• No results found

Presentation Overview

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Presentation Overview"

Copied!
38
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

S

(2)

Presentation Overview

 Why braided curriculum?

 SafeCare Overview

 Development of PATSCH  Project Overview

 Preliminary Data & Provider Feedback  Safety & Health Modules

(3)

Audience Poll

How many of you deliver more than one program or

model to your families?

(4)

PATSCH

 Parents as Teachers + SafeCare® at Home

 Randomized Controlled Trial funded by Annie E. Casey

Foundation

 Research question: Does combining PAT and SafeCare

result in better outcomes for families?

 Examining parenting outcomes, child developmental

outcomes, school readiness and overall risk for child maltreatment

(5)

Development of PATSCH

No panaceas

Need for collaboration

Georgia PAT Leader approaches SafeCare

PATSCH is proposed & created

(6)

SafeCare

Parent training program

Birth to 5

Focuses on

 Parent-child and parent-infant interaction  Child health

(7)

SafeCare Modules

Parent-Infant Interaction (0 – walking) Developmental milestones Bonding skills Parent-Child Interaction (walking – 5) Developmental milestones Planned Activities Training Home Safety Identifying hazards Removing hazards Child Health Heath recording chart Symptom and Illness Guide

(8)
(9)

Braiding

 Braiding - not altering the integrity of either curriculum,

but combining them in a unique way to create a new program

 Essential to keep requirements of both programs

 SafeCare visit fidelity

 PAT visit essential requirements

(10)

Sessions

Session 1 [SafeCare only] • Baseline Assessment • Training Session 2 [Braided] • Training Session 3 [SafeCare only] • Training Session 4 [Braided] • Training • End-of-Module Assessment

(11)

PATSCH Tool Kit

Use of Familiar Symbols

PAT language and components

(12)

Color-coded information

(13)

Typical SafeCare outline format Specific PAT handouts Detailed session outline to reduce Parent Educator preparation time

(14)

The Study

Randomization at site level

3 states

6 PATSCH sites

7 control sites

(15)

Eligibility Criteria

 Completed 5 PAT Foundational Visits  Target child under age 4

 Meet at least 2 high-risk criteria

 Single parent  Teen parent  Low income

 Low education level

(16)

Research Assessments

Every family complete 3 research assessments

 Baseline (enrollment)

 6-months post-enrollment  12-months post-enrollment

(17)

Study Measures

 ACASI

 Child development measures

 Parent measures

 Parent-Child Interaction Videos

 KIPS

 PICCOLO

 Environmental Scan Videos

 Home Accident Prevention

Inventory (HAPI)

 PAT Data

 Process measures

 Demographics & service data

 PATSCH Data

(18)

The Numbers

Control Site State # Enrolled

Child Development Association

GA 7

Prevent Child Abuse Habersham

GA 11

Sheltering Arms GA 7 Catawba County

Schools Early Head Start

NC 27

Easter Seals UCP North Carolina

NC 19

Jackson County Family Resource Center NC 1 Marlboro County School District SC 6 McCormick County Even Start Family Literacy Program

SC 14

TOTAL 91

Implementation Site State # Enrolled

Community Partnership of Elbert County

GA 12

Rockingham County Partnership for Children

NC 9

Kids Advocacy Resource Effort (KARE)

NC 8

Children & Family Resource Center

NC 7

Sampson County

Partnership for Children NC

NC 12

Beaufort-Hyde

Partnership for Children

NC 5

First Steps Parents as Teachers – District 4 of Lexington County SC 12 ParentSmart/Rock Hill School District 3 SC 2 TOTAL 67 TOTAL N = 159

(19)

Project Status

 Current year: 5

 Enrollment complete

 Delivery of PATSCH almost complete

 6-month assessments complete December 2015  12-month assessments complete June 2016

(20)

Baseline Demographics

Gender Female 145 Male 3 Participant Age Mean = 28 Range: 15 - 65 n (%) Latino Yes 53 (35.33%) No 95 (63.33%) n (%) Race White 52 (35.14%) Black 47 (31.76%) Asian/Pacific Islander 10 (6.76%) Other 34 (22.97%)

(21)

Baseline Demographics

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

1 child 2 children 3 children 4 children 5+ children

#

of

famili

es

(22)

Baseline Demographics

Employed Yes No 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 $0 - $4,999 $5,000 -$9,999 $10,000 -$14,999 $15,000 -$24,999 $25,000 + # of famili es

(23)

Baseline Demographics

46.62

29.73 14.86

8.78

Highest Completed Level of Education

< HS HS Graduate/GED

Some College College Grad (assoc. degree +)

31.08

64.86

4.06

Marital Status

Single

Married or Living with Partner Separated/Divorced/Widowed

(24)

Parent Educator Surveys

 Online survey  Parent educators

 Trained in PATSCH  Delivered PATSCH

 Feedback on curriculum & implementation

 Own opinion

(25)

How well, overall, did families like each module? (If you

never delivered a particular module, mark as N/A)

(26)

Please select how well, overall, you, as a provider,

liked each module. (If you never delivered a module,

mark as N/A)

(27)

Home Safety

 Identify and remove safety

hazards in home

 Evaluate 3 rooms  Train parent

(28)

Preliminary Data

 Safety

 Modest correlation between # of hazards and child abuse potential  Brief Child Abuse Potential (BCAP)

 n = 89

 mean = 4.12

 Home Accident Prevention Inventory (HAPI)

 n = 75

(29)

Child Health

 Sick or Injured Child Chart

 Identify symptoms  Decide what to do

 Emergency Room  Call the Doctor  Care at Home

 Symptoms & Illness Guide  Prevention

(30)
(31)
(32)

Overall, how much positive change has

PATSCH made for your families?

(33)

How likely are you to recommend PATSCH to

other providers?

(34)

PATSCH Feedback

Would you like to continue to use some or all

of the PATSCH curriculum?

(35)

If you would like to use some elements of the

PATSCH curriculum, which module(s) would

you still use?

(36)

Sustainability

 PAT & SafeCare National Offices

 The Institute for Innovation & Implementation @

University of Maryland School of Social Work

(37)

Why Braid?

 Systematic and supported implementation of 2

programs together

 Provide best support for high-risk families  Target specific needs of all families

(38)

Katy Miller, M.Ed.

Project Coordinator

Center for Healthy Development School of Public Health

Georgia State University

[email protected]

Kate Guastaferro, MPH

Doctoral Candidate, Research Assistant Center for Healthy Development

School of Public Health Georgia State University

References

Related documents

optimizing the wellbeing of families thru better lifestyle choices... • Transition homes for homeless families and

chatham county school statutory rape of state was in durham county middle school district officials say busch was a meeting with a public school. Gilmore of chatham county nc

Private and guidance personnel team teach and guidance counselor jobs greenville sc jobs greenville county detention center on providing organization, sc school counseling

In the typical group, the emotion facilitation effect (which is the reaction time difference between emotion and neutral words) was not significantly correlated with the verbal IQ

Assuming that the stock index can be characterized by the binomial distribution we show that intraday measurements of volatility are about 3 to 4 times more efficient

KEYWORDS Discontinuous Galerkin scheme; GMRES solver; High order; Implicit Runge–Kutta method; Unsteady flows.. Abstract Efficient solution techniques for high-order temporal and

Afterward, the time-dependent contact angle in fabricated sandstone substrate (RMS roughness

We assume a random matching structure; the proportion of matching between agents with n, j and n , j is equal to µhn, jhn , j , where µ ∈ 0, 1] is exogenously given, and