Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
9-1-1982
Direct diffusion resist for gravure
Wilson Hurst
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact
.
Recommended Citation
by
Wilson Hurst
A
thesis
submittedin
partialfulfillment
ofthe
requirementsfor
the
degree
ofMaster
ofScience
in
the
School
ofPrinting
in
the
College
ofGraphic
Arts
andPhotography
ofthe
Rochester
Institute
ofTechnology
September
1982
Thesis
Advisor:
Professor
Walter Home
Adjunct
Advisor:
Professor Julius
Silver
Seho
ol
of
Prl
nU~
llo
chuh r
In
H
itu t
.
of Tec
hnoloU
Iloc h u u r,
~
e
"
Y
o r k
Clla'rIFICUJi
0'
.l,PPIIOV ,u.
1lI
1
h
on
Hu
l'llt
,,1 th
a
....j
o r
In
prlnU~
Te
e hnol o«J'
h
u
b
,
un
..ppro
v
e
d
bl t
ho
!he
. i .
Commit te.
a
o
.atiof
aetol")'
Cor
t
ho
t
h
e
d
e
N
qu
l re..e
n
t
Cor
t
h
o
Ku t.
r
of Sci.
nco d
Ol l'll. at tho
convoe
atlo
n
of
Halt
<0
.
Han
o
Joo
<>ph
L.
:roW"
rep
roduee
an kIT theli
•
•
I
WII.5".<)
!/ur5.-r
hereby (g
rant
,
den
y)
permi
.
sion
to the
W
a~l&e
e
Me
eor ia~
Library
,
ot
"
. 1 .'1'.,
to
r
ep r Odue e
-r
the
s
i
s
in
w
hol e or In part
.
Any rep
rOduotion vi
I I
not b
e
(Or
e~
erol&l
use or protit
.
1
pr
ehr
to b
e
eontlLeted eseh tim
e
a re
'luut
to
r
re
produe ti on
is
m
a de.
I
can be
resched a
t t
he (oll
owing
a
ddre
s
s
.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Professor
Tom
Hill
providedinvaluable
help
andguidance on
this
project.His
knowledge
ofimaging
technology
andseemingly limitless
accessto
photographicliterature
is
truly
amazing.Page
List
ofFigures
---v
Abstract
---__-__-_-l
Chapter
1
Introduction
---i
Section
One:
Theoretical
Basis
---10
Chapter
2
Statement
ofProblem
__-_-____n
Chapter
3
Hypothesis
---15
Chapter
4
Background
Theory
---16
Chapter
5
Literature
Review
---21
Section
Two:
Methodology
---27
Chapter
6
Verify
the
Ferric
Concept
---28
Result
32
Chapter
7
Test
for
Speed
Enhancement
---34
Result
---36
Chapter
8
Test
for
Physical
Relief
Characteristics
37
Result
39
Section
Three:
Data
Analysis
---41
Chapter
9
Discussion
ofResults
---42
Chapter 10
Summary
andConclusion
---47
Chapter
11
Recommendation
for
Further
Research
--50
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
Section
Four:
Reference
Material
---53
Footnotes
_________---54
Bibliography
---58
Appendix:
Preparation
ofFerric
Oxalate
64
Page
Process
ofInsolubility
---12
Resist
Transferred
to
Plate
---12
Photopolymer
Process
for Direct
Gravure
- -12
Photosensitive
Iron
Salt
Systems
---17
Sensitivity
ofFerric
Salts
---19
Poitevin's
Original
Pigment
Process
Formula
---28
Modified
Formula
---30
Speed
Test
Formulations
---34
Physical
Relief
Test
Formulations
---38
Sample
ofPhysical
Relief
Test
- - -40
Characteristic
Curve
----____---45
Typical
Family
ofCurves
withSolarization
at
Various
Development
Times
---46
Fig.
13
Solarization
-Temperature
of
Exposure
Variation
---52
ABSTRACT
One
ofthe
most attractive attributes ofthe
gravureprocess
is
its
ability
to
print a variableink
film
by
virtue of cell
depth
variation.
This
celldepth
variationis
achievedthrough
the
use of adiffusion
resist.All
diffusion
resists arenegative-working
and,
afterexposure,
require
transfer
to
plate or cylinder.A
"negative-working"resist
is
one wherethe
emulsionbecomes
insoluble
to
the
developing
solutionin
those
areas struckby
actinicradiation.
Presently
availableresists,
which aredirectly
applied
to
plate or cylinder priorto
exposure,
are notcapable of
controlling
celldepth
variation.Thus,
the
tone
range obtainable
in
the
printis
limited.
This
sacrificehas
been
justified
by
advantagesinherent
in
the
direct
system,
such as ease of application and seamlessimage
capability.
It
has
long
been
recognized,
however,
that
adirect
system capable of variable celldepth
control wouldbe
most advantageous.The
purpose ofthis
study
is
to
examinethe
possibleapplication of a
radiation-sensitive/positive-working
iron
salt system
for
use as adirect
diffusion
resist."Positive-working"
refers
to
an emulsion whichbecomes
of
dichromate
rangesfrom
2.5
to
5
percent.The
time
ofimmersion
varies
with
the
temperature,
the
pH,
andthe
strength of
the
bath.
The
water
content ofthe
gelatinbefore
sensitizing
is
also mostimportant.
In
generalpractice,
gravuretissues
areimmersed
in
the
dichromate
bath
for approximately three
minutes."Carbon
tissue
is
along-scale
process which canaccurately
reproduce atone
range of1.30
to
as much as1.50
withoutgoing
into
the
under-or over-exposed regions of
the
2
photographic reproduction curve."
Despite
many
disadvan
tages
associated withthe
instability
ofdichromated
colloidlayers,
no other radiation-sensitive materialhas
been
found,
up
to
the
present,
which cando
the
job
so well.The
sensitized anddried
pigment paperis
then
exposedbehind
a photogravure screen which consists of opaquesquares separated
by
narrow,
clearlines
(about
150
to
175
lines
to
the
inch).
The
clearlines
areusually
about1/3
the
width ofthe
opaque squares whichthey
separate.The
effect of
this
screen exposureis
to
form
a network ofinsoluble
lines
ofhardened
gelatin.The
nextstep
is
to
the
screenedtissue
behind
a continuous-tone
positive
transparency.
This
resultsin
a negative resistin
whichhistorical
roots ofthis
concept are explored andthe
results
ofempirical
tests
explained.
It
is
concludedthat
the
reliefcharacteristics
of such a resist system aremanifest
in
the
solarization region ofthe
characteristicThe
physical nature of a pictorial system affectsthe
visual
appearance
of a graphicimage
andthereby
altersthe
information
it
contains.
An
advantage conventional gravurehas
over other photomechanical pictorial systemsis
that
the
image
carrier cantransfer
moreink
to
the
shadows.The
maximum
density
ofthe
shadowsin
offset orletterpress
depends
mainly
onthe
width ofthe
halftone
dots,
and oncehalftone
dots
achievetheir
maximumwidth,
the
only
way
to
gain a
denser
black
is
to
runthe
printthrough
the
press asecond
time.
By
comparison,
gravure candeposit
much moreink
in
the
shadows with one printing.Because
gravureink
can
blend
together
in
the
deepest
tones
and obscurethe
gravure-screen
pattern,
the
shadows of a well made gravureprint possess a
velvety
richness.In
addition,
the
gravureimage
carrier consists ofink
depths
that
create realgrays,
rather
than
just
dots
of various widthsthat
giveonly
anoptical
illusion
of gray.Thus
the
tonal
scale of a gravureprint can contain subtleties
impossible
to
convey
with adot-halftone
image.
It
is
this
inherent
printquality
ofgravure which stimulates
my
interest
in
the
process.The
diffusion
resist usedin
gravureto
achieve cellsand uniform colloid
film.
After
properexposure,
the
colloid
film
is
developed
outto
varying
thicknesses
in
proportion
to
the
tone
values ofthe
image.
This
reliefimage
provides a physical mechanismby
which subsequentetching
of plate or cylinder canbe
controlled,
allowing
depth
of cellto
vary
from
shadowthrough
middletone
to
highlight.
It
achievesthis
processthrough
adiffusing
action,
whereby
particles ofliquids,
gases,
or solidsintermingle;
the
result oftheir
spontaneous movement causedby
thermal
agitation.As
dissolved
substances,
they
movefrom
a region ofhigher
to
one oflower
concentration.The
cell
depth
range obtained allowsfor
a printin
whichthe
ink
film
thickness
is
varied acrossthe
image
area.The
colloid usedin
gravure resists whichis
capable ofsuch action
is
pigmented gelatin.This
gelatinis
sensitized
with either abichromate
or a silverhalide.
Of
the
two
sensitizers,
the
bichromate
is
more prevalent.Pigmented
gelatin(also
known
as carbontissue)
comesfrom
the
manufacturer,
coated on a paperbacking
or othersuitable support.
The
purpose ofthe
pigmentis
to
makethe
image
visible.The
resist emulsionmay
also contain othermaterials
to
renderthe
tissue
more pliable andto
improve
the
working
qualities ofthe
tissue.
For
storagereasons,
it
is
usually
unsensitized and shouldbe
kept
in
an atmosof
the
positivetransparency
are represented onthe
exposedtissue
by
different
thicknesses
ofhardened
gelatin.This
hardening
starts onthe
surface ofthe
resist and continuesdownward
toward
the
support.The
exposuretime
varies withthe
composition ofthe
sensitizedtissue,
the
age ofthe
tissue,
andthe
prevailing
atmospheric conditions.Following
the
exposure,
the
carbontissue
is
ready
for
transfer,
in
the
desired
position,
to
the
mechanicalimage
carrier
by
a processknown
aslaydown.
It
is
this
laydown
procedure which classifies a resist as
being
ofthe
transfer
type.
In
gravure,
the
most commonprinting
surfaces arecopperized cylinders or
thin
copper plates.The
surface ofthe
copper mustbe
madechemically
clean(free
from
greaseand
dirt)
priorto
transfer.
In
theory,
the
transfer
ofthe
tissue
is
avery
simple operation.In
practice,
however,
close attention and much experience
is
required.Possibly
the
most serioustrouble,
specifically
in
four-color work,
is
maintenance of registration and consistentimage
size.Development
involves
immersing
the
image
carrier,
onwhich
the
exposed resisthas
been
transferred,
into
abath
of warm water.
The
time
interval
between
completion ofminutes
to
15
minutes.
Gelatin
whichhas
been
hardened
during
the
exposure
does
notdissolve
in
the
warm water andremains
onthe
image
carrier.
The
unexposed and solublegelatin
is
washedfrom
the
image
carrier.The
backing
paper
is
removed andthe
warm watertreatment
is
continueduntil all
the
gelatin whichhas
notbeen
hardened
by
exposure
has
been
washedaway,
(anywhere
from
8
to
20
minutes).
Because
the
resisthas
straight-line characteristics,
which areadversely
modifiedby
too
high
adeveloping temperature,
115F
is
usually
recommended.After
development,
the
remaining
gelatinis
allowedto
dry.
On
the
cylinder or platethere
is
now adeveloped
outgelatin resist which varies
in
thickness.
In
effect,
arelief
image
ofthe
originalis
faithfully
transferred
to
the
image
carrier.The
wholeimage
is
cutup
by
the
fine
mesh of
the
screen,
which will serve a mechanicalfunction
to
makeprinting
possiblelater.
All
other non-image areasof
the
image
carrier are protected with anacid-resistant,
turpentine-benzol-asphalt varnish.
When
ready,
the
image
carrieris
subjectedto
ferric
chloride solutions of
varying
concentrations.The
ferric
chloride penetrates
the
resist proportionalto
the
radiation
hardened
gelatin,
the
rate of penetrationdepending
onthe
thickness
ofthe
resist.the
darkest
tones
ofthe
image
have
been
etching
for
awhile,
the
etching
solutionis
changedto
a moredilute
concentration.
This
will swellslightly
thicker
gelatin andstart
etching
the
nexttones
onthe
scale.
Those
areaswhich are
already
etching
continueto
etch moredeeply.
By
applying progressively
weakerferric
chloridesolutions,
the
variablethickness
resistis
progressively
penetrated.This
is
done
untilthe
areascorresponding
to
the
highlights
of
the
originalhave
been
slightly
etchedbut
notthe
screenlines.
The
rate offerric
chloridediffusion
is
alsoinfluenced
by
ambienttemperature
and relativehumidity,
andis
acceleratedby
anincrease
of eitherfactor.
As
the
thickness
ofthe
resistis
doubled,
the
time
of penetrationbecomes
approximately
eighttimes
aslong.
The
screenlines
form
a raised pattern onthe
image
carrier which willprevent
the
"doctor"blade
from wiping
the
ink
out ofthe
etched areas
during
printing.On
completion ofthe
etchcycle,
the
action offerric
chloride
is
stoppedby
washing
the
image
carrier withwater.
The
varnish and resist are removed with suitablesolvents.
The
gravure pressis
one ofthe
simplestprinting
mechanisms
known.
The
printing
is
governedby
the
a
thin-bodied/low
viscosity
ink.
The
image
surfaceis
then
scraped clean
by
a steel "doctor"blade
leaving
the
etchedcells
full
ofink.
This
ink
is
subsequently
transferred
to
the
substrate under pressure.By
this
systematicprocedure,
original
photographs or artwork are reproduced withexcellent
tone
values anddetails.
The
enhancedtonal
capabilities ofConventional
Gravure
are not achieved without some sacrifice.
An
intrinsic
difficulty
ofthe
processis
the
requirementfor very
accurately
controlling
the
depth
ofthe
etched cellsthroughout
the
tone
range.In
practice,
the
normal range ofdepths
from
ahighlight
areato
a shadowis
ofthe
order of1
to
14.
Gravure
cells are quite shallow.They
are nodeeper
than
approximately
.002inch
in
the
shadowareas,
where
they
arethe
deepest,
and muchless
deep
in
all otherareas.
All
ofthe
tone
values of animage
mustfit
accurately
into
this
narrow range ofdepths.
Every
step
ofthe
processfrom
continuous-tone positivetransparency
through
to
etchedimage
carrier mustbe
controlled withextreme care.
Some
ofthe
steps arevery
difficult
to
control,
especially
carbonprinting
where some variationis
unavoidable.
An
inherent
physical manifestation ofdichromated
gelatin exposedto
actinic radiation requiresthat
the
resistbe
transferred
to
the
image
carrier afterexposure.
This
transfer,
or"laydown"
consuming
andrequires
a greatdeal
ofcraftsmanship.
Even
with
the
greatest
care,
it
is
difficult
to
produce numeroussets of
color
separated resists which will etchconsistant-ly.
"For
reasons
which areby
no meansfully
understood,
carbon
tissue
printslaid
in
succession on a cylinder seldometch
together.
The
skilled etcher must attemptto
adjustthe
differences
whileetching.
The
difficulties
in
producing
consistent
resists with carbontissue
aregreatly
increased
when,
asis
oftenthe
case,
a number of separatecarbon
tissue
laydowns
have
to
be
made onthe
samecylinder."-5
Resists
which aredirectly
appliedto
a plate orcylinder
in
liquid
form,
priorto
exposure,
do
existin
the
gravure
industry.
These
resists arerelatively
inexpensive
and
easy
to
use.Precision
equipmentto
accurately
apply
these
resistsis
prevalent.Unfortunately,
these
resistshave
nodiffusion
action and resultin
comparatively
limited
tonal
capabilities.Despite
this
inherent
limitation,
these
resists are used
extensively
for
packageapplications
andother areas where
tone
rangeis
unimportant.It
is
the
purpose ofthis
study
to
examinethe
possibility
ofdeveloping
adiffusion
resist,
capable oftonal
differentiation,
which canbe
directly
appliedto
the
gravure
image
carrier priorto
exposure.
Preliminary
possibility
ofusing
iron
salts as sensitizersfor
such aresist.
This
paperexamines
the
feasibility
of such aconcept
by
tracing
historical
roots andexploring
empiricalSECTION
ONE
11
CHAPTER
2
STATEMENT
OF
THE PROBLEM
A
basic
problemexists
in
all availabletypes
oftransfer
resists;
a problemwhich,
in
fact,
dictates
that
the
resistbe
transferred.
As
previously
stated,
wherethe
light
strikesthe
resist,
that
areais
renderedinsoluble
to
development
andremains
to
form
the
image
in
varying
thicknesses.
There
is,
however,
one unfortunatefact.
The
exposuresource,
radiating
from
the
front,
causesthe
insolubility
to
proceedfrom
the
surfacedownwards.
The
underlying
strata nearestthe
support are still soluble and will washaway
in
the
development,
leaving
the
surfaceimage
or resist more orless
without support.This
process ofinsolubility
is
diagrammed
in
Figure
1,
which showsthe
original support andlight-sensitive
colloid,
exposed under astep
tablet.
"S"represents
the
support,
and "C" representsthe
exposedcolloid
layer
(the
amount ofinsolubility
being
shown as atint).
Figure
1
indicates
that
only
the
first
step
is
anchored
to
the
support,
wherethe
light
has
completely
penetrated.
In
the
remaining
stepsthere
is
still an underlying
stratum of solublecolloid,
varying
in
thickness
from
step
two
through
step
six.If
the
resist were nowFig.
1
Process
ofInsolubility
Fig.
2
Resist
Transferred
to
Image
Carrier
Pig.
3
13
the
last
five
patches unsupported except wherethey
areattached
to
oneanother.
Possibly
two
or more patchesmight
be
strong
enoughto
hold,
but
the
lighter patches,
for
example,
stepsfive
andsix,
woulddefinitely
detach.
Unfortunately,
stepsfive
and six represent a considerableportion of
the
image.
To
overcomethis
trouble,
it
is
necessary
to
use atemporary
support,
andto
squeegeethe
exposed resist ontothe
plate priorto
development.
This
stageis
diagrammed
in
Figure
2,
where "S" representsthe
originalsupport,
"C"represents
the
colloid and "P" representsthe
plate.Steps
two
through
six are now supported and will notbe
lost
in
4
development.
The
photopolymer processfor
Direct
Gravure
does
nothave
this
inherent
problembecause
no variable reliefstructure
is
formed.
The
exposure willtheoretically
proceed
to
the
floor
ofthe
support,
in
all areas struckby
light
(See
Figure
3).
One
ofthe
mostfavorable
aspects ofthe
gravureprocess
is
its
ability
to
print a variableink
film
thick
ness
by
virtue of celldepth
variation.Regrettably,
this
characteristic
has
been
sacrificedin
the
direct
system.This
sacrificehas
been
justified
by
the
advantagesinherent
in
the
direct
system,
such as ease of applicationworked on
modifying
the
etchantchemistry
in
an attemptto
15
CHAPTER
3
HYPOTHESIS
A
positive-working emulsion,
utilizing
iron
salts andgelatin
(or
other suitablecolloid),
canbe
directly
applied
to
a gravure cylinder or plate.Furthermore,
this
emulsion,
afterexposure,
will provide a reliefimage
whichwill
have
adiffusion
effect onthe
etchant and produce animage
ofvarying
celldepths.
In
this
case,
"positive-working"
refers
to
a reactionwhereby
aninsoluble
emulsionCHAPTER 4
BACKGROUND
THEORY
A
number
of photographicprinting
processes,
based
onthe
light
sensitivity
ofiron
salts,
have
been
developed
in
the
past.All
ofthese
systems arevirtually
obsolete,
due
to
the
development
of alternative processes which gainedwidespread adaption.
Photographic
iron
salt processesmay
5
be
classified asfollows:
(1)
Processes
in
whichthe
originalferric
salt or reducedferrous
salt reacts with another substanceto
produce a colored reaction.(2)
Processes
in
whichthe
ferrous
salt reducesanother metallic salt
to
produce a metallicimage.
(3)
Processes
based
onthe
ability
offerric
saltsto
render gelatin and other organic colloidsinsoluble.
The
ferric
salts of organic acids(oxalate,
tartrate,
citrate,
etc.)
are reducedto
ferrous
salts when exposedto
light.
Potassium
ferricyanide
is
also reducedto
ferro-cyanide
by
the
action oflight.
Although
ferrocyanides
aresensitive
to
light,
the
ferric
saltshave
a muchhigher
sensitivity.
Conversion
ofthe
saltfrom
the
ferric
to
the
ferrous
state,
in
mostcases,
is
accomplished withoutany
important
changein
color or appreciabledarkening.
Any
reagent
that
willdifferentiate
between
ferric
andferrous
17
formed
by
the
photochemical
reduction,
into
animage
whichis
easily
visible.
Figure
4
lists
some ofthe
reagentswhich
may
be
employedfor
this
purpose.Ferric
Salts
Ferrous
Salts
Potassium
Ferricyanide
Precipitate
ofPrussian
Blue
Potassium
Ferrocyanide
Precipitate
ofWhite
Precipitate
Prussian
Blue
Tannins,
Gallic
Acid
Bluish-Black
Precipitate
B-Naphthoquinonesul-
Brown Precipitate
phonic
Acid
Silver
Salts
Black
Precipitate
of
Reduced
Silver
Platinum,
Palladium
Black
Precipitate
Salts
ofReduced
Metal
Gelatine
,Gum
Arabic
,etc.
The
colloidis
rendered
insoluble
The
colloidis
rendered soluble
Fig.
4
Photosensitive
Iron
Salt
Systems
In
all cases wherethe
differentiating
reagentproduces a colored precipitate with
ferrous
salt,
the
reagent
may
be
mixed withthe
ferric
saltbefore
sensiexposure
to
light
andpartly
in
the
first
wash water(or
in
a common
solvent
ofthe
salts used).By
this
method,
the
tones
ofthe
photographic print arethe
reverse ofthe
tones
ofthe
transparency
used.If
the
differentiating
reagent
forms
animage
withthe
ferric
salt,
it
shouldbe
used
separately
as akind
ofdeveloper.
In
this
way,
the
tones
ofthe
photographic print arethe
same asthe
tones
of
the
transparency
used.A
large
number of processeshave
been
suggested which make use ofthe
ferrous
salt'sability
to
reduce various metallic salts(copper,
mercury,
gold,
7
uranium,
silver,
platinum,
etc.).A
very
peculiar anddifficult
to
explain phenomenonoccurs when a colloid
is
incorporated
in
the
sensitizer.After
exposure,
whenthe
printis
immersed
in
the
developer,
the
colloidfilm
dissolves
much soonerin
those
placesQ
exposed
by
the
light.
Dr.
Josef
Maria
Eder
ofVienna
has
determined
the
relative
sensitivity
of a number offerric
salts.He
found
that
a water solution of equal molecules offerric
chlorideand oxalic acid was
the
quickestto
decompose
underthe
action of
daylight.
He
measuredthe
photochemicaldecompo
sition
according
to
the
quantity
offerrous
saltformed
in
the
sametime,
underthe
samelight,
and atthe
sametemper
ature
(70
to
77F).
The
results ofthis
investigation
are19
1)
Ferric
Chloride
+Oxalic
Acid
100
2)
Ferric
Oxalate
89
3)
Ferric
Ammonium
Oxalate
80
4)
Ferric
Tartrate
80
5)
Ferric
Potassium Oxalate
78
6)
Ferric
Chloride
+Tartaric
Acid
25
7)
Ferric
Chloride
+Citric
Acid
19
8)
Ferric
Ammonium
Citrate
15
Fig.
5
Sensitivity
ofFerric
Salts
formed
within a certaintime,
in
a solution offerric
chloride and oxalic
acid,
is
given arating
of100.
Other
ferric
salt solutions are ratedfor
their
sensitivities ona relative scale
to
100.
The
figures
have
full
validity
only
for
solutionscontaining
from
oneto
five
percent ofthe
ferric
salt.With
anincreasing
concentration,
there
is,
in
general,
an
increasing
sensitivity
ofthe
solution.At
the
sametime,
there
is
also acorresponding
decrease
in
the
quantity
offerrous
saltformed
in
the
various solutions.This
also pertainsto
a supportthat
is
coated with aq
solution and
then
dried.
when
these
salts are exposedto
light,
consists ofl)
the
formation
of carbonic acid and2)
the
formation
of21
CHAPTER 5
LITERATURE
REVIEW
Radiation-sensitive
iron
salt processeshave
along
history.
Count
Bestuscheff
,Lord
High Chancellor
andlater
Field Marshal
ofRussia,
invented
in
1725,
something
he
called a
"tinctura
toneconervina."This
substance
supposedly
possessed some sort of medicinal properties.Bestuscheff
's original
directions
consisted ofthe
following:
(1)
heating
iron
sulphide,
sulphur,
andbichloride
ofmercury
(2)
collecting
the
iron
chlorideformed
andallowing
it
to
liquefy
(3)
dissolving
it
in
four
times
its
weight of alcoholThis
deep-yellow
solution was exposedto
sunlightin
hermetically
closedflasks
untilit
became
colorless.(Reduction
offerric
chlorideto
ferrous
chloride).It
wasalso observed
that
the
light-exposed/decolorized
solutionwould regain
its
yellow colorin
the
dark
or when exposedto
air.Bestuscheff
wasthus
the
first
to
discover the
light
sensitiveness of
iron
salts andto
observethe
reduction offerric
to
ferrous
salts.In
addition,
he
wasfirst
to
recognize a
light
reaction which afterawhile,
up
to
aIn
1831
the
Bavarian
born John
Wolfgang
Doebereiner
discovered
the
light-sensitivity
offerric
oxalate.He
observed
that,
in
sunlight
a solution offerric
oxalaterapidly
formed
many
bubbles
of carbonic acid.This
liquid
gradually
became
turbid
anddeposited,
underthe
constant generation ofgases,
smalllemon-yellow
crystals offerrous
oxalate.
Organic
ferric-salts,
(especially
citriciron
oxideand potassium
ferricyanide
)
, upon whichmany
obsolete photo graphicprinting
processes arebased,
werefirst
successfully
tried
by
Sir
John
Herschel
in
1842.
Herschel
observed and
described
the
light-sensitivity
of paperscoated with
f
erri-citrate, andhe
determined
its
photochemical
reductionto
the
ferro-salt.
He
showedthat
the
unexposed
ferric-salts
do
notturn
blue
with potassiumferricyanide,
but
turn
blue
whenthe
ferric-salt
is
exposed.He
alsofound
that
potassiumferrocyanide
givesby
this
12
method a positive print.
Iron
salt's greatcapacity
for
reaction with othersubstances was recognized
by
Herschel,
whodetermined
that
the
ferrous
saltformed
by
light,
liberates
metallicprecip
itates
from
solutions of precious metal salts(silver,
gold,
platinum,
etc.).That
is,
the
image
is
deposited
ofanother substance
from
that
reducedby
the
light,
by
asecondary
reaction.1^
23
the
so-called "argentotype"process of
1842,
whichin
1889
came
up
again
with
small
changes
in
England
asthe
"Kallitype"process.
This
process
involved
the
reductionof
silver.
A
similar
process
involving
the
reduction ofplatinum
was
invented
by
William
Willis
in
England
in
1873
and
is
based
onthe
use of a mixture offerric
oxalate withplatinum
salts,
preferably
with potassium platinouschloride.
^
The
different
reactivecapacities
offerric
andferrous
saltstoward
tannin,
gallicacid,
and soforth,
led
to
the
production ofthe
so-called"ink
picture"by
ferro-gallic
printing
processes,
creditedto
Poitevin
in
1859.
The
time
for printing
wasgreatly
reducedby
the
substitution of green ammonium
ferric-citrate
for
the
brown
salt
by
F.
Valenta
in
1897.
The
fact,
discovered
by
Garnier
Salmon,
that
ferricitrate
changesits
hygroscopic
properties
in
light
(1858)
met withlittle
application,
although
it
has
been
experimented withby
various
i
16
workers.
In
i860,
Poitevin
cameup
with a positive pigmentprocess,
which seemsto
have
been
immediately
forgotten
andwas never used
to
any
extent.This
methodis
based
uponthe
following
facts:
(1)
that
ferric
salts render gelatininsoluble
the
ferrous
condition,
whereuponthe
gelatin(where
light
actionhas
taken
place)
againbecomes
soluble
The
application ofthis
principleis
obvious.If
paperis
coated with a warm gelatin solution
to
which some suitablepigment
has
been
addedalong
withferric
salts,
andis
then
exposed
to
light
under a positivetransparency,
the
portions of
the
film
protectedby
the
lines
ofthe
design
will remain unchanged and
insoluble.
Those
portions ofthe
film
which are not so protected willbe
changedby
the
exposure
to
the
ferrous
state and regaintheir
solubility.Hence,
these
portionsmay
be
removedby
washing.Thus,
from
a positivetransparency
we get a positive gelatinrelief,
the
color of which varies withthe
pigment17
incorporated
in
the
gelatinfilm.
The
length
of exposure mustbe
learned
by
experienceand
is
based
onthe
sensitizing
solution used. Poitevin' ssensitizer was a solution of
Sesquichloride
ofIron
10
parts,
Tartaric
Acid
3
parts,
and water100
parts.For
this
mixturehe
suggested an exposurefrom
twelve
to
twenty
minutes
in
direct
sunlight.Thus,
ferric
saltsinsolubilize
gelatinin
the
absenceof
radiation,
but
whenexposed,
the
colloid againbecomes
soluble.
Colloids
also suggested are gum arabic,cellulose
19
glycollate, and sodiumcellulosehydroxyethane sulphonate.
25
coagulation
by
agitating vigorously
whilepouring
afine
stream ofthe
guminto
the
ferric
chloride solution.He
found
that
any
coagulum
dissolves
in
excessferric
chloride,
the
productis
then
used withoutfurther
addition of water.Hardening
action onthe
gelatinis
greatest at a pH of2.2.
Sensitivity
ofthis
methodis
four
times
lower
than
20
dichromated
gum.
A
common reason echoedby
several authorities asto
why
such processes never gainedfavor follows:
"These
processes
have
the
disadvantage
ofproducing
a negativefrom
anegative;
the
ferric
gelatin reactionis
not,
there
fore,
as useful asthe
corresponding
chromate gelatin21
reaction."
It
is,
ofcourse,
just
this
property
whichmay
makethis
process attractivefor
direct
gravure.Poitevin
alsodiscovered
a variation ofthis
idea.
Paper
coated with gelatin(without
apigment)
is
sensitizedin
a solution ofFerric
Chloride
10
parts,
Tartaric
Acid
3
parts,
and water100
parts.After
having
been
dried,
then
exposed under atransparency
to
the
action oflight,
it
is
22
an impression canbe
taken.
"Fotal"
printing,
or cyanotype gelatinprinting
wasinvented
in
1905
by
Adolf
Telkampf
andArthur
Traube.
It
is
based
onsqueegeeing
ordinary,
unwashed cyanotypes(blueprints)
on moist gelatinlayers,
making
it
possibleto
obtain with
greasy
printersink
severalimpressions,
in
which
the
original negativeblueprints
appear as positiveprints
in
black
lines
on a white ground.This
process was2
}
generally known
asthe
True-to-Scale
process. -JThe
only
present commercial application ofiron
saltsas a sensitizer
is
found
in
the
screen printindustry.
Presensitized
indirect
films
have
traditionally
used a safeiron-salt
sensitizing
system whereinthe
hardening
ofthe
emulsion
in
non-image areasinitiated
during
exposureis
completed
by
anoxidation-reduction reaction
in
adeveloper
27
SECTION
TWO
CHAPTER
6
VERIFY
THE
FERRIC
CONCEPT
The
first
goal wasto
establishthe
validity
ofthe
positive
working
ferric-gelatin
process.The
working
details
of Poitevin' s original pigment processfollow:
Any
hard
surfaced,
well sized paperis
coated with a20
percent solution of pigmented gelatin.(91
grainsto
the
ounce ofwater).
When
dry,
sensitizein
the
following
solution:
Ferric
Chloride
15
grainsCitric
Acid
15
grainsWater
1
ounceor
Ferric
Chloride
50
grainsTartaric
Acid
15
grainsWater
1
ounceFig.
6
Poitevin'
s
Original
Pigment
Process
Formula
Float
the
paper onthe
sensitizing
solution,
as29
expose
to
actinicradiation
under a positivetransparency.
The
length
ofexposure
mustbe
learned
by
experience;
from
twelve
to
twenty
minutes
in
direct
sunlightis
suggested.After
exposure,
washthe
printin
warm(not
hot)
waterfor
a
few
minutes.
Those
portions ofthe
film
which are struckby
radiation
willbe
soluble while portions protectedby
the
transparency density
will remaininsoluble.
Thus,
from
a positive original we will get a positive
print,
the
colorof which varies with
the
pigmentincorporated
in
the
25
gelatin
film.
It
seems reasonablethat
for
this
processto
be
mostadvantageous as a commercial gravure
resist,
the
sensitizershould
be
incorporated
into
the
gelatin priorto
coating.This
wouldhave
the
effect ofsimplifying
the
coating
procedure and save much
time.
Therefore,
the
originalformula
was modified asfollows:
91
grainsto
an ounce of water was given as a20%
gelatin solution.
Since
15.4323
grainsis
equalto
onegram,
then
91
grainsis
equalto
5.8968
grams.So
23.5872
grams of gelatin(bloom
150,
viscosity
38)
was soaked
in
4
ounces of cold waterfor
30
minutes.
After
the
gelatin wasthoroughly
swollen,
it
was
warmed over awater
bath
untilit
wasdispersed
in
the
waterit
absorbed.
A
suitable amount of pigment was addedto
the
gelatin
Catalog
Number
A
107)-
The
sole purpose ofthe
pigmentis
to
makethe
image
visible
afterdevelopment.
The
sensitizer
was
madeup
ofthe
following:
Ferric
Chloride
15
grainsCitric
Acid
15
grainsWater
1
ounceFig.
7
Modified
Formula
Prior
to
coating,
two
ounces ofthe
gelatin solutionwas mixed with .5 ounces of
the
sensitizer.The
coating
procedure was asfollows:
A
four-sided
frame
(8
x10
inches)
was constructed outof
wood.
The
substrateto
be
coated was placed on a sheetof glass of
the
samesize,
both
substrate and glassslightly
larger
than
the
frame.
The
frame
was placed ontothe
front
ofthe
substrate andthe
glass/substrate/ frame
composite was clamped
together
withbulldog
clips.The
emulsion,
whilewarm,
was pouredinto
the
"dish"
formed
by
the
edges ofthe
frame.
The
frame/substrate/glass
arrangement was placed
in
alevel
position untilthe
gelatinhad
31
substrate,
andthe
emulsion
was
allowedto
completely
dry.
This
drying
took
aslong
as12
hours,
but
couldbe
greatly
accelerated with
forced
hot
air(a
hair dryer
was used).Paper
was
found
to
be
unsuitablefor
use as a substratein
this
methodbecause
ofdimensional
stability
problems.Therefore,
avinyl
sheet material was used as a substrate(Kwik-Print
Stable
Base
Sheets,
distributed
by
Light
Impressions
Corporation,
Rochester,
New
York).
After
drying,
this
iron
salt radiation-sensitiveemulsion was exposed
to
direct
sunin
anordinary
contactframe.
A Kodak
22
step
tablet
was employed as atest
target.
The
exposuretime
was15
minutes,
after whichthe
emulsion was
developed
in
warm water(100F)
for
five
minutes.
This
same exact procedure wasfollowed
withthe
substitution
of otherferric
saltsfor
the
ferric
chloride.
The
ferric
saltstested
wereferric
ammoniumcitrate,
ferric
ammonium
oxalate,
andferric
oxalate.It
shouldbe
notedthat
ferric
oxalateis
avery
difficult
chemicalto
comeby.
At
the
presenttime
it
is
impossible
to
buy
any
ferric
whichdoes
not containquantities of
ferrous
oxalate mixedin
withthe
ferric
oxalate.
This
is
because
ferric
oxalateis
relatively
unstable and will convert
back
into
the
ferrous
state whenbe
stored andtransported
in
a stable and cool environment.No
companies
in
Rochester supply ferric
oxalate,
andthis
includes
Kodak.
The
ferric
oxalate which was usedin
this
experimentwas made as
described
in
the
appendix.Results
A
positive print wasthe
result ofthe
ferric
chlorideexperiment,
withthe
gelatinapparently
becoming
solublein
those
areas struckby
radiation.The
tone
range was ratherlimited,
however,
to
only
about4
steps.In
addition,
the
transitional
steps were noteven,
but
mottled andirregular.
This
did
establishthe
validity
ofthe
positiveworking
iron
salt concept.The
empirically
observed Theological
properties ofthe
emulsion mixture seemedto
be
compatible with
the
requirements of a commercial gravurecylinder
ring
coater.The
dry
time
ofthe
resist couldbe
accelerated
to
an acceptable range giventhe
proper environment.
The
speed ofthe
resist,
however,
seemed muchtoo
slow.
Also,
the
tone
range was muchtoo
short.As
previously
alluded,
the
long
tone
range ofdichromated
gelatin
is
the
characteristic which allowsfor
the
subtleand
long
tone
range of a conventional gravure print.If
the
iron
salt resistis
to
be
of valuefor gravure,
it
also33
The
otheriron
saltstested
did
notinsolubilize
the
CHAPTER
7
TEST
FOR SPEED ENHANCEMENT
Based
onDr.
Josef Maria Eder's
chart of relativesensitivity,
figure
5,
it
seemsthat
enhanced speed characteristics
mightbe
relatedto
the
presence of oxalic acid.To
test
this,
two
emulsions wereformulated,
onethe
common
"blue
print"emulsion,
and onein
which some oxalicacid was added.
Formula
#1
Ferric
Ammonium
Citrate
5
gramsPotassium
Ferricyanide
2
grams10%
Gelatin
Solution
1
ounce(Bl 150,
Vis
38)
Formula
#2
Ferric
Ammonium
Citrate
5
gramsPotassium
Ferricyanide
2
gramsOxalic
Acid
1
gram10%
Gelatin
Solution
1
ounce(Bl 150,
Vis
38)
Fig.
8
35
These
were coated on paper with a4
inch
polyfoambrush.
This
coating
method gave athin,
evenlayer
whichdried
rapidly
(15
minutes).
The
exposure was again madein
a
contact
printframe
to
direct
sun,
withthe
"printed
out"image
serving
to
help
determine
the
propertiming.
"When
ablueprinting
paper,
composed of aferric
salt and potassiumferricyanide
is
exposedto
actinicradiation,
the
blue
color appears and
the
colordensity
increases
with exposuretime.
But
if
exposureis
of sufficientmagnitude,
adecrease
of colordensity
(solarization)
is
observed.How
ever,
if
the
paperis
treated
with water afterexposure,
the
blue
coloris
intensified
andthe
solarizationdisappears,
andfurthermore,
the
colorbecomes
comparative-ly
stable."As
the
paperis
exposedbehind
atranspar
ency,
the
action ofthe
radiationthrough
the
transparent
portions
turns
the
paperblue.
For
properexposure,
it
is
necessary
to
expose untilthis
blue
becomes
"bronzed," atwhich point solarization
has
just
begun.
For
the
first
formula
the
exposure was completein
8
minutes.The
secondformula
exposure was completein
2
minutes.
It
therefore
seemed
that
oxalic aciddid
greatly
increase
the
speed.Subsequent
historical
research revealed otherworkers
in
the
field
also reportedthat
the
addition of oxalic acidwill extend
the
sensitivity
threshold
andincrease
the
27
Results
Both
types
ofemulsion
formulas
produced similarlooking
prints priorto
development,
but
the
oxalicrequired much
less
exposure.
Development
was executedin
warm water
(100F)
for
5
minutes at whichtime
the
image
became
abeautiful,
bright
blue.
The
contrasts ofthe
prints were quite
different,
withthe
oxalicformula
37
CHAPTER
8
TEST
FOR PHYSICAL
RELIEF CHARACTERISTICS
From
previous work withblue
printing,
it
is
known
that
iron
salts are capable of along
tone
range response.It
wouldbe
usefulto
determine
where onthe
exposure curveof
the
ferric/ferrous
reactionthe
insoluble/soluble
actionoccurs.
In
theory,
the
gelatin shouldbecome
solublein
those
areas wherethe
ferric
saltshave
been
convertedto
ferrous
salts.Potassium
ferricyanide
forms
ablue
precipitate with
the
ferrous
salts.Therefore,
if
somepotassium
ferricyanide
is
included
in
the
sensitizer,
then
a
blue
precipitate wouldform
during
exposure and shouldwash off with
the
soluble gelatinduring
development.
Thus,
the
tone
range priorto
development
onthe
"printed
out"
emulsion could
be
seen and correlatedto
the
corresponding
points ofinsolubility/solubility
afterdevelop
ment.
Formula
#1
Ferric
Chloride
Citric
Acid
Potassium Ferricyanide
%
Gelatin
Solution
(Bl
150,
Vis
38)
15
grains15
grains
5
grains
1
ounceFormula
#2
Ferric
Chloride
Oxalic
Acid
Potassium Ferricyanide
10%
Gelatin
Solution
(Bl
150,
Vis
38)
Fig.
9
Physical
Relief
Test
Formulations
15
grains15
grains
5
grains1
ounceThe
coating
wasdone
on paper with a4
inch
polyfoambrush.
Drying
and exposure procedures werethe
same asexecuted previously.
Again
the
printed outimage
servedto
help
determine
the
proper exposurelevel.
In
this
case,
the
oxalicformula
wasapproximately
twice
asfast
asthe
citric.
Prior
to
development,
prints ofboth
formulas
showed
very
similartone
ranges,
(exposure
adjustment
made39
"printed
in,"with
the
shadowsexhibiting
a"bronzed
reversal"
look
characteristic
to
exposedblue
prints.Both
prints weredeveloped
in
warm water(100F)
for
5
minutes,
at whichtime
development
was complete.Results
The
solarized region ofthe
tone
scaleintensified
back
to
adeep
blue,
as occurs with mostferric
blue
printprocesses on
development.
But
in
additionto
this,
in
the
deep
shadowsthe
emulsionbroke
away
from
the
substrate.Thus,
the
gelatininsoluble/soluble
action occurredonly
in
the
deep
shadows!Although
the
density
tone
range producedby
the
precipitate ofPrussian
Blue
was quitelong,
the
insoluble/soluble
tone
range was short and showedthe
samemottled appearance as exhibited
in
the
previously
reportedexperiment
(Chapter
6).
An
actual sample ofthis
test
is
*
Fig.
10
41
SECTION
THREE
CHAPTER
9
DISCUSSION
OF
RESULTS
Further
experiments
withformulas
using
ferric
chloride or
ferric
chloridein
combination with otherferric
salts gave similar results.The
insoluble/soluble
action
did
not occurin
allthe
areas ofthe
emulsion whereradiation converted
ferric
saltsto
ferrous
salts,
but
rather
this
insoluble/soluble
actiononly
occurredin
areassubjected
to
high
levels
of exposure.These
findings
indicated
that
the
insoluble/soluble
action occurs atthe
point of solarization.
Many
photographic systems exhibitthe
solarizationphenomena.
The
curverepresenting
developable
density
as afunction
of exposure will passthrough
a maximum.If
the
exposure
is
increased
beyond
that
which producesthe
maximum
density,
adecrease
in
developable
density
canoccur.
The
characteristic curve shownin
figure 11 is
derived
by
plotting
density
versusthe
logarithm
ofexposure.
The
curve
may
be
divided
into
four
regions,
atoe,
a straightline
portion,
ashoulder,
and a region of solarization.The
toe
portionis
defined
asthe
region of underexposure.43
increase
ofdensity
withexposure.
This
portionis
quiteextensive
in
the
curves
for
dichromated
gelatin of carbontissue.
The
shoulder representsthe
region ofoverexposure,
whereincreased
exposure producesrelatively
slightdensity
increases.
Beyond
the
shoulderlies
the
region of solarization
where anincrease
in
exposureactually
resultsin
adecrease
in
developed
density.
In
the
case of aferric
chloride gelatinemulsion,
in
the
region ofsolarization,
the
gelatinbecomes
soluble andbreaks
away
from
the
substrate."Different
photographic emulsionsvary
greatly
in
the
extentto
whichthey
exhibit solarization.The
solarization
curves of some emulsions even passthrough
aminimum,
and a second stage
is
reached where anincrease
in
exposureagain produces an
increase
in
density."
Figure
12
gives atypical
family
of characteristiccurves with
clearly
defined
solarizationfor
anordinary
black
and white silverhalide
film
atdifferent
times
of29
development.
The
actual mechanism which accountsfor
the
solarization
phenomena of silverhalides<