• No results found

SEC Whistleblower Program

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "SEC Whistleblower Program"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

SEC Whistleblower Program

Presented by:

Karl M. Strait, Partner Jennifer L. Farer, Associate Eric B. Martin, Associate

(2)

SEC Whistleblower Program – Key Features

• SEC may pay rewards to individuals who provide SEC with high-quality tips that lead to successful

enforcement actions relating to past, on-going or

imminent violations of the securities laws.

• Bounties of 10-30% of collected monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million

• Need tips from “those closest to an on-going fraud.” (SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro)

(3)

SEC Whistleblower Program – Key Features

• To receive an award, a whistleblower must …

“Voluntarily provide the SEC with original information

that leads to the successful enforcement by the SEC of a federal court or administrative action in which the SEC obtains monetary sanctions totaling more than $1

million.”

• Whistleblowers may remain anonymous, but must be represented by an attorney and disclose identity before collecting an award

• Anti-retaliation protections apply to whistleblowers whether or not they qualify for an award

(4)

Avoiding unintended consequences . . .

• Seeks to balance need to encourage whistleblowers without promoting unintended consequences.

• Certain kinds of people are not be eligible for awards, e.g.

– people who have duty to report

– Information subject to attorney-client privilege or gained as result of legal representation

– independent public accountants

– officers, directors, trustees or partners who participate in internal compliance process; internal and external

(5)

Avoiding unintended consequences . . .

• Program includes provisions to “discourage employees

from bypassing their own company’s internal compliance programs.”

– Employee whistleblower who first reports internally can preserve “place in line” for SEC award (from date of

internal report) – if employee provides same information to SEC within 120 days.

– Information reported to SEC from the company’s

investigation will be considered when deciding whether to make an award and where the award should fall in the 10% to 30% range

– SEC can consider whether whistleblower participated in, or interfered with, company compliance programs when determining amount of award.

(6)

Concerns

• Provides windfall for whistleblowers

• Little, if any, incentive for internal reporting • Encourages frivolous complaints

(7)

Internal Reporting Policies/Procedures - Design

• Update compliance and ethics programs based on legal developments and the times to ensure that an efficient, comprehensive action plan is in place that can be executed immediately

– 120 days to complete internal process

• Include a robust internal reporting system and incorporate provisions that encourage internal reporting

(8)

Design – cont.

• Ensure that current policies, including confidentiality agreements, do not prohibit protected whistleblowing • Review internal processes for issuing “document

holds”

• Focus efforts on education and training of employees, board members, and personnel

(9)

Internal Reporting Policies/Procedures

-Documentation

• Be prepared to demonstrate compliance efforts both generally and specifically

– Companies’ actions, both before and after reports are received, may be reviewed by the SEC with the benefit of hindsight

• Generally: document programs and process of implementation

• Specifically: make sure to appropriately document responses to each complaint, including the

(10)

Internal Reporting Policies/Procedures

-Implementation

• Cultivate a culture that emphasizes legal and

regulatory compliance and ethical conduct and that encourages employees to report internally

• Bolster internal auditing and monitoring

• Engage in on-going oversight and review of the corporate compliance program at the board level • Maintain open lines of communication

• Underscore the company’s anti-retaliation policies • Take all reports, even anonymous tips, seriously and

act on them

(11)

Do’s and Don’ts for Responding to

Whistleblowers

• Expect increase in whistleblower claims

• Expect corresponding increase in retaliation claims • Prepare now

(12)

Do’s and Don’ts for Responding to

Whistleblowers

• Strengthen HR best practices • Take proactive steps

(13)

Strengthen HR Best Practices

• Detailed, accurate performance records

• Strong, clearly communicated non-retaliation policy • Surveys and exit interviews

(14)

Take Proactive Steps

• Institute whistleblowing policy

• Reward compliance and reporting • Train HR and Auditors

(15)

Handle Whistleblowers Properly

• Treat all reports seriously

– investigate – report back

• Involve HR, Legal, and Senior Management • Consider neutral investigator

• Actively prevent retaliation

(16)

Resources

• SEC Office of the Whistleblower

(http://www.sec.gov/whistleblower)

• The Rules for Whistleblowers: Significant Aspects of the SEC’s Whistleblower Incentives and Protection Program

(

http://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/publications/rules-for-whistleblowers.pdf)

• Department of Labor Ruling Significantly Broadens Whistleblower Protections

(

http://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/item.asp?item=6000)

• Event Archive: Whistleblowers & Corporate Fraud Investigations (

(17)

For More Information, Contact:

Karl M. Strait, Partner One James Center 901 East Cary Street

Richmond, VA 23219-4030 804.775.1133

kstrait@mcguirewoods.com

Eric B. Martin, Associate One James Center

901 East Cary Street

Richmond, VA 23219-4030 804.775.1129

emartin@mcguirewoods.com

Jennifer L. Farer, Associate 2001 K Street N.W.

Suite 400

Washington, D.C. 20006 202.828.3336

References

Related documents

In an experiment, we model two stylized facts about capital budgeting practice, budgetary slack creation and delega- tion of decision-making authority. In our setting,

Words and Music by Billie Joe Armstrong, Mike Dirnt and Tre Cool Dirty Rotten BastardsB. © 2012 WB MUSIC

En réalité, non seulement nous montrons que le risque ne peut être segmenté au sein d’un système bancaire national en raison du monopole de la monnaie centrale comme actif

quality and the di¤erence is increasing in the level of quality. In this particular case, costs are similar under public and private provision for medium levels of quality, but

Both the NewEnt and Risk variables (proxies for the level of public protection of property rights) are very (see Sensitivity Analysis below) signi¯cant (at 1 percent level) and has

While the double log function is found to be very close to the true “deep” functional form of M1 demand in the euro area for most of the sample period, consistent with the findings

Drawing lessons from islands that have managed to actively capitalize on their geographic specificities and succeeded in attaining higher levels of competitiveness, the chapter

GC analysis revealed the presence of important compounds related to high-quality agarwood such as 4-phenyl-2-butanone, β-selinene, α-bulnesene, and agarospirol in