• No results found

Facebook AI’s WAT19 Myanmar English Translation Task Submission

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Facebook AI’s WAT19 Myanmar English Translation Task Submission"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Table 1: Effect of noisy channel reranking when eval-uating on the validation set. On the left of the ”—”symbol there is the dataset used to train the system andthe decoding process used to generate back-translateddata (if any)
Table 2:Combining BT and ST yields better BLEUscore than BT and ST.
Table 4: BLEU scores of systems trained using addi-tional monolingual data.
Table 5: My→En leaderboard5. The values are BLEUscore (second column) and Adequacy scores (third col-umn)
+2

References

Related documents

The hypothesis for the second research question stated that students who participate in restorative justice practices experience a difference in Active Accountability compared to

Even they’re a little different than you, they’re still Latinos so you really don’t ever feel out of place here. Nothing reminds you more

Waldinger (2008, 2015) argues that states effect- ively “ cage ” migrants with irregular legal status by constraining their movement across borders. This caging not only limits

In this study, seismic residual performance of rubber bearing samples with aging deterioration taken from a highway bridge site was evaluated by shear loading

A significant variation in growth was observed among the genotypes with regard to plant height, leaf length, leaf breadth, number of leaves, spike length, flower yield,

Based on the existing measures, Bengkulu city, Bengkulu Selatan, Bengkulu Utara and Rejang Lebong regency have shown better growth in terms of their local

product of the power plant. More exactly, it is a symmetrical section of a parabola around its vertex. The main requirements for appropriate mirror materials are their

densified product - Part B 38 Table 2.13 Biomass fuel combustion properties analyses 50 Table 3.1 Briquetting parameters 68 Table 3.2 Biomass blend with the