CIRIA
is
the Construction Industry Research and Information Association.It
isa
non-profit-distributing, private sector organisation carrying out research and providing information forits
members, who include all typesof
organisations concerned with construction, including clients, professional practices, contractors, suppliers, educational and research establishments, professional institutions, trade associations and central and local government.CIRIA focuses on providing best practice guidance to professionals that is authoritative, eonvenicnt to use and relevant. Areas covered include construction practice, building design and materials, management and productivity, ground engineering, water engineering and environmental issues. Through active participation, CIRIA members choose research and information projects of most
value to them. Funding contributions are sought from member subscriptions and from government
and other sources on a project by project basis. Detailed work is contracted to the best qualilied
organisation selected in competition, and each project is guided by a project steering group, which
contains both individual specialists and representatives
of
different groups with experience or interest in the topic.Core Programme Sponsorship. Core Programme members, who include many of the most
significant construction firms, choose the programme of research projects and obtain privileged early access to results.
Construction Industry Envit'onmental Forum. The Environmental Forum (run in partnership with BRE and BSRIA) is a focus for construction and related industries on environmental issues.
Members have free access to a substantial programme of workshops and seminars, monthly informa-
tion bulletins, and publications arising from research undertaken.
Construction Productivity Network (CPN). CPN (a joint venture between CIRIA and BRE),
exists to promote the sharing and application of knovlcdge ott construction productivity issues.
Members have free access to a substantial programme of workshops and seminars, a newsletter, and
an annual conference.
Associates/Aftiliates. Subscribers obtain copies of CIRtA open publications on lavourable terms and get discounts on CIRIA seminars.
Purchase of Publications. CIRIA publications, together with selected publications from other sources, are available by mail order or oil personal application.
Sentinat's/Conferences. CIRIA rims a number of cvents. often related to research projects or
publications.
CIRLA News (quarterly detailed reports on CIRIA's research and inl'ormation activities) and CIRIA
Spectrum (occasional information on issues of wide interest) arc available irce on request.
For further details, please apply to the Business Development Manager, CIRTA,
6
Storey's Gate, Westminster, London SWIP 3AUE-mail switchboardciria.org.uk
Tel: 0171-222 8891 Fax: 0171-222 1708
j
Soil reinforcement
with
geotextiles
R.A.
Jewell
MA
PhD CEngCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND INFORMATION ASSOCIATION
6 Storey's Gate London SW1P SAU E-mail switchboard©ciria.org.uk
CIRIA
and the
authorare
gratefulfor the help
givento
thisproject by the
funders,by the
members
of
the
Steering Group,and
bythe many
individuals who were consulted. The author particularly acknowledgesthe
encouragementhe
received fromthe late
Professor Peter Wrothand the
helpful criticismon the
technical contentof
particular chapters from Dr M.D. Bolton,Mr D.I.
Bush,Dr J-P.
Giroud,Dr
J.H. Greenwood, Professor C.J.F.P. Jones, Professor A. McGown, Dr G.W.E. Milliganand Dr
R.T. Murray.Soil
reinforcement with
geotextilesConstruction
Industry
Researchand
Information Association CIRIA Special Publication 123, 1996Keywords
Geotextiles, soil reinforcement.
Reader Interest
Geotechnical
and
structural engineers, local authorities, public utility engineers.All rights
reserved.No part
of
this
publication maybe
reproducedor
transmittedin
any formor by
anymeans,
including photocopyingand
recording, withoutthe
written permissionof the
copyrightholder,
applicationfor which
shouldbe
addressedto
the publisher. Such written permission must alsobe
obtained beforeany part of
thispublication
is
storedin
a
retrieval systemof
any nature.CLASSIFICATION
AVAILABILITY Unrestricted
©
CIRIA 1996CONTENT Subject area review ISBN
086017425
5Thomas Telford ISBN STATUS Committee guided
0
7277
2502 5USER Structural and
geotechnical engineers
Published by CIRIA,
6 Storey's
Gate, Westminster, London SW1P 3AUand
Thomas TelfordThis report presents
the
results ofa
researchproject
carriedout
for
CIRIAby
DrR
A
Jewell, initiallyof
the
Universityof
Oxfordand
latterlywith
GeoSyntee Consultants of Brussels.Following CIRIA's usual practice,
the
researchwas
guidedby
a
steering groupwhich comprised:
Mr
N A
Trenter (Chairman)Sir
William Halcrowand
PartnersMr R
G V
Green MRM Partnership (nowRust
ConsultingLimited)
Dr
J
H
GreenwoodERA
Technology LimitedLt
ColL
J
Kennedy RARDE (Christchurch) and laterof
RMCS SlirivenhamProfessor A McGown University
of
StrathclydeThe late Mr E B
MacKay Tarmac Construction LimitedMr
G
R
A
Watts Transport Research Laboratory CJRIA's research managerfor this
projectwas Mr
F
M
Jardine.CIRIA gratefully acknowledges these organisations who provided
finding for the
project:
Department
of
the
Environment Ministryof
DefenceScottish Development Agency Transport Research Laboratory
BSP
LimitedDon
andLow
LimitedDu Pont de
Nernours SA Godfreysof
Dundee LimitedIC!
Fibres Geotextile GroupMMG
Civil Engineering SystemsNetlon Limited
Rhone-Poulene (UK) Limited
Contents
List
of
Tables ixList
of
Figures xi1 Engineering with geotextiles
1.1
What are
geotextiles? 21.2 Concepts
for
geotextile applications 31.3 Examples
of
the
useof
geotextiles 61.4 Construction
with
geotextiles 71.5 Geotextile capabilities 8
1.6 Geotextiles
as
separators 91.7 Geotextiles
as soil
reinforcement 101.8 Geotextile compared
with
other solutions 121.9 Synopsis
of
Chapter 1 132
Polymerand
geotextile properties 152.1 Polymer types 15
2.2
Polymer properties 152.2.1
Index
properties 172.2.2
Creep properties 182.3
Strengthand
stiffnessof
geotextiles 182.3.1 Strength properties 19
2.3.2
Stiffness properties 202.3.3
Extrapolationfor
long-term properties 212.3.4 Aged
lifeof
geotextiles 222.4
Measurementof
reference properties 232.5
Damageand
durabilityof
geotextiles 252.5.1 Mechanical damage 25
2.5.2
Chemical and biological durability 262.5.3
Material propertiesin the
ground 292.6
Synopsisof
Chapter2
293
Geotextile products 31 3.1Woven
geotextiles 333.2
Geogrids 35 3.2.1 Geogrid-like products 363.2.2
Geomeshes 363.3
Other
geotextile products 373.3.!
Non-woven geotextiles 373.3.2 Knitted geotextiles 38
3.3.3 Sheathed materials 38
3.4
Comparing reinforcement materials 383.4.1 Example cases 39
3.4.2
Data on
specific strengthand
stiffness 393.4.3 Properties
for
woven geotextiles40
3.4.4 Properties
for
geogrid reinforcement 413.5
Synopsisof
Chapter 342
4
Reinforced soil behaviour 434.!
How reinforcement strengthens soil 434.2
Reinforcement orientation and stiffness 454.3
Strain compatibility 464.4
Interaction between soiland
reinforcement 484.5
Coefficientof direct
sliding 504.6 Coefficient
of
bond 504.7
Example interaction coefficients 544.7.! Woven
geotextile 544.7.2 Geogrid 55
4.8 Synopsis
of
Chapter4
565
Soil strengthand
bearing capacity 595.!
Anglesof
friction 595.1.!
Peak shearing resistance 605.2 Strength
of
compact soils 615.2.1 Basic concepts 61
5.2.2 Granular soils 63
5.2.3 Testing granular soils 68
5.2.4
Compactclay
soils 715.2.5 Testing
clay
soils 735.3 Soft
clay
foundations 745.3.1 Consolidation history 74
5.3.2 Lower
limitto
undrained shear strength 765.3.3 Expected undrained shear strength 76
5.3.4
Testing softclay
foundations 775.4
Drained bearing capacity 795.4.1 Influence
of
inclined loading 80Contents
5.5 Undrained bearing capacity 82
5.5.1 Influence
of
inclined loading 835.6
Synopsisof
Chapter 5 836
Design values and safety margins 876.1 Basis
of
calculations 876.1.1 Design situations 87
6.1.2
Design valuesof
parameters 886.1.3
Required and available forces 886.2 Loadings 89
6.2.1 Self-weight loading 89
6.2.2
Surcharge loading 896.2.3
Water
pressures 896.3 Soil properties 90
6.3.1 Representative values
of
soil strength 906.3.2 Design values
of
soil strength 906.3.3 Drained analysis 90
6.3.4
Undrained analysis 916.4
Reinforcement properties 916.4.1 Reinforcement properties
for
serviceability 936.5 Interaction properties 94
6.6
Summaryof
design values 946.7 Synopsis
of
Chapter6
947
Limit
states 977.1 Design equilibrium 97
7.2
Ultimate limit states: design situations 987.2.1 Internal
and
overall equilibrium99
7.2.2 External equilibrium 100
7.2.3 Construction over soft soil 100
7.3
Serviceabilitylimit
states 1017.3.1 Bounds
to likely
deflection 1017.4 Synopsis
of
Chapter 7 1038
Steep reinforced slopes 1058.1 Internal equilibrium: idealised case 105
8.1.1 Idealised equilibrium 107
8.1.2 Analysis
for
required stress 1088.1.3 Limit equilibrium analysis 109
8.2.1 Allowance
for
bond 1118.2.2 Allowance
for
load-shedding 1128.3 Internal equilibrium: practical corrections 113
8.3.1 Allowance
for
bond 1138.3.2 Allowance
for
compaction stresses 1148.4
External equilibrium 1158.4.1 Direct sliding 115
8.4.2
Bearing capacity 1168.4.3
External stability 1168.5 Design charts
for
steep reinforced slopes 1168.6 Steps
for using the
design charts 1178.7 Design example 120
8.7.1 Project
data and
design values 1208.7.2 Design steps 122
8.8 General methods
of
stability analysis 1248.8.1 Comment
on the
methodof
slices 1258.9
Synopsisof
Chapter 8 1279
Reinforcementof
shallowslips
in
clay
embankments 1319.1 Factors causing instability 132
9.1.1 Porewater pressures 133
9.1.2
Shearing resistanceat
low
effective stress 1339.2
Analysis for
shallow slips 1349.2.1 Assumed porewater pressure 134
9.2.2 Slip surface geometry 135
9.3 Results
for
shallow slips 1369.3.1 Unreinforced case 136
9.3.2
Reinforcedcase:
slip repair 1379.4
Design chartsfor
side-slope reinforcement 1399.4.1 Contrast with steep slopes 140
9.5
Selectionof
reinforcement 14!9.5.1 Reinforcement types and materials 141
9.5.2 Reinforcement layout 141 9.5.3 Reinforcement bond 142 9.6 Construction expedients 143 9.7 Design example 143 9.8 Synopsis
of
Chapter 9 144 10 Retaining walls 147Contents
10.2 Internal equilibrium: idealised case 150
10.3 Overall equilibrium 151
10.3.1 Overall failure mechanisms 151
10.3.2 Allowance
for bond and
load-shedding 15210.3.3 Equations
for
overall equilibrium 15410.3.4
Line
of
thrust in the
reinforced zone 15510.3.5 Minimum
required
lengthfor
overall equilibrium 157 10.4 Internal equilibrium: practical corrections 15810.5 External equilibrium 160 10.5.1 Direct sliding 160 10.5.2 Excessive eccentricity 162 10.5.3 Bearing capacity 162 10.5.4 External stability 163 10.6 Deformation
of
walls 16410.6.1 Deformation
of
the
reinforced fill 16410.6.2 Deformation caused
by
foundation movement 16610.7
Practical
aspects influencing design 16710.7.1
Thrust
fromthe
backfill 16710.7.2 Connections 168
10.7.3 Full-height facing 169
10.8 Design example for
a
retaining wall 17010.8.1
Data and
design values 17010.8.2 Design
steps
(ultimatelimit
state) 17210.8.3 Check
on
serviceability 17610.8.4 Design cross-section 178
10.9 Point loads 178
10.9.1 Internal equilibrium 179
10.9.2 Allowance
for
bond 18110.9.3 Overall
and
foundation equilibrium 18210.10 Sloping fill 183
10.11
'Loop-anchor'
walls 18410.12 Synopsis
of
Chapter 10 18511 Embankments
on
soft soil 18911.1 Stress
and
force equilibrium 19011.1.1 Summary
of
mechanics 19211.2 Slip mechanisms and deformation 193
11.2.1 Internal stability 194
11.2.2 Overall stability 196
11.3.1 Construction period 201
11.3.2 Drained
and
undrained shear 20211.3.3 Design strategies 204
11.3.4 Significance
of
foundation stability 20411.4 Concepts from plasticity analysis 204
I
I .4. 1 Plasticity solutions 20511.4.2 Application
of
plastic theory 20611.5
Limit
equilibrium analysis 20711.5.1 General considerations 208
11.5.2 Rotational stability: slip circle analysis 208
11.5.3 Foundation and overall stability 210
11.5.4 Limitations
of
slip circle analysis 211 11.5.5 Translational stability:wedge
analysis 21211.5.6 Methods
of
slices 21311.6 Analytical solutions 214
11.6.1 Foundation
of
uniform strengthand
limited depth 215 11.6.2 Foundationwith
strength increasing with depth 21611.6.3 Reinforcement stiffness 217
11.7 Parameters for design 218
11.7.1 Limit states 218
11.7.2 Ultimate limit sales 219
11.7.3 Analysis
for
serviceability 22311.7.4 Reinforcement mattress design 225
11.8 Design example 226
11.8.1 Embankment details 226
11.8.2 Ultimate limit state 227
11.8.3 Serviceability limit state 230
11.8.4 Conclusions
for the design
example 23211.9 Case histories 233
11.10 Synopsis
of
Chapter 11 23312 Working platforms and unpaved roads 235
12.1 Mechanics
of
reinforcement action 23612.2 Analysis
for
working platforms 23912.2.1 Subgrade bearing capacity 239
12.2.2 Stresses within
the
fill 24012.2.3 Unreinforced design 241
12.2.4 Reinforced design 242
12.2.5
Fill
bearing capacity 243Contents
12.2.7 Serviceability
for
a
known applied loading 24612.3 Procedure
for
working platform design 24612.3.1 Ultimate
limit
state analysis 24712.3.2 Serviceability
limit
state analysis 24812.4 Design example: working platform 248
12.4.1 Stability 248
12.4.2 Serviceability 251
12.4.3 Reinforcement properties 251
12.4.4 Comparative designs 252
12.5
Static
analysisfor
unpaved roads 25312.5.1 Subgrade bearing capacity 253
12.5.2 Stresses within
the
fill 25412.5.3 Unreinforced design 255
12.5.4 Reinforced design 255
12.5.5
Fill
bearing capacity 25712.5.6 Serviceability 258
12.5.7 Design charts 258
12.6 Design example: static wheel loading 260
12.7 Allowance
for
traffic 26312.7.1 Definition
of
failure 26512.7.2 Rate effects 266
12.7.3 Fatigue relation 268
12.7.4 Permanent
road
thickness 26812.7.5 Practical wheel loading 269
12.7.6 Allowance
for
mixed traffic 27012.8 Procedure
for
unpavedroad
design 27112.8.! Unreinforced design 271
12.8.2 Reinforced design 273
12.9 Comparisons
and
back-analysis 27512.9.1 Unreinforced unpaved road design (l-lammitt, 1970) 276 12.9.2 Reinforced unpaved road design (Giroud
and
Noiray, 1981) 280 12.9.3 Back-analysis reinforced trafficking trials 28212.10 Discussion 287
12.11 Synopsis
of
Chapter 12 28813 From
design to
specification 29113.1 Future developments 291
13.2 Designing reinforced soil structures 292
13.2.1 Concept 292
13.2.3 Timing
and
structural life 29413.2.4 Foundation
and
fill materials 29613.2.5 Facings
and
slope protection 29613.3 Construction specification and
quality
assurance 29713.3.1 Reinforcement materials 297
13.3.2
Site
preparation and construction control 29713.4 Topics
of
special concern 29813.4.1 Limit state design 298
13.4.2 Geotechnical properties 299 13.4.3 Geotextile properties 300 13.4.4 Environmental considerations 300 13.4.5 Interaction properties 300 13.4.6 Combined applications 300 13.4.7 Unpaved roads 302 13.5 Concluding remarks 302 13.6 Synopsis
of
Chapter 13 303 References 305 Index 317List
of
Tables
2.1 Factors
to
allowfor
mechanical damagefor
some geogrid reinforcementsmade from drawn HDPE 27
2.2
Factorsto
allowfor
mechanical damagefor
some woven geotextiles andgeogrids
made
from polyester 273.1 Typical reference properties
for
yarnat
20°C and
65% relative humidity 40 3.2 Geometric componentof
extension causedby
the weave in wovengeotextiles
40
3.3 Comparison
of
index strengthof
three
woven geotextilesof
weight lOOg/m2in the
longitudinal directionand
20g1m2in the
transverse direction 41 3.4 Comparisonof
index elongationof
three woven geotextilesof
weight 100Wm2
in the
longitudinal directionand 20
gIm2in the
transverse direction 41 3.5 Typical geogrid reference propertiesof
20°C
and 65% relative humidity 42 4.1 Bearing stressratio for
soil reinforcement 524.2 Bond
coefficientsfor grid
reinforcement 535.1 Typical peak angles
of
frictionfor
compactedgranular fills in
routineapplications 66
5.2
Peak strength and relative density index corresponding with FS=
1.3 685.3 Bearing
capacity
factors 816.1 Material factors
(f,)
as
a
functionof
the
required extrapolationof
data
at
thedesign temperature (Td) 93
6.2
Summaryof
design
valuesand
partial factors forthe
main parameters inultimate limit
state
calculations (drained analysis) 95 8.1 Characteristic strengthof
the
reinforcement gridsin
kN/m 1228.2 Comparison
of
costs for
reinforcement layouts 1259.1 Gross required reinforcement force (kN/m slope)
to
provide
a
factor of
safetyFS
=
1.2and
1.3 1389.2 Required reinforcement length
to
providea
factor
of
safety FS=
1.2 and1.3 138
10.1 Characteristic strengths
for the
reinforcementgrids in
kN/m 17110.2 Characteristic stiffnesses
of
the
reinforcementgrids in
kN/m 172 10.3 Available stress from reinforcement, 0AVin
kN/m2,and in the
maximumpermissible depth for
each
reinforcement belowthe crest,
7maxin
m 17310.4 Summary
of
displacement calculationsfor the
design example 177 11.1 Equations from simplified analysisfor an
embankment ona
foundationof
11.2 Recommended soil properties
for
ultimate limit state analysis 220 11.3 Recommended reinforcement propertiesfor
ultimatelimit
state analysis 22111.4
Two
available woven polyester geotextiles 22711.5 Ultimate limit state results
to
achieveFS
=
1.3on
theclay
strength 228 11.6 Ultimate limit state resultsto
achieve FSç=
1.1on the clay
strength 2281.7 Serviceability limit
state
to
achieveFS
=
1.1 231 2.1Ratio of
load-carrying capacity for reinforcedand
unreinforced designs (two-dimensional loading case) 252
12.2 Variation
of
bearing capacity factor with outward shear stress forplane
strain(2D) and
axi-symmetric (3D) loading 25412.3 Limiting bearing stress
for
a
circular
load,R
=
0.17m 263 12.4 Trafficking trialson
a
crushed stonefill
over clay subgrade, reinforcedby
aList
of
Figures
Figure 1.1 Geotextile functions:
(a)
separation and(h)
reinforcementFigure 1.2 Illustration
of
reinforcementaction in direct shear: (a) tensile and
compressivestrains in
soil,and
(h)resultant
reinforcementforces
Figure 1.3 Reinforcement supporting
load by
membrane action:(a) rutted
unpaved
road, (b) abovea
sinkholeand
(c)in
a
piled
embankmentfoundation
Figure 1.4 Combined
use
of
reinforcementto
st(ffrnthe
foundation beneatha
reinforcedsoil
wallFigure 1.5
Local
tensile crackingat
the base
of
a
loaded granular layer: (a)
unreinforced
case,
and
(b) reinforced case 7 Figure 1.6 Example applicationsof
geotextile separators 9 Figure 1.7 Example applicationsof
geotextilesas
soil
reinforcement 10Figure 1.8 Variation
of
required
reinforcementforce
with time:(a) steep
slopesand
walls,(b)
embankmentson
soft soil,and
(c)
unpaved roads 11Figure 2.1 DWerent types
of
creep behaviourin materials:
(a)
in
a
metalat
high temperature,and
(b)in
a
polymer
at
ambient
temperature 17Figure
2.2
Sustained-loadcreep
tests ona
polyester
geotextile 18Figure 2.3 Sustained-load
creep
testscausing failure in
a
polyester
yarn 19 Figure2.4
Yieldand
rupture points:
(a)
at
a
constant
rate of
elongation,and
(h)under sustained
load 19Figure 2.5 Strength
properties
for
a
uniaxial
polyethylene geogrid 20 Figure 2.6 Load-elongation relationsfound from
creeptest data
21 Figure 2.7 Timeto
chemical breakdownas
a
function
of
temperaturefor
aspunbonded polypropylene geotextile 23
Figure 2.8 Typical load-elongation response
from
index tests:(a) linear
behaviourand
(b) non-linear
behaviour 24Figure
2.9
Creep-ruptureproperties
for
a
geotextile material 25 Figure2.10 Idealisation
of
mechanical damage reducing strength bya
constant
factor
irrespectiveof
time 26Figure 2.11 Progressive influence with time
of
the soil
environment on strength 28 Figure 3.1 Requirementsfor
reinforcement:(a)
axial load-carryingcapacity
and,for
geogrids,(b)
an
adequate
transverse memberarrangement
31 Figure 3.2 Significant reinforcementin
twoperpendicular
directionsis
bestFigure 3.3 Reinforcement
of
embankmentson
softsoil: (a)
temporaryforce
in
the direction offihling,(b) jointed
layersof
reinforcementand
(c)
a
cellular mattressFigure
3.4 Geometric componentsof
deformationcaused by
straightening of load-carrying
elementsin
a
woven geotextileFigure 3.5 Uniaxial
geogrid
reinforcementformed
bya
patented
processof
punching holesin
a
sheet followed by
drawing 35Figure
3.6 Geogrid-likeproducts: (a)
connectedsheathed strips
and
(b) inter- wovenbundled yarns
witha
protective coating 36 Figure 3.7 Counter-rotatingdie
for
manufacturing geomesh materials 37 Figure 4.1 Effectsof
reinforcementon
equilibrium:(a)
unreinforced slopeand
(b)allowing
for
the
reinforcement force 44Figure 4.2 Improvement
in
shearingresistance as
a
function
of
the
reinforcementorientation 45
Figure 4.3 Optimum directions
for
reinforcementin
soil: (a)
to
maximise bond,and
(b)
to
maximise tensilestrain
45Figure
4.4
Relationsfor
strain
compatibility:(a)
mohilisedsoil shearing re-
sistance,and
(b)
mobilised reinforcement force 47 Figure 4.5The
compatibility curvefor
determiningthe
equilibriumin
reinforcedsoil 47
Figure 4.6
Interactions
betweensoil
and
reinforcement 48 Figure4.7
Definitionof
dimensionsfor
reinforcement 49 Figure4.8
Bond between reinforcementand
soil:
(a)
mechanismsand
(b)definitions
for
analysisFigure
4.9
Bearingstresses
on reinforcement 54Figure 4.10
Influenceof
particle
sizeon soil bearing
stress 55 Figure5.!
Equilibrium stresses infrictional
soil 60 Figure 5.2 Relation between Kc,and
peak angle
of
friction
for
normallyconsolidated
granular
soilsFigure
5.3 Trendof
increasingpeak frictional
resistance with distancefrom
thecritical state
line:(a) critical state
line,and
peak
strength versus(b) initial
specific volume,and
(c) initial
overcompression 62 Figure 5.4 Approximationsto
a
curved strength envelope 63 Figure 5.5 Variation ofpeak angle
of
friction
withmean
stressin granular
soil 64Figure
5.6 Triaxial strengthdata
for
sands collected by Bolton (1986) 65 Figure 5.7Peak angle
of
friction
for
sand in triaxial
compression 67 Figure 5.8 Definitionsfor
the direct shear
test 69 Figure 5.9 Typical results froma
direct shear test on
compactgranular
soil 70List
of
FiguresFigure
5.10
Normalisedpeak
strengthdata from triaxial
compression tests onLondon clay 72
Figure
5.11Peak angle
of
friction
for
Londonclay (data from Figure
5.10) 72Figure 5.12 Residual angle
of
friction
versusgranular
specific volume 74Figure 5.13
Twocauses
of
overconsolidationin
a soft clay foundation (a) reductionin
ground leveland
(b) previous loweringof
groundwater 75 Figure5.14
Valuesof
the shear strength ratio s0/o,
for
normally consolidatedclays 76
Figure 5.15 Example
of
a
foundation
overconsolidatedby
previously lowered groundwater (a) effective vertical stresses, (b) overconsolidationratio
and
(c) undrained shear
strength 77Figure
5.16
Interpretationof
the relation
betweenshearing
resistanceand
vane correctionfactor
Rfor
normally consolidated clays 78 Figure 5.17 Relation betweenundrained shearing
resistanceand
plasticity
indexfrom the
back-analysisof
embankmentfailures
78 Figure 5.18 Definitionsfor
the drained analysis
of
bearing
capacity 79Figure
5.19 Reductionin
bearing capacitydue
to
load
inclination 81Figure 5.20 Drained bearing capacity under
combined loading 82Figure
5.21 Definitionsfor
the analysis
of
undrained bearing
capacity 83Figure 5.22
Undrainedbearing capacity under
combined loading 84Figure
6.1 Reinforcement strength properties 92Figure
7.1 Equilibriumin
a
steep
reinforcedslope
expressedin
termsof
requiredand available stresses 97
Figure
7.2
Equilibrium (foundation stability)for
an
embankmenton
soft soilexpressed
in
termsof
required
and
available
forces 98 Figure 7.3Internal
equilibriumfor a
steep
reinforced slope 99 Figure7.4 Overall
equilibriumfor a
steep
slopeand
wall 99 Figure 7.5External
equilibrium checkon
foundation capacity:(a) direct
sliding,(b)
bearing capacity,and
(c)
eccentricity 100 Figure7.6 External
equilibrium check on deep-seatedfailure
mechanisms 100 Figure 7.7 Limitsto the
expected equilibrium shownon
a
compatibility curve: (a)soil
behaviour, (b) reinforcement behaviour, and(c) the
expectedequilibrium 102
Figure 8.1 Three types
of
reinforced slope 105Figure 8.2 Steep slope definitions 106
Figure 8.3 Three zones
in
a
steep reinforced slope: zoneI,
bounded by
AB, zone2,
to end
of
reinforcement,and
zone3, the
unreinforced backfill 106Figure 8.4
Idealised
equilibrium with uniform reinforcementforce in
zoneI
decreasing
to zeroat
the backof
zone 2 107Figure 8.5 Maximum
required stress
in thesoil
exceeded everywhere by theavailable
stress from reinforcementarranged
at
two spacings 107Figure 8.6 Stress characteristics illustrating
balanced
equilibriumin
zone/
108 Figure 8.7(a)
Two-part wedge mechanismand
(h) boundaryforces
109 Figure 8.8(a)
Logarithmicspiral
mechanismand (h)
boundaryforces
109 Figure 8.9 Overall equilibrium check onthe required
reinforcement length 110 Figure8.10
Maximum available reinforcementforce,
R'
tomaintain
overallequilibrium
Figure 8.11 Required
bond
lengthand
loss
of
available forceFigure
8.12
Additional reinfoirement. Kd> KReq.to
mitigateloss
of
available
forcedue
to
bondFigure
8.13
Additional reinforcement.0mj'
toallow
for
bond near the crest
of
a
steep
slope 113Figure
8.14
Two-part wedgeanalysis
for
direct
sliding 115Figure
8.15
Choiceof
pore-pressureratio to
allowfor a
phreatic
surface 117Figure
8.16 (a)
Envelopeof
maximumrequired
stress,and
(h) locusof
maximumavailable
stressin
a
steep reinforced slope 118 Figure 8.17 Envelopeof
maximumrequired
stressfor
the
design example 123Figure 8.18 Provision
of
available stressfor
the
design example 124Figure
8.19 Cross-sectionfor
the
design example usingall
three
reinforcementgrids
125Figure 8.20 Illustration
of
the
methodof
slices applied to
reinforced soil 126 Figure 8.21 Designchart
I
for
steep
reinforced slopes,r
=
0 127 Figure 8.22 Designchart
2 for
steep
reinforced slopes, r11=
015 128Figure 8.23 Design
chart
3for
steep
reinforced slopes, r11=
0.50 129Figure 9.1 Shallow slope
failures in clay
slopes:(a)
slip
sutface, (b) near-surfaceporewater
pressures,and
(c)
reducedshearing resistance
at
loweffective stress 131
Figure 9.2
Measured shearing resistance
for
LondonClay
at
low effective stress 134 Figure 9.3(a)
Maximumporewater pressure
distributionin clay
embankmentside-slopes
and
(b)the
idealisationfor
analysis 135Figure
9.4
Slip mechanismfor
analysis 135Figure 9.5 Variation
of
the
mobilisedfriction angle
with depthto
maintainequilibrium
in
a
clay
side-slope 136Figure
9.6
Requiredshearing
resistancefor
equilihirium compared withthe peak
and
critical state shearing
resistanceof
London Clay 137Figure 9.7
Gross required
reinforcementforce
for
combinationsof
slope heightList
of
FiguresFigure 9.8 Required reinforcement length
for
combinationsof
slopeheight
and
design
angle
of
friction
140Figure
9.9 Typical reinforcementarrangement in
a
clay
embankment side-slope 14!Figure 9.10
Envelopesof
required
and
availableforce
in
reinforcement layersfor
a
1:2
side-slope 142Figure
9.11 Reinforcement layoutfor
the
design example 144 Figure 10.1 Two examplesof
reinforcedsoil wall
systems 147Figure 10.2 Definitions
for
reinforcedsoil
walls 148Figure 10.3 Summary
of
steps in the
design of reinforcedsoil
walls 149 Figure 10.4 Analysisof
internal
equilibriumin
a
reinforcedsoil
wall 150 Figure 10.5 Distributionof
availablestress
for
balanced internal
equilihi-ium 151Figure 10.6 Analysis
for
overall
equilibriumin
a
reinforcedsoil
wall 152 Figure 10.7 Maximum availableforce in
a
reinforcement layerI
52 Figure 10.8Forces acting on the
reinforced zonefor
overall
equilibrium 153 Figure 10.9 Eccentricityof
the
resultantforce
onthe
t,ial
wedge0G.
at
an
angleO 155
Figure 10.10 Results
to
illustrate the line
of
thrust in
a
reinforcedsoil
wall. (casewith
td
=
35°and
no
surcharge) I 56Figure 10.11 Minimum reinforcement length
for balanced
equilibrium(case:
4bd=
trd'Yb=
Yr. level backfill,and A1
=
I/Ab) 158Figure
10.12 Minimum reinforcement lengthfor
balanced
equilibrium(case:
thd
=
trd
5°, Yb=
Yr. level backfill,and
A1
=
//Ab) 159Figure
10.13Direct
slidingat
foundation level I 60 Figure 10.14 Possibledirect
sliding mechanisms when LdS>
L 161Figure 10.15 Equivalent
foundation
for
the analysis
of
bearing
capacity 162 Figure 10.16 Checkon foundation
stability:(a)
bearing capacity analysis,and
(h)analysis
of
external slip
mechanisms 164Figure 10.17
Chart
for
maximum horizontal movementin
reinforcedsoil
walls 165Figure 10.18 Resultant wall displacements following consolidation 167
Figure 10.19 Connections
at
theface
168Figure 10.20
Forces
transmitted throughfull-hei ght facing
169 Figure 10.21 Design example:wall details
and
required
stressesfor
internalequilibrium 173
Figure
10.22 Design example:trial
reinforcementlayout to provide the
required stresses(a) one
reinforcementmaterial
(h) useof
stronger
grid at
base 174
Figure
10.23 Design example:final
cross-section 178 Figure 10.24inclined load on
a
reinforcedsoil
wall 179 Figure 10.25 Additionalrequired stress
dueto
a
horizontalpoint load
180Figure 10.26 Additional required stress due
to
a
verticalpoint load
180Figure
10.27Required stress
for
internal
equilibrium withpoint
loading 181Figure 10.28 Wedge analysis
to
checkinternal
equilibrium 182Figure
10.29 Wall with slopingfill
183Figure 10.30 Active
earth pressure
coefficientsfor
slopingfills
184 Figure 10.31 Approximationfor
backfill stressesdue
to
a
broken slope 185Figure 10.32
Details
for
loop-anchor walls 186Figure 11.1 Reinforcement improving stability
during
constructionand
founda-tion
consolidation 189Figure 11.2 Disturbing
forces in
an
unreinforced embankment, with reinforcementsupporting
outward shear
stress 190Figure 11.3 The influence
of
outward shear stress on bearing
capacity 191Figure 11.4 Reinforcement providing
lateral restraint
onthe foundation
surface 192 Figure 11.5 improvementin
bearingcapacity due
to
lateral restraint on
thefoundation suiface 193
Figure 11.6 Summary
of
mechanicsin
a
reinforced embankmenton
soft soil 194 Figure 11.7internal
stability:direct
slidingfailure in the fill
195Figure
11.8 Overall stability: slippageacross the foundation
surface 196Figure
11.9 Foundationstability: (a) applied
stresses,(b)
and
(c)shear
on horizontalplanes,
and
(d) resultingshear
displacement,for
the
casec=O
197Figure 11.10
Overall stability:
envisagedrigid
bodyfailure
mechanism 199 Figure 11.11Foundation
stability: limiting embankment cross-sectionsand
pre-failure' lateral
deflectionsin the foundation
for
the
cases,=
+1,0,—!
200Figure 11.12 Relation between
the
maximumrequired
reinforcementforce
and
therate
of
construction 201Figure 11.13 The response
of
soft clay to rapid stage
2
loading beneath anembankment 203
Figure 11.14 Beat-ing
capacity
expressedin
termsof
the
allowable vertical loading versus distancefrom the
edgeof loading, relevant
to
embankment design 205
Figure 11.15 Plasticity solutions
for
strength increasing with depth 206 Figure 11.16 Solutionsfor a
foundation
of
uniform strengthand
limited depthabove
a
rough stratum 206Figure 11.17
Practical
embankment cross-sections derivedfrom plasticity
solu-tions 207
List
of
FiguresFigure 11.19 Slip circle
analysis
for
reinforced embankments:(a)
foundation stability, with (b)available
and
(c) required forces; (d)
overallstability,
required forces
210Figure
11.20 Comparisonof
slipcircle
analysis withplasticity
solutions: (a) strengthincreasing
with depth,and
(b)foundation
of
limited depth 212 Figure 11.21 Wedgeanalysis
for
reinforced embankments:(a)
exploded viewof
limiting stresses,
(b)
checkon foundation
stability,and
(c) check onoverall
stability 213Figure 11.22 Assumed equilibrium
for
analytical solutions:(a)
foundationof
limited depth,
and
(b) foundation
with strength increasing withdepth 214
Figure 11.23 Influence
of
reinforcement stiffnesson the
maximum valuesof
embankment displacementand
reinforcement elongation 224 Figure 11.24 Possible embankment cross-sectionsfbr
the
design example 228 Figure 12.1 Typicalarrangement
for
an
unpavedroad
235 Figure 12.2 General definitionsfor
the
two-dimensional loading ona
workingplatform 236
Figure 12.3 Combined loading
on the
subgradein the
unreinJbrcedcase
237 Figure 12.4 Actionof
the
reinforcementto
relieve subgradeof
outward
shearstress 238
Figure 12.5 Envelope
of
availablesubgrade resistance
(ABCE)and
the
stressapplied
bysuiface load
(GCH) 239Figure
12.6 Elemental blockof
fill
beneath the surface pressure
240Figure
12.7 Horizontalforces
consideredin the
equilibrium analysis 241 Figure 12.8 Outwardshear
stresssupported by the
reinforcement 242Figure
12.9 Interactiondiagram
showingthe
unreinforcedand
fully
reinforcedequilibrium 243
Figure
12.10 Limit imposedby the bearing capacity
of
the
fill
(N
=
pyB/sB') 244 Figure 12.11 Limit imposedby the
allowable reinforcementforce
(aji
=
taijB') 245 Figure 12.12 Requiredand
availablestresses
for
workingplatform
example 249 Figure 12.13 Designchart
for
working platform example 250 Figure 12.14 General definitionsfor
the
three-dimensional loadingon
an
unpavedroad 253
Figure 12.15
Shear
loadingunder axi
-symmetric conditions:(a) shear
stresses,(b)force
in
the
reinforcement,and
(c) average biaxial
conditions 256 Figure 12.16 Designchart
for
unreinforcedand
reinforced
stabilityunder
axi-symmetric
loading: (a) required
fill
thickness,and
(b) requiredFigure 12.17 Design
charts
for
(s,IyR=
10)illustrating the
influenceof
load-spread angle: (a)
and
(b) withI
=
25',
(c)
and (d) withI
=
45°
261 Figure 12.18 Designcharts
for
([3= 35°)
illustratingthe
influenceof
the
fill:
(a)
and
(b) with sn/yR=
5, (c) and (d)
with s0/1R=
20 262Figure
12.19 Comparison betweenstatic
and
repeated-loadtests on
unreinforcedunpaved roads 264
Figure 12.20 Definition
of
failure in an
unpavedroad under static
and
repeatedloading 265
Figure 12.21
Failure in
unreinforcedand
reinforcedunpaved roads subject
totraffic 266
Figure 12.22 Vane correction
factors to
allowfor
the
influenceof
strain rate
onundrained shear
strength 267Figure 12.23
Derivation
of
road capacity after
N
load
repetitionsin
termsof
an
equivalent
static load
272Figure
12.24 Designchart
for
unreinforced unpavedroads; applicable to
specificvalues, se/yR,
and,
[3 273Figure
12.25Master
designchart
for
reinforced unpaved roads 274 Figure 12.26 Determinationof
the required
reinforcementforce
allowingfor
traffic 275
Figure 12.27
Correlation
for
unreinforced unpavedroads proposed by
Hammitt(1970) 276
Figure 12.28
Fit to
the
data
achievedby the
equationproposed
by Hammitt(1970) 277
Figure 12.29 The
data
of
Hammitt (1970)plotted as
an
equivalent staticload
278 Figure 12.30 Comparison betweenthe new
analysis,the
relationproposed
byHammitt (1970)
and
the
data
for
unreinforced unpavedroads
279 Figure 12.31 Comparison ofthe
newanalysis
with Giroudand
Noiray (1981). 281 Figure 12.32 Resultsfor
the
hack-analysisof
the
unreinforcedunpaved road
testedby Webster
and
Watkins (1977) 285Figure 12.33 Illustration
of
the increasing
equivalentload
dueto
fatigue
and
the limiting capacity caused by insufficient reinforcement modulus 287 Figure 13.1 Possible effect of sequenceof
operationsat
a
soft-clay site: (a)proposed light bridge formed on
H-piles,(b)
fill
placement
deformspre-installed piles,
(c)piles installed alter
constructionof
approachembankment 294
Figure
13.2 Possible effects of sequenceof
operations when installinga
culvert througha
basally
reinforced embankmenton soft
clay 295Notation
ab fraction
of grid
width availablefor
bearingfraction
of
reinforcementplan area
thatis
solidbond
allowanceA1 load-shedding
(or
sharing) allowanceB width
of
a
transverse memberof
a
grid taking bearingB
effective widthof
loaded area effective cohesion/3 depth
of
footing
below ground level mean particle sizeDmax maximum particle size
e load eccentricity
on
a
footinge eccentricity
of
foundation reaction from centreof
reinforced blocke void ratio
efield
field
voidratio
of
compacted fill Cmax voidratio
at
loosest condition Cmin voidratio
at
densest conditionfd partial factor
for
mechanical damagefenv partial factor
for
chemicaland
biological environment fm overall material factorF1 scale-effect factor
for
bearing stress ratio F2 shape-effect factorfor
bearing stress ratioFS
factor
of
safetyFSa
factor
of
safetyin
a
'lumped-factor' design G, specific gravitydepth
where
critical wedge intersects width face heightof
phreatic surface above baseof
a
slopeH
slope(or
wall) heightH' effective slope
(or
wall) height (allowingfor
vertical surcharge)angle
of
backfill abovea
slope crestreduction
factor
for
bearing capacityunder
inclined loadingi,, reduction factor
for
bearing capacityunder
inclined loadingrelative density
l,
plasticity indexrelative
density
indexreference stiffness
at
end
of
construction Jd reference stiffnessat
end
of
design
lifespecific stiffness
of
a
polymerk empirical
constant in relation between
relative densityand angle of
friction
K0 coefficient
of
earth
pressureat
restKar active earth pressure coefficient corresponding
to design
angleof
friction for reinforced fillKab active earth
pressure
coefficient correspondingto
design angleof
frictionfor
backfillKad
design
activeearth
pressure coefficientKd design value
of
earth
pressure coefficientKReq required
value
of
earth
pressure coefficientL
width
of
footingor
blockof
reinforced soilL
effective width
of
footingfor
inclined loadingbond
lengthbond
lengthfor
reinforcementlayer
at
baseof
wall required reinforced lengthto
preventdirect
sliding Lr LR lengthof
reinforcementlength
of
inclined trial wedgein power
to
which OCR is raisedin relating
(s/o')
for
normally andoverconsolidated states
n slope definition
in
1 verticalto n
horizontal bearing capacity factorNq bearing capacity factor
bearing capacity factor OCR overconsolidation ratio
equivalent effective pressure with respect
to
normal consolidation lineP
tensile loadin
reinforcementAv
availableforce
allowingfor
bond AvaiIable available reinforcement forcegross reinforcement force
"hase modified reinforcement
force
at
baseof
wallbf
thrust
from backfill on reinforced blockdesign
strengthof
reinforcement"darn reinforcement strength allowing
for
mechanical damageenv
reinforcement strength allowingfor
chemicaland
biological environmentPro
reinforcement forceat
equilibriumlateral
thrust from the
fillNotation
(fieId)td,Td strength
of
reinforcementin the field
at
design life, td,and
design temperature, Tdmobilised
force in
reinforcement effective normal forcetensile
forcein
reinforcementgross maximum
force
requiredfor
equilibrium gross available forceref
reference strengthof
reinforcement(fXd.
Td reference strengthof
reinforcementat
design
time, tdand
temperature, Td"Req required tensile reinforcement force required required reinforcement force
RL
gross reinforcement force,likely lower
valueRU
gross reinforcement force,likely upper
valueT1rupture tensile force
at
which
reinforcement rupturesshear force
serviceability strength
of
reinforcement(i.e.
at
max. allowable elongation vertical loadyieId tensile load
at
which
reinforcement yields(R)l,2,
etc. horizontal resultant forceson
wedgesin
stability analysis qb surcharge pressure above backfillsurcharge pressure above reinforced zone applied vertical surcharge
Q empirical constant
for
determining relativedensity
index, 'R Q maximum compaction forceper unit width
of
rollerQh horizontal component
of
appliedpoint
loadQ
vertical componentof
appliedpoint
load radiusof
slip circlepore pressure ratio
design
value
of
pore pressure ratio R reactionon
a
foundationR resultant thrust
R121221 etc. reactions between wedges
in
stability analysis Rh horizontal componentof
load on
footingR
vertical componentof
load on footingmean effective stress
(=
(°'
+
o'3)/2)Sh horizontal spacing
of
reinforcement elementssu undrained shear strength
Sud undrained shear strength
of
foundationdesign
undrained shear strengthvertical spacing
of
reinforcement layersS specific strength
(of
a
polymer)S spacing between transverse members taking bearing
maximum shear stress
(=(°'i
— 635/2)time
in creep
test design lifeaged
lifeT temperature
design temperature
U porewater pressure
Umax maximum
pore
pressure ina
slopeU12 C. water upthrusts normal
to
slidingface
of
wedgesVg granular specific volume
specific volume
at
start
of
shearingspecific volume
at
criticalstate
(constant volume) W weightof
reinforcedsoil
blocketc. weight
of
wedgeW
width of
reinforcementX distance
of
point load
edgeof
crest.x
(dx) shear displacementy
(dy) vertical displacementz depth below ground surface
effective
depthin
slopeof
effective heightH'
depth
below slope surfaceof
clay
embankment depth below slope crestof
changein
reinforcementcritical depth
where bond
length equals reinforcement lengthdepth
to
groundwater levelload
inclination(=
r/s1)b
coefficientof
bondds
coefficientof
direct
slidingslope angle from horizontal y
unit
weightof
soildesign
value
of
unit
weightof
soilYeff effective
unit
weightof
foundation soil allowingfor
buoyancyunit
weightof
foundation soilyf
submerged weightof
foundation soilYmax maximum
dry
density Yrunit
weightof
reinforced soil Yrd designunit
weightof
reinforced soilNotation
o angle
of
skin friction, soilon
planar reinforcement surfacedesign
angle
of
friction between soil and reinforcement of inclinationof
inclined loading asfooting
(=
tan
Rh/RV)0rnax maximum horizontal displacement
Op peak friction
angle
betweensoil and
reinforcementmaximum settlement
at
crest
of
wall wall roughnessAL'S improvement
in
shearing resistance Aqr incrementof
vertical surcharge83 maximum
tensile
strainin
soilelongation
of
polymer
at
time t'in
creeptest
EEQ tensile elongation
at
force equilibrium8max maximum tensile strain
tensile elongation
of
reinforcement elongationof
reinforcementat
rupturetensile elongation
of
reinforcementat
force
equilibrium8RL tensile elongation
of
reinforcement,likely lower
valuetensile elongation
of
reinforcement,likely upper
value tensile strainin
soil
at
force equilibrium8sL
tensile
strainin
soil, likelylower
value 8sutensile
strainin
soil, likelyupper
valueCyjeld elongation
of
reinforcementat
yieldo inclination
of
reinforcementto
verticalangle
to
horizontalof
trial wedgeoptimum reinforcement orientation
for
bond optimum orientationof
reinforcement05 optimum orientation
of
reinforcementin
directionof
maximum soil tensile strainvane strength correction factor
a'
normaleffective
stressequivalent vertical stress acting
at
levelof
footing baseGo maximum residual stress from compaction
major principal effective stress aS
minor
principal effective stress 0Av available stresseffective bearing stress
on
reinforcement(oJ)
bearing stress ratiobearing capacity
of
foundation soilmaximum effective bearing stress beneath rough
footing
of
effective widthI
0comp maximum horizontal stress caused
by
compactionhighest effective
stress experienced bythe
soildesign
normaleffective
stressOf applied vertical stress acting
on
effectivefooting
widthI
of
vertical stress applied across reinforced soil foundationeffective vertical stress below footing
Oax
maximum normal effective stresson
reinforcement0min minimum
direct
stress 0mob mobilised stressnormal
effective
stress preconsolidation pressure0Req required stress
current vertical
effective
stressdirect
stresson plane
yy shear stresstf
applied shear stress actingon
effective
footingwidth
£
shear stress4) angle
of
shearing resistance4)' angle
of
shearing resistancein
termsof
effective stress mobilised angleof
shearing resistance,at-rest
conditions4)bd design
angle
of
frictionfor
backfillcritical
state angle
of
shearing resistanceconstant volume (large strain)
angle
of
shearing resistance designvalue
of
effective angleof
shearing resistance 4? angleof
frictionin
normalised plot4? angle
of
shearing reistanceof
foundation soil 4? mobilised angleof
shearing resistanceat
failuretb 4¾ design angleof
shearing resistanceof
foundation soilpeak angle of
shearing resistanceof
foundation soil mobilised angleof
friction4)rnob mobilised effective angle
of
shearing resistancepeak
effectiveangle
of
shearing resistance,i.e.
secant value4)peak