• No results found

Department of Public Health

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Department of Public Health"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Department of Public Health

Edwin M. Lee Barbara A. Garcia, MPA

Mayor Director of Health

Tom´as J. Arag´on, MD, DrPH Health Officer

March 19, 2013

Dear Colleagues,

In San Francisco, citywide public health services are provided by the Division of Population Health and Prevention which has been reorganized into the new Population Health Division (PHD). This letter is to inform you of the new PHD organizational structure and leadership. We be-lieve that through these integration processes we are responding to the needs of our population, clients/consumers and patients by ensuring easier access to the full complement of health promotion and wellness services provided by the San Francisco Department of Public Health.

The first major change is to the name of our Division. Beginning March 19, 2013, we will be known as the Population Health Division of the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) and Sections will now be referred to as Branches. We have also developed new vision and mission statements for PHD. We would like to assure you that the reorganization and all the changes aim to better position PHD for the future. We are committed to continuity of cooperative agreements and projects and to executing all of our current obligations.

Population Health Division Mission Statement: Drawing upon community wisdom and sci-ence, we support, develop, and implement evidence-based policies, practices, and partnerships that protect and promote health, prevent disease and injury, and create sustainable environments and resilient communities.

Population Health Division Vision Statement: To be a community-centered leader in public health practice and innovation.

Below is an outline of the administrative changes that will be implemented to support the integration and new structure for the Division. Please note that your primary contact will remain the same during our transition period and we will inform you of further administrative changes in the future. Population Health Division Branches supporting Assessment and Research

Kyle Bernstein, PhD, ScM, will lead the Applied Research, Community Health Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. This new Branch will coordinate data collection, processing, management, analysis and interpretation related to health and morbidity in San Francisco. Working with private and public clinics, community based organizations, outreach, research, and the laboratories, this Branch will maintain systems to gather, explore, analyze, and present data to inform and guide public health decision-making. Data across conditions, populations, and health status will be integrated to assess and help solve community health problems; diagnose and investigate health problems and health hazards in the community; evaluate effectiveness of interventions and services, and monitor quality.

Will McFarland, MD, PHD, MPH&TM, will lead the Center for Public Health Research. This

(2)

p. 2 of 3

new Branch will provide expertise in epidemiology, clinical trials, evaluations, and implementa-tion science research. Our focus has been on substance use and HIV, but we also assess and address other infectious diseases including viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted infections, diarrhea, malaria, and other pathogens affecting our city and marginalized populations globally. The Branch will provide SFDPH and its partners’ technical training, consultation, expertise, and oversight in population survey design, questionnaire development, data collection modalities, statistical meth-ods, GIS mapping, the conduct of clinical trials, and implementation science. The team is proficient in methodologies to sample and enumerate diverse communities, particularly hidden and hard to reach populations; to conduct cohort studies and pharmacological and behavior intervention trials; and to employ qualitative and mixed methods for health research for disproportionately affected populations in San Francisco and worldwide. Our team brings a wealth of public health research experience from our city and internationally. These focus areas will be leveraged to improve the health of San Francisco and the world.

Susan Buchbinder, MD will continue to lead Bridge HIV. Bridge HIV is one of our Branches that provide global leadership in HIV prevention, research, and education. This Branch works with local and international scientists and communities to discover effective HIV prevention strategies through research, community partnerships, and educational initiatives. Operating as a clinical trials unit within the San Francisco Department of Public Health and affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), to conduct innovative research that guides global approaches to prevent HIV and AIDS.

Population Health Division Branch supporting Policy Development, Public Health Accreditation, and Quality Improvement

Israel Nieves-Rivera will lead the Public Health Accreditation, Equity and Quality Improvement Branch. This new Branch serves as the principal advisor and coordinator of Division-wide efforts to reduce disparities and improve health equity in San Francisco. The Branch will work in partnership with the DPH Policy and Planning Section to develop and implement a legislative agenda; as well as support the health department’s efforts to achieve and maintain Public Health Accreditation. Accreditation signifies that a health department is meeting national standards for ensuring essential public health services that are provided in the community.

Population Health Division Branches supporting Assurance

Susan Philip, MD, MPH will lead the Disease Prevention and Control Branch of the PHD. This new Branch integrates the core public health communicable disease functions, along with specialty care and treatment, and laboratory diagnostics. The goal is to find opportunities to increase capacity, align services, and deliver effective and efficient services at the client and community level. This Branch will also be responsible for interacting with SFDPH Health Delivery Systems in order to coordinate and maximize disease screening and other prevention activities in primary care and the hospitals.

Tracey Packer, MPH will lead the Community Health Promotion Branch of PHD. This new Branch integrates the core public health functions of informing, educating and empowering community. The goals are to improve and sustain community health and work towards health equity through sus-tainable change approaches, mobilization and community partnerships. Through the use of compre-hensive approaches across the spectrum of prevention, the Branch will continue to plan, implement, and evaluate prioritized community initiatives, including promoting active living, decreasing HIV, sexually transmitted infections, viral hepatitis, and effects of trauma.

Rajiv Bhatia, MD, MPH will continue to lead the Environmental Health Protection, Equity and Sustainability Branch of PHD. This Branch will implement San Francisco’s environmental policies and laws and innovate new policies and programs to ensure safe and nutritious food, quality housing, livable neighborhoods and protection from air pollutants, excessive noise and hazardous chemicals. Navenna Bobba, MD will continue to lead Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response

(3)

p. 3 of 3

(PHEPR). This Branch serves the public, Department of Public Health (DPH), and partners by coordinating health emergency preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. The Branch staff acts as stewards through strategic planning, efficient allocation of resources, and leveraging of SFDPH and citywide capabilities. PHEPR promotes a culture of preparedness to ensure that in an emergency disease and injury are prevented and accessible, timely, and equitable health and clinical services are available.

John Brown, MD will continue as Medical Director of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (located at the Department of Emergency Management). EMS is tasked with oversight of EMS protocols and policies pursuant to Title 22 Division 9 of the California Code of Regulations, Division 2.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Article 14 of the San Francisco Health Code to provide high quality, accessible emergency medical care in both normal operations and disaster settings. Population Health Division Branches supporting Governance, Administration, and System Management

Christine Siador, MPH is the Deputy Director of PHD as will lead the Operations, Finance, and Grants Management Branch. This new Branch integrates core administrative, operations and fiscal functions across all PHD Branches. The goal is to increase capacity and efficiency of administrative functions by pooling and cross-training administrative staff. This will allow for equitable admin-istration across Branches. This Branch will also establish a Performance Management System by which the Division aligns resources, systems and employees to strategic objectives and priorities. The goal of the performance management system will be to encourage, support and reward good performance.

Jonathan Fuchs, MD, MPH has been asked to lead the Center for Learning and Innovation. This new Branch will lead and coordinate professional development activities across the Division to assure a competent public health workforce. The Branch will create novel training opportunities for internal and external groups and develop the workforce of tomorrow by implementing a Division-wide Health Equity Fellows program.

I have attached an overview of the changes in the Division for you to review which includes the organizational chart and description of each Branch. Please welcome the new leadership to these important roles for the future of our Population Health Division.

We look forward to our continued partnership. If you have any questions you can email me at Health.Officer@sfdph.org or contact Christine Siador, MPH, Deputy Director of PHD at 415-554-2832 or by email Christine.Siador@sfdph.org.

Sincerely,

Tom´as J. Arag´on, MD, DrPH

Health Officer, City & County of San Francisco Director, Population Health Division

(4)

The New SFDPH Population Health Division:

Transforming Public Health in San Francisco

Tom´as J. Arag´on, MD, DrPH

March 12, 2013

The San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH), Division of Population Health and Prevention (PHP) is re-organizing into the new Population Health Division. The SFDPH mission is “To protect and promote the health of all San Franciscans.” Our vision is “To be a community-centered leader in public health practice and innovation,” and our mission: “Drawing upon community wisdom and science, we support, develop, and im-plement evidence-based policies, practices, and partnerships that protect and promote health, prevent disease and injury, and create sustainable environments and resilient communities.” The reorganization will (1) integrate health assessment, surveillance, epidemiology, and informatics to support division, departmental, and citywide efforts; (2) integrate commu-nicable disease prevention and control services; (3) integrate specialists in community en-gagement, planning, and mobilization to focus on health promotion and health education in communities; and (4) create a division-wide infrastructure to support professional devel-opment, continuous quality improvement, grant development and management, operations and fiscal efficiency, and public health accreditation.

Why reorganize?

For many years PHP consisted of autonomous sections that reported directly to the Health Officer: Community Health Promotion and Prevention, Environmental and Occupational Health, Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, Public Health Laboratories, Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, STD Prevention and Control, Tuberculosis Control, HIV Surveillance and Epidemiology, HIV Prevention, and HIV Research (now BridgeHIV). Most of our funding and activities have been categorical (disease-focused) and we have been successful in leading the nation in practice innovations and research. In spite of these strengths, our categorical structure, and lack of infrastructure to coordinate and align activities, has severely limited our ability to adapt and respond to a rapidly changing external environment.

The nationally recognized “Triple Aim” (Figure 1 on page 4) provides a framework for assessing and categorizing the “triple threat” we face: emerging changes in public health and health care problems, practices, and financing. By reorganizing, we are strategically positioning ourselves to not only survive and thrive, but to embrace and respond to public health leadership opportunities.

(5)

Public Health "Triple Aim" Population Health Financing & Costs Essential Services Health Care "Triple Aim" HEALTH COSTS CARE

Figure 1: The Health Care Triple Aim is a framework for improving health, care, and costs; likewise, the Public Health Triple Aim is a framework for assessing and improving (a) population health and health equity, (b) public health practice and the ten essential services, and (c) financing, costs, and resource availability (e.g., trained workforce).

(1) Responding to emerging public health problems

With the exception of HIV/AIDS and viral hepatitis, infectious diseases are no longer lead-ing causes of morbidity and mortality. The emerglead-ing and persistent public health problems include: epidemic of adult and youth obesity, and its complications (e.g., childhood Type 2 diabetes and hypertension); ethnic, economic, and neighborhood health inequities; and an aging population. We increasingly recognize how the social, economic, built environ-ment, and childhood adverse events greatly influence health throughout the lifespan. We are shifting our emphasis from almost exclusively treating and preventing diseases, to also protecting and promoting health and wellness.

(2) Responding to changing public health practice

Public health practice is changing: we are moving from reacting to event-driven triggers (e.g., reportable communicable diseases and outbreaks) to proactive, community-centered assessments, policy development, policy solutions, and enforcement. While health care ser-vices are moving to patient-centered homes, public health is similarly moving to community-centered, “health in all policies” approaches. Epidemiology, a basic science of public health, is expanding to include public health informatics, knowledge management, and strategic decision support. Our skills now include health impact assessments (HIAs), multi-criteria decision making, social network analysis, and system dynamics and epidemic modeling. Public health accreditation requires comprehensive community health engagement and as-sessments, community health improvement planning, departmental strategic planning, per-formance management and continuous quality improvement systems, and operational plans to address health equity and social determinants of health. These changes are also being driven by national and state guidelines and priorities: The National Prevention Strategy, National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care, Healthy People 2020, and Let’s Get Healthy California.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, abbreviated

(6)

HITECH Act, was enacted under Title XIII of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Under the HITECH Act, the United States Department of Health and Human Services is spending $26 billion to promote and expand the adoption of health information technology (HIT). This IT investment in health care services has the potential to leave public health IT behind. We must modernize our information systems and leverage the investments in HIT.

We will be developing an integrated data solution for communicable disease surveillance. This will help us achieve the following: (a) Client-centered system (a person or a case is only registered once); (b) Integrated and improved DPH IT support of one system; (c) Improved data exchange and sharing among public health investigators; (d) Integration with eClinicalWorks (new electronic health record); (e) Improved security settings and user authorizations; (f) Integrated electronic laboratory reporting (ELR); (g) Integrated system for case management, contact tracing, and outbreak management; (h) Secure access point for providers (hospitals, clinics, laboratories) to view reported cases; and (i) health care reform and Meaningful Use requirements.

(3) Responding to changing public health financing

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) not only increases access to health care, but also places greater emphasis on disease prevention and health promotion to control costs. In the U.S. the ACA Public Health and Prevention Fund is supporting the following: help control the obesity epidemic; fight health disparities; detect and quickly respond to health threats; reduce tobacco use; train the nation’s public health workforce; modernize vaccine systems; prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS; increase public health programs’ effec-tiveness and efficiency; and improve access to behavioral health services. In San Francisco we are the recipient of a 5-year $4 million Community Transformation Grant (CTG) to increase healthy eating and active living, to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke in multi-unit housing, and to develop clinic-commmulti-unity partnerships to reduce high cholesterol and blood pressure.

With these changes in funding priorities we anticipate reductions in disease-specific, categorical funding, with possible increases in prevention and wellness funding (e.g., CTG). We need to be organized and ready to pursue and secure new funding opportunities for disease prevention and health promotion in the community and clinics.

(4) Responding to public health leadership opportunities

All these changes in public health problems, practice, and funding require us to reorganize. However, this is also an opportunity for us to become the leaders of change and of our destiny. Through our collective leadership and commitment we will accomplish the following:

• Build an integrated information and knowledge management infrastructure that en-ables us to monitor health, to inform and guide activities, and to improve staff and systems performance.

(7)

• Integrate, innovate, improve, and expand efforts in community and environmental assessments, research, and translation.

• Conduct effective policy and planning that achieves collective impact to improve health and wellness, and health equity for all San Franciscans.

• Lead public health systems efforts to ensure healthy people and healthy places (Fig-ure2).

• Increase administrative, financial and human resources and efficiencies within the division.

• Build a division-wide learning environment and professional development program that supports public health efforts.

Figure 2: SFDPH Population Health Division—Transforming Public Health in San Francisco!

(8)

OUR MISSION

OUR VISION

Drawing upon community wisdom and science, we support, develop, implement evidence-based policies, practices, and partnerships that protect and promote health, prevent disease and injury, and create sustainable environments and resilient communities.

To be a community-centered leader in public health practice and innovation.

P

OPULATION

H

EALTH

D

IVISION

SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC HEALTH

TRANSFORMING PUBLIC HEALTHIN SAN FRANCISCO

A SS UR A NCE G O VE R N A N C E , A D M INIST R A TI O N , A N D SY ST EM S M A N A G EM EN T

4. Assurance of healthy

places and healthy people

GOAL 4: Lead public health systems efforts to ensure healthy people and healthy places

OBJECTIVES:

• 4.1 Establish community-centered approaches that address the social determinants of health and increase

population well-being.

• 4.2 Sustain and improve the infrastructure and capacity to support core public health functions, including

legally mandated public health activities.

5. Sustainable funding and

maximize collective resources

GOAL 5: Increase administrative, financial and human resources efficiencies within the division.

OBJECTIVES:

• 5.1 Establish a centralized business office for the division.

• 5.2 Appropriately address the human resource issues regarding civil service and contract employees. • 5.3 Establish a centralized grants management and development system for the division.

6. Learning organization with a

culture of trust and

innovation.

GOAL 6: Build a division-wide learning environment that supports public health efforts.

OBJECTIVE:

• 6.1 Establish a division-wide Workforce Development program.

A SS ES SME NT / R ES EAR C H

1. Superb knowledge

management systems and

empowered users

GOAL 1 : Build an integrated information and knowledge management infrastructure that enables us to monitor

health, to inform and guide activities, and to improve staff and systems performance. OBJECTIVES:

• 1.1.Build a strong, highly functional information technology (IT) and technical assistance infrastructure in

alignment with Department of Public Health IT strategy.

• 1.2 Establish a highly functional, integrated infectious disease system to collect and report data, and to deliver

and monitor public health actions.

2. Assessment and research

aligned with our vision and

priorities

GOAL 2: Integrate, innovate, improve, and expand efforts in community and environmental assessments,

research, and translation. OBJECTIVES:

• 2.1 Create an action plan that supports division priorities.

• 2.2 Build cross-section interdisciplinary teams to improve health outcomes and programmatic activities.

P O LIC Y D EVE LO P M EN T

3. Policy development with

collective impact

GOAL 3: Conduct effective policy & planning that achieves collective impact to improve health and well-being for

all San Franciscans. OBJECTIVES:

• 3.1 Establish a division-wide Performance Management, Equity & Quality Improvement Program. • 3.2 Establish systems and partnerships to achieve and maintain Public Health Accreditation.

• 3.3 Develop a prioritized legislative agenda and strategic implementation plan to address health status and

inequities. P UB LI C H EA LT H A CCR EDI TA TI O N (P H A) D O M A INS C A TE GO R IE S

(9)

DPH Co

mmunity

Health P

rograms

- MCAH** - COPC - CBHS - HUH

SF General Hosp. Lagunda H

onda Hospital COMMUNITY ORGANIZA TIONS - K aiser P er m., - UCSF / SF SU - SF Planning, DCYF, MT A, etc. DIS ASTERS -Emer gency P repar edness and Medi cal Services HEAL THY PL A CES -Envir onmental Health P rotection, Equity, an d Sustaina bility HEAL THY PEOPLE -Community Health P romotion DISEASES -Disea se P revention and Contr ol High priori ty, inter discipl inary, c ross-branch i nitiati ves, pr ograms, task for ces, team s, pr ojects, etc. STR A TEGIC ALIGN MENT : P ublic He alth A ccr editation, Equity, an d Qual ity Impr ovement OPER A TION S FOCUS: Operations, F inance , and Gra nts Mana gement Examples: HIV/STD P revention, Community He alth Impr ovement Pla n, A frican Ame rican He alth In itiative , etc. High-priority initia tives ma y be led or coor dinated by a PHD B ranch, commu nity partner, or community coa lition. PROFESSIO NAL DEVEL OPMENT : Center for L ear ning a nd Innova tion Population H ealth Divis ion (PHD) **MCA H = Mater

nal, Child & A

dolescent Health;

COPC = Comm. Oriented

P

rimary Car

e;

CBHS = Comm. Behaviorial Health Services; HUH = Housing and Urban Health; DC

YF =

Dept of

Childr

en, Y

outh, & their F

amilies; MT A = Muni. T ransportation Agency; SF SU = SF State University; V ersion 2013.03. 11 KNOWLED GE MANA GEMENT & D ISCO VER Y: AR CHES*, CPHR, and Bri dgeHIV PH A ccr editation Domain Cat egories Assessment Assurance Policy D evelopme nt Gover nance , A dministrati on,

& Systems Manage

ment

* AR

CHES = Applied R

esear

ch, Community Health Epidemiolog

y, and Surveillance; CPHR = Center for

P ublic Health R esear ch

Population H

ealth Division (P

HD) Or

ganization Desig

n

Updated 2

013-03-1

4

(10)

Applied R

esear

ch, Community

Health Epidemiology, & Surveillance

K yle Ber nstein, PhD, ScM P ublic Health A ccr editation,

Equity, and Quality Impr

ovement Israel Nieves-R ivera Envir onmental Health P rotection,

Equity, and Sustainabili

ty R ajiv Bhatia, MD, MPH Community Health P romotion Tracey P ack er, MPH Disease P

revention and Contr

ol

Susan Philip, MD, MPH

Center for L

ear

ning & Innovation

Jonathan F

uchs, MD, MPH

P

ublic Health Emer

gency P repar edness and R esponse Naveena Bobba, MD Department of P ublic Health Barbara A . Gar cia, MP A Dir ector of Health Emer

gency Medical Services John Br

own, MD Center for P ublic Health R esear ch W illi McF arland, MD, PhD, MPH&TM Operations, F inance, and

Grants Management Christine Siador, MPH

Population Health Divi

sion (PHD) Tomás J. Aragón, MD, DrPH Health O ffi cer & Dir ector DPH P

olicy and Planning,

Colleen Chawla, MP A Dir ector ASSESSMENT / R ESEAR CH POLIC Y DEVEL OPMENT ASSUR ANCE Gover nance, A dministration,

and Systems Management

P ublic Health A ccr editat ion Domains BridgeHIV (R esear ch) Susan Buchbinder, MD

Population Health Division (PHD) Or

ganization Chart

(11)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

The New Population Health Division

Transforming Public Health in San Francisco

Tom´as J. Arag´on, MD, DrPH

Health Officer, City & County of San Francisco Director, Population Health and Prevention

and

PHD Organization Design Leadership Team San Francisco Department of Public Health

March 14, 2013

(12)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

Outline—The New Population Health Division

1 Why? The Future of Public Health In San Francisco

2 How? Organization Design Roadmaps

3 What? Organization Design Destination

4 When? Time Line

(13)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

1. San Francisco Department of Public Health, Nov 2012

(14)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

2. Evolution of San Francisco’s “Public Health” Division

(15)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

3. Roadmap to the Future—Public Health “Triple Aim”

Emerging changes in . . .

1 population health challenges, 2 public health services, and 3 health financing,

provides tremendous public health leadership opportunities.

(16)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

4. PHD Organization Design Approach

Stakeholder input

SF Health Commission priorities (e.g., accreditation) Director of Health priorities (Director Garcia)

Focus groups (staff [6] and community [17]) PHP Directors (retreats, Strategic Map) SF Community Health Improvement Planning SF Health Care Services Master Planning Models and Methods

Review organization design models and methods

Consultations with Drs. Naomi Stanford and Glen Mays

(17)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

5. Organization Design Stakeholder General Themes

Lead SFDPH efforts in health protection, health promotion, disease prevention, and disaster preparedness

Be community-centered (“healthy people”)—not pathogen-centric Promote healthy, sustainable environments (“healthy places”) Operationalize division-wide focus on health equity

Become agile, adaptive, and responsive to emerging challenges Strengthen service excellence to communities, clients, and providers Become a learning organization with a culture of trust, innovation, and continuous improvement

Strengthen culture of discovery and world class research Achieve and maintain Public Health Accreditation

(18)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

6. Organization Design Overview

Vision and Mission

DPH Mission: To protect and promote the health of all San Franciscans PHD Vision: To be a community-centered leader in public health practice and innovation

PHD Mission: Drawing upon community wisdom and science, we support, develop, and implement evidence-based policies, practices, and partnerships that protect and promote health, prevent disease and injury, and create sustainable environments and resilient communities.

Organization Design Guiding Principles

Decide and act as one health department and one division Create integrated systems that are community- and client-centered Create integrated systems that maximize our collective resources Engage diverse stakeholders at all phases

Protect and promote health equity

(19)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

7. Organization Design “Open System” Model (Stanford)

(20)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

8. Population Health Division Strategic Map, 2012–2015

(21)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

9. Systems Roadmap for Public Health Accreditation:

The Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence

http://www.nist.gov/Baldrige

(22)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

10. Organization Design—Summary of Changes

John Galbraith in Designing Matrix Organizations that Actually Work

“A company’s organization chart is a display of its intended strategic priorities.”

1 Integrate assessment, surveillance, epidemiology, applied research, and

informatics to support division, DPH, and citywide efforts

2 Integrate disease prevention and control services

3 Integrate specialists in community engagement, planning, and

mobilization to focus on the “Spectrum of Prevention”*

4 Create division-wide infrastructure to support professional development,

quality improvement, grant development, operations and fiscal efficiencies, and public health accreditation

*Influencing policy and legislation; Mobilizing neighborhoods and communities;

Fostering coalitions and networks; Changing organizational practices; Educating providers; Promoting community education; and Strengthening individual knowledge & skills. Source: http://www.preventioninstitute.org

(23)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

11. Population Health Division—Organization Design 1/2

(24)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

12. Population Health Division—Organization Design 2/2

(25)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

13. Population Health Division—Organization Chart

(26)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

14. PHD Organization Design Time Line

The organization design will be accomplished in three phases: Phase I: November 1, 2011–March 19, 2013

Culminates in the release of an initial, high-level structure of the new Population Health Division.

Phase II: March 19, 2013–June 28, 2013

Engage staff across the Division to have open discussions about Division and Branch priorities, and to design Branch structures and work processes.

Phase III: July 1, 2013

The new PHD structure will go into effect on July 1st. Phase III will also involve planning for moving staff to new locations to facilitate more meaningful interactions between staff in the new structure.

(27)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

PHD — Transforming Public Health in SF — Questions?

(28)

Why? Our Future How? Our Roadmaps What? Our Destination When? Time Line

Bibliography

1 Guide to Organisation Design: Creating high-performing and adaptable

enterprises (The Economist), by Naomi Stanford. Permalink: http://amzn. com/1861978022

2 Organization Theory and Design, by Richard L. Daft. Permalink: http://amzn.

com/1111221294

3 Transforming Public Health Practice: Leadership and Management Essentials,

by Bernard J. Healey & Cheryll D. Lesneski. Permalink: http://amzn.com/ 0470508957

4 The Public Health Quality Improvement Handbook, by Ron Bialek, John W.

Moran, Grace L. Duffy, Permalink: http://amzn.com/0873897587

5 Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard, by Chip Health & Dan

Health. Permalink: http://amzn.com/0385528752

6 Public Health Administration: Principles for Population-based Management, by

Lloyd F. Novick, Cynthia B. Morrow, Glen P. Mays. Permalink: http://amzn. com/0763738425

7 Mays GP, Smith SA, Ingram RC, Racster LJ, Lamberth CD, Lovely ES. Public

health delivery systems: Evidence, uncertainty, and emerging research needs. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Mar;36(3):256-65. Review. PubMed PMID: 19215851.

8 Mays GP, Scutchfield FD, Bhandari MW, Smith SA. Understanding the

organization of public health delivery systems: An empirical typology. Milbank Q. 2010 Mar;88(1):81-111. PubMed PMID: 20377759.

References

Related documents

Methods: Due to the need to improve care, knowledge, monitoring, and education regarding asthma, the Children's Asthma Prevention Program (Programa Infantil de Pre- venção de

Principal Component Analysis of Morbidity and Mortality among the United States Homeless Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Albert Nguessan Ngo, PhD 1,2* and

NHP (National Health Policy), Healthcare, SWOT analyses, Primary, Secondary, Tertiary health care centers, Commu- nity health center, District hospital medical colleges.. 1

Similarly, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) provides guidance and research scholarship for nutritional science in clin- ical medicine

In particular, evidence from three ran- domised control trials comparing the risk of HIV infection be- tween circumcised and uncircumcised males in Sub-Sahara Africa suggest that

Aim: Aim of the study was risk assessment of legionellosis for workers in contact with contaminated water aerosol from industrial cooling towers.. Methods: Water samples

According to national policy, fol- lowing the antiretroviral therapy for HIV-positive pregnant women (PW), HIV-exposed infants (HEI) are given antiret- roviral prophylaxis for

Key social and cultural factors of the Time-Pressured Young were time constraints (51.2%), having a long commute (48.8%), peer appearance (43.9%), and adherence to