COMPUTER ENGINEERING
MVC ARCHITECTURE : A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH OF IMPLEMENTATION BETWEEN
J2EE AND ASP DOT NET
1
Prof. Kalpesh A. Popat,
2Mr. Arpit K. Ganatra
1
Asst.Professor, Faculty of Computer Applications, Marwadi Education Foundation’s Group of Institutions, Rajkot, Gujarat.
2
B.E.[Computer Engineering] Student, Faculty of Engineering, Marwadi Education Foundation’s Group of Institutions, Rajkot, Gujarat.
kapopat@gmail.com
,arpitganatra@ymail.com
ABSTRACT : Model View Controller (MVC) is a standard design pattern used in website design or in web application development. It is valuable due to its various capabilities like extensibility, maintainability, and reusability. Commonly we separate a web-based application into three tier architecture. Other than web domain MVC Architecture also uses in embedded domain. MVC achieves this by separating the application into three logical components: Model: The model layer is responsible for the business logic of an application.
It will encapsulate access to data stores and will provide a reusable class library. Typically, within the model, you will find facilities for database abstraction, e-mail delivery, validation, and authentication. View: The view layer is typically considered as web design, or templating. It controls the look and feel of data and provides facilities to collect data from the user. Technologies exclusively found in the view are HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Controller: The controller layer combines everything together and merges the styling of the view with the functionality of the model. It is responsible for collecting input data from the view and deciding program execution. The controller will call model facilities and interpret the returning data so that it can be rendered by the view. It is also responsible for all application exception and flow control.
Keywords—MVC Architecture, Model View Controller Architecture, MVC I: INTRODUCTION
The concept of Model-View-Controller (or MVC) is a common one and has become increasingly popular as a design framework. However we found that most introductions to the subject are very bland and abstract. In this paper we try to discuss some of the more practical reasons to go with MVC. Also while MVC can be used for many different kinds of application design, we will focus mostly on its use in web applications. In its most basic sense, MVC is just a clean way of organizing your code. In most web applications, you have a database containing multiple “business objects”, for example different products in an online store. Users can go to different pages in the application to view, update, or delete these “objects”, which are really just rows in a table most of the time. For any given query, the code in your application needs to be able to access the database, retrieve/update the relevant objects, and generate HTML code to be sent back to the browser.
As an example, imagine a simple user management system. People can login and view a list of users.
Each user has a name, email address, and password.
In addition, there are can be user groups, which are sets of users under a given name. A simple web interface for this system would be to have two listing pages, one of users and one for user groups. The user listing page would display a list of all users, and for each user there would be an “edit” link, that would bring you to a new page containing a form for the
different user settings. There would also be a “delete”
link to remove a user, and a “create” button as well.
The group page would work the same way. One way to implement an application like this would be for each page to have a corresponding file written in say, PHP. The page for listing users would connect to the database, get back all the users, and place the user information inside HTML that it would send back to the browser. Form submissions would be handled by getting the new settings from the form, and updating the database.
While the above system works, it has a number of disadvantages. For one, each file would need to directly execute SQL statements in the database. In the case of a change in schema, each file might potentially have to be updated. Also, because the HTML code is intermixed with the rest of the business logic, changes to the interface could become complicated. In addition there would likely be a lot of code that would be duplicated when it comes to retrieving and manipulating objects. Lets look at how we could code this application with MVC. We can separate and consolidate all of the database code (the model), and all of the interface code (the view). All of the actual database interaction lies in the model, which produces a number of simple methods for manipulating objects. For any given page, there is controller, which gathers the appropriate objects and passes them off to views. The view is responsible for displaying the data in a user interface, is often 90%
HTML/JavaScript, with the rest being embedded code (like PHP or Perl) or a template language (like JSTL). There are many benefits to such a system.
First, development can be simplified by allowing the designers to work on HTML and CSS code, and programmers to work on the backend model. These two pieces can be combined with small, simple controllers. Another benefit is in testing. The core of the application lies in the model, which can be tested programmatically dealing with any interface.
Changing and updating the user interface is also much easier. In case we described above, MVC is used as way of organizing code. However, there are a number of frameworks that use MVC to make developing an application simpler. This includes spring for Java (which is now used by RSP Web as of version 2.1), Maypole for Perl, php.MVC for PHP, Rails for Ruby, and many more. These frameworks can make development even simpler, by including interfaces for base model objects, views (often with template languages), and controller classes.
II: MVC FORTHEWEB
To apply MVC to the Web, we use a combination of scripts, server pages, and ordinary objects to implement the various components in a framework we call Web Actions. In this context, both versions of the MVC are relevant, particularly the dual uses of the term controller. For HTTP applications, input and presentation are entirely separate, so an input controller distinct from the view is useful. For applications of any complexity, we also need an application controller to separate the details of application flow from the business logic. Figure 3 shows the framework’s basic object structure.
III: ASP.NET MVC FRAMEWORK
ASP.Net started off using a pattern called Model-View-Presenter, but this pattern got
"replaced" when Microsoft introduced ASP.Net MVC, which implements a similar MVC pattern used in Rails or Django. CodeGuru has a good blog post on MVP vs. MVC and in it there's a good graphic explaining the difference between these two patterns:
Figure 4 ASP.Net MVC framework IV: Implementing MVC with J2EE
From the time that web was used for something than showing static information, developers had to solve a lot of problems derived from HTTP and HTML because they were not thought to support, so many things necessaries to give dynamism to web. So, new concepts and tools were developed to make
COMPUTER ENGINEERING
programming web applications easier and possible such sessions, cookies, etc. We will try to take advantage of these and many other technologies when considered appropriate to help the MVC implementation. In this point it is explained how to implement our MVC model and what technologies we are using for it. In Figure 5 we show a scheme of this and in Figure 6 a web application request collaboration diagram.
Figure 5 : Scheme of the design. It shows the collaboration between different layers
Figure 6 : Web application request collaboration diagram
V: Comparison of MVC implementation between J2EE and ASP.NET
How one technology is better than other in implementing MVC. The fact is both the technologies have their own way of doing things. To do full justice in terms of comparison is divided in two parts. In the first part we will compare MVC implementation without using framework and tools.
In the second part we will bring up the comparison of MVC using j2EE struts as compared to ASP.NET MVC visual studio template.
Figure 7 : Comparison of MVC implementation VI: Overall Comparison Without Framework So as we all know in MVC the first hit comes to the controller and the controller binds the view with the model and sends it to the end user. Model, view and controller form the three core pillars for MVC.
Table 1 : Overall Comparison without Framework Below is simple pictorial representation of how things actually look like.
Figure 8 : Pictorial View VII: The Sample for Comparison
In order to do a proper comparison we have taken a common example. In this example we will do the following:
When the user comes to the web site, the first page user will see is the Index page. So if it is ASP.NET user will see index.aspx page, if it is J2EE user will see index.jsp page.
Index page is nothing but a simple page which takes username and password and sends a login command to the controller.
Once the controller gets the login command, user creates the object of the model and checks if the user is proper or not.
If the user is proper then controller sends the user to welcome view page or else user will be redirected to the error view page.
Figure 9 : A Sample for Comparison
VIII : The Model – Java Bean in J2EE and .NET class in ASP.NET
Let’s start with the simplest part of MVC i.e. model.
For the above example we will create a simple class called as “User”, this class will have two properties
“Username” and “Password”. The client, which for now the controller will set these two properties, can call the “IValid” function to check if the user is valid or not. In J2EE the model is nothing but the Java bean class, in .NET it’s a simple class with setter and getters.
IX : The Controller – Servlet in J2EE and HttpHandler in ASP.NET
The next important part is the controller. The controller forms the heart of MVC. To create a controller in J2EE we create a class which inherits from “HttpServlet” class. The logic of the controller is written in the “processrequest” method. You can access the request and response object using the
“HttpServletRequest” and “HttpServletResponse”
classes. To create a controller in ASP.NET we implement the “IHttpHandler” class and override the
“processrequest” with the controller logic. Below is the simple code of how the controllers are implemented in both the technologies. To Access the request and response object we need to use the context class in ASP.NET while in J2EE its available as the part of function with different objects as shown in the below code snippet.
In the controller we can get the data from request and response using in both technologies using the below code.
We then call the “isValid” function of the model and redirect to welcome page or to the home page depending on if he is a valid user or not. To redirect in J2EE we use the “RequestDispatcher” class and to redirect in ASP.Net we use the “response.redirect”
function.
X : The mapping XML files – Web.xml in J2EE and Web.config in ASP.NET
Now that we have created the controller, we need to map the actions or the URL pattern with the controller. In other word when someone sends an action or URL pattern as “Login” we need to ensure that it invokes the appropriate controller. Mapping of pattern/action to the controller in both technologies is done by using a configuration XML file. In J2EE this configuration file is called as the “Web.xml” file and in ASP.NET it‟s called as “Web.config”. In J2EE in web.xml we first need to map which URL pattern maps with which servlet. For instance you can see in the below web.xml code snippet we have mapped the Login pattern with LoginServlet servlet name.
XI : The View – Servlet in J2EE and HttpHandler in ASP.NET
The next important part is the view. The view is nothing but a simple page with the form tag and action having the URL pattern. You can see how the index.jsp and the index.aspx have the action to Login URL pattern. This URL pattern is then mapped in the web.xml and web.config file to the appropriate controller.
COMPUTER ENGINEERING
XII : Conclusion and Future Directions
Model-View-Controller has lasted over 30 years and is used in most modern GUI-frameworks and web-frameworks. It has proven its worth and it's here to stay. We would expect it being used more and more, especially for next-generation frameworks.
MVC does produce more code than hack-and-slash HTML code and it's not that suitable if you code small web-applications. But it should be very suitable if you want to code large web-applications where maintainability, reusability and testability are important. In the future, incorporating this architecture into an Integrated Development Environment will enable faster developing giving to the programmer the possibility of generating big parts of his code automatically. Moreover, building the user interface hierarchically, so it can be used the same delegation as in object oriented technology, makes that repercussions in changing code of the application are very limited.
REFRENCES
1. Alan Knight, N. D. (2002). Objects and the Web. IEEE SOFTWARE , 51-59.
2. Amir Salihefendic. (2011, March). Model View Controller: History, Theory and Usage.
Retrieved November 2, 2012, from http://www.amix.dk: http://amix.dk/blog/post/19615 3. Kingsley Sage. (n.d.). Model View Controller (MVC) architecture. 18-27.
4. Marty Hall, L. B. (2003). Integrating Servlets and JSP: The Model View Controller (MVC) Architecture. In L. B. Marty Hall, Core Servlets and JavaServer Pages: Volume 1: Core Technologies (pp.
434-463). Prentice Hall PTR.
5. Micael Gallego-Carrillo, I. G.-A.-H. (2005).
Applying Hierarchical MVC Architecture To High Interactive Web Application . Third International Conference I.TECH - 2005, (pp. 1-6).
6. Shivprasad Koirala. (2011, March 17).
Comparison of MVC implementation between J2EE and ASP.NET, Who is the best? Part 1. Retrieved
November 3, 2012, from
http://www.dotnetfunda.com/:
http://www.dotnetfunda.com/articles/article1254- comparison-of-mvc-implementation-between-j2ee- and-aspnet-who-is-the-best.aspx
7. Venkat, N. T. (n.d.). Advantages &
Disadvantages of MVC Architecture. Retrieved
November 3, 2012, from
http://www.allinterview.com/:
http://www.allinterview.com/showanswers/56984.ht ml
