• No results found

4 [N,N Bis(2 cyano­ethyl)­amino]­pyridinium perchlorate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "4 [N,N Bis(2 cyano­ethyl)­amino]­pyridinium perchlorate"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, o1697±o1699 DOI: 10.1107/S1600536803021676 Jin-Long Genget al. C11H13N4+ClO4ÿ

o1697

organic papers

Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

4-[

N,N

-Bis(2-cyanoethyl)amino]pyridinium

perchlorate

Jin-Long Geng,aJun Ni,b

Rui Liu,b Hui-Lan Chenband

Zhi-Lin Wangb*

aCollege of Science, Nanjing Agricultural

University, Nanjing 210095, People's Republic of China, andbCoordination Chemistry Institute,

State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, People's Republic of China

Correspondence e-mail: dpxue23@nju.edu.cn

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 293 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.004 AÊ

Rfactor = 0.049

wRfactor = 0.118

Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.7

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2003 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

In the title compound, C11H13N4+ClO4ÿ, the planar geometry

around the amino N atom in the cation suggests conjugation with the-system of the pyridine ring. NÐH O, CÐH O and CÐH N hydrogen-bonding interactions play a key role in the crystal packing.

Comment

The synthesis of 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) has attracted much attention for its excellent catalytic prop-erties in many organic reactions (Hoȯeet al., 1978; Scriven, 1983; Steglich & Hoe¯e, 1969). Its derivatives also display catalytic properties (Huanget al., 1994; Scriven, 1983). In our present research, we ®nd that 4-[N,N -bis(2-cyanoethyl)-amino]pyridine (CEAP) can catalyse an acylation reaction. As part of our research on CEAP and its derivatives, we prepared the title compound, (I). As a derivative of DMAP, compound (I) also has potential catalytic properties in organic reactions.

The title compound, (I), consists of a protonated 4-[N,N -bis(2-cyanoethyl)amino]pyridinium cation and a ClO4ÿanion

(Fig. 1). The sum of the bond angles around amino atom N2 is 360(Table 1), as observed in aminopyridines and their

deri-vatives (Chaoet al., 1977; Ohms & Guth, 1983). The N2ÐC3 bond length of 1.340 (3) AÊ is shorter than the corresponding bond length in CEAP [1.374 (3) AÊ; Ni, Li, Qiet al., 2003] and in its Ag complex [1.358 (5)±1.385 (5) AÊ; Ni, Li, Xue et al., 2003]. This geometric conformation re¯ects conjugation between the lone pair of N2 and thesystem of the pyridine ring (Chao & Schempp, 1977). The protonation makes this conjugation more strong. The ClÐO distances in the ClO4ÿ

are in the range 1.403 (3)±1.430 (3) AÊ, which is within the range of typical values (Rieraet al., 1998). The ClO4ÿanion

and the cation are connected by C5ÐH5 O4 and N1Ð H11 O2 interactions.

Atoms H9aand H10aon the cation interact with N4 on an adjacent cation at (xÿ1,y, z) through CÐH N hydrogen bonds (Table 2). Furthermore, atom H7a also interacts with N3 on an adjacent cation at (x+ 1,y, z). The propagation of

(2)

organic papers

o1698

Jin-Long Genget al. C11H13N4+ClO4ÿ Acta Cryst.(2003). E59, o1697±o1699

molecules and the hydrogen bonds produces a chain along the

aaxis (Fig. 2). The molecules in a chain are parallel with each other and the angle between the molecular chain and the pyridine plane is 40.6 (2). Many chains are arranged along the

caxis forming a layer. We can see in Fig. 3 that all chains in a layer are parallel with each other. The molecules in adjacent chains have the opposite direction and the dihedral angle between the pyridine planes in adjacent chains is 8.5 (2). This

makes it easy for them to bond together through CÐH O hydrogen bonds between cations and ClO4ÿanions. As shown

in Fig. 4, atoms H1 and H2 on the cation interact with O4 and O1 of the ClO4ÿ anion at (1 +x, 32ÿy, zÿ12) through C1Ð

H1 O4 and C2ÐH2 O1 hydrogen bonds. The adjacent layers are also linked by a C6ÐH6b N4(1ÿx, 2ÿy, 2ÿz) hydrogen bond.

Figure 2

(a) View of one molecular chain down the a axis. (b) View of one molecular chain along theaaxis. [Symmetry code: (a)x+ 1,y, z.]

Figure 3

The crystal packing of (I), viewed along theaaxis.

Figure 4

The hydrogen-bond interactions between adjacent chains. H atoms not participating in the hydrogen bonds have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry code: (A)xÿ1,3

2ÿy,12+z.]

Figure 1

(3)

Experimental

FeSO4 (152 mg, 1 mmol) and 4-[N,N

-bis(2-cyanoethyl)amino]-pyridine (200 mg, 1 mmol) were added to 40 ml ethanol. The reaction mixture was re¯uxed for 1.5 h. NaClO4(122.5 mg) was then added to

the reaction mixture and stirred for 15 min. White powder of (I) was ®ltered, washed with ethanol and dried in a vacuum desiccator, yielding 246 mg (82%). Colorless crystals of (I) were obtained by recrystallization from ethanol. The elemental analysis data for C11H13N4+ClO4ÿ are as follows, calculated: C 43.90, H 4.23, N

18.62%; found: C 43.78, H 4.27, N 18.49%. Crystal data

C11H13N4+ClO4ÿ

Mr= 300.70 Monoclinic,P21=c

a= 5.403 (1) AÊ b= 30.252 (5) AÊ c= 8.293 (2) AÊ = 99.24 (1)

V= 1337.9 (5) AÊ3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.493 Mg mÿ3 MoKradiation Cell parameters from 2473

re¯ections = 2.6±25.9

= 0.31 mmÿ1

T= 293 (2) K Needle, colorless 0.400.200.15 mm Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer 'and!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) Tmin= 0.925,Tmax= 0.957

6812 measured re¯ections

2345 independent re¯ections 1848 re¯ections withI> 2(I) Rint= 0.062

max= 25.0

h=ÿ6!6 k=ÿ35!35 l=ÿ8!9 Re®nement

Re®nement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.049

wR(F2) = 0.118

S= 1.00 2345 re¯ections 185 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained re®nement

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.044P)2 + 0.8P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max= 0.001

max= 0.36 e AÊÿ3

min=ÿ0.35 e AÊÿ3

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (AÊ,).

Cl1ÐO1 1.403 (2)

Cl1ÐO3 1.406 (3)

Cl1ÐO4 1.426 (2)

Cl1ÐO2 1.430 (2)

N1ÐC5 1.329 (4)

N1ÐC1 1.331 (4)

N2ÐC3 1.340 (3)

N3ÐC8 1.134 (3)

N4ÐC11 1.134 (4)

O1ÐCl1ÐO3 111.29 (18)

O1ÐCl1ÐO4 108.99 (15)

O3ÐCl1ÐO4 108.6 (2)

O1ÐCl1ÐO2 110.28 (14)

O3ÐCl1ÐO2 109.26 (19)

O4ÐCl1ÐO2 108.38 (14)

C5ÐN1ÐC1 120.8 (3)

C3ÐN2ÐC9 121.3 (2)

C3ÐN2ÐC6 121.92 (19)

C9ÐN2ÐC6 116.71 (19)

Table 2

Hydrogen-bonding geometry (AÊ,).

DÐH A DÐH H A D A DÐH A

N1ÐH11 O2 0.84 (3) 2.09 (3) 2.913 (4) 164 (3)

C1ÐH1 O4i 0.93 2.69 3.326 (4) 126

C2ÐH2 O1i 0.93 2.66 3.579 (3) 168

C5ÐH5 O4 0.93 2.44 3.169 (4) 135

C6ÐH6b N4ii 0.97 2.65 3.487 (3) 145

C7ÐH7a N3iii 0.97 2.73 3.407 (4) 127

C9ÐH9a N4iv 0.97 2.65 3.163 (4) 113

C10ÐH10a N4iv 0.97 2.57 3.257 (4) 128

Symmetry codes: (i) 1‡x;3

2ÿy;zÿ12; (ii) 1ÿx;2ÿy;2ÿz; (iii) 1‡x;y;z; (iv)

xÿ1;y;z.

Atom H11 am bonded to N1 was located in a difference Fourier map and re®ned isotropically. The positions of the other H atoms were ®xed geometrically (CÐH = 0.93±0.97 AÊ) and re®ned using the riding-model approximation (Uiso= 1.2 timesUeqofthe parent atom).

Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 2000); cell re®nement:SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to re®ne structure:SHELXTL; molecular graphics:SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.

This project was supported by the Natural Science Found-ation of China (No. 20171021) and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 2000028436).

References

Bruker (2000).SMART, SAINT, SADABSandSHELXTL.Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Chao, M. & Schempp, E. (1977).Acta Cryst.B33, 1557±1564.

Chao, M., Schempp, E. & Rosenstein, R. D. (1977).Acta Cryst.B33, 1820± 1823.

Hoȯe, G., Steglich, W. & VorbruÈggen, H. (1978).Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 17, 569±583.

Huang, J. T., Cao, A. H., Shao, S. X., Sun, J. W. & Liu, Z. H. (1994).Huaxue Shijie,4, 188±190. (In Chinese.)

Ni, J., Li, Y. Z., Qi, W. B., Liu, Y. J., Chen, H. L. & Wang, Z. L. (2003).Acta Cryst.C59, o470±o472.

Ni, J., Li, Y. Z., Xue, Z., Chen, H. L. & Wang, Z. L. (2003).Acta Cryst.C59, m201±m203.

Ohms, U. & Guth, H. (1983).Z. Kristallogr.162, 174.

Riera, X., Moreno, V., Font-Bardia, M. & Solans, X. (1998).Polyhedron,18, 65±78.

Scriven, E. F. V. (1983).Chem. Soc. Rev.12, 129±161.

Steglich, W. & Hoe¯e, G. (1969).Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.8, 981.

(4)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1697–o1699

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1697–o1699 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803021676]

4-[

N,N

-Bis(2-cyanoethyl)amino]pyridinium perchlorate

Jin-Long Geng, Jun Ni, Rui Liu, Hui-Lan Chen and Zhi-Lin Wang

4-[N,N-bis(2-cyanoethyl)amino]pyridine perchlorate

Crystal data

C11H13N4+·ClO4−

Mr = 300.70 Monoclinic, P21/c

Hall symbol: -P 2ybc

a = 5.403 (1) Å

b = 30.252 (5) Å

c = 8.293 (2) Å

β = 99.24 (1)°

V = 1337.9 (5) Å3

Z = 4

F(000) = 624

Dx = 1.493 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 2473 reflections

θ = 2.6–25.9°

µ = 0.31 mm−1

T = 293 K Needle, colorless 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)

Tmin = 0.925, Tmax = 0.957

6812 measured reflections 2345 independent reflections 1848 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.062

θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°

h = −6→6

k = −35→35

l = −8→9

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049

wR(F2) = 0.118

S = 1.00 2345 reflections 185 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.044P)2 + 0.8P]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max = 0.001

Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3

(5)

supporting information

sup-2

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1697–o1699

Special details

Refinement. The structure was solved by direct methods(Bruker, 2000) and successive difference Fourier syntheses. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional

R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for

calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are

statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

Cl1 −0.29800 (12) 0.67181 (2) 0.89840 (9) 0.0525 (2)

O1 −0.3531 (5) 0.63189 (6) 0.9712 (3) 0.0871 (8)

O2 −0.0382 (4) 0.67343 (6) 0.8831 (3) 0.0731 (6)

O3 −0.4441 (6) 0.67699 (11) 0.7432 (4) 0.1311 (12)

O4 −0.3501 (5) 0.70762 (7) 0.9995 (4) 0.1000 (9)

N1 0.1321 (5) 0.76466 (9) 0.8764 (3) 0.0655 (8)

N2 0.2172 (4) 0.89903 (6) 0.8803 (2) 0.0369 (5)

N3 −0.2007 (4) 0.97220 (8) 0.6239 (3) 0.0559 (6)

N4 0.6700 (5) 0.96439 (9) 1.1714 (3) 0.0719 (8)

C1 0.2853 (6) 0.78309 (9) 0.7850 (3) 0.0567 (7)

H1 0.3739 0.7652 0.7232 0.068*

C2 0.3144 (5) 0.82742 (7) 0.7806 (3) 0.0437 (6)

H2 0.4181 0.8398 0.7134 0.052*

C3 0.1880 (4) 0.85505 (7) 0.8777 (3) 0.0369 (5)

C4 0.0295 (5) 0.83360 (9) 0.9730 (3) 0.0495 (6)

H4 −0.0578 0.8501 1.0400 0.059*

C5 0.0048 (6) 0.78943 (10) 0.9670 (4) 0.0614 (8)

H5 −0.1042 0.7758 1.0278 0.074*

C6 0.3622 (4) 0.92171 (7) 0.7706 (3) 0.0380 (5)

H6A 0.5084 0.9041 0.7594 0.046*

H6B 0.4206 0.9498 0.8186 0.046*

C7 0.2105 (5) 0.92984 (8) 0.6018 (3) 0.0426 (6)

H7A 0.3108 0.9468 0.5368 0.051*

H7B 0.1709 0.9017 0.5477 0.051*

C8 −0.0223 (5) 0.95373 (8) 0.6110 (3) 0.0426 (6)

C9 0.0956 (5) 0.92687 (8) 0.9883 (3) 0.0431 (6)

H9A −0.0738 0.9162 0.9881 0.052*

H9B 0.0843 0.9568 0.9459 0.052*

C10 0.2345 (5) 0.92756 (9) 1.1639 (3) 0.0475 (6)

H10A 0.1374 0.9441 1.2321 0.057*

H10B 0.2530 0.8976 1.2056 0.057*

C11 0.4820 (6) 0.94776 (9) 1.1721 (3) 0.0515 (7)

H11 0.113 (6) 0.7370 (11) 0.878 (4) 0.069 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(6)

supporting information

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1697–o1699

O1 0.0981 (18) 0.0494 (12) 0.122 (2) −0.0068 (11) 0.0439 (16) 0.0176 (12)

O2 0.0588 (13) 0.0638 (13) 0.1018 (17) −0.0070 (10) 0.0280 (12) 0.0032 (11)

O3 0.115 (2) 0.160 (3) 0.100 (2) −0.015 (2) −0.0376 (19) 0.033 (2)

O4 0.110 (2) 0.0592 (14) 0.146 (2) −0.0086 (13) 0.0669 (19) −0.0168 (14)

N1 0.085 (2) 0.0397 (14) 0.0638 (17) −0.0161 (13) −0.0115 (14) 0.0090 (12)

N2 0.0416 (11) 0.0380 (11) 0.0323 (10) 0.0009 (8) 0.0091 (9) −0.0001 (8)

N3 0.0490 (15) 0.0591 (14) 0.0590 (16) −0.0010 (12) 0.0067 (12) 0.0109 (11)

N4 0.0530 (17) 0.0823 (18) 0.0798 (19) −0.0008 (14) 0.0086 (14) −0.0245 (15)

C1 0.0694 (19) 0.0429 (14) 0.0537 (17) 0.0038 (13) −0.0025 (14) −0.0040 (13)

C2 0.0471 (15) 0.0410 (13) 0.0428 (14) 0.0002 (11) 0.0066 (11) 0.0007 (11)

C3 0.0357 (13) 0.0419 (13) 0.0311 (12) −0.0025 (10) −0.0008 (10) 0.0036 (10)

C4 0.0467 (15) 0.0604 (17) 0.0414 (14) −0.0088 (13) 0.0072 (12) 0.0060 (12)

C5 0.065 (2) 0.0637 (19) 0.0522 (18) −0.0256 (16) −0.0009 (15) 0.0164 (15)

C6 0.0382 (13) 0.0368 (12) 0.0392 (13) −0.0039 (10) 0.0071 (11) 0.0007 (10)

C7 0.0461 (14) 0.0470 (14) 0.0357 (13) −0.0023 (11) 0.0100 (11) 0.0040 (10)

C8 0.0473 (16) 0.0427 (13) 0.0371 (14) −0.0080 (12) 0.0050 (12) 0.0073 (11)

C9 0.0424 (14) 0.0505 (14) 0.0357 (13) 0.0078 (11) 0.0046 (11) −0.0020 (11)

C10 0.0481 (15) 0.0584 (16) 0.0362 (14) 0.0081 (12) 0.0073 (12) −0.0041 (12)

C11 0.0535 (18) 0.0588 (17) 0.0411 (16) 0.0115 (14) 0.0039 (13) −0.0124 (12)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Cl1—O1 1.403 (2) C3—C4 1.413 (3)

Cl1—O3 1.406 (3) C4—C5 1.343 (4)

Cl1—O4 1.426 (2) C4—H4 0.9300

Cl1—O2 1.430 (2) C5—H5 0.9300

N1—C5 1.329 (4) C6—C7 1.524 (3)

N1—C1 1.331 (4) C6—H6A 0.9700

N1—H11 0.84 (3) C6—H6B 0.9700

N2—C3 1.340 (3) C7—C8 1.463 (4)

N2—C9 1.460 (3) C7—H7A 0.9700

N2—C6 1.463 (3) C7—H7B 0.9700

N3—C8 1.134 (3) C9—C10 1.528 (3)

N4—C11 1.134 (4) C9—H9A 0.9700

C1—C2 1.351 (3) C9—H9B 0.9700

C1—H1 0.9300 C10—C11 1.462 (4)

C2—C3 1.410 (3) C10—H10A 0.9700

C2—H2 0.9300 C10—H10B 0.9700

O1—Cl1—O3 111.29 (18) N2—C6—C7 112.58 (19)

O1—Cl1—O4 108.99 (15) N2—C6—H6A 109.1

O3—Cl1—O4 108.6 (2) C7—C6—H6A 109.1

O1—Cl1—O2 110.28 (14) N2—C6—H6B 109.1

O3—Cl1—O2 109.26 (19) C7—C6—H6B 109.1

O4—Cl1—O2 108.38 (14) H6A—C6—H6B 107.8

C5—N1—C1 120.8 (3) C8—C7—C6 111.9 (2)

C5—N1—H11 118 (2) C8—C7—H7A 109.2

(7)

supporting information

sup-4

Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o1697–o1699

C3—N2—C9 121.3 (2) C8—C7—H7B 109.2

C3—N2—C6 121.92 (19) C6—C7—H7B 109.2

C9—N2—C6 116.71 (19) H7A—C7—H7B 107.9

N1—C1—C2 121.1 (3) N3—C8—C7 177.6 (3)

N1—C1—H1 119.4 N2—C9—C10 113.06 (19)

C2—C1—H1 119.4 N2—C9—H9A 109.0

C1—C2—C3 120.2 (3) C10—C9—H9A 109.0

C1—C2—H2 119.9 N2—C9—H9B 109.0

C3—C2—H2 119.9 C10—C9—H9B 109.0

N2—C3—C2 122.1 (2) H9A—C9—H9B 107.8

N2—C3—C4 121.8 (2) C11—C10—C9 110.8 (2)

C2—C3—C4 116.1 (2) C11—C10—H10A 109.5

C5—C4—C3 120.1 (3) C9—C10—H10A 109.5

C5—C4—H4 119.9 C11—C10—H10B 109.5

C3—C4—H4 119.9 C9—C10—H10B 109.5

N1—C5—C4 121.6 (3) H10A—C10—H10B 108.1

N1—C5—H5 119.2 N4—C11—C10 176.7 (3)

C4—C5—H5 119.2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

N1—H11···O2 0.84 (3) 2.09 (3) 2.913 (4) 164 (3)

C1—H1···O4i 0.93 2.69 3.326 (4) 126

C2—H2···O1i 0.93 2.66 3.579 (3) 168

C5—H5···O4 0.93 2.44 3.169 (4) 135

C6—H6b···N4ii 0.97 2.65 3.487 (3) 145

C7—H7a···N3iii 0.97 2.73 3.407 (4) 127

C9—H9a···N4iv 0.97 2.65 3.163 (4) 113

C10—H10a···N4iv 0.97 2.57 3.257 (4) 128

References

Related documents

Inequality, Intergenerational Mobility of Women Educational Attainment and Inclusive Policies in Arab Countries. Educational Achievement

The field type de- termines the way we expect the field value to be rendered in words: integer fields can be numeri- cally perturbed, string fields can be spliced, and

The main challenge for the training algorithm is that it must produce rules that accurately lemma- tize OOV words. This requirement translates to two opposing tendencies

The aim of the present study was to determine the post-traumatic interval of the early subdural haematomas based on computed tomography attenuation numbers.. In this

3.2 Conversion from dependency graph A typed dependency representation of a sentence contains a root – that is, a dependency relation in which neither the governor nor the

We show two ways to derive the D rules: one based on unary composition and the other based on a logical characterization of CCG’s rule base (Baldridge, 2002).. We also show how

We actually report results on full morphological disambiguation for Hebrew, a task similar but more challenging than POS tagging: we deal with a tagset much larger than English

However, our analysis is limited to the deviation of market prices from theoretical prices and does not consider the interplay between difference factors such as signalling