• No results found

The Impact of an Entrepreneurship Training Course on the Development of Entrepreneurial Features

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The Impact of an Entrepreneurship Training Course on the Development of Entrepreneurial Features"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN 2286-4822 www.euacademic.org

Impact Factor: 3.1 (UIF) DRJI Value: 5.9 (B+)

The Impact of an Entrepreneurship Training

Course on the Development of Entrepreneurial

Features

BEHDAD KHALILI

Sharif University of Technology Iran

FARSHAD TOJARI

Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch Iran

MONA REZAEI

Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch Iran

Abstract:

(2)

Key words: entrepreneurship training, entrepreneurial features, sport experts

Introduction

(3)

for the purpose of facilitating students’ abilities and changing into entrepreneurs (unicef, 2003). The present research attempts to examine the effects of training course on the development of entrepreneurial behavior with providing a training course although short, in addition to showing the significance of subject and entrepreneurship subjects in sport experts’ opinion.

Methodology

(4)

Findings

Table 1. shows the distribution of individuals’ demographic features. As you observe, testable individuals in the verbal group are younger and they are mostly single and jobless.

Table 1. Testable participants’ features of the research

Maximum Minimum Standard

deviation average Number Indicator Feature

2 1 0.51 1.50 20 Control

2 1 0.51 1.50 20 nonverbal Sex 1

2 1 0.51 1.43 20 Verbal

4 1 1.09 2.60 20 Control

4 1 0.82 2.40 20 Nonverbal Age2

3 1 0.54 1.18 20 Verbal

2 1 0.51 1.50 20 Control

2 1 0.47 1.70 20 Nonverbal Marriage3

2 1 0.25 1.06 20 Verbal

2 1 0.22 1.05 20 Control

2 1 0.44 1.25 20 Nonverbal Occupation4

2 1 0.50 1.62 20 Verbal

3 1 o.89 1.63 20 Control

3 1 0.61 1.41 20 nonverbal Place or

service5

3 1 0.63 2.00 20 Verbal

1. Female (1), Male (2). 2. 20 – 24 years old ( 1 ), 25 – 29 years old (2), 30 – 35 years old (3) , upper than 35 years old (4) . 3. Single (1), married (2). 4. Employed (1), jobless (2). 5. Public sector (1), private sector (2), free sector (3).

Table 2. Statistical results in relation to variants Levin’s

pursuant test

P df F M±SD Statistical indicator

variable

Sig Levin

0.238 1.47 0.002 2 6.9 3.7±0.42 Intelligence 0.610 0.499 0.003 2 6.29 3.790±0.271 Entrepreneurship 0.314 1.18 0.013 2 4.703 3.75±0.38 Creativity 0.190 1.709 0.008 2 5.298 3.99±0.41 Self – confidence 0.236 1.436 0.729 2 0.319 3.376±0.432 Decision – making 0.091 2.49 0.825 2 0.193 3.4±0.4 Decisiveness 0.001 8.349 0.003 2 6.44 3.71±0.42 Risk – taking

0.001 0.832 0.28 2 3.81 0.375±0.41 Need for

(5)

Table 2. shows the statistical results in relation to variants. According to variants analysis results, decision–making, decisiveness, need for improvement variants for verbal experiential, nonverbal experiential and control groups did not have meaningful difference and the rest of variants had meaningful difference in significance level (0.05) .Also the results of Levin’s test showed that except for risking test and need for improvement, the rest of variants had meaningful difference.

Discussion and Conclusion

(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

(p≤0.05). Martinez et al (2007) recognized some correlated factors with entrepreneurship development among the students of the graduate school of agriculture and natural resources faculty in a research and concluded that the students’ features of seeking success, creativity, innovation, risk–taking, determining destiny and independence have positive and meaningful relation with development of entrepreneurship variant. The findings of this research are in agreement with that of Ekinsmyth (2011), Addario et al (2010) and Lordkipanidze et al (2005).

Although it is possible that entrepreneurship training course was held in a short time, and it was not effective in some variants, but participant’s entrepreneurial features which were a set of various variants, were changed and this shows the effect of training in this case.

REFERENCES:

Addario. S.D, Vuri. D, (2010), “Entrepreneurship and Market Size. The Case of Young College Graduates in Italy”, Journal of Labour Economics, Vol.17, PP: 848–858. Ali. A, Topping. K.J, Tariq R.H., (2011), “Entrepreneurial

Attitudes among Potential Entrepreneurs”, Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. Vol. 5, No.1, PP: 12-46.

Bahadur. P, (2012), “Entrepreneurship Education in India A Perspective”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

Berglund. H, Yar Hamidi. D, Wennberg. K, (2008), “Creativity in entrepreneurship education”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 15, No. 2, PP: 304-320.

(10)

Chang. S, Gong. Y, Shum. C, (2011), “Promoting innovation in hospitality companies through human resource management practices”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol.30, PP: 812– 818.

Chirisman. J, Kellmanns. W, (2008), “Management Journals as Venues for Publication of Family Business Research”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.32, No.5, PP: 927–934.

Chirsman. J.J, Sharma. P, (2005), “Terends and Directions in the Developmentary of a Strategic Management: Theory of the Family Firm”, Journal of Entreprenuership Theory Practice, Vol. 29, No.3, PP: 555-576.

Chiu. R, (2012), “Entrepreneurship Education in the Nordic Countries Strategy Implementation and Good Practices, Unpublished Master Thesis.

Ekinsmyth. C, (2011), “Challenging the Boundaries of Entrepreneurship: The Spatialities and Practices of UK ‘Mumpreneurs”, Journal of Geoforum, Vol.42, PP: 104– 114.

Gharakhani. D, Pourghafar. A, Nasiri. R, Farahmandian. A, (2013), “Entrepreneurship perceptions and the Concept of World Class Manufacturing”, Journal of American Science, Vol.9, No.1s, PP: 124-128.

Jones. M.S, Coviello. N & Tang. Y, (2011), “International Entrepreneurship Research (1989 – 2009): A Domain Ontology and Thematic Analysis”. Journal of Business Venturing, PP: 632-659.

Josoh. R, Ziyae. B, Asimiran. S & Kadir. S, (2011). “Entrepreneur Training Needs Analysis: Implications on the Entrepreneurial Skills Needed for Successful Entrepreneurs”. International Business & Economics Research Journal, PP: 143-150.

(11)

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 28, No.3, PP: 209-28.

Khayri. S, Yaghoubi. J & Yazdanpanah. M, (2011), “Investigating Barriers to Enhance Entrepreneurship in Agricultural Higher Education from the Perspective of Graduate Students”. Journal of Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 15, PP: 2818–2822.

Kurat Ko.D.F, (2005). “The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends and challenges”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 29, No.5, PP: 577–597.

Lashgarar. F, Roshani. N, Najafabadi. M.O, (2011), “Influencing factors on entrepreneurial skills of rural women in Ilam City, Iran”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5, No.14, PP: 5536-5540.

Lordkipanidze. M, Brezet. H, Backman. M, (2005), “The Entrepreneurship Factor in Sustainable Tourism Development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.13, PP: 787-798.

Martinez, Mora & Silva, (2007), “The Existence of NonElite Private Schools”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.90, No. 8-9, PP: 1505-1518.

McClelland. D, (1962), “Achievement Motivation Can Be Developed”, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

McGehee. N.C, Kim. K, Jennings. G.R, (2007), “Gender and motivation for agri-tourism entrepreneurship”, Journal of Tourism Management Vol.28, PP: 280–289.

Murah. M.Z, Abdullah. Z, (2012), “An Experience in Transforming Teaching and Learning Practices in Technology Entrepreneurship Course”, Journal of Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.59, PP: 164 – 169.

(12)

Nilsson. T, (2012), “Entrepreneurship Education–Does It Matter?” International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 7, No. 13, PP: 40-48.

Othman. N, Ismail. R, (2012), “Impact of Globalization on Trends in Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Education Institutions”, International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, Vol. 3, No. 4, PP: 267-271. Ramraini, A.H, (2012), “Predictors towards Entrepreneurial

Intention: A Malaysian Case Study”, Journal of Business and Management Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 11, PP: 1-10. Raposo. M, & Do paco. A, (2011), “Entrepreneurship education:

Relationship between Education and Entrepreneurial Activity”. Psicothema, PP: 453-457.

Rasheed. H.s, (2011). “Developing Entrepreneurial Characteristics in Youth: The Effects of Education and Enterprise Experience”, Unpublished Thesis, University of South Florida.

Siswanto. A, Margono. S, Umar. N, (2013), “Entrepreneurial Motivation in Pondok Pesantren”, International Journal of Business and Behavioral scieness. Vol. 3, no. 2, PP: 28-40.

Figure

Table 2. Statistical results in relation to variants

References

Related documents

8.2 The merchant agrees to indemnify PAYMILL in the internal relationship from all possible claims of third parties based on illegal or uncontractual acts of the merchant or

Passed time until complete analysis result was obtained with regard to 4 separate isolation and identification methods which are discussed under this study is as

First FRCR Final FRCR Part A Final FRCR Part B Final FRCR Part B Final FRCR Part B CORE TRAINING BREAST RADIOLOGY DOPS CbD Mini- CEX DADRS Patient questionnaire

Deviating from the clear-cut cases of Waste Management, Enron, and American International Group, the bankruptcy and accounting scandal of Lehman Brothers is not as straightforward

Our analysis expressed that if the effect of rotation parameter is viewed, the action of the tunneling boson particles on the event horizon will be different from the real

Firms are towards the graduates starting their employment more generous in the course of the fi rst three years, with respect to both the level of salaries and salary

There is a need for the government to improve the free basic healthcare programme by improving the quality and coverage of health services and medicines and this study suggests that