Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems

Program Executive Office

Integrated Warfare Systems

Mr. Jimmy Smith, Director, Above Water Sensors Directorate

2010 National Defense Center of Excellence for

Research in Ocean Sciences Industry Day

30 September 2010

Content

•

PEO IWS Background

•

Advanced Development (PEO IWS 5A)

•

ACB

•

APB

•

Capability Gaps

•

System Engineering (PEO IWS 7)

•

Information Assurance

•

Open Architecture

•

Fleet Synthetic Training

What We Do

•

The PEO IWS organization is aligned to develop,

procure and deliver Enterprise Warfighting Solutions

for Surface Ships

•

PEO IWS has life cycle responsibilities for analysis of

combat system performance, system planning, design

management, systems engineering, integration,

installation, test, maintenance and disposal

•

Navy’s Open Architecture (OA) Enterprise lead for

Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research,

Development and Acquisition (ASN(RDA))

Undersea Systems

IWS 5.0

MPM – CAPT Davis DPM – Mr. Thomas

7

Water-Borne Propagation

Bottom Bounce

Propagation

Bottom Clutter

Shipwrecks

Schools of Fish

Surface Clutter

Surface Duct

Mutual

Interference

Surface Ship

Echoes

Range Dependent SVP

(Worldwide Coverage)

High Fidelity

Target Model

Maximum 30 Contact ‘Entities’

Wake Effects

Range

Dependent

Bottom

Directional

Ambient Noise

Advanced Development Projects

Surface Ship Advanced Capability Build

Submarine Sensors

Volumetric Receive Array

In-buoy processing

Over-the-horizon communications

high power acoustic source

Distributed Netted Sensors

- Different noise characteristics - Collocated with prior ONR data collectedRelay Buoy

RAP VLA

Engineering Measurement Programs Assess System Performance Operationally

Upgrades/ Targeted Enhancements Production System Integration/Test Certification Performance Measurement Data

Improved Modeling, Assessments & Requirements Generation 1. Technology Survey 2. Technology Evaluation 3. Lab-based End-to-End Developmental System T&E 4. At-sea Developmental System T&E APB System Engineering 4 Step Process Operational System Operational Environment EMP Development Cycle

4-Step Process Transitions Advanced Development

1. Component level open data set survey

2. Component level closed data set independent evaluation – risk mitigation step 3. Integrated system level closed data set evaluation

4. Integrated system build on production HW at sea evaluation

SAST

Active Clutter

Advanced Capability

Build (ACB)

DWADS

LCCA

CAVES

Twin-Line Thin-Line Concept

- Surface ASW Synthetic Trainer

- Continuous Active Sonar

- Active Clutter Reduction

Vector Sensor

Concept

Surface Ship USW Combat Systems

Legacy to Future Systems through the ACB Process

Legacy Systems and

IPS / SIPS

TI09/ACB 09

•Synthetic Training Baseline

ACB 11 and Beyond

Search

• Mutual Interference Mitigation

• Improved Active Capability Classify

• ATTDS Signal Processing

• Sonar Situational Awareness

• Automated Data Fusion

• Distributed Netted Sensors Engage

• MK-54 VLA

• Netted Engagement Supportability

• Reality Based Environment

• Fully Integrated Synthetic Training Communications

• ACOMMS

• USW-DSS integration

Establishes a common H/W & S/W architecture

Provides improved capabilities through the APB process

Reconstitutes Towed Array for DDG 51 Flight IIA

Basis for USW Combat Systems on DDG 1000 and LCS

0

20

40

60

80

100

ACB-09

ACB-11

ACB-13

ACB-15

ACB-17

Legacy

IPS

SIPS

Active Detection



Needs:

–

Improved detection and classification at extended ranges

–

Reduce false alarm rate from automation and operators

–

Reduce mutual interference between multiple active ships

Torpedo Defense



Needs:

–

Full coverage at extended ranges

–

Reduce false alert rate

Command and Control



Recent capabilities increase operator workload, common displays will mitigate

this issue

Passive



Need improved passive detection capability against diesel submarines

Training



Need full simulation of full sensor suite and recorded data playback capability

System Performance Improvements

Through Incremental Development

Advance Development

Environment

ONR

IWS5A / IWS5B

APL

Technology

Assessment

Upgrades/

Enhancements

System Integration

Testing

Certification

Performance

Measurement

Embedded

Data Collection

•

Improved Modeling, Assessments

•

Requirements Generation

•

Employment Guidelines Development

•

Tactics & Training

Operational

Environment

3

4

1

2

Tactical Systems

“Apples-to-Apples”

PEO IWS Rapid Capability

Improvement Process

IWS5 AN/SQQ-89(V)

PMS 401 - ARCI

PMS 425 - BYG-1

PMS 435 - ISIS

Production System

EMP

•

Passive Signal Processing

•

Imaging

•

Active Signal Processing

•

Automation



Contact Management



Contact Followers



Target Motion Analysis

•

Information Management

•

Training

•

Gaps and Seams Analysis still in progress - More

detail to be provided at the Dec 2010 Submarine

Industry Day

Advanced Undersea Technologies BAA

N0002410IWS5A01 (FEDBIZOPS)

Open from 8 June 2010 to 7 June 2011



Three focus areas:

–

Submarine Combat System Signal Processing Technologies

–

Surface Antisubmarine Warfare Systems Signal Processing Technologies

–

Undersea Sensor, Handling, and Communication Technologies



Industry Days

–

Surface Ship Industry Day was 19 August

–

Submarine Industry Day in November/December 2010



White Papers

–

Submitted with technical approach, experience, capabilities, past performance,

and initial cost estimate

–

Papers evaluated and if selected will be invited to submit full technical and/or

cost proposal for a maximum of 5 year period including all options.



Emphasis on maturing technologies for laboratory and at-sea

testing and subsequent transition into Naval combat systems.

IWS 5A

Future C/S & HSI

IWS 7.0

MPM – CAPT Gannon DPM – Mr. Miranda

IA Technologies

NAVSEA afloat systems require IA and IA enabled

products that



Support the establishment of a robust defense-in-depth (DiD)

security architecture to protect, detect, react, and recover

information systems from inadvertent operator error, malicious

attack (internal and external), and major calamity (fire, flooding,

loss of power, etc.)

and



Promote the availability, integrity, confidentiality, authentication,

and non-repudiation of information

IA Technologies

Key characteristics include:



Effective against nation state information operations

tradecraft



Support real-time, tactical data exchanges



Are complementary across network infrastructure, systems,

applications, and hosts (within a layer of the architecture)



Are complementary across levels in the shipboard

architecture



Automated, where possible and practical, to support

decreased manning



Relatively easy and inexpensive to implement, maintain, and

update

Challenges

Business Area #1:

Establishing an Enabling Environment,

Demonstrating Life cycle Affordability, Encouraging

Competition and Collaboration;

Business Area #2:

Designating Key Interfaces;

Technical Area #1:

Achieving Interoperability between Joint

Warfighting Applications, Providing Secure Information

Exchange, using Selected Open Standards;

Technical Area #2:

Architecting Modular Designs and

Generating Design Disclosures, Employing Modular

Designs;

Technical Area #3:

Using Reusable Applications Software;

Fleet Synthetic Training

•

The Fleet Synthetic Training goal is to provide a system that can produce a

higher level of operational proficiency and readiness in a measurably shorter

period of time reducing the cost of preparing for operations. This will be

achieved by taking advantage of advances in advanced and distributed training

applications:

•

Focus Area – Crew Performance Definition, Assessment, and Debrief

–

Cognitive Theory Analysis

•

Decompose surface ship crew functions into a set of metrics based competencies

•

Competency based training metrics tracking to achieve a higher level of proficiency, reduce incidents

& minimize training cost

•

Develop a Measurement Model of Performance in Multi-tasking Environments

–

Competency Based Metrics Automated Analysis

•

Automate decomposition of metrics for analyses and feedback of complex training events

•

Adaptability for specific levels of training (individual, team, unit, Strike Group, Coalition)

–

Scenario Generation & Control (SGC)

•

Competency based training requires a cognitive theory based SGC system

•

Adaptive Scenario Generation and Control

–

Data Collection Based Upon Competencies

•

Schema that recognizes exercise competencies & collects appropriate data

–

Verbal Command Data Collection

•

Capture & understand verbal commands utilized by an automated

assessment tool/system



Debriefs

–

Capability to diagnose crew performance deficiencies

–

Provide relevant sample best practice guidance and examples

–

Evaluate training scenario effectiveness

–

Systematically track trends in performance and establish performance distributions and performance

benchmarks

•

Focus Area – Distributed Training Applications

–

Intelligent Agent – Exercise Conduct Phase “Rational / Thinking”

Injections

•

Agent-based modeling to provide Mission level doctrinally correct behaviors

•

Realistic and automated team simulation supporting training with low

overhead while providing high fidelity representations of crew, own ship, Strike

Group and opposing forces

•

Reactive entities and environment (e.g., shifting radar ducts, water column

temps, etc.)

–

Mission Rehearsal, In-Theater Scenario Management

Optimization

•

Overcome communications s/ bandwidth limitations

•

Near real-time Intelligence insertion

•

Rapid injection of Objective Area Phenomenon

•

Schema to approach ‘Real World’ fidelity

•

Higher, High Level Architecture replacement / adaptation

•

Robust replication of C4ISR entities and organizations with integrated exercise

capability

•

Determine Strike Group Effectiveness

Rapidly evolving, layered, net-centric sensors and C3

enterprise services

155 Programs

PEO IWS

SBIR Efforts

PEO IWS FY09 Spending

1000+ FY09 contract actions

Product Service Code (PSC) Descriptions

Administrative and Management Support Services

Ammunitions and Explosives

Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks

Electrical and Electronic Equipment Components

Engineering and Technical Services

Fire Control Equipment

Guided Missiles

Weapons

Radar Equipment, Except Airborne

Research and Development

Other

Contract

Vehicles/Avenues:



Requirements



IDIQ



BOA



GSA



Seaport-e

Total Small Business

Contract Dollars:

Veteran Owned

SDVOSB

Woman Owned

Minority Owned

Asian Pacific

Black

Hispanic

Disadvantaged

Small Disadvantaged

8(a)

IWS FY09 SB

Contract Values

Veteran Owned

$ 3,537,845

SDVOSB

$ 306,345

Woman Owned

$ 6,681,731

Minority Owned

$ 11,011,287

Asian Pacific

$ 5,042,985

Black

$ 2,440,000

Hispanic

$ 2,622,044

Disadvantaged

$ 125,881

Small Disadvantaged

$ 8,048,787

8(a)

$ 7,948,787

PEO IWS FY09 Small Business Contracts

IWS FY09 Dollars

Small Business Dollars Only

Large Business Prime Contract Dollars Excluded

Total Small Business

Contract Dollars:

26 B02-004 N02-047 N99-083 N04-066 N05-124 N08-216 N99-118 N02-028 N05-125 N08-219 N00-062 N01-100 N05-148 N09-136 N00-067 N02-125 N06-050 N09-137 N00-123 N03-077 N07-213 N09-138 N01-039 N03-084 N08-055 N09-193 N01-059 N03-218 N08-056 N09-212 N01-092 N04-067 N08-165 N10-044 N04-138 N05-123 N08-173 N10-048 N10-145 N10-149 N10-152 N01-095 N01-120 N01-118 N02-017 N02-126 N02-130 N02-140 N03-064 N03-087 N03-214 N03-215 N04-064 N04-163 N05-147 N06-049 N06-052 N06-178 N06-179 N07-052 N07-055 N07-214 N07-215 N08-164 N08-170 N08-173 N08-208 N08-209 N09-045 N09-121 N09-141 N09-188 N09-212 N09-217 N10-156 N99-144 N03-083 N06-181 N00-123 N02-139 N03-076 N03-213 N04-058 N04-165 N05-123 N06-179 N06-180 N08-209 N00-059 N00-120 N01-060 N02-045 N03-063 N03-079 N04-062 N04-164 N05-126 N06-050 N06-052 N10-044 N10-067 N10-145 N10-149 N10-154 N00-065 N08-164 N01-091 N08-165 N03-064 N03-074 N03-082 N03-086 N03-089 N04-065 N06-180 N07-052 N01-077 N09-121 N01-103 N09-125 N02-029 N09-141 N03-065 N09-187 N03-219 N09-200 N04-161 N09-209 N04-162 N04-163 N04-168 N06-049 N07-214 N08-053 N08-167 N08-172 N08-213 N08-215 N08-217 N99-153 N03-048 N08-208 N01-058 N04-068 N09-137 N02-042 N04-166 N09-217 N02-043 N04-169 N10-067 N02-066 N05-125 N03-063 N05-127 N07-214 N08-171 N01-090 N03-202 N04-211 N10-148 N01-093 N01-184 N01-121 N10-158 N02-044 N02-046 N02-048 N08-213 N10-153 N10-154 N01-122 N04-059 N06-181 N01-130 N02-136 N02-139 N08-167 N02-039 N03-080 N04-057 N06-178 N02-042 N02-044 N03-202 N06-051 N08-053 N08-056 N10-048 N02-130 N96-076 N03-066 N03-080 N05-124 N03-078 N04-211 N06-051 N08-054 N08-055 N09-187 N10-153 N04-162 N09-200 N08-170 N08-172 N02-138 N07-055 N03-088 N05-127 N08-171 N08-216 N08-215

PEO IWS ACTIVE SBIR TOPICS

(FY02.1 – FY10.2 Solicitations )

N09-193 N09-188

N10-146

N10-148

N10-153

Phase II to Phase III

Transition Rate

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10

$M

Execution

Outside

Small Business Funding Profile

As of

September

2010

FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10

$M

SBIR

Execution

7.59

11.90 12.38 12.18 14.53 15.12 19.61 20.03

29.60

Outside