University of Pennsylvania
ScholarlyCommons
Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations
1989
Imperfectly Competitive Financial Markets
Jorge Caballe Vilella
University of Pennsylvania
Follow this and additional works at:
https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations
Part of the
Economics Commons
This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons.
https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2676
For more information, please contact
repository@pobox.upenn.edu
.
Recommended Citation
Vilella, Jorge Caballe, "Imperfectly Competitive Financial Markets" (1989).
Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations
. 2676.
Imperfectly Competitive Financial Markets
Abstract
The first part of this dissertation, titled "Strategic Behavior and Asymmetric Information in Financial
Markets", studies the effects of changes in the precision of both public and private information in financial
markets in which traders are not price-takers but act strategically. Two different mechanisms of price
formation are considered. The first one is a mechanism with market orders and competitive market makers.
The second one is based on limit orders and market clearing. Under both regimes, the disclosure of more
public information increases the expected profits of liquidity traders at the expense of privately informed
agents. These results are potentially changed in two cases: when the acquisition of private information is costly
and when the disclosure requirements are not uniform across firms and we allow for discretionary liquidity
traders. The implications for price volatility, trading volume, incentives to produce private information,
efficiency of associations of investors and mechanism design are explored.
In the second part (a joint work with Murugappa Krishnan) titled "Insider Trading and Asset Pricing in an
Imperfectly Competitive Multi-Security Market", we study a multi-security financial market in a correlated
environment with asymmetric information and imperfect competition, in which market makers learn about
each return from every order flow, even as an informed trader manipulates what they can learn. Our model is a
generalization of a single-security model by Kyle. In contrast to a previous analysis by Admati under perfect
competition, where the effect of a correlated environment is only to generate various ambiguities, strategic
behavior restores various theoretical regularities, and can "neutralize" all of the correlatedness arising from the
structure of returns and liquidity noise. Even with imperfect private information, strategic behavior helps
generate an equilibrium with simpler structure, which is valuable for applications, especially for justifying
traditional event study procedures even when there is private information.
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Graduate Group
Economics
First Advisor
Beth Allen
Subject Categories
Economics
O rd e r N u m b e r 9015068
Imperfectly com petitive financial markets
Caballe Vilella, Jorge, Ph.D.
U niversity o f Pennsylvania, 1989
U M I
300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106
I M P E R F E C T L Y C O M P E T I T I V E F I N A N C I A L M A R K E T S
J o r g e C a b a l l e V i l e l l a
A D i s s e r t a t i o n
in
E c o n o m i c s
P r e s e n t e d t o t h e F a c u l t i e s o f t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f P e n n s y l v a n i a in
P a r t i a l F u l f i l l m e n t o f t h e R e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e D e g r e e of
D o c t o r of Philo s o p h y .
1 9 8 9
S u p e r v i s o r o f D i s s e r t a t i o n
G r a d u a t e G r o u p C h a i r p e r s o n
D E D I C A T I O N S
T o m y p a r e n t s
T o C l a r a
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I a m gr a t e f u l to all t h e p e o p l e w h o h a v e h e l p e d m e to m a k e t his
d i s s e r t a t i o n .
F irst, I a m gr a t e f u l t o the m e m b e r s o f m y d i s s e r t a t i o n
c omm i t t e e : B e t h A l l e n (advisor), R i c h a r d K i h l strom, G e o r g e Mai l a t h a n d
A n d r e w P o s t l e w a i t e f o r t h e i r a d v i c e a n d en c o u r a g e m e n t . I h a v e a l s o
b e n e f i t e d f r o m v e r y he l p f u l c o m m e n t s b y P a t r i c i o Arrau, Utpal
B h a t t a c h a r y a , J a m e s Foster, N i c k G onedes, Y u k i k o Hirao, M a t t h e w Jackson,
M u r u g a p p a K r i s h n a n (who h a s a l s o c o - a u t h o r e d a pa r t o f thi s
d i s s e r t a t i o n ) , P e t e Kyle, Bill Novshek, P i e t r o R e i chlin, K. Rao
K adi y a l a , As a n i S a r k a r , T i m V anZandt, J e a n - L u c V i l a a n d p a r t i c i p a n t s at
w o r k s h o p s at P e n n a n d at IESE, Spain.
A m o n g t he p e o p l e that h e l p e d to m a k e life at P e n n m u c h easier,
I w o u l d like to m e n t i o n Albe r t Ando, C a r m e n A n s o tegui, G u i l l e r m o C a l v o
a n d A n t o n i o V illanacci. I a m s p e c i a l l y g r a t e f u l to D a v e C a s s f o r h i s
u n c o n d i t i o n a l support.
M y t w o y e a r s o f g r a d u a t e s t u d i e s at the U n i v e r s i t a t A u t o n o m a of
B a r c e l o n a w e r e a l s o a v e r y impo r t a n t p e r i o d in m y l ife that i n f l u e n c e d
m y s u b s e q u e n t education. I t h a n k s p e c i a l l y p r o f e s s o r s X a v i e r
C a l s a m i g l i a , J o a n M a r i a Esteban, A n d r e u M a s - C o l e l l a n d J o a q u i m S i l v e s t r e
b e c a u s e w i t h t h e i r a c a d e m i c g u i d a n c e a n d e n c o u r a g e m e n t p e r s u a d e d m e to
c o n t i n u e m y s t u d i e s in t he U n i t e d States.
F i n a l l y I w ant to t h a n k m y w i f e C l a r a for, a m o n g o t h e r
iii
i n v a l u a b l e things, h e r t i r e l e s s h e l p in t y p i n g t he m a n u s c r i p t m a n y
times.
F i n a n c i a l s u p p o r t at d i f f e r e n t s t a g e s o f m y s t u d i e s p r o v i d e d by
B a n k o f Spain; CIRIT, G e n e r a l i t a t o f Cata l u n y a ; a n d S c h o o l o f A r t s a n d
S c i e n c e s at the U n i v e r s i t y o f P e n n s y l v a n i a is g r a t e f u l l y a c k n o w l e d g e d .
iv
A B S T R A C T
I M P E R F E C T L Y C O M P E T I T I V E F I N A N C I A L M A R K E T S
J o r g e C a b a l l e V i l e l l a
B e t h A l l e n
T h e f i r s t par t o f t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n , t i t l e d " S t r a t e g i c B e h a v i o r
a n d A s y m m e t r i c I n f o r m a t i o n in F i n a n c i a l Ma r k e t s " , s t u d i e s t h e e f f e c t s of
c h a n g e s in t h e p r e c i s i o n o f b o t h p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n in
f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s in w h i c h t r a d e r s a r e not p r i c e - t a k e r s b u t a ct
s t r a t e g i c a l l y . T w o d i f f e r e n t m e c h a n i s m s o f p r i c e f o r m a t i o n a r e
co n s i d e r e d . T h e f i r s t o n e is a m e c h a n i s m w i t h m a r k e t o r d e r s a n d
c o m p e t i t i v e m a r k e t makers. T h e s e c o n d o n e is b a s e d o n l imit o r d e r s a n d
m a r k e t c l e aring. U n d e r b o t h regimes, t he d i s c l o s u r e o f m o r e p u b l i c
i n f o r m a t i o n i n c r e a s e s t h e e x p e c t e d p r o f i t s o f l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r s at the
e x p e n s e o f p r i v a t e l y i n f o r m e d agents. T h e s e r e s u l t s a r e p o t e n t i a l l y
c h a n g e d in t wo cases: w h e n t h e a c q u i s i t i o n o f p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n is
c o s t l y a n d w h e n t h e d i s c l o s u r e r e q u i r e m e n t s a r e n o t u n i f o r m a c r o s s f i r m s
a n d w e a l l o w f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y l i q u i d i t y traders. T h e i m p l i c a t i o n s f or
p r i c e vola t i l i t y , t r a d i n g volume, i n c e n t i v e s to p r o d u c e p r i v a t e
i n f ormation, e f f i c i e n c y o f a s s o c i a t i o n s o f i n v e s t o r s a n d m e c h a n i s m
d e s i g n a r e explored.
In t he s e c o n d p a r t (a j o i n t w o r k w i t h M u r u g a p p a K r i s h n a n )
t i t l e d " I n s i d e r T r a d i n g a n d A s s e t P r i c i n g in a n I m p e r f e c t l y C o m p e t i t i v e
v
M u l t i - S e c u r i t y Market", we s t u d y a m u l t i - s e c u r i t y f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t in a
c o r r e l a t e d e n v i r o n m e n t w i t h a s y m m e t r i c i n f o r m a t i o n a n d i m p e r f e c t
c o m p e t i t i o n , in w h i c h m a r k e t m a k e r s l e a r n a b o u t e a c h r e t u r n f r o m e v e r y
o r d e r flow, e v e n as a n i n f o r m e d t r a d e r m a n i p u l a t e s w h a t t h e y c a n learn.
O u r m o d e l is a g e n e r a l i z a t i o n o f a s i n g l e - s e c u r i t y m o d e l b y Kyle. In
c o n t r a s t to a p r e v i o u s a n a l y s i s b y A d m a t i u n d e r p e r f e c t co m p e t i t i o n ,
w h e r e t h e e f f e c t o f a c o r r e l a t e d e n v i r o n m e n t is o n l y t o g e n e r a t e v a r i o u s
a m b i g u i t i e s , s t r a t e g i c b e h a v i o r r e s t o r e s v a r i o u s t h e o r e t i c a l
r e g u l a r i t i e s , a n d c a n "n e u t r a l i z e " all o f t h e c o r r e l a t e d n e s s a r i s i n g
f r o m t h e s t r u c t u r e o f r e t u r n s a n d l i q u i d i t y noise. E v e n w i t h im p e r f e c t
p r i v a t e in f o r m a t i o n , s t r a t e g i c b e h a v i o r h e l p s g e n e r a t e a n e q u i l i b r i u m
w i t h s i m p l e r s t r u cture, w h i c h is v a l u a b l e f o r a p p l i c a t i o n s , e s p e c i a l l y
f o r j u s t i f y i n g t r a d i t i o n a l ev e n t s t u d y p r o c e d u r e s e v e n w h e n t h e r e is
p r i v a t e inform a t i o n .
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
P A R T 1: S T R A T E G I C B E H A V I O R A N D A S Y M M E T R I C I N F O R M A T I O N IN F I N A N C I A L
M A R K E T S 1
1. I n t r o d u c t i o n a n d R e l a t e d L i t e r a t u r e 2
2. T h e M o del w i t h M a r k e t O r d e r s a n d C o m p e t i t i v e
M a r k e t M a k e r s 12
2. A. T h e Mod e l 12
2.B. E q u i l i b r i u m 19
3. T h e W e l f a r e E f f e c t s o f P u b l i c I n f o r m a t i o n 2 2
3 . A. F r e e P r i v a t e I n f o r m a t i o n 2 2
3.B. C o s t l y I n f o r m a t i o n A c q u i s i t i o n 26
4. P r i c e V o l a t i l i t y a n d T r a d e V o l u m e I m p l i c a t i o n s 31
5. S t r a t e g i c L i q u i d i t y T r a d e r s 35
6. T h e E f f e c t s o f P r i v a t e I n f o r m a t i o n 42
7. C o m m o n P r i v a t e I n f o r m a t i o n 46
8. A M o n o p o l i s t i c M a r k e t f o r I n f o r m a t i o n 50
9. A s s o c i a t i o n s o f I n v e s t o r s 5 7
10. A R a t i o n a l E x p e c t a t i o n s M o d e l w i t h I m p e r f e c t C o m p e t i t i o n 60
10.A. T h e Mod e l 60
10.B. E q u i l i b r i u m 6 5
11. C o m p a r a t i v e S t a t i c s o f the R a t i o n a l E x p e c t a t i o n s w i t h
I m p e r f e c t C o m p e t i t i o n Model 68
12. A C o m p a r i s o n R e s u l t 7 3
v ii
13. Conclusion
- Appendix
- References
75
79
87
PART 2: INSIDER TRADING AND ASSET PRICING IN A N IMPERFECTLY COMPETITIVE
MULTI-SECURITY MARKET (with Murugappa Krishnan) 94
1. Introduction 95
2. Model 99
3. Equilibrium 105
4. General Properties of Equilibrium 113
5. Perfect Private Information 127
6. A Two-Asset Example 129
7. Conclusion 139
- Appendix 141
- References 150
viii
L I S T O F T A B L E S
P A R T 1
T a b l e 1 — T i m e S t r u c t u r e o f t he M a r k e t O r d e r s M o d e l 18
P A R T 2
T a b l e 1 — T i m e S t r u c t u r e o f B a s i c M o d e l 105
T a b l e 2 — L i m i t s 132
T a b l e 2 — L i m i t s (con t i n u e d ) 133
T a b l e 3 — C o m p a r a t i v e S t a t i c s 133
T a b l e 3 — C o m p a r a t i v e S t a t i c s (cont i n u e d ) 134
ix
L I S T O F I L L U S T R A T I O N S
P A R T 1
F i g u r e 1 — P r o d u c t i o n o f P r i v a t e I n f o r m a t i o n
F i g u r e 2 — E x p e c t e d D e m a n d F u n c t i o n
P A R T 2
F i g u r e la — a
i (pv ; P z 5
F i g u r e lb — a
i (pz ; P v 5
F i g u r e2a — a
J (pv ; p z } *1*J
F i g u r e2b — a
J (Pz ; PV)>i*J
F i g u r e3a — b
l (pv : p z )
F i g u r e3b — b 1 (pz; pv) F i g u r e4a — b j(Pv ; p 2 ). F i g u r e4b — b j(p z : P v ). F i g u r e5a — ECirCpv; p j )
F i g u r e5b — E(ir(pz; p ^ )
F i g u r e 6 — E(n(p ) |m s e c u r i t i e s ) , p = 0
93 93 152 152 152 152 153 153 153 153 154 154 154
Part 1
STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR AND ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
IN FINANCIAL MARKETS
1
1. INTRODUCTION AND RELATED LITERATURE
This paper studies the effects of public disclosure of
information by firms about the return of the securities they issue.
More generally, I will study the effects of changes in the precision of
both p ublic and private information in financial markets. This problem
has been addressed in several papers following the path-breaking work by
Hirshleifer (1971). Among others, I mention the papers by A llen
(1987b), Diamond (1985), Hakansson, Kunkel and Ohlson (1982), Ross
(1979), Verrecchia (1582b) and Kyle (1984).
The papers by Allen, Diamond and Verrecchia are the ones that
are most closely related to the present one. The difference between
their approach and mine is that they assume a p erfectly competitive
financial market in the tradition of Grossman a nd Stiglitz (1980) or
Diamond and Verrecchia (1981). I will follow instead the paradigm
pioneered by Kyle (1984, 1985, 1986), Glosten and Milgrom (1985) and
Kihlstrom and Postlewaite (1983). These authors depart from the
previous models by assuming that each agent in the market has a
nonnegligible effect on prices and each agent takes into account this
effect in order to formulate his optimal demand for risky asset. These
models of imperfect competition seem appropriate to study the
performance of thin markets with few traders who are aware of the fact
that they can influence the equilibrium prices, markets with dominant
2
traders, or markets with price setters (market makers) who make
inferences from the observed demand in order to price the traded
securities.
The traditional model of rational expectations with fully
revealing prices, as stated by Grossman (1976, 1978, 1981a) Grossman and
Stiglitz (1976) or Kihlstrom and Mirman (1975), has been subject to
several criticisms. The first problem raised by B eja (1977) and
Grossman a nd Stiglitz (1980) refers to the incentives to use private
information in such markets. If the equilibrium price becomes a
sufficient statistic for all the information in the market, then there
are no incentives for the agents to use their private information,
especially if this information is costly. Agents can observe the
equilibrium price and make all the relevant inferences from this
sufficient statistic. But if all the agents disregard their private
information, then prices cannot aggregate all the existing information
in the economy. This paradox has been s olved in two different ways.
First, Grossman (1977) and Grossman and Stiglitz (1980)
eliminate the possibility of fully revealing prices b y introducing a
source of noise that is uncorrelated with the return of the risky asset.
In this case, prices depend on the realizations of both private signal
and noise. Thus, Grossman and Stiglitz s how that there are still
incentives to become informed because not all the private information is
revealed to the uninformed agents through the price system. There have
been several stories that justify the existence of noise in financial
markets. We c an associate this noise with a random supply of risky
asset or with the random demand for asset made by agents that are
3
l i q u i d i t y c o n s t r a i n e d o r w h o s e t r a d i n g is d e t e r m i n e d e x c l u s i v e l y b y
l i f e - c y c l e reasons.
A n o t h e r s o l u t i o n to t h e G r o s s m a n - S t i g l i t z p a r a d o x c o m e s f r o m
t h e w o r k b y M i l g r o m (1981) w h i c h s p e c i f i e s the e x t e n s i v e f o r m o f a
s e c o n d - p r i c e a u c t i o n f o r a s i n g l e object. In t h i s auction, p r i c e s are
s u b m i t t e d f i r s t b y t h e b i d d e r s a n d a f t e r w a r d s t h e a u c t i o n e e r s e l e c t s t he
s e c o n d h i g h e s t p r i c e as the o ne at w h i c h t h e t r a n s a c t i o n is c a r r i e d out.
T h e a g e n t w h o g e t s t he o b j e c t is the a g e n t w h o h a s s u b m i t t e d the h i g h e s t
bid. G i v e n t h i s s e q u e n c e of moves, b i d d e r s a r e f o r c e d to u s e t h e i r
( p r o b a b l y co s t l y ) p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n e v e n if th e e q u i l i b r i u m p r i c e
b e c o m e s f u l l y r e v e a l i n g 1.
A n o t h e r c r i t i c i s m to t he m o d e l s w i t h f u l l y r e v e a l i n g p r i c e s
c o m e s f r o m th e f a c t that if the n u m b e r o f a g e n t s is f i n i t e a n d a g e n t s
k n o w h o w p r i c e s a r e formed, t h e n t h e y s h o u l d a ct s t r a t e g i c a l l y in o r d e r
to m a n i p u l a t e t he e q u i l i b r i u m price.
B e c a u s e t he p r i c e t a k i n g a s s u m p t i o n in m a r k e t s w i t h f e w a g e n t s
l e a d s to t h e " s c h i z o p h r e n i c b e h a v i o r " p r o b l e m p o s e d b y H e l l w i g (1980),
th e (noisy) r a t i o n a l e x p e c t a t i o n s l i t e r a t u r e i n f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s h a s
f o c u s e d o n l a r g e m a r k e t s w i t h a c o n t i n u u m o f agents, e a c h of t h e m w i t h
n e g l i g i b l e w e i g h t w i t h r e s p e c t to t he w h o l e market.
T h e s o l u t i o n o f th e s e p r o b l e m s s u g g e s t e d b y the l i t e r a t u r e o n
. i m p e r f e c t c o m p e t i t i o n that I will f o l l o w us e s p a r t i a l l y s o m e o f t he
T h e e q u i l i b r i u m p r i c e in M i l g r o m (1981) is a n o r d e r s t atistic. Usually, o r d e r s t a t i s t i c s a r e n o t su f f i c i e n t , but M i l g r o m is a b l e to p r o v i d e a n e x a m p l e of a u c t i o n w h o s e e q u i l i b r i u m p r i c e r e v e a l s all the p r i v a t e i n f o rmation.
4
i d e a s m e n t i o n e d above. F o r instance, s e v e r a l m o d e l s b y K y l e (1984,
1985, 1986) h a v e a s o u r c e o f n o i s e (due to l i q u i d i t y c o n s t r a i n e d
t r a d e r s ) tha t p r e v e n t s p r i c e s f r o m b e i n g f u l l y r e v e a l i n g so tha t
i n f o r m e d a g e n t s s t i l l h a v e i n c e n t i v e s to p a r t i c i p a t e in t he market.
A n o t h e r f e a t u r e o f K y l e ’s m o d e l s is that, as in M i l g r o m
(1981), t h e p r i c e is s e l e c t e d at t he e n d o f t h e a uction. H owever, the
s t r a t e g i c v a r i a b l e s f o r t he a g e n t s a r e not p r i c e s a n y m o r e b u t q u a n t i t i e s
( A d mati a n d P f l e i d e r e r (1988a) a n d K y l e (1985)) o r d e m a n d s c h e d u l e s
( J a c k s o n (1988) a n d K y l e (1986)). Theref o r e , g i v e n t h i s e x t e n s i v e f o r m
o f t h e game, a g e n t s a r e f o r c e d to u s e t h e i r p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n in the
f i r s t s t a g e o f t he game.
Finally, the m o s t imp o r t a n t d e p a r t u r e f r o m t h e n o i s y r a t i o n a l
e x p e c t a t i o n s l i t e r a t u r e is tha t t h e p r i c e t a k i n g a s s u m p t i o n is relaxed.
T h e n u m b e r o f i n f o r m e d a g e n t s is a s s u m e d f i n i t e a n d t h e s e a g e n t s b e h a v e
s t r a t e g i c a l l y b e c a u s e t h e y k n o w t h e m e c h a n i s m b y w h i c h the p r i c e s a r e
formed.
As I h a v e menti o n e d , A l l e n (1987b), D i a m o n d (1985) a n d
V e r r e c c h i a (1982b) h a v e s t u d i e d t h e i s s u e o f the v a l u e o f i n f o r m a t i o n in
f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s in t he c o n t e x t o f a n o i s y r a t i o n a l e x p e c t a t i o n e c o n o m y
w i t h p e r f e c t c o m p e t i t i o n , in w h i c h a g e n t s a r e c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y c o n s t a n t
a b s o l u t e r i s k a v e r s i o n u t i l i t y f u n c t i o n s a n d all r a n d o m v a r i a b l e s a r e
n o r m a l l y dis t r i b u t e d . E v e n t h o u g h the c o m p u t a t i o n s a r e s o m e w h a t
involved, t h e s e a u t h o r s a r e a b l e t o g i v e e x p l i c i t s o l u t i o n s to the
e q u i l i b r i u m a n d to s i g n the e f f e c t s o f t h e i r c o m p a r a t i v e s t a t i c s
e x p e r i m e n t s .
Th e A l l e n a n d D i a m o n d m o d e l s y i e l d d i f f e r e n t p r e d i c t i o n s a b o u t
t h e e f f e c t s o f p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n o n n o n - l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r s ’ welfare.
T h e s e r e s u l t s d e p e n d o n t he w a y in w h i c h n o i s e is i n troduced. A n
a d d i t i o n a l s i g n i f i c a n t f a c t o r is t hat the p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n is c o m m o n
t o all i n f o r m e d a g e n t s in A l l e n ’s p a p e r w h e r e a s it is d i v e r s e in
D i a m o n d ’s case.
V e r r e c c h i a (1982b) p o i n t s o ut t h e d i f f i c u l t y o f a n s w e r i n g the
q u e s t i o n a b o u t t he v a l u e o f p u b l i c o r p r i v a t e information. H e a r g u e s
t h a t s l i g h t l y c h a n g i n g t h e s c e n a r i o s a n d t h e s e q u e n c e o f e v e n t s o f the
m o d e l s w o u l d c h a n g e t he r e s u l t s d r a m a t i c a l l y . A n i n t e r e s t i n g a n a l y s i s
i n V e r r e c c h i a ’s p a p e r r e f e r s to t h e i n c e n t i v e s to a c q u i r e p r i v a t e
i n f o r m a t i o n w h e n m o r e p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n is ava i l a b l e . H i s r e s u l t s s a y
tha t t h e d i s c l o s u r e o f p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n r e d u c e s t h e a m o u n t of
i n f o r m a t i o n p r o d u c e d p r i vately.
O n t he o t h e r hand, K y l e (1984) s t u d i e s t h e e f f e c t s of
d i s c l o s i n g a p u b l i c s i g n a l in a n i m p e r f e c t l y c o m p e t i t i v e f i n a n c i a l
market. H i s a n a l y s i s f o c u s e s o n a f u t u r e s m a r k e t f o r a n a g r i c u l t u r a l
g o o d w h e r e the r e t u r n o n t he f u t u r e d e p e n d s o n t h e p o s i t i o n s t a k e n b y
s p e c u l a t i v e t r a d e r s a n d t h e r a n d o m d e m a n d f o r t h e g o o d m a d e b y
n o n - s p e c u l a t i v e c o n sumers. H e c l o s e s t he m o del b y u s i n g a m a r k e t
c l e a r i n g c o n d i t i o n in w h i c h t h e p r i c e o f t h e g o o d is d e t e r m i n e d a f t e r
t h e s p e c u l a t i v e r o u n d o f t r a d e is c o n c l u d e d a n d t h e s t o c h a s t i c d e m a n d is
r evea l e d . O n t h e contr a r y , t h e m a r k e t I w i l l c o n s i d e r is like t h e o n e
m o d e l e d b y D i a m o n d (1985) o r Adma t i a n d P f l e i d e r e r (1988): a m a r k e t f o r
a n a s s e t w i t h a r a n d o m r e t u r n tha t is i n d e p e n d e n t o f t h e a c t i o n s t a k e n
b y t he s p e c u l a t i v e t r a d e r s d u r i n g the r o u n d o f trade. H owever, K y l e ’s
r e s u l t s a b o u t t h e e f f e c t s o f p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n a r e s i m i l a r to mine.
6
S o m e o f t h e q u e s t i o n s a d d r e s s e d in p r e v i o u s p a p e r s a r e
a n a l y z e d h e r e in the c o n t e x t o f i m p e r f e c t l y c o m p e t i t i v e f i n a n c i a l
markets. I w ill f o c u s m a i n l y o n a m a r k e t w i t h a f i n i t e n u m b e r o f a g e n t s
w h o o w n d i v e r s e p i e c e s o f p r i v a t e i n formation. L i q u i d i t y c o n s t r a i n e d
a g e n t s a r e t h e s o u r c e of n o i s e i n th i s market. T h e m e c h a n i s m o f p r i c e
f o r m a t i o n is m o d e l e d in two d i f f e r e n t ways. I f i r s t c o n s i d e r a mod e l
w i t h c o m p e t i t i v e m a r k e t m a k e r s w h o s e l e c t a p r i c e e q u a l to t h e e x p e c t e d
r e t u r n o f t h e r i s k y a s s e t c o n d i t i o n a l o n all i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e to
them. T h e s t r a t e g i c v a r i a b l e s o f i n f o r m e d a g e n t s a r e q u a n t i t i e s ( m arket
or d e r s ) o f r i s k y a s s e t t hat t h e y w a n t to b u y o r sell. Se c o n d l y , I
b r i e f l y s t u d y a m o del t hat r e s e m b l e s th e t r a d i t i o n a l n o i s y r a t i o n a l
e x p e c t a t i o n s m o d e l w i t h p e r f e c t c o m p e t i t i o n i n w h i c h p r i c e s a r e f o r m e d
b y a u t o m a t i c m a r k e t c l e a r i n g a f t e r all d e m a n d f u n c t i o n s (limit
or d e r s ) a r e s u bmitted. Mo s t o f m y r e s u l t s h o l d i r r e s p e c t i v e o f the
m e c h a n i s m u n d e r c o n s i d e r a t i o n .
O n e s h o r t c o m i n g o f m y a p p r o a c h is that, as in A d m a t i a n d
P f l e i d e r e r (1988a), E a s l e y a n d O ’H a r a (1987), G l o s t e n a n d M i l g r o m (1985)
a n d K y l e (1985), f o r t r a c t a b i l i t y I a s s u m e that p a r t i c i p a n t s in the
m a r k e t a r e r i s k neutral. R i s k n e u t r a l i t y n e g a t e s s o m e r e s u l t s in th e
p r e v i o u s literature. H owever, t h i s e x e r c i s e h a s i n t r i n s i c v a l u e b e c a u s e
p r o v i d e s a n e x p l i c i t e q u i l i b r i u m f o r a c a s e w h e r e p e r f e c t c o m p e t i t i v e
e q u i l i b r i u m f a i l s to exist. If t h e r i s k n e u t r a l a g e n t s ( i n d e x e d b y n)
a r e p r i c e t a k e r s a n d o b s e r v e a s i g n a l s a b o u t th e r e t u r n v o f a n asset, t h e i r d e m a n d w ill b e x n = -oo if E ( v | s ) < p, x = oo if E ( v | s ) > p o r
X n = ^-0°’ + “ ^ ^ = P* O n l y in t h e i m p r o b a b l e c a s e i n w h i c h s = s f o r all n, d o e s e q u i l i b r i u m exist. In t h i s case, p = E( v | s ) is t h e
7
e q u i l i b r i u m price.
W i t h i m p e r f e c t c o m p e t i t i o n t h e "gen e r i c " n o n - e x i s t e n c e r e s u l t
is c h a n g e d b e c a u s e a g e n t s ta k e i nto a c c o u n t t h e i r e f f e c t s o n prices.
E a c h a g e n t r e d u c e s h i s i n t e n s i t y o f r e a c t i o n t o p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n in
o r d e r to r e d u c e the a m o u n t o f i n f o r m a t i o n r e v e a l e d to t h e m a r k e t m a k e r
o r to o t h e r agents. T h e r e v e l a t i o n o f i n f o r m a t i o n w o u l d p u s h t h e p r i c e s
u p w h e n i n f o r m e d a g e n t s r e c e i v e g o o d n e w s a n d e l i m i n a t e p a r t o f th e
p r o f i t s t h a t t he a g e n t s w o u l d o b t a i n if p r i c e s d i d not r e a c t to
i n d i v i d u a l actions.
F u r t h e r m o r e , t h e a s s u m p t i o n o f r i s k n e u t r a l i t y c o m p l e m e n t s the
i m p e r f e c t c o m p e t i t i o n a s s umption. In t h i n m a r k e t s w i t h f e w agents,
u s u a l l y t h e t r a d e r s a r e a g e n t s w h o a r e e i t h e r (wealthy) i n s i d e r s o r
mu t u a l f u n d s w i t h v e r y h i g h r i s k b e a r i n g c a p a city. A f u r t h e r a d v a n t a g e
o f t h e r i s k n e u t r a l i t y a s s u m p t i o n is th a t p e r m i t s o n e t o c o n c e n t r a t e
e x c l u s i v e l y o n s t r a t e g i c i n t e r a c t i o n s a m o n g p a r t i c i p a n t s in the
f i n a n c i a l market.
T h e s e v e r a l a s p e c t s a n d r e s u l t s o f t h e p a p e r a r e s u m m a r i z e d as
follows:
I mo d e l p u b l i c i nformation, as in D i a m o n d (1985) o r K y l e
(1984), a s s u m i n g tha t all a g e n t s a r e a b l e to o b s e r v e a c o m m o n s i g n a l
a b o u t t h e r e t u r n o f t he r i s k y a s s e t in a d d i t i o n to t h e i r p r i v a t e
s i g nals. M o r e p r e c i s e p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n m a k e s i n f o r m e d a g e n t s w o r s e
o f f b e c a u s e it d i s s i p a t e s the i n f o r m a t i o n a l a d v a n t a g e o f t h e s e a g e n t s
w i t h r e s p e c t to t he l i q u i d i t y traders, e v e n if t h e i r r e l a t i v e
i n f o r m a t i o n a l p o s i t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t to t he m a r k e t m a k e r a n d o t h e r
s t r a t e g i c t r a d e r s r e m a i n s u n changed. M o r e p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n m a k e s the
market more liquid, i.e., prices becomes less sensitive to order flows.
This in turn implies a transfer of expected profits from informed
traders to liquidity traders.
My above result is potentially changed in two cases. First,
if private information is costly, the number of informed agents
decreases when more precise public information is disclosed. This
implies that the new e quilibrium will involve less competition among
insiders. This n ew equilibrium may generate less surplus for liquidity
traders. Secondly, liquidity traders in a multi-securities world are
attracted to the most liquid market. This fact alters camouflage
opportunities across markets.
I study the effects of more precise information release o n the
behavior of the price process and the expected volume of transactions
done by the market maker. The volatility of prices increases in an
economy where public information is more intensively released, because
prices can more accurately replicate returns. The expected volume of
the market m a ker’s trade decreases as public information becomes more
precise in the market orders model.
Private information exhibits decreasing returns in my models.
Too much private diverse information may be harmful to informed agents.
This result does not hold in the market orders model with common private
information across agents. In this case, the informed a g e n t s ’ advantage
with respect to the market maker always increases.
Another issue studied here concerns the efficiency of
syndicates of investors. I consider two kinds of associations of
investors: associations in which its members precommit ex ante to share
th e i r p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n a n d a s s o c i a t i o n s t hat s u b m i t c o l l e c t i v e
d e m a n d s o n b e h a l f o f its members. T h e r e l a t i v e e f f i c i e n c y of t h e s e
a s s o c i a t i o n s f r o m t h e p o i n t o f v i e w o f t h e i n f o r m e d a g e n t s is
i n d e p e n d e n t o f the p r e c i s i o n of p u b l i c information.
I a l s o s t u d y t he p e r f o r m a n c e o f a v e r y s t y l i z e d m o n o p o l i s t i c
ma r k e t f o r i n f o rmation. F o r m a r k e t s w i t h a s i n g l e i n s i d e r w h o c a n
p r o d u c e p r i v a t e informa t i o n , t h e i n d u c e d c h a r g e o f i n c e n t i v e s to p r o d u c e
p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n w h e n f u r t h e r p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n is r e l e a s e d d e p e n d s
o n t h e a v e r a g e c o s t o f p r o d u c i n g s u c h p r i v a t e i nformation.
Finally, I o b t a i n t h e f o l l o w i n g c o m p a r i s o n result: if p r i v a t e
i n f o r m a t i o n is v e r y p r e c i s e c o m p a r e d to the p u b l i c info r m a t i o n , t h e n
i n f o r m e d a g e n t s a r e b e t t e r o f f w h e n t he p r i c e is d e t e r m i n e d b y
c o m p e t i t i v e r i s k n e u t r a l m a r k e t m a k e r s t h a n w h e n it is f o r m e d b y
a u t o m a t i c m a r k e t clea r i n g . T h e c o n v e r s e is t r u e f o r l i q u i d i t y traders.
T h i s r e s u l t is a c o n s e q u e n c e o f the d e c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h
p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n a n d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n s h a r i n g i n v o l v e d in t h e limit
o r d e r s model.
T h e p a p e r is o r g a n i z e d as follows:
S e c t i o n 2 p r e s e n t s a m o d e l w i t h m a r k e t o r d e r s a n d m a r k e t
makers. T h i s model h a s a l s o t w o k i n d s of agents: i n f o r m e d a g e n t s a n d
l i q u i d i t y traders. I o b t a i n th e B a y e s i a n - N a s h e q u i l i b r i u m o f t he
p r o p o s e d g a m e w h e n t h e r e is a v a i l a b l e a p i e c e o f p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n
m o d e l e d l ike in D i a m o n d (1985).
S e c t i o n 3 d e r i v e s s o m e w e l f a r e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f i n c r e a s i n g the
p r e c i s i o n of p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n w h e n the p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n is f r e e a n d
w h e n it is costly.
10
S e c t i o n 4 s t u d i e s s o m e e m p i r i c a l i m p l i c a t i o n s of r e l e a s i n g
p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n o n p r i c e v o l a t i l i t y a n d v o l u m e o f t r a d e d o n e b y t he
m a r k e t maker.
S e c t i o n 5 m o d i f i e s t h e p r e v i o u s m o del b y i n t r o d u c i n g
d i s c r e t i o n a r y l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r s that c h o o s e o p t i m a l l y i n w h i c h m a r k e t
t h e y will s u b m i t t h e i r demands.
S e c t i o n 6 a n a l y s e s the e f f e c t s o f i n c r e a s i n g t h e p r e c i s i o n o f
p r i v a t e informa t i o n .
S e c t i o n 7 c o n s i d e r s the c a s e o f c o m m o n p r i v a t e information.
T h i s c a s e is u s e f u l in o r d e r to a n a l y z e th e p e r f o r m a n c e o f a
m o n o p o l i s t i c m a r k e t f o r i n f o r m a t i o n ( S e c t i o n 8) a n d t h e e f f i c i e n c y o f
a s s o c i a t i o n s o f i n v e s t o r s (S e c t i o n 9).
S e c t i o n 10 c o n s i d e r s a d i f f e r e n t mo d e l o f p r i c e f o r m a t i o n in
th e s a m e s p i r i t a s in J a c k s o n (1988) a n d K y l e (1986). T h e e q u i l i b r i u m
p r i c e is d e f i n e d b y m a r k e t c l e a r i n g w h e r e a g e n t s ’ s t r a t e g i e s a r e d e m a n d
f u n c t i o n s ( limit orders). T h e c o m p a r a t i v e s t a t i c s e x p e r i m e n t s of
s e c t i o n s 3, 4 a n d 6 a r e p e r f o r m e d f o r the n e w mo d e l i n S e c t i o n 11.
S e c t i o n 12 c o m p a r e s b o t h m e c h a n i s m s f r o m th e p o i n t o f v i e w o f
t he e x p e c t e d p r o f i t s o f b o t h t y p e s o f agents.
S e c t i o n 13 c o n c l u d e s t he paper.
11
2. T H E M O D E L W I T H M A R K E T O R D E R S A N D C O M P E T I T I V E M A R K E T MAKERS.
W e a r e g o i n g to s t u d y the p r i c e f o r m a t i o n o f a s i n g l e a s s e t in
a m a r k e t w i t h t h r e e k i n d s o f agents: i n f o r m e d traders, n o i s e t r a d e r s a n d
m a r k e t makers.
T h e r e a r e T l i q u i d i t y Cor nois e ) trad e r s , i n d e x e d b y t, i n the m arket. T h e n o i s e t r a d e r s e i t h e r b u y o r s ell q u a n t i t i e s o f r i s k y a s set
m o t i v a t e d b y l i q u i d i t y c onstraints. T h e s e l i q u i d i t y c o n s t r a i n t s c a n be
j u s t i f i e d b y l i f e - c y c l e r e a s o n s a n d o t h e r n e e d s t hat a r i s e o u t s i d e t he
f i n a n c i a l market. T h e impo r t a n t f e a t u r e o f th e b e h a v i o r o f t h e s e
l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r s is that t h e y tr a d e f o r r e a s o n s tha t a r e not r e l a t e d to
t h e p a y o f f o f f i n a n c i a l asset. I w ill a s s u m e t h a t t he net d e m a n d z f o r
. s h a r e s o f e a c h l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r t is n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d . W i t h o u t loss o f g e n e r a l i t y , a s s u m e that z t h a s z e r o m e a n a n d v a r i a n c e e q u a l to <r2 f o r
al l t, a n d C o v ( z . z ) = 0 f o r m * k. T h e r e f o r e , t h e t o t a l net d e m a n d
T m k
z = E z f o r s h a r e s b y t he l i q u i d i t y traders, is n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d
U l
w i t h z e r o m e a n a n d v a r i a n c e cr2, w h e r e <r2 = Ter2 > 0.
A l t e r n a t i v e l y , i n t erpret t h e n o i s e z a s a r a n d o m s u p p l y
o f r i s k y a s s e t (cf. G r o s s m a n a n d S t i g l i t z (1980) a n d D i a m o n d a n d
V e r r e c c h i a (1981), a m o n g others). I n t h i s c a s e I do n ot n e e d to w o r r y
a b o u t t h e w e l f a r e i m p l i c a t i o n s o n t h e l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r s o f o u r
c o m p a r a t i v e statics.
F i n ally, I m ust s a y that t h e a m o u n t o f n o i s e p a r a m e t e r i z e d b y
t h e v a r i a n c e cr2 m a y b e v e r y small, b u t in a n y c a s e I n e e d it in o r d e r
12
to a v o i d h a v i n g f u l l y r e v e a l i n g prices.
T h e r e a r e N i n f o r m e d t r a d e r s ( i n d e x e d b y n) in t h e m a r k e t w h o t r a d e o n t h e b a s i s o f p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e f u t u r e p a y o f f o f the
r i s k y asset. T h e y a r e not a w a r e o f t h e e x a c t n e e d s o f t h e l i q u i d i t y
c o n s t r a i n e d traders. However, t h e y k n o w t h e p a r a m e t e r s o f t he
d i s t r i b u t i o n o f the total net d e m a n d s z f o r s h a r e s b y t h e n o i s e traders.
I c o n s i d e r a s i n g l e a s s e t w h o s e e x p e c t e d r e t u r n v is n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d w i t h m e a n v a n d p r e c i s i o n (the i n v e r s e o f t h e va r i a n c e ) e q u a l to x e (0, co). E a c h i n f o r m e d t r a d e r r e c e i v e s a p i e c e of p r i v a t e
i n f o r m a t i o n t hat t a k e s the f o r m o f a s i g n a l s w h e r e s = v + e . T h e n o i s e c o f t h e s i g n a l is a l s o n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d w i t h m e a n 0 a n d
p r e c i s i o n x ^ > 0 f o r all n (i.e., s is i n f o r m a t i v e a b o u t t h e r e t u r n v).
I a s s u m e tha t the f i r m i s s u i n g t he a s s e t c a n b e f o r c e d b y l a w
to d i s c l o s e at n o c o s t r e l i a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t the e x p e c t e d r e t u r n of
th e asset. I d i s r e g a r d t he d i r e c t c o s t s o f p r o d u c i n g i n f o r m a t i o n a n d
th e i n d i r e c t c ost o f d i s c l o s i n g r e l i a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n u s i n g c o s t l y
s i g n a l s a s d i v i d e n d s ( B h a t t a c h a r y a (1979), M i l l e r a n d R o c k (1985)) o r
c a p i t a l s t r u c t u r e (Ross (1977)). T h i s a s s u m p t i o n a l l o w s o n e to f o c u s
e x c l u s i v e l y o n t he e f f e c t s o f p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n o n the s t o c k mar k e t
t r a d e r s ’ welfare. Sp e c i f i c a l l y , a s in D i a m o n d (1985), I a s s u m e that the
f i r m is e n f o r c e d to r e l e a s e a p u b l i c si g n a l s q t hat t a k e s th e f o r m
5o - ^ + So '
w h e r e e q h a s a n o r m a l di s t r i b u t i o n , w i t h z e r o m e a n a n d p r e c i s i o n t q > 0.
W e c a n i m a g i n e that t h e level of p r e c i s i o n t q c a n be e n f o r c e d b y t h e l e g i s l a t o r in the f o l l o w i n g way. T h e f i r m m u s t be a u d i t e d a n d
13
t h e a u d i t o r h a s to r e l e a s e all t h e i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t h e is a b l e to
o btain. T h e p r e c i s i o n t q is c o n t r o l l e d e x a n t e b y e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e
d i f f e r e n t a c t i v i t i e s o f the f i r m that s h o u l d be audited. B y e n l a r g i n g
t h e s et o f a u d i t e d a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r e c i s i o n x q is increased. All the
p a r t i c i p a n t s in t he m a r k e t o b s e r v e t h e r e a l i z a t i o n o f s q b e f o r e the t r a n s a c t i o n s a r e conducted.
I a s s u m e that (v, z, ...e^, e Q ) are m u t u a l l y i n d e p e n d e n t
r a n d o m variables.
De n o t e t he o p t i m a l d e m a n d o f t h e i n f o r m e d t r a d e r n as
x = x (s , s ) w h e r e x (...) is a m e a s u r a b l e f u n c t i o n o f s a n d s 2 .
n n n 0 n n 0
N o t e that the d e m a n d s a r e n o t a l l o w e d to be c o n t i n g e n t o n p r ices; thi s
p o s s i b i l i t y will be s t u d i e d in S e c t i o n 10. N o t e a l s o t h a t x (*,•)
d e n o t e s t h e d e m a n d s t r a tegy, x is t h e q u a n t i t y d e m a n d e d a s a r a n d o m
varia b l e , a n d x d e n o t e s the r e a l i z a t i o n of thi s r a n d o m varia b l e .
All i n f o r m e d t r a d e r s a r e a s s u m e d to b e r i s k neu t r a l , tha t is
to say, t h e y o n l y c a r e a b o u t m a x i m i z i n g the e x p e c t e d f u t u r e payoff.
T h i s a s s u m p t i o n is c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e b e h a v i o r o f m u t u a l f u n d s that
h a v e a v e r y d i v e r s i f i e d p o r t f o l i o a n d t hat a r e r i s k n e u t r a l a s a group.
O u r model h a s two p eriods. In p e r i o d 1 e a c h t r a d e r s u b m i t s
ma r k e t o r d e r s to a m a r k e t m a k e r w h o is a l s o a s s u m e d to b e r i s k neutral.
T h e m a r k e t m a k e r e s t a b l i s h e s a p r i c e p f o r t he r i s k y a s s e t o n c e he has
o b s e r v e d the total n e t q u a n t i t y d e m a n d e d b y t he t r a d e r s a n d t h e p u b l i c
signal. It is impor t a n t to n o t e tha t t h e mar k e t m a k e r o n l y o b s e r v e s
2 G i v e n the a s s u m p t i o n s o n t h e p r i c i n g rul e b e l o w (mainly, l i n e arity), m i x e d s t r a t e g i e s a r e n e v e r o p t i m a l f o r insiders.
14
"total demands". Thus, he c a n n o t k n o w if a n o r d e r c o m e s f r o m a n
i n f o r m e d t r a d e r o r f r o m a n o i s e trader.
I a s s u m e c o m p e t i t i o n a m o n g ma r k e t makers. T h i s c o m p e t i t i o n
a m o n g p r i c e s e t t e r s f o r c e s t h e m to s e l e c t a p r i c e s u c h tha t t h e y e a r n
z e r o e x p e c t e d p r o f i t s . T h e r e a s o n s f o r t h i s a r e e x a c t l y t h e s a m e that
f o r c e p r i c e to e q u a t e the m a r g i n a l c ost in t h e B e r t r a n d m o d e l o f
o l i g o p o l i s t i c competi t i o n . T h e m a r k e t m a k e r is p r e p a r e d to b u y o r sell
a n y a m o u n t o f r i s k y a s s e t t hat is s u p p l i e d o r d e m a n d e d 3 . N e i t h e r the
m a r k e t m a k e r n o r the i n f o r m e d a g e n t h a v e s h o r t - s e l l i n g cons t r a i n t s .
Thus, a ma r k e t m a k e r m u s t sell v s h a r e s w h e r e w is t h e net t o tal o r d e r f l o w
N
w = £ x n (sn> s Q ) + z . (2.1) T he z e r o p r o f i t c o n d i t i o n (or m a r k e t e f f i c i e n c y c o n d i t i o n )
i m p l i e s that
p = p(w, s Q ) = E(v|w,
SQ)
. (2.2) T h e p r i c e s e l e c t e d e q u a l s the e x p e c t e d r e t u r n c o n d i t i o n a l o na ll i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e to t h e m a r k e t maker. T h e m a r k e t m a k e r use s
th e o r d e r f l o w to m a k e i n f e r e n c e s a b o u t v b e c a u s e it c o n t a i n s p a r t of
T h e a s s u m p t i o n of c o m p e t i t i v e m a r k e t m a k e r s is c o n s i s t e n t w i t h th e i n s t i t u t i o n a l a r r a n g e m e n t s o f t he O v e r - t n e - c o u n t e r (OTC) m a r k e t or th e I n t e r m a r k e t T r a d i n g S y s t e m (ITS) that f o r c e s c o m p e t i t i o n b e t w e e n the N e w Y o r k S t o c k E x c h a n g e (NYSE) m o n o p o l i s t i c s p e c i a l i s t s a n d regi o n a l spec i a l i s t s . F o r o t h e r r u l e s o f d y n a m i c m a r k e t m a k i n g w i t h i n v e n t o r y costs, s e e A m i h u d a n d M e n d e l s o n (1980), G a r m a n (1976) o r O ’H a r a a n d O l d f i e l d (1986).
15
th e p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n o w n e d b y i n f o r m e d a g e n t s 4 .
P r i c e s a r e r a n d o m v a r i a b l e s that a r e m e a s u r a b l e w i t h
r e s p e c t to o r d e r f l o w s a n d t he p u b l i c signals. p(.,.), p a n d p d e n o t e
t h e p r i c i n g rule, t h e e q u i l i b r i u m p r i c e a s a r a n d o m v a r i a b l e a n d t he
r e a l i z a t i o n o f t h i s r a n d o m v a r i a b l e re s p e c t i v e l y .
In p e r i o d 2, the r e a l i z a t i o n o f v is o b s e r v e d a n d e a c h ag e n t r e c e i v e s h i s payoff.
T h i s s e q u e n c e of e v e n t s to d e t e r m i n e p r i c e f o r m a t i o n looks
l i k e t h e o n e u s e d b y A d m a t i a n d P f l e i d e r e r (1988a), D i a m o n d a n d
V e r r e c c h i a (1987) E a s l e y a n d O ’Ha r a (1987), G l o s t e n a n d M i l g r o m (1985),
G o u l d a n d V e r r e c c h i a (1985) a n d K y l e (1985) a n d r e s e m b l e s t h e s t r u c t u r e
p r o p o s e d b y th e a l r e a d y c l a s s i c a l p a p e r o f K r e p s a n d W i l s o n (1982) o n
s e q u e n t i a l eq u i l i b r i u m . But m y a p p r o a c h f o l l o w s m o r e c l o s e l y t h e
a r t i c l e s b y K y l e a n d A d m a t i a n d P f l e i d e r e r b e c a u s e I a s s u m e that the
m a r k e t m a k e r s e l e c t s a s i n g l e p r i c e a f t e r h e h a s o b s e r v e d t h e o r d e r
A t h i r d p o s s i b l e J u s t i f i c a t i o n o f the r a n d o m v a r i a b l e z is to a s s u m e t hat t h e r e is s o m e n o i s e i n the c o m m u n i c a t i o n c h a n n e l b e t w e e n t h e i n f o r m e d s p e c u l a t o r s a n d t h e m a r k e t maker. T h i s m e a n s t h a t t h e ^ m a r k e t m a k e r is o n l y a b l e to o b s e r v e a g a r b l e d o r d e r flow. O b v i o u s l y z m ust be a g a i n u n c o r r e l a t e d to all o t h e r r a n d o m variab l e s .
16
f l o w . 5
G o u l d a n d V e r r e c c h i a (1985) a l t e r t h i s s e q u e n c e o f events. In
t h e i r p a p e r th e m a r k e t m a k e r s e l e c t s the p r i c e f i r s t a n d a f t e r w a r d s the
i n f o r m e d a g e n t s s u b m i t d e m a n d s c o n d i t i o n a l o n p r i c e a n d p r i v a t e
i n f o r m a t i o n 6 .
D i a m o n d a n d V e r r e c c h i a (1987), E a s l e y a n d O ’H a r a (1987) a n d G l o s t e n a n d M i l g r o m (1985) s t u d y the p o s s i b i l i t y o f b i d - a s k s p r e a d s (i.e., a b u y i n g p r i c e a n d a s e l l i n g one) i n a d y n a m i c setup. G l o s t e n a n d Milg r o m , f o r instance, a s s u m e t hat in e a c h p e r i o d o f t i m e t h e r e is o n l y t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of b u y i n g o r s e l l i n g a u n i t o f asset. F r o m t h i s o b s e r v e d b ehavior, the m a r k e t m a k e r i n f e r s p a r t o f the i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d in th e o r d e r f l o w u s i n g u p d a t i n g b a y e s i a n rules. T h e ag e n t w h o s u b m i t s t he ma r k e t o r d e r in e a c h p e r i o d is s e l e c t e d r a n d o m l y a n d c a n be e i t h e r a n i n f o r m e d t r a d e r o r a n o i s e trader. W i t h t h i s s t r u c t u r e t he m a r k e t m a k e r c a n s e l e c t o n l y tw o c o n t i n g e n t p r i c e s (the s e l l i n g p r i c e a n d t he b u y i n g one) b e f o r e t he o r d e r f l o w is o b s erved. F i n a l l y , t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f s e q u e n t i a l l e a r n i n g b y t he m a r k e t m a k e r is n o t a n a l y z e d in o u r (e s s e n t i a l l y ) o n e - p e r i o d model.
6 In G o u l d a n d V e r r e c c h i a (1985) th e a s s u m p t i o n o f r i s k a v e r s i o n c a n n o t b e r e laxed, b e c a u s e t he p r i c e is f i x e d b y th e s p e c i a l i s t f i r s t a n d r i s k n e u t r a l i t y w o u l d le a d i n f o r m e d t r a d e r s to t a k e i n f i n i t e p o s i t i o n s i n t he r i s k y as s e t h e l d by.
17
Th e f o l l o w i n g ta b l e s u m m a r i z e s the s e q u e n c e o f events:
T a b l e 1 — T i m e S t r u c t u r e o f t h e M a r k e t O r d e r s Model
D a t e 1. a) - Th e p u b l i c signal s q= v+ e Q is a n n o u n c e d a n d o b s e r v e d b y everybody.
- T h e i n f o r m e d a g e n t s o b s e r v e s = v + e .
- T h e l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r s o b s e r v e t h e i r f i n a n c i a l n e e d s z .
b) - T h e i n f o r m e d a g e n t s s u b m i t n et d e m a n d s x ( s ,s )
n n 0
co n d i t i o n a l o n p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n to
th e m a r k e t maker.
- T h e l i q u i d i t y t r a d e r s s u b m i t t h e i r n et d e m a n d s z
c) - T h e m a r k e t m a k e r s e l e c t s a p r i c e t hat e q u a t e s the e x p e c t e d r e t u r n c o n d i t i o n a l t o t h e p u b l i c sign a l
a n d t h e o r d e r flow, p= E(v|w, sq ).
d) - T r a n s a c t i o n s a r e c a r r i e d out at t h e p r i c e s e l e c t e d b y the mark e t m a k e r in c). All t h e d e m a n d s are
a b s o r b e d b y the mar k e t maker.
D a t e 2 - Th e r e t u r n v is r e v e a l e d a n d e a c h a g e n t r e c e i v e s this r e t u r n m u l t i p l i e d b y the q u a n t i t y o f a s set
boug h t o n D a t e 1.
2.B. E q u i l i b r i u m .
O n l y i n f o r m e d t r a d e r s m a k e s t r a t e g i c d e c i s i o n s in t h e model.
T h e y w a n t t o m a x i m i z e e x p e c t e d p r o f i t s c o n d i t i o n a l o n t h e i r i nformation.
T h e o p t i m a l d e m a n d f o r r i s k y a s s e t o f i n f o r m e d a g e n t n is
Xn^Sn’ V = argmax E [[^ ~
P
50 j]x |sn>
S0JT h e N a s h e q u i l i b r i u m o f t h e g a m e we a r e s t u d y i n g c o n s i s t s o f N
s t r a t e g i e s ^ ( s ^ , sq ), n = 1 that m a x i m i z e t h e e x p e c t e d p r o f i t s f o r e a c h i n f o r m e d trader, g i v e n t he o b s e r v e d s i gnals, a n d a p r i c e
f u n c t i o n p(w, s q ) that m a k e s the e x p e c t e d p r o f i t s o f t h e m a r k e t m a k e r
e q u a l t o z e r o f o r e a c h p a i r o f p u b l i c s i g n a l a n d o r d e r flow.
I r e s t r i c t a t t e n t i o n to l i n e a r a n d s y m m e t r i c eq u i l i b r i a ,
w h e r e x n C®n . sq ) a n d p(w, sq ) a r e l i n e a r f u n c t i o n s 7 . T h e q u e s t i o n o f e x i s t e n c e o f n o n l i n e a r e q u i l i b r i a in t h i s s e t u p r e m a i n s u n a n s w e r e d but
s e e m s i m p l a u s i b l e u n d e r G a u s s i a n assumpt i o n s .
Th e p r o o f s m a k e e x t e n s i v e u s e o f the f o l l o w i n g l e m m a w h i c h is
a v e r s i o n o f t he p r o j e c t i o n t h e o r e m f o r n o r m a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d r a n d o m
v a r i a b l e s .
7 F o r n o n l i n e a r e q u i l i b r i a u n d e r d i f f e r e n t d i s t r i b u t i o n a l as s u m p t i o n s , s e e G a l e a n d H e l l w i g (1987) a n d L a f f o n t a n d M a s k i n (1988).
19
LEMMA 2.1: Let v, be normally and independently distributed random variables with E(v) = v and E(ufc) = 0 , (k = 1 K) and precisions t^, respectively.
Then:
^Var (v | v + v + u r ) J TV + 2
r , xv v + S T k( v + v
E(*R
*
5*
5
*
5J ^
--Tv * 2 Tk=l k
Proof: It follows from DeGroot (1970, p. 55). Now, I can state now m y first result:
PROPOSITION 2.2: There exists a unique symmetric, linear equilibrium
which is given by
p = p(w, sQ ) = S + A w + yso , and
x = x(s , s ) = a + ,3s + K s , where
20
P ro o f : S e e the appendix. ■
N o t e t hat th e e q u i l i b r i u m c a n be w r i t t e n in t h e f o l l o w i n g way:
[
t v + ts]f
.." V r + x ° = P[ V E(^l^o)J ’
(2>3)
T V + X S
p(w, so ) = + ° ° + A w = E ( v | s q ) + A w . (2.4) v o
T h e q u a n t i t i e s d e m a n d e d b y e a c h a g e n t d e p e n d o n t he d e v i a t i o n
o f t h e p r i v a t e i n f o r m a t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t to th e p o s t e r i o r e x p e c t a t i o n
a f t e r o b s e r v i n g t h e p u b l i c signal. O n t h e o t h e r hand, t h e p r i c e of the
a s s e t w ill be equal to the p o s t e r i o r e x p e c t a t i o n a f t e r o b s e r v i n g s q pl u s
21
a t e r m t hat e m b o d i e s t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d in t h e o r d e r flow.
It is s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d to p r o v e tha t th e u n c o n d i t i o n a l
e x p e c t a t i o n ECx^Cs^, s q )) o f i n d i v i d u a l d e m a n d s is e q u a l to z e r o and,
f r o m this, t h a t E(p(v, s q )) = v, i.e., p r i c e s a r e u n b i a s e d e s t i m a t e s o f returns.
E q u a t i o n (2.3) a n d (2.4) i m p l y t hat a n a l y z i n g the e f f e c t s o f
t h e d i s c l o s u r e o f p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n is a m e q u i v a l e n t p r o b l e m to
s t u d y i n g t h e e f f e c t s o f a r e d u c t i o n in the v a r i a n c e o f the p r i o r
d i s t r i b u t i o n o f v.
T h e c o e f f i c i e n t A in P r o p o s i t i o n 2 . 2 is t h e in v e r s e o f t he
d e p t h of the market, a c c o r d i n g to K y l e ’s (1985) termi n o l o g y . In o t h e r
words, 1/A m e a s u r e s th e o r d e r f l o w r e q u i r e d to c h a n g e t he p r i c e o f t he
r i s k y a s s e t b y o n e dollar. B y inspection, A is d e c r e a s i n g in tq .
T h e r e f o r e the d e p t h o f th e m a r k e t is i n c r e a s i n g i n t q . T h i s r e f l e c t s th e f act that, w h e n m o r e p u b l i c i n f o r m a t i o n is av a i l a b l e , m a r k e t m a k e r ’s
in f e r e n c e s a r e less d e p e n d e n t o n t h e o r d e r flow. T h e n ext s e c t i o n g i v e s
a m o r e d e t a i l e d e x p l a n a t i o n o f th i s impo r t a n t fact.
3. T H E W E L F A R E E F F E C T S O F P U B L I C INFORMA T I O N .
3 . A. F r e e p r i v a t e inform a t i o n .
Th e w e l f a r e e f f e c t s o f p u b l i c d i s c l o s u r e o f i n f o r m a t i o n b y
f i r m s a r e p a r a m e t e r i z e d b y tq . H i g h e r v a l u e s o f t q m e a n m o r e s t r i n g e n t d i s c l o s u r e r e q u i r e m e n t s . O u r a n a l y s i s r e q u i r e s c o m p u t a t i o n o f e x p e c t e d
22
p r o f i t s f o r b o t h t y p e s o f a g e n t s b e f o r e t he r e a l i z a t i o n s o f t h e r a n d o m
v a r i a b l e s a r e o b served.
C O R O L L A R Y 3.1: E x p e c t e d p r o f i t s o f i n f o r m e d t r a d e r s a r e
F o r a l i q u i d i t y c o n s t r a i n e d in d i v i d u a l t r a d e r t (bef o r e h e is
a b l e to o b s e r v e h i s l i q u i d i t y needs), e x p e c t e d p r o f i t s a r e
ECir1) = - AE(z2) =
Proof: F o r t h e i n f o r m e d traders, c o m p u t e
E(7in) = e|\v - p ) x j = e|\v -
S
- Aw - rsQ)(a + + KSQ)jw h e r e w is d e f i n e d i n (2.1) a n d (a, /3, k,5, A, y) a r e g i v e n in P r o p o s i t i o n 2.2.
Fo r the l i q u i d i t y c o n s t r a i n e d t r a d e r s c o m p u t e
E [(v - p)zj =
e[[
v- 5 -
xn
zj - ySQ]zJ
to obtain, a f t e r s o m e algebra, the e x p r e s s i o n s g i v e n in t h e Corollary.