Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections
2004
The Persuasive Image
George D. Grove
Follow this and additional works at:http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended Citation
THE PERSUASIVE IMAGE
The Anti-Suburbia Series IX
Graduate Thesis Master of Fine Arts
School of Photographic Arts and Sciences Rochester Institute of Technology
By George Dudley Grove
Spring 2004
The following members of my Thesis Board Committee accept this written thesis as the completion of a Master of Fine Arts Degree in Photography:
Elaine O'Neil, Thesis Committee Chair, Professor, CIAS- Fine Art Photography
Date I
I
;>or
o~
I
Dan Larkin, Assistant Professor, CIAS- Fine Art Photography
Date /
hbfr'(
Alex Miokovic, Assistant Professor, CIAS-Art History
THE PERSUASIVE IMAGE
The Anti-Suburbia Series IX
Graduate Thesis
Master of Fine Arts in Imaging Arts - Fine Art Photography School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
College of Imaging Arts and Sciences Rochester Institute of Technology
By George Dudley Grove
Spring 2004
Thesis Author Pennission Statement:
I, George Grove, understand that I must submit a print copy of my thesis to the RIT Archives, per current RIT guidelines for the completion of my degree. I hereby grant to the Rochester Institute of Technology and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis in whole or in part in all forms of media in perpetuity. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of my thesis.
Print Reproduction Permission Granted:
I, George Dudley Grove, hereby grant permission to the Rochester Institute of
Technology to reproduce my thesis in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not for commercial use or profit.
DEDICATION:
Iwouldliketo thankmyfamily,friends, andfellowgraduatestudentsfortheirsupport,ideas, and
assistancein mywork. Ialso wouldliketothanktheparticipantsintheprojectforlivingwithmy
images foran extended period oftimeandfillingoutthesurveys. Fortheirdirectionandmotivation,
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. HISTORY OF SUBURBIA 3
ffl. COMMUNITY 12
IV. INFLUENCES 17
PropagandaandtheAnti-Suburbanists TheHarrisons
PerformanceArt
CognitiveDissonance Effect
V. THESIS SUMMARY 33
VI. EXPERIMENT 34
Hypothesis
Methods
Results
Conclusion
VII. CONCLUSION 38
VHI. APPENDICES 39
Survey
The
Persuasive
Image
L INTRODUCTION
Theunfortunate suburban migration continues. These newlyarrived suburbanites exchangetheir
multidimensionalurbancityviews forthoseof acarefullyconstructed andintenselycontrolled pastoral view. Thisviewfromtheirwindowsisonethatsymbolizestheirownershipofthelandandtheir freedom from denseurbanlivingconditions. Theopen space and grassfunctionaspowerful reminders ofwhytheylive insuburbia.Butwhat would occurifthesuburbanites weretoexchangetheirview of plasticEdenwithimagesfromthecity? What iftheview oftheiraltered yards andobsessively
manicured gardens wereintentionallyreplaced with views of urbanlandscapes? Whatifan urban view weretobeelevated and aestheticized untilitwaspresentedas abeautifulobjecttobecoveted and
desired? Severalpsychologicaltheories,andinparticulartheCognitive DissonanceEffect,suggest suburbanites could changetheirattitude abouttheirlivingconditionsinthesuburbs with respecttothe
city.
Thegoalofthis thesisistoprovide anexperiencethroughwhich a changeintheattitudesof
suburbanitesregardinglivinginanurbanenvironmentmight occur. Thethesisis morethanjustimages, but is actuallyan attempttoexplore, measure,andquantifytheattitudinal change oftwoexperimental populationswhentheyareexposedtothesame simulatedcityview(Figure 1). One group lived inthe cityofRochesterproperwithina mile ofthecenter ofthe city,whiletheotherlivedoutside ofthecity,
severalmilesaway.
MyThesis Exhibitionwas part ofthedocumentationof a performancethatoccurredinprivate
Figure 1.
Inmuchof performance artfromthe70'sonward,thephotograph wasonly atooltodocumentthe performanceortodisseminatetheperformancetoan audience. Thisproject utilizesthephotographina
very differentmanner,asthe photographIStheperformance. Occurringoveralimitedduration,the
audienceisindailyand unavoidable contact withtheimageandisaffectedbyitspresence. Ratherthan
using photographytodocumenttheperformance, thedocumentationisthroughtheattitudinalchange
registeredinthepre-and post-performance surveys.
The imageschosenforthisexhibition weretakenfromapartments and residences offriendsand
acquaintancesinChicago,NewYork, and other cities. Theirfunctionistoimpartafeelingoflocation
andplace, toimplythat thevieweris livinginthecity. InitiallyIbelievedthat theimagecontent was
relativelyunimportant,aslongasitconveyed"cityness." However, afterphotographingtherearof
apartmentbuildings,I graduallyenlargedthecontenttoinclude facadesthatemployedtheirarchitectural
beautyas an additional aspect ofthepersuasion. UltimatelyfortheprojectIchoosetouse a single
expansiveviewforall oftheresidenceswheretheimageencompassedbothlowerandhigherdensity
dwellings,containing bothaneighborly feelwhileremindingtheviewerthatoneisstillinthecity.
Thisthesisdocumented how photographycanbeutilizedtochange perceptionsand viewpoints about
theworldaroundus. Itis hopedthiswork canhelpleadpeopletotherealizationthat themodelforthe
H. HISTORY OF SUBURBIA
Today,suburbiacontinuestogrow at atremendouspace,chokinganddevouringthelandscape,
as well asthelivesofthefamilies andindividuals,who aretrappedwithin an isolatedand
definedenvironmentlackingvital andnecessaryaspects which meet ourhumanneedsas social
animals. Theisolationleadstofeelingsoflonelinessanddespairthatare muchdeeperandmore
commonin Americathaninother
societies.1
American'srelationto thelandhasundergonedrasticchangeinthepast severalhundredyears.
The first Englishcolonistsbelievedwilderness was evil and savagebecausetheywereusedto
cultivation and controloftheirlandscapes. Eventhegardens and parks oftheEnglishwere
extremely formal and manicuredtoreflectthisbelief:theshrubs andbushesweretightly
trimmedand sculpted andthegrass wasevenlycutinadomineeringmanner. Thecolonists
brought many ideasofthelandscapewiththem,manyoftheseare still apparentin America
today,althoughtheyhaveevolved and mutated overtime. Whenthenewcountry begantoform
anationalidentity,thelandscapewasone oftheidealmetaphors. Theincrediblemountains, vast
forests,giganticfreshwaterlakes,andtheunfathomableWestall combinedtoreinforcethe
nation's pride and sense of self. Sharpdescribes itas, "Insum,atopographyof awesome
dimensions andlimitlessnaturalbounty,singled outfor divineblessing,haslongbeen integralto
thenational
consciousness."2
Throughoutthenineteenthcenturythevastness and magnificence
oftheAmerican landscapewas extolled notonly in literatureandmusic,butalsobynumerous
painters andphotographerswhowere mesmerizedbyits beauty. FrederickChurchandThomas
Coleare painters who showedthisworship in imagesofNew YorkStatemountains and
wildernesses(Figures 2and3). Coincidingwiththewestwardexpansionandoccupation, a
whole new generation of artistswas enthralled. These includedthefamoustopographic
photographersofthegovernmentsurveyingmissions ofTimothy O'
Sullivan,CarletonWatkins,
WilliamHenryJackson,AndrewRussell,andJohn Hillers (Figure 4). Theyexploredthevirgin
continent'scompellingbeautyusing largeglass plate negativeswhichhadtobeprepared and
developedonthespot. ArtcriticAndyGrundbergdescribesthework oftheseWestern
landscapephotographersas "O'
Sullivanorganizedthesescenesintopictures ofconsiderable
1
HerbertJ.Gans,The Levittowners: Ways ofLifeandPolitics inaNew SuburbanCommunity,p.230. 2
Figure 2.
Figure3.
[image:11.545.58.490.48.338.2]Figure 4.
Andrew J. Russell. HangingRock,RoofofEchoCanyon, Utah, 1867-68. Albumin Print Naomi
force,andina mannerthatradicallyextendsour conception of what alandscapecanbe. Like
Wafkins,andto some extentEadweard MuybridgeandWilliam
HenryJacksonaswell,
O'
Sullivanimbued hispictures oftheAmerican Westwith a profound skepticism aboutMan's
relationtoNature. Natureseemsnot so muchdispassionate inhispictures asapassionate, remotefromman's wishes andintentions."3(Figure5) Theseimageshelped fuelthefrenzyfor
ManifestDestinywhichdeemeditwasevery American's inalienableright,evendestiny
(especiallythosewith power ormoney)toconquer andtame thenewland inthenameof
America.
Forinhabitantsofnewlyindustrializedcities, thedramaticnatural scenesthatwerebeing
producedeffectedthemsignificantly. Sharpdescribedtherelationshipas,"escapistimages borderingonthesublime."4
However,even asthepublic wasincorporatingtheseimages into their psyche, thewildernessthatwasbeingdepictedwasrapidly undergoingatransformation. "Untamednature wasbeginningtogivewayto small settlements andfarms. Thewidespread
levelingofforests,theready availabilityof prairieland forhomesteading,thesudden contraction
ofthe continent,acceleratedin 1869bytheadvent ofthe transcontinental railroad,mining for gold andsilver,wereonlyafewofthecauses ofthedisappearance."5
Theimages, however,continuedtoworktheirway intotheconsciousness anddesiresof
everyone. Popularcultureimageswereextremelypersuasivein howthelandand nature were
ideallyviewed and people wantedtocapture a part ofthisvision aroundtheirhomes. Insteadof
lookingto thenatural world asthewaytodesignayard, thenaiveinhabitantslooked backto theirEuropeanroots.
While many historians havetreatedsuburbiaas arecentphenomenon,it actually hasancient
roots,andhasbeenpresentfromtheorigins of thecity itself. Onlyrecently itistheincredible
growththathaspermittedthesuburbs todwarfthecitiesinpopulation as well as areathatmakes
thischapter unique. Theancientcities ofMesopotamiaandEgyptoftenhadadense citycore,
butthenhadlessdense 'suburbs'
outsidethecityperimeterandbeyond. Thearcheologist
3
AndyGrundberg,CrisisoftheReal: WritingsonPhotography1974-198,p.58.
4
Figure 5.
LeonardWoolleyfoundevidence ofbuildingsoutside ofUrasfarasfourmilesawayfromthe
urban
center.6
Thereisan example ofthenaturalinteractionbetweenandinterdependence
betweenthecities andthesurroundingrural and agricultural lands fortradeand resources.
Duringlaterperiodsspacelimitations inthecities promoted growth attheperipheries such as
whenbuildingsand structures were erectedthatexceededthespaceavailable, itwas naturalfor
themtolookto themargins. SothelocationofthegymnasiumsinancientGreeceandthe
monasteriesduringmedieval ages issimilarto thewaythat theSuper-Walmarts
mustnowlocate
attheperipheryoftoday'scommunitiesdueto theirsize requirements.
Butspacelimitationsare nottheprimary factor behindthegrowth ofthemodern suburbs. In
ancientRomethewealthycreatedcountryvillasand estatesfortheirsocial status as well as
relaxation, pleasure,health benefits. Laterpeoples continuedtofollowthis trendasthehistorian
Lewis MumforddescribedthelayoutofMedievalcities ashaving"detailedevidence oflittle
huts,cottages,andvillas,with amplegardens,springing upoutsidethecitieswalls. Bythe
sixteenthcenturythelandso used servedformorethansummer residence andrecreation. As
earlyasthe thirteenth century,indeed,Villanireportedthattheland fora circle ofthree miles
aroundFlorencewas occupiedbyrichestates withcostlymansions; andVenetianfamilieswere
notbehind intheirvillas ontheBrenta."7 Buttheseestates werenotforthecommonfolk,and
Mumforddescribesthemas"Fromthebeginning,theprivileges anddelightsofsuburbanism
were reservedlargelyfortheupperclass; sothat thesuburb might almostbe describedasthe
collective urbanformofthecountryhouse-thehouse inthepark-asthesuburban
wayoflife is
solargelyaderivativeoftherelaxed, playful,goods-consumingaristocraticlifethatdeveloped
o
out ofthe rough,bellicose, strenuous existence ofthefeudal stronghold."
In Alberti'sseminalworkThe Ten Books ofArchitecture, he discussesthesecountryestates
sayingthat"thereisa vastdealof satisfactioninaconvenient retreat nearthetown,where a man
isatlibertytodo justwhathepleases ... Iwouldhavethefrontandwholebodyofthehouse
5
Sharp,p.15. 6
Leonard Wooley. ExcavationsatUr:A Record of TwelveYears'Wort
7
Lewis Mumford. TheCityin History: itsOrigins, itsTransformations,anditsProspects,p.484. 8
perfectlywelllighted,andthatit beopentoreceive a greatdealoflightandsun, anda sufficient
quantityof wholesome
air."9
"Thoughtheretreatfromthecityheldmanifest advantageforhealthandfamilylife,itwas
equallyanattempttoachieveliberation fromthesometimesdrearyconventions and compulsions
of anurbansociety: aneffort, giventhenecessaryfinancialmeans, tohavelifeon one's own
terms,evenifitmeanthavingitalone:theanarchism of the wellfilledpurse, theheresyofthe
privateindividual's seekingto takeover withinthelimitsof a privatefamilythefunctionsof a
whole
community."10
"To beyour own uniqurself; tobuildyour uniquehouse,mid a uniquelandscape: tolive inthis
DomainofArnheima self-centeredlife,inwhich privatefantasyand caprice wouldhave license
toexpressthemselves openly,inshort, towithdrawlikea monk andlive likeaprince-thiswas
thepurposeoftheoriginal creators ofthesuburb. Theyproposedineffect o create anasylum,in
whichtheycould,asindividuals,overcomethechronicdefectsof civilization while still
commandingat willtheprivilegesandbenefitsof urban society. ThisUtopia provedtobe,upto
apoint,a realizable one: soenchantingthat thosewho contrivedit failedto seethefatal penalty
attachedtoit-the
penaltyofpopularity, thefatal inundationofa massmovement whosevery
numbers would wipe outthegoods eachindividualsoughtfor hisowndomesticcircle,and,
worse,replacethemwith alifethatwas notevenacheapcounterfeit,butratherthegrim
antithesis."11
Withthegrowth oftheindustrialrevolution andtheexponentialincreaseinthe grime, soot, and
smogofthe cities, thehealth benefitsoftherurallife becamemore apparent anddesirable. As
road networksbecamemoreefficient, thecitiesbegananotherstageofgrowththatwasravenous
in itsappetiteforland. Theupperclasseswerethefirsttoleavethe cities,echoingatrendfrom
the 18thand 19th
centuries whentheyhadrural estates within aday'sjourneyoftheurbanarea.
Withtheadvent oftherailroadand masstransit,theseareas andbeyondwere nowavailabletoa
farbroaderpopulation. Withthevastly decreasedtraveltimes,itwaspossibletocommuteto
9
Leone Battista Alberti. Ten BooksonArchitecture,p 1 14. 10
workeachdayandthesurroundinglands became feasibleto themiddle class.RogerSilverstone,
theeditorofVisions ofSuburbia, illustratesthechangethat therailroadhadon suburbanEngland
with"Bromleyisa caseinpoint. Halfaday'shorseridefrom London and once a manor ofthe
bishopsofRochester,itwassuburbanized,unexceptionally. . . withitspopulation
quadrupling
inthelastfortyyears ofthenineteenthcentury,followingthearrivalin 1858oftherailway,
whichbroughtthecentre ofthegrowingtown to aroundtwentyminutesfrom Cannon Street in
theCityofLondon. Bromley. . . likeso
manytownsand villages ofthetimeand equivalent
distancefromLondon,quicklysuccumbedtomorespeculative,unplanned
development."12
In Americathisrapid expansion was also assistedbyTheodore Rooseveltandhis New Dealthat
"after 1932encouragedthethirty-yearmortgagethatmadehome ownership feasibletomany
working-classfamilieseventhoughfewcould availthemselvesofituntil aftertheSecond World
War. Rooseveltsupportedhighwayconstructionthatlaidthefoundationof modern suburban
sprawl. In 1939,Rooseveltsignedlegislationthatofferedtaxdeductionsonmortgageinterest,
thusprovidinga majorsubsidytosuburbanization. From 1934-1953theAmericansuburban
population roseby75percent(comparedtoonly 25% forthecountryas a
whole)."13
Astheirnewlivingenvironmentbecamemorecommon,it begantoberepresentedinpopular
culturein "memorablepostwar americanfilms,Miracleon 34th
Street,Mr.BlandingBuilds his
DreamHome,and evenIt'saWonderful Lifeprovidedavisualimageofthepopulardreamofa
suburban
home."14
Nowpartofthe"AmericanDream"
wastoown ahomewith a yardthat
surroundedit,no matterhowtinyandinefficientitwas. Withtheend ofWWII signaling
nationalrecovery, theGI BillwiththeVeteransAdministrationandFHAmortgageinsurance
programs,andtheadventofLevittown,NJ,even thelowermiddle classcouldafforda sectionof
thisgrassy dream.
Itisinterestingtonotethat thefirst Levittown includedaspects ofcommunity in itsdesign,but
theseaspects werede-emphasizedinthelatertwoLevittowns. Sociologist HerbertGans,who
studiedtheLevittowninhabitants,describedtheinitialversionas a
"
. . . smallerversion ofthe
11
Mumford,p.486. 10_
11
Mumford,p.486. 12
RogerSilverstone. Visions ofSuburbia,p.3. 13
Silverstone,p.119. 14
expensivesuburban onestheLevitt firm had builtpreviously,but includedanarrayofhome
appliancesand werelocatedaroundVillage Greens thatconsisted of neighborhoodshops,an
playgroundand aswimming
pool."15
Thefirmwas initiallyoperatedbyAbrahamLevittandhis
twosonsWilliamandAlfred. Alfredwas trainedinarchitecture and was astrongproponentfor
communitycenteredbuilding,which canbeseenfromsome ofhisother projects. Togetherwith
the executives,theywere"dividedintotworelativelystablefactions, theself-styled"idealists"
whowantedtobuildwhattheyconsideredthebestpossiblecommunity,andthe"realists",
concentratedmainlyinthecomptroller'soffice,who were concerned witheconomyand
sometimesquestionedinnovationsthatmightincreasecostsoraffect
sales."16
Unfortunately,
whenAlfredleftthefirm,hisbrother Williamwasleftincontrol,so muchofthepushtowards
creating community disappeared. Gans describes William'sviewpointsas"unlikehisfather,he
hadnodesiretoinvolvethefirminthelifeofthecommunityortouplifttheculturalleveland
civicperformanceofthe
residents."17
Hefeltthat"mostofthebuyersweremovingtoLevittown
1 ft only becauseofthehouseandhad little interest inthewider
community."
Outsidecompetition
from shoppingcenters also erodedtheabilityoftheLevittiowntosupportitsown shops and
attractions,withtheresultbeingthatthelater Levittowns included lessofthem,andtheresult
wastheywere muchless communityoriented.
Withthenowaffordablesuburbsgrowing rapidly (20%growthbetween 1950and1956alone!),
theywerefilled mostlybythemiddle-classinhabitantsoftheurbancities. Thisresultedinwhat
Paul Grogancharacterizesas amulti-wave assault ontheurbanfabric. The firstofthese:
"ismiddle-classflight. Wheretheaginginfrastructureof old cities and the
newer,lower-costamenities ofthesuburbs propelthemiddle classesfartherand
farthertowardthesuburbanhorizon. Amiddle-class consumertastefor detached
houses,largerlots,and(atleast amongwhites) homogenousracial and ethnic environmentsacceleratestheflight. Themovetothesuburbs was almost
self-generating. As largernumbers ofaffluent citizens movedout,jobs followed. In
turn,thisattracted morefamilies,moreroads,and moreindustries. ...Highquality
municipal services,andespeciallywell-funded public schoolsthatoffered racial
15
Larrabee,Eric."TheSix Thousand HousesthatLevittBuilt,"
Harper'sMagazine,Vol.197 (September
1948),pp.79-88.
16
Gans,p.7.
17
Gans,p.6. 18
homogeneityandharmony,attracted still moreresidents,whichinturnmade select suburbs even wealthier and more attractive. As earlyasthe 1950's,
suburban real-estate advertisements wereharpingonthe themesofrace, crime,
drugs,congestion,andfilth."19
"SinceWorld War JJauto-centric policieshaveerodedthenations publictransportation agencies,
nowreceivingone governmentdollarforeverysevenhandedto thecar."20
"Withthefederal
governmentfinancing90percent oftheinterstatesystem, thenationtook to thehighways,and
themovingvansheadedto thehills."21
Thusthedream didnottakeintoaccounttheinteractionsbetweeninhabitants,asthedesign
centeredon eachfamilyunit andtheirowndesires. Theneighborhood wasdesignedto
efficiently divideupa parcel ofland intoyardswitheasyaccessforavehicle,hencethename
"subdivision."
Thepedestrian wasusually ignoredor evendiscouraged,andit iscommonto
findsubdivisionsbeingconstructedtodaywithoutsidewalks,therebydiscouraginginteraction
amongtheinhabitants. Interactionislimitedtoseeingone'sneighborsdrivepasttoandfrom
work. Thistakes toan unnatural extreme whatGeorge Simmel describes as"oneofthelarge
developmentaltendenciesof sociallife... a small circlefirmlyclosedagainstneighboring
circles."22
"Itappearsthat theplanningaxiomistomakeitasconvenientas possiblefor
cars. Thearrangement ofhomes,schools,libraries, businesses,andshopping is
intentionallyorganized sothatnoneofit isaccessibleinsuburbiawithout
automobiles. Itisverycar-friendly,butnot at allpeople-friendly. The
preeminent value upheldbyplanningbymostAmericancommunitiesisthat
whatever allows more carsto travelgreaterdistances faster isgoodplanning. The
cloggedhighways,theneighborhoodswithoutsidewalks, theacres ofblack
asphaltbakinginthesummersun,theperiodic poisonousair,theenormousland
consumption anddestruction, andtheinabilitytowalk anywherethatmattersare
not goodforpeoplelivingorunborn, andthesethingsmake communitiesaplace
nearly impossibleto
develop."23
19
Paul GroganandTonyProscio,Comeback Cities: A Blueprintfor Urban NeighborhoodRevival,p.35.
20
JaneHoltzKay,AsphaltNation: HowtheAutomobile Took Over AmericaandHowWe Can Take It
Back,p.44. 21
Kay,p.21.
22
Currently,the trendofsuburbanizationcontinues, butsome arestartingtoquestionthe
relationship. Theywonderwhyso much oftheirproperty iscoveredwithgrass,and are even
questioning ifa yardis integraltomodern-daysatisfaction, orif it detracts fromtheirqualityof
life. Theyseetheabandonment anddecayoftheold cities in favorofbuildinganew atthe
outskirts,and recognizethewaste and cometo theconclusionthat:
"Thebiggestenvironmentaldebacle isnot contaminatedindustrialsites,poor air
quality,wetlandsdestruction,or radioactivewaste;ratheritistheprodigal waste
ofexistinginfrastructurecombined withthe simultaneousinvestmentinnew
infrastructureonthefringesof a region.. . we abandon an
existing investmentand thenreplicatethewholethingsomewhere else. Yetall ofthoseabandoned or
underutilizedstreets,sewerpipes, waterlines,utilities,sidewalks,business
blocks,andindustrialfacilities,schools,houses,and neighborhoods represent an
extraordinary investment inbothrenewable and non-renewableresources, the
energytomakethem,andthe tremendoushuman laborrequiredtobuildthem. Howcanweclaimtobeenvironmentallyresponsible andbehaveinsuch a
profligate
manner?"24
Eventuallythis scenarioistoberepeatedinreverseinthesuburbs. The aging infrastructure in
thesuburbs willbegintobeadrainonthecommunityas a result ofthesprawling design. I
estimatethat therewillbemuchhigher infrastructurerepairand maintenance costs per unit
dwelling,perhapsbyafactorof one-hundred. Thus,as thesesuburbs age pasttheir tenthdecade,
theunbearabletaxburdenwillhopefullyencouragetheinhabitantstorelocateintheurban
centers ratherthanmoving furtherouttoanewersuburb.
"Mostpeoplelookupon ourhighwaysystem as a goodthing,takingpridein its
width,length,appearance,and efficiency. Ialso assumethatmost people are
unaware oftheconsequencesthesystemhas hadonthedevelopmentofsuburbia,
onthereduction anddeteriorationofotherformsof publictransportation,andon
theacceleration ofthedecayof anddisorganizationinthecentral city. Thatisto
say,most people whotakeprideinour modernhighwaysystemcannotsee a
relationship between itandtheircomplaintsabouttheabsence of apsychological sense of
community."2
23
Dr. RobertArchibald, "Whose Planis itAnyway?"
PublicPolicyResearch Center OccasionalPaper5
(June,2002),p.5. 24
Archibald,p.4. 25
Seymour B.Sarason, The Psychological Sense of Community: ProspectsforaCommunityPsychology,p.
The biggest lossfromthegrowth ofsuburbiaisthelossof community.Freuddescribes how
humanneeds areignoredin societyas,"wejustlyfind faultwiththepresent state of our
civilizationforsoinadequately fulfillingourdemands fora plan oflifethatshall make us
happy."26
26
m. COMMUNITY
Whatisthedefinitionof community? Sarason definesitas"thesensethatonebelongs inandis
meaningfullya partof alargercollectivity, andthatthereisa network of and structureto the
relationshipsthatdiminishesratherthanincreasesthefeelingsofloneliness."27 Hegoes ontoinclude in
hissense of acommunity, "a readilyavailable,mutuallysupportive network of relationships upon which
one coulddepend, and as a result ofwhich,onedidnot experience sustainedfeelingsoflonelinessthat
impelonetoactions ortoadoptinga style oflivingmasking anxietyandsettingthestagefor laterand
moredestructive
anguish."28
'Weneedtofeelneeded. Weyearntobepart of alargernetwork of relationshipsthatwould give
greaterexpressiontoour needsforintimacy, diversity,usefulness, andbelonging."29 Itisthisneedfor
belongingthathascausedtheretobesuch a"powerfulaffiliativedrivedrawingmen and womaninto
religiouscongregations,fraternallodges,ethnicorganizations,sportsclubs,reformgroups,
mutual-improvementjuntas,professionalsocieties,civicassociations,andcommunalliving
ventures."30
It just
takesalookat"the divorcerate,thedecliningforceofinstitutionalizedreligion,high-riseliving
quarters,changingneighborhoods,and afantasticrateof moving. Itisnowonderthat theabsenceof a
stabilizingsenseofcommunity has beenpinpointedasoneofthemostfrequentand significantfeatures
of our
society."31
Unfortunately,today'ssuburbancommunities arenotformedbytheaccumulatedknowledgeof
psychologists, sociologists,urbanplanners,economists,andtheinhabitants,asitshouldbe,butbythe
developerswho are motivatedbyshorttermprofit. Theydonotcare abouttheinhabitantslongterm
happinessafterthehouseissold.32
B.F.Skinner,thepioneeringpsychologistwho madesome ofthe
firstbreakthroughs into human behaviorandpsychology,alsocalledfor "achangedrelationship
betweenpsychologyand society,betweentheoryandaction, andbetween scienceandsocial
responsibility."33
Hewantedtoaltersocietyby havingitsmembers attain apsychological sense of
27
Sarason, p.41. 28
Sarason. p. 1. 29
Sarason, p.3. 30
DonaldPitzer,America's CommunalUtopias,p. 1 1. 31
Sarason, p. 154. 32
Gans,p.7. 33
community. AccordingtoSkinner,thisispossiblebygivingthewelfare ofthecommunityprecedence
overthatoftheindividual.
Whatmakes a good community? Keyelements of astrong communityarethesense ofbelongingand
thesecuritythatresultsfromknowingandinteractingwith your neighbors. Neighborswhich makeup
themodern equivalent ofthehistorictribe. Thoughoutmankind'shistorypeoplehavesoughtthe
supportandinteractionof communities. TheFellowshipfor IntentionalCommunitydescribesthe
commonthreadofintentionalcommunities as "idealism- each one wasfoundedon a vision oflivingina
betterway,usually inresponsetosomethingperceived aslackingormissing inthebroaderculture.
Mostcommunities aspiretoprovide a supportive environmentforthedevelopmentof
members'
awareness,abilities,and spiritual growth. Mostseektocreate alifethatwillsatisfythebasic human
cravings:security,family,relationship,fellowship,mutualcooperation,creativityandself-expression,a
sense ofplace,andultimatelya sense of
belonging."34
Historicallythesecommunitieshavegravitatedtowardscertain sizes anddesigns. Anexampleisthe
Yonomamopeoples ofBrazil. The Yonomamo live inalargecircular compoundthatisopeninthe
center wheretheyperformtheirdaily livingandrituals. Whenthetribegrowsovera certainsize,
usuallyaround200adults, thereisanincreasein disagreementsand socialtension thateventuallyresults
inthetribesplitting intotwogroups. This splitting intotwosmaller groups resolvestheconflictsthat
were causedbythegroupbeinglargerthantheoptimalsizeforthegroup.
TheShakersarethemost successful andlongstandinggroup intheU.S. Theywerethemostthoroughly
organized andhaveexistedformorethan225years. Arrivingin America in 1774,"the Shakersbythe 1830'shadattracted some4,000memberstomorethansixty communityunits called
'families'
in nearly
twentydifferentagricultural settlementsfrom Maineto
Indiana."35
The Shakers hadanagrarianbased
societythatbelievedin grouporientedliving,working,eating,singing,dancing,and spirituality. They
promotedthevirtues offaith, hope,honesty, innocence, humility,pacifism, patience,thankfulness,and
34
TheFellowshipforIntentionalCommunity, Communities Directory: A GuidetoIntentional CommunitiesandCooperative,p. 16.
35
charity. Physical laborwas encouraged as well asindustry,andtheydevelopeda unique style of
architecture,furniture, literature,and philosophy. Onceagain asthesize oftheircommunitiesgrew,
theywould splituptoformmoreintimateandfunctionalgroups. Thesegroups averaged250people,
buttheywere subdividedintosmaller groups of50thatworkedtogether, comingtogetherforspecial
events and self-governance. Other intentionalcommunities and societiesin America havealsofound
this sizetobeoptimal,astheOneidaNew YorkPerfectionistswith238peopleintheir community, the
AmanaSocietyinIowawith seven villages with about207peopleineach,andtheBethelCommunityin
Missouriwhichtotaled200members.38
Amodernexample ofthisoptimal size of asociety isthegrowth of abusiness. Businessmodels of
communicationhavenotedthatas abusinessgrows over a certain sizethereisabreakdown inthe
transmissionof oral communicationbetweenalltheindividualsinthegroup. Afterthissizepoint,once
again around200members, thereareindividualswho areaccidentallynotincluded inthe
communicationchain,andtheybegintofellisolated, ignored,and uninvolvedwiththegroup. To
compensate,anewmulti-tieredinformation system mustbe implemented inordertoretainthe
functioningand connectedness ofthebusiness.
Thisprovenhistoricsense ofcommunityappliesequallytourbanand suburban areas. Urbancities are
divided intosmaller neighborhoods orintodwellingconfigurationslikeapartmentbuildingswhere
people caninteract. Lithesehigherdensitybuildings,theinhabitants haveregular and repeated contact
with one another at several oftheshared common spaces. Theseincludethefrontstoop, thelobby,the
mailroom, the elevator, andthehallways. Ineachofthesespacestheneighborshave frequent
interactionssuchthattheirneighborsbecome familiarandlosetheoppressivequalitiesinherentin
strangers.Theseprovidethestructureforthe 'tribe' thatencourages and allowspeopletolive happier
and more effectivelives. As de Toquevilleobserved, "democracydependsuponthefreeassociation of
strangerstogetanythingdone." Urbanareas arefarmore conducivetointeractionofthisnature,as
contrastedto thelackofdailycontact whichoccursinthesuburbs. Coming andgoingat30milesper
hour(48.3kph) theinhabitants onlysee theirso-calledcommunity formacar window. Theseare
36
GeraldandPatriciaGutek,VisitingUtopian Communities: A GuidetotheShakers, Moravians,and
Others,p.31-81.
37
CharlesNordhoff, AmericanUtopias,pp. 179-214.
38
automobilecommunities,oftentimesdevoidofsidewalksor pedestrian areas, thusleadingtolittleor no
senseofcommunityor connection with one's neighbors. Theonlyview oftheneighborhoodthat the
occupantsofthevehicle ever seeisablur, where abrieffleetinginstantof eye contact and a casual nod
are supposedtoreplace an actual conversation or connection.
Basedonthesehistoricalprecedents,I havecomeupwith adesignthatIbelievecouldfunction inour
urbancenters,providingcontemporaryconveniences whileprovidingthemembers withidentityand
belongingwhichIclaimisvitaltoour collectivehappiness. Iwould structure acommunityinour cities
withfourautonomous groups of200composed of around50familiesthatwouldliveincloseproximity
toeachother. Each groupwouldlive inabuildingthathousedall200or perhapsfourcontiguous
buildingsthatwouldhave 50ineach. The first fewfloors wouldbe dedicatedtosocial activities,such
asmeetingareas,lounges,atheatre,cafe, grocerystore,daycare,and a school. The fourgroups would
interactwith each otherthroughsportsevents, plays,dances,meetings,etc. Thisstructure would give
each ofthe50 families ineachgroupseverallayersofbelongingand recognition of others. Atthe
center wouldbethedirectfamilyunitthateach personbelonged too,thenbeingonefamilyof50 inthe
buildingorlivingunitwithall ofthemreadilyfamiliar,andfinally beingonegroupoffour,and
interactingwiththem through school, activities, etc,butneverseeingthemenough sothatall areknown.
Therewould alwaysbemembers onehadnot meetyet,andthusthecommunitywouldseemdynamic
andeffervescent,nevergettingold orboring. Thistypeofcommunitycould provideforthehealthofits
members as well asthehealthof ourcities,repopulatingthemwithconcerned, active,andhappy
citizens.
Urban infillisa crucial aspect ofunderminingthesuburbancancer.OrionKriegman,founderof an
urban ecovillageinBoston,describesthis as"Badlydesigned,impoverishedcitiesholdthepotentialto
betransformedinto forestedgardens ofvibrant multi-cultural neighborhoods . . . withhigh-density,
comfortablelivingin large buildingsconcentrated within severalblocks,lacedwithbikepaths,roof
gardens,terraced cafes,with asphalt andparking lotstornuptoplantorchards,createparks,and surface
long-buriedstreams. Suchdensitywould create enormous efficienciesinthedeliveryof services and
an
use ofenergy,as well asfree uppotentialland currentlypavedoverby
sprawl."
JacobStevens
39
OrionKriegman,"Urban Ecovillages:MakingourCities Greenand
Thriving."
CommunitiesJournalof
Cordivae,cofounder of an ecovillageinDenver, statesthat"Re-use,retrofitting,andrehabilitating
existing buildingsandusingsalvaged andfoundmaterials,islikelytobemoreimportantthannatural
buildingmethods,dueto theresources availableincities andtheirmore conservativezoning regulations."40
Insummary, throughout timecultureshavesoughttofostera sense ofcommunityintheplacesthey
lived. Onlyinrecenttimesas suburbiahasexpanded,hasourlivingenvironment neglectedtoinclude
thisimportantelementindesigningour neighborhoods.
"Thearrangement of spaceisa principledeterminantofthekinds of potential
relationshipsthatcan exist withinthatspace. Thecheapest short-termsolution,like developmentoftheleastexpensive real-estate onthe periphery,may bethemost
expensive optionforour children andtheirchildren. Jfwedecrytheisolation ofthe individual inourworld,ifwe wonder whathappenedtocommunities ofplace,andifwe
are aghast atthesingle-minded pursuit of self-interestthatis so often ahallmarkof our times,wedonot needtolook fordeep-seatedcommon angst. Allwe needtodo isto examinethewaywehavearranged our spacesinour neighborhoods and around our places ofbusiness. As ifbyintentwehavemade relationshipsbetweenpeople
difficult."41
B.F. Skinnerstatesthat thechoiceisclear: "eitherwedo nothingandallow a miserable andprobably
catastrophicfuturetoovertakeus,or we use ourknowledgeabouthuman behaviortocreate a social
environmentinwhich we shallliveproductive andcreativelives anddosowithoutjeopardizingthe
chancesthat thosewhofollowuswillbeabletodothe
same."42
40
Cordivae,Jacob Stevens. "WhyUrban Ecovillagesare
Crucial."
Communities JournalofCooperative
Living,Issue 1 17(Spring2003),p.38. 41
Archibald, p.5. 42
IV. INFLUENCES
Propaganda andthe Anti-Suburbanists
Theuse of photographs aspropaganda or as a method ofintentionallyexertinginfluenceisextensive.
FromtheverybeginningwiththePortraitoftheArtistasaDrownedManbyHippolyteBayard,
producedin 1840one year after photography's unveilingto the public,photographyhas beenusedto
intentionallyattempttochangetheviewer'sbeliefsand opinions(Figure6).
Jacob Riis'swas oneoftheearliest advocates of social changethroughphotographythroughhis
documentationoftheabysmallivingconditions ofimmigrantsthatwere reproducedinnewspapers in
1888andeventuallyinabook HowtheOtherHalfLives(Figures7and8). Andy Grundbergdescribes
hiscrusadeas"Usingafrantichyperbolenowadays reservedfortabloid newpapers,Riis soughtto
mobilize sentimentagainst slumlife in New YorkCity,wherein 1877a population of one million was
housedinsome37,000
tenements."43
Hisgoal,Riisstated, wastomake acollectionof viewsfor lantern
slidestoshow"asno meredescriptioncould, themiseryand vicethathehadnoticedin histenyears of
experience. . . and suggestthedirectioninwhich goodmightbe
done."44
Anothersocial advocate
utilizing photographywasLewis Hinewithhis Child Labor imagesthatshowedyoung Americans hurt
anddisabledfromindustry'sexacting labor (Figures 9and 10). Hine's imagesanddescriptions,as well
ashistirelesslecturing,were criticaltotheimplementationof childlabor lawsintheearlypartofthe
century. GrundbergdescribesHine'sworkas"hispicturesof childlabor, ofwhichtherearehundreds,
are wellknownas exemplars ofthepower ofphotography-becauseof
them,wearetold, Congress
passedlegislation outlawingchild
labor."45
TheUnitedStatesgovernment wasawareofthesesuccesses
andinthe 1930's believedthat thestrategycould workagaintoconvincethepopulacetosupportthe
agenda of social reforms.
Documentaryphotographywasfoundtobeapowerfulandvaluableforce forthegovernment
administrationthatsupportedit,as well asfortheindividualswho createdit. Thegovernmentsupported
theuse ofdocumentaryphotographyduringthe 1930'stogain supportfornewDealprograms and other
relief measuresfor needygroups ofpeople wherephotographywas usedtoillustratethereliefproposals
43
Grundberg,p.54. 44
JacobRiis,HowtheOtherHalfLives,p.23. 45,'
Figure 6.
Hippolyte Bayard. Self-Portraitas aDrownedMan, 1840. Direct Paper Positive. NaomiRosenblum,p.
Figure7.
[image:29.545.96.453.49.512.2]Figure8.
[image:30.545.66.425.51.359.2]Figure9,
[image:31.545.61.489.51.373.2]HUMAN JUNK
OOOD MATERIAL
AT FIRST
No future and^low wages
"Junk1
SHALL INDUSTRY BE ALLOWED TO PUT
THIS COST ON SOCIETY?
Figure10.
[image:32.545.97.456.48.614.2]becauseofitspowerful verisimilitude(Figures 11,12, 13,and 14). Inone oftheirfirstuses of
documentaryphotography,accompanyingthememorandumto thedirectorofthedivisionofRural
RehabilitationintheEmergencyReliefAdministrationofCalifornia inApril 1935 regardingthe
"MigrationofDraughtRefugeestoCalifornia,"PaulTaylordescribestheuse ofphotographyinthat
"theparties [are]photographed asaccuratelyasfieldinvestigationmethods permit. Novariationshave
beenmadebeyondthosenecessarytoprovideintelligiblecontext or condensedpresentation. The
photographicdocumentationofthisreportis
authentic."46
Thekeywordhereisauthentic.Photography
criticAbigailSolomon-Godeaufurtherrelatesthat"theprevalentbeliefthatphotographic
documentationconstituted an unassailable and objectivetruthwaslargelyunchallengedthroughout the
century."47
Becauseofthecontinuingmisconceptionthatphotographs could notlietheycontinuedtobe
usedextensivelybytheResettlement AdministrationandlaterbytheFarmSecurityAdministrationto
furthertheirown political ends.
The FSAphotographers were"vitallyconcerned withthefateofthemigrantfarm familiesand
sharecropperstheyphotographed and wereseekingtobringabout action ontheirbehalf. Theywere
well aware ofthepolitical potential oftheircraftinhelpingtodothis."48
Solomon-Godeaudescribes
howtheywere also aware ofthepotentialtomanipulatethesubjectmatter,"whensubjects smiledinto
thecamera,theywere stage-managedintomore somberposes;sharecroppers who woretheirbest
clothestobephotographedweretoldtochangeintotheirraggedeverydaywear,persuadednottowash
begrimed handsandfaces forthecamera."49
DortheaLange latersaidthat"everythingispropaganda
forwhat youbelievein,actually,isn'tit?"50
Inthe 1970'sphotographersbegan totraintheirlensesonourlivingconditionsandtheydocumentedthe
rapidly proliferatingsuburbs. Theseartistsincluded RobertAdams,JoeDeal,BillOwens,andlater
RichardMisrach. Jonathan Green,critic,professor, andauthorofAmerican Photography:A Critical
Historyillustratesthisnewapproachas:
46
HowardLevin, DortheaLange,FarmSecurityAdministration Photographs:1935-1939,p.77.
47
AbigailSolomon-Godeau, PhotographyattheDock: EssaysonPhotographicHistory, Institutions,and
Practices,p.157.
48
Levin,p.31.
49
Solomon-Godeau,p.179.
50
Figure 11.
Walker Evans. Mississippi, 1936. Gelatin Silver Print. Aperature,Walker Evans. New York:Aperature,
Figure 12.
Figure13.
MarionPost Wolcott. TakingaDrinkandRestingFromHoeingCotton,AllenPlantation, Natchitoches,
[image:36.545.68.426.46.430.2]Figure14.
Marion Post Wolcott. BackStaircase, Belzoni,Mississippi, 1939. GelatinSilver Print. F. Jack
[image:37.545.62.489.46.389.2]'The earlyphotographers ofthelandstood withthecivilizedworldbehindthemand
lookedouttowardthewilderness. Inthelaterhalfoftheseventiesthenewbreedof
photographers reversedthisorientation. Theystoodintheopenlandand pointedtheir
camerasbacktowards theapproachingcivilization. Ratherthanexplorerspushing into
the unknown, thesephotographers were observersdocumentingtheconflicttakingplace
between manand nature onthenewAmerican frontier. Theyphotographedthatpointin
thelandscapewheretheOld Westwasunceasinglyandirreversiblydissolvinginto
contemporary,homogenizedAmerica."51
Theworkbythesephotographers wasinresponseto the 19thcenturyphotographers,whosephotographs
"weretacitprotests againstthecontemporaryproduction ofimagesthatdepictedatraditionallysublime
landscape;such photographs were consideredanachronistic, naive,andindefensible."52 Green describes
thewhole ofthework as"thedominantthemeofthisnewAmerican Frontierwasthephenomenonof
changethatoccurs withthe transformationofthewilderness,ruralterritory, and openland intourban
environment. Thedominantpresenceinthis photography,however,was notthepresentbutthepast. . .
Fromthisperspectiveit describesthelandasit has been tamed,conquered,broken,anddevelopedby
theadvancing lineof settlements. Thefrontierthatisphotographedistheintersectionofreality, myth,
technologyandwilderness,rural independenceandindustrialdependence."53
"Inthework ofLewis BaltzandRobertAdams,art,nature,andindustrial form becomeinextricably
tangled. Bothphotographthemeetingpointoflandand settlementinsuch awaythat thelandscapeand
thebuildingsassume qualitiestraditionallyassociated withtheother. Inreality,boththelandandthe
architecture areusuallybanal,sterile,bleak,andscruffy. . . Thelandscapetakesonattributes of
industrialregularity,urbanbrutality,and
artificiality."54
"Thoughthesephotographers presentedtheirworkasformalstatement
and carefuldocumentationandthoughtheyweredeeplyaware ofthe difference betweenundefiledterrainanddevelopedland,theirhallmark
was notirony. Neitheraretheirphotographsemotionallyneutral:these
arephotographs abouttaking, exploiting,andrapingtheland. Atthesame
timetheyare alsoaboutthevisual potentialsof adamaged landscape.
Uncomfortable beforethetraditionallymagnificentviews, these
photographers self-consciouslyavoidedtheoverlydramatic; theywere
unwillingandunabletomakethegrand gesturesofMuybridge, Weston,
51
JonathanGreen,American Photography: A CriticalHistory1945tothePresent,p. 164. 52
Green,p. 166. 53
Green,p. 164. 54
andAnselAdams. Equallyuncomfortablebeforethespiritualennui ofthe
contemporarylandscape,theysought outthesublimeaspect ofthe
ordinary. Photographyprovided a meansfor creatingvisual
beautyout of
thematerialthatin realityofferedlittle hope forspiritual redemption.
Insteadofpresentingthedistressingsuburban worldthatPeter Blake
recordedin 1973 in God's OwnJunkyard,thesephotographerstooka
view closerto thatadvancedbyRobert Venturi in 1972 inLearningfrom
LasVegas. Theyrecognizedthebeautifulinthedisdainedand endowed
thevulgar andtheordinary with a new pastoralism. Inthe end,then,the
landscapeand suburb arebothglorified anddisparagedintheirwork. The
photography istorn betweenbeingtrue to theirworld
-whichisthebasis fordocumentation
-andbeingtrue to themedium-whichis
thebasisof
art. Theessential hallmarkofthephotographyofthenewAmerican
landscapeisambivalence."55
Adamsisperhapsthemost recognized of theTopographiesgroup,ashe isa skilled writer as well as
photographer. HephotographedinDenver,Coloradoduringthe1970's,capturingtheincrediblegrowth
that thecityunderwentduringthattimeperiod. Heshowstheadvancingsuburbanlandscapeandits
detritus,form litteron adoomedgrassyplaneto thedoomed livesoftheinhabitants inthisempty
landscape(Figure 15). Adamsreferstodestructionwith, "ThesuburbanWestis,froma moral
perspective,depressingevidencethatwehavemisused ourfreedom."56 Heshowsthepopulation
isolated,alone,and miserable. Imagesoflone dinersamidcountlessemptychairshighlightthesolitude
thatismoderndayDenverandtheNew West (Figure 16).
InAdams'sbook What WeBought,he lamentsthedestructionoftheWest in hiseloquentimagesand
words. Inthe preface,he describestheencroachment ofthe city "asthemetropolitanarea'spopulation
increased,largetractsofhastilyconceived commercial and residentialbuildingswereadded,weakening
thesocialfabric. Whowere one's
neighbors?"57
He documentsthesesprawlingtractsofhousesand
theirinevitablepurposelessness, furiousover ourneglectandlackofcontrol. Hespeaksa sorrowful
testamentof our shortsightednesswith,"In afewyearsthearea'sruin wouldbetestament toabargain
wehadtriedtostrike. Thepicturesrecord what wepurchased,whatwepaid,andwhat wecould not
55
Green,p. 167. 56
Green,p. 168. 57
Figure 15.
B^H'^^^H
m*
-'.!
t
*
X '
'>
3
IT? ri
0"
,
*
y
'
m/t
Tt"^
c^i-
t\
Figure16.
[image:41.545.79.438.46.418.2]buy. Theydocumenta separationfromourselves,andinturnfromthenatural worldthatwe professed
to
love."58
In BillOwens'bookSuburbia,hisportraits of atown's inhabitantswere collectedtogethertocreate a
derogatoryrepresentationofsuburbia. Heplaceshisown views ontohis subjectsthrough theselective
useof quotesfromthe subjects,usingshort,fragmentaryphrases and sentencestoadvancehisown
agenda,asthecompletedialoguethatwas recorded would notportraythesubjectsinsuch a poorlight
(Figure 17). Contrarytowhathesaysintheintroduction,Owensisnotattemptingtoexpressthelives
andrealityofthe people,butinstead hisownrealityandhow hebelievesthatsuburbiahasaffectedit.
Theintroductoryimagesshowthedestructivenessofthesuburban growth processthatfewofthe
interviewed individualsseemtoacknowledge(Figure 18). Anotherthemepresentedinthebook isthe
generallackof satisfaction withtheirlivesandlifestyles,andthewaysthey trytofillthevoid(Figure
19). Oneofthemoreinterestingaspectsisthatbecausetheyare sodeeplyhabituatedwiththeideasof
suburbanliving,theynever realizethatit isthecauseoftheirmisery. Oneman,latemiddle-aged and
balding,reflects onhis lifeas"my hobbyisdrinking."59 Heispicturedsittingat aminiaturebar in his
housewith a multitude of assortedliquor bottles surrounding him (Figure 20). Rampantmaterialismis
another manifestation oftheunattainable salvethatOwensrepresents. Owensalso wantstoexpressthe
isolationandlonelinessthata suburbanlifestyleenforces. Theseparation of everyoneinthecommunity
bywalls andfences,andeachfamily'sretreatintothehidden backyard,maintainsafragmentedand
unhappysociety.Oneoftheimageswithouttextsimplyshows anemptylivingroom withtwochairs
facingatelevision(Figure 21). The image iscoldandbarrenandillustratesthelackof connection
exceptthroughT.V. Inanotherimage,onecoupleinsistedthatitwasasource of
"freedom"
that"no
oneknowswhat youreallydo,"but actuallythisfeelingofcompleteanonymity isattheroot oftheir
problems.60
Joe Dealphotographs"theoutskirtsofAlbuquerque,Dealrecordstheintersectionofthesocial andthe
naturalworld. The land hasnot yetsolidifiedintourban center or suburb. Itlies uneasily betweenpast
andpresent,stillharboringcontrastingruralandurban values. It simultaneouslyembodiestheAmerican
dreamofcountrylivingandthenightmareofdeveloperexploitation. . . Streetsandutilitypoles
58
Adams,Preface.
59
Figure17.
Bill Owens. We'rereallyhappy. Our kidsarehealthy,we eat goodfood,and wehaveareallynicehome,
[image:43.545.59.491.48.401.2]Figure 18.
Bill Owens. I boughtthelawn insix-foot rolls. It's easytohandle. Ipreparetheground andmywifeand
Figure 19.
Bill Owens. Our house is builtwiththelivingroomintheback,sointheevenings we sit outfront ofthe
Figure20.
BillOwens. My hobbyisdrinking. OntheweekendsI enjoy gettingtogetherwithmy friendsandboozing,
[image:46.545.65.425.49.514.2]Figure21.
[image:47.545.61.487.51.353.2]suddenly appear,incongruously,onempty land. Ineach single photographthefulltransitionfromopen
land tosuburbhappensrightbeforeour eyes.
"61
RichardMisrach,while not part oftheNewTopographiesgroup,is acontemporaryphotographer who
portraystheWest,thelandscape,andits inhabitantsandthedestructionthataccompaniestheirpresence.
Hisphotographsshow complexissuesofhistorical,political, social,and aesthetic concerns. Muchof
hisworkdealswithissuesofbeautyandaesthetics,inthat theimagesof ravagedlandsaredifficultto
reconcilewiththeconcept ofbeauty(Figure 22). Misrachdescribesitas"aestheticizinghorror",
influencedbyWalter BenjaminandSusanSontag,making itnotonlymorepalatable,butattractive.62
Sincethe80'she hasphotographedtheAmerican desertsand man'sinfluenceonthem(Figure 23). He
showsa worldthatisnot awilderness,untouchedbymankind,butrather alandthathas been "converted
foreconomic gain andintheprocess stained andtrampled, franchisedandfenced, burned, flooded,
grazed, mined, exploited,andlaid
waste."63
(Figure24)
Thesetopographicartists each examinetheAmericanlandscapeanditsinhabitants,but in different
manners. Adams focusesonthesuburbanbuildingsandtheirfailures. Owensphotographsthepeople
wholiveinoneCaliforniansuburb,usingtheirown words astestimonyoftheirunhappiness.Deal's
imagesare aloof anddistantwiththeseemingly desertedneighborhoodsechoingtheirlackoflifeand
vitality. Misrach seesthebeautyinthedesertandthewastethatmankind createswiththoughtless
disregard. These fourartists areexamplesof theAnti-Suburbiaworkthathas influenced my
philosophies andphotography in my desiretotryandsubvertthesuburbsandeventually playa rolein
theirdestruction.
TheHarrisons
The 60'swere atimewhenmanyartists werechangingtheirapproachtoart. Itwasatimewhenthere
was a growth of a"countercultureloathingofcommercialismandareluctancetocreate salable
art-as-objecttobeshowcasedinthegallery-collector'shome-museum
context."64 Asaresult,therewas an
60
Owens,p.42. 61
Green,p.173.
62
RichardMisrach,CrimesandSplendors:theDesertCantos,p.15. 63
Misrach,p.22. 64
Figure 22.
Figure 23.
Figure 24.
increaseintheuseof earthart,installationart,performanceart,andbodyart. "Thiswas a period when
artisticopinionabouttheenvironment wasdominatedby artists such asMichaelHeizer,whoseDouble
Negative(1969)involvedthedisplacementof240,000tonsof earthintheNevadadesert;Walter De
Maria,who set400steel poles instraightlines over a square mile oftheNew Mexico deserttodraw
lightningtohisLightningField(1977);andRobertSmithson,whoseSpiralJetty (1970)was a giant coil
of rockstretchingfromtheshoreinto Utah'sGreatSaltLake. Createdtomove art out ofthegallery into
thereal worldandtodefytheturningof artintoacommodity,projectslikethese alsohadaless savory
sideintheirtendencytousurptheearth asjustanotherkindof raw material availableforartistic
transformationand
exploitation."65
The60'
s were also atimeof counterculture revolution andtheriseofidealsof environmentalism and
ecologicalrespect,and while some oftheseartists were concerned withtheenvironment andtheimpact
oftheir work,themajorityof
artists'
pieces weredestructiveand unconcernedwiththeecosystemsthey
weresituatedin. The doublenegativeessentially dumped 240,000tonsof earthontotheplantsand
animals ofthesurroundingterrain,aswellascreatinga'tailingspile'
equivalentto thosecreatedbythe
miningcompanieswhicharethesource of pollutantsforcenturiestocome. Someoftheartists realized
thenegative aspects oftheirwork,butfor many itwaslate intheircareers.
"Towardstheend ofSmithson'slife,histhinkingbecamemore positive. Hebeganto
thinkofecologyandthesocialrolethatearthworksmightplay intherehabilitationofthe
environment. Ashewrote: 'Acrossthecountrytherearemany miningareas,disused
quarries,and pollutedlakesandrivers. Onepracticalsolutionfortheutilizationofsuch
devastatedplaceswouldbe landand waterre-cycling intermsof"Earth
Art.'"
Theartist
would mediatebetweenecologists andindustrialists. Smithsonproposedbothtoprettify
stripmines,sludgeheaps,and otherdevastatedsitesandtorevealtheravagesof
humankind'spollution. Heexecuted onelandreclamationproject,Broken Circle/Spiral
Hill(1971),inanabandonedquarry intheNetherlands. Ayearlater hewastragically
killed beforehecouldfurtherrealizehis landreclamation
art."66
HelenandNewton Harrisonare aCaliforniacouple whohave been involved in creatingenvironmental
artthatcooperates withthe environment,andlooktonature withtheintentionofpreservation. They
sharedateachingposition at theUniversityofCaliforniain San Diego from 1969to1993,anditwasin
65
Eleanor Heartney. "Ecopolitics/Ecopoetry:HelenandNewton Harrison's EnvironmentalTalking
Cure.'
Butis itArt?The Spirit ofArtasActivism,p.141.
66
theearly 70'sthattheybegan toformtheirunique approachtoenvironmentalissuersand concerns.
Theirworkhadalarge influenceonthestructure ofthis thesisas well asit'spresentationinthe thesis
exhibition.
Theirapproachstemsfromtakingan"issuewithconventionalthinkingthat theexpansion of urban
boundariesultimatelybreed disaster for boththelandandits humaninhabitants. Insteadtheyadvocate
variousformsof restoration and reclamationtobringhumanneedsback intosynchronism with natural
fa
processes."
Thepresentation oftheirwork was quite uniquefortheir timeas "Overtheyearsthe
Harrisonshave developeda uniqueecopolitics,couchedintheformof an ecopoetry. Combiningtext
withphotographs,drawings,andmaps, theHarrisonsemploythelanguageofstorytellingtopresentthe
resultsof theirinvestigations intoa particular problem or a specific ecosystem. Eachworkispresented
as apoeticdialoguewoventogetherfromdiversevoices,includingthoseofplanners, ecologists,
botanists,foresters,theartiststhemselves,and eventherivers and waterways whosehistoriesand
futuresareunderconsideration. Borrowingpromiscuously fromotherdisciplines,thevoices use
metaphor,irony,andanalogytosuggest new ecological strategiesand
approaches."68
(Figures25and
26)
The Harrisonswereworkingon a project withtheSava river inYugoslavia,whichhad been damagedby
industrialfarmingpracticesthatleechedtoxicfertilizers intothesoil andwater,andtheenvironmental
burdensoftherecentlyarrivedindustryalongtheriver, consistingof a papermill,acoalmine,an
atomicenergyplant,and afertilizerfactory(Figure 27).
"Aswith alltheHarrisons'projects, theirworkontheSavacomprisedtwoparts. The
first involvedthe actualconversations withthe planners, scientists,andordinarypeople
theyencounteredintheirinvestigationsandthereverberationstheseconversations setin
motion. Thesecond part oftheproject consisted ofthevisualrecordthat theHarrisons
producedintheformof aninstallationofmaps,texts,and photographs. ...thework
wraps aroundthegallerywalls. Viewers followthecourse of theriver visuallyasthey
readthe textsinwhichtheHarrisonsmeditate uponthespecific problems and solutions at
variousjunctures. Perhapsmorethananyother narrativebytheHarrisons,thisproject
capturestheconversational natureoftheirwork. Sectionsofthetextare writtenas dialoguesbetweentheartistsandvariousindividualswhomtheyencounteredintheir
investigations. We hear fromaBotanistaboutthedangerouseffectsthatmodern
flood-67
Heartney,p.145.
68
Anaerialview of
Pasadena's Devil's Gate
Damcirca1986reveals
thedrained debris basin
and rubblepilethe
Harrisonsencountered
wheninvitedtodevelopa watershedrestoration planforthearea.
[image:54.545.83.417.69.401.2].
...Figure 25.
HelenandNewton Harrison. Devel's Gate: A Refuge forPasadena, 1986. Mixed Media. NinaFelshin,p.
The architectural model
for the Harrisons'
Devil's
Gate project was an
importantelementinthe
presentationoftheir ideas to localgovernment
[image:55.545.215.474.74.334.2]and ecologicalgroups.
Figure 26.
HelenandNewton Harrison. Devel's Gate: A Refuge forPasadena,1986. Installation View. Nina
HelenandNewton
Harrison,Atempausefur den Save Fluss(Breathing Spacefor the SavaRiver),
1989.TheHarrisons'
planfor theSava River includeda proposalto
createanature preserve
for migratingwaterfowl
inanareacurrently
containing large fish
ponds.
Notingthatrunofffrom thechemicalfertilizers
employedin thefarms thatline the Sava River jeopardizes thewater
shed, theHarrisons
proposedthereplace mentof current practices
byorganicfarming.
HdeTand Newton Harrison. BreathingSpace fortheSuvaRiver, 1989. MixedMedia. NinaFelshin,p.