• No results found

Comparison of cross sectional optical coherence tomography images of elevated optic nerve heads across acquisition devices and scan protocols

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Comparison of cross sectional optical coherence tomography images of elevated optic nerve heads across acquisition devices and scan protocols"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1 An image of a non-swollen optic nerve with semi-manual segmentations completed using custom MATLAB-based software
Fig. 2 Approximately 9-mm OCT line scans oriented to intersect the fovea and the center of the optic nerve
Fig. 4 Inter-rater segmentation variability (segmentation within the cup of the optic nerve due to a possible artifact
Table 1 Intra-class correlation coefficients for absolute agreementof optic nerve cross sectional area calculated OCT B-scanscentered on the optic nerve head
+3

References

Related documents

The proffered cost function is expressed in terms of peak time, percentage overshoot, settling time, rise time, and steady-state error of the unit step response..

It must be noted that according to vast com- munications of World Wide Web each node can communicate with other nodes that follow from the protocols of distributed system. The cost

Our implementation, based on a novel highly optimized version of the popular CLLL LR algorithm, uses pipelined multi- stage architecture to produce an LR-reduced matrix every

He has extensive experience of large scale research projects having worked as Principal Investigator and co-applicant on a number of funded studies including: National Evaluation

The model was originally published in Harvard Business Review issue 57 (pages 86-93, March 1979) in an article “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy”. The theory was dealt more

Our study system allowed us to evaluate lesser prairie- chicken populations from a landscape perspective in an area dominated by public and private rangelands that vary in grazing

Coyote depreda- tion rates appear to be influenced by sheep management practices, coyote biology and behavior, environmental fac- tors, and depredation management programs..