• No results found

Supply chain network optimization

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Supply chain network optimization"

Copied!
27
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Supply chain network optimization

Assets & facilities Supply chain management

(2)

• Introduction Groenewout

• Supply chain optimization

• Project approach

• Data requirements

• References

(3)

Groenewout is an international, independent firm

providing a comprehensive range of professional

consulting services and transition support focused on

business improvements related to supply chains and

logistics across all industries.

Sourcing

Assets & facilities

Supply chain management

(4)

BREDA

Multi-disciplinary supply chain & logistics consulting

Business improvements based on quantification,

simulation, visualization and modeling

Realistic, pragmatic approach

Hands-on experience in operational environments

& implementation processes

Independent & 40 years proven success.

Pan-European marketplace, local expertise

References within wide range of industries - long

lasting client relations

(5)

Quality measured by our clients

Cross industries

z Pharmaceutical

z FMCG

z (Fine) chemical

z After market / spare parts

z Home-improvement

(6)

• Introduction Groenewout

• Supply chain optimization

• Project approach

• Data requirements

• References

(7)

OPTIMAL

SUPPLY CHAIN

NETWORK

INBOUND

TRANSPORTATION

COSTS

CUSTOMER

SERVICE

REQUIREMENTS

INVENTORY &

WAREHOUSE

COSTS

OUTBOUND

TRANSPORTATION

COSTS

Trade-off philosophy

(8)

• line haulage: less line hauls costs decrease

• fine distribution: more final distribution km’s costs increase

• handling factory WH: factory warehouse ‘as-is’ no changes

• handling & storage DC’s: increasing economies of scale costs decrease

• inventory costs: increasing economies of scale, lower working stock, lower safety stock required

costs decrease

Trade-off philosophy

Supply chain optimization

(9)

• Introduction Groenewout

• Supply chain optimization

• Project approach

• Data requirements

• References

(10)

THE MOST

COSTS

EFFECTIVE

SOLUTION

MEETING

CUSTOMER

SERVICE

REQUIREMENTS

TO DETERMINE

THE MOST

OPTIMAL SUPPLY

CHAIN NETWORK:

FACILITATES THE FUTURE STRATEGY

Goal

(11)

Identification of Quick-wins for the current supply chain

Identification of the optimal supply chain network in terms

of function, size, location and service metrics for

distribution centers, inbound and outbound transportation

Illustration of the total operational costs associated with

the optimal network

Presentation of high-level rollout plan for the

implementation of the optimal network

Deliverables

(12)

Distribution concept analysis & simulation

Sensitivity analysis

Set-up & verification of distribution network model

Analysis current supply chain &

Desired future supply chain

Volume & costs data

Strategic assessment

Customer service metrics validation

Implementation & transition plan

Project approach

(13)

Create consensus on data, constraints, requirements and assumptions

on which the distribution network optimization will be based:

‰

Level of detail modeling

‰

Warehousing & transportation related data

‰

Operational and customer service constraints

‰

Future trends

‰

Business requirements

‰

Interviews and data collection:



Data workshop



Data gathering (warehousing, transportation)



Strategic assessment

‰

Data analysis

‰

Basic data document

GOAL

ACTIVITIES

(14)

Model of the distribution network in software simulation tool: Base

Case Model

Building the distribution network model, consisting of three steps:

‰

Building the current distribution model

‰

Verification of model with real-life figures (calibration of the model)

‰

Calculating current overall supply chain costs

A distribution network model which will be used for further analysis of

the different distribution network concepts (see next project phases)

GOAL

ACTIVITIES

DELIVERABLES

(15)

Simulation of several distribution concepts. The results

per concept are:

‰ Number of warehouses

‰ Location (position) per warehouses

‰ Function of the warehouses (all SKU’s or subset)

‰ Service areas of the warehouses

Simulation of the effect of different supply chain structures and

concepts:

‰ Yearly operational costs: warehousing, transport, inventory

‰ Warehouse characteristics: sizing, market areas, etc.

‰ Impact on requirements: lead-time, customer service

‰ Evaluation of all distribution concepts against actual costs and

performance

GOAL

ACTIVITIES

(16)

Determine the “robustness” of the preferred solution

Carrying out sensitivity analyses on variables such as:

‰ Growth percentages

‰ Customer service metrics: lead-times, reliability, etc.

‰ Average order size

‰ Acquisition of new business

Validation of the robustness of the preferred supply chain & insight in

the business parameters directly affecting the selection of a preferred

supply chain concept

GOAL

ACTIVITIES

DELIVERABLES

(17)

Implementation & transition plan to transfer from the current supply

chain network to the preferred supply chain network

Analysis and design of an implementation and transition plan:

‰ indication of the timing and effort the implementation of the new

distribution network embeds

‰ high level investment estimate (insourcing versus outsourcing

activities)

‰ risk mitigation for implementation of the new distribution network

GOAL

ACTIVITIES

(18)

Introduction Groenewout

• Supply chain optimization

• Project approach

Data requirements

• References

(19)

VOLUMES

INVENTORY

QUALITATITVE

Inbound (suppliers to plant)

Inventory volume & value

Customer service

Primary (plant to DC)

SKU overlap between DC’s

Lead-times

Inter-company

Business requirements

Direct (plant to customers)

Future growth

Outbound (DC to customer)

Customer strategy

FINANCIAL

WAREHOUSE

Transportation costs

Storage capacity

Warehouse costs

Storage characteristics

Production costs

Inventory costs

Logistics equipment

Personnel

Contracts (outsourced)

PRODUCTION

Product portfolio

Production capacity

MASTER DATA

Product codes

Product grouping

Unit of Measure

Data requirements (1)

(20)

VOLUMES

Inbound

Supplier (shipping location - zip code) Destination (plant location - zip code) Volume shipped (m3 / kg / pallets)

Transport mode (LTL/FTL, air/road, special conditions, ...) Transport conditions

Number of shipments

VOLUMES

Outbound

Warehouse or plant location (zip code) Customer (ship-to location - zip code) Volume shipped (m3 / kg / pallets)

Transport mode (LTL/FTL, air/road, special conditions, ...) Transport conditions

Number of shipments

VOLUMES

Primary &

Inter-company

Warehouse or plant location (Point of origin - zip code) Warehouse or plant location(ship-to location - zip code) Volume shipped (m3 / kg / pallets)

Transport mode (LTL/FTL, air/road, special conditions, ...) Transport conditions

(21)

WAREHOUSE

Warehouse location Owned / outsourced

Footprint: m2 warehouse operations, m2 offices

Storage capacity: pallet locations, shelf locations etc. Storage conditions

Fill rate per location type including maximum storage capacity VAL activities

Personnel (receiving, picking, expedition, management, ...)

Logistics equipment (rental/lease, book value, depreciation period, ....) Costs (personnel, building, equipment, packaging, others)

Contract penalties if applicable Warehouse extension possibilities

PRODUCTION

Plant location

Product portfolio to be produced

(22)

INVENTORY

Warehouse location Inventory volumes Inventory value Stock turns

Number of SKU’s

SKU overlap with other warehouses

MASTER DATA

Product code Product group

Unit-of-Measure transformation table Product value (COGS)

FINANCIAL

QUALITATIVE

Transportation costs

- Per point of origin/destination

- Per inbound / inter-company / outbound Inventory costs

Warehouse costs (see warehouse) Production costs (see production)

Lead-time expectations Future sales growth

(23)

• Introduction Groenewout

• Supply chain optimization

• Project approach

• Data requirements

• References

(24)

Description

Supply chain project for JohnsonDiversey, an industry leader in cleaning and hygiene solutions to the institutional and industrial marketplace.

JohnsonDiversey serves customers in the lodging, food services, retail, health care, food and beverage sectors as well as building service contractors worldwide.

Opportunities

Recently, JohnsonDiversey commissioned a business study, resulting in an updated business strategy. In the area of supply chain management JohnsonDiversey defined three main improvement opportunities.

JohnsonDiversey management was committed to improve their supply chain in terms of operational costs and

optimize their product delivery by detailing and implementing the defined supply chain opportunities.

Solution

Groenewout analyzed different alternative logistics networks for different supply chains.

A sub-regional logistics model was determined to be the optimal solution for chemical products and utensils. For machines and accessories products a centralized solution with maximization of central stock function and direct shipments was determined to be the optimal solution.

Benefits

•Substantial annual operational cost reduction in total supply chain costs

•Significant decrease of European inventory

•Increased flexibility

•One integrated logistics concept and organization as a shared service.

(25)

Space for photo

Description

Nestle Purina PetCare (formerly Friskies) is a producer and distributor of pet food and accessories. Nestle Purina PetCare owns several factories and numerous

warehouses in Europe.

Opportunities

Friskies European Logistics team was committed to improve their distribution in terms of performance and costs for the Benelux countries and Germany.

Solution

Groenewout analyzed different alternative distribution networks. Caused by the uniqueness of articles per

country market, consolidation per country was determined to be the optimal short term solution.

After executing a benchmark analysis Groenewout proved to Nestle that particular contracts for warehousing were too expensive. The decision was made to contract with one logistics service provider to consolidate the German warehouses.

Groenewout developed a RFP for selecting a new logistics

Benefits

The selected service provider proposed:

•10+% Cost reduction in German warehouse costs

•Increased quality and flexibility

Future opportunities

Creating overlap of articles between countries, product rationalization and changes in product sourcing will reduce the annual logistics costs significantly.

(26)

Description

Ideal Standard is the world’s largest manufacturer of bath & kitchen products. The range of products include:

faucets, fixtures, whirlpools, accessories, showers and sinks. Brands include American Standard JADO, Borma, Armitage Shanks, Ceramica Dolomite, Porcher and Ideal Standard.

Opportunities

As a result of several mergers and acquisitions, the “AS-IS” network in Europe contained around 25 distribution centers.

Ideal Standard desired to the optimize its existing European supply chain for fixtures and fittings. The preferred distribution structure should be streamlined:

• Minimize the total distribution costs

• Maximize customer service.

Solution

A detailed analysis of existing distribution network and customer service metrics characteristics was conducted. This provided a critical overview of the current supply chain.

Supply chain simulation models were used to determine the optimal distribution structure: number, location, market region and function of the European distribution centers.

Benefits

• Insight into current supply chain characteristics and performance provided by the systematic analysis

• 15% savings on the total European transportation and warehousing costs were identified.

(27)

M

A K I N G

S

U P P L Y

C

H A I N S

Y

O U R

References

Related documents