• No results found

Method Statement. Static Pile Load Test

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Method Statement. Static Pile Load Test"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Method Statement

FOR

Static Pile Load Test

(Compression Test,Tension Test and Lateral Test)

(2)

2

METHOD STATEMENT

FOR

COMPRESSION, TENSILE

AND LATERAL PILE LOAD TEST

PROJECT INFORMATION

Owner : ……….. Client : ……….. Main Contractor : ………. Contractor : ………. Location : ……….

TEST PILE INFORMATION

Pile No. 385

Pile No. 368

Pile No. 416

Pile Type

40 x 40 Driven

40 x 40 Driven

40 x 40 Driven

Pile Tip

4.2 m.

4.2 m.

4.2 m.

Pile Top

0.0 m.

0.0 m.

0.0 m.

Design Load

65 tons

15 tons

7 tons

Maximum Test Load

(200 % of design

Load)

130 tons

30 tons

14 tons

Test Type

Axial Compression

Test

Axial Tension Test

Lateral Test

Anchor Piles

367, 368, 416, 417

367, 369

432, 417, 385

(3)

3

1.0 TESTING

APPARATUS

1.1 Reaction Beam

The steel girders will be laid across the test pile with system set up similar to that shown in Appendix A.

1.2 Hydraulic Jacks

Axial Compressive Test : One hydraulic jack (1x400) ton capacity will be provided on top of the pile head as loading apparatus.

Axial Tension Test : One hydraulic jack (1x165) ton capacity will be provided on top of the pile head as loading apparatus.

Lateral Test : One hydraulic jack (1x59) ton capacity will be provided on the side of the pile head as loading apparatus.

1.3 Ball Bearing

To provide non-eccentric load to the pile head, a ball bearing shall be inserted in between the reaction beam and the hydraulic jack.

1.4 Dial gauges

Four dial gauges (Mitutoyo brand) will be provided to monitor the pile movements by mounting between the pile head and reference beams. The micrometer has a range of 0-50 mm and an accuracy of 0.01 mm.

1.5 Reference Beam

Two reference beams (channel 125x65x5 mm) will be cross-connected and laid on support, firmly embedded in ground with one end fixed and the other end freed.

1.6 Leveling instrument

Relative movements of the test pile head, reference beam and anchor pile will be checked by a Shokisha precise leveling instrument with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. Readings will be made on ruler scale fixed on the reading points (1 point at pile head, 2 points at reference beams and 1 point at each anchor pile).

2.0 TEST

PROCEDURE

2.1 Compression Pile Load Test

The test shall conform to the modified ASTM D 1143-81(Reapproved 1994) item 5.0

“Standard Loading Procedure” with load sequence in percentage of design load. Three cycles

of test will be performed.

Cycle 1 (maximum to 100% of the design load)

A. The load will be added gradually by increasing from initial 0 to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the design load.

B. When each load increment will be achieved, the next load increment will be added only when the settlement rate will be less than 0.25 mm per hour or after 2 hours, whichever shall occur first.

C. At each load increment, load, settlement and time will be recorded at 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 240 minutes and every 2 hours with an accuracy of at least 0.01 mm. D. The maximum load will be kept constant for at least 24 hours and then reduced to

75%, 50%, 25% and 0% of the design load, respectively. Each load will be maintained until the rate of settlement would not be greater than 0.25 mm per hour or after two hours, whichever shall occur first.

E. At "0" load, rebound movement will be recorded at 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 40, 60 minutes and every hour thereafter until a constant settlement will be reached.

(4)

4

A. The load will be added gradually by increasing from initial 0 to 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175% and 200% of the design load.

B. When each load increment will be achieved, the next load increment will be added every after 5 minutes..

C. At each load increment, load, settlement and time will be recorded at 1

and 5 minutes with an accuracy of at least 0.01 mm.

D. The load will then be reduced to 175%, 150%, 125%, 100%, 75%, 50%,

25% and 0% of the design load, respectively

E. At "0" load, rebound movement will be recorded at 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 40,

60 minutes and every hour thereafter until a no further settlement will be

experienced.

F. The test pile will be considered failure when a rapid progressive

movement of the pile in the direction of loading under a constant load or

physical failure of the test pile is observed or a

settlement of more than

15% of the diagonal dimension of the pile

, which is equivalent to 90

mm.

2.2 Tension Pile Load Test

The test shall conform to the ASTM D 3689-90 (Reapproved 1995) “Standard Test

Method for Individual Piles Under Static Axial Tensile Load.” with load sequence as explain

below. The test will be conducted until the pile exhibit signs of failure. Cycle 1 (maximum to 100% of the design load)

A. The load will be added gradually by increasing from initial 0 to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the design load.

B. When each load increment will be achieved, the next load increment will be added only when the settlement rate will be less than 0.25 mm per hour or after 2 hours, whichever shall occur first.

C. At each load increment, load, settlement and time will be recorded at 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 240 minutes and every 2 hours with an accuracy of at least 0.01 mm. D. The maximum load will be kept constant for at least 24 hours and then reduced to

75%, 50%, 25% and 0% of the design load, respectively. Each load will be maintained until the rate of settlement would not be greater than 0.25 mm per hour or after two hours, whichever shall occur first.

E. At "0" load, rebound movement will be recorded at 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 40, 60 minutes and every hour thereafter until a constant settlement will be reached.

Cycle 2 (QUICK TEST, maximum to 200% of the design load)

A. The load will be added gradually by increasing from initial 0 to 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175% and 200% of the design load.

B. When each load increment will be achieved, the next load increment will be added every after 5 minutes..

G. At each load increment, load, settlement and time will be recorded at 1

and 5 minutes with an accuracy of at least 0.01 mm.

H. The load will then be reduced to 175%, 150%, 125%, 100%, 75%, 50%,

25% and 0% of the design load, respectively

I.At "0" load, rebound movement will be recorded at 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 40, 60

minutes and every hour thereafter until a no further settlement will be

experienced.

J. The test pile will be considered failure when a rapid progressive

movement of the pile in the direction of loading under a constant load or

physical failure of the test pile is observed or a

settlement of more than

(5)

5

15% of the diagonal dimension of the pile

, which is equivalent to 90

mm.

2.3 Lateral Pile Load Test

The test shall conform to the ASTM D 3966-90 “Standard Test Method for Individual

Piles Under Lateral Load.” with load sequence as explain below. The test will be conducted

until the pile exhibit signs of failure.

A. The load will be added gradually by increasing from initial 0 to 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 170%, 180%, 190% and 200% of the design load.

B. When each load increment will be achieved, the next load increment will be added after each load duration shown in Table 3.

C. At each load increment, load and time will be recorded at 1, 5, 10 minutes with an accuracy of at least 0.01 mm.

D. The test pile will be considered failure when a rapid progressive movement of the pile in the direction of loading under a constant load or physical failure of the test pile is observed.

During the load test, records including plots of load vs. time and load vs. settlement will be maintained progressively.

3.0 RESULTS OF TEST

The test results will then be reported in the form of:

x Time, load, pile head movements, settlements and reference beam movements. x Load-settlement curve.

x Time-settlement curve. x Time-load curve.

(6)

ESTIMATION OF ULTIMATE LOAD FROM PILE LOAD TEST BY DAVISSON METHOD

Fc'=

400

ksc.

Pile Dia.=

0.46

m.

Q=

270

Tons

L=

12.8

m.

A=

0.16

sq.m.

Ec=

29,427

Mpa

Ec=

3.00E+06

Tons/sq.m.

Settle-1=

7.02

mm.

Settle-1=

2.81

inch

Settle-2=

0.50

inch

Settle-2=

1.27

mm.

Settle-3=

0.14

inch

Settle-3=

0.35

mm.

Total Settle=

3.44

inch

Davidson Offset Line Limit=

3.44

inch

Davidson Offset Line Limit=

8.75

(7)

APPENDIX A

TABLES, FIGURES &

DESIGN CALCULATIONS

(8)

K a e n g K h o i 2 P o w e r P la n t (C o m p r e s s io n T e s t in g )

Design Load = 65 Tons FS = 2 Test Load = 130 Tons

Hydraulic Jack No./s 905 CYCLE 1: Maximum to 100% of the design load.

Date Start Interval Load Pressure Remarks

Time (hours) (Tons) (Bars) (%)

3-Jul 09:00 1 16.3 18.0 25% 10:00 1 32.5 34.0 50% 11:00 1 48.8 50.1 75% 12:00 1 65.0 66.1 100% 13:00 24 48.8 56.0 75% 4-Jul 13:00 1 32.5 39.9 50% 14:00 1 16.3 23.8 25% 15:00 2 0.0 0.0 0%

CYCLE 2: QUICK TEST; Maximum to 200% of the design load.

Date Start Interval Load Pressure Remarks

Time (min) (Tons) (Bars) (%)

4-Jul 17:00 5 16.3 18.0 25% 17:05 5 32.5 34.0 50% 17:10 5 48.8 50.1 75% 17:15 5 65.0 66.1 100% 17:20 5 81.3 82.1 125% 17:25 5 97.5 98.1 150% 17:30 5 113.8 114.1 175% 17:35 5 130.0 130.2 200% 17:40 5 113.8 120.4 175% 17:45 5 97.5 104.3 150% 17:50 5 81.3 88.2 125% 17:55 5 65.0 72.1 100% 18:00 5 48.8 56.0 75% 18:05 5 32.5 39.9 50% 18:10 5 16.3 23.8 25% 18:15 120 0.0 0.0 0%

P ile N o . 385

Table 1

Schedule of Loading

(9)

K a e n g K h o i 2 P o w e r P la n t (T e n s io n T e s t in g )

Design Load = 15 Tons FS = 2 Test Load = 30 Tons

Hydraulic Jack No./s 912 CYCLE 1: Maximum to 100% of the design load.

Date Start Interval Load Pressure Remarks

Time (hours) (Tons) (Bars) (%)

6-Jul 09:00 1 3.8 18.3 25% 10:00 1 7.5 31.8 50% 11:00 1 11.3 45.3 75% 12:00 24 15.0 58.8 100% 12:00 1 11.3 71.9 75% 7-Jul 12:00 1 7.5 58.3 50% 13:00 1 3.8 44.7 25% 13:00 2 0.0 0.0 0%

CYCLE 2: QUICK TEST; Maximum to 200% of the design load.

Date Start Interval Load Pressure Remarks

Time (min) (Tons) (Bars) (%)

7-Jul 15:00 5 3.8 18.3 25% 15:05 5 7.5 31.8 50% 15:10 5 11.3 45.3 75% 15:15 5 15.0 58.8 100% 15:20 5 18.8 72.3 125% 15:25 5 22.5 85.9 150% 15:30 5 26.3 99.4 175% 15:35 5 30.0 112.9 200% 15:40 5 26.3 126.4 175% 15:45 5 22.5 112.8 150% 15:50 5 18.8 99.2 125% 15:55 5 15.0 85.6 100% 16:00 5 11.3 71.9 75% 16:05 5 7.5 58.3 50% 16:10 5 3.8 44.7 25% 16:15 120 0.0 0.0 0%

P ile N o . 368

Table 2

Schedule of Loading

(10)

K a e n g K h o i 2 P o w e r P la n t (L a t e r a l T e s t in g )

Design Load = 7 Tons FS = 2 Test Load = 14 Tons

Hydraulic Jack No./s 8 CYCLE 1: Maximum to 100% of the design load.

Date Start Interval Load Pressure Remarks

Time min (Tons) (Bars) (%)

10-Jul 09:00 10 1.8 36.2 25% 09:10 10 3.5 51.9 50% 09:20 15 5.3 67.6 75% 09:35 20 7.0 83.2 100% 09:55 20 8.8 98.9 125% 10:15 20 10.5 114.5 150% 10:35 20 11.9 127.1 170% 10:55 20 12.6 133.3 180% 11:15 20 13.3 139.6 190% 11:35 60 14.0 145.8 200% 12:35 10 10.5 118.0 150% 12:45 10 7.0 86.0 100% 12:55 10 3.5 54.1 50% 13:05 0.0 0.0 0%

P ile N o . 416

Table 3

Schedule of Loading

(11)

A S TM Testing Co., Ltd. 1 032/21 7 Pha hol y o thin 1 8 /1 Ro ad, B ang k o k 10 900 : (662)+ 27 2-247 4! 5 : ( 6 62)+ 27 2-247 5 CALI

BRATION OF ONE HYDRAULI

C J ACK FOR ST ATI C PILE LOAD TE STI NG

Kaeng Khoi 2 Power Plant (Compression Testing)

LOADING UNLOADING G age R dg. LOADING (Ton s) G age R d g. UNLOADING (Tons) in bar s (Y ) 9 05 TO TA L (X ) in bar s (Y ) 9 05 TO TA L (X ) 00 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 50 49.5 49.5 50 43.5 43.5 10 0 1 00 .5 100 .5 10 0 9 3 .5 93.5 15 0 1 50 .5 150 .5 15 0 1 43 .5 1 43.5 20 0 1 99 .5 199 .5 20 0 1 93 .5 1 93.5 25 0 2 50 .0 250 .0 25 0 2 44 .0 2 44.0 30 0 3 02 .0 302 .0 30 0 2 95 .0 2 95.0 35 0 3 52 .0 352 .0 35 0 3 45 .5 3 45.5 40 0 4 03 .5 403 .5 40 0 3 95 .5 3 95.5 45 0 4 56 .5 456 .5 45 0 4 48 .0 4 48.0 48 0 4 85 .0 485 .0 C a li br at ed Regression Output : Regression Output : Constant 2.00 76 286 6 Constant 7 .722 12 36 2 Std Err of Y Est 1.18 92 093 4 Std Err of Y Est 0 .748 16 82 7 R Squa red 0.99 99 427 5 R Squa red 0 .999 97 38 8 No . of Observ at ion s 10 No . of Observ at ion s 9 D e g r ees of F r eedom 8 D e g r ees of F r eedom 7 X C o e ffi ci en t( s ) 0.98 57 852 7 X C o e ffi ci en t( s ) 0 .990 23 65 5 L O AD IN G (Y ) = 0.9858 * X + 2.0076 U N LO AD IN G (Y ) = 0. 9902 * X + 7. 7221

ASTM

(12)

A S TM Testing Co., Ltd. 43 7-4 41 Kam p ang pet h II I Roa d, beh ind Jatu ja k Park , Ba ng k o k 10 90 0 T H AILAND : (6 62)+ 272 -59 66~ 7 , 27 2-4 565 , 2 72-597 3, 272 -45 82 : (66 2)+ 27 2-4 583 C A LIBRA TION OF ON E HYD RA ULIC J A C K FOR S T

ATIC PILE LOA

D TESTING

Kaeng Khoi 2 Power Plant(Tension Testing)

LOADING UNLOADING G a ge R d g. LOADING (Tons) G a ge R d g. UNLOA DING (Tons) in b a rs ( Y ) 9 1 2 T OTAL ( X ) in b a rs ( Y ) 9 1 2 T OT AL (X) 00 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 100 27 .0 27.0 100 20.0 2 0.0 200 53 .5 53.5 200 46.0 4 6.0 300 82 .0 82.0 300 73.0 7 3.0 400 109 .0 109.0 400 101.0 10 1.0 500 138 .0 138.0 500 130.0 13 0.0 600 165 .0 165.0 C a libr a ted Regression Output : Regression Output : Constant 4 .7 289 954 0 Constant 3 1 .033 571 24 Std E rr of Y Est 2 .2 705 412 1 Std E rr of Y Est 3.92 681 306 R S q uared 0 .9 998 821 6 R S q uared 0.99 953 740 N o . of Observations 6 No . of O b servation s 5 Deg rees of Freedom 4 De gre es of F reedom 3 X C o effi ci ent (s) 3 .6 059 634 9 X C o effici ent (s) 3.63 468 147 L O AD IN G (Y ) = 3.6060 * X + 4.7290 U N L O A D I N G (Y ) = 3.6347 * X + 31.0336

ASTM

(13)

A S TM Testing Co., Ltd. 437-441 Kam pangpeth III Ro ad, behind J a tuj ak Par k , Bangk ok 10900 T H A ILA N D : ( 662 )+ 2 72-596 6~7 , 2 7 2-456 5, 27 2-5 973 , 2 7 2 -45 82 : ( 6 62 )+ 27 2-4 5 8 3 CALIBRATION OF ONE HYDRAULIC J ACK

FOR STATIC PILE L

OAD TE

STING

Kaeng Khoi 2 Power Plant(Lateral Testing)

LOADING UNLOA DING Gage R dg. LOADING (T on s) G a ge R d g. UNLOADING (Tons) in ba r s (Y) 8 TOTA L (X ) in ba r s (Y) 8 T O T A L (X ) 00 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 50 3.0 3.0 50 3.0 3.0 10 0 9 .0 9.0 10 0 9 .0 9.0 15 0 1 5 .0 1 5.0 15 0 1 4 .5 1 4.5 20 0 2 0 .0 2 0.0 20 0 1 9 .0 1 9.0 25 0 2 5 .5 2 5.5 25 0 2 5 .0 2 5.0 30 0 3 1 .0 3 1.0 30 0 3 0 .0 3 0.0 35 0 3 7 .0 3 7.0 35 0 3 5 .5 3 5.5 40 0 4 2 .0 4 2.0 40 0 4 1 .0 4 1.0 45 0 4 8 .0 4 8.0 45 0 4 7 .0 4 7.0 50 0 5 4 .0 5 4.0 50 0 5 3 .0 5 3.0 55 0 5 9 .0 5 9.0 Ca li b r a te d Regression Output : Re gre ssion Output : Constant 2 0 .5 7 458 863 Constant 22 .0 971 851 5 Std Err of Y Est 2. 76 858 80 1 Std Err of Y Est 4. 164 896 90 R Squared 0. 99 974 91 4 R Squared 0. 999 327 17 No. of Observati ons 11 No. of Observa tions 10 Deg rees of Freedom 9 Deg re es of Freedom 8 X C o efficient(s) 8. 94 812 08 9 X C o effi ci en t( s ) 9. 130 065 52 L O AD IN G (Y ) = 8.9481 * X + 20.5746 U N L O AD IN G (Y ) = 9.1301 * X + 22.0972

ASTM

(14)

KHAENG KHOI 2 Power Plant Project

ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.

416

367

368

417

385

Main Beam

Main Beam

Hydraulic Jack

(15)

KHAENG KHOI 2 Power Plant Project

ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.

369

368

367

Hydraulic Jack

Figure 2 Tension Test

367

368

369

Reaction Beam

(16)

KHAENG KHOI 2 Power Plant Project

ASTM TESTING CO., LTD.

417

385

432

416

Hydraulic Jack

Figure 3 Lateral Test

416

417

(17)

APPENDIX B

(18)

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

1

APPENDIX C

(19)

Infratech ASTM CO., LTD.

2

APPENDIX D

References

Related documents

The work attempts to elucidate the idea of religious pluralism of two very im- portant figures in the traditions of Judaism and Islam: Abraham Joshua Heschel (1907-1972)

The variables in question included substance abuse counselors‟ gender, level of education, field of study, ethnicity, and the number of continuing education hours to determine if

tEachEr Education • EduCluster Finland Ltd • Finland University Ltd • Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences • Häme University of Applied Sciences (HAMK) •

Secondary (contributing) conditions that are addressed and provide additional details to support the medical necessity of the encounter are listed AFTER the principal

service facilities; namely passenger stations, freight terminals, marshalling yards, maintenance facilities and refuelling facilities. The indicators for the description

This dissertation seeks to explore the use of personal therapy among trainees and the extent to which use of personal therapy is supported by training programs, perceptions

The material presented by the author does not necessarily represent the viewpoint of editors and the management of Indus Institute of Higher Education (IIHE) as well as the

The VMMC modeling collection also includes four papers that explore the impact of scale- up progress thus far [ 4 ], the potential cost-effectiveness of increasing demand among 20-