• No results found

10th TF-Storage Meeting

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "10th TF-Storage Meeting"

Copied!
33
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Netapp

@

10th TF-Storage Meeting

Wojciech Janusz, Netapp Poland Bogusz Błaszkiewicz, Netapp Poland

(2)

Agenda

Data Ontap Cluster-Mode

pNFS

(3)

FAS Market Share Trend – Revenue

NetApp 13.8% EMC 29.4% Dell 8.8% IBM 12.1% HP 10.7%

(4)

432TB 144 Drives 408TB 136Drives 4,320TB 1,440 Drives 6TB Flash Cache 4,320TB 1,440 Drives 8TB Flash Cache 1,800TB 600 Drives 1TB Flash Cache 3,600TB 1,200 Drives 3TB Flash Cache 2,880TB 960 Drives 2TB Flash Cache 720TB 240 Drives 512GB Flash Cache

New Entry Systems Added to Line

Truly unified

Most efficient

Extremely flexible

FAS/V3210 FAS2040 FAS/V6240 FAS/V6280 FAS/V3240 FAS/V6210 FAS/V3270 FAS2240

(5)
(6)

 NAS and SAN

 Familiar Ethernet and FC infrastructures

 No special client or host code

 FAS/V62x0, FAS60x0,

 FAS/V32x0, FAS31x0

 FAS3070, FAS3040, FAS2040*

 SATA, SAS, FC, and SSD storage

 Third-party arrays with V-Series

 Flash Cache

Data ONTAP 8.1 Cluster-Mode System

Multiprotocol Access (NFS/CIFS/FC/iSCSI/FCoE)

Virtualized Storage and Network

Data ONTAP® 8.1 Cluster-Mode System

(7)

Namespace is unchanged

as volumes move

No client code

Easy to manage

Easy to change

Seamlessly scales to

many petabytes

Access using a single NFS

mount or CIFS share

B A2

A3 A1 B1 B2 A R C A4

Single NFS mount/CIFS share

Data ONTAP 8 Cluster-Mode

(8)

VS1

Data ONTAP 8.1 Cluster-Mode

Virtual Server

 Logical, flexible, secure resource pool for a NAS namespace and LUNs

 All data access is through a Vserver, which supports one or more

protocols

 Includes FlexVol® volumes, LUNs, and logical network interfaces (LIFs)

 Minimum of one Vserver required: can support 100s

SAN hosts/NAS clients

Integrated Shared Architecture

Logical Interfaces

FlexVol volumes

Vserver

LIF2 LIF1

(9)

VS2

Data ONTAP 8.1 Cluster-Mode

Multi-Tenancy

SAN hosts/NAS clients

HA

LIF2 LIF3

LIF4 LIF2 LIF1 LIF1

Workload Isolation

VS1

 Vservers enable multiple storage domains sharing a common resource pool

 Maintain logical separation

– A Vserver defines a domain for

volumes, LIFs, and access protocols  Secure, delegated administration

 100s of Vservers supported

(10)

HA

Data ONTAP 8.1 Cluster-Mode

Cluster Expansion

SAN hosts/NAS clients

Transparent Operational Flexibility

LIF2 LIF1 LIF3

LIF4

VS1

 Nondisruptively grow and redistribute resources

 Vserver adjusts as the cluster is seamlessly expanded

 Mix and match controllers

 Mix and match drive types

− SATA, SAS, FC, SSD

 Third-party arrays with V-Series

 Hosts 1000s of volumes

 PB-sized namespace

(11)

Cluster-Mode Transparent Volume Move

B C A2 A3 C1 A1 B1 B2 A R C2 LUN LUN LUN A B C A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 C1 R LUN LUN Uninterrupted Access

Continuous data access by clients and hosts

Uses Snapshot™ technology to copy data to a new aggregate

in the background

Nondisruptively move volumes between ANY aggregates

anywhere in the cluster

Storage space savings, mirror relationships, and Snapshot copies are unchanged

NFS / CIFS / iSCSI /FC / FCoE

(12)

Cluster-Mode:

On-Demand Flexibility

The Results

 Seamlessly add capacity

 Rebalance resources

 Rapidly deploy new system

The Challenges  “Disk full” errors

 Over-provisioning in anticipation of future capacity needs

 Managing access to new storage

The Benefits

 Nondisruptive volume movement is transparent to clients and hosts

 Namespace and LUN mapping unchanged  Shared storage infrastructure

(13)

Cluster-Mode:

Operational Efficiency

The Results

 Virtualized tiered services

 Integrated unified system

 Match business priorities

The Challenges

 Changing workload demands

 Critical projects need appropriate resources

The Benefits

 Nondisruptive volume movement is transparent to clients and hosts

 Mix controllers and disk types in the same cluster

 On-demand mobility for critical projects  Adapt resources to meet business demand

(14)

Cluster-Mode:

Operational Lifecycle

The Results

 ZERO downtime

 ZERO processing interruptions

 ZERO client changes

The Challenges

 Upgrade an entire storage system  24x7 operation during move

The Execution

 Identify affected volumes and LUNs  Nondisruptively move volumes  Perform technology refresh

(15)

Cluster-Mode Networking Overview

SAN / NAS Mgmt Cluster Interconnect 10GbE HA HA

(16)
(17)

Massively Scalable NAS Platform

One Namespace or Many, Classes of Service

 Heterogeneous cluster

– Mix of controller types in single cluster per workload needs

– Entry, midrange, and high-end platforms – Native and third-party storage

(FAS, V-Series) – Multiprotocol

 Tiered storage

– Match data to disk price/ performance

– Manage multiple tiers in the same namespace or many – Examples  Reference data  DR mirror destination  Scalable archives B C A2 A3 C1 C2 Projects A B C A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 C1 C2 C3 A1 B1 High-Speed Storage (Highest Performance Across All Workloads)

High-Capacity Storage (Lower $/GB)

(18)

Personality Semantics Authentication Identification Permissions Transport Caching Data Locality Stateful

Supports UNIX & WINDOWS Strong (Kerberos)

Stringbased([email protected]) WINDOWS like access

TCP Only File Delegations Referrals NFSv4 Stateless UNIX Only Weak(AUTH_SYS) 32 bit UID/GID UNIX based UDP & TCP Ad-hoc No Remote Access NFSv3 Stateful

Supports UNIX & WINDOWS Strong (Kerberos)

Stringbased ([email protected]) More WINDOWS friendly

TCP Only

Files & Directory Delegations* Referrals NFSv4.1

Comparison of NFSv3, NFSv4 and NFSv4.1

NFSv4.1

Is a minor release

of NFSv4

Does not modify any NFSv4

features

Is only in DOT8.1 c-mode

Bug fixes

Supports pNFS

(19)

pNFS

pNFS Protocol

− Minor version of NFSv4.1

− Transparent to applications

Storage Access Protocol

− files (NFSv4.1)

− blocks (FC, iSCSI, FCoE)

− objects (OSD2)

Control Protocol

− Outside of the

pNFS standard

User Applications NFSv4.1 Generic pNFS layout File layout OSD layout Block layout SUN RPC iSCS I SCSI TCP FCP RDM A pNFS Protocol Control Protocol Metadata

Server Data Servers

Client

(20)

Regular NFS Vs. pNFS

pNFS with Data Ontap 8.1

Meta-data, Control, Data use the same path

NFS

Single Stack

(21)

NFSv4.1 Sessions

RHEL 6.0/ RHEL 6.1

SLES 11 SP1 (Untested)

Important fixes missing

pNFS Files

RHEL 6.2 (File support Only) – kernel 2.6.40

SLES 11 SP 2* (Files & objects)

pNFS Files and Objects

Fedora 16 (Linux-3.0

)

* Internal testing of RHEL Early Access bits under way

Client NFSv4.1 and pNFS in Linux Distributions

(22)

NetApp Sets Record NFS Performance

NetApp® delivers better performance and

efficiency than Isilon

35%

more IOPS

40%

faster response time

50%

less disks

80%

fewer controller nodes

Leading Performance

FAS6240 24-node cluster with Data ONTAP

®

8.1

SPECsfs2008 NFS benchmark

(23)
(24)

Big Data Market Requirements

 Distributed compute farms with standard software

 Simpler systems, faster to deploy

 Optimized balance between compute & storage  Reliable data (metadata)  Very high streaming bandwidth  Dense configurations - GB/s/Rack Unit

 Large data sets (containers)

 Simpler system configurations

 Boundaryless containers (10’s PBs)

 Simple access to dynamic datasets

 New access

technology(CDMI) with legacy application

interfaces

(25)

E-Series Controllers

5400 2600 Host/SAN connectivity • (4) 40Gb IB • (8) 8Gb FC • (16) 8Gb FC Host/SAN connectivity • (8) 6Gb SAS • (8) 8Gb FC and (4) SAS • (8) 1Gb iSCSI and (4) SAS • (4) 10Gb iSCSI and (4) SAS

Drive channels / types / max

• (2) 6Gb SAS ports • SSD/SAS/SED/NL-SAS • Up to 384 drives

Drive channels / types / max

• (2) 6Gb SAS ports • SSD/SAS/SED/NL-SAS • Up to 192 drives Enclosures • (60) drive DE6600 • (24) drive DE5600 • (12) drive DE1600 Enclosures • (60) drive DE6600 • (24) drive DE5600 • (12) drive DE1600 Cache • 12 / 24 / 48 GB Cache • 2 / 4 GB Performance • 6,000 MB/s – disk reads • 3,100 MB/s – CME disk writes • 900,000 IOPS – cache reads • 350,000 IOPS – SSD reads • 150,000 IOPS – disk reads

Performance

(26)

E-series disk shelves

 DE5600

 2U / 24 / 2.5”

– SAS, SAS SSD drives

 DE1600

– 2U / 12 / 3.5” – SAS, SAS SSD

 DE6600

– 4U / 60 / 3.5”

(27)

5400 + DE6600

5400 + DE5600

2600 + DE1600

5460

5424

2612

Any controller to ANY enclosure

Insert 2 E-Series

Controller(s) into enclosure to create 1 storage system (RBOD)

(28)

E Series Power

• 1.8PB in 1 rack

• High density 4U /60

• up to 60GB/s reads

(29)
(30)

StorageGRID

®

E-Series Building Blocks

E2600/5400 + DE6600 120/180TB Array E2600 + DE1660 24TB Arrays 2 x Control Nodes 2 x Storage Nodes 2 x Gateway Nodes 2 x Storage Nodes StorageGRID Software on Generic x86 Servers

(31)

NetApp and StorNext

Designed for

 NetApp E-Series storage

– High performance – High capacity

– Highly reliable foundation

 StorNext File System

– Heterogeneous data sharing across Fibre Channel SAN clients

 Mac, Win, Linux, UNIX

– Simultaneously serve LAN clients with StorNext LAN Gateway & LAN clients

 StorNext Storage Manager (Optional)

– Intelligent archiving

– Data always stored on most cost-effective storage tier

(32)

NetApp Auto Support

Correlate disk latency (hot) with disk type

– 24 billion records – 4 weeks to run query

After Hadoop implementation -> 10.5 hours

Bug detection through pattern matching

– 240 billion records – Too large to run – After Hadoop implementation = 18 hours

(33)

References

Related documents

In order to apply standard VAR tools to our hybrid model, we identify shocks through the following ordering of the variables: (log) industrial production, inflation, money stock

This innovation in the first project meant to create a hybrid learning environment; in the second it supported introducing digital media in a training centre.. The process

Abstract—In this paper, literature results on the statistical simulation of lossy and dispersive interconnect networks with uncertain physical properties are extended to

1) Make a trip to the Latchford Dam Site and confirm site conditions and overall approach for waterway barrier. 2) Discuss water and ice conditions at Latchford Dam with

“ Cleaning Services ” means the cleaning services in respect of the Cleaned Elements to be provided by Project Co pursuant to this Appendix including Routine Cleaning,

We asked that a suitable prison official (i.e. the person who works most closely with Irish Travellers) take charge of completing the survey form for each Irish Traveller prisoner

This study aimed to determine the effect of extracts of tubers of purple sweet potato (Ipomoea Batatas L.) on the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx)

A degree of flow is required to create a high quality laminate and ensure secondary elements such as core and surface gelcoats are well bonded to the prepreg.. However, excessive