Victor Malka
Laboratoire d’Optique Appliquée
ENSTA ParisTech – Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS
PALAISEAU, France
Accelerators : One century of exploration of the infinitively small
Quarks
10
-2110
-1910
-1710
-1510
-1310
-111880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
2020
Year
Explored
wa
veleng
th
values
(m)
Cathodic tube
J. Thomson
1931 E. Lawrence, first
Cyclotron @ 80 keV
Univ. of Berkeley
380 MeV Cyclotron
Berkeley,
Bevatron
50 GeV
Synchrotron PS
28 GeV CERN
SLAC
50 GeV
LEP 90 GeV
CERN
Tevatron
FermiLab
LHC
3.5 TeV
CERN
Atom
Nucleus
Industrial Market for Accelerators
Application
(2007) approx.
Total systems
System
sold/yr
Sales/yr
(M$)
price (M$)
System
Cancer Therapy
9100
500
1800
2.0 - 5.0
Ion Implantation
9500
500
1400
1.5 - 2.5
Electron cutting and welding
4500
100
150
0.5 - 2.5
Electron beam and X rays irradiators
2000
75
130
0.2 - 8.0
Radio-isotope production (incl. PET)
550
50
70
1.0 - 30
Non destructive testing (incl. Security)
650
100
70
0.3 - 2.0
Ion beam analysis (incl. AMS)
200
25
30
0.4 - 1.5
Neutron generators (incl. sealed tubes)
1000
50
30
0.1 - 3.0
Total
27500
1400
3680
Total accelerators sales increasing more than 10% per year
The development of state of the art accelerators for HEP has lead to :
research in other field of science (light source, spallation neutron sources…)
industrial accelerators (cancer therapy, ion implant., electron cutting&welding...)
How to excite relativistic plasma waves ?
electron density perturbation and longitudinal wakefield
The laser wake field : broad resonance condition
τ
laser
∼
T
p
/2 => short laser pulse
wave in the wake of a boat
T. Tajima and J. Dawson, PRL 43, 267 (1979)
F=∇I
E
z
= 0.3 GV/m for 1% density perturbation at 10
17
cm
-3
Quasi mono-energetic electron beam
Electron distribution
-
Experimental data
-
3D PIC Simulations
J. Faure et al., Nature 431, 541 (2004)
Experimental parameters : E=1J,
τ
L=30fs,
The Bubble regime : distribution quality improvements
SMLWF=>FLWF=>Bubble
Colliding Laser Pulses Scheme
Ponderomotive force of beatwave: F
p~ 2a
0a
1/
λ
0(a
0et a
1can be “weak”)
Boost electrons locally and injects them INJECTION IS LOCAL and IN FIRST BUCKET
Theory : E. Esarey et al., PRL 79, 2682 (1997), H. Kotaki et al., PoP 11 (2004)
Experiments : J. Faure et al., Nature 444, 737 (2006)
The first laser creates the accelera,ng structure
A second laser beam is used to heat electrons
Wakefield
Pump beam
Injec2on
beam
Colliding Laser Pulses Scheme
Ponderomotive force of beatwave: F
p~ 2a
0a
1/
λ
0(a
0et a
1can be “weak”)
Boost electrons locally and injects them INJECTION IS LOCAL and IN FIRST BUCKET
Theory : E. Esarey et al., PRL 79, 2682 (1997), H. Kotaki et al., PoP 11 (2004)
Experiments : J. Faure et al., Nature 444, 737 (2006)
The first laser creates the accelera,ng structure
A second laser beam is used to heat electrons
Wakefield
Pump beam
Injec2on
beam
Injec&on phase
Colliding Laser Pulses Scheme
Ponderomotive force of beatwave: F
p~ 2a
0a
1/
λ
0(a
0et a
1can be “weak”)
Boost electrons locally and injects them INJECTION IS LOCAL and IN FIRST BUCKET
Theory : E. Esarey et al., PRL 79, 2682 (1997), H. Kotaki et al., PoP 11 (2004)
Experiments : J. Faure et al., Nature 444, 737 (2006)
The first laser creates the accelera,ng structure
A second laser beam is used to heat electrons
Wakefield
Pump beam
Injec2on
beam
Injec&on phase
Beatwave
Wakefield
Pump beam
Injec2on
beam
Injec&on phase
Beatwave
Trapped electrons
Accelera&on phase
Accelera&on phase
Towards a Stable Laser Plasma Accelerators
Towards a Stable Laser Plasma Accelerators
Nb: very few electrons at low energy,
δ
E/E=5% limited by the spectrometer
Series of 28 consecu,ve shots wi
th :
a
0=1.5, a
1=0.4, n
e=5.7×10
18cm
-3Tunability of Laser Plasma Accelerators : electrons energy
Z
inj=225 μm
late injec*on pump injec*on pump injec*on middle injec*on pump injec*on early injec+on accelerating distanceTunability of Laser Plasma Accelerators : electrons energy
Z
inj=225 μm
Z
inj=125 μm
late injec*on pump injec*on pump injec*on middle injec*on pump injec*on early injec+on accelerating distanceTunability of Laser Plasma Accelerators : electrons energy
Z
inj=225 μm
Z
inj=125 μm
Z
inj=25 μm
late injec*on pump injec*on pump injec*on middle injec*on pump injec*on early injec+on accelerating distanceTunability of Laser Plasma Accelerators : electrons energy
Z
inj=225 μm
Z
inj=125 μm
Z
inj=‐75 μm
Z
inj=25 μm
late injec*on pump injec*on pump injec*on middle injec*on pump injec*on early injec+on accelerating distanceTunability of Laser Plasma Accelerators : electrons energy
Z
inj=225 μm
Z
inj=125 μm
Z
inj=‐75 μm
Z
inj=‐175 μm
Z
inj=25 μm
late injec*on pump injec*on pump injec*on middle injec*on pump injec*on early injec+on accelerating distanceTunability of Laser Plasma Accelerators : electrons energy
Z
inj=225 μm
Z
inj=125 μm
Z
inj=‐75 μm
Z
inj=‐175 μm
Z
inj=‐275 μm
Z
inj=25 μm
late injec*on pump injec*on pump injec*on middle injec*on pump injec*on early injec+on accelerating distanceTunability of Laser Plasma Accelerators : electrons energy
Z
inj=225 μm
Z
inj=125 μm
Z
inj=‐75 μm
Z
inj=‐175 μm
Z
inj=‐275 μm
Z
inj=‐375
μm
Z
inj=25 μm
late injec*on pump injec*on pump injec*on middle injec*on pump injec*on early injec+on accelerating distanceMono energetic distribution : 1% relative energy spread
1.5 fs RMS duration : Peak current of 4 kA
Spectral features
Peak at 3
μ
m
Coherent
Analytic CTR model
Gaussian pulse shape
Measured e-beam :
Charge
Energy
Divergence
Bunch duration
Peak wavelength
Peak intensity
O. Lundh et al., Nature Physics, March 2011
1.5 fs RMS duration : Peak current of 4 kA
Spectral features
Peak at 3
μ
m
Coherent
Analytic CTR model
Gaussian pulse shape
Measured e-beam :
Charge
Energy
Divergence
Bunch duration
Peak wavelength
Peak intensity
O. Lundh et al., Nature Physics, March 2011
Cancer treatment improvements : real case of prostate
250 MeV electrons
X rays IMRT
Difference
Y. Glinec, et al., Med. Phys. 33, (1) 155-162 (2006)
T. Fuchs, et al. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 3315-3328 (2009)
irradiation at 7 angles
Transversal view
sagittal view
Laser-accelerated electrons can provide a better dose sparing of critical
structures (up to 19%) at a similar target coverage compared to photons.
Applications for material science :
γ
radiography
50 μm γ source size 2010
400 μm γ source size 2005
Conclusions
Good beam quality & Monoenergetic dE/E down to 1 %
√
Beam is very stable
√
Energy is tunable: 20-300 MeV
√
Charge is tunable: 1 to tens of pC
√
Energy spread is tunable: 1 to 10 %
√
Ultra short e-bunch : 1,5 fs rms √
Ultra high current e-bunch : 3-4 kA √
Results extremely important for :
Designing future accelerators
Light source development for XFEL
and for applications (chemistry, radiotherapy, material science)
T T T . . TT T T . T T T T T . T T T . . . T . .. .T . . . T T T
Laser Plasma Accelerator : a Wonderful Tool for Science
and for Academic Activities
Acknowledgements
CARE/FP6-Euroleap/FP6-Accel1/ANR-PARIS/ERC contracts
A. Ben Ismail, S. Corde, J. Faure, S. Fritzler, Y. Glinec, A.
Lifshitz, J. Lim, O. Lundh, C. Rechatin, Kim Ta Phuoc, and C.
Thaury from LOA