• No results found

VMLab: A Desktop Virtualization Testbed for Research and Education

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "VMLab: A Desktop Virtualization Testbed for Research and Education"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

VMLab: A Desktop Virtualization Testbed

for Research and Education

Prasad Calyam, Ph.D. (Principal Investigator) [email protected] Alex Berryman (Student Research Assistant) [email protected]

Rohit Patali (Graduate Research Associate) [email protected]

Merit Desktop Virtualization Summit 1st December 2010

(2)

Topics of Discussion

•  VMLab Overview

–  Hardware and Software

–  Project Web-portal

•  VMLab Use Cases

–  Administrator Sandboxes

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Classroom Labs

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Research and Development

•  VDBench Toolkit, NSF GENI Experiment

(3)

Topics of Discussion

•  VMLab Overview

–  Hardware and Software

–  Project Web-portal

•  VMLab Use Cases

–  Administrator Sandboxes

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Classroom Labs

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Research and Development

•  VDBench Toolkit, NSF GENI Experiment

(4)

VMLab Overview

•  OSC/OARnet VMLab – http://vmlab.oar.net

–  Proof-of-concept testbed for desktop virtualization experiments

•  Established in June 2009

–  Sponsors

•  Funding Sources: Ohio Board of Regents, VMware, Dell, National Science Foundation

•  Hardware/Software Donations: IBM, VMware, HP, Wyse, Dell

–  Used for various tabletop experiments over the last 8 months

•  Research: Desktop Pools Management, Application Virtualization, Thin Client Protocols Evaluation, “VDBench” v0.1 Tool Development

•  Classroom Labs: Moldflow for OSU ISE Dept., Remote Visualization w/GPU for OSU SAIC, Remote Instrumentation for YSU Chemistry

(5)

Virtual Desktop Infrastructure

•  VMware View is one of the popularly used VDI solutions

–  Personalized user desktops, applications and data access while maintaining centralized control and security

(6)

VMLab Hardware Components

•  IBM donation to VMLab – 50+ desktop users can be supported

–  2 IBM HS22 Intel Blade Servers

•  2 Quad Core CPU’s each, 32 GB of RAM each, 4 NIC’s each

–  9 TB Shared SAS Storage + 300 GB Solid State Array

•  Network Emulator – Dual-NIC PC-router

•  Thin Clients

–  HP t5730, Dell FX100, WYSE C90, Teradici Zero State Client, Pano Logic Zero State Client, Wyse PocketCloud for iPhone/iPad, Microsoft RDP, Open-source VNC

(7)

VMLab Software Components

•  VMware vSphere 4.5 (ESXi 4.5); View 4.5

Windows Server 2003

•  vCenter, View Manager, View Composer, ThinApp, Active Directory, (vCloud Director)

•  Virtual Machines – Windows XP, Ubuntu Linux, Fedora Linux

•  Network Emulator – Netem on Linux Kernel 2.6.15

•  User Applications

–  Novice User: MS Word, Acrobat Reader, IE Browser

–  Expert User: MS Word, Acrobat Reader, IE Browser, Windows Media, Flash Video, Matlab, MoldFlow, VLC Player, VolSuite

(8)

VMLab Project Web-portal

•  Project Website and Testbed Gateway - http://vmlab.oar.net

•  Central site for information on VMLab testbed resources and capabilities

•  Placeholder for study results, presentations and the virtual desktop performance benchmarking toolkit release (VDBench v0.1)

•  Enables hands-on access to run your own remote desktop virtualization experiments in VMLab!

(9)

Topics of Discussion

•  VMLab Overview

–  Hardware and Software

–  Project Web-portal

•  VMLab Use Cases

–  Administrator Sandboxes

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Classroom Labs

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Research and Development

•  VDBench Toolkit, NSF GENI Experiment

(10)

Use Case: Administrator Sandboxes

•  Users and their Requirements

–  Central State University

•  Install VMware technologies, Test configuration options

–  The Ohio State University

•  Web-portal VM staging, Electronic Lab Notebook

–  Belmont Technical College

•  Deploy and administer of Windows XP/7 Desktops

–  Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine & Pharmacy

•  Deploy and administer of Windows XP/7 Desktops, Video Streaming

–  University of Findlay

•  Install VMware technologies, Test configuration options

–  Baldwin Wallace College

•  Install VMware technologies, Test configuration options

–  Bowling Green University

(11)

VM Environment and Networking Setup

•  Each Sandbox had a dedicated virtual network with separate

blade, storage and firewall resources

–  User meetings, requirements gathering, MOUs, Billing, …

•  VPN had to be setup for WAN connections

–  Avoids having public IP address to all VMs

•  PCoIP protocol client must be able to directly connect to virtual desktop with a public IP address or a VPN

–  OpenVPN server was deployed with

pfSense

on a VM to

accept VPN connections from any external IP address

•  Virtual pfSense server also is a firewall appliance that we used

to handle all traffic between the virtual desktops and the Internet •  Firewall rules were set/modified to block access to certain ports

(12)

Classroom Labs

•  Users and their Requirements

–  The Ohio State University, Dept. of Chemistry

•  Electronic Lab Notebook for scientific instrument data management

–  The Ohio State University, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering

•  Multiple Moldflow VMs

•  Data sharing and folder permissions to enable faculty/student group access, content management

–  Faculty distributed source files and documents by placing them in a write-protected network share mapped to Z: drive on each student VM

•  Moldex3D VMs for student simulations

–  The Ohio State University, Small Animal Imaging Center

(13)

VolQuiz Remote Visualization Demo-I

•  VMware View Manager does not have capabilities to directly interface with GPU hardware

•  Evaluated solutions involving connection brokers and gatekeepers to help improve user accessibility and ease-of-use for remote

visualization over wide-area networks

(14)

VolQuiz Remote Visualization Demo-II

•  Evaluated integration of state-of-the-art thin client protocols such as PCoIP with encapsulation of custom VNC remote access solutions •  Demo at Summer 2010 Internet2/ESCC Joint Techs Conference,

(15)

Motivations for Research

•  Recent advances in thin clients and the numerous benefits in

transitioning user desktops to cloud environments

–  Convenience, Cost savings, Green IT, Security, …

•  Need for “

system-aware

”, “

network-aware

”, “

human-aware

frameworks and tools to deploy virtual desktop clouds

–  Existing work focuses mainly upon system (i.e., CPU and memory) measurements for server-side resource adaptation

–  Our focus is to couple client-and-server resource adaptation with measurements of network health and user experience

•  Minimize cloud resource over-commitment

•  Avoid guesswork in configuring thin client protocols •  Deliver optimum user experience of virtual applications

(16)

VMLab Experiments

•  VDI Scalability

–  Stress test VMs under various user application work loads

•  User Applications: MS Excel, IE Browser, Windows Media Player, Matlab

–  We used “Autoit” user application work loads (scripts for

repeatable and automated GUI interactions with key presses, mouse movements)

•  VDI Reliability

–  Evaluate performance of remote desktop protocols

•  Protocols Evaluated: Microsoft Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), HP Remote Graphics Software (RGS), Teradici PC-over-IP (PCoIP), VNC Remote Frame Buffer Protocol (RFB)

–  We used Netem for network (e.g., bandwidth, delay, loss) emulation

(17)
(18)
(19)

VMLab Experiments

I. User Load Simulation

(20)

Cloud Experiments on NSF GENI Facility

•  Extend VMLab to a virtual desktop cloud with 3 data centers in

the NSF GENI Testbed Facility – http://www.geni.net

–  West, South & East US locations with L2/L3 network connectivity –  Install VMware ESXi, Other hypervisors, VDBench tools, …

•  Provision “sandbox” and “desktop” VMs within User slices

–  For GENI experimenters, Classroom Labs, Internet users, … –  VMs will host trial and open-source software for users

•  OS (e.g., Windows 7, Ubuntu), Office Suite (e.g., Word, GIMP), Gaming

Server (e.g., Counter Strike), Scientific computing (e.g., Matlab, Octave) –  Users generate synchronous and asynchronous loads

•  Profile “monitor” and “user” VMs under various load conditions

and investigate decision schemes for resource allocation

–  “Monitor” VMs are instrumented to perform experiment runs –  User loads trigger performance data logging in monitor VMs

(21)

Anticipated Duration of Experiments

•  Synthetic profiling experiments generally take 2 hrs for a load

point, hence about 100 hrs (4 days) for a total run

•  Real user profiling experiments might need atleast 14 days for

a total run

–  Total run time is the sampling duration of active VM usage that provides a baseline to develop a user profile snapshot

–  Industry standard is 45 days…

•  Longer sampling periods help in better profiling

•  We expect to have several experiment runs based on a variety

of virtual desktop application use cases

(22)

Potential Research Questions

•  What are trends of thin-client based user activities and their

impact on resource consumption in virtual desktop pools?

–  Is memory the most contended resource in virtual desktop

clouds? (i.e., users will idle CPUs but keep their desktop applications open)

•  What are the challenges in coupling network and human

performance components in decision schemes?

–  What are the trade-offs in client-based (e.g., VNC) versus server-based thin client adaptation (e.g., RGS)? (i.e., thin client protocol

consuming less resources is due to network bottleneck or light usage)

•  How to build scalable testbeds that can support thin-client

based virtual desktop staging experiments?

–  How to develop effective VM benchmarking tools as well as synthetic load profiles that emulate real user loads? (i.e., characteristics of steady state, spikes/bursts, flash crowds)

(23)

Topics of Discussion

•  VMLab Overview

–  Hardware and Software

–  Project Web-portal

•  VMLab Use Cases

–  Administrator Sandboxes

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Classroom Labs

•  User requests, VM environment and networking setup

–  Research and Development

•  VDBench Toolkit, NSF GENI Experiment

(24)

Remote Instrumentation Proof-of-Concept

•  VMLab as a platform to evaluate technologies before transitioning

users into HPC and networking production environments

(25)

VMLab Future Work

•  Shared services based on VMware technologies to provide

testbed access to USO user communities

–  For institutions that lack resources to build similar testbeds •  Evaluate upcoming VMware View features, Windows 7

migration, etc.

–  Persistent and Non-persistent desktops for testing amongst scientific user communities

–  VMware related disaster data recovery service –  Community cloud pilot studies

–  Cyber-security research, e.g., virtual machines to attract and analyze web-malware

(26)

References

Related documents

Representatives from the seven (7) grantee groups as well as the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma (ATS-COT), American

Depending on the inservice topic and the staff in attendance, begin the inservice by either formally stating a few objectives of the inservice or informally asking staff to

The quay charge is payment for the use of Trondheim Port Authority's quays, and is paid according to length of stay, although never less than for 24 hours.. Length of stay is

Namun hal tersebut tidak sejalan dengan penelitian yang di lakukan oleh Angra (2011), yang menyatakan bahwa Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) sebagai variabel moderasi

The results indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship between computer anxiety and sensory-intuitive learning styles, in that the students

1) The project contributes to analytical models of factors shaping children’s experience of online risks and opportunities. I observed that online activities are

In order to picture the overall performance of the selected alignment tools, we determined the fraction of reads that could not be mapped (unmapped), that mapped to multiple

Average recognition rates (in %) on IXMAS dataset for different combination strategies for our local method compared against the global SVM and BoW SVM baselines.. Method Local