Packaging Solution using IGR Methoprene for Insect Control
•
Commercially available Technology
•
Test Data from Lab and Field Studies
•
Objective: Reduction in use of fumigants and
IGR
(Insect Growth Regulator)
X
X
X
Methoprene is used extensively in Integrated Pest Management Programs
Adult
Pupa
Feed Products
Purina Brand markets a “Feed-through” for Beef Cattle and Horses to control fly populations in feedlots
Grain Storage
Diacon(Central Garden and Pet)- Markets a powdered additive to grain bins during harvest and transfer for insect control
Pet Flea and Tick Treatments
Applied to pets to control fleas and ticks in Neck applications and collars
Food Manufacturing Facility
Fogging solutions in warehouses and plants to control insect populations
Commercially Available Products
Film/Woven Packaging Solution
PGT IGR 30000 Film Integration Additive
•Liquid additive to film making process • Combines and resides in films
• Manually combines with Pellets • Can be metered directly in extruder • Fully Compliant w/ all regulatory agencies
• No Odor or Taste • Adds insect control
Paper Packaging Solution
PGT 23207 Water Based Coating
•Clear water based topcoat
• Typically printed over graphic images • Replaces existing coatings
• Duplicates existing coating in
COF Gloss
Rub Resistance
• Fully Compliant w/ all regulatory
agencies
• Adds insect control Controls for over
FDA Status
ProvisionGardTM complies with FDA requirements for Food, Feed & Tobacco
packaging EPA Status
ProvisionGard™ is registered with the EPA (registration # 81390-1) CONEG (Coalition of Northeastern Governors)
ProvisionGard™ complies with the requirements of the toxics in packaging law(s)
Test Results
All data generated using USDA
Protocols and trained Entomologists
.
Evaluation of ProvisionGard for Control of Flour
Beetles and Indian Meal Moth in Paper and
Woven Poly Bags
Go to
www.pvgard.com
to watch video
Jade Vardeman
Research Entomologist
Moses Biologic, LLC
Treated vs Untreated Cartons with Water Based Coating
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 Ins e c t C ount Shipper Number ProvisionGard Study Breakfast Cereal CartonsSeptember 2009
PG Treated Control
Rice Packaged in Treated Cartons and Treated Corrugate Boxes
CBR Cartons (18 cartons/shipper) Control Treated Total # of shippers 14 10 Total # of insects 329 0 Average # insects/shipper 23.5 0.0
Range of insect count/shipper 0 – 132 0 – 0
Average reduction in
treated vs. control 100% efficacy
Brown Rice Cartons (18 cartons/shipper)
Control Treated
Total # of shippers 8 11
Total # of insects 60 5
Average # insects/shipper 7.5 0.5
Range of insect count/shipper 0 – 37 0 – 3
Average reduction in
treated vs. control 93.4% efficacy
CBR Poly (6 bags/shipper) In Corrugate Boxes
Control Treated Total # of Shippers 28 28 Total # of Insects 182 3 Average # of insects/shipper 6.5 0.1
Range of insect count/shipper 2 – 13 0 – 1
Average Reduction in Treated vs. Control 99% efficacy
Whole Grain 5# Poly (12 bags/shipper)in Corrugate Box
Control Treated Total # of Shippers 10 15 Total # of Insects 95 0 Average # of insects/shipper 9.5 0
Range of insect count/shipper
1– 23 0 – 0
Average Reduction in
Treated vs. Control
“Blinded” Pet Food: Multiwall Bags
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111 121 Treated In s ec t CountBag Number Control
Evaluation of ProvisionGard for
Control of Flour Beetles
Packaging- Film Woven Poly
Dr. Frank Arthur
Research Entomologist
USDA-ARS-CGAHR
Manhattan, KS 66502
Methods-Test 1
• Circular disks of packaging cut to fit bottom portion of a 9.6 in2 plastic Petri dish • Disks with inner and outer portions of the packaging
• Ten 4-week old red flour beetle larvae or ten confused flour beetle larvae of same age put in separate dishes with 300 mg flour
Results to Date
• Confused flour beetle the more tolerant of the two species (consistent with other studies) • Outer portion still active after 8 months
• Inner portion losing efficacy
Inner Outer Month 0 5.0 ± 2.0 0.0 ± 0.0 Month 2 3.3 ± 2.1 1.6 ± 1.6 Month 4 23.3 ± 3.3 5.0 ± 3.4 Month 6? 66.7 ± 21.1 6.7 ± 3.3 Month 8 30.0 ± 12. 1 0.0 ± 0.0 • Conclusions
% Emergence-Red Flour Beetle
Inner Outer Month 0 41.7 ± 14.7 6.7 ± 6.7 Month 2 81.7 ± 9.0 5.0 ± 3.4 Month 4 90.0 ± 5.7 40.0 ± 8.1? Month 6 83.3 ± 4.2 1.7 ± 1.7 Month 8 93.3 ± 3.3 15.0 ± 6.1
Field Applications Data
• Bartlett Milling reports a 90% reduction in returns the first Year.
• Mars Food reports a 100% elimination of returns due to insect damage in 2011 for corrugated bulk shipments. Normally 4-5 truckloads are returned annually.
• Southern States reports no incidents of insect damage in packaged seed products for 2011.
ProvisionGard
TM
Test Results
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 In sect s p er S h ip p er Shipper Number No Column represents Zero InsectsProvisionGard
Pet Food Multiwall -
90 Day Field Study- SOS Bag
Pet Food SOS Bags Fort Worth Texas Distribution Center
Control Treated
Total # of Shippers 41 41
Total # of Insects 58 3 Average # of insects/shipper 1.4 0.07
Range of insect count/shipper 2 – 16 0 – 1