• No results found

CAPTURE. Collaboration and Proactive Teamwork Used to Reduce. Monthly Collaborative Call #16 March 25, :00 2:30 p.m. CST

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CAPTURE. Collaboration and Proactive Teamwork Used to Reduce. Monthly Collaborative Call #16 March 25, :00 2:30 p.m. CST"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Monthly Collaborative Call #16

March 25, 2014 2:00 – 2:30 p.m. CST

C A P T U R E

Collaboration and Proactive Teamwork Used to Reduce

Falls

Risk Assessments…what are hospitals using and how good are they at assessing fall risk?

(2)

AGENDA

1. Housekeeping

2. Fall Rates… sneak peak at progress

3. Risk Assessments…what are hospitals using and how good are they at detecting risk?

4. Revising and Sustaining the Reporting Process 5. Event Report Review: Does this happen in your

hospital

6. Open discussion

(3)

Feb.

 

– March

 

HSOPS;

 

results

 

end

 

of

 

May

April

 

– May

 

TPQ

 

April

 

– June

 

2014

 

Final

 

site

 

visit

 

Jan

 

– March

 

Progress

 

reports…

 

– What did we provide that would have been 

difficult/impossible for you to calculate?

– What was helpful what wasn’t? 

Fall

 

Rate

 

Reporting

3

Housekeeping

(4)

• Providing trends for fall rates quantified progress • Providing recommendations for future actions 

provided direction 

• Providing charts where two factors are displayed 

(cross tabs) such as patient activity and time of 

day helps identify system issues (see example on 

next slide)

(5)

5

Example

 

of

 

Cross

 

Tab

 

Bar

 

Chart

3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 2 3

Fell while ambulating to bathroom w/o assistance Rolled out / Slipped off of bed Fall related to Chair/Recliner Fell while ambulating w/assistance Fell while ambulating w/o assistance Fell while left alone toileting/on commode Fell while toileting/on commode w/assistance Fell while transferring w/o assistance

Association Between Patient Activity and Time of Day 

Aug 2012 ‐ Mar 2014 (n=14)

(6)

6

Progress…

7.16 2.72 5.04 1.44 0 2 4 6 8

Total Fall Rate Injurious Fall Rate

Fa lls   per   1000   Pt .   Da ys

Changes in Fall Rates 2012 ‐ 2013 

(n=9 CAPTURE Falls Hospitals)

2012 2013

CAH benchmark rates from the 2011 survey were 6.3 total falls/1000 pt. days and 1.8 injurious falls/1000 pt. days.

(7)

Tool Beginning of Project Current Determined to be at Risk Clinical Judgment/No specific tool 2 0 NA FRASS 0 2 91.7%

Home Grown Tool 5 2 89.1%

Hendrich II 1 1 51.6%

Johns Hopkins 0 2 88.9%

Morse 9 7 87.6%

Schmid 0 3 96.3%

7

(8)

Hendrich

 

II

• Get Up & Go Test not being 

scored based on performance 1. Sit comfortably in a straight‐

backed arm chair.

2. Rise from the chair (can use 

arm rests).

3. Stand still momentarily. 4. Walk a short distance 

(approximately 3 meters). 5. Turn around.

6. Walk back to the chair. 7. Turn around.

8. Sit down in the chair.

Scoring: Observe patient's 

movements for any deviation 

from a confident, normal 

(9)

• Assess inter‐rater reliability of your tool…would all score 

a paper case the same?

• Move beyond “is this patient at risk?” To….

– Why is this patient at risk? 

– What intrinsic factors increase the likelihood that patient will 

have difficulty maintaining center of gravity inside base of 

support?

– Which interventions address these factors?

9

(10)

Why

 

is

 

this

 

patient

 

at

 

risk?

• Age…65 – 79, 80+ 

• Mental Status

– Intermittent confusion

– Limited insight into 

impairments

– Poor short term memory

• Emotion/depression

– Agitated

– Anxious, uncooperative

• Toileting

– Catheter/ostomy

– Ambulatory with urge 

incontinence

• Hx of falls w/in 6 mos.

• Sensory Impairment

– Vision

– Hearing

• Activity

– Level of assist transfers, gait 

– Steadiness of gait – Weak/Deconditioned • Medications – Cardiovascular – Antidepressants – Psychotropics – Sedatives – Anticoagulants – AntiParkinsons – Opioids – Diuretics – Polypharmacy

(11)

• All risk assessments are doing a reasonable job of 

identifying patients at risk EXCEPT when there is a 

systematic error in conducting the assessment as 

in one facility’s use of the Hendrich II

• Risk assessments are most useful when 

interventions are linked to the risk factors and 

personnel take action based on their knowledge 

of these factors (ie, intermittent confusion, 

weakness, and anticoagulants = DO NOT LEAVE 

PATIENT ALONE WHILE TOILETING)

• Ensure the reliability of interventions with audits

11

(12)

1. What happened/how did the patient fall 

capturing activity and assistance (17 scenarios)

– Fell while ambulating to bathroom w/o assist

– Fell while ambulating to bathroom w/ assist

– Fell while transferring w/o assist

– Fell while transferring w/assist

– Fell while left alone on toilet/commode

– Fell while toileting/on commode w/assist

– Fall related to chair/recliner

– Fell while dressing/undressing related to shower

– Fell while reaching

– Rolled out/slipped off of bed 12

(13)

2. How was the fall discovered?

– Patient found on floor

– Notified by family/friend/another patient

– Notified by non‐clinical staff

– Notified by ancillary staff

– Reported by patient

– Patient calling for help

– Alarm sounding

– Patient call light

– Staff assisting

– Staff observed 13

(14)

Discussion

• Specificity of these two factors will help 

identify systems issues contributing to falls.

14

(15)

• 89 y/o male

• (L) sided weakness due to CVA; SNF for PT/OT • Fell one day after admission approx. 9:00 pm

• Pt. taken to bathroom, left alone. Pt. got up and 

fell backwards striking head; walker had been 

removed from bathroom to remind pt. not to get 

up on own, reminded to use call light. 

• Contributing factors: melatonin given 15 min. 

before, on anticoagulants

• 3 days later CT revealed frontal lobe hemorrhage

15

(16)

Future Plans / Ideas for Sustainment

• Revise Fall Event Reporting Form to include only items 

useful in creating knowledge about the system

• Simplify Post‐Fall Huddle Form

• Create Fall Event Reporting and Analysis Tool for CAHs to 

share Knowledge and Wisdom 

• Create Fall Rate Benchmarks for Project Hospitals

• Discuss creation of Fall Rate Benchmarks for Nebraska 

and Nebraska’s Critical Access Hospitals

• Other Ideas?

(17)

Goal

 

Reporting

 

system

 

for

 

falls

 

to

 

provide

 

benchmarking,

 

analysis,

 

and

 

quality

 

improvement

 

support

 

for

 

CAHs

17

(18)

18

REMINDERS

Monthly Call: April 22, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. CST

Webinar #10: Best Practices in Health Literacy and Patient Education

Denise Britigan, MA, PhD, CHES

Assistant Professor Department of Health Promotion, Social, and Behavioral Health

College of Public Health

University of Nebraska Medical Center Resources posted at

(19)

University of Nebraska Medical Center

University of Nebraska Medical Center

C A P T U R E

Collaboration and Proactive Teamwork Used to Reduce

Falls

http://unmc.edu/patient-safety/capturefalls/ Enter “capture falls” in google

References

Related documents

The framework projects, designed by Farrans along with their consultant Jacobs, involve site investigation, design, installation, testing and commissioning of new and

The construction of medical information is important to improve the hospital medical care capability, the management decision-making level of health and the hospital

• Skill Development & Office Administration Program, Total Participants benefited: 55 • Entrepreneurship & Project Management programs, Total Participants benefited: 59 •

Samer, a displaced Syrian barber, has taken refuge along with his young family in the Zaatari Refugee Camp in Jordan.. Despite filling his time with meaningful work, caring for

The CFC engineering tool (Continuous Function Chart) is available as a STEP 7 option package, particularly for tech- nologists who also configure the user program of the plant..

Hence, this article intends to examine the elements involved in care work, body work, and cross-border migration as they cohere in the embodied practices of migrant nurses trained

Abstract This study examines the relationship between Tongan students’ attitudes and beliefs towards their school experiences and their academic achievement on the high- stakes

Practicing Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs about Mathematics Hem Chand Dayal, School of Education, University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji.. Bronwen Cowie, Faculty