• No results found

A Design and Implementation Guide for Tivoli Decision Support Sg245499

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Design and Implementation Guide for Tivoli Decision Support Sg245499"

Copied!
228
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

International Technical Support Organization www.redbooks.ibm.com

A Design and Implementation Guide

for Tivoli Decision Support

(2)
(3)

A Design and Implementation Guide

for Tivoli Decision Support

October 1999

SG24-5499-00

(4)

First Edition (October 1999)

This edition applies to Tivoli Framework Version 3.6.1, Tivoli Enterprise Console Version 3.6.1, Tivoli Distributed Monitoring Version 3.6.1, Tivoli Service Desk Version 5.02, Tivoli Decision Support Version 2.0 for use with the AIX Version 4.3 and Windows NT 4.0 Operating Systems

Comments may be addressed to:

IBM Corporation, International Technical Support Organization Dept. OSJB Building 003 Internal Zip 2834

11400 Burnet Road Austin, Texas 78758-3493

When you send information to IBM, you grant IBM a non-exclusive right to use or distribute the information in any way it believes appropriate without incurring any obligation to you.

Before using this information and the product it supports, be sure to read the general information in Appendix D, “Special notices” on page 191.

(5)

Contents

Figures . . . vii

Tables. . . .xi

Preface . . . xiii

The team that wrote this redbook . . . xiii

Comments welcome . . . xv

Chapter 1. Introduction . . . 1

1.1 From fire fighting to business intelligence . . . 1

1.2 The desired solution for business information . . . 3

1.3 Decision Support Systems . . . 4

1.4 Positioning Tivoli Decision Support in the decision making process . . . 5

1.5 Our approach . . . 7

Chapter 2. Tivoli Decision Support general overview . . . 9

2.1 Overview of Tivoli Decision Support . . . 9

2.2 Tivoli Decision Support product components . . . 10

2.2.1 Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Administrator . . . 11

2.2.2 Tivoli Decision Support Server component . . . 12

2.2.3 Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Interface . . . 12

2.2.4 Cognos PowerPlay . . . 12

2.2.5 Crystal Reports. . . 12

2.2.6 Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides . . . 12

2.3 Tivoli Decision Support implementation modes . . . 14

2.4 Supported platforms . . . 15

2.5 Concepts and terminology . . . 16

2.6 How Tivoli Decision Support works. . . 19

2.7 Who is making use of Tivoli Decision Support? . . . 21

Chapter 3. Methodology . . . 23

3.1 Tivoli Implementation Methodology . . . 23

3.2 Implementing Tivoli Decision Support. . . 25

3.2.1 Requirements gathering phase . . . 25

3.2.2 Systems analysis phase . . . 30

3.2.3 Project planning phase . . . 40

3.2.4 Deployment phase . . . 47

3.2.5 Testing phase . . . 52

3.2.6 Documentation phase . . . 54

Chapter 4. TDS architecture and design considerations . . . 59

(6)

4.2 Integrating Decision Support with Tivoli Enterprise applications . . . 60

4.3 Tivoli Decision Support components. . . 61

4.4 Integrating Tivoli Decision Support components . . . 63

4.4.1 The cube-building process . . . 64

4.4.2 The Discovery Interface . . . 68

4.5 Stand-alone vs. network architecture . . . 70

4.6 Suggested architecture and design solutions . . . 72

4.6.1 Tivoli Service Desk environment - Case study . . . 72

4.6.2 Single TMR environment - Case study . . . 74

4.6.3 Multiple TMR environment - Case study . . . 77

4.7 Troubleshooting tips . . . 81

4.7.1 ODBC source . . . 81

4.7.2 Cube building . . . 81

4.7.3 Discovery interface . . . 82

Chapter 5. Case study . . . 85

5.1 Overview . . . 85

5.2 Methodology . . . 86

5.2.1 Requirements gathering phase . . . 86

5.2.2 Systems analysis and design . . . 86

5.2.3 Deployment . . . 87

5.3 The existing Tivoli environment . . . 87

5.3.1 Tivoli general architecture . . . 87

5.3.2 TMR servers . . . 88

5.3.3 Endpoint gateways . . . 89

5.3.4 TEC server . . . 89

5.3.5 RDBMS and RIM hosts configuration . . . 90

5.3.6 Tivoli DM and monitors for performance and capacity trend data 90 5.4 Identifying the reports requirements . . . 92

5.4.1 Customer reporting requirements . . . 93

5.4.2 The SDC actual solution for reporting . . . 93

5.4.3 The Reports of the NCO account . . . 97

5.5 Customer objectives . . . 113

5.6 Mapping Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides . . . 114

5.6.1 Detailed reports mapping workshop . . . 114

5.7 Tivoli Decision Support reports and business information . . . 116

5.7.1 Server Performance Prediction Guide. . . 116

5.7.2 Event Management Guide . . . 125

5.7.3 Domino Management Guide . . . 128

5.7.4 Network Element Performance Guide . . . 137

5.8 Suggested architecture and solution design . . . 140

5.9 Tivoli Decision Support deployment process . . . 144

(7)

5.9.2 Installation of the Tivoli Decision Support server components. . 145

5.9.3 Installation of the Tivoli Decision Support Administrator . . . 153

5.9.4 Installation of the Tivoli Decision Support client components . . 154

5.9.5 Deploying TDS for server performance prediction . . . 154

5.9.6 Deploying the Event Management Guide . . . 161

5.10 Future reporting requirements . . . 162

5.10.1 Additional reports . . . 162

5.10.2 Additional recommended TDS Discovery Guides . . . 163

Chapter 6. Reports and decision information usage . . . 167

6.1 The scenario . . . 168

6.2 The roles . . . 168

6.2.1 The systems analyst role . . . 168

6.2.2 The IT manager role . . . 169

6.2.3 The Chief Executive Officer role . . . 169

6.3 The discovery process . . . 169

6.3.1 The system analyst discovery process . . . 169

6.3.2 IT manager discovery process . . . 177

6.3.3 CEO’s discovery process . . . 181

6.4 Conclusion . . . 183

Appendix A. Tivoli Implementation Methodology (TIM) 3.6. . . 185

A.1 Target market . . . 185

A.2 Customer profile . . . 185

A.3 The top three things to remember. . . 185

A.4 What is new with TIM? . . . 186

A.5 What is unique? . . . 186

A.6 Where can I find information on TIM? . . . 186

Appendix B. Tivoli Decision Support customer support . . . 187

B.1 The support process . . . 187

Appendix C. Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides availability . 189 Appendix D. Special notices . . . 191

Appendix E. Related publications . . . 195

E.1 International Technical Support Organization publications. . . 195

E.2 Redbooks on CD-ROM . . . 196

E.3 Other publications . . . 196

How to get ITSO redbooks . . . 197

(8)

List of abbreviations . . . 199 Index . . . 201 ITSO redbook evaluation . . . 209

(9)

Figures

1. The evolution to business intelligence . . . 2

2. The challenge of a better solution for business information. . . 4

3. TDS in the decision making process . . . 6

4. Tivoli Decision Support components . . . 11

5. Tivoli Decision Support in stand alone implementation mode . . . 14

6. Tivoli Decision Support network implementation mode . . . 15

7. The operation of Tivoli Decision Support . . . 20

8. TIM schematic overview . . . 24

9. Requirements gathering process flow . . . 26

10. Systems Analysis process flow . . . 31

11. Typical architecture . . . 35

12. File server information example form. . . 37

13. TDS administrator PC information example form . . . 38

14. TDS client PC information example form . . . 38

15. Database server information example form . . . 39

16. Network information example form . . . 40

17. Project planning process flow . . . 41

18. Sample project plan . . . 44

19. Deployment process flow. . . 48

20. Testing process flow . . . 52

21. Documentation process flow . . . 55

22. Tivoli Decision Support functionality diagram . . . 60

23. Decision Support components integration . . . 63

24. Cube-building process - Step 1 . . . 65

25. Cube-building process - Step 2 . . . 66

26. Cube-building process - Step 3 . . . 66

27. Cube-building process - Step 4 . . . 67

28. Viewing the multidimensional reports . . . 68

29. Viewing Crystal Reports. . . 69

30. TDS in stand-alone mode . . . 70

31. Network installation architecture . . . 71

32. Tivoli Service Desk environment case study . . . 73

33. Single TMR environment case study . . . 75

34. Single TMR environment with Tivoli Decision Support . . . 76

35. Multiple TMR environment case study. . . 78

36. Multiple TMR environment with Tivoli Decision Support . . . 79

37. Service Delivery Center - West architecture . . . 88

38. Tivoli Distributed Monitoring object relationships. . . 92

39. The Problem for reporting . . . 94

(10)

41. The SRM method for reporting . . . 97

42. In-house performance and capacity. . . 98

43. Detailed report - CPU utilization by server. . . 99

44. Detailed report - process memory and paging utilization by server . . . 100

45. Detailed report - network I/O utilization . . . 101

46. Detailed report - DASD usage by server . . . 102

47. Percentage availability by server . . . 103

48. Detailed alert summary by server . . . 103

49. Lotus Notes - Monthly mail server statistics report . . . 104

50. Lotus Notes - Monthly database server report. . . 105

51. Lotus Notes - Daily mail hub report . . . 106

52. Lotus Notes - Daily MTA server report. . . 106

53. Lotus Notes - Hourly response time report . . . 107

54. Lotus Notes - Hourly concurrent users report . . . 107

55. Lotus Notes - Hourly sessions-per-minute report . . . 108

56. Lotus Notes - Hourly mail box size report . . . 108

57. Lotus Notes - Hourly SMTP transferred messages report . . . 109

58. AIX servers - CPU utilization reports . . . 110

59. AIX servers - Hard disk and file systems utilization report . . . 111

60. AIX servers - Account summary report . . . 111

61. NT servers - CPU, memory, and disk utilization report. . . 112

62. NT servers - Account Summary Report . . . 113

63. All System Metrics report . . . 118

64. CPU utilization by server report . . . 119

65. Memory utilization report . . . 120

66. Network I/O utilization report . . . 121

67. CPU utilization memory page rates by operating system . . . 122

68. Summary report by operating system . . . 123

69. CPU average forecast by system purpose . . . 124

70. Under-provisioned/Over-provisioned servers report . . . 125

71. SLA statistics by event class . . . 126

72. Which events take the longest to fix? report . . . 127

73. Event source volume by hour report . . . 128

74. Domino network traffic report. . . 130

75. Domino server statistics - Mail routed by server report . . . 131

76. Domino statistics - Total KB transferred report . . . 132

77. Domino statistics - Number of users report . . . 133

78. Domino statistics - Mail average delivery time report . . . 134

79. Domino statistics - Replication statistics report . . . 135

80. Domino statistics - Server average delivery time by hour report . . . 136

81. Domino statistics - Mail box file size by server report . . . 137

82. Network Element Performance Guide - Cisco CPU utilization report . . . 138

(11)

84. Network Element Performance Guide-Top ten nodes by transition count 140

85. Recommended architecture in network mode . . . 141

86. The update procedure first script - transfer.cmd . . . 147

87. The update procedure second script - copycubes.cmd . . . 148

88. The Transfer_Cubes task . . . 149

89. Defining the Transfer_Cubes task . . . 149

90. The Transfer_Cubes job . . . 150

91. Defining the Transfer_Cubes job . . . 150

92. The Copy_Cubes task . . . 151

93. Defining the Transfer_Cubes task . . . 151

94. The Copy_Cubes job . . . 152

95. Defining the Transfer_Cubes job . . . 152

96. Scheduling the jobs . . . 153

97. Scheduled jobs . . . 153

98. Lotus Notes mail servers by CPU utilization . . . 171

99. Lotus Notes Mail Servers daily average run length cue. . . 172

100.Lotus Notes mail servers by memory utilization . . . 173

101.Lotus Notes mail servers that need more memory . . . 174

102.Lotus Notes mail servers by network utilization . . . 175

103.Lotus Notes mail server - forecasted average mail delivery time . . . 176

104.Under-provisioned and over-provisioned Notes servers . . . 178

105.Performance anomalies by server. . . 179

106.Lotus Notes server approaching critical thresholds. . . 180

(12)
(13)

Tables

1. Requirements gathering phase items . . . 26

2. Systems analysis phase items. . . 31

3. Minimum configuration table . . . 36

4. Project planning phase items. . . 40

5. TDS workshop summary . . . 46

6. Deployment phase items . . . 47

7. TDS deployment guide . . . 48

8. Testing phase items. . . 52

9. Documentation phase items . . . 55

10. The TDS Discovery Guides mapping. . . 114

11. Detailed mapping reference table . . . 115

12. Macro procedure for deploying TDS . . . 144

13. Minimum hardware requirements . . . 145

14. TDS file server deployment steps . . . 146

15. SPP Discovery Guide installation steps. . . 154

16. DM Roll-up installation steps . . . 156

17. Event Management Discovery Guide installation steps. . . 161

18. Future requirements reference table . . . 163

(14)
(15)

Preface

Deploying a Tivoli Decision Support solution requires careful planning and includes numerous activities.

The primary objective of this redbook is to describe the methodology used to deploy and migrate from the current reporting tools to Tivoli Decision Support by using an IBM service delivery center as a case study. In addition, we will describe how decision makers with different roles and responsibilities can benefit from Tivoli Decision Support and make better decisions by simulating typical problems in IT business.

This redbook is targeted at the technical professional responsible for migrating from the current reporting tools used in his or her organization to Tivoli Decision Support and will be available as a reference book upon the deployment of Tivoli Decision Support.

This redbook is a valuable addition to existing product documentation and is aimed at both architects and implementors of enterprise systems

management solutions.

This redbook should be read in conjunction with the product documentation, which complements some of the concepts explained in this book.

The team that wrote this redbook

This redbook was produced by a team of specialists from around the world working at the International Technical Support Organization, Austin Center. Edson Manoel is an Advisory ITSO representative working as a project leader at the International Technical Support Organization, Tivoli Group, Austin Center. He applies his extensive field experience as an I/T Tivoli Specialist to his work at the ITSO where he writes extensively on all areas of systems management. Prior to joining the ITSO, Edson worked in IBM Brazil’s Professional Services Organization as an I/T Architect where he was involved in numerous projects designing and implementing systems and network management solutions for major IBM Brazil customers.

Fernando Bergamo is an I/T Specialist working in the Technology and Automation Group at the IBM Technology Center, Brazil. He holds a Computer Engineering degree from the State University of Campinas

(UNICAMP). His areas of expertise include system management, networking, database administration, data warehousing, and all Tivoli core applications.

(16)

He is currently working on deploying Tivoli enterprise solutions for several IBM customers in Brazil.

Dave Hulse is an Advisory IT Specialist working at IBM Global Services Johannesburg, South Africa. He has over 20 years of experience in the IT industry. He has been with IBM for 18 months and, during that time, was project leader responsible for the design and deployment of the largest Tivoli implementation in Southern Africa. His areas of expertise include designing customer IT solutions, and he has extensive experience in the field of systems management.

Rakesh Parshotam is an Advisory IT Specialist working as a Tivoli Architect at IBM Global Services in South Africa. He holds a degree in Computer Science and is a Certified Tivoli Consultant and Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer. He has been working with Tivoli for the past three years and has held various positions including Technical Team Leader for major Tivoli systems management deployment projects in South Africa.

The team would like to express special thanks to Ling Tai, Senior Software Engineer working for Tivoli in Raleigh, for her major contribution to this book. Thanks also go to the following people for their invaluable contributions to this project:

Kim Querner

Tivoli Systems, Austin Bill Meloling

Tivoli Systems, Raleigh Lisa Chaves, Axel Elfner IBM, Tucson

Shawn Eldridge, Douglas Fuzie Tivoli Systems, Indianapolis Temi Rose

International Technical Support Organization, Austin Center Milos Radosavljevic

(17)

Comments welcome

Your comments are important to us!

We want our redbooks to be as helpful as possible. Send us your comments about this or other redbooks in one of the following ways:

• Fax the evaluation form found in “ITSO redbook evaluation” on page 209 to the fax number shown on the form.

• Use the online evaluation form found at http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/

(18)
(19)

Chapter 1. Introduction

This redbook was written with the input and experience of many people, and the result is a suggested approach that may apply directly to your situation or can be a guide to anyone involved in implementing Tivoli Decision Support in a large-scale environment.

Enterprises usually have some reporting tools that assist in the performance of daily tasks. Very often, these tools are neither well-integrated with the business of the enterprise nor are they able, for example, to provide predictable information about growth or change. In addition, these tools generally do not provide a good and easy way of interpreting information that helps to make better decisions because they are normally designed for and used by technical people (who often make the interpretation of information as easy as reading and understanding hieroglyphics).

Decision making often requires the analysis of large amounts of data, complex relationships, and abstract correlations. Decision support systems usually help in the evaluation of consequences (the what if) of given decisions and may advise which decisions are best for achieving particular goals.

We will move towards a real scenario explaining the methodology used, the architecture and design considerations, and all phases of deployment of the Tivoli solution for the decision-making process. Furthermore, we will simulate a typical problem showing how decision makers with different roles and responsibilities can benefit from the business information provided by Tivoli Decision Support in order to make more efficient decisions.

We do not explain the product details of Tivoli applications in this book, but we assume that the reader is reasonably familiar with Tivoli architecture and Tivoli applications. We have dedicated Chapter 2, “Tivoli Decision Support general overview” on page 9 to providing the reader with a brief introduction to Tivoli Decision Support.

1.1 From fire fighting to business intelligence

The Information Technology (IT) business is changing. An evolution is in progress, a paradigm shift that is changing the way we do business. Customers are demanding end-to-end solutions tied to Service Level Agreements (SLAs). The challenge for technology is to manage and deliver these services, such as availability, performance, and capacity management

(20)

across the entire enterprise as e-Business spawns more and more devices that are connected to it.

A few years ago, it was sufficient for service providers (IT Departments) to manage and plan business operations using monthly batch reports. Changes in the organizations took a long time to be implemented. After that, with the implementation of some management tools, we were able to execute queries from the historical operational data in order to get reports or charts that only allowed us to be reactive to problems.

Today, enterprises need to provide decision makers with fast and easy access to information that reflects the constant changes in the environment. Decision makers and customers need to have access to tools that provide them with the ability to identify trends and model relationships in the data to find behavioral anomalies in the business environments.

Figure 1. The evolution to business intelligence

Large amounts of data are stored in your enterprise. This data contains precious information about the way the enterprise does business, its process, and customers. In these competitive days, using the knowledge provided by

IT Investments Business Drivers Fire Fighting No Tools No Process Reactive Few Defined Process Managed Environment Monitoring & Defined Process Proactive Inter Management Platform Exception and Predictive Management Based on SLA Cust omer Satis fact ion

(21)

this data in order to make strategic business decisions can often move the enterprise ahead of the competition.

Business intelligence is what we are describing in this section; It is the ability to be proactive to problems, leverage the assets in our business to gain profit from available data, and provide the know-how needed to make well-informed decisions for our business.

As e-business drives the need for more network devices, we will need technologies that enable us to manage resources across the entire enterprise, end-to-end, not only by exception but by predictive analysis as well. One such technology is Tivoli Decision Support, soon people will ask: How did we manage without it?

1.2 The desired solution for business information

Historically, both Network and Systems Management tools have focused on the state and function of individually managed elements or groups of similar devices. However, these tools, with their incompatible and independent data, do little to help those who must manage based on a broader vision of the business and its supporting services, a capability that is now essential in enterprise distributed systems management.

The challenge is to view systems and network management from the perspective of the business as a whole. End-to-end service delivery and reporting has become the model for distributed management. This model is commonly called service management or service level agreement

management. The question facing IT managers is whether there are tools and products that are up to the challenge.

The greatest obstacle to full end-to-end service level agreement management is not the lack of but the abundance of management tools. If you think of your own organization, there are probably numerous tools for managing the enterprise. Some are vendor-specific, and others are produced in-house, each defining its own standard for data formats and reporting. Every tool has been optimized to address a specific or limited set of management functions.

(22)

Figure 2. The challenge of a better solution for business information.

As shown in Figure 2, the challenge is to find a complete solution that provides an integrated framework or platform offering multiple management functions across multiple vendor applications, services, or devices across the entire enterprise collecting the data and storing it in a standard format that can be processed and transformed into meaningful business information. Attempts to provide this capability are not new. One such solution is Tivoli, which offers centralized policy-based functions, such as user management, software distribution, and services accessible to third party vendors.

1.3 Decision Support Systems

The concept of a Decision Support System (DSS) is widely used in both research and in many different applications, but it has not yet been uniquely defined.

In order to avoid possible misunderstandings, it is necessary to present the basic characteristics of the class of DSS we will define. Let us start with a brief discussion of the environment in which a DSS will be used. The key person in this consideration is an individual who uses a DSS in real life situations. By convention, such a person is called a Decision Maker (DM). By this term, we mean both a person who makes real decisions (depending on

... into Business Information Standard Format Monitor A Monitor B

.

.

.

.

Monitor Z Multiple Management Functions Transforming the Data ...

(23)

an application, this person may be a manager, engineer, or operator) and an expert who may that person’s supervisor. Decisions are made within a Decision Making Process (DMP), which, in situations that justify the use of a DSS, is a complex sequence of tasks. We assume that a final decision is to be made by the Decision Maker, and a Decision Support System does not serve as a replacement or control of a DM. In other words, a DSS is not aimed at the automatic selection of decisions.

The following are characteristics of a DSS:

• Systems that facilitate/extend knowledge management capabilities. • Systems that coordinate distributed decision making.

• Systems that offer advice, expectations, facts, analyses, and so on. • The user interface of a DSS is designed in such a way that a DM may

obtain, from the DSS, information and answers for questions that she or he considers to be important for a DMP.

• DSS are interactive by nature.

• Even though a DSS might be unable to solve a problem facing DM, it can be used to stimulate the DM’s thoughts about the problems.

The following DSS definition is the one that can better explain the class of DSS we will work with:

DSS DSS is a supportive tool for the management and processing of large amounts of information and logical relations that helps a DM extend his or her habitual domain and, thus, helps him or her reach a better decision. In other words, a DSS can be considered a tool that, when under the full control of a DM, performs the difficult tasks of data processing and provides relevant information that enables a DM to concentrate on this part of the DMP.

1.4 Positioning Tivoli Decision Support in the decision making process

Tivoli Decision Support (TDS) is designed to provide the best possible environment for facilitating the Decision Making Process and helps you to be pro-active, planning future changes and determining their impact on the organization.

The better the measurements and feedback regarding business processes, the better a decision maker can adjust for changes and maximize the results in the decision making process. In addition, when decisions are not made in a

(24)

timely manner, windows of opportunity can close, and business is usually not done.

Tivoli Decision Support as a technology is best known for dynamically providing the decision maker with interactive business indicators and then allowing the user to look at those indicators from many different perspectives. For example, let us suppose that a product manager wants to know how well the product is being supported in South America this month and compare the rates with the same month the previous year. Once she or he views the high-level report, she or he may drill into the region to only look at how Brazil is doing. Moreover, she or he may drill into the southeast region and look at how a particular city is doing. This technology is called On-line Analytical Processing (OLAP) or multidimensional analysis.

In addition, Tivoli Decision Support allows us to benefit from information collected by the customer’s Tivoli solution. For example, the support centers collect a large quantity of transactional data from their customers, which contains valuable information about the way they interact with the business. With Tivoli Decision Support, Decision Makers have a way to manage this data and convert it into useful information providing a way to evaluate and identify trends, to gain insight into the way customers do business, and to make better decisions.

Figure 3. TDS in the decision making process

Tivoli Decision

Support Data processing and Management of logical relationship Decision Tivoli Applications RDBMS Decision Maker Accessing business relevant information

(25)

As shown in Figure 3 on page 6, Tivoli Management Applications, such as Enterprise Console, Service Desk, Inventory, Distributed Monitoring, and so on collect the data and store it in databases. Tivoli Decision Support selects management data from these databases, performs calculations, and adds value to the data by managing the natural relationship in the data. At this point, only business relevant information is offered to the Decision Maker who is in charge of the decision.

With Tivoli Decision Support, Tivoli Enterprise solution has moved a step forward to reach the desired solution for Business Decision Information providing the ability to:

• Measure the effectiveness of your operation

• Gain insight into the potential satisfaction level of customers • Gain insight into the value of your customer relationships • Further leverage your investment in technology and automation

• Identify areas of weakness to convert from reactive activities to proactive planning

• Discover patterns that influence your decision making and future planning • Become more efficient and effective

• Gain control over your business faster

1.5 Our approach

The remaining sections of this redbook are divided into the following chapters:

• Chapter 2, “Tivoli Decision Support general overview” on page 9 This chapter provides information about the product describing the concepts and terminology used by Tivoli Decision Support. In addition, we provide basic information about the Tivoli Decision Support components. • Chapter 3, “Methodology” on page 23

In a generic form, this chapter is intended to provide the reader with basic information about the methodology used to plan, deploy, and migrate to Tivoli Decision Support:

• Requirement Gathering phase • Systems Analysis phase • Project Planning phase

(26)

• Deployment phase • Testing phase

• Documentation phase

Chapter 4, “TDS architecture and design considerations” on page 59 In this chapter, we will describe some considerations for the Tivoli Decision Support architecture/topology/design solution, such as:

• How Tivoli Decision Support integrates with the Tivoli architecture • How the Tivoli Decision Support components integration works • Tivoli Decision Support architectures based on case studies

environments • Troubleshooting tips Chapter 5, “Case study” on page 85

This chapter exercises the knowledge acquired from the previous chapters performing an example by exploring one of the IBM Service Delivery Centers as a customer presenting a structured Tivoli Decision Support deployment solution.

Chapter 6, “Reports and decision information usage” on page 167

This chapter demonstrates how Tivoli Decision Support can support the decision making process by describing a simple scenario and outlining the steps used to find and analyze critical data in order to make a well-informed decision.

(27)

Chapter 2. Tivoli Decision Support general overview

In the context of delivering services in a complex IT environment, to

accomplish a high level of customer satisfaction requires the IT function of an organization to have a full understanding of and insight into the different aspects of its operation and performance in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. For example, for the network analyst of an organization to conduct network performance tuning, he or she may need to find out not only which portion of the corporate network has the most traffic, but also why, when, and which systems cause the most traffic. Similarly, for the IT manager, the network analyst may need to know how well his help desk operation performs not only in terms of, for example, how many problems were resolved within the SLA, but also in terms of what problems were resolved, by whom, and over a series of time intervals.

Despite the high volume of data being collected by the different systems in an organization, without a suitable tool, it is increasingly difficult for technical analysts and IT managers alike to obtain answers to business-relevant questions, such as those discussed above. As a result, resolutions and decision making are frequently conducted using only a subset of the information stored in the organization.

It is the goal of Tivoli Decision Support to maximize the value of the Tivoli data being collected across the various systems in organizations by making them available to aid analysis and decision making.

2.1 Overview of Tivoli Decision Support

Tivoli Decision Support provides a powerful mechanism to aid its users to dive into complex database structures and explore them in different scopes, levels of detail, and from different perspectives. It also allows its users to analyze data in multiple dimensions. Collectively, these features enable the user to gain a deeper understanding of and insight into the relationship between the data stored in different systems that affect the business operation and performance of an organization.

Because of its flexibility in handling data in different scopes, levels of details, perspectives, and dimensions, Tivoli Decision Support addresses the

information need of different users for conducting analyses and decision making - from technical analysts, through line managers, to executives. Finally, Tivoli Decision Support handles the delivery of and access to the data. It facilitates knowledge discovery and user access to information. Data

(28)

collected can be shared with others in the organization using delivery mechanisms including hard copy printouts, files, and push content. In the latter case, content that has been collected by one user can be sent to a central repository on a company’s intranet from which other users can gain access to the content.

2.2 Tivoli Decision Support product components

Tivoli Decision Support can be categorized into two main parts: • Tivoli Decision Support Base Product

• Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides

The base product provides functions that are necessary to configure, administer, and operate Tivoli Decision Support and is the prerequisite for using the TDS Discovery Guides. The base product is composed of the following components: • Discovery Administrator • TDS Server component • Discovery Interface • Cognos PowerPlay • Crystal Reports

The TDS Discovery Guides are software add-on modules that put the application of TDS in context. For example, the Call Center Management Guide deals with issues related to the decision making process associated with support requests, resolution rates, and so on.

Figure 4 on page 11 shows the relationship between the Tivoli Decision Support Base Product and Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides.

(29)

Figure 4. Tivoli Decision Support components

The following sections are dedicated to explaining each of the Tivoli Decision Support components. For further information, refer to the product

documentation.

2.2.1 Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Administrator

The Discovery Administrator helps you ensure that Tivoli Decision Support functions correctly within your organization and information is kept up to date. The Discovery Administrator performs the following tasks:

• The Discovery Administrator has access to the database in order to gather and maintain all data used by Tivoli Decision Support. The Discovery Administrator can be customized to automatically gather the data, which is stored in special files (it populates these special files with current data from your organization’s databases) at pre defined intervals or it can enable you to perform such operations manually.

• It provides specific parameters you can set when building or customizing cubes. These parameters affect the operation of specific cubes and enable you to customize the behavior of views in the Discovery Interface.

Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides:

(30)

• It enables you to set parameters that are specific to your enterprise’s operation. These parameters, such as severity level thresholds and business hours, determine how Tivoli Decision Support interprets data and makes calculations when generating views.

2.2.2 Tivoli Decision Support Server component

The TDS Server component, best known as TDS File Server, acts as a repository for TDS. This component contains TDS related models, queries, templates, and other information required to generate views for the Discovery Interface.

2.2.3 Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Interface

The Discovery Interface is the client component of TDS. This is the interface to Decision Support. It provides all the tools needed to open and work with views of data from your organization’s enterprise databases.

2.2.4 Cognos PowerPlay

Cognos PowerPlay is a third-party application from Cognos Inc. It is a multi-dimensional analysis and reporting tool that is included in Tivoli

Decision Support. Cognos PowerPlay can generate customized views based on queries to the databases in your enterprise. It can also display views in a variety of graphical styles including bar, line, and pie charts.

Using the tools provided by Tivoli Discovery Interface and PowerPlay, you can turn low-level detailed data into useful business knowledge. After a view is opened in PowerPlay format, you can analyze many dimensions of the data to determine relationships, trends, effects, and so on. PowerPlay also gives you the option of further accessing view details so that you can break out and analyze the data behind it.

2.2.5 Crystal Reports

Crystal Reports is a third-party reporting application from Seagate Software Inc. This application generates text-based views from standard database queries. Tivoli Decision Support uses many views in Crystal Reports format in the TDS Discovery Guides.

2.2.6 Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides

A Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guide is a TDS module that groups enterprise data into specialized categories. Each category contains a series of topics that correspond to the different aspects of that category. Each topic

(31)

contains a number of views that are associated with the data elements being examined.

Tivoli Decision Support uses the Discovery Guides to aid in discovering key information. With this information, Tivoli Decision Support becomes a powerful end-user solution. This solution provides users with a

comprehensive set of views into their enterprise’s data. Along with the views are methods (including algorithms, queries, and reports) for abstracting key business indicators from the business data. Managers can use these indicators as key business information to improve efficiency, performance, and profitability.

TDS includes several Discovery Guides. Other Guides are available as additional options. Appendix C, “Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides availability” on page 189, offers a complete list of the Tivoli Decision Support Discovery Guides including those that are shipped with TDS Version 2.0. TDS Discovery Guides contain algorithms, queries, reports, views, and business models that best represent a business concept. Guides can be very robust and contain several hundred views and multiple business models. Along with the views, guides have embedded contextual information associated with views. The context helps users identify, discover, and understand what the view has to offer. For example, as the user views and interprets data in Tivoli Decision Support, the Tivoli Discovery Interface provides several features to facilitate the user. These features include hints, related views, and keyword searches.

No customization, analysis, or programming is required to use Tivoli Decision Support guides. By selecting guides in the Discovery Interface, managers can define the scope of their data searches to yield the most relevant results for their needs. A call center manager, for instance, may want to see only data that pertains to his or her area of the business. He or she may not need to review data that another department manager needs to review. It is only necessary to activate all relevant TDS Discovery Guides and turn off all other guides. The views shown in the Tivoli Discovery Interface topic map are only those associated with the Call Center Management Discovery Guide.

Managers can select as many Guides as they want to expand the scope of their data search, for instance, if the call center manager wants to review not only relevant call center data, but also data collected about the health of his or her business’ contacts. The call center manager selects the Call Center Management Discovery guide as well as the Relationship Management Discovery Guide. Now, the views available to the call center manager in the

(32)

topic map are a combination of the two guides he or she selected. The call center manager’s scope has changed to encompass more views.

2.3 Tivoli Decision Support implementation modes

Tivoli Decision Support can be implemented in either Stand-alone or Network mode.

• Stand-alone mode

All the TDS components are installed and run on one machine. The stand alone machine also requires the installation of the database client

software and the ODBC driver in order to have access to the databases from which one or more cubes are built. This database connection also allows report generation by running database queries against the individual databases.

Figure 5 shows an example of a Tivoli Decision Support implementation in stand alone mode:

Figure 5. Tivoli Decision Support in stand alone implementation mode

• Network mode

Only TDS Discovery Interface and Cognos PowerPlay are installed on the client machine. In addition, the client requires the installation of both the Client Database and the ODBC Driver, in order to have access to the data stored in the database server, when generating Crystal reports. The TDS Version 2.0 installation CD contains the Intersolv 3.01 32-bit ODBC Driver for Oracle and Sybase.

The TDS Server component is installed on a file server which the client machines have access to a shared drive that will contain all the cubes generated.

A separate machine is used as the administrator system where the Discovery Administrator module is installed along with PowerPlay. The

INVENTORY

DM

TEC

DATABASES

Machine running TDS in stand alone mode

(33)

Administrator system should access the shared drive in the TDS File Server. In addition, it also requires the database client and the ODBC driver in order to have a connection to the database from which the cubes are built. The cube files created by the Discovery Administrator are stored on the TDS File server.

The diagram in Figure 6 on page 15 shows an example of a Tivoli Decision Support in the network mode:

Figure 6. Tivoli Decision Support network implementation mode

2.4 Supported platforms

The following software platforms are supported by Tivoli Decision Support Version 2.0: Operating Systems: • Windows NT 4.0 • Windows 95 TDS Discovery Interface TDS File Server TDS Discovery Administrator TDS Discovery Interface Database Server access the Cubes access the Cubes ODBC connection stores the Cubes

Crystal Reports Crystal Reports

builds the Cubes

(34)

Database Management Systems: • Oracle • Sybase • SQL Server • Informix • DB2

2.5 Concepts and terminology

This section provides some important Tivoli Decision Support concepts and terminology.

Category

A Category is a major division of data in the Tivoli Decision Support topic map. The enterprise data is grouped according to concepts, such as productivity or interaction trends. Within a Category, the user can find more specifically-related types of data. See also Topic and View.

Cubes

A cube is a data container used by PowerPlay. PowerPlay is a

multi-dimensional reporting and analysis tool packaged with Tivoli Decision Support.

As opposed to a flat two-dimensional table of rows and columns, a

multi-dimensional array can be visualized as a cube with many sides, with each dimension forming a side. The cube is arranged so that every data item is located and accessed based on the intersection of the dimension members that define it.

Cubes are built by the TDS Discovery Administrator, which runs a query against the database and executes the Cognos Transformer. Cognos Transformer is a component of Cognos PowerPlay. The function of the Cognos transformer is to input the queries and summarize the data (by counting, averaging, calculating percentage, and so on) and pack this information into a compressed cube file (*.MDC). The TDS Discovery Interface executes PowerPlay reports that look at these cube files for historical data rather than live data.

(35)

Dimensions

A dimension refers to a broad grouping of descriptive data about an aspect of a business, such as software products and dates. Each dimension includes categories in one or more drill-down paths and an optional set of special categories. See also drill-up and drill-down.

Dimension line

The dimension line shows the dimensions in the cube and the categories within each dimension currently being examined.

Drill-up and Drill-down

Drill-up refers to looking at data in a progressively more general way whereas drill-down refers to looking at data in a progressively more detailed way. Drill-through

Drill-through is more detailed than drill-down. While drill-down stops at the lower level of consolidated data, drill-through goes one step further by looking at the actual data records themselves. For example, if the breakup of the types of problems resolved by a particular analyst is the lowest level of consolidation, drill-through looks at the actual records that correspond to the problem descriptions themselves.

Filter

A filter is a means of ensuring that a data search yields the most relevant results. In Tivoli Decision Support, the user can specify data selection criteria, such as data ranges or severity levels, that restrict the data search and result in only relevant data.

Layer

Layer is the third set of dimension categories, along with rows and columns, that you can add to the views in TDS. Layers offer details for another dimension to provide a new perspective on your views. A view can contain several layers, but you can look at only one at a time.

Measures

Measures refer to indicators you use to gauge the performance of your organization. For example, measures can be the number of problem requests received and the average time taken to resolve a problem.

(36)

Models

A model contains definitions of queries, dimensions, and measures as well as objects for one or more cubes that Cognos Transformer creates via the TDS Discovery Administrator for viewing and reporting in PowerPlay.

Profile

A profile is a feature in the Discovery Interface that enables each user to configure settings and views that pertain only to him or her. The Discovery Interface can contain several profiles.

Related view

A related view is a view that is different from the current view but may contain additional relevant data. Tivoli Decision Support automatically suggests views that are related to the current view. These additional views are listed in the Related Views tab in the hint pane.

Role

A role is a user-selected description that describes the user’s position in all areas of the business. A user can select one or more roles based on the scope of his or her position. By specifying one or more roles, the user establishes the scope of the information contained on the topic map. The more roles are specified, the greater the scope of the data searches displayed on the topic map.

Selection criteria

Selection criteria are the parameters specified by the user when conducting a data search. Selection criteria act as filters ensuring that only relevant data is yielded by a data search. See also Filter.

Slicing and Dicing

Slicing and Dicing refers to the process of extracting information for viewing from the cube file by selecting different dimensions. This process can be thought of as constructing a multi-dimensional space by using the selected dimensions for its constituent axes or as looking at the same data from a variety of angles.

Topic

A topic is a subcategory of data in the Tivoli Decision Support topic map. Within each category of enterprise data, data is subdivided into related

(37)

topics. Within each topic, the user can choose an individual type of data for viewing. See also Category and View.

Topic Map

Topic map is the user’s primary means of navigating Tivoli Decision Support. In the topic map, the user can choose specific categories, topics, and views. When a view is selected, a specially-configured view appears in the view pane. See also View.

View

A view is the most detailed type of question in the topic map. A view provides the user with an outlook of the data stored in the cube file or the data

retrieved from a special database query.

2.6 How Tivoli Decision Support works

The Tivoli Discovery Administrator module, which is installed on your system if you run in stand-alone mode or on the system administrator’s system if you run in network mode, connects to your enterprise’s databases. When you issue a request for information in the Tivoli Discovery Interface, Tivoli Decision Support either reads the information from the database directly (if the report requested is a Crystal report) or reads the cube file created by the Tivoli Discovery Administrator (if the report requested is a multi-dimensional report). The cube is summarized data that is read from the database when the cube is built by the Tivoli Discovery Administrator. The information is then returned to the Discovery Interface and presented to you.

(38)

Figure 7. The operation of Tivoli Decision Support

Because of its integration with PowerPlay and Crystal Reports, Tivoli

Decision Support provides snapshot-style views of data that are displayed in the Discovery Interface. The data can be viewed in one of several formats: as text, a bar chart, a line chart, or some other graphical format. The default format depends on the type of data you are viewing, but you can select different formats for some types of views. These views allow you to:

• Analyze data from different perspectives • Compare current activities to historical records • Spot trends

• Troubleshoot

• Evaluate resource allocation • Make projections and forecasts • Perform other management tasks

The Discovery Interface also provides features that can automate your search for data. For example, you can use bookmarks to collect your favorite views; so, they are instantly available. Instead of manually browsing for data, you can use the Search tool to find information based on keywords. The

Crystal Reports TDS Discovery Interface

Enterprise Databases Multi-dimensional Reports Cubes TDS Discovery Administrator

(39)

Discovery Interface’s History feature tracks your most recently used views; so, you can quickly return to them.

2.7 Who is making use of Tivoli Decision Support?

Tivoli has identified three distinct groups of users for Tivoli Decision Support: Explorers, Tourists, and One-minute managers. Each group defines a set of needs unique to the group:

• Explorers use existing Tivoli Decision Support metrics and reports as a stepping stone to discover additional trends and views. After they notice a trend in the data, they investigate why the trends occur. Most

organizations have a limited number of employees devoted to the task of exploring, but they are typically required to continually research the effectiveness of their organization. The information they gather is funneled to other employees in the organization.

• Tourists want to explore, but they do not want to go into areas that are dead ends or areas that do not quickly meet their needs. Typically, tourists want as much freedom as possible to follow their touring needs as long as each step meets their needs. They spend time looking for data, but they want a high success rate in finding what they want when they want it. There are usually more tourists in an organization than there are explorers.

• One-minute managers do not want to spend their time exploring. They want to continually review a set of views that allow them to know what they need to know. One-minute managers need a fixed set of views they can reference, and they want views customized to their specific needs. For example, analysts may only want to look at their open calls. This view can be set in the Discovery Interface; so, it is readily accessible to the

One-minute manager.

Tivoli Decision Support satisfies the needs of different types of users with an environment that is highly-customizable.

The customizable nature of Tivoli Decision Support lends itself well to explorers who are continually viewing the enterprise’s data sources to discover trends and views.

Tourists also benefit from the customizable features of Tivoli Decision Support, which enable them to expand or limit the number of

pre-packaged views. Finally, One-minute managers appreciate the user-friendly Discovery Interface, which assists them in locating the view or sets of views they want to reference. Also, Tivoli Decision Support’s

(40)

push-delivery feature enables all users to receive updated views but is particularly helpful to the One-minute manager.

(41)

Chapter 3. Methodology

This chapter provides the reader with the recommended methodology that they should conform to in order to successfully plan, install, and configure the Tivoli Decision Support product. This chapter kicks off with an overview of the Tivoli Implementation Methodology (TIM), which has been branded as Tivoli’s best practice for identifying, designing, planning, installing, testing, and documenting a Tivoli Enterprise solution. Following the introduction to TIM, a recommended Tivoli Decision Support deployment process incorporating the structured procedure driven by the implementation methodology that TIM is based on will be presented to the reader.

3.1 Tivoli Implementation Methodology

The Tivoli Implementation Methodology (TIM) constitutes the methodology for successful deployments of Tivoli management software solutions. TIM uses structured, predictable, and repeatable processes, which result in efficient and effective deployments. Through the use of a set of documentation, guidelines, templates, and tools used to plan, develop, test, implement, and maintain Tivoli solutions, TIM is Tivoli’s best practice standard to:

• Understand a customer's system-management needs

• Select Tivoli management software that best addresses those needs • Enable the sales team to use the consultant organization's experience to

obtain accurate estimates of the effort required to implement the solution • Assist Tivoli Certified Consultants and project managers in planning,

designing, and implementing Tivoli solutions that meet customer needs • Test Tivoli Solutions

• Document Tivoli Solutions, thus, enabling customers to independently manage their systems

• Assist the customer support team in supporting the deployed Tivoli Solutions.

TIM is used by sales teams, project managers, architects, consultants, and account managers from both Tivoli Systems and approved Tivoli Business Partner consultant organizations.

TIM was developed by Tivoli consultants, architects, project managers, support staff, and developers. It captures the best practices framework-wide deployments of Tivoli Management Software. TIM provides standard

(42)

refined by Tivoli Professional Services and selected Business Partners. TIM is organized according to the Software Engineering Life Cycle model. This model addresses each element that is critical to the implementation of any software development activity. In Figure 8, a schematic overview of TIM is given.

Figure 8. TIM schematic overview

TIM provides standard verified methods for use by project managers and Tivoli-certified consultants to execute each phase of a Tivoli implementation. With this common deployment strategy, Tivoli and Tivoli’s business partners can provide:

(43)

• Efficient requirements analysis to generate an architecture and design for a solution

• Complete project planning and detailed design for a solution • Accelerated deployment of Tivoli solutions

• Detailed solution verification that lends itself to customer regression test activities

• Completed solution documentation that can be used by the customer, consultants, Tivoli support staff, and Tivoli development to ensure the long-term success of that solution

To find information on TIM, refer to the instructions in Appendix A, “Tivoli Implementation Methodology (TIM) 3.6” on page 185.

3.2 Implementing Tivoli Decision Support

In order to ensure that the process of deploying Tivoli Decision Support is in line with TIM, we will follow the process flow defined in the TIM methodology to detail each phase of the TDS implementation. Since our main focus in this chapter is the implementation, the methodology detailed below will only highlight those procedures that are significant to TDS. It is assumed that TDS has already been identified as the solution that the customer requires; so, we will not go into detail about the pre-sales and best-fit Tivoli product analysis exercises, which are part of the Sales Engagement phase.

3.2.1 Requirements gathering phase

Requirements gathering, as it relates to Tivoli Decision Support, is a systematic process of identifying a customer's reporting requirements in order for us to deliver a well-thought-out implementation of Tivoli’s decision-making software. With the aid of detailed questionnaires, the consultant services organization works with the customer to identify complete and accurate requirements for their reporting solution. This activity also helps the customer establish the proper expectations of the breadth and scope of the TDS solution.

In order to deliver a definitive TDS requirements document, we will tailor this requirements gathering phase to provide only the information necessary to define the scope, architecture, and estimated hours that will be required to implement the customer’s TDS solution. The objective of this segment is, therefore, to gather requirements that enable the following:

(44)

• A system architect to analyze the information and successfully create a System Architecture and Design document

• The consultant, business operations, project management, sales team, and the deployment team to work together, led by business operations, to develop a technical proposal

• A deployment project team to create a detailed project plan

Table 1 shows the input and output items, which highlight the components of the requirements-gathering phase:

Table 1. Requirements gathering phase items

Figure 9 outlines the process flow of the requirements-gathering phase:

Figure 9. Requirements gathering process flow

We will now take a look at the questionnaires shown in Figure 9. 3.2.1.1 Questionnaires

Questionnaires serve as the main tool for gathering a detailed description and logical picture of the customer’s environment. It is a tool that portrays the customer’s environment and high-level goals for reporting on his or her IT environment.

Gathering the customer-specific TDS requirements is the focal point of this exercise and will be investigated shortly. First, however, we must take a look at the systems management requirements of the customer in the form of the Customer Requirements Questionnaire.

Requirements gathering phase

Input Initial customer requirements questionnaire Output Tivoli decision support requirements questionnaires

Requirements Gathering Flow

INPUT Customer Requirements Questionaire TDS Requirements Questionaire OUTPUT

(45)

3.2.1.2 Initial customer requirements questionnaire

The information gathered in this report serves as the single input element of the implementation solution. Our aim is to process this information and produce other questionnaires and reports that will serve as inputs to the subsequent phases of the implementation cycle.

In this questionnaire, many business-specific questions are answered. The most important and valuable pieces of information gathered would be the customer reporting goals and issues. For example, the answers to the following types of questions will be available to us:

• What are the immediate Tivoli-specific goals of the customer? • What are the long-term Tivoli-specific goals of the customer? • What are the customer's general immediate goals with TDS? • What are the customer's general long-term goals with TDS?

From this information, the TDS consultant will be able to identify the reporting solution components that are significant to the customer’s business. He or she can now focus on the implementation of the product functions of Tivoli Decision Support and gather all the necessary TDS requirements.

3.2.1.3 Tivoli Decision Support requirements questionnaire Having manipulated the information received above, we are now ready to draw up a questionnaire to extract the TDS product-specific information. The TDS provider will set up an interview with the customer requesting the relevant business leaders as well as the IT technical leader to be present. This interview is broken up into four steps, which are shown in the list below. The purpose, requirements, and process of each step will be clearly

distinguished; furthermore, a set of suggested questions for the questionnaire will be proposed.

1. Decision-making/reporting requirements overview: • Purpose

It is during this step that Tivoli personnel acquire their initial information on the customer’s reporting requirements. It is assumed that the customer has an amateur solution in place and intends to migrate to Tivoli Decision Support. The customer will be questioned on his or her current reporting activities, and a document detailing his or her

requirements will be drawn up. • Required information

Details of what the customer expects from the Tivoli Decision Support solution, current process, procedure, service levels, reports, and any

(46)

product(s) associated with accomplishing their current reporting task (if any) are required information.

• Process

Document all customer expectations and reporting goals. Gather all existing reporting policies and procedures implemented by the customer. Review the customer's existing reporting policies and procedures to determine how data is collected and manipulated and what Tivoli Decision Support specifics need to be presented in order to migrate to this new reporting strategy.

• Suggested questions:

• What are the customer’s immediate report requirements? • What report requirements are forecast as future needs?

• What is your current reporting strategy, and what are the shortfalls? • Are you able to publish content to the Web?

• How often do you run your data mining and database interrogation procedures?

• Are any Tivoli products used to gather data for the current reporting solution?

2. Existing Tivoli systems management products installed: • Purpose

Tivoli Decision Support is dependent on various Tivoli products to perform its reporting task. It is assumed that the customer has either an existing Tivoli Systems Management solution implemented, or it is in the process of implementation in their environment.

• Required information

Tivoli Servers, Tivoli Products (including patch levels), installed Plus modules, TMR architecture, and Operating System platforms are required.

• Process

It is in the analysis phase that we will investigate how these existing policies and procedures can be migrated to Tivoli Decision Support

(47)

Gather all existing architecture and deployment documents (if available). Identify process flows, and systems management

procedures that the business is running with. Identify if Tivoli Decision Support dependent Tivoli products are installed for example,

Distributed Monitoring, Enterprise Console, Netview, Service Desk etc. • Suggested questions:

• Which systems management disciplines does your Tivoli solution integrate with? Describe the details of that integration including the flow of data and desktop configurations.

• Are there current architecture and deployment summary documents that describe the Tivoli deployment?

• If using a Master-Spoke TMR, where are the Spoke TMR Servers located? (For example, central data center, different geographic locations, one per branch office).

3. Determine hardware and operating system information

For this step, we basically need to get an idea of the existing hardware that is deployed at the customer site. We will use this information in the Systems Analysis to decide if it is possible to share the roles of some of these machines with Tivoli Decision Support.

• Purpose

The purpose is to gather a hardware and operating system inventory of all dedicated Systems Management machines as well as machines that need to be monitored.

• Required information

System-specific information is required. • Process

Review the Tivoli Decision Support hardware requirements with the customer. Processor, memory, monitor, and hard disk space of the existing hardware are some of the main issues that need to be covered. 4. Determine network-specific information

• Purpose

The purpose is to gather the following information to describe the network communication mechanisms used between the various components that may be used for the TDS deployment.

(48)

The customer should provide a network topology diagram. If the following information is not on the diagram, annotate the diagram or provide details:

• Line speed of each network connection.

• Actual network bandwidth. If it varies by time of day, define the typical averages.

• Each firewall between nodes.

• Each firewall's configuration, monitoring, and policies. • Socks configuration description.

• Protocols used within the current environment.

• Frame Relay (Committed Information Rate (CIR) and Burst Rate). • Suggested questions:

• Are all systems reachable via TCP/IP?

• Describe the host and IP address naming conventions and scheme used to identify networking and computer system equipment. • Is the TCP/IP routing structure static or dynamic?

• If DNS is used, provide a copy of the DNS map configuration. (Note that the integrity of these maps must be verified.) Describe how reverse lookups are performed.

• If DHCP or WINS is in use, identify the server and describe how these utilities are configured.

3.2.2 Systems analysis phase

During the Systems analysis phase, the TDS requirements that were gathered in the previous stage are processed. The goal of this system analysis is to provide a total reporting solution using Tivoli Decision Support that meets or exceeds customer expectations.

This solution includes the development and presentation of a proposal for TDS. Furthermore, the architecture and detailed design is completed, and the Statement of Work for the deployment of the solution is developed and presented to the customer.

The results of the questionnaires are now needed, and they serve as the main ingredient for systems analysis.

(49)

The input and output items shown in Table 2 highlight the components of the systems analysis phase:

Table 2. Systems analysis phase items

Figure 10 outlines The process flow of the Systems Analysis phase:

Figure 10. Systems Analysis process flow

3.2.2.1 Preparing for systems analysis

To create a TDS architecture, begin by translating the customer requirements and the proposals into a list of what functions and capabilities TDS must provide. Document this information so that it can be used to implement the technical solution.

As requirements are reviewed, carefully evaluate each customer requirement to ensure they have provided sufficient information to enable the analyst to meet these requirements using Tivoli Decision Support.

Also, if the customer accepted an action item to provide requirements information during the requirements gathering phase, ensure that the customer has supplied this information.

Once all the preparations have been completed, we can now be certain that focusing on customer requirements to create an architecture and design will ensure that the architecture and design is concise, and, thus, the deployment of the TDS solution will be successful.

Systems Analysis Phase

Input

Tivoli Decision Support Requirements Questionnaires Tivoli Decision Support Installation Guide

Output

Technical Proposal

System Architecture and Design Document

Systems Analysis Flow

Technical

Proposal OUTPUT

INPUT Preparation Mapping TDSGuides

Systems Architecture &

References

Related documents