• No results found

The Spinning Period of a Free Electron and the Periods of Spin and Orbital Motions of Electron in Atomic States

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The Spinning Period of a Free Electron and the Periods of Spin and Orbital Motions of Electron in Atomic States"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2015.615229

The Spinning Period of a Free Electron and

the Periods of Spin and Orbital Motions of

Electron in Atomic States

Ziya Saglam1, Mesude Saglam2, S. Burcin Bayram3, Tim Horton3 1Department of Physics, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey

2Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey 3Department of Physics, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA

Received 30 November 2015; accepted 26 December 2015; published 29 December 2015

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

The spinning period for a free electron and the periods of spin and orbital motion of the electron in an atomic state have been calculated. We have shown that for a free electron the spinning pe-riod is:

( )

Ts free

20

1.9 10s

= × . But in the atomic case we show that, both the spin and the orbital

pe-riods depend on the quantum numbers n, ml, ms and the effective Landé-g factor, g

which is a

function of the quantum number l of the atomic state n l m m, , l, s given in Dirac notation. We

have also calculated these periods for the ground state and some excited states—hydrogen and hy-drogen-like atoms. For atomic states the approximate values of spinning period are

( )

Ts atomic

21

10sand the related orbital periods are:

( )

T0 atomic =

(

1016 - 1015

)

s. Therefore atto-second processes which are related to the pulse of 10−18 s will filter the orbital motion of the electron but will be

long enough to detect the details of the spin motion, such as flip-flops.

Keywords

Electron Spin, Landé-g Factor, Magnetic Top Model, Spinning Period, Atto-Seconds Processes

1. Introduction

(2)

re-presentation, we consider the total magnetic moment of an electron in the presence of a magnetic field in the z direction. The z-component of the total magnetic moment of electron is given by [1]

(

*

)

*

total B ml g ms Bml Bg ms l s

µ =µ + =µ +µ =µ µ+

(1)

where µB is the Bohr magneton, which is given by e 2mc and

*

g is the effective Landé-g factor which takes the values *

1 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

g = + =l depending on the values of the outermost electrons and l=0,1, 2, 3, 4 (corresponding to the so called s p d f, , , states respectively).

To calculate the spin period of an electron, we will use the magnetic top model which was first introduced by Barut et al.[2]. For calculating the period of the orbital motion we will use the current loop model [3]-[7].

2. Period of the Spinning Motion of Electron

From Equation (1) the z-component of magnetic moment associated with the spinning motion is:

* *

*

2 2 2

s B s B

g g e

g m

mc

µ =µ = ± µ = ± 

 

(2)

To proceed further, we calculate the intrinsic magnetic moment of electron with a semiclassical, magnetic top model which was first introduced by Barut et al.[2].

In the magnetic top model, the spin angular momentum of electron is produced by the spinning of the elec-tronic charge (−e) which is assumed to be uniformly distributed inside a sphere of a radius R.We denote the spin angular frequency of the rotating charged sphere by ωs, then the magnitude of the magnetic moment of this

sphere can be calculated(AppendixI) to be

2

5

s sphere

e R

c

ω

µ = (3)

In the presence of the magnetic field B=Bzˆ, the z-component of the magnetic moment of the spinning sphere becomes:

2

5

s z

e R

c

ω

µ = ± (4)

If we compare Equation (2) and Equation (4) we can write:

*

2

5 4

s

g mR

ω =  (5a)

2

*

8π 5 s

R m T

g =

 (5b)

where Ts is the spinning period.

Let us consider the equatorial velocity of this spinning sphere, υ=Rωs. A simple relativistic argument

shows that υ=c. Therefore from Equation (5a) we can write:

*

5 4

s

g

R c

mR

υ≡ ω = = (6)

Which defines the radius of electron as below:

*

5 4 g R

mc

=  (7)

For a free electron g*=2 substituting other related variables in Equation (7) gives us the radius of a free electron, Rfree:

11

9 10 cm

free

R = × − (8)

Substitution of Equation (8) in Equation (5b) gives us the spinning period for a free electron:

( )

20

1.9 10 s

s free

(3)

which is in good agreement with the semiclassical calculation of Olszewski [8].

For an electron in an atom, we cannot calculate the radius directly from Equation (7), because we need to know the effective values of g*. For the same reason we must take the effective values of g* in Equation (5b) which gives us

( )

( , , , )

l s

s n l m m

T for the state n l m m, , l, s .

In the following section we find an expression for the period of orbital motion,

( )

T0 (n l m m, , l, s) for the outer-most electron in hydrogen and hydrogen-like atoms: which is given by Equation (14):

( )

0 ( , , , ) 2*

j s

n n l m m

l s

r m T

m g m =

+

When we take the ratio of the periods given in Equation (5b) and Equation (14), we find:

( )

( )

( )

( ) * 2 , , , * 2 , , , 4 5 l s l s

s n l m m l s

o n l m m n

T m g m R

T g r

+

= (10)

Substituting * 5 4 g R mc

=  (from Equation (7)) and rn=n a2 0 with

2

0 2

a me

=  we get:

( )

( , , , ) *4 2 24

( )

*

( )

( , , , )

4

l s l s

l s

s n l m m o n l m m

m g m e g

T T

n c

+ =

 (11)

It is known that when there is no quantum entanglement, for a free electron, the Landé-g factor is equal to 2. For an electron in an atom the Landé-g factor is given by:

(

) (

) (

)

(

)

1 1 1

1

2 1

J J S S L L

g

J J

+ + + − +

= +

+ (12) which varies is in range of gmin = < < =1 g 2 gmax. Recently, Saglam et al. [1] showed that because of the

quantum entanglements in an atom the Landé-g factor is replaced by the effective g-factor, g*which takes the values g*= + =l 1 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 depending on l=0,1, 2, 3, 4 (corresponding to the so called s p d f, , , states respectively) values of the outermost electrons together with the unfilled shells respectively. So the maximum values of the effective Landé-g factor, g* can be as high as 5. Therefore gmin* = <1 g*<gmax* =5.

If we calculate the effective g-factor, g* for the ground state hydrogen atom, 1, 0, 0,1 2 , we found that

*

1

g = . For this value we calculate the period of ground state orbit and find:

( )

( ) 16

1,0,0,1 2 2.6 10 s

o

T = × − .

Substi-tuting this value and n=1, ml =0, ms =1 2,

*

1

g = and other related parameters in Equation (11), we find the spinning period of electron in 1, 0, 0,1 2 state,

( )

( ) 21

1,0,0,1 2 1.48 10 s

s

T ≅ × − . We give the values of

( )

( )

, , j, s s n l m m T

and

( )

0 ( )

, , j, s n l m m

T for the states: 1, 0, 0,1 2 , 2,1, 0,1 2 , 3, 2, 2,1 2 , 4, 3,1,1 2 and 4, 3, 2,1 2 in Table

1.

3. Period of the Orbital Motion of Electron

[image:3.595.170.456.593.722.2]

From Equation (1) the z-component of the total magnetic moment is:

Table 1. The values of

( )

(, , , ) j s

s n l m m

T and

( )

0 (, , , )

j s

n l m m

T for the states.

Spinning periods Periods of orbital motion ( )( )

21 1,0,0,1 2 1.48 10 s

s

T ≅ × − ( ) 16

0 1,0,0,1 2

( )T =2.6 10× − s ( )( )

21 2,1,0,1 2 7.66 10 s

s

T ≅ × − ( )( ) 15

0 2,1,0,1 2 2.08 10 s

T = × −

( )( )

21 3,2,2,1 2 1.77 10 s

s

T ≅ × − ( )( ) 16

0 3,2,2,1 2 6.4 10 s

T = × −

( )( )

21 4,3,1,1 2 1.59 10 s

s

T ≅ × − ( )( ) 15

0 4,3,1,1 2 2.3 10 s

T = × −

( )( )

21 4,3,2,1 2 1.79 10 s

s

T ≅ × − ( )( ) 15

0 4,3,2,1 2 1.1 10 s

(4)

(

*

)

*

j total B ml g ms Bml Bg ms l s µ =µ =µ + =µ +µ =µ µ+

where ml = ±0, 1,,±l, ms = ±1 2,

2 B

e mc

µ =  and g*=1, 2,3, 4,5.

Now we find another expression for µtotal in the current loop model [2]: we assume that the magnetic

mo-ment associated with the orbital motion of electron is produced by the fictitious point charge (−e) rotating in a circular orbit with the angular frequency ωj =2π Tj and the radius rn in x-y plane. In this model the z-com-

ponent of the magnetic moment will be

2 2

π π

j n n

total

total

e r er

IA

c c cT

ω

µ = = = (13)

If we compare Equation (12) and Equation (13) we write:

( )

0 (, , , ) 2*

j s

n n l m m

l s

r m T

m g m =

+

 (14)

where we replace Ttotal by

( )

T0 (n l m, , j,ms); here the subscript (0) stands for orbital motion. Now we can find the values of

( )

0 ( )

, , j, s n l m m

T for hydrogen and hydrogen-like atoms: especially for

, 1, l, s

n nm m states we can put rn =n a2 0 where

2

0 2

a me

=  .

With these replacements Equation (14) becomes:

( )

0 ( , , , ) 2* 4 3 4*

2π 2π

l s

n n l m m

l s l s

r m n

T

m g m me m g m

= =

+ +

 (15)

We note that the quantum number (l) gets involved through the effective Lande-g factor, g* which takes the values g*= +l 1.

For example, for the ground state of hydrogen atom 1,0,0,1/ 2 , substituting g*=1 and the other related parameter in Equation (15), we find:

( )

( ) 16

0 1,0,0,1 2 2.6 10 s

T = × − (16)

Similarly for the state 2,1, 0,1 2 the corresponding period is:

( )

( ) 15

0 2,1,0,1 2 2.08 10 s

T = × − (17)

where we put: n=2, l=1, g*= + =l 1 2 and ml=0 in Equation (15).

Acknowledgments

Authors from Miami University acknowledge financial support from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. NSF-PHY-1309571).

References

[1] Saglam, Z., Bayram, S.B. and Saglam, M. (2010) Journal of Modern Physics, 1,399-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2010.16057

[2] Barut, O.A., Bozic, M. and Maric, Z. (1992) Annals of Physics, 214, 53-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(92)90061-P

[3] Saglam, M. and Sahin, G. (2009) Journal of Modern Physics, B, 23, 4977-4985.

[4] Saglam, M., Saglam, Z., Boyacioglu, B. and Wan, K.K. (2007) Journal of Russian Laser Research, 28, 267-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10946-007-0015-6

(5)

[6] Saglam, M., Boyacioglu, B. and Saglam, Z. (2007) Journal of Russian Laser Research, 28, 377-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10946-007-0026-3

[7] Saglam, M., Saglam, Z. and Boyacioglu, B. (2006) Journal of the Old and New Concepts in Physics, 3, 181-192.

[8] Olszewski, S. (2014) Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 2030-2040. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2014.518199

Appendix I: Calculation of the Magnetic Moment of a Spinning Charge,

Q

Distributed Uniformly inside a Sphere of Radius

R

Let us denote the uniform charge density by ρ0 which is related to the total charge Q by:

2 3

0 0

d 4π d

3

Q R

o o

Q= Qr r=ρ  R

 

(A-I)

where q≡dQo

(

4π dr2 r

)

is the charge of the spherical shell with the radius r and thickness dr. First we

want to calculate the magnetic moment of this spherical shell with the surface charge density (σ =qr2). Let us assume that the spinning is about z-axis with the angular frequency, ωs. Let us consider the charge element

dq in the area of the band with the radius ( sinr θ) and the thickness ( dr θ) in spherical coordinates:

2 2

d d 2π sin d sin d

2 4π

q q

q a r

r

σ  θ θ  θ θ

= = =

    (A-II) The current element dI produced by the rotating band charge with the angular frequency, ωs will be:

d d sin d

2π 4π

s sq

Iq= ω θ θ

  (A-III)

The magnetic moment element of this band current will be:

(

)

2 2 3

d

d π sin sin d

4 s band

qr I

r

c c

ω

µ = θ =  θ θ

  (A-IV)

Integrating over the spherical shell gives us the magnetic moment of this shell, µshell:

(

)

(

)

2 2

π π

3 3

0 0

π 2

2 2 1 2

2 2

0 0

sin d sin d

4 4

1 cos sin d 1 d

2 2 3

s s

shell band

s s s

qr qr

c c

qr qr qr

x x

c c c

ω ω

µ µ θ θ θ θ

ω θ θ θ ω ω

 

= = =

 

= − = − =

(A-V)

If we substitude d

(

4π d2

)

o

qQr r in (A-V) and integrate over the spherical volume, we find the total magnetic moment of the sphere of radius R:

(

)

2 2 5

4

0 0 0

4π d 4π 4π

d d

3 3 3 5

R R R

s o s o s o

sphere sphere

r r r R

r r

c c c

ω ρ ω ρ ω ρ

µ =

µ =

=

= (A-VI)

Substituting (A-I) in (A-VI) we find:

2

5

s sphere

Q R

c

ω

Figure

Table 1. The values of (

References

Related documents

Interplay of irreversible reactions and hydrofracturing This subsection derives reaction relations that formed the reaction zone between the serpentinite and rodingite, to explain

Daane CR, Golab HD, Meeder JH, Wijers MJ, Bogers AJ: Processing and transfusion of residual cardiopulmonary bypass volume: effects on haemostasis, complement activation,

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

This conversion requires Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) based boost converter that can supply a constant DC link voltage with a SPV as its input as the first

(a) SO-OCBs Report Sector I encourage friends and family to use the hospital services. I tell people in other organizations that this is a good organization to work

Although I maintain that values are either equivalent with constructs, or consistent with them at the very least, this claim in no way precludes individuality or uniqueness in one's

Therefore, nonparametric effects of continuous covariates can be estimated on the basis of penalized splines, random walks or univariate Gaussian random fields priors (see