• No results found

Age related changes in interlimb coordination

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Age related changes in interlimb coordination"

Copied!
65
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

3.1.1 Movement Frequency- Phasic hand activation

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA

Coding

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of

Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

CM*LC CM*LC*group Error

LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error

224.7223 1 224.7223 4934.847 0.000000 0.2893 1 0.2893 6.352 0.017703

1.2751 28 0.0455

0.0106 1 0.0106 10.445 0.003140

0.0040 1 0.0040 3.937 0.057123

0.0285 28 0.0010

0.3095 1 0.3095 7.582 0.010234 0.2950 1 0.2950 7.227 0.011954

1.1431 28 0.0408

0.0727 1 0.0727 7.343 0.011363

0.0386 1 0.0386 3.892 0.058465

0.2774 28 0.0099

0.0043 1 0.0043 7.162 0.012304 0.0025 1 0.0025 4.202 0.049855

0.0167 28 0.0006

0.0019 1 0.0019 5.588 0.025261

0.0010 1 0.0010 3.086 0.089885

0.0094 28 0.0003

0.0418 1 0.0418 5.330 0.028553 0.0341 1 0.0341 4.341 0.046463

0.2198 28 0.0078

0.0030 1 0.0030 5.705 0.023897 0.0023 1 0.0023 4.367 0.045853

0.0147 28 0.0005

(2)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

L

LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

CM*LC CM*LC*group Error

LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error

1 10.44549 0.003140 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.003140 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 3.93673 0.057123 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.057123 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 7.58243 0.010234 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.010234 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 7.22723 0.011954 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.011954 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 7.34256 0.011363 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.011363 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 3.89195 0.058465 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.058465 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 7.16192 0.012304 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.012304 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.20168 0.049855 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.049855 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 5.58757 0.025261 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025261 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 3.08632 0.089885 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.089885 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 5.33042 0.028553 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.028553 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.34055 0.046463 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.046463 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 5.70522 0.023897 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.023897 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.36672 0.045853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.045853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.3521, p=.01770

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

group 0.86

0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06

DV

_

1

(3)

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.445, p=.00314 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LIMB 0.88

0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06

DV

_

1

CM; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.5824, p=.01023 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

CM 0.80

0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10

DV

_

1

CM*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.2272, p=.01195

Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

group 1 group 2

1 2

CM 0.6

0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

DV

_

1

(4)

LC; LS Mea ns

Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.3426, p=.01136 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LC 0.86

0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06

DV

_

1

LIMB*CM; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.1619, p=.01230

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LIMB 0.82

0.84 0.86 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06

DV

_

1

LIMB*CM*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.2017, p=.04985

Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

group 1 group 2 L IMB: 1

CM: 1 2

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

CM: 1 2

(5)

LIMB*LC; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5876, p=.02526

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

LC 1 LC 2

1 2

LIMB 0.86

0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.06

DV

_

1

CM*LC; LS Mea ns Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.3304, p=.02855

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LC 0.75

0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10

DV

_

1

CM*LC*gr oup; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3405, p=.04646

Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

group 1 group 2 LC: 1

CM: 1 2

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

DV

_

1

LC: 2

CM: 1 2

(6)

LIMB*CM*LC; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.7052, p=.02390

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2 LIMB: 1

LC: 1 2

0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2

LIMB*CM*LC*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585

Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

group 1 group 2 LC: 1

CM: 1 2

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

DV

_

1

LC: 2

CM: 1 2

Factors: Levels LIMB: 1

LIMB*CM*LC*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585

Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

group 1 group 2 LC: 1

CM: 1 2

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

DV

_

1

LC: 2

CM: 1 2

(7)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01080, df = 55.83

Cell No.

group CM {1}

1.0039

{2} .86196

{3} 1.0032

{4} 1.0015 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.003439 0.999998 0.999920 1 2 0.003439 0.002625 0.006688

2 1 0.999998 0.002625 0.999968

2 2 0.999920 0.006688 0.999968

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00060, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB CM {1}

1.0011

{2} .92086

{3} 1.0060

{4} .94261 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.000164 0.697604 0.000164

1 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.000356

2 1 0.697604 0.000164 0.000164

2 2 0.000164 0.000356 0.000164

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01153, df = 28.734

Cell No.

group LIMB CM {1}

1.0006

{2} .84376

{3} 1.0072

{4} .88015

{5} 1.0016

{6} .99796

{7} 1.0048

{8} 1.0051 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.000142 0.963402 0.000142 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000215 0.007987 0.135893 0.006512 0.006398

1 2 1 0.963402 0.000142 0.000142 1.000000 0.999997 1.000000 1.000000

1 2 2 0.000142 0.000215 0.000142 0.072369 0.088492 0.060634 0.345456

2 1 1 1.000000 0.007987 1.000000 0.072369 0.998863 0.999580 0.999280

2 1 2 1.000000 0.135893 0.999997 0.088492 0.998863 0.954931 0.944957

2 2 1 1.000000 0.006512 1.000000 0.060634 0.999580 0.954931 1.000000

2 2 2 1.000000 0.006398 1.000000 0.345456 0.999280 0.944957 1.000000

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01147, df = 28.412

Cell No.

group LIMB LC {1}

.88723

{2} .95715

{3} .91846

{4} .96889

{5} .99434

{6} 1.0052

{7} 1.0009

{8} 1.0090 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.000142 0.000148 0.000142 0.534478 0.086300 0.108707 0.070426 1 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.243245 0.977740 0.986266 0.947081 0.881778 1 2 1 0.000148 0.000142 0.000142 0.536410 0.370616 0.802824 0.320868 1 2 2 0.000142 0.243245 0.000142 0.997709 0.980393 0.990567 0.995376

2 1 1 0.534478 0.977740 0.536410 0.997709 0.325326 0.853992 0.074493

2 1 2 0.086300 0.986266 0.370616 0.980393 0.325326 0.981964 0.992740

2 2 1 0.108707 0.947081 0.802824 0.990567 0.853992 0.981964 0.687701

2 2 2 0.070426 0.881778 0.320868 0.995376 0.074493 0.992740 0.687701

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00785, df = 28.000

Cell No.

CM LC {1}

.99936

{2} 1.0078

{3} .90112

{4} .96235 1

2

1 1 0.953633 0.000170 0.125251

1 2 0.953633 0.000165 0.042189

(8)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .01335, df = 37.374

Cell No.

group CM LC {1}

.99894

{2} 1.0089

{3} .80675

{4} .91716

{5} .99977

{6} 1.0067

{7} .99549

{8} 1.0075 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.999838 0.000142 0.024753 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999

1 1 2 0.999838 0.000142 0.008584 0.999999 1.000000 0.999982 1.000000

1 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.001139 0.001316 0.000857 0.035166 0.000814

1 2 2 0.024753 0.008584 0.001139 0.522016 0.420499 0.587371 0.723016

2 1 1 1.000000 0.999999 0.001316 0.522016 0.999986 0.999999 0.999969

2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.000857 0.420499 0.999986 0.999647 1.000000

2 2 1 1.000000 0.999982 0.035166 0.587371 0.999999 0.999647 0.999422

2 2 2 0.999999 1.000000 0.000814 0.723016 0.999969 1.000000 0.999422

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00052, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB CM LC {1}

.99766

{2} 1.0046

{3} .88392

{4} .95779

{5} 1.0011

{6} 1.0109

{7} .91832

{8} .96690 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.932520 0.000142 0.000146 0.998965 0.355805 0.000142 0.000495

1 1 2 0.932520 0.000142 0.000142 0.998641 0.957420 0.000142 0.000158

1 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000205 0.000142

1 2 2 0.000146 0.000142 0.000142 0.000143 0.000142 0.000146 0.779071

2 1 1 0.998965 0.998641 0.000142 0.000143 0.704062 0.000142 0.000213

2 1 2 0.355805 0.957420 0.000142 0.000142 0.704062 0.000142 0.000143

2 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000205 0.000146 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142

2 2 2 0.000495 0.000158 0.000142 0.779071 0.000213 0.000143 0.000142

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02303, df = 28.644

Cell No.

group LIMB CM LC {1}

.99740

{2} 1.0038

{3} .77707

{4} .91045

{5} 1.0005

{6} 1.0139

{7} .83643

{8} .92387

{9} .99791

{10 1.00 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 0.999980 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 0.818897 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000

1 1 1 2 0.999980 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 0.996510 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000

1 1 2 1 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000151 0.000146 0.028455 0.020

1 1 2 2 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.953960 0.959983 0.926

1 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.000146 0.000146 0.953879 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000

1 2 1 2 0.818897 0.996510 0.000146 0.000146 0.953879 0.000146 0.000146 1.000000 1.000

1 2 2 1 0.000146 0.000146 0.000151 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.267315 0.210 1 2 2 2 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.953960 0.000146 0.000146 0.000146 0.990470 0.977

2 1 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.028455 0.959983 1.000000 1.000000 0.267315 0.990470 0.999

2 1 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.020616 0.926525 1.000000 1.000000 0.210803 0.977576 0.999881

2 1 2 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.354348 0.980174 1.000000 1.000000 0.330664 0.996470 0.999929 0.915

2 1 2 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.020813 0.996182 1.000000 1.000000 0.212318 0.978080 0.999917 1.000

2 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.024239 0.945014 1.000000 1.000000 0.237894 0.985096 1.000000 1.000

2 2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.018393 0.911384 1.000000 1.000000 0.193150 0.970806 0.996545 1.000

2 2 2 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.025771 0.951134 1.000000 1.000000 0.749669 0.987375 1.000000 0.999

2 2 2 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.016870 0.898772 1.000000 1.000000 0.180673 0.998598 0.981249 1.000

(9)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = .02303, df = 28.644

Cell No.

group LIMB CM LC {9}

.99791

{10} 1.0054

{11} .99077

{12} 1.0051

{13} 1.0016

{14} 1.0080

{15} 1.0002

{16} 1.0099 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 1 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000

1 1 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000

1 1 2 1 0.028455 0.020616 0.354348 0.020813 0.024239 0.018393 0.025771 0.016870

1 1 2 2 0.959983 0.926525 0.980174 0.996182 0.945014 0.911384 0.951134 0.898772

1 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000

1 2 1 2 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000

1 2 2 1 0.267315 0.210803 0.330664 0.212318 0.237894 0.193150 0.749669 0.180673

1 2 2 2 0.990470 0.977576 0.996470 0.978080 0.985096 0.970806 0.987375 0.998598

2 1 1 1 0.999881 0.999929 0.999917 1.000000 0.996545 1.000000 0.981249

2 1 1 2 0.999881 0.915947 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 1.000000

2 1 2 1 0.999929 0.915947 0.924234 0.992632 0.774960 0.998230 0.631263

2 1 2 2 0.999917 1.000000 0.924234 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 1.000000

2 2 1 1 1.000000 1.000000 0.992632 1.000000 0.999984 1.000000 0.999568

2 2 1 2 0.996545 1.000000 0.774960 1.000000 0.999984 0.999804 1.000000

2 2 2 1 1.000000 0.999999 0.998230 0.999999 1.000000 0.999804 0.997547

2 2 2 2 0.981249 1.000000 0.631263 1.000000 0.999568 1.000000 0.997547

group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.3521, p=.01770

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.932931 0.019480 0.893028 0.972835 15 2 1.002365 0.019480 0.962461 1.042268 15

LIMB; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.445, p=.00314

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.960992 0.013686 0.932958 0.989026 30 2 0.974304 0.014166 0.945287 1.003321 30

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.9367, p=.05712

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.922189 0.019355 0.882543 0.961836 15

1 2 0.943673 0.020033 0.902637 0.984709 15

2 1 0.999795 0.019355 0.960149 1.039441 15

2 2 1.004935 0.020033 0.963899 1.045971 15

CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.5824, p=.01023

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 1 1.003561 0.005933 0.991408 1.015715 30

(10)

CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.2272, p=.01195

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.003907 0.008391 0.986719 1.021094 15

1 2 0.861956 0.036999 0.786166 0.937746 15

2 1 1.003216 0.008391 0.986028 1.020404 15

2 2 1.001514 0.036999 0.925724 1.077303 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.3426, p=.01136

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.950238 0.016791 0.915844 0.984633 30 2 0.985058 0.013420 0.957567 1.012549 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.8919, p=.05847

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.902846 0.023746 0.854205 0.951487 15

1 2 0.963016 0.018979 0.924139 1.001894 15

2 1 0.997630 0.023746 0.948989 1.046271 15

2 2 1.007099 0.018979 0.968222 1.045977 15

LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=7.1619, p=.01230

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.001127 0.005795 0.989256 1.012997 30

1 2 0.920858 0.026268 0.867051 0.974665 30

2 1 1.005996 0.006198 0.993301 1.018691 30

2 2 0.942612 0.026539 0.888250 0.996974 30

LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.2017, p=.04985

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.000619 0.008195 0.983832 1.017406 15

1 1 2 0.843760 0.037148 0.767666 0.919854 15

1 2 1 1.007194 0.008765 0.989241 1.025148 15

1 2 2 0.880152 0.037531 0.803273 0.957031 15

2 1 1 1.001634 0.008195 0.984847 1.018422 15

2 1 2 0.997956 0.037148 0.921862 1.074050 15

2 2 1 1.004798 0.008765 0.986844 1.022752 15

2 2 2 1.005071 0.037531 0.928192 1.081951 15

(11)

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5876, p=.02526

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.940788 0.016875 0.906221 0.975356 30

1 2 0.981196 0.013108 0.954347 1.008046 30

2 1 0.959688 0.017241 0.924372 0.995004 30

2 2 0.988920 0.013886 0.960476 1.017363 30

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.0863, p=.08989

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.887234 0.023865 0.838348 0.936120 15

1 1 2 0.957145 0.018537 0.919174 0.995116 15

1 2 1 0.918459 0.024382 0.868515 0.968403 15

1 2 2 0.968887 0.019637 0.928662 1.009113 15

2 1 1 0.994343 0.023865 0.945457 1.043229 15

2 1 2 1.005247 0.018537 0.967276 1.043218 15

2 2 1 1.000917 0.024382 0.950973 1.050861 15

2 2 2 1.008952 0.019637 0.968726 1.049177 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Par Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.3304, p=.02855

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.999355 0.006883 0.985257 1.013454 30

1 2 1.007767 0.005990 0.995497 1.020038 30

2 1 0.901121 0.032470 0.834609 0.967633 30

2 2 0.962348 0.024449 0.912267 1.012430 30

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3405, p=.04646

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.998940 0.009734 0.979002 1.018879 15

1 1 2 1.008873 0.008471 0.991520 1.026226 15

1 2 1 0.806752 0.045920 0.712690 0.900814 15

1 2 2 0.917160 0.034576 0.846334 0.987985 15

2 1 1 0.999770 0.009734 0.979832 1.019709 15

2 1 2 1.006662 0.008471 0.989309 1.024014 15

2 2 1 0.995490 0.045920 0.901428 1.089552 15

2 2 2 1.007537 0.034576 0.936711 1.078363 15

(12)

LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.7052, p=.02390

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.997655 0.007016 0.983283 1.012027 30

1 1 2 1.004598 0.005557 0.993215 1.015982 30

1 2 1 0.883922 0.032936 0.816456 0.951387 30

1 2 2 0.957794 0.024156 0.908313 1.007275 30

2 1 1 1.001056 0.006852 0.987020 1.015091 30

2 1 2 1.010937 0.006761 0.997087 1.024786 30

2 2 1 0.918321 0.033065 0.850590 0.986052 30

2 2 2 0.966903 0.024875 0.915949 1.017856 30

LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3667, p=.04585

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 1 0.997398 0.009922 0.977073 1.017722 15

1 1 1 2 1.003841 0.007859 0.987742 1.019939 15

1 1 2 1 0.777070 0.046578 0.681659 0.872481 15

1 1 2 2 0.910450 0.034162 0.840473 0.980427 15

1 2 1 1 1.000483 0.009690 0.980634 1.020332 15

1 2 1 2 1.013906 0.009562 0.994319 1.033492 15

1 2 2 1 0.836435 0.046761 0.740649 0.932221 15

1 2 2 2 0.923869 0.035178 0.851811 0.995928 15

2 1 1 1 0.997913 0.009922 0.977588 1.018237 15

2 1 1 2 1.005356 0.007859 0.989257 1.021455 15

2 1 2 1 0.990773 0.046578 0.895362 1.086184 15

2 1 2 2 1.005138 0.034162 0.935161 1.075115 15

3.1.2 Movement Frequency- Tonic hand activation

2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Direction: 1= DF, 2= PF

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of

Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error

126.3592 1 126.3592 5044.050 0.000000

0.0185 1 0.0185 0.737 0.397872

0.7014 28 0.0251

0.0231 1 0.0231 1.725 0.199688

0.0103 1 0.0103 0.770 0.387757

0.3742 28 0.0134

0.0000 1 0.0000 0.021 0.885827

0.0017 1 0.0017 2.643 0.115207

0.0178 28 0.0006

(13)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

Lowr.Bn Adj. p CM

CM*group Error LC LC*group Error CM*LC CM*LC*group Error

1 1.725192 0.199688 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.199688 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.199

1 0.769761 0.387757 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.387757 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.387

28

1 0.020996 0.885827 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.885827 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.885

1 2.643058 0.115207 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.115207 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.115

28

1 0.270612 0.607011 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.607011 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.607

1 0.985632 0.329315 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.329315 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.329

28

group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.73713, p=.39787

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.038560 0.020433 0.996704 1.080415 15 2 1.013750 0.020433 0.971894 1.055605 15

CM; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.7252, p=.19969

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.040016 0.024601 0.989624 1.090409 30 2 1.012293 0.005922 1.000163 1.024423 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.76976, p=.38776

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.061681 0.034791 0.990415 1.132946 15

1 2 1.015439 0.008375 0.998284 1.032594 15

2 1 1.018352 0.034791 0.947086 1.089618 15

2 2 1.009147 0.008375 0.991993 1.026302 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.02100, p=.88583

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 1.025821 0.015312 0.994455 1.057187 30 2 1.026489 0.013916 0.997982 1.054995 30

(14)

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.6431, p=.11521

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.041971 0.021655 0.997613 1.086330 15

1 2 1.035148 0.019681 0.994834 1.075462 15

2 1 1.009671 0.021655 0.965312 1.054029 15

2 2 1.017829 0.019681 0.977515 1.058143 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Par Current effect: F(1, 28)=.27061, p=.60701

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 1.041189 0.027771 0.984302 1.098075 30

1 2 1.038844 0.022008 0.993762 1.083926 30

2 1 1.010453 0.005366 0.999462 1.021445 30

2 2 1.014133 0.007134 0.999519 1.028747 30

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Frequency_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.98563, p=.32931

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 1.069472 0.039274 0.989022 1.149922 15

1 1 2 1.053889 0.031124 0.990133 1.117644 15

1 2 1 1.014470 0.007589 0.998926 1.030015 15

1 2 2 1.016408 0.010090 0.995740 1.037075 15

2 1 1 1.012905 0.039274 0.932455 1.093355 15

2 1 2 1.023799 0.031124 0.960044 1.087555 15

2 2 1 1.006436 0.007589 0.990892 1.021981 15

2 2 2 1.011858 0.010090 0.991191 1.032526 15

3.2.1 Variability of Movement Frequency- Phasic hand activation

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

(15)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of

Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

CM*LC CM*LC*group Error

LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error

2.374518 1 2.374518 521.5053 0.000000

0.002810 1 0.002810 0.6171 0.438709

0.127490 28 0.004553

0.016394 1 0.016394 10.2126 0.003442

0.005855 1 0.005855 3.6476 0.066443

0.044947 28 0.001605

0.004268 1 0.004268 2.0188 0.166405

0.001332 1 0.001332 0.6302 0.433956

0.059194 28 0.002114

0.009325 1 0.009325 4.4347 0.044309

0.000760 1 0.000760 0.3614 0.552578

0.058873 28 0.002103

0.005568 1 0.005568 5.2894 0.029120

0.000325 1 0.000325 0.3086 0.582978

0.029475 28 0.001053

0.014155 1 0.014155 19.0892 0.000155

0.001716 1 0.001716 2.3136 0.139457

0.020763 28 0.000742

0.017690 1 0.017690 9.7870 0.004078

0.002756 1 0.002756 1.5247 0.227168

0.050610 28 0.001807

0.010650 1 0.010650 8.8939 0.005869

0.000841 1 0.000841 0.7024 0.409070

0.033529 28 0.001197

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

L

LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

1 10.21258 0.003442 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.003442 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 3.64761 0.066443 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.066443 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 2.01879 0.166405 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.166405 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.63021 0.433956 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.433956 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 4.43471 0.044309 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.044309 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.36138 0.552578 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.552578 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 5.28943 0.029120 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.029120 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.30856 0.582978 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.582978 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

(16)

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.213, p=.00344 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LIMB 0.07

0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14

DV

_

1

LC; LS Mea ns

Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.4347, p=.04431 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LC 0.06

0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14

DV

_

1

LIMB*CM; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2894, p=.02912

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LIMB 0.07

0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16

DV

_

1

(17)

LIMB*LC; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 28)=19.089, p=.00016

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

LC 1 LC 2

1 2

LIMB 0.07

0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16

DV

_

1

CM*LC; LS Mea ns Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.7870, p=.00408

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LC 0.06

0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16

DV

_

1

LIMB*CM*LC; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.8939, p=.00587

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2 LIMB: 1

LC: 1 2

0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2

(18)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00105, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB CM {1}

.09180

{2} .09060

{3} .09870

{4} .11677 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.997061 0.653858 0.001393

1 2 0.997061 0.529985 0.000871

2 1 0.653858 0.529985 0.024234

2 2 0.001393 0.000871 0.024234

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00074, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB LC {1}

.08976

{2} .09265

{3} .12165

{4} .09382 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.936755 0.000166 0.845860

1 2 0.936755 0.000175 0.995374

2 1 0.000166 0.000175 0.000187

2 2 0.845860 0.995374 0.000187

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00181, df = 28.000

Cell No.

CM LC {1}

.09290

{2} .09760

{3} .11850

{4} .08887 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.929372 0.013398 0.953770

1 2 0.929372 0.054419 0.677228

2 1 0.013398 0.054419 0.003705

2 2 0.953770 0.677228 0.003705

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = .00120, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB CM LC {1}

.08843

{2} .09517

{3} .09108

{4} .09013

{5} .09736

{6} .10003

{7} .14593

{8} .08761 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.994215 0.999988 0.999999 0.970708 0.891917 0.000157 1.000000

1 1 2 0.994215 0.999769 0.999090 0.999997 0.999287 0.000235 0.988493

1 2 1 0.999988 0.999769 1.000000 0.996246 0.970357 0.000170 0.999923

1 2 2 0.999999 0.999090 1.000000 0.991132 0.949504 0.000164 0.999991

2 1 1 0.970708 0.999997 0.996246 0.991132 0.999987 0.000326 0.953249

2 1 2 0.891917 0.999287 0.970357 0.949504 0.999987 0.000566 0.853866

2 2 1 0.000157 0.000235 0.000170 0.000164 0.000326 0.000566 0.000154

2 2 2 1.000000 0.988493 0.999923 0.999991 0.953249 0.853866 0.000154

group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=.61714, p=.43871

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.102889 0.006160 0.090272 0.115507 15 2 0.096046 0.006160 0.083428 0.108664 15

(19)

LIMB; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=10.213, p=.00344

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.091203 0.002981 0.085097 0.097308 30 2 0.107733 0.006514 0.094389 0.121077 30

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.6476, p=.06644

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.089685 0.004215 0.081051 0.098320 15

1 2 0.116094 0.009213 0.097222 0.134965 15

2 1 0.092721 0.004215 0.084086 0.101355 15

2 2 0.099371 0.009213 0.080500 0.118243 15

CM; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.0188, p=.16640

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.095251 0.003415 0.088256 0.102246 30 2 0.103685 0.006626 0.090112 0.117257 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.63021, p=.43396

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.096316 0.004829 0.086424 0.106208 15

1 2 0.109463 0.009370 0.090269 0.128656 15

2 1 0.094185 0.004829 0.084293 0.104077 15

2 2 0.097907 0.009370 0.078713 0.117101 15

LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.4347, p=.04431

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.105701 0.005910 0.093594 0.117807 30 2 0.093235 0.004531 0.083952 0.102517 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.36138, p=.55258

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.110902 0.008358 0.093781 0.128023 15

1 2 0.094877 0.006408 0.081750 0.108004 15

2 1 0.100500 0.008358 0.083379 0.117621 15

2 2 0.091592 0.006408 0.078465 0.104719 15

(20)

LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2894, p=.02912

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.091803 0.003102 0.085448 0.098157 30

1 2 0.090603 0.004067 0.082272 0.098934 30

2 1 0.098699 0.004543 0.089393 0.108005 30

2 2 0.116766 0.010422 0.095418 0.138114 30

LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.30856, p=.58298

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.089092 0.004387 0.080106 0.098079 15

1 1 2 0.090278 0.005752 0.078496 0.102061 15

1 2 1 0.103540 0.006425 0.090380 0.116701 15

1 2 2 0.128647 0.014739 0.098456 0.158838 15

2 1 1 0.094513 0.004387 0.085526 0.103500 15

2 1 2 0.090928 0.005752 0.079146 0.102710 15

2 2 1 0.093857 0.006425 0.080696 0.107018 15

2 2 2 0.104886 0.014739 0.074695 0.135076 15

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=19.089, p=.00016

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.089756 0.004022 0.081517 0.097995 30

1 2 0.092650 0.003753 0.084961 0.100338 30

2 1 0.121645 0.009329 0.102536 0.140755 30

2 2 0.093820 0.005722 0.082098 0.105541 30

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=2.3136, p=.13946

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.087344 0.005688 0.075693 0.098996 15

1 1 2 0.092026 0.005308 0.081154 0.102899 15

1 2 1 0.134460 0.013193 0.107434 0.161485 15

1 2 2 0.097728 0.008093 0.081150 0.114305 15

2 1 1 0.092168 0.005688 0.080516 0.103820 15

2 1 2 0.093273 0.005308 0.082400 0.104146 15

2 2 1 0.108831 0.013193 0.081806 0.135857 15

2 2 2 0.089911 0.008093 0.073334 0.106489 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.7870, p=.00408

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 1 1 0.092899 0.003753 0.085211 0.100586 30

(21)

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.5247, p=.22717

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.092355 0.005307 0.081484 0.103226 15

1 1 2 0.100278 0.006139 0.087703 0.112853 15

1 2 1 0.129449 0.014517 0.099711 0.159187 15

1 2 2 0.089476 0.008716 0.071622 0.107330 15

2 1 1 0.093442 0.005307 0.082571 0.104314 15

2 1 2 0.094928 0.006139 0.082353 0.107503 15

2 2 1 0.107557 0.014517 0.077820 0.137295 15

2 2 2 0.088256 0.008716 0.070403 0.106110 15

LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.8939, p=.00587

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.088432 0.003305 0.081662 0.095202 30

1 1 2 0.095173 0.004279 0.086409 0.103937 30

1 2 1 0.091080 0.006608 0.077545 0.104616 30

1 2 2 0.090126 0.005487 0.078887 0.101365 30

2 1 1 0.097365 0.005008 0.087106 0.107624 30

2 1 2 0.100033 0.005650 0.088460 0.111606 30

2 2 1 0.145926 0.017051 0.111000 0.180852 30

2 2 2 0.087606 0.007422 0.072402 0.102810 30

LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.70242, p=.40907

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 1 0.083311 0.004674 0.073737 0.092885 15

1 1 1 2 0.094874 0.006051 0.082479 0.107268 15

1 1 2 1 0.091378 0.009345 0.072236 0.110520 15

1 1 2 2 0.089179 0.007759 0.073285 0.105073 15

1 2 1 1 0.101399 0.007083 0.086890 0.115908 15

1 2 1 2 0.105682 0.007990 0.089316 0.122049 15

1 2 2 1 0.167520 0.024113 0.118127 0.216914 15

1 2 2 2 0.089773 0.010497 0.068272 0.111275 15

2 1 1 1 0.093553 0.004674 0.083979 0.103127 15

2 1 1 2 0.095473 0.006051 0.083078 0.107867 15

2 1 2 1 0.090783 0.009345 0.071641 0.109925 15

2 1 2 2 0.091073 0.007759 0.075179 0.106967 15

3.2.2 Variability of Movement Frequency- Tonic hand activation

2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Direction: 1= DF, 2= PF

(22)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of

Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error

LC LC*group Error

DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error

1.320912 1 1.320912 844.8767 0.000000

0.000733 1 0.000733 0.4687 0.499231

0.043776 28 0.001563

0.007501 1 0.007501 5.5468 0.025755

0.000183 1 0.000183 0.1352 0.715853

0.037864 28 0.001352

0.000052 1 0.000052 0.0362 0.850454

0.000188 1 0.000188 0.1302 0.720902

0.040436 28 0.001444

0.000322 1 0.000322 0.3088 0.582843

0.000444 1 0.000444 0.4258 0.519384

0.029225 28 0.001044

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

L

DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error

LC LC*group Error

DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error

1 5.546761 0.025755 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025755 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.135212 0.715853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.715853 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 0.036211 0.850454 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.850454 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.130230 0.720902 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.720902 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 0.308780 0.582843 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.582843 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.425789 0.519384 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.519384 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

DIRECTIO; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5468, p=.02575

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

DIRECTIO 0.08

0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14

DV

_

1

(23)

group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=.46866, p=.49923

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.102446 0.005105 0.091990 0.112902 15 2 0.107388 0.005105 0.096932 0.117845 15

DIRECTIO; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5468, p=.02575

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

DIRECTIO DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.112823 0.005643 0.101265 0.124382 30 2 0.097011 0.004093 0.088626 0.105396 30

DIRECTIO*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13521, p=.71585

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DIRECTIO DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.111587 0.007980 0.095240 0.127933 15

1 2 0.093306 0.005789 0.081448 0.105164 15

2 1 0.114060 0.007980 0.097714 0.130406 15

2 2 0.100716 0.005789 0.088858 0.112574 15

LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.03621, p=.85045

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 0.104257 0.004723 0.094583 0.113931 30 2 0.105577 0.005275 0.094772 0.116382 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13023, p=.72090

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.103038 0.006679 0.089357 0.116719 15

1 2 0.101854 0.007460 0.086574 0.117135 15

2 1 0.105476 0.006679 0.091795 0.119157 15

2 2 0.109300 0.007460 0.094020 0.124581 15

DIRECTIO*LC; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.30878, p=.58284

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

DIRECTIO LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 0.113802 0.007608 0.098218 0.129385 30

1 2 0.111844 0.008207 0.095033 0.128656 30

2 1 0.094712 0.004706 0.085073 0.104351 30

2 2 0.099310 0.005722 0.087589 0.111031 30

(24)

DIRECTIO*LC*group; Unweighted Means (FrequencySD_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.42579, p=.51938

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DIRECTIO LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.115742 0.010759 0.093703 0.137780 15

1 1 2 0.107431 0.011607 0.083656 0.131207 15

1 2 1 0.090334 0.006655 0.076702 0.103966 15

1 2 2 0.096277 0.008092 0.079701 0.112854 15

2 1 1 0.111862 0.010759 0.089824 0.133901 15

2 1 2 0.116257 0.011607 0.092482 0.140033 15

2 2 1 0.099090 0.006655 0.085458 0.112722 15

2 2 2 0.102343 0.008092 0.085766 0.118919 15

3.3.1 Movement Amplitude- Phasic hand activation

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Limb: 1= upper limb, 2 = lower limb

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Amplitude_No TMS in Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of

Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

CM*LC CM*LC*group Error

LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error

1317678 1 1317678 1189.085 0.000000 5777 1 5777 5.213 0.030204

31028 28 1108

128525 1 128525 225.039 0.000000 5602 1 5602 9.809 0.004042

15991 28 571

7504 1 7504 40.748 0.000001

265 1 265 1.442 0.239927

5156 28 184

922 1 922 20.491 0.000101

39 1 39 0.872 0.358491

1260 28 45

3127 1 3127 34.792 0.000002

177 1 177 1.969 0.171498

2516 28 90

258 1 258 9.503 0.004573

2 1 2 0.064 0.802300

760 28 27

7 1 7 0.159 0.693129

49 1 49 1.052 0.313903

1310 28 47

258 1 258 8.363 0.007327

2 1 2 0.077 0.783252

865 28 31

(25)

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

L

LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

1 225.0389 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 9.8094 0.004042 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.004042 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 40.7484 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000001 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 1.4417 0.239927 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.239927 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 20.4911 0.000101 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000101 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.8716 0.358491 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.358491 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 34.7916 0.000002 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000002 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 1.9695 0.171498 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.171498 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2135, p=.03020

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

group 60

65 70 75 80 85 90

DV

_

1

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 28)=225.04, p=.00000 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LIMB 30

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

DV

_

1

(26)

LIMB*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.8094, p=.00404

Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

group 1 group 2

1 2

LIMB 30

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

DV

_

1

CM; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 28)=40.748, p=.00000 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

CM 55

60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

DV

_

1

LC; LS Mea ns

Current effect: F(1, 28)=20.491, p=.00010 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LC 60

65 70 75 80 85 90

DV

_

1

(27)

LIMB*CM; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=34.792, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2

1 2

LIMB 30

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

DV

_

1

LIMB*LC; LS Mean s Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.5031, p=.00457

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

LC 1 LC 2

1 2

LIMB 30

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

DV

_

1

LIMB*CM*LC; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.3630, p=.00733

Effective hypothesis d ecompositio n Vertical ba rs denote 0.95 confiden ce in ter vals

CM 1 CM 2 LIMB: 1

LC: 1 2

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

DV

_

1

LIMB: 2

LC: 1 2

(28)

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in P Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 209.91, df = 50.80

Cell No.

group LIMB {1}

106.98

{2} 51.030

{3} 87.500

{4} 50.881 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.000164 0.016816 0.000164

1 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.999995 2 1 0.016816 0.000164 0.000164

2 2 0.000164 0.999995 0.000164

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in P Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = 89.873, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB CM {1}

88.037

{2} 106.44

{3} 48.973

{4} 52.937 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.000164

1 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.000164

2 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.124654 2 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.124654

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in P Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = 27.130, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB LC {1}

100.23

{2} 94.241

{3} 51.879

{4} 50.031 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.000167 0.000164 0.000164

1 2 0.000167 0.000164 0.000164

2 1 0.000164 0.000164 0.233682 2 2 0.000164 0.000164 0.233682

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Within MS = 30.904, df = 28.000

Cell No.

LIMB CM LC {1}

89.820

{2} 86.254

{3} 110.65

{4} 102.23

{5} 50.759

{6} 47.188

{7} 53.000

{8} 52.875 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 0.242768 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142

1 1 2 0.242768 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142

1 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000198 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142

1 2 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000198 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142

2 1 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.241309 0.768296 0.814182 2 1 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.241309 0.007772 0.009640

2 2 1 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.768296 0.007772 1.000000 2 2 2 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.814182 0.009640 1.000000

group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.2135, p=.03020

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 79.00305 3.038838 72.77827 85.22783 15 2 69.19041 3.038838 62.96563 75.41519 15

(29)

LIMB; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=225.04, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 97.23804 3.513967 90.04000 104.4361 30

2 50.95542 1.282938 48.32744 53.5834 30

LIMB*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.8094, p=.00404

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 106.9758 4.969500 96.79628 117.1554 15

1 2 51.0303 1.814348 47.31373 54.7468 15

2 1 87.5002 4.969500 77.32067 97.6798 15

2 2 50.8806 1.814348 47.16407 54.5971 15

CM; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=40.748, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 68.50520 2.438521 63.51011 73.50028 30 2 79.68826 2.196065 75.18983 84.18670 30

CM*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.4417, p=.23993

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 72.35977 3.448590 65.29565 79.42389 15

1 2 85.64633 3.105705 79.28458 92.00807 15

2 1 64.65062 3.448590 57.58650 71.71474 15

2 2 73.73020 3.105705 67.36845 80.09195 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=20.491, p=.00010

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 76.05718 2.129812 71.69446 80.41990 30 2 72.13628 2.252457 67.52233 76.75023 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.87161, p=.35849

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 80.55917 3.012010 74.38935 86.72899 15

1 2 77.44693 3.185455 70.92182 83.97204 15

2 1 71.55519 3.012010 65.38537 77.72501 15

2 2 66.82563 3.185455 60.30052 73.35074 15

(30)

LIMB*CM; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=34.792, p=.00000

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 88.0370 4.125917 79.58546 96.4886 30

1 2 106.4391 3.401082 99.47226 113.4059 30

2 1 48.9734 1.295695 46.31927 51.6275 30

2 2 52.9375 1.511752 49.84079 56.0342 30

LIMB*CM*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.9695, p=.17150

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB CM DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 95.8643 5.834927 83.9120 107.8166 15

1 1 2 118.0874 4.809856 108.2348 127.9399 15

1 2 1 48.8552 1.832389 45.1018 52.6087 15

1 2 2 53.2053 2.137940 48.8259 57.5846 15

2 1 1 80.2097 5.834927 68.2574 92.1620 15

2 1 2 94.7907 4.809856 84.9382 104.6433 15

2 2 1 49.0915 1.832389 45.3380 52.8450 15

2 2 2 52.6697 2.137940 48.2903 57.0490 15

LIMB*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=9.5031, p=.00457

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 100.2350 3.556614 92.94956 107.5203 30

1 2 94.2411 3.595765 86.87553 101.6067 30

2 1 51.8794 1.279261 49.25896 54.4999 30

2 2 50.0314 1.405229 47.15296 52.9099 30

LIMB*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.06389, p=.80230

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 109.4834 5.029811 99.18034 119.7865 15

1 1 2 104.4682 5.085180 94.05172 114.8848 15

1 2 1 51.6349 1.809148 47.92902 55.3408 15

1 2 2 50.4256 1.987294 46.35483 54.4964 15

2 1 1 90.9865 5.029811 80.68336 101.2896 15

2 1 2 84.0140 5.085180 73.59748 94.4305 15

2 2 1 52.1239 1.809148 48.41805 55.8298 15

2 2 2 49.6373 1.987294 45.56648 53.7081 15

CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part Current effect: F(1, 28)=.15897, p=.69313

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 1 1 70.28961 2.496635 65.17549 75.40374 30

(31)

CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.0517, p=.31390

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 74.19263 3.530776 66.96016 81.42509 15

1 1 2 70.52692 3.529881 63.29628 77.75755 15

1 2 1 86.92571 3.032914 80.71307 93.13836 15

1 2 2 84.36694 3.465727 77.26772 91.46616 15

2 1 1 66.38660 3.530776 59.15413 73.61906 15

2 1 2 62.91464 3.529881 55.68401 70.14528 15

2 2 1 76.72378 3.032914 70.51114 82.93642 15

2 2 2 70.73662 3.465727 63.63740 77.83584 15

LIMB*CM*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=8.3630, p=.00733

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LIMB CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 89.8202 4.231221 81.1529 98.4874 30

1 1 2 86.2539 4.152371 77.7481 94.7596 30

1 2 1 110.6497 3.498713 103.4829 117.8165 30

1 2 2 102.2284 3.660786 94.7296 109.7272 30

2 1 1 50.7591 1.315877 48.0636 53.4545 30

2 1 2 47.1877 1.498140 44.1189 50.2565 30

2 2 1 52.9998 1.578705 49.7659 56.2336 30

2 2 2 52.8752 1.687570 49.4183 56.3320 30

LIMB*CM*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.07714, p=.78325

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LIMB CM LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 1 1 1 97.5112 5.983850 85.2539 109.7686 15

1 1 1 2 94.2173 5.872340 82.1884 106.2463 15

1 1 2 1 121.4556 4.947928 111.3203 131.5910 15

1 1 2 2 114.7191 5.177133 104.1143 125.3240 15

1 2 1 1 50.8740 1.860931 47.0621 54.6859 15

1 2 1 2 46.8365 2.118689 42.4965 51.1764 15

1 2 2 1 52.3958 2.232627 47.8225 56.9691 15

1 2 2 2 54.0147 2.386585 49.1261 58.9034 15

2 1 1 1 82.1291 5.983850 69.8717 94.3865 15

2 1 1 2 78.2904 5.872340 66.2614 90.3193 15

2 1 2 1 99.8438 4.947928 89.7084 109.9792 15

2 1 2 2 89.7376 5.177133 79.1328 100.3425 15

3.3.2 Variability of Movement Amplitude- Tonic hand activation

2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LC x DIRECTION] ANOVA

Caption

Group: 1= older group, 2= younger group

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

Direction: 1= DF, 2= PF

(32)

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of

Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error

LC LC*group Error

DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error

278476.6 1 278476.6 934.0819 0.000000

22.9 1 22.9 0.0770 0.783479

8347.6 28 298.1

38.7 1 38.7 0.6085 0.441907

15.1 1 15.1 0.2369 0.630210

1782.4 28 63.7

195.1 1 195.1 3.7135 0.064176

83.5 1 83.5 1.5889 0.217891

1471.1 28 52.5

34.3 1 34.3 0.6995 0.410029

6.4 1 6.4 0.1305 0.720581

1372.4 28 49.0

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

L

DIRECTIO DIRECTIO*group Error

LC LC*group Error

DIRECTIO*LC DIRECTIO*LC*group Error

1 0.608476 0.441907 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.441907 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.236946 0.630210 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.630210 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 3.713530 0.064176 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.064176 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 1.588874 0.217891 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.217891 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 0.699512 0.410029 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.410029 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 0.130544 0.720581 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.720581 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3 Current effect: F(1, 28)=.07697, p=.78348

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 48.61031 2.229083 44.04424 53.17638 15 2 47.73570 2.229083 43.16963 52.30177 15

DIRECTIO; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.60848, p=.44191

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

DIRECTIO DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 47.60487 1.400124 44.73684 50.47289 30 2 48.74115 2.017282 44.60893 52.87337 30

(33)

DIRECTIO*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.23695, p=.63021

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DIRECTIO DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 47.68764 1.980075 43.63164 51.74363 15

1 2 49.53299 2.852868 43.68915 55.37682 15

2 1 47.52210 1.980075 43.46610 51.57810 15

2 2 47.94931 2.852868 42.10548 53.79315 15

LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=3.7135, p=.06418

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 49.44809 1.965080 45.42281 53.47338 30 2 46.89792 1.408157 44.01344 49.78240 30

LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=1.5889, p=.21789

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 49.05135 2.779042 43.35874 54.74396 15

1 2 48.16927 1.991435 44.09000 52.24854 15

2 1 49.84484 2.779042 44.15223 55.53745 15

2 2 45.62657 1.991435 41.54730 49.70584 15

DIRECTIO*LC; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.69951, p=.41003

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

DIRECTIO LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4

1 1 48.34544 1.435997 45.40393 51.28694 30

1 2 46.86430 1.490157 43.81185 49.91674 30

2 1 50.55075 2.925833 44.55745 56.54405 30

2 2 46.93155 1.612890 43.62769 50.23540 30

DIRECTIO*LC*group; Unweighted Means (Amplitude_No TMS in Part3) Current effect: F(1, 28)=.13054, p=.72058

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DIRECTIO LC DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 1 1 47.36325 2.030807 43.20333 51.52317 15

1 1 2 48.01202 2.107400 43.69521 52.32884 15

1 2 1 50.73945 4.137753 42.26365 59.21526 15

1 2 2 48.32652 2.280971 43.65417 52.99888 15

2 1 1 49.32762 2.030807 45.16770 53.48754 15

2 1 2 45.71657 2.107400 41.39976 50.03338 15

2 2 1 50.36205 4.137753 41.88625 58.83786 15

2 2 2 45.53657 2.280971 40.86421 50.20893 15

3.4.1 Variability of Movement Amplitude- Phasic hand activation

2 x 2 x 2 x 2 [GROUP x LIMB x LC x CM] ANOVA

(34)

Limb combination (LC): 1= ipsilateral, 2= contralateral

CM: 1= isodirectional, 2= non-isodirectional

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

SS Degr. of

Freedom

MS F p

Intercept group Error LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

LIMB*LC LIMB*LC*group Error

CM*LC CM*LC*group Error

LIMB*CM*LC LIMB*CM*LC*group Error

10397.23 1 10397.23 134.8731 0.000000 377.77 1 377.77 4.9004 0.035167

2158.49 28 77.09

1547.90 1 1547.90 54.9505 0.000000 123.65 1 123.65 4.3897 0.045323

788.73 28 28.17

300.06 1 300.06 6.2537 0.018519

48.07 1 48.07 1.0019 0.325421

1343.47 28 47.98

281.45 1 281.45 5.5825 0.025323

53.83 1 53.83 1.0677 0.310300

1411.68 28 50.42

41.05 1 41.05 1.9817 0.170215

81.84 1 81.84 3.9506 0.056714

580.05 28 20.72

38.64 1 38.64 2.2081 0.148459

29.27 1 29.27 1.6729 0.206437

489.91 28 17.50

88.94 1 88.94 2.6131 0.117195

0.00 1 0.00 0.0000 0.999252

953.02 28 34.04

7.95 1 7.95 0.6869 0.414243

19.72 1 19.72 1.7033 0.202483

324.10 28 11.57

Adjusted Univariate Tests for Repeated Measure: DV_1 (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Part3) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Effect

Degr. of Freedom

F p H-F

Epsilon

H-F Adj. df1

H-F Adj. df2

H-F Adj. p

Lowr.Bnd Epsilon

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df1

Lowr.Bnd Adj. df2

L

LIMB LIMB*group Error CM CM*group Error LC LC*group Error LIMB*CM LIMB*CM*group Error

1 54.95053 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.000000 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 1 4.38974 0.045323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.045323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 6.25374 0.018519 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.018519 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 1.00191 0.325421 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.325421 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 5.58245 0.025323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.025323 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 1.06774 0.310300 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.310300 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

1 1.98173 0.170215 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.170215 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

1 3.95062 0.056714 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000 0.056714 1.000000 1.000000 28.00000

28

(35)

group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.9004, p=.03517

Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

group 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

DV

_

1

LIMB; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 28)=54.951, p=.00000 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LIMB 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

DV

_

1

LIMB*group; LS Means Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.3897, p=.04532

Effective hypoth esis de co mposition Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence inter vals

group 1 group 2

1 2

LIMB 0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

DV

_

1

(36)

CM; LS Means

Current effect: F(1, 28)=6.2537, p=.01852 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

CM 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

DV

_

1

LC; LS Mea ns

Current effect: F(1, 28)=5.5825, p=.02532 Effective hypothesis decomposition Vertical bars de note 0.95 confidence inter va ls

1 2

LC 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

DV

_

1

Tukey HSD test; variable DV_1 (AmplitudeSD_No TMS Approximate Probabilities for Post Hoc Tests

Error: Between; Within; Pooled MS = 13.157, df = 46.05

Cell No.

group LIMB {1}

7.1491

{2} 3.5055

{3} 11.094

{4} 4.5791 1

2 3 4

1 1 0.004286 0.088755 0.225850 1 2 0.004286 0.000173 0.907666

2 1 0.088755 0.000173 0.000165

2 2 0.225850 0.907666 0.000165

group; Unweighted Means (AmplitudeSD_No TMS in Pa Current effect: F(1, 28)=4.9004, p=.03517

Effective hypothesis decomposition

Cell No.

group DV_1

Mean

DV_1 Std.Err.

DV_1 -95.00%

DV_1 +95.00%

N

1 2

1 5.327324 0.801504 3.685518 6.969130 15 2 7.836534 0.801504 6.194728 9.478340 15

References

Related documents

In SSA Form, the fact that the interference graph is chordal yields a stronger guarantee of k -colorability than traditional coalescing methods, because merging vertices may not

Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Peru Country Office (W Mendoza MD), United Nations Population Fund, Lima, Peru; Breast Surgery Unit (T J Meretoja MD), Helsinki

505 Institute of Certified Public Accountants Retirement Benefits Scheme PN DC 506 Institute of Economic Affairs Staff Provident Fund Scheme PV DC 507 Institute of

over the thermoformed sheet. To make the cut, a sheet shear has been used, according to [29]. Thermoforming of specimens for tensile tests: a) Hybrid mould; b) Thermoforming of the

In the paper, the analysis modal and method of CEFR core assemblies are researched, considering the fluid structure interaction, the dynamic analysis of one row and three rows

At body temperature (37 o C), the gas solubilities and diffusivities are slightly higher, and thus we expect a corresponding increase in the rate of gas exchange and oxygen

However, whatever your industry, these e-business technologies will help you better manage your supply chain and fi nd increased effi ciencies in your operations,

The data were collected from 218 undergraduate nursing students using demographic data, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 42).The progressive muscle