3.1.1 Movement Frequency- Phasic hand activation
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA
Coding
Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group
Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb
Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral
CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
SS Degr. of
Freedom
MS F p
Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error
CM*LC CM*LC*group Error
LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error
224.7223 1 224.7223 4934.847 0.000000 0.2893 1 0.2893 6.352 0.017703
1.2751 28 0.0455
0.0106 1 0.0106 10.445 0.003140
0.0040 1 0.0040 3.937 0.057123
0.0285 28 0.0010
0.3095 1 0.3095 7.582 0.010234 0.2950 1 0.2950 7.227 0.011954
1.1431 28 0.0408
0.0727 1 0.0727 7.343 0.011363
0.0386 1 0.0386 3.892 0.058465
0.2774 28 0.0099
0.0043 1 0.0043 7.162 0.012304 0.0025 1 0.0025 4.202 0.049855
0.0167 28 0.0006
0.0019 1 0.0019 5.588 0.025261
0.0010 1 0.0010 3.086 0.089885
0.0094 28 0.0003
0.0418 1 0.0418 5.330 0.028553 0.0341 1 0.0341 4.341 0.046463
0.2198 28 0.0078
0.0030 1 0.0030 5.705 0.023897 0.0023 1 0.0023 4.367 0.045853
0.0147 28 0.0005
Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
Degr. of Freedom
F p H-F
Epsilon
H-F Adj. df1
H-F Adj. df2
H-F Adj. p
Lowr.Bnd Epsilon
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2
L
LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error
CM*LC CM*LC*group Error
LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error
1 10.44549 0.003140 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.003140 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 3.93673 0.057123 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.057123 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 7.58243 0.010234 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.010234 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 7.22723 0.011954 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.011954 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 7.34256 0.011363 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.011363 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 3.89195 0.058465 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.058465 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 7.16192 0.012304 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.012304 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.20168 0.049855 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.049855 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 5.58757 0.025261 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025261 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 3.08632 0.089885 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.089885 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 5.33042 0.028553 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.028553 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.34055 0.046463 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.046463 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 5.70522 0.023897 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.023897 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.36672 0.045853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.045853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.3521, p=.01770
Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
group 0.86
0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06
DV
_
1
LIMB; LS Means
Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.445, p=.00314 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LIMB 0.88
0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06
DV
_
1
CM; LS Means
Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.5824, p=.01023 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
CM 0.80
0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10
DV
_
1
CM*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.2272, p=.01195
Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
group 1 group 2
1 2
CM 0.6
0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
DV
_
1
LC; LS Mea ns
Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.3426, p=.01136 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LC 0.86
0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06
DV
_
1
LIMB*CM; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.1619, p=.01230
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2
1 2
LIMB 0.82
0.84 0.86 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06
DV
_
1
LIMB*CM*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.2017, p=.04985
Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
group 1 group 2 L IMB: 1
CM: 1 2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
DV
_
1
LIMB: 2
CM: 1 2
LIMB*LC; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5876, p=.02526
Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
LC 1 LC 2
1 2
LIMB 0.86
0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06
DV
_
1
CM*LC; LS Mea ns Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.3304, p=.02855
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2
1 2
LC 0.75
0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10
DV
_
1
CM*LC*gr oup; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3405, p=.04646
Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
group 1 group 2 LC: 1
CM: 1 2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
DV
_
1
LC: 2
CM: 1 2
LIMB*CM*LC; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.7052, p=.02390
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2 LIMB: 1
LC: 1 2
0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05
DV
_
1
LIMB: 2
LC: 1 2
LIMB*CM*LC*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585
Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
group 1 group 2 LC: 1
CM: 1 2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
DV
_
1
LC: 2
CM: 1 2
Factors: Levels LIMB: 1
LIMB*CM*LC*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585
Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
group 1 group 2 LC: 1
CM: 1 2
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
DV
_
1
LC: 2
CM: 1 2
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01080, df = 55.83
Cell No.
group CM {1}
1.0039
{2} .86196
{3} 1.0032
{4} 1.0015 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.003439 0.999998 0.999920 1 2 0.003439 0.002625 0.006688
2 1 0.999998 0.002625 0.999968
2 2 0.999920 0.006688 0.999968
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = .00060, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB CM {1}
1.0011
{2} .92086
{3} 1.0060
{4} .94261 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.000164 0.697604 0.000164
1 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.000356
2 1 0.697604 0.000164 0.000164
2 2 0.000164 0.000356 0.000164
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01153, df = 28.734
Cell No.
group LIMB CM {1}
1.0006
{2} .84376
{3} 1.0072
{4} .88015
{5} 1.0016
{6} .99796
{7} 1.0048
{8} 1.0051 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.000142 0.963402 0.000142 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000215 0.007987 0.135893 0.006512 0.006398
1 2 1 0.963402 0.000142 0.000142 1.000000 0.999997 1.000000 1.000000
1 2 2 0.000142 0.000215 0.000142 0.072369 0.088492 0.060634 0.345456
2 1 1 1.000000 0.007987 1.000000 0.072369 0.998863 0.999580 0.999280
2 1 2 1.000000 0.135893 0.999997 0.088492 0.998863 0.954931 0.944957
2 2 1 1.000000 0.006512 1.000000 0.060634 0.999580 0.954931 1.000000
2 2 2 1.000000 0.006398 1.000000 0.345456 0.999280 0.944957 1.000000
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01147, df = 28.412
Cell No.
group LIMB LC {1}
.88723
{2} .95715
{3} .91846
{4} .96889
{5} .99434
{6} 1.0052
{7} 1.0009
{8} 1.0090 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.000142 0.000148 0.000142 0.534478 0.086300 0.108707 0.070426 1 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.243245 0.977740 0.986266 0.947081 0.881778 1 2 1 0.000148 0.000142 0.000142 0.536410 0.370616 0.802824 0.320868 1 2 2 0.000142 0.243245 0.000142 0.997709 0.980393 0.990567 0.995376
2 1 1 0.534478 0.977740 0.536410 0.997709 0.325326 0.853992 0.074493
2 1 2 0.086300 0.986266 0.370616 0.980393 0.325326 0.981964 0.992740
2 2 1 0.108707 0.947081 0.802824 0.990567 0.853992 0.981964 0.687701
2 2 2 0.070426 0.881778 0.320868 0.995376 0.074493 0.992740 0.687701
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = .00785, df = 28.000
Cell No.
CM LC {1}
.99936
{2} 1.0078
{3} .90112
{4} .96235 1
2
1 1 0.953633 0.000170 0.125251
1 2 0.953633 0.000165 0.042189
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01335, df = 37.374
Cell No.
group CM LC {1}
.99894
{2} 1.0089
{3} .80675
{4} .91716
{5} .99977
{6} 1.0067
{7} .99549
{8} 1.0075 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.999838 0.000142 0.024753 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999
1 1 2 0.999838 0.000142 0.008584 0.999999 1.000000 0.999982 1.000000
1 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.001139 0.001316 0.000857 0.035166 0.000814
1 2 2 0.024753 0.008584 0.001139 0.522016 0.420499 0.587371 0.723016
2 1 1 1.000000 0.999999 0.001316 0.522016 0.999986 0.999999 0.999969
2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.000857 0.420499 0.999986 0.999647 1.000000
2 2 1 1.000000 0.999982 0.035166 0.587371 0.999999 0.999647 0.999422
2 2 2 0.999999 1.000000 0.000814 0.723016 0.999969 1.000000 0.999422
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = .00052, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB CM LC {1}
.99766
{2} 1.0046
{3} .88392
{4} .95779
{5} 1.0011
{6} 1.0109
{7} .91832
{8} .96690 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.932520 0.000142 0.000146 0.998965 0.355805 0.000142 0.000495
1 1 2 0.932520 0.000142 0.000142 0.998641 0.957420 0.000142 0.000158
1 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000205 0.000142
1 2 2 0.000146 0.000142 0.000142 0.000143 0.000142 0.000146 0.779071
2 1 1 0.998965 0.998641 0.000142 0.000143 0.704062 0.000142 0.000213
2 1 2 0.355805 0.957420 0.000142 0.000142 0.704062 0.000142 0.000143
2 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000205 0.000146 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142
2 2 2 0.000495 0.000158 0.000142 0.779071 0.000213 0.000143 0.000142
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02303, df = 28.644
Cell No.
group LIMB CM LC {1}
.99740
{2} 1.0038
{3} .77707
{4} .91045
{5} 1.0005
{6} 1.0139
{7} .83643
{8} .92387
{9} .99791
{10 1.00 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 1 1 1 0.999980 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 0.818897 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000
1 1 1 2 0.999980 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 0.996510 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000
1 1 2 1 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000151 0.000146 0.028455 0.020
1 1 2 2 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.953960 0.959983 0.926
1 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.000146 0.000146 0.953879 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000
1 2 1 2 0.818897 0.996510 0.000146 0.000146 0.953879 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000
1 2 2 1 0.000146 0.000146 0.000151 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.267315 0.210 1 2 2 2 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.953960 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.990470 0.977
2 1 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.028455 0.959983 1.000000 1.000000 0.267315 0.990470 0.999
2 1 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.020616 0.926525 1.000000 1.000000 0.210803 0.977576 0.999881
2 1 2 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.354348 0.980174 1.000000 1.000000 0.330664 0.996470 0.999929 0.915
2 1 2 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.020813 0.996182 1.000000 1.000000 0.212318 0.978080 0.999917 1.000
2 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.024239 0.945014 1.000000 1.000000 0.237894 0.985096 1.000000 1.000
2 2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.018393 0.911384 1.000000 1.000000 0.193150 0.970806 0.996545 1.000
2 2 2 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.025771 0.951134 1.000000 1.000000 0.749669 0.987375 1.000000 0.999
2 2 2 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.016870 0.898772 1.000000 1.000000 0.180673 0.998598 0.981249 1.000
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02303, df = 28.644
Cell No.
group LIMB CM LC {9}
.99791
{10} 1.0054
{11} .99077
{12} 1.0051
{13} 1.0016
{14} 1.0080
{15} 1.0002
{16} 1.0099 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 1 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000
1 1 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000
1 1 2 1 0.028455 0.020616 0.354348 0.020813 0.024239 0.018393 0.025771 0.016870
1 1 2 2 0.959983 0.926525 0.980174 0.996182 0.945014 0.911384 0.951134 0.898772
1 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000
1 2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000
1 2 2 1 0.267315 0.210803 0.330664 0.212318 0.237894 0.193150 0.749669 0.180673
1 2 2 2 0.990470 0.977576 0.996470 0.978080 0.985096 0.970806 0.987375 0.998598
2 1 1 1 0.999881 0.999929 0.999917 1.000000 0.996545 1.000000 0.981249
2 1 1 2 0.999881 0.915947 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 1.000000
2 1 2 1 0.999929 0.915947 0.924234 0.992632 0.774960 0.998230 0.631263
2 1 2 2 0.999917 1.000000 0.924234 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 1.000000
2 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.992632 1.000000 0.999984 1.000000 0.999568
2 2 1 2 0.996545 1.000000 0.774960 1.000000 0.999984 0.999804 1.000000
2 2 2 1 1.000000 0.999999 0.998230 0.999999 1.000000 0.999804 0.997547
2 2 2 2 0.981249 1.000000 0.631263 1.000000 0.999568 1.000000 0.997547
group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.3521, p=.01770
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.932931 0.019480 0.893028 0.972835 15 2 1.002365 0.019480 0.962461 1.042268 15
LIMB; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.445, p=.00314
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.960992 0.013686 0.932958 0.989026 30 2 0.974304 0.014166 0.945287 1.003321 30
LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.9367, p=.05712
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.922189 0.019355 0.882543 0.961836 15
1 2 0.943673 0.020033 0.902637 0.984709 15
2 1 0.999795 0.019355 0.960149 1.039441 15
2 2 1.004935 0.020033 0.963899 1.045971 15
CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.5824, p=.01023
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 1 1.003561 0.005933 0.991408 1.015715 30
CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.2272, p=.01195
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 1.003907 0.008391 0.986719 1.021094 15
1 2 0.861956 0.036999 0.786166 0.937746 15
2 1 1.003216 0.008391 0.986028 1.020404 15
2 2 1.001514 0.036999 0.925724 1.077303 15
LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.3426, p=.01136
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.950238 0.016791 0.915844 0.984633 30 2 0.985058 0.013420 0.957567 1.012549 30
LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.8919, p=.05847
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.902846 0.023746 0.854205 0.951487 15
1 2 0.963016 0.018979 0.924139 1.001894 15
2 1 0.997630 0.023746 0.948989 1.046271 15
2 2 1.007099 0.018979 0.968222 1.045977 15
LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.1619, p=.01230
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 1.001127 0.005795 0.989256 1.012997 30
1 2 0.920858 0.026268 0.867051 0.974665 30
2 1 1.005996 0.006198 0.993301 1.018691 30
2 2 0.942612 0.026539 0.888250 0.996974 30
LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.2017, p=.04985
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 1.000619 0.008195 0.983832 1.017406 15
1 1 2 0.843760 0.037148 0.767666 0.919854 15
1 2 1 1.007194 0.008765 0.989241 1.025148 15
1 2 2 0.880152 0.037531 0.803273 0.957031 15
2 1 1 1.001634 0.008195 0.984847 1.018422 15
2 1 2 0.997956 0.037148 0.921862 1.074050 15
2 2 1 1.004798 0.008765 0.986844 1.022752 15
2 2 2 1.005071 0.037531 0.928192 1.081951 15
LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5876, p=.02526
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.940788 0.016875 0.906221 0.975356 30
1 2 0.981196 0.013108 0.954347 1.008046 30
2 1 0.959688 0.017241 0.924372 0.995004 30
2 2 0.988920 0.013886 0.960476 1.017363 30
LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.0863, p=.08989
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.887234 0.023865 0.838348 0.936120 15
1 1 2 0.957145 0.018537 0.919174 0.995116 15
1 2 1 0.918459 0.024382 0.868515 0.968403 15
1 2 2 0.968887 0.019637 0.928662 1.009113 15
2 1 1 0.994343 0.023865 0.945457 1.043229 15
2 1 2 1.005247 0.018537 0.967276 1.043218 15
2 2 1 1.000917 0.024382 0.950973 1.050861 15
2 2 2 1.008952 0.019637 0.968726 1.049177 15
CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Par Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.3304, p=.02855
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.999355 0.006883 0.985257 1.013454 30
1 2 1.007767 0.005990 0.995497 1.020038 30
2 1 0.901121 0.032470 0.834609 0.967633 30
2 2 0.962348 0.024449 0.912267 1.012430 30
CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3405, p=.04646
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.998940 0.009734 0.979002 1.018879 15
1 1 2 1.008873 0.008471 0.991520 1.026226 15
1 2 1 0.806752 0.045920 0.712690 0.900814 15
1 2 2 0.917160 0.034576 0.846334 0.987985 15
2 1 1 0.999770 0.009734 0.979832 1.019709 15
2 1 2 1.006662 0.008471 0.989309 1.024014 15
2 2 1 0.995490 0.045920 0.901428 1.089552 15
2 2 2 1.007537 0.034576 0.936711 1.078363 15
LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.7052, p=.02390
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.997655 0.007016 0.983283 1.012027 30
1 1 2 1.004598 0.005557 0.993215 1.015982 30
1 2 1 0.883922 0.032936 0.816456 0.951387 30
1 2 2 0.957794 0.024156 0.908313 1.007275 30
2 1 1 1.001056 0.006852 0.987020 1.015091 30
2 1 2 1.010937 0.006761 0.997087 1.024786 30
2 2 1 0.918321 0.033065 0.850590 0.986052 30
2 2 2 0.966903 0.024875 0.915949 1.017856 30
LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 1 1 1 0.997398 0.009922 0.977073 1.017722 15
1 1 1 2 1.003841 0.007859 0.987742 1.019939 15
1 1 2 1 0.777070 0.046578 0.681659 0.872481 15
1 1 2 2 0.910450 0.034162 0.840473 0.980427 15
1 2 1 1 1.000483 0.009690 0.980634 1.020332 15
1 2 1 2 1.013906 0.009562 0.994319 1.033492 15
1 2 2 1 0.836435 0.046761 0.740649 0.932221 15
1 2 2 2 0.923869 0.035178 0.851811 0.995928 15
2 1 1 1 0.997913 0.009922 0.977588 1.018237 15
2 1 1 2 1.005356 0.007859 0.989257 1.021455 15
2 1 2 1 0.990773 0.046578 0.895362 1.086184 15
2 1 2 2 1.005138 0.034162 0.935161 1.075115 15
3.1.2 Movement Frequency- Tonic hand activation
2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA
Caption
Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group
Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral
Direction: 1= DF, 2= PF
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
SS Degr. of
Freedom
MS F p
Intercept group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error
126.3592 1 126.3592 5044.050 0.000000
0.0185 1 0.0185 0.737 0.397872
0.7014 28 0.0251
0.0231 1 0.0231 1.725 0.199688
0.0103 1 0.0103 0.770 0.387757
0.3742 28 0.0134
0.0000 1 0.0000 0.021 0.885827
0.0017 1 0.0017 2.643 0.115207
0.0178 28 0.0006
Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
Degr. of Freedom
F p H-F
Epsilon
H-F Adj. df1
H-F Adj. df2
H-F Adj. p
Lowr.Bnd Epsilon
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2
Lowr.Bn Adj. p CM
CM*group Error LC LC*group Error CM*LC CM*LC*group Error
1 1.725192 0.199688 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.199688 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.199
1 0.769761 0.387757 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.387757 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.387
28
1 0.020996 0.885827 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.885827 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.885
1 2.643058 0.115207 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.115207 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.115
28
1 0.270612 0.607011 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.607011 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.607
1 0.985632 0.329315 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.329315 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.329
28
group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.73713, p=.39787
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 1.038560 0.020433 0.996704 1.080415 15 2 1.013750 0.020433 0.971894 1.055605 15
CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.7252, p=.19969
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 1.040016 0.024601 0.989624 1.090409 30 2 1.012293 0.005922 1.000163 1.024423 30
CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.76976, p=.38776
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 1.061681 0.034791 0.990415 1.132946 15
1 2 1.015439 0.008375 0.998284 1.032594 15
2 1 1.018352 0.034791 0.947086 1.089618 15
2 2 1.009147 0.008375 0.991993 1.026302 15
LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.02100, p=.88583
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 1.025821 0.015312 0.994455 1.057187 30 2 1.026489 0.013916 0.997982 1.054995 30
LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.6431, p=.11521
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 1.041971 0.021655 0.997613 1.086330 15
1 2 1.035148 0.019681 0.994834 1.075462 15
2 1 1.009671 0.021655 0.965312 1.054029 15
2 2 1.017829 0.019681 0.977515 1.058143 15
CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Par Current effect: F(1, 28)=.27061, p=.60701
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 1.041189 0.027771 0.984302 1.098075 30
1 2 1.038844 0.022008 0.993762 1.083926 30
2 1 1.010453 0.005366 0.999462 1.021445 30
2 2 1.014133 0.007134 0.999519 1.028747 30
CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.98563, p=.32931
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 1.069472 0.039274 0.989022 1.149922 15
1 1 2 1.053889 0.031124 0.990133 1.117644 15
1 2 1 1.014470 0.007589 0.998926 1.030015 15
1 2 2 1.016408 0.010090 0.995740 1.037075 15
2 1 1 1.012905 0.039274 0.932455 1.093355 15
2 1 2 1.023799 0.031124 0.960044 1.087555 15
2 2 1 1.006436 0.007589 0.990892 1.021981 15
2 2 2 1.011858 0.010090 0.991191 1.032526 15
3.2.1 Variability of Movement Frequency- Phasic hand activation
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA
Caption
Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group
Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb
Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral
CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
SS Degr. of
Freedom
MS F p
Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error
CM*LC CM*LC*group Error
LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error
2.374518 1 2.374518 521.5053 0.000000
0.002810 1 0.002810 0.6171 0.438709
0.127490 28 0.004553
0.016394 1 0.016394 10.2126 0.003442
0.005855 1 0.005855 3.6476 0.066443
0.044947 28 0.001605
0.004268 1 0.004268 2.0188 0.166405
0.001332 1 0.001332 0.6302 0.433956
0.059194 28 0.002114
0.009325 1 0.009325 4.4347 0.044309
0.000760 1 0.000760 0.3614 0.552578
0.058873 28 0.002103
0.005568 1 0.005568 5.2894 0.029120
0.000325 1 0.000325 0.3086 0.582978
0.029475 28 0.001053
0.014155 1 0.014155 19.0892 0.000155
0.001716 1 0.001716 2.3136 0.139457
0.020763 28 0.000742
0.017690 1 0.017690 9.7870 0.004078
0.002756 1 0.002756 1.5247 0.227168
0.050610 28 0.001807
0.010650 1 0.010650 8.8939 0.005869
0.000841 1 0.000841 0.7024 0.409070
0.033529 28 0.001197
Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
Degr. of Freedom
F p H-F
Epsilon
H-F Adj. df1
H-F Adj. df2
H-F Adj. p
Lowr.Bnd Epsilon
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2
L
LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
1 10.21258 0.003442 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.003442 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 3.64761 0.066443 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.066443 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 2.01879 0.166405 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.166405 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.63021 0.433956 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.433956 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 4.43471 0.044309 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.044309 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.36138 0.552578 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.552578 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 5.28943 0.029120 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.029120 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.30856 0.582978 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.582978 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
LIMB; LS Means
Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.213, p=.00344 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LIMB 0.07
0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14
DV
_
1
LC; LS Mea ns
Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.4347, p=.04431 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LC 0.06
0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14
DV
_
1
LIMB*CM; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2894, p=.02912
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2
1 2
LIMB 0.07
0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16
DV
_
1
LIMB*LC; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 28)=19.089, p=.00016
Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
LC 1 LC 2
1 2
LIMB 0.07
0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16
DV
_
1
CM*LC; LS Mea ns Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.7870, p=.00408
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2
1 2
LC 0.06
0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16
DV
_
1
LIMB*CM*LC; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.8939, p=.00587
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2 LIMB: 1
LC: 1 2
0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20
DV
_
1
LIMB: 2
LC: 1 2
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = .00105, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB CM {1}
.09180
{2} .09060
{3} .09870
{4} .11677 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.997061 0.653858 0.001393
1 2 0.997061 0.529985 0.000871
2 1 0.653858 0.529985 0.024234
2 2 0.001393 0.000871 0.024234
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = .00074, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB LC {1}
.08976
{2} .09265
{3} .12165
{4} .09382 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.936755 0.000166 0.845860
1 2 0.936755 0.000175 0.995374
2 1 0.000166 0.000175 0.000187
2 2 0.845860 0.995374 0.000187
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = .00181, df = 28.000
Cell No.
CM LC {1}
.09290
{2} .09760
{3} .11850
{4} .08887 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.929372 0.013398 0.953770
1 2 0.929372 0.054419 0.677228
2 1 0.013398 0.054419 0.003705
2 2 0.953770 0.677228 0.003705
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = .00120, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB CM LC {1}
.08843
{2} .09517
{3} .09108
{4} .09013
{5} .09736
{6} .10003
{7} .14593
{8} .08761 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.994215 0.999988 0.999999 0.970708 0.891917 0.000157 1.000000
1 1 2 0.994215 0.999769 0.999090 0.999997 0.999287 0.000235 0.988493
1 2 1 0.999988 0.999769 1.000000 0.996246 0.970357 0.000170 0.999923
1 2 2 0.999999 0.999090 1.000000 0.991132 0.949504 0.000164 0.999991
2 1 1 0.970708 0.999997 0.996246 0.991132 0.999987 0.000326 0.953249
2 1 2 0.891917 0.999287 0.970357 0.949504 0.999987 0.000566 0.853866
2 2 1 0.000157 0.000235 0.000170 0.000164 0.000326 0.000566 0.000154
2 2 2 1.000000 0.988493 0.999923 0.999991 0.953249 0.853866 0.000154
group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=.61714, p=.43871
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.102889 0.006160 0.090272 0.115507 15 2 0.096046 0.006160 0.083428 0.108664 15
LIMB; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.213, p=.00344
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.091203 0.002981 0.085097 0.097308 30 2 0.107733 0.006514 0.094389 0.121077 30
LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.6476, p=.06644
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.089685 0.004215 0.081051 0.098320 15
1 2 0.116094 0.009213 0.097222 0.134965 15
2 1 0.092721 0.004215 0.084086 0.101355 15
2 2 0.099371 0.009213 0.080500 0.118243 15
CM; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.0188, p=.16640
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.095251 0.003415 0.088256 0.102246 30 2 0.103685 0.006626 0.090112 0.117257 30
CM*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.63021, p=.43396
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.096316 0.004829 0.086424 0.106208 15
1 2 0.109463 0.009370 0.090269 0.128656 15
2 1 0.094185 0.004829 0.084293 0.104077 15
2 2 0.097907 0.009370 0.078713 0.117101 15
LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.4347, p=.04431
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.105701 0.005910 0.093594 0.117807 30 2 0.093235 0.004531 0.083952 0.102517 30
LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.36138, p=.55258
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.110902 0.008358 0.093781 0.128023 15
1 2 0.094877 0.006408 0.081750 0.108004 15
2 1 0.100500 0.008358 0.083379 0.117621 15
2 2 0.091592 0.006408 0.078465 0.104719 15
LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2894, p=.02912
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.091803 0.003102 0.085448 0.098157 30
1 2 0.090603 0.004067 0.082272 0.098934 30
2 1 0.098699 0.004543 0.089393 0.108005 30
2 2 0.116766 0.010422 0.095418 0.138114 30
LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.30856, p=.58298
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.089092 0.004387 0.080106 0.098079 15
1 1 2 0.090278 0.005752 0.078496 0.102061 15
1 2 1 0.103540 0.006425 0.090380 0.116701 15
1 2 2 0.128647 0.014739 0.098456 0.158838 15
2 1 1 0.094513 0.004387 0.085526 0.103500 15
2 1 2 0.090928 0.005752 0.079146 0.102710 15
2 2 1 0.093857 0.006425 0.080696 0.107018 15
2 2 2 0.104886 0.014739 0.074695 0.135076 15
LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=19.089, p=.00016
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.089756 0.004022 0.081517 0.097995 30
1 2 0.092650 0.003753 0.084961 0.100338 30
2 1 0.121645 0.009329 0.102536 0.140755 30
2 2 0.093820 0.005722 0.082098 0.105541 30
LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.3136, p=.13946
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.087344 0.005688 0.075693 0.098996 15
1 1 2 0.092026 0.005308 0.081154 0.102899 15
1 2 1 0.134460 0.013193 0.107434 0.161485 15
1 2 2 0.097728 0.008093 0.081150 0.114305 15
2 1 1 0.092168 0.005688 0.080516 0.103820 15
2 1 2 0.093273 0.005308 0.082400 0.104146 15
2 2 1 0.108831 0.013193 0.081806 0.135857 15
2 2 2 0.089911 0.008093 0.073334 0.106489 15
CM*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.7870, p=.00408
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 1 1 0.092899 0.003753 0.085211 0.100586 30
CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.5247, p=.22717
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.092355 0.005307 0.081484 0.103226 15
1 1 2 0.100278 0.006139 0.087703 0.112853 15
1 2 1 0.129449 0.014517 0.099711 0.159187 15
1 2 2 0.089476 0.008716 0.071622 0.107330 15
2 1 1 0.093442 0.005307 0.082571 0.104314 15
2 1 2 0.094928 0.006139 0.082353 0.107503 15
2 2 1 0.107557 0.014517 0.077820 0.137295 15
2 2 2 0.088256 0.008716 0.070403 0.106110 15
LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.8939, p=.00587
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.088432 0.003305 0.081662 0.095202 30
1 1 2 0.095173 0.004279 0.086409 0.103937 30
1 2 1 0.091080 0.006608 0.077545 0.104616 30
1 2 2 0.090126 0.005487 0.078887 0.101365 30
2 1 1 0.097365 0.005008 0.087106 0.107624 30
2 1 2 0.100033 0.005650 0.088460 0.111606 30
2 2 1 0.145926 0.017051 0.111000 0.180852 30
2 2 2 0.087606 0.007422 0.072402 0.102810 30
LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.70242, p=.40907
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 1 1 1 0.083311 0.004674 0.073737 0.092885 15
1 1 1 2 0.094874 0.006051 0.082479 0.107268 15
1 1 2 1 0.091378 0.009345 0.072236 0.110520 15
1 1 2 2 0.089179 0.007759 0.073285 0.105073 15
1 2 1 1 0.101399 0.007083 0.086890 0.115908 15
1 2 1 2 0.105682 0.007990 0.089316 0.122049 15
1 2 2 1 0.167520 0.024113 0.118127 0.216914 15
1 2 2 2 0.089773 0.010497 0.068272 0.111275 15
2 1 1 1 0.093553 0.004674 0.083979 0.103127 15
2 1 1 2 0.095473 0.006051 0.083078 0.107867 15
2 1 2 1 0.090783 0.009345 0.071641 0.109925 15
2 1 2 2 0.091073 0.007759 0.075179 0.106967 15
3.2.2 Variability of Movement Frequency- Tonic hand activation
2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA
Caption
Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group
Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral
Direction: 1= DF, 2= PF
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
SS Degr. of
Freedom
MS F p
Intercept group Error DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error
LC LC*group Error
DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error
1.320912 1 1.320912 844.8767 0.000000
0.000733 1 0.000733 0.4687 0.499231
0.043776 28 0.001563
0.007501 1 0.007501 5.5468 0.025755
0.000183 1 0.000183 0.1352 0.715853
0.037864 28 0.001352
0.000052 1 0.000052 0.0362 0.850454
0.000188 1 0.000188 0.1302 0.720902
0.040436 28 0.001444
0.000322 1 0.000322 0.3088 0.582843
0.000444 1 0.000444 0.4258 0.519384
0.029225 28 0.001044
Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
Degr. of Freedom
F p H-F
Epsilon
H-F Adj. df1
H-F Adj. df2
H-F Adj. p
Lowr.Bnd Epsilon
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2
L
DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error
LC LC*group Error
DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error
1 5.546761 0.025755 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025755 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.135212 0.715853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.715853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 0.036211 0.850454 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.850454 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.130230 0.720902 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.720902 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 0.308780 0.582843 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.582843 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.425789 0.519384 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.519384 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
DIRECTIO; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5468, p=.02575
Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
DIRECTIO 0.08
0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14
DV
_
1
group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=.46866, p=.49923
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.102446 0.005105 0.091990 0.112902 15 2 0.107388 0.005105 0.096932 0.117845 15
DIRECTIO; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5468, p=.02575
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
DIRECTIO DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.112823 0.005643 0.101265 0.124382 30 2 0.097011 0.004093 0.088626 0.105396 30
DIRECTIO*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13521, p=.71585
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DIRECTIO DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.111587 0.007980 0.095240 0.127933 15
1 2 0.093306 0.005789 0.081448 0.105164 15
2 1 0.114060 0.007980 0.097714 0.130406 15
2 2 0.100716 0.005789 0.088858 0.112574 15
LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.03621, p=.85045
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 0.104257 0.004723 0.094583 0.113931 30 2 0.105577 0.005275 0.094772 0.116382 30
LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13023, p=.72090
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.103038 0.006679 0.089357 0.116719 15
1 2 0.101854 0.007460 0.086574 0.117135 15
2 1 0.105476 0.006679 0.091795 0.119157 15
2 2 0.109300 0.007460 0.094020 0.124581 15
DIRECTIO*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.30878, p=.58284
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
DIRECTIO LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 0.113802 0.007608 0.098218 0.129385 30
1 2 0.111844 0.008207 0.095033 0.128656 30
2 1 0.094712 0.004706 0.085073 0.104351 30
2 2 0.099310 0.005722 0.087589 0.111031 30
DIRECTIO*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.42579, p=.51938
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DIRECTIO LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.115742 0.010759 0.093703 0.137780 15
1 1 2 0.107431 0.011607 0.083656 0.131207 15
1 2 1 0.090334 0.006655 0.076702 0.103966 15
1 2 2 0.096277 0.008092 0.079701 0.112854 15
2 1 1 0.111862 0.010759 0.089824 0.133901 15
2 1 2 0.116257 0.011607 0.092482 0.140033 15
2 2 1 0.099090 0.006655 0.085458 0.112722 15
2 2 2 0.102343 0.008092 0.085766 0.118919 15
3.3.1 Movement Amplitude- Phasic hand activation
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA
Caption
Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group
Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb
Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral
CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Amplitude_No TMS in Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
SS Degr. of
Freedom
MS F p
Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error
CM*LC CM*LC*group Error
LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error
1317678 1 1317678 1189.085 0.000000 5777 1 5777 5.213 0.030204
31028 28 1108
128525 1 128525 225.039 0.000000 5602 1 5602 9.809 0.004042
15991 28 571
7504 1 7504 40.748 0.000001
265 1 265 1.442 0.239927
5156 28 184
922 1 922 20.491 0.000101
39 1 39 0.872 0.358491
1260 28 45
3127 1 3127 34.792 0.000002
177 1 177 1.969 0.171498
2516 28 90
258 1 258 9.503 0.004573
2 1 2 0.064 0.802300
760 28 27
7 1 7 0.159 0.693129
49 1 49 1.052 0.313903
1310 28 47
258 1 258 8.363 0.007327
2 1 2 0.077 0.783252
865 28 31
Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
Degr. of Freedom
F p H-F
Epsilon
H-F Adj. df1
H-F Adj. df2
H-F Adj. p
Lowr.Bnd Epsilon
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2
L
LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
1 225.0389 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 9.8094 0.004042 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.004042 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 40.7484 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 1.4417 0.239927 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.239927 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 20.4911 0.000101 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000101 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.8716 0.358491 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.358491 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 34.7916 0.000002 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000002 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 1.9695 0.171498 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.171498 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2135, p=.03020
Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
group 60
65 70 75 80 85 90
DV
_
1
LIMB; LS Means
Current effect: F(1, 28)=225.04, p=.00000 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LIMB 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
DV
_
1
LIMB*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.8094, p=.00404
Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
group 1 group 2
1 2
LIMB 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
DV
_
1
CM; LS Means
Current effect: F(1, 28)=40.748, p=.00000 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
CM 55
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
DV
_
1
LC; LS Mea ns
Current effect: F(1, 28)=20.491, p=.00010 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LC 60
65 70 75 80 85 90
DV
_
1
LIMB*CM; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=34.792, p=.00000
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2
1 2
LIMB 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
DV
_
1
LIMB*LC; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.5031, p=.00457
Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
LC 1 LC 2
1 2
LIMB 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
DV
_
1
LIMB*CM*LC; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.3630, p=.00733
Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals
CM 1 CM 2 LIMB: 1
LC: 1 2
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
DV
_
1
LIMB: 2
LC: 1 2
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in P Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 209.91, df = 50.80
Cell No.
group LIMB {1}
106.98
{2} 51.030
{3} 87.500
{4} 50.881 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.000164 0.016816 0.000164
1 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.999995 2 1 0.016816 0.000164 0.000164
2 2 0.000164 0.999995 0.000164
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in P Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = 89.873, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB CM {1}
88.037
{2} 106.44
{3} 48.973
{4} 52.937 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.000164
1 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.000164
2 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.124654 2 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.124654
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in P Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = 27.130, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB LC {1}
100.23
{2} 94.241
{3} 51.879
{4} 50.031 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.000167 0.000164 0.000164
1 2 0.000167 0.000164 0.000164
2 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.233682 2 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.233682
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Within MS = 30.904, df = 28.000
Cell No.
LIMB CM LC {1}
89.820
{2} 86.254
{3} 110.65
{4} 102.23
{5} 50.759
{6} 47.188
{7} 53.000
{8} 52.875 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 0.242768 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142
1 1 2 0.242768 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142
1 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000198 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142
1 2 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000198 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142
2 1 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.241309 0.768296 0.814182 2 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.241309 0.007772 0.009640
2 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.768296 0.007772 1.000000 2 2 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.814182 0.009640 1.000000
group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2135, p=.03020
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 79.00305 3.038838 72.77827 85.22783 15 2 69.19041 3.038838 62.96563 75.41519 15
LIMB; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=225.04, p=.00000
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 97.23804 3.513967 90.04000 104.4361 30
2 50.95542 1.282938 48.32744 53.5834 30
LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.8094, p=.00404
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 106.9758 4.969500 96.79628 117.1554 15
1 2 51.0303 1.814348 47.31373 54.7468 15
2 1 87.5002 4.969500 77.32067 97.6798 15
2 2 50.8806 1.814348 47.16407 54.5971 15
CM; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=40.748, p=.00000
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 68.50520 2.438521 63.51011 73.50028 30 2 79.68826 2.196065 75.18983 84.18670 30
CM*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.4417, p=.23993
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 72.35977 3.448590 65.29565 79.42389 15
1 2 85.64633 3.105705 79.28458 92.00807 15
2 1 64.65062 3.448590 57.58650 71.71474 15
2 2 73.73020 3.105705 67.36845 80.09195 15
LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=20.491, p=.00010
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 76.05718 2.129812 71.69446 80.41990 30 2 72.13628 2.252457 67.52233 76.75023 30
LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.87161, p=.35849
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 80.55917 3.012010 74.38935 86.72899 15
1 2 77.44693 3.185455 70.92182 83.97204 15
2 1 71.55519 3.012010 65.38537 77.72501 15
2 2 66.82563 3.185455 60.30052 73.35074 15
LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=34.792, p=.00000
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 88.0370 4.125917 79.58546 96.4886 30
1 2 106.4391 3.401082 99.47226 113.4059 30
2 1 48.9734 1.295695 46.31927 51.6275 30
2 2 52.9375 1.511752 49.84079 56.0342 30
LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.9695, p=.17150
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB CM DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 95.8643 5.834927 83.9120 107.8166 15
1 1 2 118.0874 4.809856 108.2348 127.9399 15
1 2 1 48.8552 1.832389 45.1018 52.6087 15
1 2 2 53.2053 2.137940 48.8259 57.5846 15
2 1 1 80.2097 5.834927 68.2574 92.1620 15
2 1 2 94.7907 4.809856 84.9382 104.6433 15
2 2 1 49.0915 1.832389 45.3380 52.8450 15
2 2 2 52.6697 2.137940 48.2903 57.0490 15
LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.5031, p=.00457
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 100.2350 3.556614 92.94956 107.5203 30
1 2 94.2411 3.595765 86.87553 101.6067 30
2 1 51.8794 1.279261 49.25896 54.4999 30
2 2 50.0314 1.405229 47.15296 52.9099 30
LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.06389, p=.80230
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 109.4834 5.029811 99.18034 119.7865 15
1 1 2 104.4682 5.085180 94.05172 114.8848 15
1 2 1 51.6349 1.809148 47.92902 55.3408 15
1 2 2 50.4256 1.987294 46.35483 54.4964 15
2 1 1 90.9865 5.029811 80.68336 101.2896 15
2 1 2 84.0140 5.085180 73.59748 94.4305 15
2 2 1 52.1239 1.809148 48.41805 55.8298 15
2 2 2 49.6373 1.987294 45.56648 53.7081 15
CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part Current effect: F(1, 28)=.15897, p=.69313
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 1 1 70.28961 2.496635 65.17549 75.40374 30
CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.0517, p=.31390
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 74.19263 3.530776 66.96016 81.42509 15
1 1 2 70.52692 3.529881 63.29628 77.75755 15
1 2 1 86.92571 3.032914 80.71307 93.13836 15
1 2 2 84.36694 3.465727 77.26772 91.46616 15
2 1 1 66.38660 3.530776 59.15413 73.61906 15
2 1 2 62.91464 3.529881 55.68401 70.14528 15
2 2 1 76.72378 3.032914 70.51114 82.93642 15
2 2 2 70.73662 3.465727 63.63740 77.83584 15
LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.3630, p=.00733
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LIMB CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 89.8202 4.231221 81.1529 98.4874 30
1 1 2 86.2539 4.152371 77.7481 94.7596 30
1 2 1 110.6497 3.498713 103.4829 117.8165 30
1 2 2 102.2284 3.660786 94.7296 109.7272 30
2 1 1 50.7591 1.315877 48.0636 53.4545 30
2 1 2 47.1877 1.498140 44.1189 50.2565 30
2 2 1 52.9998 1.578705 49.7659 56.2336 30
2 2 2 52.8752 1.687570 49.4183 56.3320 30
LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.07714, p=.78325
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LIMB CM LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 1 1 1 97.5112 5.983850 85.2539 109.7686 15
1 1 1 2 94.2173 5.872340 82.1884 106.2463 15
1 1 2 1 121.4556 4.947928 111.3203 131.5910 15
1 1 2 2 114.7191 5.177133 104.1143 125.3240 15
1 2 1 1 50.8740 1.860931 47.0621 54.6859 15
1 2 1 2 46.8365 2.118689 42.4965 51.1764 15
1 2 2 1 52.3958 2.232627 47.8225 56.9691 15
1 2 2 2 54.0147 2.386585 49.1261 58.9034 15
2 1 1 1 82.1291 5.983850 69.8717 94.3865 15
2 1 1 2 78.2904 5.872340 66.2614 90.3193 15
2 1 2 1 99.8438 4.947928 89.7084 109.9792 15
2 1 2 2 89.7376 5.177133 79.1328 100.3425 15
3.3.2 Variability of Movement Amplitude- Tonic hand activation
2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA
Caption
Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group
Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral
Direction: 1= DF, 2= PF
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
SS Degr. of
Freedom
MS F p
Intercept group Error DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error
LC LC*group Error
DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error
278476.6 1 278476.6 934.0819 0.000000
22.9 1 22.9 0.0770 0.783479
8347.6 28 298.1
38.7 1 38.7 0.6085 0.441907
15.1 1 15.1 0.2369 0.630210
1782.4 28 63.7
195.1 1 195.1 3.7135 0.064176
83.5 1 83.5 1.5889 0.217891
1471.1 28 52.5
34.3 1 34.3 0.6995 0.410029
6.4 1 6.4 0.1305 0.720581
1372.4 28 49.0
Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
Degr. of Freedom
F p H-F
Epsilon
H-F Adj. df1
H-F Adj. df2
H-F Adj. p
Lowr.Bnd Epsilon
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2
L
DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error
LC LC*group Error
DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error
1 0.608476 0.441907 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.441907 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.236946 0.630210 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.630210 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 3.713530 0.064176 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.064176 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 1.588874 0.217891 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.217891 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 0.699512 0.410029 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.410029 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 0.130544 0.720581 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.720581 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.07697, p=.78348
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 48.61031 2.229083 44.04424 53.17638 15 2 47.73570 2.229083 43.16963 52.30177 15
DIRECTIO; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.60848, p=.44191
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
DIRECTIO DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 47.60487 1.400124 44.73684 50.47289 30 2 48.74115 2.017282 44.60893 52.87337 30
DIRECTIO*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.23695, p=.63021
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DIRECTIO DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 47.68764 1.980075 43.63164 51.74363 15
1 2 49.53299 2.852868 43.68915 55.37682 15
2 1 47.52210 1.980075 43.46610 51.57810 15
2 2 47.94931 2.852868 42.10548 53.79315 15
LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.7135, p=.06418
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 49.44809 1.965080 45.42281 53.47338 30 2 46.89792 1.408157 44.01344 49.78240 30
LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.5889, p=.21789
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 49.05135 2.779042 43.35874 54.74396 15
1 2 48.16927 1.991435 44.09000 52.24854 15
2 1 49.84484 2.779042 44.15223 55.53745 15
2 2 45.62657 1.991435 41.54730 49.70584 15
DIRECTIO*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.69951, p=.41003
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
DIRECTIO LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4
1 1 48.34544 1.435997 45.40393 51.28694 30
1 2 46.86430 1.490157 43.81185 49.91674 30
2 1 50.55075 2.925833 44.55745 56.54405 30
2 2 46.93155 1.612890 43.62769 50.23540 30
DIRECTIO*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13054, p=.72058
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DIRECTIO LC DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 1 1 47.36325 2.030807 43.20333 51.52317 15
1 1 2 48.01202 2.107400 43.69521 52.32884 15
1 2 1 50.73945 4.137753 42.26365 59.21526 15
1 2 2 48.32652 2.280971 43.65417 52.99888 15
2 1 1 49.32762 2.030807 45.16770 53.48754 15
2 1 2 45.71657 2.107400 41.39976 50.03338 15
2 2 1 50.36205 4.137753 41.88625 58.83786 15
2 2 2 45.53657 2.280971 40.86421 50.20893 15
3.4.1 Variability of Movement Amplitude- Phasic hand activation
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA
Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral
CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional
Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
SS Degr. of
Freedom
MS F p
Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error
CM*LC CM*LC*group Error
LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error
10397.23 1 10397.23 134.8731 0.000000 377.77 1 377.77 4.9004 0.035167
2158.49 28 77.09
1547.90 1 1547.90 54.9505 0.000000 123.65 1 123.65 4.3897 0.045323
788.73 28 28.17
300.06 1 300.06 6.2537 0.018519
48.07 1 48.07 1.0019 0.325421
1343.47 28 47.98
281.45 1 281.45 5.5825 0.025323
53.83 1 53.83 1.0677 0.310300
1411.68 28 50.42
41.05 1 41.05 1.9817 0.170215
81.84 1 81.84 3.9506 0.056714
580.05 28 20.72
38.64 1 38.64 2.2081 0.148459
29.27 1 29.27 1.6729 0.206437
489.91 28 17.50
88.94 1 88.94 2.6131 0.117195
0.00 1 0.00 0.0000 0.999252
953.02 28 34.04
7.95 1 7.95 0.6869 0.414243
19.72 1 19.72 1.7033 0.202483
324.10 28 11.57
Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Effect
Degr. of Freedom
F p H-F
Epsilon
H-F Adj. df1
H-F Adj. df2
H-F Adj. p
Lowr.Bnd Epsilon
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1
Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2
L
LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error
1 54.95053 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.38974 0.045323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.045323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 6.25374 0.018519 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.018519 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 1.00191 0.325421 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.325421 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 5.58245 0.025323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 1.06774 0.310300 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.310300 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
1 1.98173 0.170215 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.170215 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
1 3.95062 0.056714 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.056714 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000
28
group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.9004, p=.03517
Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
group 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
DV
_
1
LIMB; LS Means
Current effect: F(1, 28)=54.951, p=.00000 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LIMB 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
DV
_
1
LIMB*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3897, p=.04532
Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals
group 1 group 2
1 2
LIMB 0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
DV
_
1
CM; LS Means
Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.2537, p=.01852 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
CM 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
DV
_
1
LC; LS Mea ns
Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5825, p=.02532 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls
1 2
LC 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
DV
_
1
Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (AmplitudeSD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests
Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 13.157, df = 46.05
Cell No.
group LIMB {1}
7.1491
{2} 3.5055
{3} 11.094
{4} 4.5791 1
2 3 4
1 1 0.004286 0.088755 0.225850 1 2 0.004286 0.000173 0.907666
2 1 0.088755 0.000173 0.000165
2 2 0.225850 0.907666 0.000165
group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.9004, p=.03517
Effective hypothesis decomposition
Cell No.
group DV_1
Mean
DV_1 Std.Err.
DV_1 -95.00%
DV_1 +95.00%
N
1 2
1 5.327324 0.801504 3.685518 6.969130 15 2 7.836534 0.801504 6.194728 9.478340 15