• No results found

Some Characterizations of Harmonic Convex Functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Some Characterizations of Harmonic Convex Functions"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN 2291-8639

Volume 15, Number 2 (2017), 179-187 DOI: 10.28924/2291-8639-15-2017-179

SOME CHARACTERIZATIONS OF HARMONIC CONVEX FUNCTIONS

MUHAMMAD ASLAM NOOR∗, KHALIDA INAYAT NOOR, SABAH IFTIKHAR

Abstract. In this paper, we show that the harmonic convex functions have some nice properties,

which convex functions enjoy. We also discuss some basic properties of harmonic convex functions. The techniques and ideas of this paper may be a starting point for future research.

1. Introduction

Convexity theory played an important and fundamental role in the developments of various branches of engineering, financial mathematics, economics and optimization. In recent years, the concept of con-vex functions and its variant forms have been extended and generalized using innovative techniques to study complicated problems. It is well known that convexity is closely related to inequality theory. The optimality conditions of differentiable convex functions are characterized by variational inequalities, the origin of which can be traced back to Euler, Lagrange and Newton. On the other hand, convex functions are related to integral inequalities. which are called the Harmite-Hadamard type integral inequalities. For recent developments, see [1,3,9,16] and reference therein.

Related to the arithmetic means, we have harmonic means. The harmonic means have applica-tions in electrical circuit theory and other branches of sciences. For example, the total resistance of a set of parallel resistors is obtained by adding up the reciprocal of the individual resistance value and then considering the reciprocal of their total. Also the harmonic means are used in developing parallel algorithms for solving various problems, see Noor [5]. A significant class of convex functions, called harmonic convex was introduced by Anderson et al. [1] and Iscan [3], independently. Noor and Noor [6,7] have shown that the optimality conditions of the differentiable harmonic convex functions on the harmonic convex set can be expressed by a class of variational inequalities, which is called the harmonic variational inequality. For recent developments and applications, see [5–7,9–14].

To the best of our knowledge, this field is new one and has not been developed as yet. In this paper, we show that the harmonic convex functions have some nice properties [2], which convex functions enjoy. We have investigated several basic properties of harmonic convex functions. We obtained the necessary and sufficient characterization of a differentiable harmonic convex and harmonic quasi convex functions. It is worth mentioning that the harmonic variational inequalities is a new class of variational inequalities and is not studied much. The interested readers are encouraged to study these harmonic variational inequalities. It is high time to find the applications of these inequalities along with efficient numerical methods.

2. Preliminaries

First of all, we recall the following basic concepts.

Definition 2.1. [1]. A set K⊂Rn\ {0} is said to be a harmonic convex set, if

xy

tx+ (1−t)y ∈K, ∀ x, y∈K, t∈[0,1].

Received 4thAugust, 2017; accepted 10thOctober, 2017; published 1stNovember, 2017.

2010Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15; 26D10; 90C23.

Key words and phrases. Convex functions; general preinvex functions; differentiability; Hermite-Hadamard inequality.

c

2017 Authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

(2)

Definition 2.2. [3]. A functionf :K→R, whereK is a nonempty harmonic convex set inRn\ {0}. The functionf is said to be a harmonic convex function on K, if and only if,

f

xy tx+ (1−t)y

≤(1−t)f(x) +tf(y), ∀ x, y∈K, t∈[0,1].

The function f is called strictly harmonic convex on K, if the above inequality is true as a strict inequality for each distinctxandy∈Kand for eacht∈(0,1).The functionf :K→Ris called

har-monic concave (strictly harhar-monic concave) onK if−f is harmonic convex (strictly harmonic convex) onK.

Remark 2.1. Geometric Interpretation

We now consider the geometric interpretation of harmonic convex function. Letxandybe two distinct points in the domain off, and consider the point tx+(1xy−t)y, witht∈(0,1).Note that(1−t)f(x)+tf(y) gives the weighted arithmetic mean of f(x) and f(y), while f(tx+(1xy−t)y) gives the value of f at the point tx+(1xy−t)y.So, for a harmonic convex functionf, the value off at the points on the path tx+(1xy−t)y whose initial point is xand terminal point is y, is less than or equal to the chord joining the points (x, f(x))and(y, f(y)).For a harmonic concave function, the chord is (on or) below the function itself.

Definition 2.3. [16]. A functionf :K→R, whereKis a nonempty harmonic convex set inRn\{0}. The functionf is said to be a harmonic quasi convex function onK, if and only if,

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤max{f(x), f(y)}, ∀ x, y∈K, t∈[0,1].

The functionf is said to be harmonic quasi concave, if−f is harmonic quasi convex. A functionf

is harmonic quasi convex, if wheneverf(y)≥f(x), f(y) is greater than or equal to all the values of

f at the points of the path tx+(1xy−t)y.A function is said to be strictly harmonic quasi convex, if strict inequality holds forf(x)6=f(y).

Definition 2.4. [9]. A function f : K → R, whereK is a harmonic convex set in Rn\ {0}. The functionf is said to be a harmoniclog-convex function on K, if and only if,

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤[f(x)]1−t[f(y)]t, ∀ x, y∈K, t∈[0,1]. (2.1)

From (2.1), it follows that

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ [f(x)]1−t[f(y)]t

≤ (1−t)f(x) +tf(y)

≤ max{f(x), f(y)}, ∀x, y∈K, t∈[0,1],

This shows that, every harmonic log-convex function is harmonic convex and every harmonic convex function is harmonic quasi convex, but the converse is not true.

Also from (2.1), we have

logf( xy

tx+ (1−t)y ≤(1−t) logf(x) +tlogf(y), ∀x, y∈K, t∈[0,1].

For the properties and inequalities of harmonic log-convex functions, see [9,13,14].

3. Main Results

In this section, we discuss some properties of harmonic convex function and harmonic quasi convex function.

(3)

Proof. Letx, y∈ ∩i∈IKi,t∈[0,1]. Then, for eachi∈I,x, y∈Ki,sinceKiis a harmonic convex set,

it follows that

xy

tx+ (1−t)y ∈Ki, ∀i∈I.

Thus

xy

tx+ (1−t)y ∈ ∩i∈IKi.

Hence,∩i∈IKi is harmonic convex set.

Theorem 3.2. Let K be a harmonic set. If fi : K → R, (i = 1,2,3, ..., m) are harmonic convex functions. Then the function

f =

m

X

i=1

aifi, ai≥0, i= 1,2,3, ..., m,

is harmonic convex function.

Proof. LetK be a harmonic set. Then∀x, y∈K andt∈[0,1], we have

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

=

m

X

i=1

aifi

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

m

X

i=1

ai[(1−t)fi(x) +tfi(y)]

= (1−t)

m

X

i=1

aifi(x) +t m

X

i=1

aifi(y)

= (1−t)f(x) +tf(y).

This shows thatf is a harmonic convex function.

Theorem 3.3. Let Kbe a harmonic set. If the functionsfi:K→Rare harmonic convex functions, thenf = max{fi , i= 1,2,3, ..., m} is also harmonic convex.

Proof. Consider,

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

= max

fi

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

, i= 1,2,3, ..., m

= fw

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ (1−t)fw(x) +tfw(y)

= (1−t) max{fi(x)}+tmax{fi(y)}

= (1−t)f(x) +tf(y).

This implies thatf(x) is harmonic convex function.

Theorem 3.4. Let K be a harmonic set. If the functionf :K→Ris harmonic convex function and

g:RRis a linear function, then f◦g is a harmonic convex function.

Proof. Letf be a harmonic convex function andg be a linear function. Then

(g◦f)

xy tx+ (1−t)y

= g

f

xy tx+ (1−t)y

≤ g((1−t)f(x) +tf(y)

= (1−t)g(f(x)) +tg(f(y))

= (1−t)(g◦f)(x) +t(g◦f)(y).

(4)

Theorem 3.5. Let K be a harmonic set. If the function f : K → R is a harmonic quasi convex function andg:R→Ris a nondecreasing function, thenf◦g is a harmonic quasi convex function.

Proof. Letf be a harmonic quasi convex function andgbe a nondecreasing function. Then

(g◦f)

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ g[max{f(x), f(y)}]

= max{g◦f(x), g◦f(y)},

which implies that (g◦f) is a harmonic quasi convex function.

Theorem 3.6. Let f : K → R be a harmonic convex function. If µ = infx∈Kf(x), then the set

E={x∈K :f(x) =µ} is a harmonic convex set. If f is strictly harmonic convex function, then E

is a singleton.

Proof. Letx, y∈E.Since f is harmonic convex function, so

f

xy tx+ (1−t)y

≤(1−t)f(x) +tf(y) =µ,

which implies that tx+(1xy−t)y ∈E and henceE is a harmonic convex set.

For the second part, assume thatf(x) =f(y) =µ.SinceKis a harmonic convex set, so fort∈(0,1),

xy

tx+(1−t)y ∈K. Further, sincef is strictly harmonic convex function, so

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

<(1−t)f(x) +tf(y) =µ.

This contradicts thatµ= infx∈Kf(x) and hence Eis singleton.

Lemma 3.1. LetKbe a nonempty harmonic convex set inRn\ {0}and letf :K→Rbe a harmonic convex function. Then the level set

α={x∈K:f(x)≤α, α∈R}, (3.1)

is a harmonic convex se.

Proof. Letx, y∈Kα.Thenf(x)≤α, f(y)≤α.

Consider,

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ (1−t)f(x) +tf(y)

≤ (1−t)α+tα=α.

Hence tx+(1xy−t)y ∈Kαand thereforeKαis a harmonic convex set.

Remark 3.1. We would like to mention that the converse of above result is not true.

Definition 3.1. [2]. Let K be a nonempty inRn and letf :K

Rbe a function. Then epigraph of

f, denoted by E(f),is defined by

E(f) ={(x, α) :x∈K, α∈R, f(x)≤α}.

Theorem 3.7. LetK be a nonempty harmonic convex set in Rn\ {0} and letf :K

R. Then f is harmonic convex, if and only if,E(f)is a harmonic convex set.

Proof. Assume that f is harmonic convex function and let (x, α),(y, β)∈E(f). Thenf(x)≤αand

f(y)≤β.

Consider , fort∈[0,1],

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ (1−t)f(x) +tf(y)

(5)

Thus tx+(1xy−t)y,(1−t)α+tβ

∈E(f) and henceE(f) is a harmonic convex set. Conversely, assume thatE(f) is a harmonic convex set and letx, y∈K.Then (x, f(x)),(y, f(y))∈E(f) and by the harmonic convexity ofE(f), we have

xy

tx+ (1−t)y,(1−t)f(x) +tf(y)

∈E(f).

Thus,f tx+(1xy−t)y≤(1−t)f(x) +tf(y) for eacht∈(0,1), that is,f is harmonic convex function.

Remark 3.2. If the function f :K→Ris harmoniclog-convex function on the harmonic convex set

K, thenE(f)is a harmonic convex set.

Theorem 3.8. Let K be a harmonic convex set and let f :K →R be a harmonic convex function. Then any local minimum off is a global minimum.

Proof. Letx∈K be a local minimum of the harmonic convex functionf.. Assume the contrary, that is,f(y)< f(x), for some y∈K.Sincef is harmonic convex function, we have

f

xy tx+ (1−t)y

≤(1−t)f(x) +tf(y) ∀x, y∈K, t∈[0,1].

Thus

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

−f(x)≤t[f(y)−f(x)],

from which it follows that for some smallt >0,

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

< f(x).

Contradicting the local minimum. Hence every local minimum off is a global minimum.

Strictly harmonic quasi convex and strictly harmonic quasi concave functions are especially impor-tant in nonlinear programming because they ensure that a local minimum and a local maximum over a harmonic convex set is a global minimum and a global maximum, respectively.

Theorem 3.9. LetK be a harmonic convex set and letf :K→Rbe a strictly harmonic quasi convex function. Consider the problem of minimum off(x)subject to x∈K.If x¯ is a local optimal solution, thenx¯ is also a global optimal solution.

Proof. Assume, on the contrary, that there exists an ˆx ∈ K with f(ˆx) < f(¯x). By the harmonic convexity ofK, tx¯+(1x¯xˆ−tx ∈K for eacht∈(0,1).

Since ¯xis a local minimum by assumption,

f(¯x)< f

x¯xˆ

tx¯+ (1−t)ˆx

∀t∈(0,1).

But becausef is strictly harmonic quasi convex andf(ˆx)< f(¯x), we have

f

x¯xˆ

tx¯+ (1−t)ˆx

< f(¯x) ∀t∈(0,1).

This contradicts the local optimality of ¯x, and the proof is complete.

Lemma 3.2. LetK be a nonempty harmonic convex set inRn\ {0}. Then a functionf :K→Ris a harmonic quasi convex function, if and only if, the level setKα defined by (3.1)is a harmonic convex set.

Proof. Suppose thatf is harmonic quasi-convex function and let x, y∈Kα. Thereforex, y∈K and

max{f(x), f(y)} ≤α.Alsox1= tx+(1xy−t)y ∈K,sinceKis a harmonic convex set. Using the harmonic quasi-convexity off, we have

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

(6)

Hencex1∈Kα and thereforeKα is harmonic convex set.

Conversely, suppose thatKαis harmonic convex set for each real numberα. Letx, y∈Kα.

Further-more, lett∈(0,1) andx1= tx+(1xy−t)y. Note thatx, y∈Kαforα= max{f(x), f(y)}. By assumption,

Kα is harmonic convex set, so thatx1∈Kα. Therefore

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ α= max{f(x), f(y)}.

Hence,f is harmonic quasi-convex and the proof is complete.

Remark 3.3. The level set defined asKα={x∈K:f(x)≤α, α∈R},is sometimes referred to as a lower-level set, to differentiate it from the upper-level set defined asKα={x∈K:f(x)≥α, α∈R}, which is harmonic convex set, if and only if,f is harmonic quasi concave.

Theorem 3.10. If the function f : K →Ris harmonic convex function such that f(x)< f(y), for allx, y∈K, thenf is strictly harmonic quasi convex function.

Proof. By the harmonic convexity of f, we have

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ (1−t)f(x) +tf(y)

< f(x); sincef(x)< f(y),

which shows that the harmonic convex function is strictly harmonic quasi convex function.

Definition 3.2. The function f :K→Ris said to be harmonic pseudo convex function with respect to a strictly positive functionb(·,·)such that

f(y)< f(x)⇒f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

< f(x) +t(t−1)b(x, y), ∀x, y∈K, t∈(0,1).

Theorem 3.11. If the functionf :K →Ris harmonic convex function such thatf(y)< f(x), then

f is harmonic pseudo convex functionf with respect to a strictly positive functionb(·,·).

Proof. Letf(y)< f(x) and letf be a harmonic convex function. Then

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

≤ f(x) +t(f(y)−f(x))

< f(x) +t(1−t)(f(y)−f(x))

= f(x) +t(t−1)(f(x)−f(y))

< f(x) +t(t−1)b(y, x),

whereb(x, y) =f(x)−f(y)>0, the result result.

Remark 3.4. If the function f :K→Ris harmoniclog-convex function such thatf(y)< f(x), then the harmoniclog-convex function is harmonic pseudo convex under the same sense.

Theorem 3.12. Let K be a nonempty harmonic convex set inRn\ {0}and letf :K→Rbe strictly harmonic quasi convex function and lower semicontinuous. Thenf is harmonic quasi convex function.

Proof. Letx, y∈K. Iff(x)6=f(y), then by the strict harmonic quasi convexity off, we must have

f

xy tx+ (1−t)y

<max{f(x), f(y)} ∀ t∈(0,1).

Now, suppose thatf(x) =f(y).To show thatf is harmonic quasi convex, we need to show that

f

xy tx+ (1−t)y

≤f(y) ∀t∈(0,1).

By contradiction, suppose that

f

xy

tx+ (1−t)y

(7)

Denote tx+(1xy−t)y by ¯x. Sincef is lower semicontinuous, there exists a t∈(0,1) such that

f(¯x)> f

xy¯

tx¯+ (1−t)y

> f(y) =f(x). (3.2)

Hence by the strict harmonic quasi convexity of f and since f tx¯+(1xy¯−t)y > f(y), we have f(¯x) <

f t¯x+(1¯xy−t)y, contradicting (3.2). This completes the proof.

The following theorem gives a necessary and sufficient characterization of a differentiable harmonic quasi convex function.

Theorem 3.13. Let K be a nonempty harmonic convex set in Rn \ {0} and let f : K R be differentiable onK. Thenf is harmonic quasi convex, if and only if,

f(x)≤f(y)⇒ hf0(y), xy

y−xi ≤0, ∀x, y∈K.

Proof. Letf be harmonic quasi convex and letx, y∈Kbe such that

f(x)≤f(y).

Using the Taylor series, we have

f

xy x+t(y−x)

=f(y) +thf0(y), xy

y−xi+tk xy y−xkα

y;t

xy y−x

.

whereα

y;t y−xxy

→0, ast→0.

By the harmonic quasi convexity of f, we have f (1−txy)x+ty ≤f(y) and hence the above equation implies that

thf0(y), xy

y−xi+tk xy y−x kα

y;t

xy y−x

≤0.

Dividing byt and taking the limit in the above inequality ast→0, we have

hf0(y), xy y−xi ≤0.

Conversely, suppose thatx, y∈K and thatf(x)≤f(y). We need to show thatf(tx+(1xy−t)y)≤f(y), for allx∈K andt∈(0,1).

We do this by showing that the setL={x0 :x0 =tx+(1xy−t)y, t∈(0,1), f(x

0)> f(y)}is empty.

By contradiction, suppose that there exists anx0

L. Therefore x0 = tx+(1xy−t)y for some t ∈(0,1)

andf(x0)> f(y).

Sincef is differentiable, it is continuous and there must exits aδ∈(0,1), such that

f

x0y

(1−µ)x0+µy

> f(y) for eachµ∈(δ,1),

andf(x0)> f (1−δx)0xy0+δy

. By this inequality and the mean value theorem, we must have

0< f(x0)−f

x0y

(1−δ)x0+δy

= (1−t)hf0(ˆx), x

0y

y−x0i, (3.3)

where ˆx = (1−µ0x)0xy0+µ0y for some µ0 ∈ (δ,1). From it is clear that f(ˆx) > f(y). Dividing (3.3) by

(1−t)>0, it follows thathf0x), x0y

y−x0i>0, which in turn implies that

hf0(ˆx), xy

y−xi>0. (3.4)

But on the other hand f(ˆx) > f(y) ≥ f(x), and ˆx is harmonic combination of x and y. By the assumption of the theoremhf0x), ˆxx

ˆ

x−xi ≤0, and thus we must have

0≥ hf0x), xy

y−xi.

(8)

The following theorem was derived by Noor and Noor [6,7] and it gives a necessary and sufficient characterization of a differentiable harmonic convex function.

Theorem 3.14. [6]. Let K be a harmonic convex set. If f : K → R is a differentiable harmonic convex function on the harmonic convex setK, then

(1) f(y)−f(x)≥ hf0(x), xy

x−yi, ∀x, y∈K

(2) hf0(x)f0(y), xy

x−yi ≤0, ∀ x, y∈K, but the converse is not true.

Theorem 3.15. [6]. Let f be a differentiable harmonic convex function on the harmonic convex set

K. Then x∈K is a minimum off, if and only if,x∈K satisfies

hf0(x), xy

x−yi ≥0, ∀y∈K.

Remark 3.5. The inequality of the typehf0(x), xy

x−yi ≥0is known as harmonic variational inequality, which was introduced by Noor and Noor [6,7].

Definition 3.3. A functionf :K→R, whereKis a nonempty harmonic setRn\ {0}. The function

f is said to be a harmonic pseudo-convex function, if for eachx, y∈K withhf0(y), xy

y−xi ≥0, we have

f(x)≥f(y);or equivalently, iff(x)< f(y), thenhf0(y), xy y−xi<0.

Definition 3.4. A functionf :K→R, whereKis a nonempty harmonic setRn\ {0}. The function

f is said to be a harmonic quasi convex function, if for each x, y ∈ K with f(x) ≤ f(y), we have

hf0(y), xy

y−xi ≤0;or equivalently, ifhf0(y), xy

y−xi>0, thenf(x)> f(y).

Theorem 3.16. Let K be a harmonic convex set and f :K →R a differentiable harmonic convex function on the harmonic convex setK. Iff(x)≤f(y), ∀x, y∈K, thenf is harmonic quasi-convex function. Furthermore, iff(x)< f(y), ∀x, y∈K, thenf is harmonic pseudo-convex function.

Proof. Let f be differentiable harmonic convex function on the harmonic convex set K. Then from Theorem3.14, we have

hf0(y), xy

y−xi ≤f(x)−f(y).

Iff(x)≤f(y), then hf0(y), xy

y−xi ≤ 0. Therefore, from Theorem 3.13, we have f is harmonic

quasi-convex function.

Similarly, if f(x) < f(y), we also have hf0(y), xy

y−xi < 0. So, from the Definition 3.3, we have f is

harmonic pseudo-convex function.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Rector, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Pakistan, for providing excellent research and academic environments.

References

[1] G. D. Anderson, M. K. Vamanamurthy and M. Vuorinen, Generalized convexity and inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 335(2007), 1294-1308.

[2] M. S. Bazaraa, D. Hanif, C. M. Shetty, et al. Nonlinear Programming Theory and Algorithms (Second Edition)[M]. The United States of America: John Wiley and Sons, 1993.

[3] I. Iscan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stats., 43(6)(2014), 935-942.

[4] C. P. Niculescu and L. E. Persson, Convex Functions and Their Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, (2006). [5] M. A. Noor, Advanced Convex Analysis and Optimization, Lecture Notes, CIIT, (2014-2017).

[6] M. A. Noor and K. I. Noor, Harmonic variational inequalities, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 10(5)(2016), 1811-1814. [7] M. A. Noor and K. I. Noor, Some implicit methods for solving harmonic variational inequalities, Inter. J. Anal.

App. 12(1)(2016), 10-14

[8] M. A. Noor and K. I. Noor, Auxiliary principle techinique for variational inequalities, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 11(1)(2017), 165-169.

(9)

[10] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor and S. Iftikhar, Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for harmonic nonconvex functions, MAGNT Research Report. 4(1)(2016), 24-40.

[11] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor and S. Iftikhar, Integral inequalities for differentiable relative harmonic preinvex func-tions(survey), TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. 7(1)(2016),3-19.

[12] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor and S. Iftikhar, Integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for harmonic (h, s)-convex functions, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 11(1)(2016), 61-69.

[13] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor, S. Iftikhar and C. Ionescu, Some integral inequalities for product of harmonic log-convex functions, U.P.B.Sci. Bull., Series A,78(4)(2016),11-19.

[14] M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor, S. Iftikhar and C. Ionescu ,Hermite-Hadmard inequalities for co-ordinated harmonic comvex functions, U.P.B.Sci. Bull., Series A,79(1)(2017),24-34.

[15] J. Pecaric, F. Proschan, and Y. L. Tong, Convex Functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications, Acdemic Press, New york, (1992).

[16] T.-Y. Zhang, Ai-P. Ji, F. Qi, Integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for harmonically quasi-convex func-tions, Proc. Jangjeon. Math. Soc., 16(3)(2013), 399-407.

2

Department of Mathematics, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.

References

Related documents

('93), are already recognizable in all fi rst ‐ stage zoeae, for example, the segmental ganglia, their neuropils and the segmental nerves. The proto ‐ , deuto ‐ , and tritocerebrum

Karel, Adam and Radomir (2013) in a study carried out in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in Czech and Slovak Republic, stated that strategic planning

Dragomir, Some perturbed Ostrowski type inequalities for functions of bounded variation ,Asian-European Journal of Mathematics, 8 (2015), No.. Jawarneh and M.S.M Noorani,

In our present work, we studied the role of the remaining Roco proteins during development, which resulted in the recognition of mild devel- opmental phenotypes in qkgA -null and

This challenge will be approached as followed: define the Software Development Life Cycle and illustrate some development methodologies, define the Agile Manifesto

Arnold's Cat Map is a transformation that can be applied to an image. Pixels of the image appear to be randomly rearranged, however when the transformation is

Content-based image retrieval uses the visual contents of an image such as color, shape, and texture to represent and index the image.. To retrieve images, users provide the

The social and political context in which the intercultural model of Quebec is processed, rather than presenting itself as the ideal model of integration and citizenship,