• No results found

How To Make A Sovereign Annuity

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "How To Make A Sovereign Annuity"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Irish Institute of Pensions Management

Sovereign Annuities

A presentation to the Irish Institute of Pensions Management by Keith Burns

(2)

2

Agenda

1.

Background

2.

Overview of sovereign annuities

3.

Risks

4.

Examples & uses

5.

Issues for Trustees & Employers

(3)

Background

Sovereign annuity concept was first proposed early 2010

Idea originally put forward by the IAPF and the SAI

Key objectives:

• A fairer balance between actives/deferred pensioners and pensioners

• Improve DB sustainability at least in the short term

• A practical solution that might actually get implemented

Not a substitute for long term pension policy changes

• Broader changes to address equity issues – e.g. pensioner priority

• Broader changes to address DB sustainability – e.g. ‘core’ benefit approach

A long gestation period!

• Sovereign annuity products expected on the shelves by June 2012

Some tough decisions lie ahead for Trustees/Employers

(4)

Background –

Reaction to Sovereign Annuities

Diverse views and comments:

“Vital to our national recovery” – Eamonn O’Cuiv, Minister for Social Protection- December 2010

Concept is supported by both IBEC and ICTU

“The Society of Actuaries in Ireland welcomes the new flexibility that sovereign annuities will create….However, as noted, there are risks attached……” - SAI briefing statement

“It opens up new options for trustees in terms of reducing liabilities within the scheme, but it does add a new risk to pensioners. Trustees will have to consider their options very carefully.” – IAPF

This is yet another example of the “insiders” in Ireland saving their own skins and giving the bill and the attendant risk to the “outsiders” – the ordinary

Joe…..This initiative is yet another example of pyramid scheme thinking – David McWilliams

(5)

Background –

10 year bond yields and timelines

0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00

Germany Ireland

2009

2010

Sovereign Annuity

concept proposed

National Recovery Plan

5

(6)

Conventional vs Sovereign annuity

Conventional annuity

Pays an income for the

member’s lifetime

Payments are not reduced if

the investments do not

perform

Invested in low-risk assets (e.g.

German bonds)

Sovereign annuity

Pays an income for life…but linked to specified bonds.

Payments can be reduced due to an “event of non-performance”

Lower Funding Standard liability

Can be linked to bonds issued by any EU Member State

(7)

Sovereign annuity options

Buy-in

Annuity is owned by the Trust

Immediate reduction in

liabilities but Scheme retains credit risk

Pensions continue to be paid from the scheme

Requirement to notify members

Buy-out

Annuity is owned by the member

Immediate reduction in liabilities and risk is transferred to pensioner

Pensions paid by the insurer under individual annuities

Detailed communication with members

(8)

Types of sovereign annuity

Ireland only

Price discount of 20-25%

relative to conventional

annuities

Assumes yield of 6% on NTMA

coupon-only bonds

Eurozone Government Bonds

Price discount of 3-4% relative

to conventional annuities

Assumes yield of 4% on bonds

(9)

Key risks

Benefit reduction/Cashflow risk

– Pensioner could receive no income for a period of months or years! Credit risk

– Scheme or pensioner bears the credit risk Illiquidity risk

– Annuity contracts cannot typically be surrendered Concentration of risk

– Investment in Irish sovereign annuities or sovereign bonds would increase the scheme’s exposure to the Irish State

Reputational risk

(10)

Funding impact

Scenario 1: Buy-in all pensioner liabilities

with a sovereign annuity

Before After*

€m €m

Liabilities

Pensioners (no increases) 100 80

Actives & Deferred (no increases) 50 50 Increases for Pensioners 30 24 Increases for Actives & Deferred 15 15

Total 195 169

Assets 120 120

Deficit (75) (49) Annual cost of removing deficit 9.7 6.3 Cover for pensioners 100% 100% Cover for Actives & Deferred 40% 80%

* Assumes reduction in liabilities of 20%

(11)

Funding impact

Scenario 2: Buy-in pensions under €20K with a conventional annuity

and pensions over €20K and increases with a sovereign annuity

Before After*

€m €m

Liabilities

Pensions up to €20K (no increases) 80 80 Pensions over €20K (no increases) 20 16

Actives & Deferred (no increases) 50 50 Increases for Pensioners 30 24

Increases for Actives & Deferred 15 15

Total 195 185

Assets 120 120

Deficit (75) (65) Annual cost of removing deficit 9.7 8.4 Cover for pensioners 100% 100% Cover for Actives & Deferred 40% 48%

* Assumes reduction in liabilities of 20% 11

(12)

Uses of sovereign annuities

Termination/Restructuring

– Scheme winding-up in deficit with insolvent Employer

– An alternative to immediate benefit reduction using a Section 50 application

– Perhaps as part of a blended product (core conventional annuity with sovereign annuity top-up)

On-going/No re-structuring

– Sovereign annuity buy-out unlikely to be acceptable to Trustees

– Trustees may consider sovereign annuity buy-in or sovereign bonds if additional security available

• Contingent asset

– Letter of credit

– Escrow account

– Charge against an asset

– Employer guarantee

(13)

Sovereign Bonds

• Schemes can hold Sovereign Bonds directly as an alternative to purchasing Sovereign Annuities and still avail of the Funding Standard reduction

• What is the definition of Sovereign Bond?

• In order to avail of Funding Standard reduction schemes must:

• Commit to securing Sovereign Annuities on wind-up

• Can only avail of the Funding Standard reduction to the extent they hold Sovereign Bonds

• Non-performance risk is retained by the actives and deferreds

• Likely to be an option favoured by larger schemes

• May offer greater flexibility/value for money

• Critical outstanding issues are:

• What pricing basis to value the pensioner liability?

• What happens in a wind-up?

(14)

Trustee issues

Balance of powers under Trust Deed & Rules

Contribution rule/Notice period

Legislative protection

Where Trustees have acted ‘honestly and reasonably’

Value for money

Reputational risk

Opportunistic Company-led wind ups

Need to understand the risks and implications for all members

Products are complex and unlikely to be readily understood by pensioners

Clear need for legal advice

(15)

Employer issues

Accounting impact

Settlement gain/loss recognised in a buy-out

Expected return on assets will change in a buy-in

Impact on long term funding costs

Another incentive towards de-risking

Recent IAS19 accounting changes

Introduction of risk reserves

Reputational risks

Sovereign annuity buy-in or direct holdings of Sovereign Bonds would still leave Employer exposed to risk of higher contributions if bonds do not perform

(16)

Trustee job will get even harder

Significant reputational risks for pension industry

Company versus Trustee advice

Fundamentally alters DB promise

May improve the sustainability of DB schemes

Are there better ways to address equity and

sustainability issues?

Address pensioner priority issue

‘Core’ benefit approach

16

(17)

Where to next?

Products expected to be available by June

Guidance still awaited on Funding Standard discount

available where Scheme holds sovereign bonds

directly

Wide range of options for Trustees & Employers to

consider

Sovereign Annuities and Bonds will form a key part of

Funding Proposal discussions

References

Related documents

Avista 2013 Electric DSM Business Plan Page 39 For prescriptive programs, energy savings are the product of the estimated per unit energy savings and the estimate

ABSTRACT FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND LAW School of Arts, Law and Management Doctor of Philosophy Corporate Social Responsibility of Multinational Companies in Pakistan By Mohammad

Wipro works with customers to develop end-to-end analytics and information strategy leveraging process assets and solutions based on analytics, business intelligence,

In this paper, a conceptual model on integrating SCOR into disaster response risk assessment using FMEA framework is presented and followed with derivation on SCOR

Figure 6.15: Laibach acknowledged by the Nedbank Green Wine Awards 157 Figure 6.16: Reyneke Wines won award as best organic red wine in South Africa in 2015 165 Figure 6.17:

In China’s particular case, since the opening of its economy in the late 1970s, its level of general government final consumption expenditure has been stable at about 15 per cent

(2010) applied a fixed effect threshold model to a panel of 91 countries over the period 1975-2005 and found that positive impact of FDI inflows kick in on the

Steal information through various means; data breach, phishing, mail theft, trash, electronic devices, wallet, ect, used to either receive services or obtain prescriptions