• No results found

Does chronic smoking affect induced-exercise catecholamine release?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Does chronic smoking affect induced-exercise catecholamine release?"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Does chronic smoking affect induced-exercise catecholamine release?

İpekoğlu G

1*

, Sever O

2

,

Gönülateş S

3

, Akan Bayrakdar

4

,

Arslanoğlu

E

1

,

Arslanoğlu

C

1

, Mor A

1

, Çolakoğlu

FF

4

1Sinop University, Sports Sciences Faculty Turkey,([email protected]) 2Ataturk University, Sports Sciences Faculty,

Turkey,3Pamukkale University, Sports Sciences Faculty, Turkey4Gazi University, Sports Sciences Faculty, Turkey

ABSTRACT: Introduction and objectives: This study was performed to investigate the acute effect of the submaximal aerobic exercise upon

epinephrine and nor-epinephrine levels in chronic smokers and non-smoker. The study was carried out upon 10 regular (15> cigarettes/day) smoker

untrained male along five years and 10 never smoker untrained male. Methods: Subjects performed an endurance exercise that continues 40 minutes

at 70% maximal heart rate. There were 15cc venous blood samples extracted from the forearm pre-exercise (PRE), exercise (POST),

post-exercise 2 hours (2h), post-post-exercise 24 hours (24h) to measure of epinephrine and nor-epinephrine levels. Results: The plasma level of each hormone

increased after exercise and the tendency of rise was similar between groups as it seen in which 55,6% and 54,68% for epinephrine and 27,1% and

35,7% for norepinephrine. In this respect no group-time relationship has been found (p>0,05). But in between-group analyses, basal and after exercise

levels were different (p<0,05). Discussion and conclusion: The study revealed the fact that, smokers have higher plasma levels of epinephrine and

norepinephrine before and after exercise. The results demonstrate that long-term smoking induces elevate baseline and post-aerobic submaximal

exercise plasma epinephrine and nor-epinephrine levels. The sympatho-adrenal activity appears to be disrupt with long-term smoking which effect

the glycolytic and fat metabolism during exercise.

KEY WORDS: smoke, epinephrine, nor-epinephrine, aerobic exercise, catecholamines

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco kills approximately 6 million people which includes about

600,000 are also estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke

[1] and causes more than half a trillion dollars of economic damage each

year [2]. In total, tobacco use is responsible for the death of about 1 in 10

adults worldwide. Smoking is often the hidden cause of the disease

recorded as responsible for death. Even though notable progress has been

made in raising awareness of cigarettes in relation to cardiovascular and

lung diseases approximately 21,1%(36,9% males; 7,3% female) of the

world population still smoke. For Europe this rate is 29,6% according to

(2)

VOL. 5 (1)

ever smoked regularly compared to their nonathletic counterparts, there is

no sharp difference between them [3]. Besides even if the studies show

different results, it is seen that the use of smokeless nicotine is common in

athletes [4, 5] as well as tobacco smoking. This epidemic hazard points to

the importance of cigarette use and exercise-performance relationship.

Smoking cessation have important improvements on athletic performance.

For example oxygen cost of breathing decrease between %13-79 and

hearth rate lower %5-7 with smoking abstinence for habitual smokers after

one day [6] and air resistance increases three-fold after 15 puffs [7]. During

graded exercise testing on treadmill seven days smoking abstinence

produce significant reduction in hearth rate and increase performance by

the time to exhaustion [8]. In the long run, chronic cigarette smokers tend

to have lower fitness levels and sedentary lifestyles than counterparts [9].

Smoking enhances dependence on carbohydrate substrate for energy

supply in exercise for some reason and decreases lung capacity [10]. All

these findings reveal that while one day of abstinence decrease the cost of

breathing and enhance performance [10], it is well documented that there

are several important negative adaptations of long-term tobacco smoking

including lipid profiles, immune function, central adiposity, bone mineral

density and reproductive function [11]. Because of these adverse effects,

the response during exercise accumulated stress may be expected to react

differently in smokers than in non-smokers. In exercise many of hormones

are regulated via various regulatory axes including the hypothalamic–

pituitary–adrenal axis, the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis and the

hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis as the body transitions from resting to

an active state with the increase in metabolism. A major component in the

autonomic control during exercise is the adrenergic activity [12].

Adrenergic means the nervous system that uses epinephrine or

norepinephrine as its neurotransmitter. The adrenal medulla is the

innermost part of the adrenal gland which is responsible for epinephrine,

norepinephrine and peptide F secretion with the stimulation of sympathetic

nerves [13] and neuronal terminals of the preganglionic sympathetic nerves

are mostly responsible for secretion of nor-epinephrine [14]. In basal and

homeostatic state these hormones usually stay fixed. Although there are

different responses in chronic and acute use, cigarette smoking affects the

release of hormones acting in these axis for a variety of reasons. When

smoke is inhaled it enters the blood stream, crosses the blood–brain barrier,

reaches the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system where it

acts as a stimulant [15]. For example activation of nicotinic receptors in

chromaffin cells and neurons allows secretion of catecholamine from

postganglionic sympathetic neurons and adrenal medulla [16]. During

smoking, due to an increase in plasma nicotine levels, neurotransmitter and

neuroendocrine disturbances occur. Correlative hormonal response and the

increase in catecholamine is also emerge due to the exercise-induced

metabolic stress. Based upon these findings it is hypothesized that during

submaximal aerobic exercise this chronic negative effect of tobacco

smoking will turn into a different and abnormal hormonal response in

chronic users compared to non-smoking counterparts.

METHODS

Ten regular smokers (27,7 ± 6,4 age, 184,2 ± 6,6 cm, 82,5 ± 11,6 kg) for

five years (>15 cigarettes per day) and ten non-smokers (30,7 ± 4,6 age,

178,0 ± 6,8 cm, 82,7 ± 12,0 kg) participated in this study. The subjects with

any symptoms (hypertension, thyroid, diabetes, cardiac etc.) and those

involved any training program was not included in study.

Subjects performed an endurance exercise on treadmill (Dunlop EL900)

that continues 40 minutes in 70% maximal heart rate–

(approximately%55-63 MaxVO2) (Pollock et al., 1998). To verify and record the duration and

intensity of exercise, participants wore a heart rate monitor (Polar RS400,

Polar, Kempele, Finland). There were 15 cc venous blood samples

extracted from the forearm pre-exercise (PRE) and post-exercise (POST)

to measure plasma epinephrine and nor-epinephrine levels. The blood

samples were first centrifuged at a rate of 5000 revolution/minute and the

upper phases were transferred to eppendorf tubes and kept at -80 C until

the use [17]. Serum epinephrine and nor-epinephrine levels of all subjects

were analyzed PRE-POST. Concentrations were studied with the immuno

chemiluminescence method using the DiaSorin Liaison auto analyzer kit.

The participants were given detailed information about the objectives of

the study in accordance to the Helsinki Medical Declaration and they gave

their full content. This study was carried out according to the approval of

Selçuk University Faculty of Sports Science Non Enterprising Ethical

Committee.

Distributions of the variables according to the groups were analyzed and

the normality of the distribution and the homogeneity of the variances were

determined with the Mauchly’ Sphericity Test and Levene test.

Within-group and smoking-effect analysis were carried out with the repeated

measures ANOVA and between-group analysis were carried out with

Mann-Whitney U tests, level of significance was accepted as 0,05.

STATISTICAL RESULTS

Descriptive statistics of non-smoker and smoker groups has been given in

the table above. The equality of variances and anthropometric differences

between groups analyzed with Levene test and independent samples t-test.

According to results which is not shown in table there is no between group

difference in any measured data (p>0,05) (Table 1).

The plasma level of each hormone increased after exercise and the tendency

of rise was similar between groups as it seen in which 55,6% and 54,68%

for epinephrine and 27,1% and 35,7% for norepinephrine. In this respect

no group-time relationship has been found (p>0,05). But in between-group

analyses, basal and after exercise levels were different (p<0,05). Smokers

have higher plasma levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine before and

(3)

VOL. 5 (1)

18

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for smokers and non-smokers.

n Min. Max. Mean Std. Dev.

Non-Smoker

Age

10

23,0 37,0 30,7 4,6

Weight (kg) 64,7 107,2 82,7 12,0

Height (cm) 167,0 192,0 178,1 6,8

BMI 19,7 31,0 25,9 3,4

BFP (%) 10,2 24,1 18,5 4,9

Smoker

Age

10

21,0 38,0 27,7 6,4

Weight (kg) 65,6 101,0 82,5 11,6

Height (cm) 175,0 195,0 184,2 6,6

BMI 20,2 28,0 24,2 2,4

BFP (%) 11,4 20,8 15,3 3,0

Table 2. Between-group and within-group comparisons of pre-post endurance training epinephrine and nor-epinephrine values

EPINEPHRINE n Pre Post Difference time*group p

Mean sd mean sd diff. %

Non-Smokers 10

10

0,175 0,066 0,273 0,172 0,098* 55,644

0,462 0,505

Smokers 0,268 0,054 0,414 0,139 0,147* 54,685

z -2,844* -1,965*

p 0,004 0,049

NOR-EPINEPHRINE

Non-Smokers 10

10

1,974 0,581 2,509 0,778 0,535* 27,102

2,035 0,171

Smokers 2,933 0,346 3,982 0,618 1,049* 35,765

z -3,326* -3,322*

p 0,001 0,001

*: within group difference is significant p<0,05 sd: standard deviation, diff: difference

DISCUSSION

Pre-exercise basal plasma epinephrine and nor-epinephrine levels were

high in untrained smokers than smokers. Likewise, post-exercise plasma

hormone levels are also higher in smokers. Smoking appears to induce

increased sympathetic discharge and leads to an increase in plasma levels

of both the adrenomedullary hormone epinephrine and the sympathetic

neurotransmitter norepinephrine [18, 19, 20]. At the cellular level nicotine

acts by binding to and activating the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the

brain and in the adrenal medulla which leads to increased catecholamine

levels with corresponding cardiovascular and metabolic responses [15]. In

another study, it was explained by effect of long-term cigarette smoking on

beta-adrenoceptor density and catecholamine response. The density of

(4)

VOL. 5 (1)

twins compared with their nonsmoking cotwins [19]. In another study

beta-adreno receptor blockade significantly reduced oxygen consumption in

nonsmokers but not in smokers who also incurred a significantly greater

oxygen debt and had higher serum lactate levels[21]. These findings

explain the mechanism which leads to have more secreted plasma

catecholamine in smokers.

In the present study, both hormones elevated post-exercise for both groups.

The increment in plasma catecholamine levels with both aerobic [22, 23,

24, 20] and anaerobic exercise [25, 26] has been demonstrated in many

studies. In the present study, the duration of the exercise was 40 minutes or

until exhaustion with the intensity of %70 HRmax which was almost equal

to 65-70% of VO2max for untrained subjects [27]. Studies with similar

intensity show parallel catecholamine responses [22, 23, 28].

On the other hand, the relationship of catecholamine increment with

exercise in terms of tobacco smoking has not been well studied. The plasma

increment tendency was similar for non-smokers and smokers respectively

55,6% and 54,68% for epinephrine and 27,1% and 35,7% for

norepinephrine during submaximal aerobic effort. Chronic smoking habit,

did not make a significant difference in the hormonal responses during

exercise. In a previous study epinephrine and nor-epinephrine did not

significantly elevated with exercise for smokers and non-smokers but the

total catecholamine level, expressed as epinephrine plus norepinephrine,

was significantly elevated in smokers compared with nonsmokers at rest in

the basal state and at peak heart rate (85% of age-adjusted maximal heat

rate) [19]. In the present study the total amount of epinephrine and

nor-epinephrine also did not make a significant difference between smokers and

non-smokers (not shown in statistical analyses). The exercise intensity

(increased in steps of 50 W to reach a heart rate corresponding to 85% of

the age-adjusted maximum, continued approximately 10 min in previous

study) or the statistical method used might be the conflict of these two

studies in catecholamine responses. Although the trend is similar, it was

seen that the level of catecholamine is higher in smokers. This suggests that

catecholamine sensitivity is decreased in smokers [19]. Catecholamine

effect on plasma free fatty acid circulation has been shown to decrease in

smokers [19] which may enhance dependence on carbohydrate substrate

for energy supply in exercise [10].

In summary, the present study shows that long-term smoking induces

elevate baseline and post-aerobic submaximal exercise epinephrine and

nor-epinephrine plasma levels. The sympatho-adrenal activity appears to

be disrupt with long-term smoking which effect the glycolytic and fat

metabolism during exercise

.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Thanks to all the healthy subjects who participated. The authors also thank

Fatmanur Er, Ceren Suveren Erdoğan and nurses who contributed to the

volunteer’s enrollments, taking blood samples and laboratory work.None of

the authors have any potential conflicts of interest associated with this

research.

REFERENCES

1.

WHO (2015) Global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco smoking.

2.

WHO (2013) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic.

3.

Davis, TC., Arnold, C., Nandy, I., Bocchini, JA., Gottlieb, A., et al., Tobacco use among male high school athletes.

Journal of Adolescent Health, 1997.21: p. 97

101.

4.

Chaabane, Z., Murlasits, Z., Mahfoud, Z., Goebel, R., Tobacco Use and Its Health Effects among Professional

Athletes in Qatar. Canadian Respiratory Journal, 2016.2016: p. 1

5.

5.

Melnick, MJ., Miller, KE., Sabo, DF., Farrell, MP., Barnes, GM., Tobacco use among high school athletes and

nonathletes: Results of the 1997 youth risk behavior s. Adolescence. Winter, 2001.36: p. 727.

6.

Rode, A. and RJ. Shephard, The influence of cigarette smoking upon the oxygen cost of breathing in near-maximal

exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports, 1971.3: p. 51

55.

7.

Nadel, JA. and JHJ. Comroe, Acute effects of inhalation of cigarette smoke on airway conductance. J Appl Physiol,

1961.16: p. 713

716.

8.

Hashizume, K., Yamaji, K., Kusaka, Y., Kawahara, K., Effects of abstinence from cigarette smoking on the

cardiorespiratory capacity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2000.32: p.386

391.

9.

Sidney, S., Sternfeld, B., Gidding, SS., Jacobs, DRJ., Bild, DE., et. al., Cigarette smoking and submaximal exercise

test duration in a biracial population of young adults: the CARDIA study. Medicine and Science in Sports and

Exercise, 1993.25: p. 911

916.

10.

McArdle, WD. and KI. Katch, Exercise Physiology: Nutrition, Energy, and Human Performance. 2009:

Philadelphia.

11.

Steptoe, A., M. Ussher, Smoking, cortisol and nicotine. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2005.59: p.

228-235.

12.

Kjaer, M. Adrenal Gland: Fight or Flight Implications for Exercise and Sports. In The Endocrine System in Sports

and Exercise. 2005: Oxford, p. 194

199.

(5)

VOL. 5 (1)

20

Sports and Exercise. 2005: Oxford, p. 200

216.

14.

Ball, D. Metabolic and endocrine response to exercise: sympathoadrenal integration with skeletal muscle. The

Journal of Endocrinology, 2015.224: p. 79-95.

15.

Tweed, JO., Hsia, SH., Lutfy, K., Friedman, TC., The endocrine effects of nicotine and cigarette smoke. Trends in

Endocrinology and Metabolism , 2012.23: p. 334

342.

16.

Yıldız

, L. and H.

Kılıç

, The clinical and biochemical effects of cigarette smoking. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of

Medical Sciences 2000.20: p. 306

312.

17.

Colakoglu, FF., Cayci, B., Yaman, M., Karacan, S.

, Gonulateş S

., et al., The effects of the intake of an isotonic sports

drink before orienteering competitions on skeletal muscle damage. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2016.28: p.

3200-3204.

18.

Cryer, PE., Haymond, MW., Santiago, JV., Shah, SD., Norepinephrine and Epinephrine Release and Adrenergic

Mediation of Smoking-Associated Hemodynamic and Metabolic Events. New England Journal of Medicine,

1976.295: 573

577.

19.

Laustiola, KE., Lassila, R., Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M. Decreased Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Density and

Catecholamine Response in Male Cigarette Smokers A Study of Monozygotic Twin Pairs Discordant for Smoking.

Circulation, 1988.78: p. 1233

1240.

20.

Zouhal, H., Jacob, C., Delamarche, P., Gratas-Delamarche, A., Catecholamines and the effects of exercise, training

and gender. Sports Medicine, 2008.38: p. 401

423.

21.

Penny, WJ., Mir, MA., Cardiorespiratory response to exercise before and after acute beta-adrenoreceptor blockade

in nonsmokers and chronic smokers. International Journal of Cardiology, 1986.11: p. 293

304.

22.

Favier, R., Pequignot, JM., Desplanches, D., Mayet, MH., Lacour, JR., et al., Catecholamines and metabolic

responses to submaximal exercise in untrained men and women. European Journal of Applied Physiology and

Occupational Physiology, 1983.50: p. 393

403.

23.

Galbo, H., Holst, JJ., Christensen, NJ., Glucagon and plasma catecholamine responses to graded and prolonged

exercise in man. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1975.38: p. 70

76.

24.

Kjaer, M., Secher, NH., Galbo, H., Physical stress and catecholamine release.

Bailliere’s Clinical Endocrinology

and Metabolism, 1987.1: p. 279

298.

25.

Bush, JA., Kraemer, WJ., Mastro, AM., Triplett-McBride, NT., Volek, JS., et al., Exercise and recovery responses

of adrenal medullary neurohormones to heavy resistance exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,

1999.31: p. 554-559.

26.

Kindermann, W., Schnabel, A., Schmitt, WM., Biro, G., Cassens, J., et al., Catecholamines, growth hormone,

cortisol, insulin, and sex hormones in anaerobic and aerobic exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology and

Occupational Physiology, 1982.49: p. 389

399.

27.

Pollock, ML., Gaesser, GA., Butcher, JD., Després, J., Dishman, RK., et al., American College of Sports Medicine

Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory

and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1998.30: p. 975

991.

Figure

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for smokers and non-smokers.

References

Related documents

This application is to be submitted to the Dean of Graduate Studies during the term in which you have passed the comprehensive examination and fulfilled any language or research

The specimens fabricated with aluminum powder and this water–cement ratio have the highest porosity of connected voids compared with other specimens fabricated with a

The advantage of these surveys is that they do not only rely on “weak” data of consumers but also on “measured” data (eg. sales information, marketing information etc.) The

In a field study, after water flowed over all three manure sources and then PAM, PAM + Al(SO 4 ) 3 , or PAM + CaO in furrows, total conform bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, and

Norges Bank ReFIT meeting, Oslo Norway January 2014 CAMA-CAMP Commodities and the Macroeconomy Workshop, Canberra Australia December 2013 Reserve Bank of New Zealand

have onsidered various ranking models as voters whih an rank DMUs from the top to the end. and DMUs as andidates, and tried to obtain a full rank from

Drug release through cellulose dialysis membrane showed diffusion controlled release pattern and drug deposition studies using rat abdominal skin exhibited significant

This study focused on the differential pressure set point values prediction for setting automatic line control valves installed on a gas pipeline.. The effect of