• No results found

Persistent Identifiers Implementation in EOSDIS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Persistent Identifiers Implementation in EOSDIS"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Persistent Identifiers Implementation in EOSDIS

H. K. “Rama” Ramapriyan

Science Systems and Applications, Inc. & ESDIS Project, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

ESIP Summer Meeting, July 19-22, 2016

(2)

Topics

Ideal State

Preservation Challenge

Preservation Content

DOI Implementation

(3)

Ideal State

Traceability of everything related to a dataset to be able

to answer all possible questions that user may raise, e.g.,

• What were the inputs?

• How was the dataset generated – software, algorithm, computer,

operating system, etc.?

• Who were the authors of algorithm?

• What instrument(s) did data come from?

• What satellite did it (they) fly on?

• Who funded the development?

• What is the quality of data? What are the limitations?

• What can the dataset be used for?

• What publications have used the dataset?

Unambiguous references important for scientific

understanding and reproducibility

Long-term assumption – authors of datasets and related

items not available for answering questions

(4)

Preservation Challenge

Instrument Teams / PI’s Instrument Developer/ Manufacturer Data gathering project (e.g., flight project) Product Generation Support Teams (SIPSs) DAACs Calibration Team Mission Operations Validation Team Preflight/ Pre-Operations Science Data Products Science Data Product Documentation Mission Data Calibration Science Data Product Software Science Data Product Algorithm Input Science Data Product Validation Science Data Software Tools Ancillary data sources (e.g., NOAA) Level 0 Data Mission logs Major production data Other artifacts

(5)

Preservation Content Categories

1. Preflight/Pre-Operations: Instrument/Sensor characteristics including

pre-flight/pre-operations performance measurements; calibration method; radiometric and spectral response; noise characteristics; detector offsets

2. Science Data Products: Raw instrument data, Level 0 through Level 4

data products and associated metadata

3. Science Data Product Documentation: Structure and format with

definitions of all parameters and metadata fields; algorithm theoretical basis; processing history and product version history; quality assessment information

4. Mission Data Calibration: Instrument/sensor calibration method (in

operation) and data; calibration software used to generate lookup tables; instrument and platform events and maneuvers

5. Science Data Product Software: Product generation software and

software documentation

6. Science Data Product Algorithm Input: Any ancillary data or other data

sets used in generation or calibration of the data or derived product; ancillary data description and documentation

7. Science Data Product Validation: Records, publications and data sets 8. Science Data Software Tools: product access (reader) tools.

9. Checklist: “metadata” about the above 8 categories showing how and

(6)

DOI for datasets - Implementation

Duerr et al (2011) “On the utility of identification

schemes for digital earth science data: an

assessment and recommendations” - DOI:

10.1007/s12145-011-0083-6

ESDIS Project started implementing DOIs in 2011

for datasets held in EOSDIS – goal is to assign

DOIs to all datasets

• ESDIS is DOI issuing authority for datasets at most

DAACs – prefix 10.5067

• Exceptions are ORNL and SEDAC - preceded

ESDIS in DOI implementation

(7)

DOI for datasets - Implementation

Step 5: Review of DOI Information

Step 7:

Reserve/Register/Update DOI Information

Step 1: Visit ESDIS DOI wiki Website

(https://wiki.earthdata.nasa.gov/display/DOIsforEOSDIS/

Step 2: Download DOI Submission Form

(https://wiki.earthdata.nasa.gov/display/DOIsforEOSDIS/ DOI+Submission+Form/

Step 3: Fill the New/Update Form

(check examples on the wiki)

Step 4: Submit Form to ESDIS

(ESDIS Contact Team)

Step 6: Process DOI Information Communicate

Information to the Provider

Step 8: Post Information on the ESDIS wiki

website

ESDIS DOI Team

Data Provider

(8)
(9)

Earth Science Data System Working

Groups Related to Identifiers

Under the umbrella of NASA’s ESDSWG, identifiers

and citations have been themes of WG’s since 2012

• Data Stewardship WG

• DOI WG

• Citations and Identifiers WG

Topics considered:

• Past: DOI Syntax, Assignment Process, Landing

Page Contents, DOI Field Formatting, Citations

Reformatting, Citation Policy

• Current: Identifiers for Non-Dataset Objects (focus

on software right now)

(10)

Citations and Acknowledgements

Open Data and the Importance of Data

Citations: The NASA EOSDIS Perspective

Data Citations and Acknowledgements

• ASDC -

https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/citing-asdc-data

• ASF DAAC -

https://www.asf.alaska.edu/about/how-to-cite-data/

• CDDIS -

http://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/About/Citing_our_data.html

• GES DAAC -

http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/additional/citing-our-data/data_citation.shtml

• GHRC DAAC -

https://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/home/about-ghrc/citing-ghrc-daac-data

• LAADS -

http://modaps.nascom.nasa.gov/services/faq/LAADS_Data-Use_Citation_Policies.pdf

• LP DAAC -

https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/citing_our_data

• NSIDC DAAC -

http://nsidc.org/data/citations.html

• OB.DAAC -

http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/cms/citations

• ORNL DAAC -

http://daac.ornl.gov/citation_policy.html

• PO.DAAC -

http://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/CitingPODAAC

(11)

Challenges

Takes time to implement DOI’s for all

datasets

Identifiers for non-dataset objects still

being considered

Provenance implementation – establishing

links among different objects - still in

(12)

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Nate James (ESDIS Project) and

Amanda Leon (NSIDC DAAC) for their

comments on a draft of this presentation

H. K. Ramapriyan's work was supported

by NASA’s contract NNG15HQ01C with

SSAI

References

Related documents

The present paper presents a ‘ sustainability evaluation ’ of selected critical raw materials (CRMs), by elucidating the availability, critical nature and analysis of

The following contrastive examples show the phonemic status of oral versus nasal vowels. Distribution of vowel clusters.. As Table 3.7 shows, combinations of all vowels are possible

Our study illustrates more than just the features of the international tourism sector in SIDS, but in the final analysis points out the continuing pressures facing small states

Diverse XBOX Organiser & Travel Case 4 Diverse NFS Racing Wheel (bilratt) 1 Diverse Joytech AV-Control Center 1. Diverse VIX Driving

The AT-AR330 enables secure physical separation of co-located Ethernet LANs and provides shared access to the Wide Area Network (WAN).The router uses Frame Relay or digital

This study addressed the viral biodiversity in the Red Sea brine pools and explained the reason of higher abundance of some phages in specific sections than the others in terms

Federal Election Commission 22 was a devastating exposé of campaign finance limitations intended to stifle criticism of the people in power. With his voice being stilled, the

Originally from Bronx, New York city, Pauline completed her Bachelors from Suny University at Albany. During her undergraduate study, she worked on Prostate Carcinogenesis