• No results found

Coding & Reimbursement. For the Ear, Nose, & Throat Practice

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Coding & Reimbursement. For the Ear, Nose, & Throat Practice"

Copied!
39
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Coding & Reimbursement

For the Ear, Nose, & Throat Practice

Sponsored by the New York County Medical Society

March 2007

Presented by

James A. McNally, CPC - Health Care Consultant Services

Claims processing standards and policy - 3

Medicare policy: how to access it, how to influence it - 3

Managed care and private carrier policy - 4

Basic coding concepts: An overview - 9

ICD diagnosis codes - 9

CPT procedure codes - 9

Modifiers: CPT & HCPCS - 10

Global surgery and modifiers - 11

(2)

Proper documentation - 15

Documenting Evaluation & Management (E/M) services - 16

Coding for Ear, Nose, & Throat - 23

Common Ear, Nose, & Throat services and their Payment and Policy Indicators - 23

Major NCCI policy issues in Ear, Nose, & Throat B 25

Appendix - 33

Template: Respiratory System Examination Requirements - 34

About the Speaker

James A. McNally, CPC, heads his own health care consulting firm specializing in third-party coding and insurance issues and has over 25 years of experience in the health care field. He served as Ombudsman and as Associate Director of the Division of Socio-Medical Economics at The Medical Society of the State of New York (MSSNY). Before that, he held varied positions in Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield's Medicare Division.

Mr. McNally has worked extensively in the health insurance field, handling many diverse issues including guiding physicians through third-party insurer review and audit actions, assisting them on coding and billing policy topics, advising on the implementation of electronic data formats for physicians, and addressing other medical practice concerns.

Mr. McNally works with a number of national, county and state specialty societies, and has developed and handles their third-party payer coding help programs. He can be reached at coding@mcnallymed.com or via his web site at www.mcnallymed.com

(3)

Copyright 8 2007 by The New York County Medical Society

The information in this booklet is general in nature and is intended for

educational purposes only. The New York County Medical Society disclaims any responsibility and/or liability arising from use or reliance upon this information for claims or adverse results in specific interactions with insurers.

Claims processing standards and policy

Putting together a claim properly is technically challenging. It must be done according to a special set of standards that exist for diagnosis coding, procedure coding, and many other aspects of the coding, billing and reimbursement

(4)

Most of these standards have been created by the government and private insurers, working together and using input from organized medicine through the national, state, county, and state specialty medical society structure. The

standards help to codify proper medical/surgical treatments, provide patients with access to quality medical care, and protect benefit dollars.

Standards exist for:

_ AMA CPT coding and related policy _ Full ICD & HCPCS Coding

_ NTIS Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) Abundling@ lists _ The concept of the Local Coverage Determination (LCD)

_ Documentation standards for medical record evaluation (the E&M Guidelines)

_ Use of all AMA/HCPCS Modifiers and other modifiers (We discuss these areas in detail later in this booklet.)

Medicare policy: How to access it, how to influence it

Medicare makes its claims processing policy readily available to physicians.

What the physician should do:

- Local Medicare carriers offer a range of policy resources: Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs), news briefs, bulletins, etc.).

- Physicians can also access national policy directives on the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website at:

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/home/medicare.asp

Medicare also makes it possible for the individual physician to influence policy development, through:

(5)

Managed care and private carrier policy

Unlike Medicare, many managed care organizations (MCOs) fail to, or are reluctant to, divulge their policy documents and/or fee schedules to panel physicians--either at the time of initial sign-on or upon the physician=s later request. While a number of lawsuits have been successful with this problem, incidents of insurers= ignoring, refusing, or providing only limited data are nevertheless increasing. And another problem: Even though standards do exist for coding, billing, and reimbursement, it is an unfortunate reality that third-party insurers have not universally adopted these standards--and are not required to adopt them under present law and/or regulations!

What the physician should do:

_ Physicians are strongly urged to make a good-faith effort to obtain all pertinent claims processing guidelines from every managed care carrier they may be thinking of participating with, or are already participating with. _ Many physician requests for policy go unanswered, or are denied (with the carrier citing unsubstantiated Aproprietary information@ concerns). But it is essential that you make the effort to obtain this information. That way, you get Aon the record@ as having requested it.

_ You should document your requests via Certified Return Receipt in order to protect yourself Adown the road,@ in case a carrier later makes a

retroactive refund demand on claims that it has already paid. _ You may want to use the following sample letter to request policy:

Sample letter: Request for policy

Dear (name of contact at carrier):

Open discussion of claims and payment policy can go far to improve cooperation and mutual understanding between physicians and managed care plans. Administrative disputes can be minimized and more resources can be devoted to efficient, highBquality care.

In accordance, I am hereby respectfully requesting that you provide me, on a timely basis, with all pertinent policy documents for services rendered by this office as a participant with your organization.

Please forward claims processing and reimbursement policy for the following: Please see attached for specific services

Please send all policy related to (particular specialty). Thank you. Cc: (All appropriate regulatory agencies)

(6)

Managed care organization (MCO) policy websites

Recently, some of the major managed care and private carriers have been making an effort to improve their websites in order to ease physician

communications and make their policies more Atransparent." Some of these MCO actions have been voluntary; others have been court-ordered, as the result of litigation. It=s a first step in the long process of informing panel physicians about proper claim and coding processes. More is needed: carriers should make more detailed information available to participating (and even

nonparticipating) physicians. Negotiations on this issue are ongoing.

Physicians who are participants with some of the major MCO panels can access these MCOs= websites, registering and signing on via a User Name and

Password that the MCO assigns. This user-specific sign-in process enables you to see specific claim and patient information that is unique to your practice. Following are some of the MCO websites (this is not an all-inclusive list):

Oxford Health Plans https://www.oxhp.com/

Aetna

https://www.aetna.com/provider/

Note: The Aetna Coverage Policy Bulletins are accessible to all via the following link for Coverage Policy Bulletins:

http://www.aetna.com/cpb/cpb_menu.html

Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield

http://www.empireblue.com/index.php

Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield also has a participating physician registration and sign-in process to access physician specific claims and patient eligibility

(7)

Anyone can access a number of resources on the Empire site, at: Physician Sourcebook http://www.empireblue.com/physicians/sourcebook/index.php Medical Policies http://www.empireblue.com/physicians/policies/medical_policies.php Newsletters http://www.empireblue.com/physicians/home/newsletters/index.php CIGNA http://www.cigna.com/health/provider/medical/procedural/coverage_positions/me dical/index.html#P GHI http://www.ghi.com/providers/medical/pr_med_manual.html HIP http://www.hipusa.com/ United Healthcare https://www.unitedhealthcareonline.com/NASApp/uhg/frameIndex.html

(8)

Obtaining fee schedules What the physician should do:

_ It is in the physician=s best interest to be proactive and Aget on the record@ by sending the following letters to the carriers the physician participates with.

_ All communications mentioned or shown here should be sent Certified Return Receipt. This is so you have a formal record. Communications should also be safeguarded in the event that you need to

demonstrate a Agood faith effort,@ if a carrier comes back to you after the fact demanding an arbitrary refund.

Sample letter: Request for fee schedules

Dear (name of contact at carrier):

Open discussion of fee schedules and payment policy can go far to improve cooperation and mutual understanding between physicians and managed care plans. Administrative disputes can be minimized and more resources can be devoted to efficient, highBquality care.

As you know, the New York State Department of Health has recently ruled that plan disclosure of fee schedules is mandatory. Per New York State Public Health Law Section 4406Bc (5a): "Contracts entered into between a plan and a health care Physician shall include terms which prescribe (a) the method by which payments to a Physician, including any prospective or retrospective adjustments thereto, shall be calculated . . . And (b) a description of the . . . information relied upon to calculate any such payments and adjustments . . ."

In accordance, I am hereby respectfully requesting that you provide me, on a timely basis, with fee schedule data for services rendered by this office as a participant with your organization. Please forward fee schedule data for the following:

Please see attached for specific codes.

Please send all procedure codes related to (particular specialty).

In addition, please be advised that my agreement with your organization satisfies all confidentiality concerns. Thank you.

Cc: County/State/Specialty Medical Society All appropriate regulatory agencies

(9)

If the carrier does not send the requested fee schedules, you are urged to send the following to the appropriate regulatory agency to register a complaint.

Sample letter: Complaint letter to regulatory agency

(Date)

(CONTACT INFORMATION)

I am writing at the recommendation of my professional medical society with regard to an ongoing problem issue your office is familiar with.

I had requested in a letter dated (Date of Original Request) that (Name of Insurance Carrier/Managed Care Plan) provide me with fee schedule data for services rendered by this office under my rights as a participant. They have:

(CHOOSE THE APPROPRIATE PARAGRAPH)

Not responded to my original request as of this date.

Provided me only with what they consider to be the most common procedures codes for my specialty even though that is not what the law states.

Stated that they would not provide me with the fee schedule as they consider it proprietary information.

As a result, I am seeking your office=s assistance in an effort to investigate this violation of the law and require them to provide with this information. Your prompt attention to this request will be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

(10)

Basic coding concepts: An overview

ICD-9 diagnosis codes

The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), is a clinical modification of the World Health Organization=s (WHO) classification of morbidity and mortality (ICD-9). ICD-9-CM is published as a three-volume set: Volume 1 (Disease: Tabular list), Volume 2 (Disease:

Alphabetic Index), and Volume 3 (Procedures: Alpha and Tabular). The ICD-9 codes are used to describe your patient=s condition using the most specific diagnosis, symptom, problem or complaint, by indicating the chief diagnosis per service billed. When selecting an ICD-9-CM code, be sure to:

_ Select the highest level of specificity. Claims submitted with 3- or 4-digit codes where 4- or 5-digit codes are available will be rejected as truncated. _ Be aware of the importance of proper ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding and

policy directives. Access the available Covered Indications listings at the carrier level.

Resource: ICD Coding Manual

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ICD9ProviderDiagnosticCodes/04_addendum.asp#TopO fPage

CPT procedure codes

The CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) system is anumeric coding system that describes the services and procedures provided by physicians. CPT codes are compiled by the American Medical Association. CPT has six sections: Evaluation and Management, Medicine, Anesthesia, Surgery, Radiology, and Pathology and Laboratory.

How CPT is used in Medicare billing

For medical billing, Medicare mandates that CPT codes be used to describe the services/procedures performed. The CPT codes are entered in field (Item) 24d of the CMS-1500 paper claim form, or in the appropriate data field on electronic billing software.

(11)

Modifiers: CPT & HCPCS

Modifiers are two-position alpha, numeric, or alphanumeric codes that physicians can add, as suffixes, to procedure codes. Physicians use modifiers to indicate that a service or procedure that has been performed has been altered by some specific circumstance, but has not changed in its definition or code.

Modifiers may be used to indicate that:

_ A service or procedure has both a professional and technical component

_ A service or procedure was performed by more than one physician _ A service or procedure has been increased or reduced

_ Only part of a service was performed _ An adjunctive service was performed _ Unusual events occurred

The CPT modifiers are numeric modifiers devised by the AMA. The HCPCS modifiers are alpha or alphanumeric modifiers, devised by the federal

government or local carriers to meet temporary needs.

Common CPT modifiers

22 - Unusual procedural service: Surgeries for which the services performed are significantly greater than those usually required, may be billed with the A22@ modifier. Be sure to include a concise statement about how the service differs from the usual service, plus an operative report.

24 - Unrelated evaluation & management service: During the post-operative period, the same physician has provided an unrelated cognitive, or evaluation and management (E/M), service.

25 - Significant, separately identifiable evaluation & management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service (0-10 day procedure): A separate diagnosis is not needed. (See Global Surgery, page 11.)

26 - Professional component: Certain procedures are a combination of a physician or professional component (such as the interpretation of an X-ray or test) and a technical component (such as the taking of the X-ray). When the physician component is reported separately, adding Modifier 26 to the usual procedure code helps identify the service.

59 - Distinct procedural service: The physician may need to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or separate from other services performed on

(12)

the same day. Modifier 59 may be used to show that there was a different session or patient encounter, a different procedure or surgery, a different site, a separate lesion, or a separate injury. This modifier is used to Aunbundled@ one service from another (see ABundling,@ page 12).

Common HCPCS modifiers

GA B The physician has a Awaiver of liability@ statement on file.

RT (Right side) - Use to identify procedures performed on the right side of the body.

TC - Technical component: Under certain circumstances, a charge may be made for the technical component of a diagnostic test only. Adding modifier TC to the usual procedure number indicates that this is solely a technical component charge.

Complete listings of all modifiers are on the Medicare carrier web site at:

http://www.empiremedicare.com/partbny/1500/modifiers.htm#HCPCS%20M ODIFIERS

Global surgery and modifiers

Global surgery & medical care and surgery on the same day, or in the postoperative period of a surgical procedure

Many practices specializing in Ear, Nose, & Throat do surgeries and medical care on the same day, or medical care in the postoperative period of a given surgery. It is essential to know how to submit these services so that all medically necessary services are allowed.

Remember this important principle: All medical care associated with a

surgical procedure is considered part of the global surgical package, and is calculated in the payment made for the surgery itself.

There are occasions when medical care on the same day (or in the postoperative period of a surgical procedure) can be allowedCif you use the applicable

modifier. Usually, a separate and distinct diagnosis is required. (Note: Medicare does not require a separate diagnosis, but many managed care and private insurers do).

(13)

What the physician should do:

The physician should know the proper use of the following appropriate modifiers:

_ 24 - Unrelated evaluation and management service by the same physician during the postoperative period.

_ 25 - Significant separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the day of the procedure.

If another surgery is required in the post-operative period of an initial surgical procedure, the following modifiers are appropriate:

_ 78 - Return trip to the operating room for a related procedure during a postoperative period.

_ 79 - Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during a post-operative period.

A

Bundling

@

and the National Correct Coding Initiative

(NCCI)

One of the major problems in billing for a medical practice is Abundling.@ ABundling@ has to do with services performed on the same day.

Each carrier has its own unique list that contains certain combinations of these same-day services, chosen by that carrier. For each combination on the list, the carrier states that one of the codes in the combination will be allowed, but the other code will be lumped or Abundled@ in with the first code.

Payment for the second code (the Abundled@ code) will be reduced or denied altogether.

CMS itself has a set of policy statements known as the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI), which is built around CMS= own Abundling@ list (the CCI list). The CCI list states incorrect and inappropriate coding combinations for services performed on the same day.

The CCI list contains two main types of code combinations:

_ Comprehensive/Component code combinations, in which the

Acomprehensive@ code will be paid and the Acomponent@ code disallowed. _ Mutually Exclusive codes or codes, representing services that cannot

(14)

Modifier 59 and the Correct Coding Initiative (Subscript 1 Procedures)

In the CPT system, it may be appropriate and necessary to use a modifier to indicate that two distinct or independent services were in fact performed. (The physician does know how to code appropriatelyCthe two codes weren=t included on the same claim form just through an error.)

Modifier 59 is the modifier most frequently used to attest to distinct services performed on the same date. Modifier 59should be used to identify

procedures/services that are not normally reported together, but are

appropriate under certain circumstances. In the hard-copy version of the CCI Bundling Lists, these services are shown with a subscript A1@ above the code. The online version has a column indicating whether a modifier is permissible. Modifier 59 may be used to signal a different session or patient encounter, a different procedure or surgery, a different site or organ system, or a separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries)--not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same physician. Modifier 59 should be appended to the secondary, additional, or lesser procedures(s) or service(s). Note: The patient=s medical record must reflect that the modifier is being used appropriately to describe separate services. You must be able to justify the unbundling. Also note: Modifier 59 should be used only if no other modifier is appropriate.

In closing, it is important to note that numerous third party insurers do not use the CCI bundling code lists. Instead, these insurers rely on commercially available Aproprietary@ software packages that have been developed without the input of organized medicine. This problem is being addressed in a number of venues, most notably the courts and the legislature.

What the physician should do:

_ The Medicare CCI edit tables are updated quarterly. Physicians should be aware of these edit tables and have their support staff access them on a regular basis. The tables can be downloaded free of charge from the CMS website at:

CCI Coding Manual

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/physicians/cciedits/nccmanual.asp CCI Edit Lists

(15)

_ Physicians should see whether any of the services they commonly perform are listed as Subscript 1 procedures. They should use Modifier 59 accordingly.

_ Physicians should also see whether they perform any services that cannot be properly unbundled with Modifier 59. Knowing about these services in advance will preclude time-consuming, expensive, and ultimately fruitless appeal requests. Example Column 1 Column 2 * = In existence prior to 1996 Effective Date Deletion Date*= no data Modifier0= not allowed1= allowed9= not applicable 31231 30901 19970401 * 1 31231 30903 19970401 * 1

31231 - Nasal endoscopy, diagnostic, unilateral or bilateral (separate procedure) 30901 - Control nasal hemorrhage, anterior, simple (limited cautery and/or packing)

(16)

Proper documentation

If you send in a claim, you must be ready to stand by it. The insurer needs evidence that the services you provided are consistent with the claim and the reimbursement. At the time of the encounter or soon after, key details must be entered in the patient=s chart: the diagnosis, the exact services provided, the site of service--and more.

A properly documented medical record is also important for the patient=s care. It helps the physician plan the patient=s immediate treatment, and monitor the patient=s care over time. It helps the physician communicate with other healthcare professionals. And it helps professionals collect data that may be useful for research and education.

The chart chronologically documents the care of the patient. Detailed and accurate notations must be made of pertinent facts, findings, and observations about an individual=s health history, including past and present illnesses, examinations, tests, treatments, and outcomes.

Chart format and legal safeguards

The medical record should be complete and legible. Nothing should be erased. If anyone makes a change, that change should be dated the day the change is made, not the day the service was provided. The confidentiality of the medical record should be fully maintained, per the requirements of medical ethics and law.

Chart content

For each encounter, the record should show the date, plus the verifiable, legible identity (name) of the healthcare professional that provided the service. The record should also include:

_ The diagnosis or condition that matches the ICD-9 coding on the claim, and the services that matches the CPT-4 coding on the claim

_ The chief complaint and/or reason for the encounter

_ Relevant history, plus patient=s progress, responses to treatment and changes in treatment

(17)

_ Appropriate risk factors

_ Assessment, clinical impression or diagnosis, including past and present diagnoses and conditions

_ Plan for care, including follow-up care and instructions

In addition, if the rationale for ordering diagnostic and other ancillary services is not specifically documented, this rationale should be easy to infer.

Documenting Evaluation and Management (E/M)

services

Cognitive (Athinking@) services, also known as Evaluation and Management (E/M) services, are crucial to medical care and are a major documentation challenge. E/M services include office visits, consultations, hospital visits and home visits. (You=ll find a chart showing the most common E/M codes on pages 18, 19 and 22.)

An E/M service can be relatively simple or complex, depending on how sick the patient is, how many different organ systems are involved, and many other factors. For that reason, the CPT system allows you to code E/M services at five levels, from the least complex (Level 1) to the most complex (Level 5). You just have to be able to justify your choice of level via the documentation in the chart. CMS has put out special E/M Documentation Guidelines to help physicians and their staffs choose appropriate E/M codes. Reviewing these guidelines will be an important part of your education. The E/M Documentation Guidelines are

available on the CMS web site at:

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedlearnProducts/20_DocGuide.asp

The Evaluation and Management codes are broken down by level of service. For each level, there are specific requirements regarding what you must document in the patient=s chart, if you are going to assign that code level to the service

performed.

This is where the physician and their coding and billing staff must work together very closely. The chart drives the choice of E/M code--and not vice versa!

(18)

The CPT code descriptors for the levels of E/M services recognize seven components of these services:

_ History

_ Examination (e.g., see Respiratory System Examination Requirements template, page 34)

_ Medical decision-making _ Counseling

_ Coordination of care

_ Nature of presenting problem _ Time

When you choose an E/M service level, remember that the first three of these components (history, examination and medical decision-making) should be the key to your decision. For new patients and initial consults, all three of those components must be met; for existing patients and subsequent consults, two of the three components must be met. (The CPT codes give a full description of these requirements.)

Note that the level of E/M service is dependent on not just one component, but two or three. Therefore, even if you choose Level 5 for one component (say, the examination component), that doesn=t necessarily mean that the other

components (history and medical decision-making) were also Level 5.

Level of Medical Decision-Making (LMDM) Chart B Point System

Note: Keep in mind that choosing a level for medical decision-making is

extremely subjective. It is very rare that an insurer, public or private, will base any audit activity solely on the lack of a Aproper@ level of decision-making.

Lev el Decision # of DX's/Mgt Options Amt/Complexity of Data Risk of Complications

1&2 Straightforward Minimal (1)

Minimal or none

(1) Minimal (1)

3 Low Complexity Limited (2) Limited (2) Low (2)

4

Moderate

Complexity Multiple (3) Moderate (3) Moderate (3)

5

High

Complexity

Extensive

(19)

What constitutes an Ainitial office visit or exam@? For that matter, what constitutes a Anew patient@? A Anew patient@ is defined as one who has not received any professional services from the physician within the previous three years. (Note: What if several physicians are practicing in a multi-specialty practice and this patient saw one of the other physicians in the practice? The patient may still be viewed as a new patient if that other physician was of a different specialty.)

(20)

Initial Office Visits

E/M Codes B Initial Office Visits - Requires all three Key Components to be at the same level Code Components 99201 99202 99203 99204 99205 Nature of Problem Self-limited or Minor Severity Low to Moderate Severity Moderate Severity Moderate to High Severity Moderate to High Severity History Problem Focused CCBrief HPI(1-3 elements) No ROS No PFSH Expanded ProblemFocus ed CCBrief HPI(1-3 elements) Problempertin ent ROS (1 system) No PFSH Detailed CCExtended HPl (4+ elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Extended ROS (2-9 systems) Problem Pertinent PFSH(1 element) Complete CCExtended HPI (4+ elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Complete ROS (10+ systems) Complete PFSH (3/3 elements) Complete CCExtended HPI (4+ elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Complete ROS (10+ systems) Complete PFSH (3/3 elements) Examination Problem Focused 1-6 elements ExpandedProb lemFocused At least 6 elements Detailed At least 9 elements Complete 14 elementsRequi res Mental Status Assessment Complete 14 elementsRequ ires Mental Status Assessment LMDM* Straightforward < 1 Diagnosis or Management Options < 1 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk Minimal Straightforwar d < 1 Diagnosis or ManagementO ptions < 1 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk = Minimal Low Complex 2 Diagnoses or Management Options 2 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk = Low ModerateCom plex 3 Diagnoses or Management Options 3 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk = Moderate High Complex > 4 Diagnoses or Management Options > 4 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk High

(21)

Established Patient Office Visits

E/M Codes B Office Visit B Established Patient B Requires 2 of 3 Key Components to be at same level

Code 99211 99212 99213 99214 99215 Nature of Presenting Problem Minimal Severity Self-limited or Minor Severity Low toModerateSe verity Moderate toHighSeverity Moderate to High Severity History Evaluation and Management Code does not require the presence of a physician Problem Focused CC Brief HPI(1-3 elements) No ROS No PFSH ExpandedProb lemFocused CC Brief HPI (1-3 elements) Problem Pertinent ROS (1 system) No PFSH Detailed CC Extended HPI (4+ elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Extended ROS (2-9 systems)Proble mPertinentPFS H (1element) Comprehensive CC Extended HPI (4 = elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Complete ROS (10+ systems) Complete PFSH (2/3 elements) Exam Problem Focused 1-5 elements ExpandedProb lemFocused At least 6 elements Detailed At least 9 elements Comprehensive 14 elements Requires Mental Status Assessment LMDM* Straightforwar d <1 Diagnosis or ManagementO ptions <1 Amount of Data Risk Minimal Low Complex 2 Diagnoses orManagement Options 2 Amount of Data Risk Low Moderate Complex 3 Diagnoses or ManagementO ptions 3 Amount of Data Risk Moderate High Complex >4 Diagnoses orManagementOp tions >4 Amount of Data Risk = High

* Numbers refer to points from Medical Decision Making Chart (page 17).

Consultation coding

A consultation is a referral by one physician to another physician, normally a specialist in a different field, who will provide advice or a treatment plan. Medicare will reimburse the consulting physician for the following services:

(22)

_ Taking the patient=s history _ Examining the patient

_ Initiating diagnostic and/or therapeutic services

_ Preparing a written report that contains a diagnosis and becomes part of the patient=s permanent medical record

Any time a physician performs a service for a patient at the request of another physician, the requesting physician=s name and Unique Physician Identification Number (UPIN) must be indicated in blocks 17 and 17a of the CMS-1500 claim form or the appropriate electronic equivalent.

If the consultant subsequently assumes responsibility for management of a portion or all of the patient=s condition(s), this consultant should use the E/M codes describing initial or subsequent visits, depending on the type of encounter (first time seen, etc.).

New Medicare rules on consultations: CMS has substantially revised the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, and has released a communication known as a ATransmittal,@ that lists the correct new CPT codes for consultations.

The AMA CPT codes 99261 - 99263 (hospital inpatient follow-up consultations) and codes 99271 - 99275 (confirmatory consultations) were deleted, beginning 2006.

Policy for consultations has been clarified with regard to the definition of

Aconsultation,@ documentation requirements, when and by whom a consultation may be performed/reported, how to deal with a split/shared evaluation and management service, and nonphysician practitioners.

New rules for confirmatory consultation (Asecond opinion@): The 2006 Confirmatory Consultation codes have been deleted. (Those codes were used primarily for patient-initiated or "second opinion" consultations.) Now, the proper way to code a second opinion (or patient-initiated consultation or request)

depends on who requested the encounter.

The patient, a family member or an insurer is no longer an appropriate source for a consultation request. Now, appropriate sources include a physician, counselor, nurse or nurse practitioner.

To determine the appropriate code, you must ensure that the consultation requirements are met. You should report a regular consult code if the visit meets the three requirements for a consultation: (1) appropriate source of the request for opinion, (2) rendering of services and (3) report to the requester.

(23)

the three requirements have not been met. Therefore, instead of a consult, you must submit an office visit for the evaluation and management of a new or established patient. And since this would most likely be the first time you encounter this patient, it would be an Ainitial visit,@ depending on the place of service.

Regarding private or managed care organizations consult policy: check with each carrier to determine its payment policy.

To view the full CMS communication, go to:

(24)

Consultations

E/M Codes B Consultations B Office - Requires all 3 Key Components to be at the same level Code Components 99241 99242 99243 99244 99245 Nature of Problem Self-limited or Minor Severity Low to Moderate Severity Moderate Severity Moderate to High Severity Moderate to High Severity History Problem Focused CCBrief HPI(1-3 elements) No ROS No PFSH Expanded ProblemFocus ed CCBrief HPI(1-3 elements) Problempertin ent ROS (1 system) No PFSH Detailed CCExtended HPl (4+ elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Extended ROS (2-9 systems) Problem Pertinent PFSH(1 element) Complete CCExtended HPI (4+ elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Complete ROS (10+ systems) Complete PFSH (3/3 elements) Complete CCExtended HPI (4+ elements or status of at least 3 chronic or inactive conditions) Complete ROS (10+ systems) Complete PFSH (3/3 elements) Examination Problem Focused 1-6 elements ExpandedProb lemFocused At least 6 elements Detailed At least 9 elements Complete 14 elementsRequi res Mental Status Assessment Complete 14 elementsRequ ires Mental Status Assessment LMDM* Straightforward < 1 Diagnosis or Management Options < 1 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk Minimal Straightforwar d < 1 Diagnosis or ManagementO ptions < 1 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk = Minimal Low Complex 2 Diagnoses or Management Options 2 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk = Low ModerateCom plex 3 Diagnoses or Management Options 3 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk = Moderate High Complex > 4 Diagnoses or Management Options > 4 Amount and Complexity Of Data Risk High

(25)

Coding for Ear, Nose, & Throat

Your Medicare carrier=s website shows the full policy for key coding and billing issues, expressed in the Local Coverage Determination (LCD) format. You will find policy for:

_ Indication and Limitations of Coverage and/or Medical Necessity _ CPT/HCPCS Codes

_ ICD-9 Codes That Support Medical Necessity _ Documentation Requirements

_ Utilization Guidelines (if available) _ Sources of Information

_ Revision History _ Coding Guidelines

To review key sections of the policies below, please see the section titled APolicy Addendum,@ in this booklet=s Appendix (page 34).

Common Ear, Nose, & Throat Services and their Payment and

Policy Indicators

Many times, physicians will require information on a particular code and its payment and policy guidelines.

A full listing of pertinent policy guidelines is contained in the National Physician Fee Schedule Relative Value File.The file contains the associated relative value units used in calculating the Medicare payment, a fee schedule status indicator used in determining if a service is covered, and various payment policy indicators for more than 10,000 physician services.

In addition to the above, it includes information on global or post-op periods, payment of assistant at surgery, team surgery, bilateral surgery, supervision requirements, and more.

The drawback to this file is that it is large and requires Unzip software to access it.

As a result, CMS has provided a quicker way to get this information. Go to the web site below and follow the instructions.

(26)

For example, when you type in code 31231 and request payment indicators, this grid appears and tells you, among other items, that the Global period for this surgery is 0 days, an the Asst Surg value of 1 means an assistant at surgery may not be paid for this code.

HCP C Modifie r Short Description Pro c Sta t PCT C Glob al Ass t Sur g Bilt Sur g Mul t Sur g Co Sur g Tea m Surg Phy s Sup v Diag Imagin g Family Ind 3123 1 Nasal endoscopy, dx A 0 000 1 2 2 0 0 09 99

It should be noted that, while this is a Medicare-specific file with payment and policy data unique to the federal program, many third party insurers use Medicare policy as an unofficial or sometimes official guide.

The above function gives you data on a specific procedure code. To find the claims processing policy regarding common Ear, Nose, & Throat services of a specific Medicare carrier such as National Government Services - Empire Medicare Services in New York, you may want to look at the following websites (this is not an all-inclusive list):

Respiratory Therapy Services

http://www.empiremedicare.com/newypolicy/policy/l18652_final.htm Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy

http://www.empiremedicare.com/newypolicy/policy/l3474_final.htm Swallow Evaluation B Dysphagia

http://www.empiremedicare.com/newypolicy/policy/l7761_final.htm Transtelephonic Spirometry

http://www.empiremedicare.com/newypolicy/policy/l20450_final.htm Allergan Immunotherapy

http://www.empiremedicare.com/newypolicy/policy/l3027_final.htm

Medically Necessary Removal of Impacted Cerumen Requiring a Physician=s Skill

(27)

Major NCCI policy issues in Ear, Nose, & Throat

The following are basic rules for Ear, Nose, & Throat Correct Coding (CCI) policy, to include the Respiratory and Ear Systems.

Surgery: Respiratory, Cardiovascular, Hemic and Lymphatic Systems CPT Codes 30000 - 39999

A. Introduction

The general guidelines regarding correct coding apply to the CPT codes in the range of 30000-39999. Specific issues unique to this section of the CPT Manual are clarified in the following guidelines.

B. Evaluation and Management (E/M) Services

Medicare Global Surgery Rules define the rules for reporting evaluation and management (E/M) services with procedures covered by these rules. This section summarizes some of the rules.

All procedures on the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule are assigned a Global period of 000, 010, 090, XXX, YYY, or ZZZ. The global concept does not apply to XXX procedures. The global period for YYY procedures is defined by the Carrier. All procedures with a global period of ZZZ are related to another procedure, and the applicable global period for the ZZZ code is determined by the related procedure.

Since NCCI edits are applied to same-day services rendered by the same provider to the same beneficiary, certain Global Surgery Rules are applicable to NCCI. An E/M service is separately reportable on the same date of service as a procedure with a global period of 000, 010, or 090 under limited circumstances. If a procedure has a global period of 090 days, it is defined as a major surgical procedure. If an E/M service is performed on the same date of service as a major surgical procedure for the purpose of deciding whether to perform this surgical procedure, the E/M service is separately reportable with modifier -57. Other E/M services on the same date of service as a major surgical procedure are included in the global payment for the procedure and are not separately reportable. NCCI does not contain edits based on this rule because Medicare Carriers have separate edits.

(28)

If a procedure has a global period of 000 or 010 days, it is defined as a minor surgical procedure. The decision to perform a minor surgical procedure is included in the payment for the minor surgical procedure, and should not be reported separately as an

E/M service. However, a significant and separately identifiable E/M service unrelated to the decision to perform the minor surgical procedure is separately reportable with modifier -25. NCCI does contain some edits based on these principles, but the Medicare Carriers have separate edits. Neither the NCCI nor the Carriers have all possible edits based on these principles.

Procedures with a global surgery indicator of AXXX@ are not covered by these rules. Many of these AXXX@ procedures are performed by physicians and have inherent pre-procedure, intra-procedure, and post-procedure work that is usually performed each time the procedure is completed. This work should never be reported as a separate E/M code. Other AXXX@ procedures are not usually performed by a physician and have no physician work relative value units

associated with them. A physician should never report a separate E/M code with these procedures for the supervision of others performing the procedure or for the interpretation of the procedure. With most AXXX@ procedures, the physician may, however, perform a significant and separately identifiable E/M service on the same day of service, which may be reported by appending modifier B25 to the E/M code. This E/M service may be related to the same diagnosis that requires the performance of the AXXX@ procedure, but it cannot include (1) any work inherent in the AXXX@ procedure, (2) supervision of others performing the AXXX@ procedure, or (3) time for interpreting the result of the AXXX@ procedure. Appending modifier B25 to a significant, separately identifiable E/M service when performed on the same date of service as an AXXX@ procedure is correct coding. C. Respiratory System

1. Because the upper airway is bordered by a mucocutaneous margin, several CPT codes may define services involving biopsy, destruction, excision, removal, revision, etc., of lesions of this margin, specifically the nasal and oral surfaces. When billing a CPT code for these services, only one CPT code which most accurately describes the service performed should be coded, generally either from the CPT section describing integumentary services (CPT codes 10040-19499) or respiratory services (CPT codes 30000-32999). When the narrative accompanying the CPT codes from the respiratory system section includes tissue transfer (grafts, flaps, etc.), individual tissue transfer/graft/flap codes (e.g., CPT codes 14000-15770) are not to be separately coded.

2. In keeping with the general guidelines previously promulgated, when a biopsy of an established lesion of the respiratory system is obtained as part of an

excision, destruction, or other type of removal (either endoscopically or surgically) at the same session, a biopsy code is not to be reported by the

(29)

a different area. As noted previously, in the circumstance where the decision to perform the more comprehensive procedure (excision, destruction, or other type of removal) is dependent on the results of the biopsy, the procedure may be separately reported. If, at the same session, a biopsy is necessary to establish the need for surgery, modifier -58 would be used to indicate this.

Example: If a patient presents with nasal obstruction, sinus obstruction and multiple nasal polyps, it may be reasonable to perform a biopsy prior to, or in conjunction with, polypectomy and ethmoidectomy. In this situation a separate code (e.g., CPT code 31237 for nasal/sinus endoscopy) is not to be reported with the column onenasal/sinus endoscopy code (e.g., CPT code 31255) (even

though the latter code does not specifically list a biopsy in its CPT narrative), because the biopsy tissue is procured as part of the surgery, not to establish the need for surgery.

3. When a diagnostic endoscopy of the respiratory system is performed, it is routine to evaluate the access regions as part of the medically necessary service; a separate service for this evaluation is not to be reported. For example, if an anterior ethmoidectomy is endoscopically performed, it is inappropriate to bill a diagnostic nasal endoscopy simply because the approach to the sinus was transnasal. As another example, fiberoptic bronchoscopy services routinely involve a limited inspection of the nasal cavity, the pharynx and the larynx; only the bronchoscopic code is reported, not with the nasal endoscopy, laryngoscopy, etc., for this service, because this service is routine and incidental to the

bronchoscopy.

If a diagnostic endoscopy is performed, and this results in a decision to perform a (non-endoscopic) surgical procedure, then this endoscopy could be separately reported, indicating that this represented a distinct diagnostic service. Modifier -58 may be used to indicate that the diagnostic endoscopy and the

non-endoscopic surgical procedure are staged or planned procedures. Diagnostic endoscopy of the respiratory system (e.g., sinus endoscopy, laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, pleuroscopy, etc.) performed at the same encounter as a surgical endoscopy is included in the surgical endoscopy, according to CPT Manual guidelines. However, when an open surgical procedure is performed and, at the same session, is accompanied by a "scout" endoscopy to evaluate the surgical field, the endoscopy code is not reported separately. This policy applies if the purpose of the endoscopic procedure is either to confirm the anatomical nature of the patient's respiratory system or to confirm the adequacy of the surgical

procedure (e.g., tracheostomy, etc.). Additionally if an attempt to perform an endoscopic procedure fails and is converted to an open procedure, the endoscopic procedure is not separately reportable with the open procedure. Example: If a patient presents with aspiration of a foreign body and a

bronchoscopy is performed indicating a lobar foreign body obstruction, an attempt may be made to remove the obstruction bronchoscopically. It would be inappropriate to code and bill for both CPT code 31622 (bronchoscopy -

(30)

diagnostic) and code 31635 (surgical bronchoscopy with removal of foreign body); only the "surgical" endoscopy, code 31635, would be appropriate. In this example, if the endoscopic effort is unsuccessful and a thoracotomy is planned, the diagnostic bronchoscopy could be separately coded in addition to the

thoracotomy. Modifier -58 may be used to indicate that the diagnostic

bronchoscopy and the thoracotomy are staged or planned procedures. If the surgeon decided to repeat the bronchoscopy after induction of general

anesthesia to confirm the surgical approach to the foreign body, billing a service for this confirmatory bronchoscopy is inappropriate, although the initial diagnostic bronchoscopy could still be reported. Additionally, the failed bronchoscopic attempt to remove the foreign body should not be reported with an open procedure to remove the foreign body.

4. When a sinusotomy is performed in conjunction with a sinus endoscopy, only one service is reported. If the medically necessary service was the sinusotomy and the endoscopy was performed to evaluate adequacy or visualize the sinus cavity for disease, then the primary procedure would be best represented by the appropriate sinusotomy CPT procedure code. On the other hand, as a

sinusotomy is usually required to accomplish a medically necessary diagnostic (or surgical) sinus endoscopy, the sinus endoscopy would be the primary (medically necessary) service and should be reported. CPT Manual narrative indicates that a surgical sinus endoscopy always includes a sinusotomy and diagnostic endoscopy.

5. Control of bleeding during a procedure is an integral part of endoscopic procedures and is not separately reported (e.g., CPT code 30901 for control of nasal hemorrhage is not to be reported with CPT code 31235 for nasal/sinus endoscopy, etc.). If bleeding is a late complication and requires a significant, separately identifiable service after the patient has been released from the endoscopic procedure, a separate service may be reported with modifier -78, indicating that a related procedure was performed to treat a complication during the postoperative period.

When endoscopic procedures are performed, the most comprehensive code describing the service rendered is reported. If multiple procedures are performed and are not adequately described by a single CPT procedure code, more than one code may be reported; however, the multiple procedure modifier -51 is attached to the appropriate secondary service CPT codes. Additionally, only medically necessary services are reported; incidental examinations of other areas are not to be separately reported.

7. When laryngoscopy is required for placement of an endotracheal tube (e.g., CPT code 31500), a laryngoscopy code is not to be separately coded.

Additionally, when a laryngoscopy is used to place an endotracheal tube for non-emergent reasons (e.g., general anesthesia, bronchoscopy, etc.), a separate

(31)

setting of a rapidly deteriorating patient who will require mechanical ventilation, a separate service may be reported as long as there is adequate documentation of the reasons for intubation.

8. When tracheostomy is performed as an essential part of laryngeal surgery, in accordance with the separate procedure policy, the CPT code 31600 is not separately reported. This would include laryngotomy, laryngectomy, or laryngoplasty codes, or other codes that routinely require placement of a tracheostomy.

9. If a laryngoscopy is required for the placement of a tracheostomy, the

tracheostomy (CPT codes 31603-31614) is reported and not the laryngoscopy. 10. CPT code 92511 (nasopharyngoscopy with endoscopy) should not be reported as a distinct service when performed as a cursory inspection with other respiratory endoscopic procedures.

11. A surgical thoracoscopy is included in and not to be separately reported from an open thoracotomy when performed at the same session; the thoracotomy would represent that the more extensive procedure was successfully

accomplished. If, however, the thoracoscopy was performed for purposes of an initial diagnosis and the decision to perform surgery is based on the results of the thoracoscopy, then it is separately reported. Modifier -58 may be used to

indicate that the diagnostic thoracoscopy and the thoracotomy are staged or planned procedures.

AuditorySystem

1. When a mastoidectomy is included in the description of an auditory procedure (e.g., CPT codes 69530, 69802, 69910), separate codes describing mastoidectomy are not reported.

2. Myringotomies (e.g., CPT codes 69420 and 69421) are included in tympanoplasties and tympanostomies.

F. Operating Microscope

1. CMS allows payment for use of the operating microscope (CPT 69990) with a list of procedures identified in the Internet-Only Manuals(IOM) Medicare Claims

Processing Manual (Publication 100-04), Chapter 12, Section 20.4.5 (Allowable

Adjustments) (formerly Medicare Carriers= Manual, Section 15055). NCCI bundles CPT code 69990 into all other surgical procedures. Most edits do not allow use of NCCI-associated modifiers.

(32)

1. In this Manual many policies are described utilizing the term Aphysician.@ Unless indicated differently, the usage of this term does not restrict the policies to

physicians only; it applies to all practitioners, hospitals, providers, or suppliers eligible to bill the relevant HCPCS/CPT codes pursuant to applicable portions of the Social Security Act (SSA) of 1965, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and Medicare rules. In some sections of this Manual, the term Aphysician@ would not include some of these entities because specific rules do not apply to those entities. For example, Anesthesia Rules and Global Surgery Rules do not apply to hospitals.

2. With few exceptions, the payment for a surgical procedure includes payment for dressings, supplies, and local anesthesia. These items are not separately reportable under their own HCPCS/CPT codes. Wound closures utilizing adhesive strips, topical skin adhesive, or tape alone are not separately reportable. In the absence of an operative procedure, these types of wound closures are included in an E&M service.

3. With limited exceptions,Medicare Anesthesia Rules prevent separate payment for anesthesia for a medical or surgical service when provided by the physician performing the service. The physician should not report CPT codes 00100-01999. Additionally, the physician should not unbundle the anesthesia procedure and report component codes individually. For example, introduction of a needle or intracatheter into a vein (CPT code 36000), venipuncture (CPT code 36410), or drug administration (CPT codes 90760-90775) should not be reported when these services are related to the delivery of an anesthetic agent.

Medicare may allow separate payment for moderate conscious sedation services (CPT codes 99143-99145), when these services are provided by the same physician performing the medical or surgical procedure, except for those procedures listed in Appendix G of the CPT Manual.

Drug administration services (CPT codes 90760-90775) are not separately reportable by the physician who performs an operative procedure for drug administration during the operative procedure.

Under the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), drug administration services related to operative procedures are included in the associated procedural HCPCS/CPT codes. Examples of such drug administration services include, but are not limited to, anesthesia (local or other), hydration, and medications such as anxiolytics or antibiotics. Providers should not report HCPCS/CPT codes C8950-C8952, 90772 or 90773 for these services.

Medicare Global Surgery Rules prevent separate payment for postoperative pain management when provided by the physician performing an operative procedure. HCPCS/CPT codes 36000, 36410, 37202, 62318-62319, 64415-64417, 64450, 64470,

(33)

the postoperative pain management, the operative procedure, or anesthesia for the procedure.

If a physician performing an operative procedure provides a drug administration service (HCPCS/CPT codes 90760-90775, C8950-C8952) for a purpose unrelated to anesthesia, intra-operative care, or post-procedure pain management, the drug administration service (HCPCS/CPT codes 90760-90775, C8950-C8952) may be reported with an NCCI-associated modifier.

4. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) (CPT codes 10021, 10022) should not be reported with another biopsy procedure code for the same lesion unless one specimen is inadequate for diagnosis. For example, an FNA specimen is usually examined for adequacy when the specimen is aspirated. If the specimen is adequate for diagnosis, it is not necessary to obtain an additional biopsy specimen. However, if the specimen is not adequate and another type of biopsy (e.g, needle, open) is subsequently performed at the same patient encounter, the other biopsy procedure code may also be reported with an NCCI-associated modifier.

5. If the code descriptor of a HCPCS/CPT code includes the phrase Aseparate procedure,@ the procedure is subject to NCCI edits based on this designation. CMS does not allow separate reporting of a procedure designated as a Aseparate procedure@ when it is performed at the same patient encounter as another procedure in an anatomically related area through the same skin incision, orifice, or surgical approach.

(34)
(35)

APPENDIX

TEMPLATE: RESPIRATORY SYSTEM EXAMINATION

REQUIREMENTS

(36)

Respiratory System Exam Requirements

Examination: N = Normal ABN = Abnormal NE = Not Evaluated COMMENT= Significant positive or negative findings

Element N ABN NE Comment

Constitutional __Measurement of any three of the following seven vital signs: 1) sitting or standing blood

pressure, 2) supine blood pressure, 3) pulse rate and regularity, 4) respiration, 5) temperature, 6) height, 7) weight (May be measured and recorded by ancillary staff)

__General appearance of patient (e.g., development, nutrition, body habitus, deformities,

attention to grooming) Head and Face

Eyes

Ears, Nose, Mouth and Throat

__Inspection of nasal mucosa, septum and turbinates

__Inspection of teeth and gums

__Examination of oropharynx (e.g., oral mucosa, hard and soft palates, tongue, tonsils and posterior pharynx)

(37)

(e.g., masses, overall appearance, symmetry, tracheal position, crepitus)

__Examination of thyroid (e.g., enlargement, tenderness, mass)__Examination of

jugular veins (e.g., distension; a, v or cannon a waves) Respiratory __Inspection of chest with notation of symmetry and expansion

__Assessment of respiratory effort (e.g., intercostal

retractions, use of accessory muscles,

diaphragmatic movement)

__Percussion of chest (e.g., dullness, flatness,

hyperresonance)

__Palpation of chest (e.g., tactile fremitus)

__Auscultation of lungs (e.g., breath sounds, adventitious sounds, rubs)

Cardiovascular

__Auscultation of heart including sounds, abnormal sounds and murmurs

__Examination of peripheral vascular system by

observation (e.g., swelling, varicosities) and

palpation (e.g., pulses, temperature, edema, tenderness)

Chest (Breasts)

Gastrointestinal (Abdomen)

__Examination of abdomen with notation of presence of masses or tenderness

(38)

spleen

Genitourinary

Lymphatic __Palpation of lymph nodes in neck, axillae, groin and/or other location

Musculoskeletal

__Assessment of muscle strength and tone (e.g., flaccid, cog wheel, spastic) with notation of

any atrophy and abnormal movements

__Examination of gait and station

Extremities __Inspection and palpation of digits and nails (e.g., clubbing, cyanosis, inflammation, petechiae, ischemia, infections, nodes) Skin __Inspection and/or palpation of skin and subcutaneous tissue (e.g., rashes, lesions, ulcers) Neurological/ Brief

assessment of mental status including

Psychiatric

$ Orientation to time, place and person

$ Mood and affect (e.g., depression, anxiety, agitation)

(39)

Problem Focused One to five elements identified by a bullet. Expanded Problem Focused At least six elements identified by a bullet.

Detailed At least twelve elements identified by a bullet. Comprehensive Perform all elements identified by a bullet;

document every element in each box with a shaded border and at least one element in each box with an unshaded border.

References

Related documents