• No results found

Vol 2, No 7 (2011)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 2, No 7 (2011)"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Available online through

www.ijma.info

UNIQUE FIXED POINT THEOREMS ON HAUSDORFF SPACES

1

Zaheer K. Ansari*,

2

Rajesh Shrivastava and

3

Arun Garg

1

Department of Applied Mathematics, JSS Academy of Technical education, C – 20/1, Sector 62, Noida – 201301, U.P. (India)

E-mail: [email protected]

2

Department of Mathematics, Govt. Science & Commerce College Benazir, Bhopal, M.P. (India)

E-mail: [email protected]

3

Department of Mathematics, Institute of Technology & Management, ITM Campus, N. H. – 75, Jhansi Road, Gwalior, M. P. – 474001 (India)

E-mail: [email protected]

(Received on: 11-06-11; Accepted on: 30-06-11)

--- ABSTRACT

I

n present paper, some fixed point theorems in Hausdorff spaces have been proved, which generalize the theorem of YEH, C.C. [2].

X

y

x

y

x

d

Ty

Tx

d

(

,

)

<

(

,

);

,

.

Keywords and Phrases: Result on Hausdorff spaces, fixed point theorem.

MSC (2000): 54H25, 28A78.

---

INTRODUCTION:

In 1962, M. Edelstein [1] proved the following result:

Theorem 1: Let (X,d) be a metric space, T be a contractive self-mapping of X. If for some

x

X

, the sequence of iterates

{

T

n

x

}

has a convergent subsequence

{

T

ni

x

}

converging to a point

x

0

X

, then

x

0

=

lim

{

T

n

x

}

is unique fixed point.

Singh, S.P. and Zorzitto [3] generalized the result of M. Edelstein [1].

Here, we prove the following theorems, which generalized the result of YEH, C.C. [2]:

Theorem 2: Let T be a continuous mapping of a Housdorff space X into itself and let f be a continuous mapping of X×X into non-negative reals such that

X

x

x

x

f

(

,

)

=

0

;

and

f

(

x

,

y

)

0

,

x

,

y

X

,

x

y

(2.1)

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

z

f

x

y

f

y

z

f

+

, for all x, y, z in X (2.2)

(

,

)

2

1

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

)

,

(

Tx

Ty

q

f

x

y

f

x

Tx

f

y

Ty

f

y

Tx

f

x

Ty

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

Ty

y

f

Tx

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

Tx

y

f

Ty

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

Ty

Tx

f

y

x

f

Ty

x

f

y

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

Ty

Tx

f

y

x

f

Ty

Tx

f

Ty

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

Ty

Tx

f

y

x

f

Ty

x

f

Tx

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

Ty

Tx

f

y

x

f

Ty

x

f

Ty

y

f

+

,

+

+

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

)]

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

[

Ty

Tx

f

y

x

f

Ty

y

f

Ty

x

f

Ty

Tx

f

y

x

f

(2.3)

--- 1

(2)

July-2011, Page: 1040-1045

© 2011, IJMA. All Rights Reserved 1041

hold for all

x

,

y

X

where

q

[

0

,

1

)

. Then T has a unique fixed point in X.

Proof: Let

x

0 be an arbitrary point in X and a sequence

{

x

n

}

defined by

Tx

n

=

x

n+1, n a positive integer. If for some n,

Tx

n

=

x

n then

x

n is a fixed point. If not

Tx

n

x

n then by (2.3), we have.

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

1

x

2

f

Tx

0

Tx

1

f

=

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

),

,

(

2

1

)

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

1 0

2 1 1 0 2 0 1

1 2 1 1 0 1 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

q

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1 0

1 1 2 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1

0

2 0 1 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1

0

2 1 2 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1

0

2 0 1 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1

0

2 0 2 1

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

+

,

+

+

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1

0

2 1 2 0 2

1 1 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

+

{

(

,

)

(

,

)},

(

,

),

0

,

(

,

)

2

1

,

0

),

,

(

)

,

(

),

,

(

max

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

f

x

1

x

2

f

x

0

x

1

q

,

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

),

f

(

x

0

,

x

1

),

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

),

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

}

i.e.

[

(

,

)

+

(

,

)]

2

1

)

,

(

),

,

(

max

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

q

Then we have either

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

<

qf

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

which is a contradiction as q<1

or

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

<

qf

(

x

0

,

x

1

)

<

f

(

x

0

,

x

1

)

as q<1

and

(

,

)

(

,

)

2

)

,

(

1 2

f

x

0

x

1

qf

x

0

x

1

q

q

x

x

f

<

f

(

x

0

,

x

1

)

as q<1 Proceeding in the same manner we have

...

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

0

x

1

>

f

x

1

x

2

>

f

x

2

x

3

>

f

Thus we have a monotone sequence of positive reals which converges with all it subsequences to some

x

X

, x being real.

Again

{

x

n

}

has a convergent subsequence

{

}

k n

x

in X which converges to some

x

X

. From the continuity of T,

we have

{

x

n

}

Tx

n

T

Tx

=

lim

=

lim

=

lim

(

x

n+1

)

{

1

}

2

lim

)

(

)

(

x

=

T

Tx

=

T

x

nk+

T

=

lim

{

Tx

nk+1

}

=

x

n+2

Now we are to prove that x is a fixed point for T.

(

lim

,

lim

1

)

)

,

(

x

Tx

=

f

x

n

x

n+

f

(3)

July-2011, Page: 1040-1045

Again by (2.3) we have

(

,

)

2

1

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

)

,

(

Tx

T

2

x

q

f

x

Tx

f

x

Tx

f

Tx

T

2

x

f

Tx

Tx

f

x

T

2

x

f

,

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

Tx

x

f

x

T

Tx

f

Tx

x

f

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

Tx

x

f

Tx

Tx

f

x

T

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 2

x

T

Tx

f

Tx

x

f

x

T

x

f

Tx

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 2 2

x

T

Tx

f

Tx

x

f

x

T

Tx

f

x

T

x

f

+

, ,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 2 2

x

T

Tx

f

Tx

x

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

Tx

f

+

,

+

+

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 2 2 2

x

T

Tx

f

Tx

x

f

x

T

Tx

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

Tx

f

Tx

x

f

{

(

,

)

+

(

,

)

}

2

1

,

0

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

f

x

Tx

f

x

Tx

f

Tx

T

2

x

f

x

Tx

f

Tx

T

2

x

q

,

f

(

Tx

,

T

2

x

),

0

,

f

(

x

,

Tx

),

f

(

Tx

,

T

2

x

),

f

(

x

,

Tx

),

f

(

Tx

,

T

2

x

),

f

(

Tx

,

T

2

x

)

}

[

(

,

)

+

(

,

)]

2

1

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

f

x

Tx

f

Tx

T

2

x

f

x

Tx

f

Tx

T

2

x

q

which gives

)

,

(

)

,

(

Tx

T

2

x

q

f

x

Tx

f

f

(

x

,

Tx

)

as q<1

So we arrive at a contradiction hence

x

=

Tx

i.e. x is a fixed point for T.

Uniqueness: Let y (

x

) be another fixed point. Then by (2.3) we have

(

,

)

2

1

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

)

,

(

x

y

q

f

x

y

f

x

x

f

y

y

f

y

x

f

x

y

f

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

y

y

f

x

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

x

y

f

y

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

),

,

(

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

+

,

(

,

)

(

,

)

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

y

f

+

,

+

+

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

y

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

y

q

f

x

y

f

x

y

f

<

which is a contradiction as q<1

Hence x = y i.e. x is a unique fixed point of T.

This completes the proof of the theorem.

Theorem 3: Let

T

1 and

T

2 be two commuting continuous mapping of a Hausdorff space X into it self and let f be a symmetric continuous mapping of X×X into non-negative reals such that

X

x

x

x

f

(

,

)

=

0

and

f

(

x

,

y

)

0

x

,

y

X

,

x

y

(3.1)

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

z

f

x

y

f

y

z

f

+

(3.2)

(

,

),

(

,

),

(

,

)

2

1

)

,

(

),

,

(

max

)

,

(

T

1

x

T

2

y

q

f

x

y

f

y

T

1

x

f

x

T

2

y

f

y

T

2

y

f

y

T

1

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1 2

(4)

July-2011, Page: 1040-1045

© 2011, IJMA. All Rights Reserved 1043

hold for all

x

,

y

X

where

q

[

0

,

1

)

. If for some

x

0

X

, the sequence

{

x

n

}

where

T

1

x

2n

=

x

2n+1 and 2

2 1 2

2

x

n+

=

x

n+

T

for n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ... has a convergent. Subsequence of the type

{

x

(2p+1)n

}

where

p

N

, is fixed and

n

N

, then

T

1 and

T

2 have a unique fixed point.

Proof: Using (3.3) we have

)

,

(

)

(

x

1,

x

2

f

T

1

x

0

T

2

x

1

f

=

(

,

)

,

2

1

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

0 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 2

q

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

+

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 2 1

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

+

+

+

+

+

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 1 1 0 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 0

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

x

x

f

{

(

,

)

+

(

,

)

}

2

1

,

0

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

q

Then we have either

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

q

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

which is a contradiction as q<1.

or

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

qf

(

x

0

,

x

1

)

as q<1. and

(

,

)

2

)

,

(

1 2

f

x

0

x

1

q

q

x

x

f

as q<1.

Repeating this argument we have

...

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

0

x

1

>

f

x

1

x

2

>

f

x

2

x

3

>

f

Thus, the sequence

{

f

(

x

n

,

x

n+1

)

}

is converging to some z. Again sequence

{

x

n

}

has a subsequence

{

x

(2p+1)2n

}

.

From the continuity of

T

1 and

T

2, we have

T

1

x

=

T

1

lim

x

(2p+1)2n

=

lim

x

(2p+1)2n+1

2 2 ) 1 2 ( 1 2 ) 1 2 ( 2 1

2

T

x

=

T

lim

x

p+ n+

=

lim

x

p+ n+

T

Now, we have to show that x is a fixed point for

T

1 and

T

2, we get

(

(2 1)2 (2 1)2 1

)

1

)

lim

,

,

(

x

T

x

=

f

x

p+ n

x

p+ n+

f

=

f

(

lim

x

(2p+1)2n

,

x

(2p+1)2n+1

)

=

f

(

lim

x

(2p+1)2n+1

,

x

(2p+1)2n+2

)

=

f

(

T

1

x

,

T

2

T

1

x

)

Suppose

x

T

1

x

then by (3.1), we have

,

)

,

(

2

1

),

,

(

)

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

)

,

(

T

1

x

T

2

T

1

x

q

f

x

T

1

x

f

x

T

1

x

f

T

1

x

T

2

T

1

x

f

T

1

x

T

1

x

f

x

T

2

T

1

x

f

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

x

T

f

x

T

T

x

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

+

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

f

x

T

x

f

+

+

+

+

+

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

T

x

f

x

T

T

x

T

f

x

T

x

f

Implies

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

T

1

x

T

2

T

1

x

qf

x

T

1

x

f

x

T

1

x

(5)

July-2011, Page: 1040-1045

Thus

x

=

T

1

x

, similarly if

{

x

(2p+1)2n+1

}

be subsequence of

{

x

(2p+1)n

}

then we can get easily

x

=

T

2

x

. Therefore x is a fixed point for

T

1 and

T

2.

Uniqueness: Let

y

(

x

)

be another fixed point of

T

1 and

T

2. By applying (3.3) we can prove that

f

(

T

1

x

,

T

2

y

)

f

(

x

,

y

)

, a contradiction as q<1.

Hence x is a unique fixed point of

T

1 and

T

2.

This completes the proof of the theorem.

Theorem 4: Let

T

1

,

T

2

,

T

3

,...

T

n be continuous mappings of a Hausdorff space X into itself and let f be a continuous mapping of X x X into the non-negative reals such that

X

x

x

x

f

(

,

)

=

0

and

f

(

x

,

y

)

0

x

,

y

X

,

x

y

(4.1)

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

z

f

x

y

f

y

z

f

+

(4.2)

),

,

(

2

1

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

)

,

(

T

x

T

1

y

q

f

x

y

f

x

T

x

f

x

T

1

y

f

y

T

x

f

x

T

1

y

f

r r+

r r+ r r+

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1 1 1

1

x

T

x

T

f

y

x

f

y

T

x

f

y

x

f

y

x

f

y

T

x

f

x

T

y

f

y

x

f

y

T

y

f

x

T

x

f

r r

r r

r r

r

+ + +

+

+

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

,

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1

y

T

T

f

y

x

f

y

T

y

f

y

T

x

f

y

T

x

T

f

y

x

f

y

T

x

f

y

T

x

T

f

y

T

x

T

f

y

x

f

y

T

x

f

x

T

x

f

r r

r r

r r

r r

r

r r

r r

+ + +

+ + +

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ +

+

)

,

(

)

,

(

2

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

1

1 1

1

y

T

x

T

f

y

x

f

y

T

y

f

y

T

x

f

y

T

x

T

f

y

x

f

r r

r r

r

r (4.3)

hold for all distinct

x

,

y

X

where

q

[

0

,

1

)

and

T

k

x

=

x

k+1.

If for some

x

0

X

, the sequence

{

x

n

}

where

1 2

3 3 1 2 2 0 1

1

=

T

x

,

x

=

T

x

,

x

=

T

x

,...

...

...

x

k

=

T

k

x

r−

x

... ...

1 2 2

1 2 2 1

1

,

+ +

,...

...

...

.

+

=

k k

=

k k

=

k k

k

T

x

x

T

x

x

T

x

x

1 ) 1 ( ) 1 ( 1

2 2 1

1

,

+ +

...

...

+ + −

+

=

n n

=

n n

=

k n k

nk

T

x

k

x

k

T

x

k

x

k k

T

x

k

x

for n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ... has a convergent subsequence of the type

{

x

mk+1

}

where

m

N

is fixed and

n

N

. Then

k

T

T

T

T

1

,

2

,

3

,...

has a unique fixed point.

Proof: Using (4.3) we have

[

+

]

=

(

,

)

(

,

)

2

1

,

0

),

,

(

),

,

(

),

,

(

max

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

1

x

2

f

T

1

x

0

T

2

x

1

q

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

f

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

),

0

,

f

(

x

0

,

x

1

),

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

),

f

(

x

0

,

x

1

),

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

f

(

x

1

,

x

2

)

[

(

,

)

+

(

,

)

]

2

1

),

,

(

,

,

(

max

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

f

x

0

x

1

f

x

1

x

2

q

(6)

July-2011, Page: 1040-1045

© 2011, IJMA. All Rights Reserved 1045

Analogously

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

2

x

3

f

x

1

x

2

f

<

...

f

(

x

k−1

,

x

k

)

<

f

(

x

k−2

,

x

k−1

)

By (4.3) we have

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

k

x

k 1

f

T

k

x

k 1

T

k

x

k

f

+

=

− +

[

(

,

)

+

(

,

+

)

]

2

1

)

,

(

)

,

(

max

f

x

k 1

x

k

f

x

k

x

k 1

f

x

k 1

x

k

f

x

k

x

k 1

q

implies

)

,

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

k

x

k 1

qf

x

k 1

x

k

f

x

k 1

x

k

f

+

<

− as q<1

Hence

)

,

(

)

,

(

x

n

x

n1

f

x

n1

x

n

f

+

<

− , n = 0, 1, 2, 3,…

The uniqueness of

T

1

,

T

2

,

T

3

,....

T

k is similar as of theorem-3.

This completes the proof of theorem.

REFERENCE:

[1] Edelstein, M : On fixed and periodic points under contractive mappings. J. London Math Soc. 37, 74 – 79 (1962).

[2] Yeh, C.C. : Some fixed point theorems. Boll Greek Math Soc. 21 (1980), 47–58.

[3] Singh, S.P. and Zorzitto : On fixed point theorem in metric spaces. Ext. Des Annales De Lu Soc. Sci. Bruzelles, 85 (1971), 117 – 123.

References

Related documents

This increase in the importance of Pityokteines species as forest pests of Silver fir in Croatia, prompted research on the biology of these bark beetles species and on their mite

While LRRK2 PD resembles idiopathic PD in many ways, the presence of a substantial percentage of cases without α -synuclein pathology has led to some confusion about

In the example of Flickr, it is within this space that the work of coding the software via Flickr’s open application programming interface (API), sharing

(c) Comparison of resistance rates for strains from treatment-naïve adult patients and individuals in the general population who participated in a health survey The individuals

The polymyxin B Etest showed unaccept- able 38 (48,7%) minor errors and 1 (1,2%) very major error comparing with the broth microdilution test (the reference method), whereas

05 The Form in which the Centre is to be started The proposed NICE will have to be built upon the existing 'infra structure' available in the Information Division of CLRI..

The co-crystal batches of Doxorubicin HCl-Quercetin hydrate in ratio 1:1, 1:2, 2:1 and Doxorubicin HCl-Naringin in ratio 1:1 are prepared by slow solvent evaporation