• No results found

Boundary Controllability of Nonlinear Fractional Integrodifferential Systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Boundary Controllability of Nonlinear Fractional Integrodifferential Systems"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

doi:10.1155/2010/279493

Research Article

Boundary Controllability of Nonlinear Fractional

Integrodifferential Systems

Hamdy M. Ahmed

Higher Institute of Engineering, El-Shorouk Academy, P.O. 3 El-Shorouk City, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence should be addressed to Hamdy M. Ahmed,hamdy 17eg@yahoo.com Received 21 July 2009; Accepted 11 January 2010

Academic Editor: Toka Diagana

Copyrightq2010 Hamdy M. Ahmed. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Sufficient conditions for boundary controllability of nonlinear fractional integrodifferential systems in Banach space are established. The results are obtained by using fixed point theorems. We also give an application for integropartial differential equations of fractional order.

1. Introduction

LetEandUbe a pair of real Banach spaces with norms · and| · |, respectively. Letσbe a linear closed and densely defined operator withEand letτXbe a linear operator withandX, a Banach space. In this paper we study the boundary controllability of nonlinear fractional integrodifferential systems in the form

xt

dtα σxt ft, xt t

0

gt, s, xsds, tJ 0, b ,

τxt B1ut,

x0 x0,

1.1

where 0< α≤1 andB1:UXis a linear continuous operator, and the control functionu is given inL1J, U,a Banach space of admissible control functions. The nonlinear operators

f:J×EEandg:Δ×EEare given andΔ:t, s; 0≤stb.

LetA:EEbe the linear operator defined by

DA {x;τx0}, Ax{σx, forxDA}. 1.2

The controllability of integrodifferential systems has been studied by many authorssee1–

(2)

2. Main Result

Definition 2.1. System1.1is said to be controllable on the intervalJif for everyx0, x1 ∈ E there exists a controluL2J, Usuch thatx·of1.1satisfiesxb x

1. To establish the result, we need the following hypotheses.

H1and the restriction ofτ to is continuous relative to the graph norm of.

H2The operatorAis the infinitesimal generator of a compact semigroupTtand there exists a constantM1>0 such thatTtM1.

H3There exists a linear continuous operator B : UE such that σBLU, E,τBu B1u,for alluU.AlsoButis continuously differentiable and

BuCB1ufor alluU,where C is a constant.

H4For all t ∈ 0, b and uU,TtBuDA. Moreover, there exists a positive constantK1>0 such thatATtK1.

H5The nonlinear operatorsft, xtandgt, s, xs, fort, sJ,satisfy

ft, xtL1, gt, s, xsL2, 2.1

whereL1 ≥0 andL2≥0.

H6The linear operatorWfromL2J, UintoEdefined by

Wuα b

0

0

θt−1ξαθTbsαθσATbsαθBusdθ ds, 2.2

where ξαθ is a probability density function defined on 0,∞ see9,10 and induces an invertible operatorW−1 defined onL2J, U/kerW,and there exists a positive constantM2 > 0 andM3 > 0 such thatBM2andW−1 ≤ M3. Let

xtbe the solution of1.1. Then we define a functionzt xtButand from our assumption we see thatztDA. Hence1.1can be written in terms ofA

andBas

dαxt

dtα Azt σBut ft, xt t

0

gt, s, xsds, tJ,

xt zt But, x0 x0.

2.3

Ifuis continuously differentiable on0, b , thenzcan be defined as a mild solution to be the Cauchy problem

zt

dtα Azt σButB ut

dtα ft, xt t

0

gt, s, xsds, tJ,

(3)

and the solution of1.1is given by

xt

0

ξαθTtαθx0−Bu0 dθBut

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθfs, xsdθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθσBusBd αus

dsα dθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθ s

0

gs, τ, xτdτ dθ ds

2.5

see11–13 .

Since the differentiability of the control u represents an unrealistic and severe requirement, it is necessary of the solution for the general inputsuL1J, U.Integrating

2.5by parts, we get

xt

0

ξαθTtαθx0dθα

t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθσATtsαθBusdθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθfs, xsdθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθ s

0

gs, τ, xτdτ dθ ds.

2.6

Thus2.6is well defined and it is called a mild solution of system1.1.

Theorem 2.2. If hypotheses (H1)–(H6) are satisfied, then the boundary control fractional integrodif-ferential system1.1is controllable onJ.

Proof. Using assumptionH6, for an arbitrary functionx·define the control

ut W−1

x1−

0

ξαθTbαθx0α

b

0

0

θb−1ξαθTbsαθfs, xsdθ ds

α b

0

0

θb−1ξαθTbsαθ s

0

gs, τ, xτdτ dθ ds

t.

(4)

We shall now show that, when using this control, the operator defined by

Φxt

0

ξαθTtαθx0

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθσATtsαθBusdθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθfs, xsdθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθ s

0

gs, τ, xτdτ dθ ds

2.8

has a fixed point. This fixed point is then a solution of1.1. Clearly,Φxb x1,which means that the controlusteers the nonlinear fractional integrodifferential system from the initial statex0tox1in timeT, provided we can obtain a fixed point of the nonlinear operator

Φ.

LetY CJ, XandY0{xY :xtr, fortJ},where the positive constantr is given by

r M1x0bαM1σK1 M2M3

x1M1x0M1L1bαM1L21

M1L1bαM1L21.

2.9

ThenY0is clearly a bounded, closed, and convex subset ofY. We define a mappingΦ:Y

Y0by

Φxt

0

ξαθTtαθx0dθα

t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθσATtsαθBW−1

×

x1−

0

ξαθTbαθx0α

b

0

0

θb−1ξαθTbsαθfs, xsdθ ds

α b

0

0

θb−1ξαθTbsαθ s

0

gs, τ, xτdτ dθ ds

sdθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθfs, xsdθ ds

α t

0

0

θt−1ξαθTtsαθ s

0

(5)

Consider

(6)

SinceTtis compact for everyt >0, the setYtxt:xY0}is precompact

which implies thatY0tis totally bounded, that is, precompact inX. We want to show that

(7)

α is an equicontinuous family of functions. Also,ΦY0is bounded inY, and so by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem,ΦY0is precompact. Hence, from the Schauder fixed point inY0,any fixed point ofΦis a mild solution of1.1onJsatisfying

Φxt xtX. 2.16

(8)

3. Application

LetΩ⊂Rnbe bounded with smooth boundaryΓ.

Consider the boundary control fractional integropartial differential system

∂αyt, x

∂tα −Δyt, x F

t, yt, x t

0

Gt, s, ys, xds, inY 0, b×Ω,

yt,0 ut,0 onΣ 0, b×Γ, t∈0, b ,

y0, x y0x, forx∈Ω.

3.1

The above problem can be formulated as a boundary control problem of the form of1.1by suitably taking the spacesE, X, Uand the operatorsB1,σ,andτ as follows.

LetEL2Ω,XH−1/2Γ,UL2Γ,B1I, the identity operator and {y

L2Ω :ΔyL2Ω},σ Δ.The operatorτ is the trace operator such thatτy y|

Γis well

defined and belongs toH−1/2Γfor eachy Dσand the operatorAis given byA Δ,

DA H01Ω∪H2ΩwhereHkΩ, HβΩ,andH01Ωare usual Sobolev spaces onΩ, Γ.

We define the linear operatorB:L2Γ L2ΩbyBuw

uwherewuis the unique solution

to the Dirichlet boundary value problem

Δwu0 in Ω,

wuu inΓ.

3.2

We also introduce the nonlinear operator defined by

ft, xt Ft, yt, x, gt, s, xs Gt, s, ys, x. 3.3

Choose band other constants such that conditions H1–H6 are satisfied. Consequently

Theorem 2.2can be applied for3.1, so3.1is controllable on0, b .

References

1 K. Balachandran and E. R. Anandhi, “Controllability of neutral functional integrodifferential infinite delay systems in Banach spaces,”Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 689–702, 2004.

2 K. Balachandran, J. P. Dauer, and P. Balasubramaniam, “Controllability of nonlinear integrodiff eren-tial systems in Banach space,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 83–91, 1995.

3 K. Balachandran and J. Y. Park, “Existence of solutions and controllability of nonlinear integrodiff er-ential systems in Banach spaces,”Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2003, no. 1-2, pp. 65–79, 2003.

4 R. Atmania and S. Mazouzi, “Controllability of semilinear integrodifferential equations with nonlocal conditions,”Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 2005, no. 75, pp. 1–9, 2005.

5 K. Balachandran and R. Sakthivel, “Controllability of functional semilinear integrodifferential systems in Banach spaces,”Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 255, no. 2, pp. 447– 457, 2001.

(9)

7 K. Balachandran and E. R. Anandhi, “Boundary controllability of integrodifferential systems in Banach spaces,”Proceedings. Mathematical Sciences, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2001.

8 K. Balachandran and A. Leelamani, “Boundary controllability of abstract integrodifferential systems,” Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2003.

9 M. M. El-Borai, “Some probability densities and fundamental solutions of fractional evolution equations,”Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 433–440, 2002.

10 R. Gorenflo and F. Mainardi, “Fractional calculus and stable probability distributions,”Archives of Mechanics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 377–388, 1998.

11 M. M. El-Borai, K. El-Said El-Nadi, O. L. Mostafa, and H. M. Ahmed, “Semigroup and some fractional stochastic integral equations,”The International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2006.

12 M. M. El-Borai, K. El-Said El-Nadi, O. L. Mostafa, and H. M. Ahmed, “Volterra equations with fractional stochastic integrals,”Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2004, no. 5, pp. 453–468, 2004.

References

Related documents

This article shows that the social drive for the development of portable computing came in part from the ‘macho mystique’ of concealed technology that was a substantial motif

You may also need explicit knowledge of how these skills are taught in order to develop inclusive teaching and learning strategies for learners on your courses whose

This subsection considers the strength of opposition toward F/OSS promotion in T2 Brazil, arguing that whilst the software sector reflected organisation and formal links with

The section examines how far appreciation of Romania’s kin-state approach is associated with identification with Romania, to understand whether those already more symbolically

Model results indicate that a sudden load with amplitude of 30kN is sufficient to fully remove thin (10mm) accreted ice on a 300m span. The larger the ice thickness and span

This paper aims at addressing this gap by reviewing the literature on construction process improvement and the software CMM to evaluate the applicability of software

The result is that a majority appears to choose a harmful contract: While the intent-to-treat effect on bank savings for individuals assigned to the treatment group is four times

Another student who did the CACHE course last year, and experienced very great difficulties in completing the written work, told us that she would not have decided to return