JOURNALOFVIROLOGY, June 1971,p. 753-758 Vol.7,No. 6 Copyright ( 1971 American Society for Microbiology PrintedinU.S.A.
Analysis of the
Fusion
of
XC
Cells Induced by
Homogenates of Murine
Leukemia
Virus-Infected Cells and
by
Pur-ified
Murine Leukemia Virus
GEORGE S. JOHNSON,1 ROBERT M. FRIEDMAN, AND IRA PASTAN
Laboratories of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Cancer Institute,Bethesda, Maryland20014
Received for publication 22 February 1971
The fusion of XC cells inducedby murine leukemia virus (MuLV)-infected cells is also induced by homogenates prepared from the infected cells and by purified MuLV. The fusion-inducing factor appears to contain a heat-labile
lipoprotein.
No synthesis of specific macromolecules by the XC cells is necessary to obtain fusion. The results suggest that specific components of the viral particle are the
activatorsfor the fusion process andtheymay also be present in the membranes of
infected cells.
Tissueculture cells of the XC cellline, aRous sarcoma virus-induced rat tumor (14), undergo
syncytium formationwhenplacedin contactwith
mouse embryo cell cultures infected with murine
leukemia virus (MuLV;reference 7). This mixed
culture cytopathic effect has been utilized as an
indicatorsystemfordetectingMuLV-infected cell
lines (7) and as arapidmeans oftitratingthese
viruses intissue culture
(13).
Thesyncytium
for-mation is thought to be due to cellular fusion
rather than to endomitosis (7), but the
mecha-nism of thefusion and the biochemical stimulus
for syncytium induction are unknown.
MuLV is released from the infected cellsby a
process of
budding
fromtheplasma
membrane.It isthuspossiblethat the activators for the fusion
areeithervirus-specific components of the
cellu-lar membraneorthevirusitselfintheprocess of
budding or adhering to the cellular membrane.
In this study, we report that intact, infected
cells are not required but that cellular
homoge-nates also inducethe fusion. Furthermore, high
concentrations of
purified
MuLVparticles
inducethe fusion. The results suggest that components
of theviralparticlewhich mayalsobepresent in
the membranes of theinfected cells are the
acti-vators for the fusion process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tissueculture.The XCcell line (7, 14) andMuLV
(Moloneystrain) (11) wereobtained from J.Hartley
IRecipient of Public Health Service postdoctoralfellowship
no. l-F02-GA35507-01.
and W. Roweof the NationalInstitute ofAllergy and
Infectious Diseases.
Cultures of 15-to17-day-oldNationalInstitutesof
Health (NIH) Swiss mouse embryos were obtained
from Microbiological Associates, Inc. (Bethesda,
Md.). Secondarycultureswereplantedandinoculated
aspreviously described (5, 6). The mouse embryo cells
and the XCcells were grown inEagle's minimal
es-sential medium with 10%fetal bovineserum(Grand
IslandBiologicalCo.,GrandIsland,N.Y.),glutamine
(2mM),penicillin (50,g/ml),streptomycin(50 units/
ml),polymyxin sulfate (100units/ml),and mycostatin
(50 units/ml). Both cell types were grown in 32-oz (0.946 liter) tightly stoppered, glass culture bottles
andincubatedat37 C.
Preparation of fusion factor from infected mouse
embryocells.Cellculturesofmouseembryocellswere
incubated 1 to 2 weeks after inoculation. The cells
were removed from the monolayer by scraping and
were suspended in hypotonic buffer (RSB), [0.01 M
tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane(pH 7.4), 0.0015
MMgCl2,0.01MNaCl].Thecellswerepelletedat700
X g, resuspended inRSB, and homogenizedwith 20
strokes of a tight fitting Dounce homogenizer. The
homogenate wascentrifuged for 10 minat 700 X g.
Theresulting700 X g supernatantwascentrifugedat
35,000 X g for15minandthepelletwassuspendedin
RSB.Samples were treatedasdescribed. The resultant
suspensions were recentrifuged at35,000 X gfor 15
min, and the pellets and supematantswereanalyzed
forfusion-inducingactivity.
Development ofcelularfusion. The XC cellswere
removed from the substratum bytrypsinization and
were plantedat 1.2 X 101to 1.4 X 101 cells per
60-mm plastic, tissue culture dish (FalconPlastic,Div.
753
on November 11, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
JOHNSON, FRIEDMAN, AND PASTAN
ofB-D Laboratories, Los Angeles, Calif.). The cell
layer developedtoaconcentration ofapproximately
2.5 X 106cells by 18to24hrat37Cinahumidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The appropriate
sampleof thefusionfactorwasthenadded, andafter
48 hr the cellswerestainedwithhematoxylin.
Cell andmembranefractionation. Acell homogenate
wascentrifugedfor 10 minat700 X g,and the
result-ing supernatants were centrifuged successively at
11,000 X g for 10 min, 35,000 X gfor 10 min, and
90,000 X g for 1 hr. To fractionate cell membranes,
the 700 X g supernatantwas made30% (by weight)
sucrose in RSBby addition of65% sucrose. A
dis-continuous gradient (3) was formed bylayering su-crose solutions in thefollowing order: 3 ml of65%,
7ml of 45%, 7 ml of 40%, 10 ml offusionfactor
sus-pensionin 30% sucrose, 7 ml of 25%, and 4 ml of RSB ontop, Thegradient wascentrifugedat 86,000
X g for 16 hr inaSpincomodel SW 27rotor. Visible
bandsofmaterial werecollected bymeansofaPasteur
pipette.Thefractions were diluted 5- to10-foldin RSB andpelleted at35,000 X g for1 hr.Thepelletswere
suspended in 1 ml of RSB, anddensities were
deter-minedbyweightratiosrelativetowater.Inall
experi-ments, protein concentrations were determined by
the method described by Lowry et al. (9) by using
bovineserumalbuminasthestandard.
PurificationofMuLV.Purified MuLVwasobtained
from Electro-Nucleonics Laboratories (Bethesda,
Md.). It had beenpurifiedbyuseofoneortwo
iso-pycnic sucrose gradients with zonal
ultracentrifuga-tion (16). In thefirst gradient, viruswascollected at
densities of 1.14to 1.16g/ml,whereas, in the second
gradient, virus was collected at 1.15 to 1.16 g/ml. Viral particles from both collections were
concen-tratedto101l to1012virusparticles/ml.The final
con-centrations weredetermined
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.:i
byelectron microscopy...gr~~~~~~.
.:'*
. 4;*. wj:' *a::^:.... .:Thesecond banding removed some nonviral material.
The concentrated, once-banded virus contained 0.8 to
1.0 mg of protein/ml(i.e.,per 101l to 1012 virus
parti-cles), whereas the concentrated, twice-banded virus contained 0.5 to 0.7 mg of protein/ml.
Electron microscopy. The 700 to 35,000 X g pellets
were fixed in glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide
(4) andembedded by the method described by Luft
(10). Theelectron micrographswere taken by William
Hall of Electro-Nucleonics Laboratories at X 19,000
magnification by using an Hitachi HU-IlE electron
microscope.
RESULTS
Description of fusion process. When XC cells are added to a monolayer ofmouse embryo cells in-fected with MuLV, syncytium formation occurs. Ourpreliminary experiments showed that similar
syncytium formation also occurs when infected
mousecells are added to XC monolayers. Within
afew hoursafter addition of infected mouse
em-bryo cellsortheir homogenates, but not uninfected
cells oruninfected cell homogenates, to a mono-layer of XC cells, cellular fusion is apparent
(Fig. 1). The multinucleated cells become larger
and more numerous withfurther incubation, and
thefusionprocess is completewithin 48 hr. The
resulting cells can be divided into three general
groups:(i) small multinucleatedcells composed of
2to10nuclei; (ii) largercellscomposed ofabout
10to 30 nuclei, often accompanied by vacuoles
and occasionally nuclear fusion; and (iii)
ex-tremely large
cells composedof anindeterminablenumber ofnuclei with nuclear fusion, often
ex-tensive, and marked vacuolization.
..
.-A'4
FIG. 1. XC cellsin the processoffusion. Cells were stained with hematoxylin at 5 hr after addition of the
fusion-inducing factor. An identical sample caused +5 fusion in 48 hr in another culture. X 250.
754 J. VIROL.
on November 11, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:2.493.129.389.433.630.2]MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS
Thesize andnumberofthemultinucleatedcells
is dependent upon the amount of fusion factor added. Hence, afusionindex system based on the number of multinucleated cells and the number of nuclei per cell can beutilizedas a method of
quan-titation. Inthis indexsystem,fusionconsisting of
asmallnumber ofmultinucleated cellsand a few
nuclei percell is given a + 1 rating, whereas
fu-sion involving roughly one-half of the cells is
rated +3. Inthe fusionrated +5, essentially all
theXC cells areinvolved in the fusion, and
nu-merous, extremely large,bizarre cells are appar-ent.
Typical
resultsareshowninFig.2and 3. The presence of excessive nuclear fusionprevents theutilization ofamoreprecise quantitative method
suchasthatbasedontheexactnumberof nuclei
per
cell.
Distribution of thefusionactivity.The
distribu-tion of the fusion-stimulating activity in the
in-fectedcell homogenates is showninTable1. The
activity is detected in all oftheparticulate
frac-tions butnotinthe 90,000 X g supernatant. The
11,000 to35,000Xgfraction ismostactive. This
fractionrepresents at leasta fivefold purification
of the fusion factor overthewhole homogenate.
Various treatments of the homogenate were
utilized in attempts to solubilize the fusion
fac-tors. The treatments used were sonic treatment
for 2min at 0 C
(model
W140D, Sonifier CellDisruptor, 50 w power), rapid freezing and
thawing in RSB or in RSB
plus
1.7 MKCI,
andstorage ofthehomogenate in RSB plus 0.001 M
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid overnight at 4 C.
None of these treatments significantly alters the
distribution, although they decrease the total
amount of fusion caused by a given sample of the homogenate.
Thedensity ofthecytoplasmicmembrane
frac-tionscontaining thefusion-inducing activitywas
determined by discontinuous sucrose gradient
centrifugation (Table 2). In the gradient system
applied, the most active components band at a
density of1.15 g/ccwith an additional band of
activity of 1.18g/cc. Thereare no visible bands
other than those indicated.
Stability studies. The stability of the
fusion-stimulating
factors to treatment by various en-zymes wastested.Samples of the700 X g super-natant or 700 to 35,000 X gfraction (200to 300,ug
ofprotein)
wereincubated for 15to30minat37 C inthepresence ofoneofthefollowing en-zymes: ribonuclease (0.5 ,ug/ml),
deoxyribonu-clease (25
,ug/ml), trypsin (5
to 200,g/ml), orneuraminidase (50
,g/ml).
Thetrypsintreatmentat concentrations as low as 5
,ug/ml completely
destroys the fusion-stimulating activity, whereas
the other enzymes have no effect. Incubation
overnight
at0 Cwith thelipase,steapsin (0.07%;
Nutritional
Biochemicals
Corp.,Cleveland,
Ohio), also destroys the
activity.
Treatment of thehomogenates with ether
fol-lowed byremoval of the ether by
bubbling
withnitrogen
completely
destroys theactivity.*
The activity is stable
during
10 to 15 min ofK
I.*
.1
.S,.
*s :%
....,X+
Y.as...x
i.
*. vs #:
,
.
.,Q¢S i$ s
d
i i.t
,,
".s:
9I ,
..F. .C
FIG. 2. Control XC celi( culture. X 250.
VOL.7,1971
755
..P.
i..A
,.t-k
I .4. `
I.
..,A .M.l
1.-w
.11`8; .k-4
41 .P-..
'A. ...,
1 4
0: :,:. .
on November 11, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
4'Z
A :!:,Pm.,. .,.
.,.e
*e f *.
f r^ 4 ...
.. ::
& *
*:
>
tt
At
W.ti -6 _s8
....e.b .. Xb
_, ,.
4.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~w A ':
I.
Y
.t:..
'a
cB
..
st.::':R::,04'
It
*;
:ea % ...;:..;*-%>s<
*
+
;S
> 9
I
4-~~~~~~~~~~~, ..
FIG. 3. Syncytium induced by homogenates
of MuLV-infected
mouseembryo
cells. Pictures showtypical
examplesofthefusionindexsystem
employed
inthisstudy:
(A) +2 fusion
rating;(B)
+3fusion
rating;(C)
+5fusionrating. X 250.
756
.1.
A.-.1, .1 I
."+U jl....t , -, -,
.'f' ':"'
4%I. li.
.1
on November 11, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:4.493.119.387.38.620.2]MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS
TABLE 1. Distributionz offusion-inducingactivity
in mouseembryo cell homogenates
FractionFraction Amt of
~~tested (ug)
protein FusionindexWhole cell homogenate.. 510 +3
700X g Pellet... 350 +2
700 XgPellet... 1,050 +4
700to11,000 Xg...350 +5
11,000to35,000 X g .... 120 +4
35,000to90,000 X g... 240 +2
90,000 X gSupernatant 500 0
TABLE 2. Densityof cell homogetiatefractions contiainingfusion-inducing activity
Density (g,'cc) Amtofp(otein Fusion index
1.099 97 0
1.100 97 +1
1.146 125 +3
1.181 230 +2
incubation at 37 or 44 C but is completely
in-activated at 50 C. About 50%0 of the activity is
destroyed during6 hrofincubation at37 C.
FusioninducingabilityofpurifiedMuLV. Since
MuLVis released fromthecellby budding from
the cellular membrane. it seems possible that
virusparticlesintheprocessofbuddingorloosely
adheringto thecellmembrane maybepresentin
thecellularhomogenate andthus be the stimulus
forsyncytiuminduction. To check for sucha
pos-sibility we tested purified virusfor
fusion-induc-ing abilityand checked for thepresence of viral
particles in the homogenate. Extensive fusion is
observed with the addition of large amounts
(more than 109 viral particles per dish) ofboth
once-andtwice-banded virus (Table 3);however,
negligible fusionisobserved withsmallersamples
of the virus. The resulting multinucleated cells
developwithin afew hours after addition of the
virus and are identical in appearance to those
shown in Fig. 3. The twice banded virus is
ap-proximately five times more effective per
milli-gramofprotein than themostefficientparticulate
fraction from infected mouse embryo cells
(Table 1);25,ugofvirus protein is required for a
+4 fusion, whereas 120 ,ug of protein from the
particulate fraction is required for similar levels
of fusion. Itappears that thefusion is caused by
thevirus andnotbyacellularcontaminantinthe
virusfraction sinceapproximately equalamounts
offusionare obtainedbyusinganequal number
of particles of once-purified or twice-purified
virus(seeMaterials andMethods). Also,the
pres-enceofacellular contaminant bandingat a
den-sityof1.15 to 1.16g/mlin sufficientamountsto
induce the fusion is unlikely.
Electron microscopywasemployedto estimate the number of viral particles in the cellular
ho-mogenate.Numerous viral particles are found in
the 700 to 35,000 x g fraction of the infected
mouseembryo cellhomogenate. As many as 109
to1010particlesarepresentinsamples whichcause
extensive fusion. Since this is inrange of the
re-sults shown in Table 3 for purified virus, it is in-deedpossible that the fusion caused by the cellu-larhomogenates is due solelytothe viralparticles
and not to specific components in the cellular
membranes, but additional investigations are
necessaryforanunequivocal answer tothis
ques-tion.
Is therearequirement for cellular metabolic
ac-tivityfor fusion? XC cellcultures wereincubated for 6 hr at 37 C with 1010 viral particles (once banded) and one of the following compounds: actinomycin D (0.5 ,g/ml), puromycin (20 ,ug/ ml), cycloheximide (10
Ag/ml),
rifamycin (120 ,ug/ml), or rat serum interferon (60 units in 0.1 ml rat serum). None of the added compounds in-hibited or activated fusion, suggesting that spe-cificsynthesis of macromoleculesorviralparticles by the XC cells is notrequired forsyncytium for-mation.DISCUSSION
XC cells undergo syncytium formation when placed in contactwith cellsinfectedwith MuLV.
The syncytiumformation isthoughttobedueto
fusion rather than byendomitosis (7). The results of this study show that intact, infected cells are not required, but that homogenates of the in-fected cells and also purified viral particles will induce XC cell fusion.
MuLV is released from the cells bya budding
process.Thus, viral specificproductsmay remain as part of the cell membrane andinducethe fu-sion,orviralparticlesin the process ofbuddingor
looselyadheringtothecellsurface afterbudding
may be responsible for the fusion.Virus-specific
antigens are found in infected cell membranes
(12).However, thelargenumberof viralparticles
observed in the infected cellhomogenatessuggest
TABLE 3. Fusiont induced by murine leukemia virus
Fusion index No. of virusparticles
Oncebanded Twicebanded
1 X 109 +1 +2
2 X 109 +2 +3
4 X 109 +4 +4
10 X 109 +5 +5
VOL. 7, 1971 757
on November 11, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:5.493.46.240.93.194.2] [image:5.493.46.237.96.304.2] [image:5.493.252.441.568.652.2]JOHNSON, FRIEDMAN, AND PASTAN
that the viralparticles may be solely responsible
for the fusion. Further investigation of the
ho-mogenates is necessary for an unequivocal
an-swer.
Cellular fusion induced by various strains of
Newcastle disease virus (NDV) is ofone oftwo
types, fusion from withinorfusion fromwithout
(2). SincethefusioninducedbyMuLV
(Moloney
strain)is insensitive toinhibitors of
macromolec-ular synthesis, the process would be considered
fusionfrom without.However, it ispossiblethat the fusion of XC cells induced by cells infected
with other strains of MuLV (7) may be caused bya fusion from within process.
The factors responsible for the syncytium
for-mationareheat
labile,
sensitivetotrypsin, lipase,
andether but insensitive to
ribonuclease,
deoxy-ribonuclease, or neuraminidase. This suggests
thatproteins arerequiredfor the fusion process,
but viral ribonucleic acid (RNA)orother nucleic
acid species such as
products
of theRNA-de-pendent
deoxyribonucleic
acidpolymerase
(1, 15)
are not. The
sensitivity
tolipase
and etherindi-cates that
lipids
orlipoproteins
may beimpor-tant. However, the
possibilities
that the ethertreatment may inactivate an
important protein
and the lipase may be contaminated with
pro-teases cannot be overlooked. The
integrity
of thephospholipids of the viral membrane has been
showntobe
required
for fusion of cells inducedby
NDV(8).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
WearegratefultoJ.Hartleyand W. Roweforsupplyingthe XC cellsand theMuLV and for many helpful suggestions, T. Pincus andM. Harrisonforpreparingthehomogenatesfor the electronmicrographs,and W. Hall ofElectro-Nucleonics Labo-ratoriesfortakingthemicrographs.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Baltimore, D. 1970. RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of RNAtumorviruses.Nature(London) 226:1209-1211.
2. Bratt, M. A., and W. R. Gallaher.1969. Preliminary analysis ofthe requirements for fusionfromwithin and fusion from without by Newcastle disease virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 64:536-543.
3.Caliguiri, L.A., and I. Tamm.1969.Membranousstructures associated with translationandtranscription of poliovirus RNA.Science166:885-886.
4. Chambers,R.W.,M.C. Bowling,and P. M. Grimley. 1968. Glutaraldehyde fixation in routine histopathology. Arch. Pathol.85:18-30.
5. Hartley, J.W., W. P. Rowe, W. I. Capps, and R. J. Huebner. 1965. Complement fixation and tissue culture assays for mouseleukemia viruses. Proc.Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 53: 931-938.
6. Hartley, J.W., W. R. Rowe, W. I. Capps, and R. J. Huebner. 1969.Isolationofnaturallyoccurring viruses of the murine leukemiavirus group in tissue culture. J. Virol. 3:126-132. 7. Klement,V., W. P. Rowe, J. W. Hartley, and W. E. Pugh. 1969.Mixed culture cytopathogenicity: a new testforgrowth of murine leukemia viruses in tissue culture. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.U.S.A.63:753-758.
8. Kohn, A. 1965. Polykai-yocytosis induced by Newcastle disease virus inmonolayers ofanimalcells. Virology 26: 228-245.
9. Lowry, 0. H., N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall. 1951. Proteinmeasurement with the Folinphenol
reagent.J.Biol. Chem. 193:265-275.
10. Luft, J. H. 1961. Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods.J.Biophys.Biochem.Cytol.9:409-414. 11. Moloney, J. B. 1960. Biological studies on a
lymphoid-leukemia virus extractedfrom sarcoma 37. I. Originand introductory investigations. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 24:933-951.
12. Old,L. J.,E. A. Boyse, G. Geering, and H. F. Oettgen. 1968. Serological approachesto the study of cancer in animals and inman.Cancer Res.28:1288-1299.
13. Rowe, W. P., W. E.Pugh, and J. W. Hartley. 1970. Plaque assaytechniquesfor murine leukemia viruses. Virology 42: 1136-1139.
14.Svoboda,J.1960. Presence of chickentumorvirus in sarcoma of theadultratinoculated afterbirth with Rous sarcoma tissue. Nature (London) 186:980-981.
15.Temin,H.M.,andS. Mizutani.1970. RNA-dependentDNA polymerase in virions of Rous sarcoma virus. Nature (London) 226:1211-1213.
16.Toplin, I. 1967. Purificationof the Moloney and Rauscher murine leukemia viruses by use of zonal centrifugation systems.Appl. Microbiol. 15:582-589.
758 J. VIROL.