• No results found

D R A W I N G B Y J A M E S W A S S E L L

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "D R A W I N G B Y J A M E S W A S S E L L"

Copied!
38
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

D R A W I N G B Y J A M E S W A S S E L L T1 T3 T4 T5 T6 T2

(2)

NATURAL DIVERSITY

NATURAL DIVERSITY

SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIVERSITY TOTAL NATURAL & SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIVERSITY TOTAL NATURAL & SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIVERSITY

EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL THEORY

PROPOSED THEORY II PROPOSED THEORY I

T1

NATURAL

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

DA

(3)

This is non-transect of Conventional Suburban Districts that has been prepared (with malevolent intent) by Dan Zack. [email protected]

(4)
(5)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 Natural Zone Rural Zone Sub-Urban Zone

General Urban Zone

Urban Center Zone

Urban Core Zone

THE PIENZA TRANSECT

(6)

LONDON PARIS NEW ORLEANS W ASHINGT ON SAN FRANCISCO MIAMI R U R A L l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l T R A N S E C l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l U R B A N URBAN CENTER GENERAL

URBAN URBANCORE

SUB-URBAN

(7)

T3- SUB-URBAN TRANSECT

(8)

T4- GENERAL URBAN TRANSECT

(9)

T5- URBAN CENTER TRANSECT

(10)

T6- URBAN CORE TRANSECT

(11)

T3- SUB-URBAN TRANSECT IN BRYTAN, FLORIDA

B R Y T A N , F L O R I D A

© 2000 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: 03-20-01; 2011-Brytan 19

(12)

T4- GENERAL URBAN TRANSECT IN BRYTAN, FLORIDA

B R Y T A N , F L O R I D A

© 2000 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: 03-20-01; 2011-Brytan 18

(13)

T5- URBAN CENTER TRANSECT IN BRYTAN, FLORIDA

B R Y T A N , F L O R I D A

© 2000 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: 03-20-01; 2011-Brytan 16

(14)

T5- URBAN CENTER TRANSECT IN BRYTAN, FLORIDA

B R Y T A N , F L O R I D A

© 2000 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: 03-20-01; 2011-Brytan 17

(15)

T6- URBAN CORE TRANSECT IN BRYTAN, FLORIDA

B R Y T A N , F L O R I D A

© 2000 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: 03-20-01; 2011-Brytan 15

(16)
(17)

REGULATING PLAN TRANSECT IN DOS RIOS, THE PHILLIPINES

(18)

T3- SUB-URBAN TRANSECT IN DOS RIOS, THE PHILLIPINES

(19)

T4- GENERAL URBAN TRANSECT IN DOS RIOS, THE PHILLIPINES

(20)

T5- URBAN CENTER TRANSECT IN DOS RIOS, THE PHILLIPINES

(21)

T O W N O F C O R N E L I U S T O D , N O R T H C A R O L I N A

© 2001 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: JANUARY 2001 Page 6

I L L U S T R A T I V E M A S T E R P L A N

PRESERVED EXISTING TREES PROPOSED TREES

ILLUSTRATIVE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS

ILLUSTRATIVE LOT LINES

(22)

T O W N O F C O R N E L I U S T O D , N O R T H C A R O L I N A

© 2001 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: JANUARY 2001 Page 19

R E G U L A T I N G P L A N 0 200 400 800 T6 TOWN CENTER T5 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER T4 NEIGHBORHOOD GENERAL T3 NEIGHBORHOOD EDGE CB CIVIC BUILDING CS CIVIC SPACE P PARK G GREEN S SQUARE Z PLAZA TERMINATED VISTA

REQUIRED RETAIL FRONTAGE PARKING GARAGE RESERVATION BUILD-TO-LINE THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS CS-70-38: Main Street ST-60-38: Residential Street ST-50-28: Local Street ST-40-18: Small Street SQ-40-19: Square Drive PK-40-28: Parkway Drive AL-20: Alley LA-24-14: Lane PA-20-8: Path CB TRANSECT ZONES

Note: For detailed regulations on the transect zones see Urban Standards.

(23)

T O W N O F C O R N E L I U S T O D , N O R T H C A R O L I N A

© 2001 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: JANUARY 2001 Page 8

(24)

T O W N O F C O R N E L I U S T O D , N O R T H C A R O L I N A

© 2001 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: JANUARY 2001 Page 9

(25)

T O W N O F C O R N E L I U S T O D , N O R T H C A R O L I N A

© 2001 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: JANUARY 2001 Page 10

(26)

T O W N O F C O R N E L I U S T O D , N O R T H C A R O L I N A

© 2001 Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

Revision Date: JANUARY 2001 Page 11

(27)

Charleston, SC

T3

Sub-Urban Zone

South Battery Street and Limehouse Street Spatial Section Typical Sub-Urban Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street

Movement slow

Moving Lanes two

Parking Lanes two

Width 30’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb

Walk type sidewalk

Planter type NA

Walk Width 8’

Planting Type tall canopy tree

Planter Width NA

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 46’

BUILDING

Type patio house

Frontage common lawn

Height three to four stories

Setback 15’-20’

(28)

Charleston, SC

T4

Urban General Zone

Logan Street & Queen Street Spatial Section Typical Urban General Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street

Movement slow

Moving Lanes two

Parking Lanes one

Width 28’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb

Walk type sidewalk

Planter type planting strip

Walk Width 6’

Planting Type tall canopy tree

Planter Width 2’

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 44’

BUILDING

Type single house

Frontage stoop

Height three stories

Setback 0’

(29)

Charleston, SC

T5

Urban

C

enter Zone

Wentworth Street and Pitt Street looking East Spatial Section Typical Urban Center Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street

Movement medium

Moving Lanes two

Parking Lanes two

Width 28’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb

Walk type sidewalk

Planter type treewell

Walk Width 7’

Planting Type tall canopy tree

Planter Width NA

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 42’

BUILDING

Type edge/sideyard

Frontage storefront/stoop

Height three stories

Setback 0’

(30)

Charleston, SC

T6

Urban Core Zone

King Street looking South Spatial Section Typical Urban Core Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street

Movement slow

Moving Lanes one

Parking Lanes one

Width 25’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb

Walk type sidewalk Planter type hanging plant

Walk Width 8’

Planting Type hanging plants

Planter Width NA

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 42’ BUILDING

Type commercial

Frontage storefront Height three-four stories

Setback 0’

(31)

Albuquerque, NM

T3

Sub-Urban Zone

Guadalupe Lane looking West Spatial Section Typical Sub-Urban Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type rural road

Movement yield

Moving Lanes one

Parking Lanes none

Width 15’

STREETSCAPE

Edge open swale

Walk type none

Planter type continuous planter

Walk Width NA

Planting Type single species

Planter Width 5’

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 25’ BUILDING

Type edge yard/rear yard Frontage forecourt

Height one story

Setback 7’-22’

(32)

Albuquerque, NM

T4

Gold Ave. Looking East Street Plan/Section

Scale: 1”=20’-0” Typical Urban General Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street Movement free Moving Lanes one Parking Lanes two Width 32’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb Walk type sidewalk Planter type continuous

Walk Width 6’ Planting Type single species Planter Width 7’ TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 58’

BUILDING

Type edge yard/rear yard Frontage enclosed porch/forecourt

Height one story Setback 9’-14’ TOTAL SPATIAL WIDTH 58’-81’

(33)

Albuquerque, NM

T5

San Felipe Street Looking North Street Plan/Section

Scale: 1”=20’-0” Typical Urban Center Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street Movement yield Moving Lanes one Parking Lanes one

Width 26’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb Walk type sidewalk Planter type separate planter

Walk Width 7’ Planting Type single species Planter Width 2’ TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 40’

BUILDING

Type rear yard Frontage gallery and forecourt

Height one-two stories Setback 7’ TOTAL SPATIAL WIDTH 5’-9’

(34)

Albuquerque, NM

T6

Broughton Street looking East Street Plan/Section

Scale: 1”=20’-0” Typical Urban Core Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type commercial street Movement free Moving Lanes two Parking Lanes two Width 46’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb Walk type wide sidewalk Planter type treewell

Walk Width 18’

Planting Type single species/post Planter Width 5’

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 92’

BUILDING

Type rear yard/flexhouse Frontage shopfront/forecourt

Height 2-3 stories Setback 0’-8’ TOTAL SPATIAL WIDTH 92’

(35)

New Orleans, LA

T3

Sub-Urban Zone

Reynolds Street & 45th Street looking East Spatial Section Typical Sub-Urban Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street

Movement 30 MPH

Moving Lanes two

Parking Lanes 1+ Width 18’ STREETSCAPE Edge no curb Walk type NA Planter type NA Walk Width NA Planting Type NA Planter Width NA

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 18’

BUILDING

Type residential

Frontage 75’

Height 1-2 stories

Setback 30’

(36)

New Orleans, LA

T4

Chaleston Street & Lincoln Street looking East Street Plan/Section

Scale: 1”=20’-0” Typical Urban General Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type

Movement slow Moving Lanes one Parking Lanes two

Width 26’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb Walk type sidewalk Planter type NA

Walk Width 4’ Planting Type grass Planter Width 6’ TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 48’

BUILDING

Type residential Frontage stoop

Height two stories Setback 16’ TOTAL SPATIAL WIDTH 80’

(37)

New Orleans, LA

T5

Abercorn Street & Oglethorpe Street looking North Street Plan/Section

Scale: 1”=20’-0” Typical Urban Center Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street

Movement slow

Moving Lanes one

Parking Lanes one

Width 30’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb

Walk type sidewalk

Planter type boxed

Walk Width 14’

Planting Type trees

Planter Width 3’

TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 58’

BUILDING

Type mixed use

Frontage 20’-40’

Height two stories

Setback 0’

(38)

New Orleans, LA

T6

Broughton Street looking East Street Plan/Section

Scale: 1”=20’-0” Typical Urban Core Area

THOROUGHFARE

Type street Movement slow Moving Lanes one Parking Lanes one Width 22’

STREETSCAPE

Edge raised curb Walk type sidewalk Planter type NA

Walk Width 8’ Planting Type NA Planter Width NA TOTAL R.O.W. WIDTH 38’

BUILDING

Type mixed use Frontage storefront Height 2-3 stories Setback 0’ TOTAL SPATIAL WIDTH 38’

References

Related documents

Thus, a physiotherapy program based on manual therapy may be safe in patients with hemophilia and inhibitor and such therapy may improve joint condition, pain, and joint range of

We performed this study to investigate potential risk factors for increased utilization of special educational (SE) services, as a proxy for developmental delays, among offspring

Percent of humeral head anterior to scapular line (PHHA), glenoid version, coracoscapular angles, and coracoscapular and coracohumeral distances were significantly lower for

There were 20 candidate items for the questionnaire (Table 2), all taken from the Japanese Orthopaedic Asso- ciation Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), a

AO: Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen; CMS: Coleman Methodology Scoring; DI: Deep Infection; KOOS: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; LOE: Level of Evidence;

As the result of the current study showing that distance on longitudinal axis between the weighted center and the geometric center of the nucleus pulposus in Pfirrmann Grade II

Physicians almost universally endorse cancer screening [19]. However, high rates of physician recommendations for screening are not supported by either chart docu- mentation [20]

Class Formation," Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wright, Erik Olin.. December 3, 1987 Eric Hobsbawmls Visit. The Historical Formation