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35l 2 l2w2 2l3w (l + w)2

(17)

Calculating V

w

Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w:

∂ ∂wV = ∂ ∂w 35lw − l2w2 l + w = (35l − 2l 2w)(l + w) − 35lw + l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35l2 2l3w + 35lw 2l2w2 35lw +l2w2 (l + w)2 = 35l 2 l2w2 2l3w (l + w)2 = l 2 (l + w)2(35 − 2lw − w 2 )

(18)

Find critical points

From the previous computations, we have

∇V (l, w) =  w2 (l + w)2 (35 − 2lw − l 2 ), l 2 (l + w)2(35 − 2lw − w 2 ) 

(19)

Find critical points

From the previous computations, we have

∇V (l, w) =  w2 (l + w)2 (35 − 2lw − l 2 ), l 2 (l + w)2(35 − 2lw − w 2 ) 

Assuming, for physical reasons, that l and w are nonzero, we need to solve the system

35 − 2lw − l2 = 0 35 − 2lw − w2 = 0

(20)

Find critical points

From the previous computations, we have

∇V (l, w) =  w2 (l + w)2 (35 − 2lw − l 2 ), l 2 (l + w)2(35 − 2lw − w 2 ) 

Assuming, for physical reasons, that l and w are nonzero, we need to solve the system

35 − 2lw − l2 = 0 35 − 2lw − w2 = 0

Subtracting the second equation from the first yields:

(35 − 2lw − l2) − (35 − 2lw − w2) = 0

−l2 + w2 = 0 w = ±l

(21)

Find critical points

From the previous computations, we have

∇V (l, w) =  w2 (l + w)2 (35 − 2lw − l 2 ), l 2 (l + w)2(35 − 2lw − w 2 ) 

Assuming, for physical reasons, that l and w are nonzero, we need to solve the system

35 − 2lw − l2 = 0 35 − 2lw − w2 = 0

Subtracting the second equation from the first yields:

(35 − 2lw − l2) − (35 − 2lw − w2) = 0

−l2 + w2 = 0 w = ±l

Again, to be physically reasonable, both l and w are positive so, l = w

(22)

Solving for critical points

So far, we have that l = w.

Plugging this into the first equation 35 − 2lw − l2 = 0, we get

35 − 2l2 −l2 = 0

(23)

Solving for critical points

So far, we have that l = w.

Plugging this into the first equation 35 − 2lw − l2 = 0, we get

35 − 2l2 −l2 = 0

Or,

l2 = 35 3

(24)

Solving for critical points

So far, we have that l = w.

Plugging this into the first equation 35 − 2lw − l2 = 0, we get

35 − 2l2 −l2 = 0

Or,

l2 = 35 3

Or, again noting the l must be positive:

l =  35 3

12

(25)

Solving for critical points

So far, we have that l = w.

Plugging this into the first equation 35 − 2lw − l2 = 0, we get

35 − 2l2 −l2 = 0

Or,

l2 = 35 3

Or, again noting the l must be positive:

l =  35 3

12

Putting this together with the fact that w = l and h = 35−lwl+w , we have that the only critical point in our domain is

   35 3 12 , 35 3 12 , 35 − 35 3  2 353 12   =  35 3 12 , 35 3 12 , 35 3 12!

(26)

Finding the absolute maximum

The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w ≥ 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions.

(27)

Finding the absolute maximum

The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w ≥ 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions.

Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is

V =  35 3

12!3

(28)

Finding the absolute maximum

The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w ≥ 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions.

Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is

V =  35 3

12!3

The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not?

(29)

Finding the absolute maximum

The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w ≥ 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions.

Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is

V =  35 3

12!3

The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not?

To answer this we make two observations:

(30)

Finding the absolute maximum

The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w ≥ 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions.

Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is

V =  35 3

12!3

The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not?

To answer this we make two observations:

For a fixed l (say l = 1), we have h = 35−w1+w . As w → 0, we see that h → 35 and the volume tends to zero.

(31)

Finding the absolute maximum

The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w ≥ 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions.

Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is

V =  35 3

12!3

The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not?

To answer this we make two observations:

For a fixed l (say l = 1), we have h = 35−w1+w . As w → 0, we see that h → 35 and the volume tends to zero.

As l and w tend towards ∞, we see that h eventually becomes negative, an unreasonable physical assumption.

(32)

Conclusion

We conclude that the critical point is a maximum. Thus the absolute maximum volume occurs at the point

 35 3 12 , 35 3 12 , 35 3 12!

where the volume is

 35 3

32

References

Related documents

In the five rounds following the expulsion vote and before the punishment vote, the average contribution for those in the Green Group fell from 85% to 78% of endowment (in

When technical innovation partially mediates the focal link, apart from the indirect link, the direct EP–FP link is likely to be positive.. If not, the direct EP–FP link is likely to

For most cells, passage of all materials –gases, food molecules, water, waste products, etc. – in and out of the cell must occur through the plasma membrane. As a cell grows

The two following sections introduce mechanisms for assessing and comparing recon- figurations from two orthogonal perspectives: behavioural (section 3), resorting to whichever

The information gathered included the number of EMRS calls and transported patients, patient code classification, mortality at arrival and during transport, response time

Name metz is the mettis metz remained a rich and qualitative range of the future today with public transit directions with maps, while we have to.. Complete a captcha proves you

There was no difference in species richness or abundances of insectivores between primary forests and windbreaks at our study site (Figure 2). Therefore, they do not appear to

então o teste, nas mesmas crianças, porém, em campo livre, sendo este denominado Grupo em estudo um (G1); e na outra metade (20 crianças) o processo foi o inverso,