Kava use and risk of car crash injury: a
population-based case control study in
Fiji
Iris Wainiqolo, Bridget Kool, Berlin Kafoa, Elizabeth Robinson, Eddie McCaig, Josephine Herman, Shanthi Ameratunga
2ndInternational Symposium on Drugs and Driving
Wellington, New Zealand Wed 12 November 2014
Presenter: Iris Wainiqolo
Outline
•
Background
•
Aim
•
Method
•
Results
•
Implications for Injury Prevention
BACKGROUND
•
Burden of road traffic injuries (RTI) is largely borne by
low- and middle-income countries.
•
RTIs are a significant problem in the Pacific Islands
•
Contribution of alcohol and recreational drugs to
driver performance is well established
•
While the consumption of kava (
Piper methysticum)
is high in many Pacific Islands, it’s role in RTI has
received minimal attention
•
Widely consumed beverage in the Pacific (Polynesia,
Micronesia and Melanesia) used for ceremonial,
therapeutic, and recreational purposes.
•
Prepared from dried or green roots of
Piper methysticum
•
Active ingredient: ‘lipid-soluble’ kavalactones (18) of which
6 are commonly associated with observed effects
•
Action of kavalactones:
–
Strong interaction with GABA-A receptors which are plentiful in
the amygdala and hippocampus (sedative, anxiolytic, muscle
relaxation effects)
–
Inhibition of cytochrome P 450 (CYP 450) enzymes in the liver
responsible for hepatic metabolism of a large number of drugs
(caution with drug use)
Why is kava so popular in the islands?
•
“....
It gives a pleasant,
warm and cheerful, but
lazy feeling...” (Hocart,
1929)
•
“....The head is affected
pleasantly; you feel
friendly, not beer
sentimental; you cannot
hate with kava in you.
Kava quiets the mind;....”
(Lemert, 1967)
Why should kava use be a concern?
•
Widespread and regular use of kava and
increasing use of kava with alcohol
(“wash down”)
(
Source: Fiji NCD STEP Survey)•
Negative effects:
–
Acute use: numbing effect in the mouth,
sedation
,
slow reaction/reflexes,
lethargic, lack of coordination (ataxia),
muscle weakness, reduced visual
attention
,
fatigue,
loss of appetite…
•
Fiji: Ban on kava drinking in Government
offices (PSC circular #22/2007)
•
No specific laws against kava drinking and
driving
– Long-haul trucks, cane trucks having ‘kava stops’ on roadsides are still common practice
Scientific evidence
What do we know about kava and crash?
•
Recent SR found no epidemiological studies examining the effect of kava
use on motor vehicle crash or injury
What then?
•
4 Experimental studies investigated the effect of kava on driving
ability/performance;
– 2 German and 2 Australian studies
– Use of computer test system or driving simulator
– All studies report no significant negative effect of kava on driving ability
– 1 study showed that kava in combination with alcohol had significant negative effects on visoumotor skills similar to that used in driving a vehicle.
– All experiments used Medicinal kava doses: 180 – 300 mg
•
Recreational kava doses such as that
used in the Pacific & amongst
Aborigines is 50-100x more potent (Cairney, Kava, Sarris)
AIM
To investigate the association between driving while
under the influence of kava and serious
METHOD
Controls
-
cross-sectional road side survey• Eligible vehicles
– A population-based sample of 4 –wheel
motor vehicles representative of ‘driving time’ on public roads in Viti Levu
Cases -
population-based FISH database • Eligible vehicles– All 4-wheel motor vehicles involved in a crash resulting in a road user (driver, passenger or pedestrian) dying or admitted to hospital for 12 hours or more
Case control analysis
– July 2005 – December 2006
– Multivariable unconditional logistic regression – Analyses conducted using STATA 12 software
RESULTS
- Participant characteristics
Variables
Cases
n=140 (%)
Controls
n=752 (%)
Age of drivers (in years)
15-24
25-34
35-44
45+
19 (13.6)
48 (34.3)
36 (25.7)
37 (26.4)
84 (12.9)
220 (31.8)
222 (29.3)
223 (25.9)
Gender
Female
Male
6 (4.3)
134 (95.7)
35 (6.8)
717 (93.2)
Ethnicity
iTaukei
Indo-Fijian
Other
42 (30.0)
96 (68.6)
2 (1.4)
154 (21.9)
551 (70.1)
47 (8.1)
RESULTS
-
Kava use
Variables
Cases
n=140 (%)
Controls
n=752 (%)
Acute kava use (previous 12 hrs)
No
Yes
108 (77.1)
32 (22.9)
698 (95.7)
54 (4.3)
Usual kava use (past 12 months)
None
Less than a month to monthly
Greater than monthly to daily
36 (25.7)
60 (42.9)
44 (31.4)
269 (44.7)
326 (39.3)
157 (16.0)
RESULTS
- Role of Kava use in RTI
–
Consuming kava within 12 hours of driving
associated with
three-fold increase
in odds of
crash involvement - Adjusted OR = 3.5
(95% CI, 1.47,
8.31)
–
Population Attributable Risk:
16%
(95% CI, 11-20%)
–
No significant interaction
for:
•
Acute kava use and acute alcohol use
IMPLICATIONS FOR INJURY PREVENTION
•
Acute kava use within 12 hours of driving
is
significantly associated with
serious
injury-involved 4-wheeled motor vehicle road
traffic crashes in Viti Levu, Fiji
•
Driving under the influence of kava requires
explicit attention in road safety strategies
in
the Pacific and in countries with large
kava-drinking Pacific populations (e.g. NZ, Australia,
the US)
GAPS IN KAVA RESEARCH
•
Future research - quantify
kava use (volume and
patterns) that pose the
greatest crash risk
•
Development of a test
(biochemical?) to detect
drivers under the
influence of kava
–
Use of compulsory
impairment test by Police
for mood altering
substances other than
alcohol
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• TRIP Project Principal investigators - A/Professor Eddie McCaig, Professors Shanthi Ameratunga, Sitaleki Finau and Rod Jackson; Research Managers - Drs Iris
Wainiqolo, Berlin Kafoa, Josephine Herman and Robyn McIntyre; Research team -Mrs Mabel Taoi, Sr Asilika Naisaki, Mr Ramneek Goundar, Mr Ravi Reddy, Ms Litia Vuniduvu, and Mrs Nola Vanualailai.
• Fiji Ministry of Health, including the former Permanent Secretary Dr Lepani Waqatakirewa, doctors and nurses in divisional and sub divisional hospitals.
• Fiji Police Force Highway Unit and their branches in the Central and Western Divisions for assisting the team collect driver information in roadside surveys on Viti Levu roads.
• Fiji School of Medicine MBBS 6 students (2005-06) for their assistance in establishing the Fiji injury surveillance in hospitals (FISH) register.
• University of Auckland staff and postgraduate researchers who contributed to training and development of research outputs including Professor David Thomas and Robert Scragg, Dr Bridget Kool, Ms Cherie Lovell, Dr Roshini Peiris-John, Ms Naina Raj, Mr Dudley Gentles, and the biostatistical support provided by Mrs Elizabeth Robinson.
• Funding for the Project providing by an International Collaborative Research Grant awarded by the Wellcome Trust and the Health Research Council of New Zealand.