PERFORMANCE OF CELLULAR DS-CDMA SYSTEMS USING DISTRIBUTED
ANTENNAS
Lie-Liang Yang WeiFang
School ofECS,University ofSouthampton, S017 1BJ,UK School ofECS,UniversityofSouthampton, S017 1BJ,UK
ABSTRACT theconventional cellular DS-CDMAsystemsusingcentralized
BS antennas. Theproposed distributed antenna cellular DS-In thiscontributionwepropose and investigatea high-capacity CDMA system is capable of providing a platform for possibly cellular DS-CDMA wireless communications system, where integrating the conventional cellular systems into the future ad-numerous antennas are distributed in the area covered by the vanced, high-flexibility, ad-hoc and cooperative wireless net-system. The bit error rate (BER) performance of the dis- works. Furthermore, it may provide an unification platform for tributed antenna cellular DS-CDMA system is investigated, finally merging both wirelesscommunicationsandwired com-when transmission pass-loss, lognormal shadowing slow fad- munications into one, so that high-flexibility and high-quality ing andNakagami-m fastfadingareconsidered. Ourinvestiga- services are available anytime and anywhere.
tion andnumerical results suggestthat the distributed antenna
cellular DS-CDMAsystemconstitutesahighpower-efficiency 1. CELLULAR DS-CDMA SYSTEMWITHDISTRIBUTED
wireless system. For utilizing thesame set ofsystem param- ANTENNAS
eters, itis capable of providing an extremely higher capacity,
than the cellular DS-CDMAsystem builton theconventional A. SystemDescription
cellularconcepts. The novel concepts of the proposed cellular DS-CDMA system
using distributedantennas canbewell-described with the aid of I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 1. It is well-known that, in conventional cellularsystems, each cell is centered around a BS, which may employ a set
Among radio technologies, multiple-input-multiple-output of antennas. Bycontrast, in theproposed distributedantenna (MIMO)systemsusingmultipletransmit and/or receiveanten- aidedcellular systems, as shown in Fig. 1, eachcell has nu-nashave attracted wide research interestsin recent years[1]. In merous sets of antennas, whicharedistributed within the area this contributionacellular DS-CDMAsystemusingdistributed covered by a cell and are connected to the BS using optical antennas isproposed andinvestigated, whereabignumber of fiber. In the distributed antennacellular systemsofFig. 1, the antennas aredistributedintheareacoveredbythesystem. We antennas nearthe bordersmaybe connected withtwo orthree consider the DS-CDMAtechnique, since it has been atypical BSs, so that soft handoffcanbe achieved. In more details, as
multiple-access schemeinthe second and thirdgenerations of shown in Fig. 1, each of the antennas within the dash-dotted wireless communications systems [2], and withoutany doubt, box are, respectively, connected with
BS,
andBS2 of Cell 1 it will constitute an important candidate in the future gener- andCell2, while the antennas within the dashedcircle atthe ations ofwireless communications systems. In theproposed connerjointing Cells 1, 2 and 3 are all connected with BS1, distributedantennacellular DS-CDMAsystem,the distributed BS2 andBS3 of thesecells.antennas areconnected withanumber ofsignal processingcen- In the considered distributed antenna system, for the con-ters,whicharereferredto asbase-stations (BSs), using optical venience of analysis, we assume that the cells are shaped as fibers. Note that, thereason foremphasizing opticalfible in- hexagons with the commonradius ofR. We assumethatany stead ofwireless for implementing communications between apair of adjacent antennas are separatedby a distance of r. distributed antennas and BSs ismainly for the sake ofsaving Hence, each antenna issurroundedbynumerousdistributed an-thehighlylimited wirelessresources. Additionally,westilluse tennas locatedat thecorners ofthelayered hexagons. Specif-theconceptofBS, however, it is nowrathera signalprocess- ically, forthe antenna marked as A3 in Fig. 1, the first layer ing centerthan aconventional BS. The antennas atthe BS of has six antennas, the second layerhas 12 antennas including theproposed systemareassumed have nopriority incompari- the antennalocatedat
BS,,
and so on. Notethat, the structure sonwith the other distributedantennas. The BS isresponsible ofFig. 1issufficientlygeneral forapproximatelymodelingthe for the signal processingof theuserswithin thearea, which is distributed antenna systems having an arbitrary antenna den-coveredbythe distributedantennasconnected with this BS. sity. This can be doneby appropriately changing the radiusInthis contribution wefirst describe the distributedantenna value of R in
Fig.
1.cellular DS-CDMAsystem. Then,theBERperformanceof the Indistributedantennasystemsasshownin
Fig. 1,
we assumecellular DS-CDMAsystemusingdistributedantennasis inves- that the distributed antennas
only
implement
the functions of tigated,when thesimplestcorrelation detector isemployed [3]. conveying asignal
from radiofrequency
(RF)
tobaseband orTheBERperformance isanalyzed andevaluated, when com- from basebandtoRF,inordertomake the
computation
burden municating over compositelognormal shadowing slowfading at adistributedantenna aslowaspossible.
The above assump-and Nakagami-m fast fading channels associated with trans- tion might be due to the size constraint ofthe distributed an-mission pass-loss. Our study shows that, in the distributed tennas and the constraint arising from some supported signal antenna cellular DS-CDMA system, the detection is location processing. Forexample, when advancedmultiuser detection dependent. It issuggested that thedistributed antennacellular (MUD) is employed, information associated with each mobile DS-CDMAsystemconstitutes a high power-efficiency wireless terminal (MT) and with eachantennashould be sharedbyany system. When using the same set of system parameters, the individualprocessor. In this case, using distributed processing proposeddistributedantennacellularDS-CDMA system is ca- in thecontext of eachdistributed antennawouldrequire an ex-pable ofsupporting an extremelyhighernumber of users, than tremelypowerfulnetworkfor conveying theinformationtimelyCell2 ber ofantennaslocated within its
line-of-sight (LoS)
area. Ther--- ~~ ~ ~~ signals sampled from the antennas within the LoS area of the consideredMTusually fall within the clusterof strongest sig-nal. Consequently,the considered MTwillconflict no or light / / ' iA CeX 1,'' \ s \ ,s' Cell3 near-far problem.
0
f -t * B. * *Propagation ChannelModeling
In distributed antenna cellular systems, for any a
given
MT,there are a number of antennas within the LoS area of theMT. This LoS area is referred to as a virtual cell. The antennas
within the virtual cell of aMT are usedto communicate
be-tweenthisMTand its BS. Hence,the
propagation
channelbe-tweenaMTandany of theantennaswithin its virtual cellcan
bewell modeled
by
acomposite shadowing-fading
model[5],
where
(slow)
shadowing
canbe describedby
alognormal
dis-tribution[5],
while(fast)
fading by
aRician orNakagami-m
distribution [6]. Specifically, in this contribution frequency non-selective
Nakagami fading [6]
is used to model the fastfading.
LetMTobe the referenceterminal andassumethat thesignal r 4D 40 0-1-0 0 0 transmitted by the reference terminal
MTo
is being detected. The reference terminal MTo randomly moves within the tri-angle area with three antennas at its corners. For example, Figure 1: Aconceptualcellular DS-CDMA system structure with distributed MT C in Fig 1 randomly moves within the triangle area Sa antennas,where the distributed antennas are connected withone,two or three We assumethat there are U antennas withinthe virtual cellof base-stations(BSs) locatedat the centers of the cellsusing opticalfiber. MTo. Signals collected from these Uantennas areprocessed, in ordertodetect the information transmitted byMTo. Let us now analyze the received signal by the uth antenna, which is andefficiently,
whichmight
notbepractical
in thenearfuture.in
the lcell
o 0sifally,
as
ngthat
(K +1Hence, in our distributed antenna system all
signals
receiveduser
signals
cl that. fromMT0care, receiv
bthe
K thfrom the MTs
by
the distributedantennas areconveyed
totheanennal
th.
ereceivedcletsg
canBSs, where theprocessing iscarried out. Simultaneously, all a
thedistributed antennas arealso used for transmitting signals then be
expressed
asfrom the BSs to theMTs, in orderto improve the down-link K
transmissionquality.
Inthiscontribution, specifically,weconsider andinvestigate
r=t)
= Phobo(t)co(t) + E hthe distributed antenna systems using DS-CDMA signaling. xk 1
Hence,whenconsideringconventional binary phase shift key- b(t-T)C(t- T) +mtl(t) (2) ing (BPSK) baseband modulation, the transmitted DS spread
spectrumsignal,sayby thekth MT,canbeexpressedas where
nu(t)
is thecomplex-valued
additive white Gaussian noise(AWGN) received by the uth receiveantenna,which hasSk(t)
=2Pbk(t)ck(t)
cos(27frt
+Ok)
(1) zero-mean andasingle-sided
spectrumdensity
ofNo
perdi-mension,Tk representsthechanneldelay associated with asyn-where P is the user's transmittedpower,
fJ
is the carrier fre- chronous transmission and propagation, which is assumed to quency, whileOk
denotes the initialphase
angle
associated beuniformly
distributed within[0, Tb).
Furthermore,in(2)
hku
with the carrier modulation. The data stream's waveform represents the channel gain with respect to MTk and the uth an-bk
(t)
=EZ
Qbk[n]
PTb(t
-nTb)
consists of a sequence tenna. The channel gainhku
takes intoaccount both shadowingofmutually independentrectangularpulses of duration Tb and andfading. Hence, it can be expressed as ofamplitudeof+1 or-1, whereTb is the bit duration. Finally,
in
(1)
Ck(t) =E_
ck'T,(t
-j'T)
denotes thesignature hkj=3ukuek
7 (3)sequence waveform of the kth user, where Ckj assumes
val-uesof +1 or-1 withequal probability, whileFTC
(t)
is thechip where, without loss of any generality, the initial phase seen in waveform, which is definedovertheinterval[0,
T,)
and has the (1) and the phase due to channel have been absorbed intoOku,
property offoT
T,(t)dt =T,
and0kuis assumedtobeuniformly distributed in [0, 2X). In(3)Notethat,inthis contributionwe assumethat eachMT em-
/3ku
representsthelognormal
shadowing factor, accountingfor ploys only a single antenna, which is sufficient for fulfill our largescalegeographical variation, whileaEkt,
represents the fast objectives by focusing on the issues of the distributed antenna fading envelope. We assume that the transmission pass-loss is systems. However, our investigation can be extended to the dis- absorbed in the shadowing factorQkl,
so that the mean-square tributed antenna systems that use multiple MT antennas aided value ofaEkt
is unit, i.e., Q F [ce] 1. Furthermore, we by some advanced transmit and receive schemes [4]. Fur- assume that/3k andaEkt
are mutuallyindependentand both of thermore, we assume that thedistributedantenna cellular DS- them are also independent ofOktl.
Antennas in the that the element
nXm
in n is a complexGaussian randomvari-virtual cell Chip-waveform S n able with zero-mean and a variance of
(72
=No/2Eb
per-t)
nmatched-filter
Sp dimension, where Eb PTb represents the energy per bit.,'ri(t) \\ I Letus assume that
Tku=
lkuT, +vku, where 1ku > 0 andT ¢ l 0 < Vku <
T,.
Then,
uponsubstituting
the receivedsignal
r2(t) Data inthe form of
(2)
into(6)
andexpressing
invectorand matrixt) Detection
ott
forms,
itcanbe shown that yucanbeexpressed
as algorithms----]_K
u
(t) Yu =
1houcbo
u[01
+S1
hkuCk
R(Vku)bk
+ nu,(9)
\~~~~* t k=1
wherebk =
[bk
[-11,
bk
[0]]T contains thetwodata bitstrans-mitted by thekthMTwithin
[0, Tb),
while the otherarguments Figure 2: Receiver block diagram for the reference MT in the distributed in (9) aregiven byantennacellular DS-CDMA system. 1 T
Co N
[c,cO
,* *CO(N-1).
density function (PDF) expressedas [6]
Ck(N-1ku
-1)
Ck(Nl-ku)
0 0P12?J) 1
(mn)rmym
exp - Y >0(4)
Ck(N1k2
Ck(Nlk ±1)
0 0ku F (M) Q
Q~ ~~~~1
kN2 C(N)where
F(.)
is the Gammafunction, and, again, mis aparam-Ck1
|Ck(N1)
0 0C°O
eter accounting for thefading severity. In (3)
/3ku
represents Nku=0
0 CkOlthe shadowing, which canbemodeled as lognormal distribu- ko
tion[6]. It canbe shown that
32
alsoobeyslognormaldistri-butionhaving thePDFgivenby [6] 0 0
Ck(lku-2) Ck(lku-1)
pdk1t(r)
exp 0_(og1Or
I'ku)2-
L 0 0 Ck(lku11) Cklku jku
of2
[7Tr2o72
Rp(Vku) 0 1where
10/In
I/
10 = 4.3429, andI'ku
(dB) andor; (dB)/ are R~~~~~(vk~~~~)R(
[)
R~~~~(vk~~~~~)RV
(Vku)
0p(V u
0themeanand standard deviation of10
log1o
r,respectively. Fi- [nally, sinceweassumed that both the fastNakagami-mfading
X0
RV(V)
and the shadowing slow fading are independent random pro- where
Rg,(vk)
and R(vkt) are the chip auto-cesses, hence thePDF ofhku,
2 is simply theproduct of(4)and
(S).
correlation
functions,
which
are definedIas
Rp(s)
=ad5. f-
T,
(t)Tt (t
-s)dt
andRi(s)
=Rp(Tc
-s)
forC. Representation of The ReceivedSignal 0 < s <
Tc,
respectively. The receiverstructurefor detection of the referencesignalfrom Furthermore, letMTo
is showninFig.2. As showninFig.2the receivedsignals = T T TT 10from the Uantennasinthevirtual cell of
MTo
arefirstpassed[Y1,
Y2, ,Yuj (1)through abank offilters matchedtothechip-waveform pulse which collectsall the samples from the U antennasrelatedto ofFTC
(t).
Then, theoutputsof thematched-filtersaresampled the detection ofMTo.Then,y canbeexpressedasat a rate ofI
/Tc.
Hence,incorrespondencewith each databit, Katotal of Nsamples canbe obtained from eachantenna,where
[0]
+ :CkRPkHkbk
+ (Nrepresents the number ofchipsperbitorthespreading fac-
=(Iu
co)h0b0 + tor. Let usconsider the detection of the first data bit transmitted kby
MTo.
Then, theAthsamplewithrespecttothe uthantenna wherecanbeexpressedas n=
FnT
nT
nT]T
(12)(
2P/NT=Y~
Xf±TrU(t)<
s(t-ATdt
(6)iS
anUN-length
Gaussian noisevector,which has zero meanAT
CC
and a covariancematrix
of 22IUN,
0 represents theKro-neckerproduct operation, and the otherarguments in (11)are
whereA =
O0,
1...,N-1; u = 1, 2,...,U,2P/NTb
isa givenasfollows:normalizationfactor, and * represents the complex conjugate.
Th1
0,. ,hU~(3Letho = [o h2.,ho](3
T
~~~~Ck
=diag{Cki,Ck2,.
* CkU} (14)Y=
[YOul,
Y1T,.
,Y(N-)l>u],
(7) Rk diag{RV,(vk1
),RV,(vk2),.
,RX(vi.u)}
(15)III. LOCATION-AWAREDETECTION AND BIT ERROR RATE
In this section we investigate the location-aware detection in
the distributed antenna cellular DS-CDMA systems, where a 100 1.5 U 12 E
20dB
usersignal, sayMTO,is detected based on the observation data Tn bUNO
sampled from the antennas within the considered user'svirtual > 10-1
-cell. Specifically,for the correlation detector, the decision vari-n
l-2
_able for
detecting
bo
[0]
transmittedby
MTo
using
themaximal t 10 ratio combining (MRC)principle[6] can be expressed as 4103
_Zo
=X{o} = Xh{ho
(Iu
XCo)T
y(17)
10-5
-50 whereX{Zo}represents therealpart ofZo.Upon substituting - 0
(I1) into(17), we obtain xjm] 30 20 40 [m]
U K
Zo
hou
hl2bo[0]
+ Z hH(Iu
XCo)T
CkRVkHkbk
tl=1 k=1
+hH
(Iu
0co)
n(18) Figure
4: Single-userbound: BERversuscoordinates(x, y)performance ofthe distributedantennacellular DS-CDMA system supporting single user,It canbe shown that the average BER ofMTo attheloca- when theand usersignal experiences pass-loss, lognormal shadowingslowfading Nakagami-mfastfading.
tion
(x,
y)
canbe computedefficientlyusing a Gauss-Hermite quadrature integration [7],expressedasuF/2
U n areashown inFig.31,
which shows the antennas within thevir-P
fX,2
Y 1 n I Q tual cell ofMTo. Note that the SNR per bit ofEb/No
used inPb : w -
=-
7 yri-=1m
+Las
22m
sin2o thefigures
of this sectionrepresentsthe average SNR per bitatthe MTtransmitter location. Conventionally, when
transmis-0(io
i+M°u(z ))/A m dO (19) sionpass-loss is not considered or ideal power-control is as-/ i sumed, theaverageSNRatthe receiver isusuallyused. Due to the transmissionpath-loss,it can be readily show that the SNR wherew7
i and y are independent of 0, which can be found in measured at the transmitter side is significantly higher than that[7].
measured atthe receiver sidefor a givenvalue oftransmittedpower. IV. EXAMPLES OF PERFORMANCE RESULTS
y
A4 Al2100
/ \\
// \
a
10-1 _
_
A5 A1 ___A 41IS 110-2 m_.,~2E/o2d
--I.
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5
-503\|A\
10-
0 0A7
\/
A8 <A 9
0/
z
\\[ml_~~g
x[m] 50 0 40Y,[m]Figure 3: Antennaswhosesignals maybe collectedfordetection ofMTO, whenMT0is within thefilled area.
Figure 5: Correlation: BER versus coordinates (x,y) performance of In this section we provide arange of results for illustrating thedistributed antenna cellular DS-CDMA system supporting K=10000 users, thacival pefract zeacleva)eper-ormnceo -t zeexep lnc (lstlDut(
of..the.exemplified ..distributed..
-an-Nakagami-m
an- whenusersignals experience pass-loss,fast fading.lognormal
shadowing
slowfading
andtennacellularDS-CDMA system using a set of specific
In Figs. 4 and 5 we evaluated the BER performance of
MTO, when it moved within the triangulararea as marked in
OR=500m,r=
a=b=2,N=31,Eb/No=20dB100m,do=1Om,g=1 OOm Fig.3. Specifically, in the context ofFig. 4, we assumed that 100 1 Om'd '1Om'g' OOmthe distributed antennacellular DS-CDMA system supported 5 U=3
only one user. Hence, the corresponding BER performance ---- U=12
representsthesingle-userBERbound. By contrast,Fig.5 cor- --responds to the distributed antennacellular DS-CDMAsystem
supporting K =10000 users percell.
Fromtheresultsof Figs. 4 and5we canobserve that, indis- L 2 tributedantennacellular DS-CDMAsystems, theBERperfor- . 1
0-2
mancedoesnotchangesignificantly, whena MT moveswithin thesystem,provided that it isnot toocloseto an antenna. How-ever, whenaMTisclosetoanantenna, the receivedpower
by
thisantennawill dominate the achievableBERperformance of 100 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 theMTand theresultantBERislower than thatachieved,when Number of Users in a cell
theMTis faraway fromall theantennas atcertain distances. Comparing the results of Fig. 4 with Fig.5, itcan be shown that, in distributed antennacellularDS-CDMA systems,
mul-tiuse
in*trfer
also degrad
the ahebmBE
eerf-
Figure
7: Correlation: BERversusthe number ofusers,K,
percell for thetisrinefrec.ls,erde
aheabeBRh efr distributedantennacellular DS-CDMA system,whenusersignals experience mance, in, however, ahighly insignificant way uponaccount- pass-loss, lognormal shadowing slow fading andNakagami-m fastfading.ing for K= 10000 userssupportedby thesystem inFig.5. The
results ofFig.5 imply that the transmissionpath-loss has
signif-icantly mitigated the interference imposed by the MTs having BER of 10-2, the distributed antenna cellular DS-CDMA SyS-relatively high distances from the antennasconsidered. tem using a spreading factor of N = 31 is capable of
support-ing uptoK = 10000 toK = 20000 users percell. This high
number ofusers weresupported, whenemploying the simplest correlation detector. Supporting K = 10000 to K = 20000
0a=b=2,R=500m,r=
1OOm,do=
1Om,g=lOOm userspercell is farbeyond
thecapability
ofaconventionalcel-u=3 lular DS-CDMA
system,
when ituses thespreading
factor of10 ---- U=12 N = 31 and employs 91 antennas located atthe BS. This is
f102
because,
in this case, the total number ofdegrees
of freedomUlo-2
/ available at a BS inthe conventional cellular DS-CDMAsys-L_ ' 3 \tem is about 31 x 91 = 2821, which is impossibleto handle
Lolo-3
"''i"N\\\ K = 10000 to K = 20000signals having
asimilar level ofLxlo-4
m=l ,l.5,2,3,wXI~ ,/' "'^'sspowerduetousing
powercontrol.^^o^5 Th ACKNOWLEDGMENT
E ,, I, I,
;;x
|Theauthor would liketoacknowledge
with thanks thefinancial
10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 assistance fromEPSRC of UK.
Eb/No (dB) at the MT position
REFERENCES
[1] I.E.Telatar,"Capacityof multiantenna Gaussianchannels,"European
Figure 6: Single-userbound: BER versus SNR perbit, Eb/No,perfor- TransactionsonTelecommunications,vol. 10,pp.585-595,Nov./Dec.
manceofthe distributedantennacellular DS-CDMA systemsupporting single 1999. user,when theusersignal experiences pass-loss, lognormalshadowingslow
fading and Nakagami-m fast fading. [2] L. Hanzo, L.-L. Yang, E.-L. Kuan, and K. Yen, Single- and Multi-carrier DS-CDMA. JohnWileyand IEEEPress,2003.
In Fig.6 the single-user BER bound versus SNR per bit [3] S.Verdu, Multiuser Detection. Cambridge University Press, 1998. of Eb/NO performance was evaluated in the context of the [4] D. Gesbert, M.Shafi, and et. al, "From theory to practice: An overview
distributed antenna cellular DS-CDMA system for m = ofMIMO space-time coded wirelesssystems," IEEEJournal on
Se-1,1.5, 2,3 and oc, and for U = 3 and U = 12. Explicitly, lected AreasinCommunications, vol. 21,pp.281-302,April 2003.
theBERperformance improves,when the fastfadingbecomes [5] T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications Principles and Practice.
lesssevere, i.e., when the value of thefadingparameterm in- New York: PrenticeHall, Inc, 2 ed., 2002. creases. The detection
aeor
that
usingthesignalscollected from U= 12from U = 3 antennas,
and
the gain [MKSn andM.-S.Alouini, Digital Communication overFading antennas outperforms thtIo nens n n an Channels: A Unified Approach to Performance Analysis. New York: for m =1is about 5dB, while for m -* oois about 3dB, at the John Wiley & Sons, 2000.BER of
i0-3.
In Fg.7 eevluatd th BERwithrespctIn Fl.7 weevaluted teBERwlth espec to te numer oft thenumbr of [7] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, eds., Handbook of Mathematical Functions - withFormulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover users per cell, K, in the contextofthe distributed antenna cel- Publications, INC.,NewYork, 1972.
lular DS-CDMA system using the correlation detection. The
resuls ofFig.resuls oflg.7show hat te BE lncrases,whenlncreslngsho tha theBER icreaes, hen ncresing [8] L.-L. Yang and L. Hanzo, "Performance of generalized multicarrierDS-CDMA over Nakagami-m fading channels," IEEE Transactions on