R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Boundedness character of a fourth-order
system of difference equations
Stevo Stevi´c
1,2*, Bratislav Iriˇcanin
3and Zden ˇek Šmarda
4,5*Correspondence: [email protected]
1Mathematical Institute of the
Serbian Academy of Sciences, Knez Mihailova 36/III, Beograd, 11000, Serbia
2Operator Theory and Applications
Research Group, Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
The boundedness character of positive solutions of the following system of difference equations:xn+1=A+ y
p n
xrn–3,yn+1=A+ xpn
ynr–3,n∈N0, when min{A,r}> 0 andp≥0, is
studied.
MSC: Primary 39A10; 39A20
Keywords: system of difference equations; bounded solutions; unbounded solutions; positive solutions
1 Introduction
Concrete nonlinear difference equations and systems, especially those which are not closely related to differential ones, have attracted a lot of attention recently (see, for example, [–] and the references therein). Among them, symmetric and close to symmetric systems of difference equations, whose study was essentially initiated by Papaschinopoulos and Schinas in the mid-s, have attracted a considerable interest (see, for example, [, –, , , –]). For example, in [] Papaschinopoulos and Schinas studied the oscillatory behavior, the boundedness character, and the global sta-bility of positive solutions of the following close to symmetric system of difference equa-tions:
xn+=A+
yn xn–p
, yn+=A+
xn yn–q
, n∈N,
whereA> andp,q∈N. It should be noted that the system is rational. On the other hand, for the casep=qthe system obviously becomes symmetric, that is, it is of the following form:
xn=f(xn–k,yn–l), yn=f(yn–k,xn–l), n∈N,
for somek,l∈N.
On the other hand, a systematic study of positive solutions of nonlinear difference equa-tions containing non-integer powers of their dependent variables began by Stevićet al., approximately since the publication of [], where the first nontrivial results related to the
following difference equation were given:
xn+=α+
xpn– xpn
, n∈N, ()
wheremin{α,p}> .
A good prototype including () is the following difference equation:
xn=α+x
p n–k xr
n–l
, n∈N, ()
wherek,l∈N,k=l,min{α,r}> , andp≥, which was proposed for studying by Stević at numerous talks. Some special cases of this, the corresponding max-type difference equa-tion or related equaequa-tions has been studied considerably (see, for example, [, , , , –, , ] and the references therein).
Motivated by these two lines of investigations Stević has proposed recently studying symmetric and close to symmetric systems of difference equations which, among others, stem from special cases of ().
Motivated by all above mentioned work, and especially by [], here we investigate the boundedness character of the solutions of the next system of difference equations
xn+=A+
ypn xr
n–
, yn+=A+
xpn yr
n–
, n∈N, ()
whenmin{A,r}> ,p≥, andx–i,y–i> ,i∈ {, , , }. Our results extend and
comple-ment some results in [].
By using the induction and the equations in () we see that ifx–i,y–i> ,i∈ {, , , },
then
min{xn,yn}> , n≥–,
which means that positive initial values generate positive solutions of system (). More-over, we have
min{xn,yn}>A, n∈N. ()
The casep= is simple. Namely, in this case by using () into () is obtained
max{xn+,yn+}<A+
Ar, n≥,
which means that all positive solutions of system () in this case are bounded. In fact, since
A<min{xn,yn} ≤max{xn,yn}<A+
Ar, n≥,
they are persistent.
For a solution (xn,yn)n≥–of system () it is said that it isunboundedif
sup
n≥–
(xn,yn)R=sup n≥–
x
Otherwise, the solution isbounded, that is, if there is a nonnegative constantMsuch that
sup
n≥–
(xn,yn)R≤M< +∞.
2 Main results
In this section we prove the main results in this paper, all of which are related to the bound-edness character, that is, the boundbound-edness of all positive solutions of system () or the ex-istence of an unbounded solution of the system depending on the values of parametersA,
p, andr.
Theorem Assume thatmin{A,p,r}> andp< r.Then all positive solutions of
system()are bounded.
Proof Using the equations in (), we have
Now using the first equation in () in () we get
Assume that for somek≥ we have proved that the following equalities hold:
xn+=A+
where the sequencesak,bk, andckare defined by
ak+=
Using again the equations in () and the recurrent relations in (), we have
=A+
From this and by using recurrent relations (), it follows thatak,bk, andck increase, as far asak<p. On the other hand, () implies
and thatx∗is a solution of the equation
f(x) =x(p–x)–r= .
We havef() =f(p) = –randf (x) = (x–p)(p– x). Hencemax
x∈[,p]f(x) =f(p/). Since
by a condition of the theorem
f(p/) =p
–r< ,
This guarantees the existence of the smallestl∈Nsuch thatal–<pandal≥p. This,
of system () the boundedness of yn follows and consequently the boundedness of the
solution. Ifl= k– , then from () it follows that
Due to the symmetry of system () we also have
yn+≤A+
forn≥k+ , which along with the previous inequality implies the boundedness of the
solution.
forn≥, from which the boundedness follows in the case. Due to the symmetry of system () we see that the inequality
holds forn≥, from which along with the previous inequality the boundedness of the
solution follows.
Remark Note that ifak=pfor somek∈N, thenak+,bk+, andck+are not defined.
However, if this happens then above mentioned indexlis chosen to be thisk. For such chosenlis obtained an upper bound for positive solutions of system () in the way de-scribed in the proof of Theorem .
Theorem Assume thatmin{A,p,r}> , p≥r,and p≥/ (where at least one of
these two inequalities is strict),or r<p– < /.Then system()has positive unbounded solutions.
Proof Assume that (xn,yn)n≥–is a positive solution of (). Then we have
xn+≥
ypn xr
n–
, ()
yn+≥
xpn
yrn–, ()
forn∈N. Let
zn=ln(xnyn), n≥–.
Taking the logarithm of the both sides in (), (), then summing such obtained inequal-ities, it follows that
zn+–pzn+rzn–≥, n∈N. ()
Let
P(λ) =λ–pλ+r. ()
ThenP() =rand
P(λ) =λ(λ– p),
from which it follows that the polynomialP(λ) has a local minimum atλ= p/, and ac-cording to the conditions of the theorem
P(p/) = –p/ +r≤. ()
Ifp> /, then p/ > . From this, () and since
lim
λ→+∞P(λ) = +∞, ()
it follows that there isλ> such thatP(λ) = . Ifp= /, inequality () is strict, p/ = ,
Now assume thatr<p– < /. ThenP() = –p+r< and since () holds, we again see that there isλ> such thatP(λ) = .
Let
P(λ) =P(λ)/(λ–λ) =λ+aλ+bλ+c
and
un=zn+azn–+bzn–+czn–.
Then inequality () can be written in the following form:
un+–λun≥. ()
Choosex–i,y–i,i∈ {, , , }, such thatu> . For example, to getu> , it is enough to
choosex–i,y–i,i∈ {, , , }, such that
xy>|a||x–y–|+|b||x–y–|+|c||x–y–|.
From this and () it follows that
un≥λnu. ()
Sinceu> andλ> , by lettingn→ ∞in () we obtainun→+∞asn→ ∞. Ifzn
were bounded thenunwould be also bounded, which would be a contradiction. Hencezn
is unbounded. From this and since
x
n+yn≥xnyn= ezn, n∈N,
we have
sup
n≥–
x
n+yn= +∞,
that is, the solution of system () is unbounded, completing the proof of the theorem.
Theorem Assume thatmin{A,p,r}> and p=r+ .Then system()has positive
un-bounded solutions.
Proof Let
xy>x–y–>x–y–>x–y–> . ()
Sincep=r+ , system () is
xn+=A+
yrn+ xr
n–
, yn+=A+
xrn+ yr
n–
Multiplying these two equations we easily obtain
xn+yn+
xnyn >
xnyn xn–yn–
r
, ()
from which withn= , it follows that
xy
xy
>
xy
x–y– r
> .
Assume that we have proved
xkyk>xk–yk–, for –≤k≤n. ()
Then from () and () we have
xn+yn+
xnyn
>
xnyn xn–yn–
r
> , n∈N. ()
Hence
xn+yn+>xnyn,
for every n ≥ –. If xnyn was bounded, then there would be a finite positive limn→∞xnyn=c. Lettingn→ ∞in the product of equations in () we would obtain
c≥A+c, which would be a contradiction. Hence, all the solutions of () satisfying ()
are unbounded.
Theorem Assume thatmin{A,r}> and p∈(, ).Then every positive solution of system
()is bounded.
Proof Sincexn>A,n∈N, we have
xn+≤A+
ypn
Ar, yn+≤A+
xpn Ar,
forn≥, where (xn,yn)n≥–is an arbitrary positive solution of system ().
Hence
xn++yn+≤A+
(xn+yn)p
Ar , ()
forn≥.
Let (zn)n≥be the solution of the equation
zn+= A+
zpn
Ar, n≥, ()
such thatz=x+y.
Since
f(x) = A+x
p
is increasing onR+, a simple inductive argument shows that
xn+yn≤zn, forn≥. ()
Sincep∈(, ) functionf is concave, which implies that there is a unique fixed pointx∗
off and that the next condition
f(x) –x x–x∗ < , x∈(,∞)\x∗, ()
holds.
Ifz∈(,x∗] condition () implies that (zn)n≥is nondecreasing and bounded above
by x∗, and ifz≥x∗ that it is nonincreasing and bounded below byx∗. Hence (zn)n≥
is bounded, which along with () implies the boundedness of (xn)n≥and (yn)n≥, from
which the result easily follows.
In the next theorem we use the fact that the comparison equation is a linear first order difference equation, which is solvable in closed form. For recent application of this and related equations see, for example, [, , , –, ].
Theorem Assume that p= ,r> ,and A>√r.Then every positive solution of system
()is bounded.
Proof From the proof of Theorem we see that any positive solution (xn,yn)n≥–of system
() satisfies () withp= .
Let (zn)n≥be the solution of the equation
zn+= A+
zn
Ar, n≥, ()
such thatz=x+y. Then clearly () also holds.
It is well known that () is solvable. Using its solution in closed form is easily proved that
lim
n→∞zn=
Ar+
Ar– ,
from which the boundedness of (zn)n≥ follows. This fact along with () implies the
boundedness of (xn)n≥and (yn)n≥, from which the result easily follows.
Remark The boundedness character of positive solutions of system () in the following two cases:
(a) r≤p/, <p<r+ ,r< /;
(b) r≤p/,p= ,A∈(,√r ],
is not known to us. Hence, we leave the cases to the interested reader.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Author details
1Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences, Knez Mihailova 36/III, Beograd, 11000, Serbia.2Operator
Theory and Applications Research Group, Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia. 3Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Belgrade University, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73, Beograd, 11000, Serbia.4CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, Brno, 616 00, Czech Republic.5Department of Mathematics, FEEC - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, Brno, 616 00, Czech Republic.
Acknowledgements
The work of Stevo Stevi´c is supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education and Science projects III 41025 and III 44006. The work of Bratislav Iriˇcanin is supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education and Science projects III 41025 and OI 171007. The work of Zden ˇek Šmarda was realized in CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology with research infrastructure supported by the project CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068 financed from European Regional Development Fund. He was also supported by the project FEKT-S-14-2200 of Brno University of Technology.
Received: 27 July 2015 Accepted: 23 September 2015 References
1. Berenhaut, K, Foley, J, Stevi´c, S: The global attractivity of the rational difference equationyn= 1 + (yn–k/yn–m). Proc. Am.
Math. Soc.135(1), 1133-1140 (2007)
2. Berenhaut, K, Stevi´c, S: The behaviour of the positive solutions of the difference equationxn=A+ (xn–2/xn–1)p. J. Differ. Equ. Appl.12(9), 909-918 (2006)
3. Berezansky, L, Braverman, E: On impulsive Beverton-Holt difference equations and their applications. J. Differ. Equ. Appl.10(9), 851-868 (2004)
4. Berg, L, Stevi´c, S: On some systems of difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.218, 1713-1718 (2011)
5. Iriˇcanin, B, Stevi´c, S: On a class of third-order nonlinear difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.213, 479-483 (2009) 6. Karakostas, GL: Asymptotic 2-periodic difference equations with diagonally self-invertible responses. J. Differ. Equ.
Appl.6, 329-335 (2000)
7. Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, CJ: On a system of two nonlinear difference equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.219(2), 415-426 (1998)
8. Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, CJ: On the behavior of the solutions of a system of two nonlinear difference equations. Commun. Appl. Nonlinear Anal.5(2), 47-59 (1998)
9. Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, CJ: Invariants for systems of two nonlinear difference equations. Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst.
7(2), 181-196 (1999)
10. Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, CJ: Invariants and oscillation for systems of two nonlinear difference equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA46(7), 967-978 (2001)
11. Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, CJ: On the dynamics of two exponential type systems of difference equations. Comput. Math. Appl.64(7), 2326-2334 (2012)
12. Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, CJ, Stefanidou, G: On the nonautonomous difference equationxn+1=An+ (x p n–1/x
q n).
Appl. Math. Comput.217, 5573-5580 (2011)
13. Stefanidou, G, Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, C: On a system of max difference equations. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst., Ser. A14(6), 885-903 (2007)
14. Stefanidou, G, Papaschinopoulos, G, Schinas, C: On a system of two exponential type difference equations. Commun. Appl. Nonlinear Anal.17(2), 1-13 (2010)
15. Stevi´c, S: On the recursive sequencexn+1=α+ (xpn–1/x p
n). J. Appl. Math. Comput.18(1-2), 229-234 (2005)
16. Stevi´c, S: On the recursive sequencexn+1=A+ (xnp/xnr–1). Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc.2007, Article ID 40963 (2007) 17. Stevi´c, S: On the recursive sequencexn+1= max{c,xnp/xpn–1}. Appl. Math. Lett.21(8), 791-796 (2008) 18. Stevi´c, S: Boundedness character of a class of difference equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA70, 839-848 (2009) 19. Stevi´c, S: Boundedness character of a fourth order nonlinear difference equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals40,
2364-2369 (2009)
20. Stevi´c, S: On a generalized max-type difference equation from automatic control theory. Nonlinear Anal. TMA72, 1841-1849 (2010)
21. Stevi´c, S: On a nonlinear generalized max-type difference equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl.376, 317-328 (2011) 22. Stevi´c, S: On a solvable rational system of difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.219, 2896-2908 (2012) 23. Stevi´c, S: On a third-order system of difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.218, 7649-7654 (2012)
24. Stevi´c, S: On some periodic systems of max-type difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.218, 11483-11487 (2012) 25. Stevi´c, S: Solutions of a max-type system of difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.218, 9825-9830 (2012) 26. Stevi´c, S: Domains of undefinable solutions of some equations and systems of difference equations. Appl. Math.
Comput.219, 11206-11213 (2013)
27. Stevi´c, S: Representation of solutions of bilinear difference equations in terms of generalized Fibonacci sequences. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.2014, Article No. 67 (2014)
28. Stevi´c, S, Alghamdi, MA, Alotaibi, A, Elsayed, EM: Solvable product-type system of difference equations of second order. Electron. J. Differ. Equ.2015, Article No. 169 (2015)
29. Stevi´c, S, Alghamdi, MA, Alotaibi, A, Shahzad, N: On a higher-order system of difference equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.2013, Article No. 47 (2013)
30. Stevi´c, S, Alghamdi, MA, Alotaibi, A, Shahzad, N: On a nonlinear second order system of difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.219, 11388-11394 (2013)
31. Stevi´c, S, Alghamdi, MA, Alotaibi, A, Shahzad, N: Long-term behavior of positive solutions of a system of max-type difference equations. Appl. Math. Comput.235, 567-574 (2014)
32. Stevi´c, S, Alghamdi, MA, Alotaibi, A, Shahzad, N: Boundedness character of a max-type system of difference equations of second order. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.2014, Article No. 45 (2014)