• No results found

m ˆ m m m ˆ ˆ ˆ m m ˆ ˆ m m ˆ ˆ m m m ˆ ˆ ˆ m m ˆ ˆ On -T , -T , -T , -R , -R Spaces m m m m m ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "m ˆ m m m ˆ ˆ ˆ m m ˆ ˆ m m ˆ ˆ m m m ˆ ˆ ˆ m m ˆ ˆ On -T , -T , -T , -R , -R Spaces m m m m m ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

On µ ˆ -T

0

, µ ˆ -T

1

, µ ˆ -T

2

, µ ˆ -R

0

, µ ˆ -R

1

Spaces

S. PIOUS MISSIER1 and E. SUCILA2

1Department of Mathematics,

V.O. Chidambaram College, Tuticorin, INDIA.

2Department of Mathematics,

G. Venkataswamy Naidu College, Kovilpatti, INDIA.

(Received on: June 5, 2013) ABSTRACT

M.K.R.S. Veerakumar introduced µ-closed sets in topological space. Using µ-closed sets recently S.Pious Missier and E.Sucila have defined and studied the notions of

µ ˆ

-closed and

µ ˆ

-opensets in topological spaces. In this paper, we introduce and investigate

µ ˆ

-Ti, i = 0,1,2 and

µ ˆ

-Ri, i = 1,2 using these

µ ˆ

-opensets in topological spaces.

Keywords:

µ ˆ

-Ti (i = 0,1,2) spaces,

µ ˆ

-Ri(i = 1,2) spaces, semi symmetric, always

µ ˆ

-open map,

µ ˆ

-irresolute map.

2000 Mathematics Subject code Classification: 54B40, 54C05, 54D05.

1. INTRODUCTION

In 1963, the concept of semiopen sets in topology was introduced by N.

Levine3. In4, N. Levine generalized the concept of closed set to generalized closed set. The concept of semi-Ti, i = 0,1,2 spaces has been defined by S.N. Maheshwari and R.Prasad in5, which is weaker than Ti, i = 0,1,2 spaces. The notion of µ-closed sets was introduced by M.K.R.S. Veerakumar11. Recently the authors introduced8

µ ˆ

-closed

sets in topological spaces using µ-closed set.

In this paper, we introduce and investigate

µ ˆ

-Ti, i = 1,2,3 and

µ ˆ

-Ri, i = 1,2 using

µ ˆ

- open sets in topology. Further, we study their basic properties and preservation theorems of these new spaces.

2. PRELIMINARIES

Throughout this paper, by (X, τ), (Y, σ) (or simply X and Y), we always mean topological spaces on which no separations

(2)

axioms are assumed unless explicity stated.

Let A be a subset of X. The interior and closure of A in X are denoted by int(A) and cl(A) respectively. The following definitions and results are useful in the sequel.

Definition: 2.1

A subset A of a topological space (X,τ) is called:

1. semiopen3 if A ⊆ cl(int(A)) 2. α-open7 if A ⊆ int(cl(int(A)))

The complement of semi-open (resp.

α-open) set is called semi closed (resp. α- closed). The intersection of all semiclosed (resp. α-closed) sets containing a subset A of X is called semiclosure (resp. α-closure) of A is denoted by scl(A) (resp. αcl(A)).

Definition: 2.2

A subset A of a topological space (X, τ) is called

1. gα*-closed6 if αcl(A) ⊆ int(U) whenever A ⊆ U and U is α-open in (X, τ). The complement of gα*-closed set is called gα*-open.

2. µ-closed set [11] if cl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is gα*-open in (X, τ).

The complement of µ-closed set is called µ-openset.

3.

µ ˆ

-closed8 if scl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is µ-open in (X, τ). The complement of

µ ˆ

-closed set is called

µ ˆ

-openset.

The class of

µ ˆ

-closed subsets of X is denoted by

µ ˆ

c(X, τ) and the class of

µ ˆ

- open subsets of X is denoted by

µ ˆ

o(X, τ)8.

The intersection of all

µ ˆ

-closed sets

containing a subset A of X is called

µ ˆ

-closure of A is denoted by

µ ˆ

cl(A)9. Definition : 2.3

A space X is said to be : 1. semi-T0

5 if for each pair of distinct points in X, there is an semi-openset containing one of the points but not the other.

2. semi-T1

5 if for each pair of distinct points x and y of X, there exists semi- open sets U and V containing x and y respectively such that y ∉ U and x ∉ V.

3. semi-T2

5 if for each pair of distinct points x and y of X, there exist disjoint semi-open sets U and V containing x and y respectively.

4. semi-R0

2 if for each semi-openset G in X and x ∈ G such that scl({x}) ⊂ G.

5. semi-R1

2 if for x, y ∈ X with scl({x}) ≠ scl({y}), there exist disjoint semi-open sets U and V such that scl({x}) ⊂ U and scl({y}) ⊂ V.

Definition: 2.4

A mapping f : X → Y is said to be always α-open1 if the image of every α- openset of X is an α-openset in Y.

Definition: 2.5

A mapping f : X → Y is called an

µ ˆ

-continuous9 if the inverse image of each openset in Y is an

µ ˆ

-openset in X.

Definition: 2.6

A mapping f : X → Y is called

µ ˆ

- irresolute [10] if the inverse image of each

µ ˆ

-openset in Y is an

µ ˆ

-openset in X.

(3)

3. ON

µ ˆ

-T0 SPACES

We introduce the following definition.

Definition 3.1

A topological space (X, τ) is said to be

µ ˆ

-T0, if for each pair of distinct points x, y of X, there exists an

µ ˆ

-openset containing one point but not the other. Clearly every semi-T0 space is

µ ˆ

-T0, since every semiopen set in X is

µ ˆ

-open in X.

However the converse is not true in general as shown by the Example 3.2.

Example: 3.2

Let X = {a, b, c} and τ = {X, ϕ, {a}, {b, c}}. Here X is

µ ˆ

-T0 but not semi– T0, since there is no semiopen set containing b but not containing c.

The following Theorem 3.3 characterizes

µ ˆ

-T0 spaces.

Theorem: 3.3

A space X is an

µ ˆ

-T0 space if and only if

µ ˆ

-closures of distinct points are distinct.

Proof:

Let x, y ∈ X with x ≠ y and X be an

µ ˆ

-T0 space. We shall show that

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ≠

µ ˆ

cl({y}). Since X is

µ ˆ

-T0 space, there exists an

µ ˆ

-open set G such that x ∈ G and y ∉ G. Also x ∉ X – G and y ∈ X – G where X – G is

µ ˆ

-closed set in X. Since

µ ˆ

cl({y}) is the intersection of all

µ ˆ

-closed sets which

contain y, y ∈

µ ˆ

cl({y}) but x ∉

µ ˆ

cl({y}) as x ∉ X – G. Therefore

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ≠

µ ˆ

cl({y}).

Conversely, suppose that for any pair of distinct points x, y ∈ X,

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ≠

µ ˆ

cl({y}). Then there exists atleast one point

z ∈ X such that z ∈

µ ˆ

cl({x}) but z ∉

µ ˆ

cl({y}). We claim that x ∉

µ ˆ

cl({y}).

If x ∈

µ ˆ

cl({y}), then

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂

µ ˆ

cl({y}). So z ∈

µ ˆ

cl({y}), which is a contradiction. Hence x ∉

µ ˆ

cl({y}). Now x ∉

µ ˆ

cl({y}) ⇒ x ∈ X-

µ ˆ

cl({y}), which is an

µ ˆ

-openset in X containing x but not y.

Hence x is an

µ ˆ

-T0 space.

Definition: 3.4

A mapping f : X → Y is said to be

always

µ ˆ

-open if the image of every

µ ˆ

-openset of X is

µ ˆ

-open in Y.

Proposition: 3.5

The property of a space being

µ ˆ

-T0

is preserved under one-one, onto and always

µ ˆ

-open mapping.

Proof:

Let X be a

µ ˆ

-T0 space and Y be a topological space. Let f : X → Y be a one- one, onto, always

µ ˆ

-open mapping from X to Y. Let u, v ∈ Y with u ≠ v. Since f is one- one onto, there exists distinct points x, y ∈ X such that f(x) = u, f(y) = v. Since X is an

µ ˆ

-T0 space, there exists

µ ˆ

-openset G in X such that x ∈ G and y ∉ G. Since f is always

µ ˆ

-open, f(G) is an

µ ˆ

-openset in

(4)

Y containing f(x) = u but not containing f(y)

= v. Thus there exists an

µ ˆ

-open set f(G) in Y such that u ∈ f(G) but v ∉ f(G) and hence Y is an

µ ˆ

-T0 space.

4. ON

µ ˆ

-T1 SPACES

In this section, we define

µ ˆ

-T1

spaces and discuss its properties.

Definition: 4.1

A space X is said to be

µ ˆ

-T1, if for each pair of distinct points x, y of X, there exists a pair of

µ ˆ

-opensets, one containing x but not y and the other containing y but not x.

It is easy to verify the following.

(i) Every semi–T1 space is an

µ ˆ

-T1 space.

(ii) Every

µ ˆ

-T1 space is an

µ ˆ

-T0 space.

The converses of the above two statements are not true as shown by the examples.

Example: 4.2

Let X = {a, b, c} and τ = {X, ϕ, {a}, {b, c}}. Then X is an

µ ˆ

-T1 space but not semi-T1 space, since there is no semi openset containing b but not containing c.

Example: 4.3

Let X = {a, b, c} and τ = {X, ϕ, {a}, {a, c}}. Then, X is an

µ ˆ

-T0 space but not an

µ ˆ

-T1, since for distinct point a and b of X there is no pair of

µ ˆ

-opensets containing one point but not the other.

Theorem: 4.4

A space X is an

µ ˆ

-T1 space if {x} is

µ ˆ

-closed in X for every x ∈ X.

Proof :

Let x, y be two distinct points of X such that {x} and {y} are

µ ˆ

-closed in X.

Then X – {x} and X – {y} are

µ ˆ

-open in X such that y ∈ X – {x} but x ∉ X – {x} and x

∈ X–{y} but y ∉ X – {y}. Hence, X is an

µ ˆ

-T1 space.

Theorem: 4.5

If {x} is

µ ˆ

-closed for each x in X and scl({x}) is µ-closed for each x in X then a space X is semi-symmetric.

Proof:

Suppose x ∈ scl({y}) and y ∉ scl({x}). Since y ∈ X – scl({x}) and scl({x}) is µ-closed implies X-scl({x}) is µ-open also {y} is

µ ˆ

-closed by definition of

µ ˆ

-closed, scl({y}) ⊂ X – scl({x}). Thus x ∈ X – scl({x}), a contradiction.

Next, we have the following invariant properties.

Theorem: 4.6

Let f : X → Y be an

µ ˆ

-irresolute, injective map. If Y is

µ ˆ

-T1, then X is

µ ˆ

-T1. Proof:

Assume that Y is

µ ˆ

-T1. Let x, y ∈ X be such that x ≠ y. Then there exists a pair of

µ ˆ

-opensets U, V in Y such that f(x)∈U,

f(y)∈V and f(x)∉V, f(y)∉U. Then x ∈ f-1(U), y ∈ f-1(V), x ∉ f-1(V) and y ∉ f-

1(U). Since f is

µ ˆ

-irresolute, X is

µ ˆ

-T1.

(5)

5. ON

µ ˆ

-T2 SPACES Definition: 5.1

A space X is said to be

µ ˆ

-T2, if for each pair of distinct points x, y of X, there exist disjoint

µ ˆ

-opensets U and V such that x ∈ U and y ∈ V.

Clearly the following holds.

Every semi-T2 space is an

µ ˆ

-T2

space. However the converse is not true in general as shown by the example.

Example: 5.2

The space defined in Example 4.2 is an

µ ˆ

-T2 space but not an semi-T2 space, since the semi-openset {b, c} containing both b and c of X.

Also every

µ ˆ

-T2 space is

µ ˆ

-T1

space.

We have the following invariant properties.

Theorem: 5.3

Let f : X → Y be an

µ ˆ

-irresolute and injective. If Y is

µ ˆ

-T2, then X is

µ ˆ

-T2. Proof :

Similar to Theorem 4.6.

The following theorem 5.4 gives characterizations of

µ ˆ

-T2 spaces.

Theorem: 5.4

In a space X, the following statements are equivalent.

(a) X is

µ ˆ

-T2.

(b) For each y ≠ x ∈ X, there exists an

µ ˆ

-

openset U such that x ∈ U and y ∉

µ ˆ

cl(U).

(c) For each x ∈ X , ∩ {

µ ˆ

cl(U) / U is

µ ˆ

- open in X and x ∈ U} = {x}.

(d) The diagonal ∆ = {(x, x)/ x ∈ X} is

µ ˆ

- closed in X × X.

Proof:

(a) ⇒ (b) : Assume that the space X is

µ ˆ

- T2. Let x, y ∈ X such that y ≠ x. Then there are disjoint

µ ˆ

-opensets U and V in X such that x ∈ U and y ∈ V. Clearly X – V is

µ ˆ

-closed such that

µ ˆ

cl(U) ⊂ X – V, y ∉ X – V and therefore y ∉

µ ˆ

cl(U).

(b) ⇒ (c) : Assume that for each y ≠ x, there exists an

µ ˆ

-openset U such that x ∈ U and y ∉

µ ˆ

cl(U). So, y ∉∩ {

µ ˆ

cl(U) / U is

µ ˆ

-open in X and x ∈ U} = {x}.

(c) ⇒ (d) : We claim that X - ∆ is

µ ˆ

-open in X × X. Let (x, y) ∉ ∆. Then y ≠ x.

Since ∩ {

µ ˆ

cl(U)/ U is

µ ˆ

-open in X and x ∈U} = {x}, there is some

µ ˆ

- openset U in X with x ∈ U and y ∉

µ ˆ

cl(U)). Since U ∩ (X -

µ ˆ

cl(U)) = ϕ, U × (X -

µ ˆ

cl(U)) is an

µ ˆ

- open set such that (x, y) ∈ U × (X -

µ ˆ

cl(U)) ⊂ X – ∆. Hence ∆ is

µ ˆ

-closed in X × X.

(d) ⇒ (a) : If y ≠ x, then (x, y) ∉ ∆ and thus there exist

µ ˆ

-open sets U and V such that (x, y) ∈ U × V and (U × V) ∩∆ = ϕ. Thus, for the

µ ˆ

-open sets U and V, we have x ∈ U, y ∈ V and U ∩ V = ϕ. Hence X is

µ ˆ

-T2.

(6)

Remark: 5.5

From the above Propositions and Examples, we have the following diagram.

Here A → B represents A implies B but not conversely.

In 1975, S. N. Maheshwari and R. Prasad5 have shown that the following implications hold.

T2 semi-T2

T1 semi-T1

T0 semi-T0

Now the authors have shown that the following implications hold.

T2 semi-T2

µ ˆ

-T2

T1 semi-T1

µ ˆ

-T1

T0 semi-T0

µ ˆ

-T0

6. ON

µ ˆ

-R0 SPACES AND

µ ˆ

-R1 SPACES

In this section, we define

µ ˆ

-R0

spaces and

µ ˆ

-R1 spaces and study some of the properties.

Definition: 6.1

A space X is called an

(i)

µ ˆ

-R0 space if

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ U whenever U is

µ ˆ

-open set and x ∈ U.

(ii)

µ ˆ

-R1 space if for x, y ∈ X with

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ≠

µ ˆ

cl({y}), then there exist disjoint

µ ˆ

-open sets U and V such that

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ U and

µ ˆ

cl({y}) ⊂ V.

Remark: 6.2

Every

µ ˆ

-R1 space is an

µ ˆ

-R0

space.

Proposition: 6.3

A topological space (X, τ) is

µ ˆ

-R0

then for any F ∈

µ ˆ

c(X, τ), x ∉ F implies F ⊂ U and x ∉ U for some U ∈

µ ˆ

o(X, τ).

Proof:

Suppose that F ∈

µ ˆ

c(X, τ) and x ∉ F. Then x ∈ X – F also. X – F is

µ ˆ

-open.

Since (X, τ) is

µ ˆ

-R0,

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ X – F. Set U = X -

µ ˆ

cl({x}) then U ∈

µ ˆ

o(X, τ), F ⊂ U and x ∉ U.

Proposition: 6.4

A topological space (X, τ) is

µ ˆ

-R0

then for any nonempty set A and G ∈

µ ˆ

o(X, τ) such that A ∩ G ≠ ϕ, there

exists F ∈

µ ˆ

c(X, τ) such that A ∩ F ≠ϕ and F ⊂ G.

Proof:

Let A be a nonempty set of X and G

µ ˆ

o(X, τ) such that A ∩ G ≠ ϕ. There exists x ∈ A ∩ G. Since x ∈ G ∈

µ ˆ

o(X, τ),

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ G. Set F =

µ ˆ

cl({x}), then F ∈

µ ˆ

c(X, τ), F ⊂ G and A ∩ F ≠ ϕ.

(7)

Proposition: 6.5

A topological space (X, τ) is

µ ˆ

-R0

space if and only if for any x and y in X,

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ≠

µ ˆ

cl({y}) implies

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ∩

µ ˆ

cl({y}) = ϕ.

Proof:

Necessity: Suppose that (X, τ) is

µ ˆ

-R0 and x, y ∈ X such that

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ≠

µ ˆ

cl({y}).

Then, there exists z ∈

µ ˆ

cl({x}) such that z

µ ˆ

cl({y}) (or z ∈

µ ˆ

cl({y}) such that z ∉

µ ˆ

cl({x}). There exists V ∈

µ ˆ

o(X, τ) such that y ∉ V and z ∈ V, hence x ∈ V. Therefore we have x ∉

µ ˆ

cl({y}). Thus x ∈ X -

µ ˆ

cl({y}) ∈

µ ˆ

o(X, τ), sinceX is

µ ˆ

-R0,

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ X -

µ ˆ

cl({y}) and

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ∩

µ ˆ

cl({y}) = ϕ. The proof for otherwise is similar.

Sufficiency: Let V

µ ˆ

o(X, τ) and let x ∈ V. Now we will show that

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ V.

Let y ∉ V(ie) y ∈ X – V. Then x ≠ y and x

µ ˆ

cl({y}). This shows that

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ≠

µ ˆ

cl({y}). By assumption

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ∩

µ ˆ

cl({y}) = ϕ. Hence y ∉

µ ˆ

cl({x}). Therefore

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ V.

Theorem : 6.6

The following properties are equivalent for a space X.

(a) X is an

µ ˆ

- R0 space.

(b) x ∈

µ ˆ

cl({y}) if and only if y ∈

µ ˆ

cl({x}) for points x and y in X.

Proof :

(a) ⇒ (b). Suppose X is

µ ˆ

-R0. Let x ∈

µ ˆ

cl({y}) and U be any

µ ˆ

-openset such that y ∈ U. By hypothesis, x ∈ U.

Therefore, every

µ ˆ

-openset containing y contains x. Hence y ∈

µ ˆ

cl({x}).

(b) ⇒ (a). Let V be an

µ ˆ

-openset and x ∈ V. If y ∉ V, then x ∉

µ ˆ

cl({y})and hence y ∉

µ ˆ

cl({x}). This implies that

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ V. Hence X is

µ ˆ

-R0. Theorem: 6.7

If a space X is

µ ˆ

-R1 and

µ ˆ

-T0 then it is

µ ˆ

-T2.

Proof :

Let x, y be any two distinct points in X. By Theorem 3.3, X is

µ ˆ

-T0 which implies that

µ ˆ

-closures of distinct points are distinct. Since X is

µ ˆ

-R1, there exist disjoint

µ ˆ

-open sets U and V such that

µ ˆ

cl({x}) ⊂ U and

µ ˆ

cl({y}) ⊂ V and so x ∈ U and y ∈ V. Hence X is an

µ ˆ

-T2 space.

REFERENCES

1. M. Caldas, D.N. Georgiou and S.Jafari, Characterizations of low separation axioms via α-opensets and α-closure operator, Boll. Sci. Paran. Mat. 21(38), 1 – 14 (2003).

2. C. Dorsett, semi-R1 and semi-R0

topological spaces, Ann. Soc.Sci.

Bruxelles 92, 143 – 150 (1978).

3. N. Levine, Semi opensets and semi continuity in topological spaces, Amer.

Math. Monthly, 70, 36–41 (1963).

(8)

4. N. Levine, Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 19(2), 89 – 96 (1970).

5. S.N. Maheshwari and R. Prasad, Some new separation axioms, Ann. Soc. Sci.

Bruxelles Ser.I. 89, 395 – 402 (1975).

6. H. Maki, R. Devi and K. Balachandran, Generalized α-closed sets in topology, Bull Fukuoka Univ. Ed. Part III 42, 13 – 21 (1993).

7. O. Njastad, On some classes of nearly opensets, Pacific J. Math., 15, 961–970 (1965).

8. S. Pious Missier and E. Sucila, On

µ ˆ

- closed sets in topological spaces.

International Journal of Mathematical Archieves, Vol.4, Issue 3, 309 – 315 March (2013).

9. S. Pious Missier and E.Sucila, On

µ ˆ

- continuous functions in topological spaces. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Vol.2, Issue 4, April (2013).

10. S. Pious Misser and E. Sucila, On

µ ˆ

- irresolute functions in topological spaces.

Accepted by International Journal of Ultra Scientist and Physical Sciences.

11. M.K.R.S. Veerakumar, µ-closed sets in topological spaces, Antartica Journal of Math. Reprint.

References

Related documents

As the primary objective of this study was to identify the most powerful markers for outcome to cabazitaxel therapy, all available variables (baseline CTC count, age, PSA,

Poisson rate of PC from start-up to routine, λ HM 0.00117 0.00034 Skill premium of high- to middle-skilled, w ˆ H / ˆ w M Poisson rate of PC from routine to manual, λ ML 0.00578

After the final troparion, immediately chant the above Heirmos as the Katavasia and then what was chanted after Ode 1, followed by the Hypakoe in tone

[r]

The goal of our problem is to build a model for 1) gen- erating a GIF ˆ Y = [ˆ y 1 , ˆ y 2 , ˆ y 3 ] as the thumbnail for each training video such that the aggregated difference

Table 1 Variation of the Absolute Rate difference, the Rate ratio, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII), the Slope index of inequality (SII) and the Population-attributable

IDC Worldwide Locations NORTH AMERICA California Colorado Florida Massachusetts New Jersey New York Ohio Virginia Canada ASIA PACIFIC Australia China Hong Kong India Indonesia

D) alveoli ‡‡ˆ pharynx ‡‡ˆ trachea ‡‡ˆ bronchioles ‡‡ˆ bronchi ‡‡ˆ nasal cavity.. 38) For the given phrase, choose from the list below, the transport pathway that