• No results found

Service Availability Metrics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Service Availability Metrics"

Copied!
26
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

2014 Service Availability Benchmark Survey

Published by

(2)

© Continuity Software 2014 2

Executive Summary

This benchmark survey presents service availability metrics that allow IT infrastructure, business continuity, and

disaster recovery managers to compare their organization’s performance and practices to their peers.

The results presented here are based on responses from 155 professionals from a wide range of industries and

geographies collected through an online survey.

Some of the key findings of the survey include:

Ensuring customer satisfaction is the most common business driver for service availability, mentioned

by 43% of the survey respondents. The vast majority (90%) indicated service availability is highly

critical to their customers (at least 8 on a scale of 1-10).

At the same time, 41% of the organization surveyed missed their service availability goal for

mission-critical systems in 2013. Organizations with higher service availability goals were significantly less

successful in meeting their goal. Given these results, it is not surprising that 66% of the respondents have

initiatives for improving service availability management in 2014.

The most common and most effective strategy for ensuring service availability is virtualization HA,

used by 72% of the respondents

this year compared to 63% in 2013.

Proactive identification of risks is the top challenge 20% of the respondents face in ensuring service

(3)

© Continuity Software 2014 3

Close to a third (30%) of the respondents state that their cloud application service availability

readiness is not on par with the rest of their systems.

(4)

© Continuity Software 2014 4

Table of Contents

What Drives Service Availability Goals? ... 5

Importance of Service Availability to Customers ... 6

Service Availability Commitment to Customers ... 7

Service Availability Goals ... 8

Service Availability: The Reality ... 9

What is Downtime? ... 10

Last Downtime Event ... 11

Strategies and Tools to Ensure Service Availability ... 12

The Effectiveness of Service Availability Strategies and Tools ... 13

Top Challenges in Ensuring Service Availability ... 14

Cost of Downtime ... 15

Causes for Outages ... 16

Which Industry was Most Successful in Meeting its Service Availability Goals? ... 17

Mission-Critical in the Cloud ... 18

Private Cloud Testing ... 19

Cloud Application Service Availability Readiness ... 20

Annual Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery Budget ... 21

Annual Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery Budget vs. Cost of Downtime ... 22

Respondent Demographics ... 23

Respondent Demographics ... 24

(5)

© Continuity Software 2014 5

What Drives Service Availability Goals?

Ensuring customer satisfaction is the

most common business driver for service

availability, mentioned by 43% of the

survey respondents.

The second most common business driver

for service availability is avoiding

productivity loss, cited by 35% of the

respondents.

Figure 1: Most common business driver for service availability

43% 35% 10% 10% 3% Ensuring customer satisfaction Avoiding

productivity loss Protectingcompany reputation

Regulatory

(6)

© Continuity Software 2014 6

Importance of Service Availability to Customers

The vast majority (90%) of the survey

respondents indicated service

availability is highly critical to their

customers (at least 8 on a scale of 1-10).

Figure 2: How critical is service availability to your customers?

(7)

© Continuity Software 2014 7

Service Availability Commitment to Customers

32% of the organizations don’t have a

formal service availability commitment to

their customers.

At the other end of the spectrum, 42% of

the organizations have a commitment of

less than 8 hours of unplanned downtime

per year, and 13% have the highest level of

commitment—less than one hour a year.

Figure 3: Service availability commitment to customers

(8)

© Continuity Software 2014 8

Service Availability Goals

73% of the organizations have a service

availability goal of over 99.91% (less

than 8 hours of unplanned downtime a

year) for mission critical systems.

That’s compared to 68% that had this goal

in 2013.

(9)

© Continuity Software 2014 9

Service Availability: The Reality

Overall, 41% of the organization surveyed

missed their service availability goal for

mission-critical systems in 2013.

Organizations with higher service availability

goals were significantly less successful in

meeting their goal.

Figure 5: Service availability goals for mission-critical systems: met vs. missed goal

Figure 6: Service availability goals for mission-critical systems

(10)

© Continuity Software 2014 10

What is Downtime?

88% of the survey respondents define

downtime as inaccessible system.

For many of the organizations the definition

of downtime also includes instances when

the system is accessible but some functions

are not operational (51%) or when

performance is severely degraded (36%).

Figure 7: Definition of downtime

(Respondents could select more than one option)

88%

51%

36%

The system is not accessible The system is accessible but some functions are not

operational

The systems is accessible but performance is highly

(11)

© Continuity Software 2014 11

Last Downtime Event

Over half of the companies (59%) had an

outage in the past 3 months and 28% had

an outage in the past month.

Figure 8: Last downtime event

6%

22%

31%

17%

12% 12%

(12)

© Continuity Software 2014 12

Strategies and Tools to Ensure Service Availability

The most common strategy for ensuring

service availability is virtualization HA.

It is used by 72% of the respondents

this

year, compared to 63% in 2013.

Replication to disaster recovery site, which

was the most popular strategy last year,

went down from 77% in 2013 to 70% in

2014.

Figure 9: Strategies and tools to ensure service availability (Respondents could select more than one option)

2% 26% 41% 50% 54% 77% 64% 63% 3% 18% 36% 47% 62% 70% 71% 72% Other Strategic outsourcing / DR as a service

VMware SRM High availability clusters – Unix High availability clusters – Others Replication to disaster recovery site

Restore from backup Virtualization HA

(13)

© Continuity Software 2014 13

The Effectiveness of Service Availability Strategies and Tools

According to the survey results,

virtualization HA is also the most

effective strategy for ensuring service

availability.

Restore from backup, while the second most

common strategy, is viewed as one of the

least effective.

Figure 10: Effectiveness of strategies and tools

(14)

© Continuity Software 2014 14

Top Challenges in Ensuring Service Availability

Proactive identification of risks is the top

challenge respondents face in ensuring

service availability.

Other challenges mentioned include:

Change management

Lack of resources for testing

Cross-domain/cross-team

coordination

Figure 11: Top challenges in ensuring service availability

66% of the respondents indicated they

have initiatives for improving service

availability management in 2014.

Figure 12: Have a service availability initiative

10% 8% 10% 10% 14% 14% 14% 20% Other Measuring service availability risk & readiness

Inadequate system capacity Inadequate documentation of infrastructure…

Cross-domain/cross-team coordination Lack of resources for testing Change management Proactive identification of risks

Yes 66% No

(15)

© Continuity Software 2014 15

Cost of Downtime

For 43% of the organizations surveyed,

every hour of downtime costs $100,000 or

more.

12% of the respondents reported an

hourly downtime cost of more than one

million dollars.

Figure 13: Cost of an hour of downtime

(16)

© Continuity Software 2014 16

Causes for Outages

Hardware failure continues to be the

most common reason for outages,

mentioned by 55% of the respondents.

Other causes for outages include system

upgrade & migration (51%), human error

(47%), application error (43%) and power

outages (39%).

Figure 14: Causes for outages

(Respondents could select more than one option)

9% 17% 7% 38% 38% 46% 47% 8% 14% 10% 39% 43% 47% 51% 55% Other Unknown Cyber attacks Power outages Application error Human error System upgrades & migrations Hardware failure

(17)

© Continuity Software 2014 17

Which Industry was Most Successful in Meeting its Service Availability Goals?

Manufacturing is the industry that was most

successful in meeting its service availability

goals.

At the same time, 59% of the financial

services organizations surveyed missed their

availability goals for mission critical systems.

Figure 15: Which industry met its service availability goal?

79% 60% 50% 44% 41% 21% 40% 50% 56% 59% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Manufacturing High Tech Business Services Healthcare Financial Services

(18)

© Continuity Software 2014 18

Mission-Critical in the Cloud

Enterprises are continuing to shift

mission-critical applications to the cloud.

75% of the organizations run some

mission-critical applications in their private cloud,

compared to 71% in 2013.

Figure 16: Mission critical applications running in the private cloud

47% of the organizations run these

applications in the public cloud, compared to

only 33% which reported doing so in 2013.

Figure 17: Mission critical applications running in the public cloud

(19)

© Continuity Software 2014 19

Private Cloud Testing

47% of the organizations surveyed have

a DR solution in place for their private

cloud system.

Figure 18: Have a DR solution in place for cloud systems

As many as 39% of the organizations

never test their private cloud

availability.

Just over a half of the respondents (51%)

conduct such testing at least once a year.

Figure 19: Frequency of testing private cloud availability

(20)

© Continuity Software 2014 20

Cloud Application Service Availability Readiness

While 26% of the respondents describe

their cloud application service availability

readiness as better than the capabilities

they have for the rest of their systems,

close to a third (30%) state that these

capabilities are not at the same level as

the rest of their systems.

Figure 20: Cloud application service availability readiness

26%

44% 30%

Better than the capabilities we have for the rest of our systems

On par with these capabilities for the rest of our systems Not at the level of

(21)

© Continuity Software 2014 21

Annual Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery Budget

While 90% of the small organizations

surveyed indicate that their annual business

continuity / disaster recovery budget is less

than $5m, 26% of the largest

organizations spend more than $50m a

year, and 13% spend more than $100m.

Figure 21: Annual business continuity / disaster recovery budget by company size

90% 86% 77% 53% 33% 5% 7% 8% 40% 17% 7% 15% 24% 7% 13% 5% 13% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1-500 501-2500 2501-5,000 5,000-10,000 >10,000 > $100m $50-100m $10-50m $5-10m < $5m

Number of employees in the organization

(22)

© Continuity Software 2014 22

Annual Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery Budget vs. Cost of Downtime

Not surprisingly, the budget allocated to

business continuity and disaster

recovery is correlated to the cost of

downtime.

30% of the organizations with a downtime

cost of over $1m an hour have an annual

budget that exceeds $100m.

Figure 22: Annual business continuity / disaster recovery budget vs. cost of downtime 90% 65% 60% 57% 38% 40% 22% 20% 21% 23% 13% 7% 14% 23% 20% 7% 8% 10% 10% 7% 7% 8% 30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% > $100m $50-100m $10-50m $5-10m < $5m

Cost of an hour of downtime

(23)

© Continuity Software 2014 23

Respondent Demographics

44% of the survey respondents come from

organizations of over 10,000 employees.

Figure 23: Number of employees

40% of the respondents have more than

1,000 servers deployed across all their data

centers.

Figure 24: Number of serves deployed across all data centers

(24)

© Continuity Software 2014 24

Respondent Demographics

27% of the survey respondents are in IT

infrastructure management and another

18% are responsible for other IT functions.

12% of the respondents are in business

continuity and another 12% are in disaster

recovery functions.

Figure 25: Job responsibility

18% of the respondents come from the

financial services sector, 17% from

healthcare, 14% from manufacturing and

10% are in the business services sector.

(25)

© Continuity Software 2014 25

Table of Figures

Figure 1: Most common business driver for service availability ... 5

Figure 2: How critical is service availability to your customers? ... 6

Figure 3: Service availability commitment to customers ... 7

Figure 4: Service availability goals for mission critical systems ... 8

Figure 5: Service availability goals for mission-critical systems: met vs. missed goal ... 9

Figure 6: Service availability goals for mission-critical systems ... 9

Figure 7: Definition of downtime ... 10

Figure 8: Last downtime event ... 11

Figure 9: Strategies and tools to ensure service availability ... 12

Figure 10: Effectiveness of strategies and tools ... 13

Figure 11: Top challenges in ensuring service availability ... 14

Figure 12: Have a service availability initiative ... 14

Figure 13: Cost of an hour of downtime ... 15

Figure 14: Causes for outages ... 16

Figure 15: Which industry met its service availability goal? ... 17

Figure 16: Mission critical applications running in the private cloud ... 18

Figure 17: Mission critical applications running in the public cloud ... 18

Figure 18: Have a DR solution in place for cloud systems ... 19

Figure 19: Frequency of testing private cloud availability ... 19

Figure 20: Cloud application service availability readiness ... 20

Figure 21: Annual business continuity / disaster recovery budget by company size... 21

Figure 22: Annual business continuity / disaster recovery budget vs. cost of downtime ... 22

Figure 23: Number of employees ... 23

Figure 24: Number of serves deployed across all data centers ... 23

Figure 25: Job responsibility ... 24

(26)

© Continuity Software 2014 26

Sign up for a Service Availability Assessment

Sign up for a Service Availability Assessment and find out

how your IT organization can improve your ability to

meet critical KPI goals:

Find hidden risks that can jeopardize your datacenter

Test your environment against a database of 5,000+

documented availability risks

Get actionable recommendations that will help you

eliminate availability risks before they impact your

business

100% of the companies that have performed the

assessment uncovered vulnerabilities that were previously

undetected!

Sign up today

About Continuity Software

Continuity Software is a leading provider of

Service Availability Management solutions, helping

many of the world’s largest organizations avoid

infrastructure outages and prevent service

disruptions

.

By proactively detecting single-points-of-failure

and deviations from vendor best-practices across

all layers of the IT infrastructure, our software will

help you ensure IT operations excellence and 24x7

availability.

For more information

References

Related documents

Five Key Performing Areas (KPAs) of Airport Operation namely; Operations at airport, Financial Perspective of Airport, Environmental Issues at Airport, Safety and Security at

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rela- tive performance of 26 public urban transportation organizations in India using various criteria.. We grouped these 19 criteria

Availability Management Service Continuity Management Performance Management Service Monitoring Business System Management Event Management Service Request Service Execution

Also, be sure to subscribe to the RCGroups 2021 Torrey Pines Gulls DLG Contest/Clinic Series thread for the latest contest

Overall, we have shown that the proposed voting approach using adapted data fusion techniques can be effectively ap- plied to expert search, Indeed, the best performing runs in Table

Difference between an Authorised Participant and market maker An Authorised Participant is a person approved by the Responsible Entity in accordance with paragraph 9.1(d) above,

I conducted this study to determine if the efficacy of TR-VRET is at least equal to traditional VRET that uses simulated virtual reality environments if realism is increased

From November 2005 to October 2012, Kathleen served as Chief Underwriting Officer SVP for ACE Tempest Re Bermuda’s International Property Catastrophe reinsurance business.. Prior