Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
1-1-2007
Maybe
Kara Canal
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended Citation
MAYBE
KARA CANAL
THESIS
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Art
in Imaging Arts; Rochester Institute of Technology, submitted May 14, 2007.
Angela Kelly
Angela Kelly, Committee Chair
Date
Dan Larkin
Dan Larkin, Committee Member
Date
Patti Ambrogi
'2-oD/
Thesis/Dissertation Author Permission Statement
Title of thesis or dissertation:
_,_M ...
tj~~b_J,fi.__
__________________ _
Name of author:
kAlf
fA
CA.VIA {
Degree:
--:-0-M-:TP...,Pr'--;-c--;-;--.--::,--~---
Program:IMkblN&
Air.>
College:
~J~f~k~S~---I understand that ~J~f~k~S~---I must submit a print copy of my thesis or dissertation to the R~J~f~k~S~---IT Archives, per current RIT guidelines for the completion of my degree. I hereby grant to the Rochester Institute of Technology and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media in perpetuity. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.
Print Reproduction Permission Granted:
I,
k
Vl
V
6\
U
V\~
\ , hereby grant permission to the Rochester Institute Technology to reproduce my print thesis or dissertation in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or profit.Signature of Author: _ _ _ _
K_._C_a_n_a_I ______
Date:'f. /4i ·
01
Print Reproduction Permission Denied:
I, , hereby deny permission to the RIT Library of the Rochester Institute of Technology to reproduce my print thesis or dissertation in whole or in part.
Signature of Author: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: _ _ _ _ _
Inclusion in the RIT Digital Media Library Electronic Thesis
&Dissertation (ETD) Archive
I, , additionally grant to the Rochester Institute of Technology Digital Media Library (RIT DML) the non-exclusive license to archive and provide electronic access to my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media in perpetuity.
I understand that my work, in addition to its bibliographic record and abstract, will be available to the world-wide community of scholars and researchers through the RIT DML. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I am aware that the Rochester Institute of Technology does not require registration of copyright for ETDs.
I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached written permission statements from the owners of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis or dissertation. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my committee.
Print Reproduction Permission Granted:
I,
f
.::l
V ll\.
Ca.
VI.
evl
,
hereby
grant
permission to the Rochester
Institute
of
Technology to reproduce my print thesis
or
dissertation in
whole or
in part.
Any reproduction will not be
for commercial
use
or
profit.
Signature of
Author: __
K_. _C_a_n_a_I _________
_
f-Maybe Thesis abstract KaraCanal
Maybeconsistsof aninstallationspace embracingthreevideoprojections,each
presentingtheviewerwitha series ofdistilledmoments.
Every
connected elementintheinstallationprovides anopportunity forengagement withthe intangiblememoriesof
adolescence. Thevideo pieces presentfragmentsofnarratives andinviteviewerstofill
inthe gaps withtheir ownmemories,reflections and experiences. Thepoint of viewof
thecameraineach video positionsthevieweras avoyeur and assuchtheviewers are
grantedtheopportunitytopause,consider andreflect, and
hopefully
realize somethingnew aboutthemselveswhile participating intheactions contained whererepetition,
Realityiscontinuous, multiple,simultaneous, complex, abundant andpartly invisible.
The imaginationalone canfathomthisanditreveals itsfathomingsthrough art.
1.Introduction
videostillfrom Dream
My thesisproject, Maybe, consists of aninstallationspaceembracing aneonsign,
anemptywall withemptyphotoframes, andthreevideoprojections, eachpresentingthe
viewer with a series ofdistilledmoments.
Every
connected elementintheinstallationprovides anopportunity forengagement withthe intangiblemoments ofnostalgia. The
videopieces presentunfulfillednarratives and inviteviewersto fill inthegapswiththeir
ownmemories,reflections andexperiences. Thepoint of view ofthecameraineach
video positionsthe viewer as a voyeur and as suchtheviewers are grantedthe
opportunitytogaze withoutfearof
being
caughtwhileparticipating intheactionscontained whererepetition, sensuality andlossare played outwithout resolve.
Thework engagesnarrativeelements presentedwith alightness and(attimes)
laughterthatisnotpresentin myown past. Inthisthesis, I haverecastmy
history,
re-imagine.
My
thesisworkwas an explorationthatallowedmeto recontextualizemymemories and experiences.
My
interestinself-portraiture, memoryand childhood werefusedinthecreatingofMaybe, andthroughthe workIreconciled facetsofmy past
history
and present story.The developmentofmythesiswork camefrom adesireto
deeply
explorenarrative, memory andchildhood. However, Iwantedtocreate a personal workthat
wouldresonatebeyondthepersonalitself, toaddressthelargerconstructof childhood
memoryand narrative.
My
thesisexhibitionandinstallation, Maybe, isanamalgamationofideas fromthepasttwo years, as well as reflections ontheconfluenceofadolescence,
identity
and sensuality. Maybe isnot about one specific event orstory asitisrootedinmemory, and as such can only bea collage of gestures. Inthisway, it is many fragments
thatcombine and overlap. Theprocess ofcreatingmythesisproject was a process of
building
upandthencarefully peeling away images. The images I selectedtoshowforthesisexplored combinedto tellstories inadifferent way to and shareimagesthat"do
not existin isolation butspeak backandforthto one
another"
(Watson, 14). Thevideos
are notintendedtobe viewedsingularly, asthe meaningoftheworkIcreatedforMaybe,
evolvesinthespaces in between watchingone video to thenext. The storycomesfrom
thecollaboration ofimagesconnectingwiththeviewer. "Withoutastory,without an
unfolding, thereisno
meaning"
2. PhotographsPast
KingChristopher, Philadelphia,2001
Before I beginto talkaboutmyvideoworks,it is necessary formetorewind and
exploremy relationshipto photography and artmaking whichinformed my
journey
tovideo. I began photographingwhile under
deep
analysis; I havealways consideredmyphotographstobeself-portraits. Learningphotography concurrently whilein
psychoanalysismadethiscorrelation simpleto grasp, but difficultto explain. I had found
a newway ofcommunicating, alanguage ofimagesthattoldstoriesaboutmy
unconscious mind.
My
photographsrevealed,confessed, and spokeformewhenIhadno words. The GermanpoetRainer Maria Rilkespeaks to thisnotion ofwordlessnessin
Letterstoa
Young
Poet:Thingsare not so comprehensibleand expressibleas one wouldmostlyhave usbelieve;
mostevents areinexpressible, takingplace ina realmthatno wordhaseverentered, and
My
earliestblack andwhite photographsareunquestionably self-portraits.Inspirationtocreate arisesfrom my memories, desiresandsubjectivity. Theworkdoes
not possess a specific narrativethatcanbepinneddown. Rather, ittakesfrom many
sources, andisfragmented, orcollaged. The images I wasmaking wereprojections.
They
were placeswhere"emotionsorwishes"
that I sometimeshad
difficulty
acknowledging, were
"relocated" or
"projected"
in mywork(Childers, 246). Thereby,
my workbecomesamirror. Allthatwent unexpressed reappears and voicesitselfin my
images. Theimages,takentogether,tell astoryof what I wasthinking,
feeling
andexperiencing. The storiesthey speakare attimes anachronistic,
blending
andrecreatingpast andpresent, real andimaginary, allowing myunconsciousto beunlocked.
The unconscious seems analogousto raw, unedited video. It silently stores all of
ouremotions, dreamsand realities. Itcaptures our lifeinways similarto themagic
realism genre in literature. Magic realismauthors"interweave, inanever-shifting pattern,
asharply etched realismin representing ordinary events anddescriptive details together
withfantastic anddreamlikeelements, aswellaswith materialsderived frommythand
fairy
tales"(Fletcher). Magicrealismdraws from realityand conflatesitwiththe
mythological orcollective,enrichingthe storieswithacomplexitythatissimultaneously
paradoxical,poignant andhyperreal. Magicrealism isanotherwayofexplainingthe
connectionsbetween artmaking andthesubconscious. Whenthecreative mind
rummagesthroughitselftofind inspiration itpullsfromthe storiesthatwe already know
to compliment,or subvert. Considerthispassage from Milan Kundera's The Unbearable
Lightnessof
Being
wheretheauthorintroduces Tomas (will beone ofthe maincharacters)
by
reflectingon hisartisticprocessofvisualizing him:/ havebeenthinkingaboutTomas for manyyears. Butonly inthelight ofthesereflectionsdid Iseehim
clearly. Isawhim standingatthewindowofhis flatandlookingacrossthecourtyardattheopposite
walls,notknowingwhattodo.
Kunderaplaceshimself insidethe structure ofthenarrative, asboththeauthoras
wellasthe observer,and inso
doing
thereaderisgiventhedual pleasure ofseeingtheworld throughtheeyesofKunderathe author, Kunderathenarrator inthe story, aswell
as Kunderainthevoice ofthecharactersinthe story. Magicrealismisabout multiple
streams ofnarrative, thatflow inand out of each otherto compliment,reveal and add
tensiontoeachother.
My
intentionto blendthefantastical withtherealisticleadmeto explore video,asworking/thinking invideo providedme withtheopportunitytovisually editideasinways
atthe time inphotography forme.
Editing
moving images madetheconnection tonarrativemore immediate forme.
Galatea,Philadelphia, 2001
Ourunconscious stores all ofouremotions,dreamsandrealities. Weneverhave
enoughtimeto pause, rewindoreditour actions. To doso wouldbeagainstournature,
ordesire, as ourtendencyistomoveforwardso muchfallsunexamined.
Theevolution/process ofmy workisrelatedto theprocessof
discovering
theunexpected ofseeingthe unseen. I viewmywork asanalogousto the thrillof
looking
at whatthecameracaptured unknowingly. Thereexistsin almosteveryphotographa
magic spot,afavoriteglimmer oflight,a slant ofthebody, acaprice captured it issuch
photography is inits innateabilitytorecordtheun-conscious/seen. As Marianne Hirsch
explainsin her book
Family
Frames: Photography, Narrative, andPostmemory:Thecamerais likepsychoanalysis. Thereareoptical processesthatare invisibleto the
eye; themechanical processes ofphotographycan exposethem. The cameracanreveal
whatwe seewithoutrealizingthatwe do,justaspsychoanalysis can uncover what we
knowwithout
knowing
thatwedo: what isstored intheunconscious...justaspsychoanalysis canreveal unconsciouscontentthrough theformal and precisetechniques
ofthetherapeuticencounter(118).
The same enchantmentthatappearstomanifestinsidephotography,also existsin
videowork. Throughoutthepasttwoyears ofexploring photographyand video, I
objectively knewwhatIwas doing/making, therest waslefttomyunconsciousto work
out. I have faith in
following
my intuition, and onthedeep
connectionsbetweencreativityand analysis. I found mypath whenI leastexpected it. My workdialogues
withitself,and whatI wasthinkingandexploring isconnectedforme. Thefinal
body
ofworkthatcomprisedMaybe isa workthatIam confident requiredmy
letting
go. Thevideo worksin Maybeare a processtowardsunderstanding whatIknowwithout
knowing
astory ofthe unseen,or unspeakable inside of me.That said, myartisautobiographical,yetnot sospecificallythatthevieweris
excluded. Onthecontrary,Ibelieve myworkImade for Maybeallowsformultiple
opportunities fortheviewertoparticipate andidentify. Although I make workabout
myself,I am aware ofmyaudience, andhopeto
develop
adialoguethatincorporatesnotonlymyvoice andmy memories,butalsothatof a collectiveunderstandingof
experience.
Allofmy workexistsas amirror, andcansee me moreclearlythanIcan see
myself. Perhapsviewers who engage withmyworkmay seethings about myself(and
themselves)thatI amblindto. Itisthis possibility forknowledgeoftheunknownthat
spurns me ontocontinue creating.
By
exploring video I was ableto use myself(my
body)
topush myselftoexperienceunfamiliarterrainandtoexplore specific questions ofidentity. In myphotographicworkI lookedoutside myselfto seemyself. With myvideo
workI lookedtomyselfto see myself. Withavideo cameraI wasabletowatch myself
3.
Watching
Myself: Video Explorations>o V Cowe HomeA-Drinking (WithLovingon YourMind),
From ATara Karaokeproject,2002-3
Before I begantheactualthesis project, I made several relatedexplorationsin
video. The explorationsImade clearlyreflect my
journey
from theliteralto thesymbolic.
My
earliestvideos were moreconcrete,and haveadefinitivebeginning,middle and end.
My
thesis videoworkis looser in structure,and ismore concerned withpresenting a cohesive whole out offragmented parts each video informsthenext and
theconversationthatthey evoke iswhere themeaning is located.
As previously stated, my earlyphotographs were mirrors.
They
weredocumentsofmy surroundingsthatseemedto speakto me about loss,absence and
femininity
imagesthatillustratedthe storyofmy psychoanalysis. The sameprocessthatworked so
well asawayofmaking meaning in photography didnot translateinvideo. Ihadto
search out a new systemofimagemaking. Video making becameaseparate processfor
me.
Photographing was aboutexploring myenvironment anduncovering invisible
signs. Ididnotmake photographs ofmy friendsormyself, butusedthestreets and
strangersofPhiladelphiato standin formyself.
Making
the switchto workexclusivelyin video
during
graduate school encouragedmetoconstructanew methodofworking,with myself asmyprinciple subject.
Working
invideo provided mewitha newwayofapproachingmakingmeaning.In myphotographic workIfelt at animpasse. I wastryingtograpple withnarrative, but
intheprocessthe images feltforced, and insincere. Video granted me newness of
approach, andwiththis newness, anopportunitytocommunicate inanew language.
Moving
imagesmotivated me toseean alternativewaytocreate ina newdirection.Whilevideotrainedmetobe encouragedinadifferentway,the workI made
were still the samemirrors and self-portraits. The opportunitytomakethesamework in
anewmedium, tosay thesame thing inadifferentform,allowedme adifferentground
toreflect on. InvideoI recordedmylife,myself,my friends,my reality I captured
glimpses, stillsfromthestory ofmy life.
Subsequently
myrecent photographsare abletobewhattheyare because Iwasable toreconciledisparateparts ofmy creativity
throughworkingwith video. Inowbelieve thatIneededtowalkaway from
photographing tobecomethephotographerthatI am now.
I am thankful thatI did notlimitmyselfto photographyand allowed myselfthe
freedomto explore other media until Iarrived atmythesiswork.
FirstVideo Explorations/Experimentations
My
firstvideo wasHappy
Ending. Thethree-minute videois setto abubbly
popsongas peoplebounce inand outofthescreen seen sitting intheirbedseating. Thepiece
wasinspired
by
Yoko Ono'searly conceptual videosthatshemadewhile partoftheFluxusMovement.
Fluxusemerged outofDadaism,and artiststhat wereinvolvedwiththe
movement"valued simplicity over
complexity"
andbelievedthatart couldbemade out
ofanything. Allartwishingtobe alignedwiththe Fluxuxmovement shouldbe
concerned withtheintersectionofdisparatemedia andideas, andbe simple, fresh, and
fun. Yoko wasinterested in herimpulses,and hadsuchconfidence in her ideasthat she
sawthem through. Yoko's fearlessness,playfulness and confidencein her creativity
inspired meto trustmyself(in a newmedium)to besimple, fresh andfun.
33
stillfromHappyEnding,2002
The conceptforHappy
Ending
was uncomplicated: I askedmy friends in mygraduate cohorttoeattheirfavorite food in bed intheirunderwear. Thepiecelooks
carefree and light, andreferencesMTV'svideo aesthetic. Itisa reflection on
consumption, pleasure, and desire,and ultimatelywithAmerica's preoccupationwith
orality. Overindulgences infood, talkingor material consumption allfallunderthe
FreudianconceptofOralFixation. Althoughthisnotionwasnotmy intention in making
Happy
Ending, it becameclearthat thevideo was morethan thesum ofitsparts, andmyvideo explorationbecame moreofa social commentthanmereplay.
The abilitytoproduceabrightand colorful visually appealingwork was
somethingthat Ihadnever accomplishedbefore. The processofcreating
Happy
Endingallowed meto learnseveral lessons. Throughtrusting my instincts Iwasabletocraft a
video workthatwas objectively brightand bold. Icreated a piecethatwasintotal
oppositionto my stillblackandwhitephotographicwork.
Meaning
wasinitially
thoughttobe simply intheprocess, butthiswas notentirely so. Thedeeper meaningwas
(initially
latenttome)manifestedupon reflection and dialogue. Apatternofsettingcourse inonedirectionandarriving at an unintended position isthe threadthat connects
all ofmy artmaking processes,
The video worksthatIwasinvolvedwithmakingare all equally asimportantto
the finalthree thatI selectedto showin mythesisexhibition. Thevideosthat Iwas
workingonin betweenand concurrentlywithmythesisvideos are all part ofthe
developmentofmy artisticconfidence,exploringand
listening
untilmyworkbegantohave adialogue withitself.
By
seeing howcertain video pieces amplified orcomplimented eachother, I begantosee patterns emerge andthemesrepeat.
Radiohead'sCreep,from Kara Karaokeproject,2002-3
My
videos arelargely
aboutfeeling
out andperformingidentity
(andvanity). IntheKara KaraokeseriesI shotmyselfverycloseupandsang
directly
intothe camera. Iselectedpopsongsthatallowedmetoexpress a range of emotions and identities. Each video is stylistically similar,buteachlooksandfeels distinctiveasI triedondifferent personasin song. I made myselfmyown superstarinthese videos; I becomea
simulationof asimulation. Inthe shadowof
Cindy
Sherman performing for hercamera,Idressed up andperformedfor myvideocamera. Iplayed with
identity
notonlywithclothes and
lighting
decisions, butalso with songchoices.Trying
on (often opposing)identities urged metoquestionmy personal
ideology
of self andthe boundariescrossed overandmaintainedto compliment and complete a complex singular personality.Asis truefor manyartists Imost admire(GillianWearing, Pipilotti Rist,Jo
Spence, HannahWilke,FrancescaWoodman,
Tracey
Emin,KarenKilimnik) Iaminterestedin howwe locatetruthinouridentities. Videos and photographsare "an
interpretationoftheworld"
and
being
interpretations, howmuch residue ofthe realremains? (Sontag, 17). Howmuchtruthiseverpresent inart works?
By documenting
do wesubtly subtract an essence oftruth? In
Cry, I recordedmyselfextremely close-up
while crying. Thetearswerereal, butwhendoneinfrontofthecameraI wonder what
changed? Where didthe line blur betweenperformance and genuine emotion? The
experience ofshootingmyself while crying ofcapturinga rawnessof
feeling
wascathartic,butthe
boundary
betweenauthenticityand performance is difficultto teaseapart.
InperformingmyselfIhave adocumentofmypainand upset,butmoreessential
wastheprocess ofwatchingmyself outsidemyself, andwatchingothers reactto the
experience ofwatchingme.
Cry
isanecessarycomponent oftheexplorationprocessthatwent onbehindthescenes in workingtowardsMaybe. Thetearsthatareunseenin
Maybeareperhapswhat give it itsweight. Again, the idea inthe "invisiblepresentinthe
visible"
surfaces.
Reflecting
onthebody
of workI created overthepasttwoyearsthepunctum(Roland Barthe'stermfor
feeling
"pricked"or
"bruised"
by
animage)
islocatedhere inCry. Suchvisceral and up-close andobviouspainisnot atall apparentin mythesis
body
ofwork,yetthe tearsare
floating
aroundit,lurking
inthebackground. It istheabsenceofdiscernable emotionin Maybethatinfuses itwith wonder.
Maybeis arecreationof a specificmomentin myadolescenceinthree fragments
(three videos) andas such seeks notto tellastory,butto presentemotions. Viewed as a
whole, eachvideo colorsthe next, andcombinestopictureamemory,abreathora sigh
ofadolescence.
Final Walk-Through
Forget MeNot,2002
My
nextthreevideoswere shownduring
my finalWalk-Through. Eachshortvideo possessed adifferentfeel and approach. I was
investigating
myoptions withvideo,still searchingouttheboundaries, andexperimenting more
freely
with sound,place,narrative andrepetition.
ForgetMeNot,2002
Forget MeNotwasasilent shortthatshowed memeticulouslymakingmyselfup
in frontofthemirror andthenslipping intoabathtub
fully
dressed. The short videohasanambiguous ending.
Why
didIgetintothe tub? Did I drown myselfOphelia-style?Did I slipdownthedrain? Was it adream? Was itmeanttomaketheviewer laugh?Feel
sad?
I wastinkeringwithfilmicgenre,
specificallytheLouise Brooksfilmsfromthe
1930's. I wasenactingthe role ofthe exquisitelymade upheroinein myownsilent
movie. Iperformedtherole ofthe
lady
inwaiting,onlyto submergemyselffinally
inthebathtub. In Forget Me Not Iaddressed vanity,female identity, aswellasmy own
discomfortwithmyappearanceand strict adherenceto
beauty
rituals, and ofthepressure(imaginedornot)to presentan ideal image.
I returnedtothinking ofYokoOno,
finding
confidenceinmyselfto make anothervideo basedon a simple idea. Theresult was, again, avideopiecewhose questions are
largerthanI couldhaveanticipated. WiththispieceIwas
feeling
morecomfortableworking withvideo,
intuitively
givingovertheprocesstomy unconscious.Hymn,2002
The secondvideo I workedonfor my final walkthroughstandsout as
being
themost unlike all ofmy other videosbeforeor since. For Hymn I crosscutfootage of water
bothmanmade
(carwash)
and natural(Niagara Falls).By
manipulating thespeed andaddingsound Iabstractedthetwowaterysubjects. Thepiece isoutside ofmyother work
as it istheonlypiecethatdoesnothave me(orother women standinginfor me) in it.
The video isameditation,asilence,andahymn. Ithasrhythm, but itspeaks adifferent
languagethanall ofmyother videos. However,therhythm and repetitionthatitcarries
ispresent within allofmyvideos. Hymnstandsas a pauseorabridge betweenmy
earliervideo workand mythesisworkto come.
My
lastvideothat I showedfor finalWalk-Through was aprelude to thepath thatI wouldfollowwithmythesis work. Dream isavideo I madeinspired
by
adream.Previously, Ididnotconsciously make
anything
directly
from mydreams. Thisvideoremainsthe
key
tounderstandingalargepart ofmy thesis. In Dream afaceless youngwoman, dressed similarly toAlice inWonderland, slowly walksalonganempty cold
shore. Sheis involved in a ritual a ritual of
digging
up fresh rosesfromunderneaththeearth. Sherepeatsthisprocess over andover, untilshe can nolonger hold her bouquet.
The video repeats.
SigmundFreudwrites aboutacomplex calledtherepetition compulsion. The
repetition compulsion"endeavorstomakethepsychictraumareal to livethrough once
more a repetition ofit... especially inthe tendenciesof small
children"
(Freud, 131). The
"re-living"
ofatrauma throughmemories or actionswill continuewithout enduntilthe
recognition isaccepted thatfearof an unknown future (withoutthepain ofrepetition) can
be embraced.
Repetition in myvideowork canbeunderstood in lightofFreud'srepetition
compulsion.
My
videosareconcerned with repetition(in actions aswellasliterally
looping)
and obsessivelylooking
backwardsfor inspiration from my past.Attempting
tolook beyondthe past andforwardto an unknownfuture (freeofthe stains of
uncomfortable memories) iswhat isworked outintheprocess ofcreating.
Clinging
tomemory stagnates meemotionallyand artistically. The
inability
to stop repeatingpastmistakes(mistakes ofmemoryobsession, aswell)orreplaying/reliving pastemotions
induceparalysis. The repetitiveactions invideoisareflectionofmypatterns of
thought over andovermymind replaysthe pastuntil I can skippastthe sournessofthe
overly sentimental(whichisdestructive),and move onwardto a placewherenostalgia
can betamed(andnot surrenderedto).
4. Thesis: Dressesflutter, hands cling, andlegs swing
Custom blueneon signin myhandwriting,from Maybe
Ititledmythesis exhibitionMaybe, as it isa wordthatdenies immediate
resolution. Itisawordthatistemporary, as maybeleadstoan eventual yes or no.
Maybe isawordthatisinthemiddleand occupiesand ambiguousgroundwhere
possibilitiescantip forwardorback. Itisthismiddlegroundthatmy
body
knows best. Iam caught inthe middle,which is
intellectually
uncomfortable, but emotionally familiar.ThethreevideopiecesthatcompriseMaybealsohover inthemiddle ground. Eachvideo
teases in itsownway, (the hopeof aglimpse, orthehope of ananswer) andtotease isto
suggestapossibleyes, but ultimatelynotfollowthroughimmediately...but,maybe...
Maybe isan exploration invideothatsuggests anew wayofunderstandingmy
memoriesofmyadolescence. Themulti channel installationwas crafted specificallyfor
thespacethatI secured atVisual Studies Workshop. The largespace allowed meto
continue my explorationofscale. Eachvideowas projected inamanner specificto its
content, playing silently andsingularly,
occupyingitsown room. Thespace provided me
withtworoomsjoined
by
ahallway.Aplacefor viewingeach video was located inthefirstroom, the
hallway
andinthe last (andlargest)
room.EachvideoDream, Ride, and
Swing
loopedand allare under5 minutes inlength(Irecorded each video usingadigitalvideocamera, and editedthemall withFinal Cut
Pro). As withphotography, "scale ofthe
world"
is easily"fiddle[d]"
withinvideo
(Sontag,4). I usedthemechanismsofclose-uptosuggest distortedscale but also
"fiddled"
withsize/scale in how I electedtoproject each video. Scalewasan integral
componentto the exhibition. This diagramwill
help
to illustrate howeachvideo wasplaced ina specificdesigntounderscore itsmeaning:
installation map
hallway
ride
8x5"
dream
2x3'
visualstudiesworkshop
april 2003
"Orderandtheexacttimefor
looking
areimposed"
inthe layoutdesign,yetthere isno
oneway toencounterthe work(Sontag, 5). Multipleways ofexperiencingthework was
part oftheimpetus behind thearrangement. Each video relatesto thenext,the images
overlappingand
blending
inthe viewers mindwithout order.Dreamwasthefirstvideothat theviewers encountered whenenteringthe
installation space. Thevideo wasprojected 5'x3'
directly
ontothe floorofthegallery.Viewerscouldwalkaround andoverthevideo. Because itwas shot withalow
perspective,anddealtwithuncovering andrecovering, itfeltnaturalto project onthe
floor. It isa piecethatisabout getting downon yourknees,getting
dirty
and searchingforbeauty, hopeandlife. Itrevives. Itrepeats.
stillfromRide,2003
Ride followed intheadjoining hallway. Thevideo played opposite awallofempty
pictureframes ina smallframed
5"x8"
monitor. Thisvideoshowedthesame young
woman, againwithout
focusing
onher face rocking slowly backandforthon a redplaygroundhorse. Thevideo, likeDream, hasaslownessthatismysterious,as it isnota
speed inwhich we expect such actionsto occur. It movesback andforth, backandforth,
forever. The movementinthepieceis simple,andcombined withthe videointhe last
roomitenlarges and echoes.
stillfromSwing,2003
Swing
was projected aroundthecorner fromridedirectly
ontothelarge 12"xl5" wall.Thetransitionfromtheminiaturetothe gigantic wasimportant. I wantedthe viewersto
takepiecesfromeachofthe twoprevious videosandthenendup in alargeroom with
one enormous video. Swing, simply,isthe same youngwoman swinging backandforth.
The camera was positionedbehindthe swinger, sothepoint of viewisthatof avoyeur, a
secret glimpseupthedress isalmost granted. Theteaseofthe videoiswhere its strength
resides. I asktheviewertoimaginewhattheythinkthey should be seeing, and whatthey
actuallyare seeing. Whatdothey wantto see? Whatdo theyseeinthe piece afterseeing
theprevioustwo? Howdo allthree ofthevideos interactwithinthe space?
A waytoreconcilethe threevideosistounderstandthattheyall are
concerned with looking. Eachvideo relies onthepleasure wederive fromwatching.
Laura
Mulvey
addressesthisscopophilic instinct (thepleasure involved inlooking
atother people's
bodies)
famously
in herseminalessay, Visual PleasureandNarrative
Cinema.
Mulvey
usespsychoanalytictheorytomake an argumentagainst Hollywood'scontinual productionoffilmsthatplace womeninrolesthatsupportandreinforce how
society regards andlooksat women. Her essay is bound upwiththe CastrationComplex,
and she
boldly
asserts, "therepresentation ofthefemalespeaks castration andnothingelse"
(Mulvey, 362).
Women,accordingtoMulvey, represent
bleeding
woundsto men earlymemoriesofboth horrorand fascination. Itisthe memoryofhorrorthatactivatesthe
ambivalent attitudethatpatriarchal society embodies.
Being
so simultaneouslyattractedto,and repulsed
by
womenhasresultedin a societalstructurethat, frustrated, fantasizesand abhorswomen. Suchambivalence isreflected incinema.
"Cinemais an advanced representation system; itposesquestionsofthewaysthe
unconscious structureswaysofseeing and pleasurein looking"(362). Cinemaevolvedat
thesametimeas psychoanalysis. It isnowonderthat thetwoare so naturallyenmeshed.
The twoshare alanguage,as wellas ahistoricalperiod. Ifcinemaisarepresentationof
ourunconscious,thenthequestion thatMulvey asks: howcan onefightthe unconscious?
seems tobethe thrustofheressay.
Thirty
years later, it seemsissues she raiseshaveremainedunresolved.
Hollywood is abarometerofthe"dominant ideologicalconceptsof
cinema"
(362). Further, cinema isabarometerofdominantpatriarchalprerogatives. Thepower
of cinemaisacknowledged, and
Mulvey
seeksto usetheinnate powerofcinematopoliticallyaugmentthe dominantorder. Ifmainstream cinema goes
"unchallenged"
as
Mulvey
fearsthatHollywoodwill continueto "manipulate visualpleasure"
to "reinforce
a masculinist ideology"(362).
Mulvey
anticipatesthat"alternativecinema[can]
provide aspaceforacinematobe bornthatisradical in botha politicaland anaesthetic senseand challenges
thebasic assumptions ofthemainstream film"(370). Regrettably,mainstream cinema
has notyetbeen satisfactorily challenged. Alternative cinemahastakenavery
long
timeto surfaceas a seriousthreat to the Hollywood machine.
Only
now, thirtyyearslater,aretheirfilmsthatactively compete against Hollywood'spredictable plotlines. Cinema
indeed hasthepowerto reinforceexisting fascinationsand social constructions,and
by
creating analternative cinemanew possibilities canbeproposed and/or adopted.
The construction of pleasureis a radical weapon. We cannot
destroy beauty
orpleasure topromote change. Ifwe subtract visual pleasurefrom filmsthe
industry
wouldcome to agrinding halt. Cinemaisvisual pleasure.
Fiction offers an escape. Whenthe general public goesto agallery,museum or
theatre,theydo soto beeducated, entertained andamused. Thepower of visual pleasure
can be usedto seducethe viewer,but itcan be dealtwithinwaysthatdonot adhereto
thesupport of patriarchical ideals.
I say use visual pleasure againstitself. Usethelureof womento seduceandto
thensubtletyassertidealsthatrail againstpatriarchy ifthisisthefilmmaker's/video
maker's goal. To subtract
beauty
fromcinemaistoendcinema. Idid notmakemyvideoswiththeaim ofsupportingaspecifically male gaze. As afemale artist who uses
movingimagestoconvey meaning,I haveconsidered
Mulvey
's call forcinemathatcanreconstruct and repairhowsociety views women. What happenswhenawoman
constructstheimagethatisprojectedonto a screenespecially whenthe subjectsthatshe
choosesto show are women engagedin actsthatare undeniably sexualized? What
responsibilitydo Ihave as afemaleartistto show womeninadifferentway?
Luckily
E. Ann Kaplan has answeredthisdilemma formeby highlighting
howMulvey
's essay failstoaddresshowproblematic counter-cinemain actualitywouldbe.Mulvey
also failstoadmitthatHollywood filmsdo indeedbring
pleasureto womenviewersdespite thefactthatthey do rely ontheofttimesunfavorablepositioningof
womento elicit suchpleasure.
Throughthe theis work, I am nottakingontheweightrenegotiatingthemalegaze; I was
simply showing imaginedrituals and gestures. Myconsciousdecisionto leave outany
indicationof specific
identity
(I never showedanyfaces)
supportsmy ideaofmakingpiecesthatcould not onlycohere stylistically,butalsoto make another spaceforthe
viewer/readertoprojectthemselvesmoreeasily into theimages. Ididnot usethe
close-up ofabeautifulfemale face;I usedtheclose-upof gestures.
Gestures are "consideredtobe thefirst form oflanguage, and as suchthey can
teachus aboutthenature oflanguage" (Childers, 126). By removingwordsand sound I
wantedtodo exactlythis-stripdown languageto itsprimitiveform. Weknowgestures
aswell asweknowourownlanguage. It is a separatelanguagethatwe are allfluentin,
weneed onlyto pause andreflect on gesturesto seetheweightthatthey cansimply
convey. Gesturesmimic or standinforwords, theydo not needwords,buttheyrely on
them, muchlikecinema andanalysis.
"Theprocessof cinema mimicsin manywaysthoseofthe
unconscious" (Kaplan,
314). Thereexists a reciprocalrelationship betweenwhat I unconsciouslywishto tell
and whatI actualdotell. The unexpected the surprisethatisinherentinallofmy
videos engagesthiselemental principle. Furthermore, "ifpsychoanalysisisatool that
will unlockthemeaningof
dreams,
it should alsounlockthatoffilms"(315).The samelanguagethatweuseto describeourdreams isusedtodescribe films.
Thisisno coincidence. 1895 wasthe yearthatsawthebeginnings ofbothcinema and
psychoanalysis. "Thesetwopowerful ways ofseeing and
knowing
theworld appearedtogether towards theend ofthenineteenth
century"
(LeBeau,2).
They
aretwinsin manyways.
They
rely on oneanother. Filmandanalysis are lessconcerned with surfacethantheyarewiththeunseen. Theunderground, the back-stage,theunconsciousiswhere
truth is located.
5. The End
fe'
"stillfromDream,2003
Maybe,hovers inanambiguous state.Itrefusestopromiseordeny. It
embodiestheexistentandimaginary. Theworkdoesnotpossess a specific narrative;
ratherit isasuggestion ofactionsthatrely onthe
interplay
ofimagesto completeindividual meaning foreachviewer. Itswingsbetween reality andfiction,andexists asa
"duplicate world, of areality inthe seconddegree, narrowerbutmore dramatic"thanlife
(Sontag, 52).
The best way formetoapproachtalking aboutthisworkisto firstsuggestthatmy
words are not meantto decodewhatIhave made.Rather I believethatmy wordsare
parallelwiththeworkI havemade.
My
wordsdonot runintothe videos, theystandalong sidethem. Maybe is subjectively aboutrebirth, reawakening, renewal,and
re-arrival.
Theprocess of repetition (looping)can, with eachrevolution, allowfor imagesto
changetheirmeaning. Repetitioncan mesmerize, lullandtake theviewer somewhere
else. This isone ofmy goals in creating to invitetheviewerto placesunknown or
unexpected. To havethemremembersomethingaboutthemselvesthatthey forgotandto
suggest a newway ofrememberingandknowing.
My
graduate workhasfocusedonmemory, identity, and lossand adolescence.Thesearethe thingsI knowbest. Thework in Maybe leanstowardsan inflationofideas
aboutmemoryand
identity
withnotions ofsexuality andchildhoodmemories. IfI couldreduce mychildhood memories toa single moment maybeitwouldbemerocking back
andforthwith green grassunderneath me and sun onmy bareshoulders.
stillfromRide,2003
Asanartist,I am aspyonthe world. Asa childI was(and Ibelieve I still am)
very goodatstudyingpeople'sidiosyncrasiesand gestures. I obsessivelynotedhow
people interacted,howpeople lookedwhentheythought noonewaslooking. I love
subtlety. Thatsaid, Ithinkit isclearerforme tounderstand thepositionI am
approachingwithmywork. Apositionthatis concernedwithwatching,thinkingand
finding
joy
andhopefulness in a worldthatI onceconceivedof asbeing
aprettysourplace. ThingsthatI oncethoughtof as
having
gigantic importance nowseem miniature."All ourstories are about what happensto our
wishes"
(LeBeau,22). Equally, all
thatI make is about whathappensto my wishes.
My
work allows meto see whathashappened in mypast and project itintothepresent.
By
seeing my stories, Icansee moreclearly into myself. Arthas theabilityto change, muchlike psychotherapy. Thetelling
andsharing,muchliketherapy exchanges,iswhatisimportant.
My
goal in creatingthiswork wasto suggest astory without words. I explorednumerous approaches and arrived ata
body
ofworkthatwassilent and gestural. ThethreevideosthatcompriseMaybe flowthroughone another. Withintheinstallationthe
viewercatches glimpsesofastoryandisencouragedto connectonevideoto thenext,
allowingastoryoftheirowncreatingtounfold. Thevideos stirquestions, which
hopefully
remindtheviewersofthemselves.By
employingnarrativeelements(close-up,repetition, fantasy, memory) Isuggest astorywithout
delivering
one.My
aspirationwasto not present aresolved andcomplete story (orevenastoryatall), buttoorganize andpresentthe elements(culled
from myimagination, memoryand
dreams)
to providean experiencefortheviewertomakeup theirown.
Maybeattemptedto createaspace where the viewer couldexperience myimages
andbechallengedtoconnectoneworkto thenext.
By
entering my installation I wantedtheviewertodiscover somethingaboutthemselves that couldconnectthem
immediately
to thework. Maybe is aseries ofmomentsthat theviewer can piece togethertoconstruct
theirownideasofmeaning andhistory. To possibly spark adialoguethatarisesfrom
exposureto otherexperiences.
The workthatI have begun atRIThasprovided me withtheconfidenceto continue
exploring my interest innarrative. Since
leaving
RIT I havereturnedto photography,and have beencreatingimagesthatare stillsfrommy life. TheimagesthatI ammakingnowhavea voicethat isverydifferentthanmy earlyimages.
My
newphotographsarebrighter, lessconstrainedthanmy early blackand white images. Thesubject matteris
portraiture andlandscape. Iam stillinterested inmemory,but less specificallywith
childhoodmemoryand more withthecreationof newmemories. Mypassionfor
photographing has beenrenewed
by
an exploration ofmakingvideo. Theprocess ofexploringanewmediumtookmeon a
journey
thathas ultimately returned meto photographing.Maybe isa collection ofvideosthatnowstandsasarelicto mypast, artistically as well asemotionally. Theprocesshasallowedbeto stepout fromthe repetition
compulsion
by
allowing metoreflect onthepreviouslyunseen motivatorsthat were at the heartofthework. Iwasable tosay what Ihad (andstill have) nowordsfor,by
expressingmyself visually.
Iam presentlyconcerned with colorphotography, andcreating imagesthat
memorializethepeopleandplaces I am surroundedby. Aswithmyvideocamera, I
recordthestorythatis my life. TheconfidencethatI gained
by
exploringvideohas allowed me torenewmy relationship withphotography withaconfidenceandself-awarenessthatI did not realizebefore.
I am no longerinterestedin mining my pastforimages. Theprocess I exploredwhile
constructingmythesis workhas (fornow)allowedmeto step away from thecompulsion
to relive andremember and repeatmypast. I usethepresenttense to inspiremycurrent
photographic work.
My
photographsnow seektopreservethe poetryoftheplaces andspacesthatget passed
by
joyfully
transformingtheordinary to theextraordinary.* * *
April isthecruelestmonth,
breeding
Lilacsout ofthedead land,mixing
Memory
and desire,stirringDull rootswithspringrain.
JustasElliott conflates
beauty
withpain, lifewithdeath inone shortverse, I hopeto continuetocreate artinspired
by
my experiences both bitterand sweet. Itis mygoalas anartisttolocatevisual poetry in unlikelyplaces like Elliott tocreate and share
imagesthatare concentrated with
beauty
andhonesty.Beauty
thatisbittersweet, like lilacsblooming
in April.Works Cited
Berger,
John. Another Way ofTelling. Vintage Books: NewYork, 1 982Carrier, David. WritingAbout Visual Art. School ofVisual Arts: NewYork,
2003
Childers, J,editor. Columbia
Dictionary
ofModernLiterary
and Cultural Criticism.Columbia
University
Press: NewYork, 1995Eliot.T. S. The Wasteland. 1922 <http://www.bartleby.com/201/Lhtml>.
Freud, Sigmund.
Dictionary
ofPsychoanalysis. Greenwich:Fawcett, 1966.Hirsch, Marianne.
Family
Frames; Photography,Narrativeand Postmemory. HarvardUniversity
Press: Boston, 1997Kaplan, E. Ann. "IstheGaze Male?" PowersofDesire: The Politics ofSexuality.
Monthly
Review Press: NewYork, 1983Kundera, Milan. The Unbearable Lightness ofBeing. London: Faber, 1985.
Lao-Tzu. Tao Te Ching. Trans. Stephen Addis and
Stanley
Lombardo. Indianapolis:Hackett, 1993.
LeBeau, Vicky. Psychoanalysisand Cinema: The
Play
ofShadows. Wallflower:London,2001
Mulvey, L. "Visual Pleasure andNarrative Cinema."Art After Modernism:
RethinkingRepresentation. The New Museum ofContemporary Art: NewYork,
361-374.
Rilke, Rainer Maria. Letters toa
Young
Poet.New York: Norton, 1993.Sontag, Susan. OnPhotography. New York: Farrar, StrausandGiroux, 1977.
Spence, Jo. Cultural Sniping: The ArtofTransgression. Routledge: London, 1995
Winterson, Jeanette. Art Objects: Essayson
Ecstasy
andEffrontery. Vintage Books:NewYork, 1995