• No results found

Epstein-Barr virus EBNA3A and EBNA3C proteins both repress RBP-J kappa-EBNA2-activated transcription by inhibiting the binding of RBP-J kappa to DNA.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Epstein-Barr virus EBNA3A and EBNA3C proteins both repress RBP-J kappa-EBNA2-activated transcription by inhibiting the binding of RBP-J kappa to DNA."

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

FIG. 1. EBNA3A and EBNA3C inhibit EBNA2-mediated activation. (A)Schematic representation of the reporter plasmid pTK-CAT-Cp4x
FIG. 3. Both EBNA3A and EBNA3C are recruited by Gal4-RBP3 to apromoter carrying Gal4 binding sites
FIG. 4. Endogenous RBP-J�E) is recruited by Gal4-EBNA3A or Gal4-EBNA3C to a promoter carrying Gal4binding sites
FIG. 6. EBNA3A and EBNA3C inhibit RBP-J�EMSA was performed with in vitro-translated proteins

References

Related documents

Compared with the nonprogressor macaques, the two progressor macaques exhibited higher persistent plasma viremia, higher homologous neutralizing antibody titers, and more

This paper discusses the deployment of three different but complementary approaches—dialogism, co-operative community and performance space—to integrating theory, method and

(B) Amber/W editing in nonreplicating HDV RNAs isolated from Huh-7 cells 3 days after transfection with the nonreplicating RNA expression construct pHDV ● III-NR containing

randomized controlled trial on 200 patients by Shravage et al the mean duration of the III stage. was 5.02 minutes in the study group and 7.42 minutes in the

A model reconciling these conflicting data was recently provided in the HBV system by complementary studies from three groups in- vestigating L-protein synthesis and topology using

In assay 1, unmyristylated Gag amber mutants analyzed by SDS- PAGE were immobilized on a membrane and soluble unmyri- stylated full-length Gag precursor expressed by mutant

Several attempts to correlate the specific patterns of V3 sequence variability with the biological properties of the patients’ isolates have been made (7, 18, 30, 38), but most of

COMPARISON OF RECENT PISA MODEL WITH REVISED GENEVA SCORE AND WELL’S SCORE IN PREDICTING THE PROBABILITY OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN INDIAN CONTEXT is a bonafide work done by me at